22.07.2013 Views

fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace

fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace

fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACTOBS AFFECTING AMINO ACID<br />

AVAILABTT,I1TES FOR CEREAL GRATNS<br />

AND THETR COMPONENTS FOR GROITNG<br />

YTONOGASTRTC ANIMALS<br />

A THESIS<br />

PRESENTEÐ TO<br />

The I'aculty of Graduate Studies and Research<br />

Unlversity of Manitoba<br />

<strong>fn</strong> <strong>Partíal</strong> <strong>Fulfillnent</strong><br />

of the Requirements for the Degree<br />

Doctor of Philosophy<br />

by<br />

Wil1en Corne}Ís Sauer<br />

Department of Aninal Science<br />

IIay, L9Z6


'FACTORS AFFECTING AI'IINO ACID<br />

AVAILABILITIES FOR CEREAL GRAINS<br />

AND THEIR CO|VIPONENTS FOR GRO'{ING<br />

}4ONOGASTRIC ANTIIALS"<br />

by<br />

I^IILLEM CORNELIS SAUER<br />

A clisserkrtir¡n subrnitted to tho Faculty of Gradultr: Sturlics of<br />

thc [Jnivcrsity ol' M¿nitr¡b¿¡ in partial fullillmr:nt ol' tho rcr¡uirctncnts<br />

ol' lltt' dr,glcc ol'<br />

DO('TOR OF PHILOSOP}IY<br />

@, 19?6<br />

l'crnrission h¿rs l¡curt gl'ûr¡tcd to tho l.,lBlì^.RY Ol; 1'llli ttNlvUR-<br />

Sl1'Y OF M^Nl'l'OllA tt¡ lcrrrl or scll copies of this d¡s.$rt tioD. t()<br />

the NATIONAL LIBR^lìY Ol¡ (:ANAI)A to nticmfiln¡ this<br />

dissert¡tion and to lend or scl¡ copies of the f¡lnr, and UNIVËRslTY<br />

MICROFILMS to publish an abstri¡ct of tl¡is dissertation.<br />

The uuthor rescrves other publication rights, ¡¡nd ncithcr thc<br />

dissertation nor extensivc cxtracts l'runr it may be printed of olhrr-<br />

wise reproduccd without lhc author's writtcr¡ pcrn¡issi()n.


ÐEDTCATED TO T,IY DAUGHTER,<br />

MARGRTET VATENTTNA


TAB],8 OF CONTENTS<br />

page<br />

ABSTRACT. T<br />

ACKNOWIEÐGEI,ÍENTS... . TV<br />

],TST OF TABLES. V<br />

LTST OF FIGTIRES. . XT<br />

LIST OF APPENDTCES. XTT<br />

T,TST OF ABBREVTATTONS FOR A¡{INO ACTDS<br />

XVÏ<br />

INTRODUCTTOI{..... 1<br />

REVTEW OF THE LTTERATURE. 3<br />

Part 1. Cereal grain conposition and factors<br />

affecting anino acid avallabilities... ?<br />

Part 2. Protein metabolisn ín the large<br />

j.ntestine of monogastric aninals 18<br />

Part 3. Determination of amino acid availabilities<br />

by i1eal sampling fron cannulated<br />

aaimals, by ileal sanpling fron sac¡ificed<br />

aninals, by renoval of the caecum and by aid<br />

of germ-free and antibj.otic t¡reated aninals.....<br />

MAÎERTALS AND METHODS<br />

Study 1.....<br />

Study 2.<br />

Study 3<br />

Study l¡.<br />

Stu4y Za<br />

Study 2b.<br />

28<br />

34<br />

3lr<br />

40<br />

40<br />

49<br />

49<br />

56


RESIILTS.<br />

Study 4a.<br />

Study 4b.<br />

Analytical Procedures.<br />

Study 1.<br />

Study 2.<br />

Study 3<br />

Study 4.<br />

ÐrscussIoN.<br />

Study<br />

Studv 2a.<br />

Study 2b.<br />

Study 3a.<br />

Studv 3b.<br />

Study 4a.<br />

Study .t¡b.<br />

Page<br />

57<br />

ó1<br />

6L<br />

63<br />

ot<br />

7l+<br />

t+<br />

87<br />

89<br />

9r<br />

95<br />

98<br />

98<br />

r06<br />

110<br />

110<br />

tr0<br />

LL2<br />

LI7<br />

119<br />

l.22


SUIIIMARY.<br />

sTuDï 4.<br />

STUDY 3<br />

sruDr 1....:..<br />

8ÏBLTOGRAPIfT<br />

APPENDICES.<br />

L26<br />

L33<br />

L45<br />

r61<br />

180<br />

185<br />

L97<br />

205<br />

218


ABSTRACT<br />

The apparent ileal and faecal anino acid availabilities<br />

fron corn, wheat and barley v¡ere determined with barrows<br />

ranging Ín weight from 45 to 75 kE, that l¡ere fitted !úith<br />

ileocaeeal ¡e-entrant cannulae. The average ileal versus (vs)<br />

faecal avail-abilitles were 85.6 vs 89.9, 83.3 vs 89.1 and<br />

77.7 vs 85% for eorn, wheat and barley respectively. For the<br />

indispensable amino acids, ARG, HfS and TllR disappeared to the<br />

greatest e:(tent in the large íntestÍne (P(.05). For the dis-<br />

pensable anino acids, GIY and PRO disappeared to the largest<br />

extent in the large intest,ine (P


2t5/o brar!, 45fo shorts and LØ" middlings (B+S+M) were deternj.ned<br />

in pigs. The average ilea1 vs faecaL availabilities were pO.O<br />

vs 94.1, 85.4 vs 92.3 and 72.I '¡s 80.41Á tor flour, wheat and<br />

B+S+M respectively, Generally speaking, A.R,G, HfS THR, GLI and<br />

PRO dlsappeared to the largest extent in the large intestine.<br />

Of the ind.ispensable amino aeids, LTS and THR were<br />

equal 1n being least ayailable from flour and wheat. The i1eal<br />

LYS vs TIIR availabllities r¡ere 84.2 vs 85.4 and 79,5 vs 78.t+/"<br />

f¡on flour and r¡heat respectively. Lysine l¡as the least<br />

avallabLe amino acid hrhen deternlned by the faecaL analysis<br />

method, namely 86.1 and 86.O/" for flour and wheat respeetively.<br />

flea1 and faecal availabilities of THR in B+S+M ìrere lowest<br />

iuith values of 54.0 and 7l.3d/o respectlvely.<br />

The apparent ileal and faecal Êmino acj.d availabilities<br />

from finely ground and cracked wheat were dete¡nined with bar-<br />

rows that weighed approxínately 75 kg, The average ileal vs<br />

faecal availabilitles were 87.2 vs 91.6 and 82.8 vs 9O.è/" for<br />

finely ground and cracked wheat respectlveJ.y. The ileal<br />

availabilities of ¡nost amlno acids were significantly higher<br />

(P


irnprove the protein retention of barrows, rangj.ng in weight<br />

from 25 to l¡0 kg, that vrere fed diets lorrv Ín LTS.<br />

Metabolic Íleal and faecal anino acid leve1s were<br />

deterniaed w'ith barrows, ranging in weÍght fro¡r 45 to ?5 kg,<br />

that were fed 3 proteln-free dÍets containlng 5 , IO and IJ/"<br />

AlphafJ-oc respectively. As the level of Alphafloc was in-<br />

creased fron 5 to 10 and to L5/", the average ileal vs faecal<br />

anino acíd 1eve1s, expressed as grarns per I00 grams of dry<br />

natter intake, increased fron.0Z2 vs.032 to .091 vs .046<br />

and to .093 vs .050. The average ilea1 vs faecal nitrogen<br />

levels increased fro¡r .205 vs .101 to .256 vs .I39 and to<br />

.27I vs .161. The dlspensable anj_no acids mad.e up ?5 to gO/"<br />

of the total aeount of metabolic i1ea1 amino acids, of which<br />

PBO and GLY nade up 55 and 16S respectively. Arginine, TIÍR,<br />

GLT and PRO (especially the last Z anino acids) disappeared<br />

extensiveLy in the large i.ntestine. The levels of IÌ,E, LEU,<br />

LYS, MET and ASP increased between the end of the ileum and<br />

the anus of pigs fed the protein-free diets.<br />

IÏI


ACKNOIqLEDCEMENTS<br />

the author would like to thank Dr. S. C. Stothers<br />

for advice and help during the course of this work. <strong>fn</strong> particular,<br />

freedom of scienti-fic expression that was allowed<br />

and additional financial help receÍved are very nnuch<br />

appreciated.<br />

Many thanks are due to ll¡. J. Maltnan for giving<br />

voluntarily nuch of hfs own free time to assist during the<br />

pig collectíons, whfch were often caried out at very awkward<br />

tj-nes. <strong>fn</strong> addj.tion, his help with regard to various other<br />

aspects dealing with this thesís is appreciated.<br />

I wish to thank Dr. G. D. Phillips for Èhe surgery<br />

on ny pÍgs and for his interest and encouragement origínally<br />

during the start of these studies.<br />

The author is also very grateful to Ðr. N. E. Stanger<br />

and Ðr. M. Landeros for perfoming surgery'on the pÍgs during<br />

the last part of these studies.<br />

The wríter likes to thank l4r. J. Gano and<br />

¡[r. J. Baptist for their heJ.p, at times beyond thei¡ call of<br />

duty, during these studies. Acknowledgenent Ís also due to<br />

Mr. J. A. McKtrdy and IvIr. P. A. Mills for aÍd with technical<br />

analyses.<br />

FLnally, I would 11ke to thank ny wife, Christine,<br />

for her encouragement and patience. Financial- help from my<br />

parents and parents-1n-law is also appreciated.<br />

Winnipeg, I¡,ay 1976<br />

fV<br />

Itlillem Cornelis Sauer.


Table<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

8.<br />

o<br />

10.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

L3.<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

the llnfting an<strong>fn</strong>o acids for rats and<br />

pigs when cereal graÍn supply the<br />

only protein.....<br />

The anino acid composition of aleurone<br />

protein, gLutenin and prolamin from<br />

wheat end those of albunin, globuIin,<br />

glutenin and prolanin fro¡r barley.<br />

The anino acids levels (/") of wheat and<br />

wheat by-products end the distrLbution<br />

of anino acids in wheat by-products. . . . .<br />

True anino acid availabilLties fron corn,<br />

wheat and barley for growing pigs.......<br />

Percent nitrogen of wheat and barLey<br />

fractlons obtained at different tine<br />

lntervals of abrasion<br />

Fornulation of test dlets for study 1.....<br />

Formulatlon of diets for study 2..........<br />

Forroulation of test diets in study 3<br />

The experÍqental desígn and the daily<br />

intake of dry matter and orally and<br />

caecally supplfed nitrogen in study 3a..<br />

The experimental design and the daily<br />

intâke of dry natter and nitrogen and<br />

orally and caeeally supplled lysine in<br />

study 3b.<br />

Formulation of diets for study l+..........<br />

The anino acid and nitrogen content of<br />

high and lovr proteln wheat and their<br />

fractions.<br />

The ani.no acid and ni.trogen content of<br />

high and Low pnotein barley and<br />

theír fractions. .<br />

Page<br />

t_0<br />

1I<br />

L3<br />

36<br />

38<br />

41<br />

5I<br />

53<br />

54<br />

58<br />

64<br />

65


Table<br />

14.<br />

15.<br />

16.<br />

L7.<br />

18.<br />

19.<br />

20.<br />

2L.<br />

22.<br />

23.<br />

2J+.<br />

25.<br />

I!îeans ar¡d standard devÍation of dailv<br />

dry natter intake for the test and'<br />

proteln-free diets for study 1..........<br />

Means and standard error of the nean of<br />

the apparent availabilities of anino<br />

acids fron wheat and its fractions... i..<br />

Mea¡s and standard error of the nean of<br />

the apparent availabilities of amlno<br />

acids fron whole barley and endospern<br />

fron barley<br />

Means and standard error of the nean of<br />

apparent a¡nino acid availabilities of<br />

high and Low protein nheat and barley...<br />

The effect of dietary fiber level and<br />

weight of the rats on the ¡¡etabolic<br />

faecal a¡nino acid and nitrogen excretÍon<br />

Proximater lcid and neutral-detergeat fiber,<br />

starch and chrouic oxi.de analysãs for<br />

diets in study 2.<br />

Aulno aeid eomposition of diets for<br />

study 2.<br />

Conparisons of the Índ1vÍdual eieht-hour<br />

ileal collections fron wheat fõr study 2a<br />

Apparent il eal and faecal amíno acid<br />

availabilities<br />

of the cereal grains Ín<br />

study 2a.<br />

Conparison of i1eal dry natter dlgestibilities<br />

baEed on total dry natter èxcretion<br />

and chrorol c. oxide levels.<br />

Metabolic ileal and faecal anino acid<br />

levels fron study 2a.. . ..<br />

Apparent faecal amíno acid availabiLities<br />

of the cereal grains, 1n addit,ion to<br />

niÈrogen and dry natter digestibilit,ies<br />

for study 2b<br />

VÏ<br />

Page<br />

67<br />

69<br />

70<br />

72<br />

73<br />

75<br />

77<br />

?9<br />

80<br />

8,+<br />

86<br />

88


Table<br />

26.<br />

27.<br />

28.<br />

29.<br />

30.<br />

3L.<br />

32.<br />

33.<br />

34.<br />

35.<br />

36.<br />

37.<br />

38.<br />

Metabolic faecal anino acid and nitrogen<br />

Levels for study 2b....<br />

Anino acld and nitrogen conpositlon of<br />

Page<br />

test diets ln study 3,.... 92<br />

Individual daily nltrogen intakes and<br />

faecal and urinary logses and sone<br />

calculated parameters in study 3a....... 93<br />

The average amounts of nitrogen<br />

retained, nitrogen retentions and<br />

biological values for diets in study 3a. 9l+<br />

Individuat daily nitrogen intakes and<br />

faecal and urínary losses and sone<br />

calculated parenetel.s ln study 3b....... 96<br />

Average amounts of nltrogen retained,<br />

nitroge! retentions and biological<br />

values for dlets in study 3b.;.. 9?<br />

Proximate, ac j-d and neutral-detergent<br />

fiber and ehronic oxide analysei for<br />

diets of study d. 99<br />

Anino acld conposltion of diets fron<br />

study 4. 101<br />

Apparent ilea1 and faecal anino acid<br />

availabilities of whole wheat, f)-our<br />

and B+S+M and B+S+¡{-D for study 4....... lO2<br />

Metabolic i1eal and faecal amino acid<br />

level.s in study 4a...<br />

Partfcle size distribution of flnely ground<br />

and cracked wheat and of the ileai ãlgesta<br />

derived thereof<br />

Apparent iLeal aad faecal anino acid<br />

availabilities of ground and cracked<br />

wheat for study 4b<br />

Conparisons of apparent faecal anino acid<br />

avallabillties, nitrogen and dry nåtter<br />

digestibilities between caanulated and<br />

normal pigs fed corn, wheat and barley.. 111<br />

VÏT<br />

90<br />

105<br />

LO7<br />

109


lable<br />

39.<br />

40.<br />

l+1 .<br />

l+2.<br />

43.<br />

l+l+.<br />

45.<br />

l+6.<br />

47.<br />

48.<br />

Conparisons of the metabolic faecal anÍno<br />

âcid and nitroge n exeretion between<br />

study 2a and 2b.<br />

Apparent ileal and faecal atû1no acid<br />

availabíIíties, in addition to nitrogen,<br />

dry matter, starch and crude fiber<br />

digestlbÍlities and the dísappearance<br />

of these substances in tbe large<br />

Page<br />

r13<br />

intestine_. 115<br />

Conparison of apparent il-eal and faecal<br />

amino acid avaílabilities from corn<br />

and barley as obtained fron different<br />

laboratories. .... 1f8<br />

The disappearånce of amlno acids, nitrogen,<br />

dry natter, starch and crude fíber in the<br />

Iarge intestine.. J-zO<br />

?tre distributlon of partÍ.cIe slze of the<br />

cereal grai.n diets and of the i1eal<br />

digesta derived fron eaeh dlet.. L25<br />

Levels of anÍno acid, total nitrogen and<br />

dry natter in ileal digesta and faeces<br />

fron the cannulated plgs fed the<br />

maiatenance diets.<br />

Amino acÍd, total nitrogen and dry natter<br />

appearance (+) or disappearance- (-) in<br />

the large intestine in- þigs fed the<br />

protein-free diets<br />

r29<br />

t35<br />

Anino acid conposition of netabolic protein<br />

determined at different laboratoriès.... L37<br />

Apparent ílea1 anino acld availabilities fro¡r<br />

corn and the estinated true availabilities<br />

as calculated by the use of different type<br />

of corrections. L39<br />

Apparent ileal anino acid avallabilitj.es<br />

fron wheat and the estimated true<br />

avallabllities as calculated by the<br />

use of dlfferent t,ype of corrections.... 140<br />

VÏÏÏ


Table<br />

49.<br />

50.<br />

t1<br />

52.<br />

53.<br />

51+.<br />

55.<br />

56.<br />

Apparent ileal anino acid availabilÍt,ies<br />

fron barl.ey and the estimated true<br />

Page<br />

avaílabilitles as calculated by the<br />

use of dÍfferent type of correctlons.... f4l<br />

Estlnation of the dally endogeneous<br />

protein secretion into the lunen of the<br />

snall intestine of a 70 kg. man.. . It+?<br />

the apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />

availabilities from ground and cracked<br />

wheat in additlon to the digestÍbillties<br />

of amino acids in the large intestine<br />

and the differences in peicentage units<br />

between l1eal and faecal anino ãcid<br />

availabilities... 162<br />

Conparisons of ileaL and faecal amino<br />

acid availabílitles fron wheat fron<br />

studies 2a and 4 as affected by the<br />

type of pre-processlng...<br />

Apparent lleal and faecal- amlno acid<br />

availabilitles, Ín addition to nitrogen<br />

and dry matter-digestlbilities aad tñe<br />

disappearance of these substances Ín the<br />

large intestine.. L66<br />

Ihe recoverï of anino aci.ds from B+S+M and<br />

flor¡r (colunn A), in addition to the i1eal<br />

amino acid availabllltÍes fron B+S+M thet<br />

were. measured directly (column B) and those<br />

of BIS+M that were caiculated by difference<br />

from cracked wheat and flour ( colunn C) and<br />

fron finely sround wheat and flour<br />

(colunn D):.;.<br />

The apparent ileal a¡nino acid availabilities<br />

t69<br />

fron B+S+M-D and B+S+M, in addition to the<br />

esti.mated true availablllties from<br />

B+S+IU-D. L77<br />

the an<strong>fn</strong>o acid conposítion and crude fiber<br />

content of bran and endosperm fron<br />

study I and study 4a..., 18ó<br />

il(


Table<br />

57.<br />

58-<br />

59.<br />

Page<br />

Conparisons of apparent faecal anino acid<br />

availabilfties, in addition to nitrogen<br />

and dry matter digestibilíties, of wheat<br />

and barley fed to pigs and ratà.. . 188<br />

Conparisons of the apparent iLeal a¡ni.no<br />

acid avaílabillties, in addítion Èo<br />

aitrogen and dry matter digestibilitles<br />

of wheat aad barl.ey fed to pigs and<br />

the estinated ileaL value fór rats...... Lgl+<br />

ConparLson of faecaL amino acid<br />

availabillties fron bran and endospern<br />

fron wheat fed to pigs and rats....... 195


LTST OF FTGT'RES<br />

Figure Page<br />

1. Tlrpe and size of cannulae used..<br />

2. Experimental design and allowable<br />

dietary intake for study 2a.... l+7<br />

3. Exper<strong>fn</strong>ental design and allovrable<br />

daily dietary iatake for study tþ........ óO l<br />

XT


Appendix<br />

Table<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

l+.<br />

5.<br />

6.<br />

8.<br />

LIST OF APPENDTCES<br />

Page<br />

Analysís of varianee between treatments<br />

for study 1: Mean squares for apparent<br />

altrogen and dry matter digestibiJ-itÍes. 2J.8<br />

Analysis of variance between treatments<br />

for study 1: Mean squares for netabollc<br />

faecal anino acfd and aitrogen losses... 2L9<br />

The individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />

ar0Íno acld availabllities frorn corn in<br />

study 2a, in additlon to nitrogen and<br />

dr? lratter digestibilities and average<br />

daily dry natter intake 22O<br />

Tbe individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />

â'¡ino acid availabl]lties f,ron barley Ín<br />

study 2a, in addition to n5.trogen and<br />

dr7 natter digest,ibilities and average<br />

daily dry natter intake. 22L<br />

lhe individual apparent ileal. and faecal<br />

anino acid availabillties fron wheat in<br />

study 2a, in addltion to nitrogen and<br />

dry natter digestibtlitÍes and average<br />

daily dry matter lntake.<br />

Mean squares of the analyses of variance for<br />

the apparent ileal and faecal availabillties<br />

of the essential amino acids for<br />

study 2a. . 223<br />

Mean squares for the enalysis of variance<br />

for the apparent Íleal and faecal<br />

avallabilities of the non-essentlal<br />

amino acids, 1n addítion to nitrogen<br />

and dry matter dlgestibilities for<br />

study 2a. 221+<br />

Mean squares of the analyses of vari,ance<br />

for the apparent ileal and faecal<br />

availabilities of I{ET and CYS for<br />

study 2a.......<br />

xrï<br />

. 225


Appendix<br />

Table<br />

9.<br />

t0.<br />

11.<br />

12.<br />

t3.<br />

14.<br />

L5.<br />

16.<br />

L7.<br />

18.<br />

The individual netabolic ileal anino acid<br />

and nitrogen levels, ín addition to dry<br />

netter digestlbilitles and daily dry<br />

matter lntake for pígs fed the<br />

maintenance dlets.<br />

The indtvldual netabolic faeeal a¡[ino acid<br />

and nitrogea leve1s, in additlon to dry<br />

natter dtgesttbilities for plgs fed the<br />

naintenance diets. .<br />

Mean squares of analyses of varÍance for<br />

the apparent anino acid availablllties,<br />

aitrogen and dry natter digestlbilltles<br />

for study 2b<br />

Page<br />

226<br />

227<br />

228<br />

The individual apparent faecal am:ino acid<br />

availabilities fron barley in study 2b,<br />

1¡ additíon to nitrogen and dry natter<br />

digestibilities,. 229<br />

The indivldual apparent faecal anino acid<br />

acid availabllities fron corn in study 2b,<br />

in addition to nitrogen and dry mattei<br />

digestibilttles.. 23O<br />

the indivldual apparent faecal anj.no acid<br />

avaÍlabilities froe wbeat in study 2b,<br />

1n addition to nitrogen and dry natter<br />

digestibilities.. i ¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ 23L<br />

lvtrean squares of the analyses of variance of<br />

the uetabollc faecal a¡nino acid and nitrogen<br />

excretion from study 2b. 232<br />

The individual netabolfc faecal amino acid<br />

e4d nitrogen excretlon fron pigs fed the<br />

?% aLphaîloc naintenance diet.l. 83<br />

The lndividual netabolic faecal anino acld<br />

an{ nitrogen excretion from pigs fed the<br />

14Ø alphailoc maintenance diãtl. BL<br />

Analyses of variance between treatnents for<br />

parameters neasured in study 3a...,.,... 235<br />

XTIÏ


Appendlx<br />

Table<br />

19.<br />

20,<br />

2L.<br />

22.<br />

23.<br />

24.<br />

25.<br />

Page<br />

The indÍvidual. apparent 1leal and faecal<br />

auino acid avaÍlabilitfes from whole<br />

wheat in study l¡a, Ín addition to<br />

nitrogen and dry natter digestibllities<br />

and average daily dry matter intake..... 236<br />

The lndivldual apparent ilea1 and faecal<br />

anino acld availabilltles from flour ia<br />

study l¡a, in addition to nitrogen and<br />

dry natter digesttbiU-tles and average<br />

daily dry matter intake<br />

237<br />

The lndividual apparent ileal and faecal<br />

anino aci.d availabilities f,ro¡¡ the<br />

B+S+M diet in study lt, in addition to<br />

nitrogen and dry nâtter digestibilities<br />

and average dalJ.y dry natter intake..... 238<br />

The lndividual apparent ÍIeal and faecal<br />

amlao acid availabilÍties fron diet<br />

B+S+M-D fron study l¡a, in addition to<br />

nitrogen and dry matter digestibilities<br />

and average daily dry mattèr intake..... 239<br />

the individual netabolic ileal and faecaÌ<br />

anino aÍcd, nitrogen and dry nåtter<br />

levels fron plgs fed the 5f" al-phafloc<br />

protein-free d1ets, in addft,ion to<br />

average dally dry natter intake 24O<br />

The lndividual ¡¡etabolic ilea1 and faecal<br />

anino aeid, nitrogen _and dry matter levels<br />

from plgs fed the 10fi atphafloc protein-free<br />

dfet, 1n addition to average daily dry<br />

natter intake Z4L<br />

The lndividual netabolic ilea1 and faecal<br />

anino ac5.d, nitrogen and dry matter<br />

levels fron plgs fed the L5/o aLphaf1oc<br />

protein-free diets, in addítion to<br />

average dalIy dry roatter intake 242<br />

ïïv


Appendlx<br />

lable<br />

26.<br />

27.<br />

28.<br />

Anal-yses of variance: Mean Equares for<br />

apperent ileal and faecal enino acid<br />

availabilities, nítrogen and dry matter<br />

diEestibllitles digestibllitles fron from finelv finely sround ground<br />

and cracked wheat for study l+b....<br />

Page<br />

2l+3<br />

The tndividual apparent ileal and faecal<br />

anino acid availabllities of ground<br />

wheat from study l¡b, in addition to<br />

nitrogen and dry matter digest,ibilities<br />

and average daily dry natter intake..... 241+<br />

The individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />

amino acld availabilities of cracked<br />

!úheat from study db, in addltion to<br />

nitrogen and dry natter digestibilities<br />

and everage dally dry natter intake 2l+5


AIA<br />

ARG<br />

ASP<br />

cYs<br />

GLU<br />

GLT<br />

r{rs<br />

II,E<br />

tEu<br />

LYS<br />

¡[ET<br />

PI{E<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TTIR<br />

TRT<br />

TTR<br />

VAL<br />

LTST<br />

FOR<br />

OF ABBREVTATTONS<br />

THE AMINO .{CIDS<br />

Alanine<br />

Arginine<br />

Aspartic acid<br />

Cystine<br />

Glutanic acid<br />

Glycine<br />

HistÍdine<br />

l- SOl.eUC r-ne<br />

teuc ine<br />

Lysine<br />

Methionine<br />

Phenylalanine<br />

froJ-l.ne<br />

Serine<br />

Threoníne<br />

Tryptophan<br />

lyrosine<br />

Valine


I}iTRODUCTION<br />

The nutritive value of a proteÍn is not only<br />

determined by.its amino acld composition but also by the<br />

avaÍlability of the individual amino aclds of the protein to<br />

the nonogastric animal . For more accurate and econor.rícal<br />

fornul-ation of dietary amino aci.d levels in relatj-on to<br />

requirements, available instead of total aroi.no acid 1eve1s<br />

from specific protein sources and from energy feeds that<br />

also supply protein, should be taken into account.<br />

The term availability has been defined by<br />

de Lhelenaere et a1 . (L967) as that portion of amino acids<br />

present in a protein whích is used for grovrth, development and<br />

maintenance of an ani.mal insofa¡: as it is dependent on the<br />

digestlbility of the protein, the presence of enzyrae inhibítors<br />

and enzyme-res i stånt peptide linkages, and rate of release of<br />

amino acids in the intestLnal tract. Amino acid availability<br />

defined as such may be determined according to the faecal ana-<br />

l1,sis method, which neasures the a¡rounts of ingested anrino<br />

acids excreted in the faeces.<br />

The faecal analysÍs method was developed by Kuiken<br />

and Lyman in 1948 and hâs since gained general acceptance in<br />

nutritional research. However, ín recent years, this method has<br />

been often criticized because of possible microbÍal alterations<br />

of undigested and unabsorbed nitrogeneous residues in the large<br />

intestine<br />

I


äolnes et el . ¡7,o7L) Ceteririned the ileal anci<br />

faecal emino acid availabilit ies fro¡:r specific protein sources,<br />

nanel¡i so¡rbean neal and rapeseeC neal using grov;ing pigs fi-tted<br />

'¡¡ith re-entrant cannulae placed at the enC of the i.leu¡n.<br />

Apart fron specific prctein sources, ce:'eal- grains<br />

suppl¡,r a lar.:e prooortion of the total Cietery protein in<br />

oractical diets for swine end poultr"'. In adiition, cereal<br />

grains are the n:a,'or source of protei-n for the hunan population<br />

in manlr developing countríes. Data rega:.ding faecel<br />

anino acid availabilities fron cereel grains can be found in<br />

the literature. Iìowever, =ssentially no inforr.lation on ileal<br />

availabilities, which na¡r be nore accurâte indlces, is<br />

av: ilable .<br />

The nain objective of the studies that 'rere carried<br />

out was to determine to vJhât extent ileal and faecal anino<br />

acid availabilities fron cereel greins differed. ft was also<br />

atten:pted to deternine which phl'sical and,/ or che¡:ical fractions<br />

\dere responsibl-e for the discrepêncy between total and<br />

availabl-e enino :cid content fron th.e c:real Ê::eins. Th=<br />

latter knovrledge Ì:ta' be o-f inportance to plant breeders in.<br />

their cuest for inproving the prctein oualit1' of cereel grains.<br />

The pig was chosen as experir::ntel åninal . First<br />

of all , this eninal can be fítted with re-entrant cannul-ae.<br />

SeconCll', it is generall-¡ felt that infornation obteineC frcn<br />

the pig is acplicabl3 to acst other nonogestric sp-^cies.<br />

¿


REI/Ï:],1I OF lHE LITEF.A.TURJ<br />

The quelít.v of cereal protein ls pcor beceuse cf the<br />

1ow content of son:e amino acids that are essentiel for grcvrth<br />

anci other forns of production. The liniting aminc acids cf the<br />

na;or cereal grains fed to pigs and rats are shown j.n Teble I.<br />

References were selected in which bcth the first and secondlin:iting<br />

(and sometimes thirci- l imit ì-ng anino aciis) were<br />

deter¡nineci. L¡rsine and THR were fcund to be the first and<br />

se c cnd -lir:it ing eminc aciCs respectivell/ fcr barlelr, o¿ts,<br />

rice, rye, tritJ-cele and. wheet. Tryptophen end LYS were fcunC<br />

to be the first and seccnd-limitlng anino acids respectivelir<br />

for corn fed to growing cr fínishing pigs (Eaker et al.,I9(9;<br />

Cello and Fond, 1968). The order of limiteticn cf these anino<br />

acid.s v,'a s reversed when ccrn was fed tc t'abi' pigs (Ga^llo et al. ,<br />

L97L). Ðue to dif.ferent anino acid reouirements for srcwth and<br />

naintenence (liclaughlan, 1972 ) . fectors such as the leve1 cf<br />

protein tested and the ege of the enirnal mal¡ deternine r,rhich<br />

¿nino acid of 2 nearll. ecuall;, liniting amino aciis will be the<br />

nost linitíng. îhe sulfur containing aninc ecids heve been<br />

shovrn to be ihird-limiting fcr corn, oats, anci tritical-e<br />

(te¡re t ) .<br />

L¡rsine, 1n addition to being usuelllr the ncst iirniting<br />

:,nino acid for pigs end rets, was alsc found tc be the least


1'ABLE 1.<br />

ITEI,TS<br />

CEREAL GRAÌN<br />

Barl e y<br />

Corn<br />

Oat s<br />

Rice<br />

Rye<br />

Triticalo<br />

Vlheat<br />

Rye<br />

The limiting amíno acids for<br />

only protein.<br />

Fírst-Limiting<br />

Arnino Acid<br />

LYS.<br />

TRY.<br />

TRY.<br />

T I¡C<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

LYS.<br />

Se c ond- Linriting<br />

Arnino Ac id<br />

THR.<br />

tYs.<br />

r-¡Iù.<br />

TRY.<br />

TRY.<br />

TRY.<br />

THR.<br />

T}IR.<br />

THR.<br />

THR.<br />

rats and pigs when cereal grain supply the<br />

Third-Limiting<br />

Amino Acid<br />

Ir.iET. ( cTS )<br />

IrnT. (cYs),TitR.,<br />

tLE., VAL.<br />

l,Í¡:1'. (cYS )<br />

THR. i'1.8?. (CYS)<br />

THR.<br />

THR.<br />

THR.<br />

Species<br />

raüs<br />

pigs<br />

pigs<br />

pigs<br />

rats<br />

rat s<br />

rat s<br />

rats<br />

rat s<br />

rat s<br />

pigs<br />

rat s<br />

rets<br />

Refe renc e s<br />

Howe et aI ., 1965.<br />

Baker e! aI ., Lg6gi<br />

Gallo and Pond, 1!ó8;<br />

Uesl"emer eù al . ,<br />

t970.<br />

Gallo g! aI ., 1968.<br />

Pond g! al ., 1971.<br />

RosenberE et aI ..<br />

r9ó0.<br />

Tang g! ÊÀ., 1958.<br />

Hovle gt aI . , 1965.<br />

Rosenbele et aI ..<br />

L959.<br />

Howe g! aL., 1965;<br />

I(ihlber¡- and !ìrl c son ,<br />

l96d; Iv,cLaughlan<br />

et al . , 1967.<br />

Shurnada and Cl-ine,<br />

L97t+.<br />

Shurnada and Cì-ine,<br />

L97 t+.<br />

I{owe et al .. 19ó5:<br />

l,rcl,auãñ'tãn- ét ár. l<br />

1P6l; Rosen6ãr[et<br />

al ., 1960.<br />

Howe et aI., 1965;<br />

Kihlberg and Eri c son,<br />

I96t+.<br />

+-


avâilable indi-spensable a¡ij-no acid frorn cereal grains when<br />

deterrained by the faecal anell¡sis rirethod (Eggun, 1973; Olsen<br />

et al. , 1968; Poppe and l.ieier, 1971; Sauer et el. , I97t+). The<br />

availabilities of TIIR and IIT were also found to be relativell'<br />

low in comparison to the availabilities of the other anino acids<br />

of cereal grains.<br />

Iiowever, the validitl¡ of the faecal anal¡,'sis nethod rna¡r<br />

be ouestioned on grounds of the more or les.s unknown effects cf<br />

the nicroflora of the large intestine on protein n:etabolisrn and<br />

this aspect will be díscussed in Part 2 of this I iterature<br />

revieur. Part 3 witl deal with âlternate rnethods for daternining<br />

anino aci.d availabilities. Factors in cereal graj-ns, and also<br />

of other protein sources that ma1' affect the availabil_ities<br />

of anino acids to the nonogastric animal will be discussed in<br />

Part 1 of this literature review.<br />

. True amino aciC availabilities are derived fron their.<br />

apparent availebilities by correcting the latter estinates for<br />

the netabolic faecal amino acid excreti-on. The metabolic faecal<br />

anino acid excretion is usuall1' deterrnined fron: faeces of<br />

aninals fed protein-free diets. Factors affectíng the netabolic<br />

faecal amino acid excretion have been extensivel¡r reviened pre-<br />

viouslr¡ (Sauer, 1972\ and, are sur¿r,¡arized as follolvs : I ) End.o-<br />

Éienous protein derived fron undigested resiCues .fro¡r sloughed-off<br />

cells r:ake up a nuch larger proportion of netebolic faecal<br />

protein than protein derived frora undigested digestirre<br />

secretions; 2) The level of sloughed.-off cells is nainl¡r<br />

E


deternined by the emount of undiEestible dr¡r malter in the diet<br />

Ït '¡ou1ci seerÌ to be ad¡¡isable to fcrnulete e protein-free diet<br />

ín such a rìenner that it contains the same âmount of und.igestible<br />

Cr¡r natter as the diet for whi ch one deterreines the true<br />

ânino aciC ar¡ailabilities. The latter nay be achieveci b;; including<br />

¿ certain emount of fiber in the protein-fr:e d j-ets.<br />

The test aninrals shculd elso be paír-feC the test and. protein-<br />

free diet in orCer to guerantee eoual inteke of undigestJ_ble<br />

dry matter; l) ?he Level a nd. type of protein is not thought<br />

to affect the r¿etebolic faecal arnino acid excretion. Factors<br />

affecting the ¡retabolic faecal amino acid excretion rvitl not<br />

be discussed in this review of literatu.re alihcugh the-r., ere<br />

f:'eouently referred to in the discussion part of this thesis.<br />

6


PART I.<br />

Cereal grain composition and factors<br />

affecting amino acíd availabilities.<br />

Ce¡eal protein can be separated into four major<br />

protein types b]¡ successj.ve solvent extractions on grOund<br />

rnaterial: 1) water, albumin; 2) salt solutions, globulin;<br />

3) 7O/' ethanol, prolamin; and 4) dilute alkali (oracid),<br />

glutelin. The nutritive value of cereal protein is<br />

primarily deternined by the amount of prolamin. Prolar¿in<br />

contains only small amounts of f,YS. Prolamin makes up<br />

approximately 50-55, 4O-5O, 35-45 and LO-I5/" of the total<br />

protein from corn, wheat, barley and oats respectively<br />

(Neurath and Bailey, L954J. the protein efficiency ratio<br />

of cereal protein in diets fed to rats hras 2.1 for oats<br />

(which has the Lovrest content of prolamin) and ranged. from<br />

I.4 to 1.7 for the other cereals (Jones et gL., 1948).<br />

Prola¡nin and glutelin constitute the protein from<br />

the endo sperü (inner) part of the seed. The albumin and<br />

globulin fractions are found primarily on the outer part of<br />

the kernel . iriore specifically, these are<br />

found in tire<br />

aleurone cell layer whose cells have a thick fibrous cell<br />

wal1 .<br />

The total protein content of a cereal grain wl1l<br />

largely be deternined by the climatic conditions under whÍch


it is grown. ït is fur*,her dependent on the particular<br />

variety of cereal grai-n and oû other facto:.s such as, the<br />

level of fertilizer application. u-nfavourable climatic<br />

conditions, such as, inadequate mo j-sture usually resul-t in<br />

a decrease in the -r,otal amount of enciosperm protej.n.<br />

Favourable conditions result in an increase of endosperut<br />

protein. Regardless of cli¡:atic conditions, the total<br />

amount of protein derived fror¿ albumin and globulin re-<br />

mains relatlveJ.l, s6n5¡æ¡. Consequently, protein fronr<br />

albunin and gLobulin contributes relatively more protein<br />

to the total amount of protein from cereal grains when these<br />

are grown unrier unfavourable rather than favourable<br />

clinati.c conditions. Protein cierived from albumin and<br />

globulin generally rnakes up a larger percentage of the<br />

totaL protein of a low protein cereal variety than of a high<br />

protein ceÈ'ea1 variety when grown under slmilar c.lir:atic<br />

conditions (Draper, 1973; Sodek ancÌ lnÍlson, 797L). Fertilization<br />

increases nostly the endospern proteins, resulting in a<br />

relative decrease in the proportions of albumin and globulin<br />

(Abrot eù al . , L97O)<br />

There ar.e considerable differences between the amino<br />

acid composition of the cei.eal protein fractions. in general,<br />

the a¡nino acid composition of a fraction in different species<br />

of cereal grai-ns tends to be similar. Therefore, the ariino<br />

acid content of a cereaL grain wilÌ largely be determined by


the proportion of each protein fraction i.t contains. The amino<br />

acid composition of the protein fractions from uheat and barley<br />

are shown in Table 2. The composibion of al"eurone protein from<br />

wheat r¡¡ould be indÍcative of the combined composition of albunin<br />

and globulin. Albunrin and globulin protein from both wheat and<br />

barley contai.n much higher levels of lhe basic amino acids (ARG.,<br />

HIS. and LTS.), ALA. and ASP. and nuch lower proporti.ons of GLU.<br />

and PRO. than prolamj.n and glutenin. 0f the endospern proteins,<br />

glutenin contained considerably more LYS. than prolanin especially<br />

wí.th regard to barley. Hiproly barley (high LIS. barley) contains<br />

relatively more glutenin than prolamin compared to other barley<br />

varieties.<br />

The irain differences in arnino acid conposition of the<br />

di.fferent proteín fractions from wheat and barley can also be<br />

detected in the protein fractions of corn (Sodek and lfilson,<br />

I97L). Robbins et al . (19?1 ) postulate simiLar differences between<br />

the proteia fractj.ons fron oats.<br />

The disproportionate contribution of amino acids by the<br />

different protein fractions is also shown by recalculated data<br />

from Horn et al. (1958). They deternined the composition of a¡¡ri_no<br />

acids in wheat products. Hard red winter wheab was experimentall¡,<br />

nitled. Straight grade flour of ?I.5/o extractíon, 16.)/" bran and<br />

7.9% short s was produced. îÌre data wee recalculated in order to<br />

obtain some idea about the quantitative distribution of ar¿ino<br />

acids in the wheat products (Table 3). Nitrogen from bran and<br />

shorts made up about 3O/o of the total nitrogen from wheat but 45Zo<br />

9


TABLE 2.<br />

CEREAL GRAÏN<br />

FRACTTONS<br />

AMTNO ACTDS<br />

Essentiel<br />

ARG.<br />

Hrs.<br />

rLE.<br />

LEU.<br />

LYS.<br />

¡,{ET.<br />

PHE.<br />

THR.<br />

VAL.<br />

Non-Ðs sentia I<br />

AtA.<br />

^eD<br />

GLU.<br />

CLY.<br />

., PRO.<br />

SER.<br />

TYR.<br />

I 2<br />

)<br />

It<br />

The amino acid compoaitlon of aleurone . protein, glutenin and prolamin<br />

from wheat and those of albumin, globulin, glutenin and prolamin from barley.<br />

1<br />

ALEURONE<br />

7.3<br />

3.6<br />

2.8<br />

5.5<br />

4.1<br />

L.2<br />

3.8<br />

2.9<br />

h.9<br />

l+.7<br />

7.3<br />

r5. o<br />

3"6<br />

4.1<br />

2.7<br />

tl,]HEAl<br />

2<br />

GLUTENTN<br />

4.I<br />

2.3<br />

3.7<br />

6.6<br />

2.3<br />

t.6<br />

4.8<br />

3.r<br />

l+ .2<br />

2.8<br />

3,7<br />

33.2<br />

3.8<br />

10.3<br />

5.U<br />

J.o<br />

2<br />

PROLA}{ÏN<br />

2.7<br />

2.2<br />

4.3<br />

6.9<br />

0.6<br />

1.4<br />

5.5<br />

2,2<br />

4.1<br />

2.o<br />

2.9<br />

)8.9<br />

1.5<br />

13 .8<br />

4.7<br />

2.6<br />

Stevens et eJ. , &963)<br />

Ewart (rØ7f<br />

Folkes anl TeÍûû (f956)<br />

Expressed as grams per 16 grams of nitrogen.<br />

3<br />

ALBUIviÏN<br />

13 .0<br />

4.3<br />

4.1<br />

5.8<br />

no<br />

1.4<br />

3.0<br />

3.1+<br />

5.ri<br />

ii.0<br />

8.7<br />

6.7<br />

4.2<br />

4.1<br />

2.7<br />

3<br />

GLOtsUTÏN<br />

22.o<br />

3.L<br />

2.2<br />

4.r<br />

6.3<br />

0.9<br />

¿.L<br />

2.4<br />

4.I<br />

o.7<br />

5,6<br />

6.8<br />

10.7<br />

.) al<br />

3.9<br />

I.5<br />

BARLEY<br />

GLUTENÏN<br />

L2.O<br />

u.3<br />

3.5<br />

l+.9<br />

4.8<br />

1.1<br />

2.7<br />

3.r<br />

t+.9<br />

6.6<br />

4,7<br />

11 .6<br />

5.2<br />

6.6<br />

4.2<br />

1.9<br />

PROI,AMTN<br />

6.(,<br />

¿.¿<br />

3.('<br />

3.5<br />

0.8<br />

0.8<br />

3.6<br />

I.9<br />

3.5<br />

2.2<br />

I.2<br />

23.o<br />

L.7<br />

L5.3<br />

3.2<br />

1.ó<br />

ts O


TABrE 3.<br />

CEREAL CO]'TPONENTS<br />

AM]NO ACTIS<br />

Es sential<br />

ARG.<br />

HIS.<br />

rLE.<br />

LEU.<br />

lYs.<br />

[{ET.<br />

PHE.<br />

THR.<br />

VA],.<br />

Semi- Es s ¡nt ---ES:-- iaI<br />

TYR.<br />

NTTROCEN<br />

DRY IIATTER<br />

The amino acld levels (,arl of<br />

distribution of aníno acids<br />

WHOLE<br />

IIIHEAT<br />

o.63<br />

o.3z<br />

o,62<br />

0.90<br />

0.38<br />

0.20<br />

o.7r<br />

O.lþ3<br />

0.59<br />

o.33<br />

o.36<br />

r .11<br />

0.44<br />

o.6t+<br />

o.95<br />

0.64<br />

0.21<br />

o.72<br />

o.55<br />

o.73<br />

o.2g<br />

o.37<br />

2.r9 2.57<br />

100.0 100.0<br />

0.19<br />

0.07<br />

0.l-1<br />

0. 16<br />

0.11<br />

0. 0lr<br />

0.12<br />

0.09<br />

0-12<br />

wheat and wheat by-products and the<br />

in wheat by-producùs .<br />

r.23<br />

o.l+5<br />

o.?5<br />

1.06<br />

o.77<br />

o.24<br />

o,78<br />

o,63<br />

0.83<br />

0.05 0.38<br />

0.06 o.Lt+<br />

o.43 2.82<br />

l.6,9 r_00.0<br />

0. r0<br />

0 .0t+<br />

0.06<br />

0.08<br />

0.06<br />

0.02<br />

0.06<br />

0.05<br />

o.o7<br />

0.03<br />

0.03<br />

0. 5r<br />

o.27<br />

o.59<br />

0.84<br />

0.28<br />

0.18<br />

0.68<br />

o.3?<br />

0. 51<br />

0.30<br />

o.3z<br />

o.36<br />

0.19<br />

o.42<br />

0.60<br />

0.20<br />

0.13<br />

0.49<br />

0.27<br />

0.38<br />

0.2L<br />

o.?3<br />

I.4l+<br />

7r.5<br />

Colunm A, B and C indicate the contribution of amino acids (grams) from bran, shorts<br />

and flour respectively to whole wheat (100 grams ).<br />

Colurnn Ð shows the percentage of amino acíds in whole wheat that are contained in<br />

bran and shorts.<br />

o.22<br />

2.o2<br />

r00.0<br />

2<br />

Ð<br />

t+6. o<br />

3l+,lr<br />

27 .l+<br />

26.7<br />

4t+.7<br />

30.0<br />

25.4<br />

32.6<br />

32.2<br />

24,2<br />

25,O<br />

29.7<br />

24.8<br />

F<br />

ts


of the total LYS and ARG r^res presen! in these fractions<br />

(Teble l; Colwnn D). the relativel-v- hígh Levels of j,YS and<br />

ARG in bran and shorts reflected the high concentrati-on of<br />

aleurone protein in bran ånd shorts, since nos.a, if not al1<br />

aleurone protein is found in these frsctions (Hinton et al..<br />

l-Çll; Shetler et å1. , L9l+7).<br />

Protein in aleurone celIs (albumin and giobulin) may<br />

be of linrited di-gestibilit¡r sínce the thick cellulosic cell wall<br />

of these cells is thought to interfere with digestion of the<br />

protein that is conta<strong>fn</strong>ed in these cel1s. A certain anount of<br />

this protein may also be tíghtly bound Lo the cellulosic nratrix<br />

of the aleì,rrone ce1ls (Saunders and Kohler, I9?Z). Saunders<br />

et aI. (f969) fed bran from hard red spring wheat to chicks.<br />

the contents of the lov¡er intesti_ne contained intact ce1ls<br />

from the aleurone layer. ÐÍgestion of bran consists essentially<br />

of the breakdown and absorption of the contents fron the<br />

aleurone cells which occurs only when the cetl wa11s are<br />

ruptured. The nunber of intact aleurone cells remaining in<br />

the lower intestine and in the faeces seemed. to be affected by the<br />

variety of wheat from which bran was d.erived and by the physical<br />

form in whi.ch bran was fed. Pel1eted feed resulted in a larger<br />

number of ruptured. aleurone ce1ls than mash based on mj-croscopi.c<br />

examinatÍon of intestinal contents and faeces.<br />

The true amino acid availabilities from corn, wheat<br />

and barley fed io gror¡ing pigs are shown in Table 4. <strong>fn</strong> general ,<br />

L2


TABLE 4.<br />

A,rrNo AcrDs (ø)<br />

Es se nti al -]m:-<br />

HÏS.<br />

ÏLE.<br />

]-,8U.<br />

I t¡c<br />

MET.<br />

DIJ!:T<br />

THR.<br />

VAL.<br />

Non--{s s e ntial<br />

ALA.<br />

ASP.<br />

GLU.<br />

CLY.<br />

PRO.<br />

SER.<br />

TYR.<br />

NTTN,OG}IN<br />

I 2<br />

True amino acid availabÍl1ties<br />

for growing pigs.<br />

93.7<br />

94.7<br />

92.O<br />

94.?<br />

90.5<br />

92.9<br />

92.1+<br />

94.5<br />

92.5<br />

9r.7<br />

9L.5<br />

95.3<br />

BB.2<br />

95.5<br />

93.L<br />

93.O<br />

llaster (L972)<br />

Eeeum (1973 )<br />

Sauer gr 9., (1924)<br />

CORN<br />

95.2<br />

93.5<br />

88.5<br />

92.8<br />

89.3<br />

93.6<br />

92,2<br />

89.8<br />

89.8<br />

93.O<br />

91 .1<br />

92.2<br />

89.6<br />

96.8<br />

93.O<br />

90.2<br />

95.O<br />

95.9<br />

90.3<br />

93.2<br />

84. r<br />

88.6<br />

92,o<br />

88.4<br />

90.8<br />

86.5<br />

87 .1<br />

97.1+<br />

89.7<br />

-t- _<br />

90.5<br />

or Ã<br />

91.8<br />

from corn, wheaù and barley<br />

9t+.7<br />

9t+.7<br />

89.2<br />

9r.2<br />

80.8<br />

89.8<br />

92.1+<br />

87 .3<br />

89.0<br />

8¿. r<br />

8t+.6<br />

97 ,o<br />

BB .3<br />

96.3<br />

92.8<br />

90 .3<br />

90.9<br />

88.9<br />

87 .6<br />

79.2<br />

84.l<br />

72.3<br />

80.7<br />

77.8<br />

82.5<br />

75.5<br />

77 .8<br />

90.4<br />

79.1<br />

88.1<br />

B3 .8<br />

8?.4<br />

BARLEY<br />

9L::4<br />

93.2<br />

8t+.7<br />

88 .7<br />

77.t<br />

87 .3<br />

90.1<br />

85.5<br />

87 .6<br />

80.6<br />

85.4<br />

93,3<br />

84. 3<br />

93,2<br />

89.9<br />

87 .6<br />

85 .8<br />

H


the avail-abilities decrease from corn to wheat and to barley<br />

and is inversely related. to the increase in the proportions of<br />

albunin and globulin from corn to flheat to barley. Protein<br />

from al-bumin and globulin rnakes up approxirn ately 5-6; 9-L5<br />

and 13 -24,4" of the total protein of corn, wheat and barle¡r<br />

respectively (Neurath and Eailey, I95t+). Postel (1957) sue-<br />

gested that since barley has a nulticellular aleurone layer, it<br />

should be higher in aleurone protein as a percentage of total<br />

protein compared wit,h wheat, which has a síng1e al_eurone layer.<br />

SeveraL workers suggested the relatively high concentration of<br />

LïS in aleurone protein to be responsible for its tov; availability<br />

from cereal grains (Eggu¡r, lpll; Iiunck, L96h; Sauer et ù.., I97b).<br />

The above hypothesis explains also the 1ow availabilities of<br />

ASP and Al,A and the high availabilities of GLU and PRO. i{owever,<br />

the high availabilities of ARG and TtfS and the relatively low<br />

availability of THR can not be explained in the sanre menner<br />

(Tables2 and 4).<br />

Other factors may affect protein digestibility and.<br />

therefore amino acid availability from cereal grains. Trypsin<br />

plays an important role j-n the digestion of protein. The extent<br />

of digestion by trypsin can be influenced by the amino acid<br />

sequence near the catalytic site. lrypsin exhibits a strict<br />

specificity for arginyì and 1ysyl peptide bond.s. The nu¡:ber of<br />

peptide bond.s split by trypsin wj-ll be dependent on the total<br />

anount of .A,RG and l,YS present in the protein (lÌilhalyi, L}TZ).<br />

r4


Lysylprolyl and arginyl pro1y1 línkages are completely resistant<br />

to tr.vpsin (EeIl, L954). Thus, a high PRO content coupled. with<br />

a low ARG and l,TS content might result j.n a less efficient<br />

digestion of a particular protein. This hypothesis would favor<br />

a relatj.vely high level of digestion of aleurone protein (if it,<br />

would be released from the aleurone ce1ls ) and a relatively 1ow<br />

leve1 of digestion of glutelin and prolanin. The rat io of PRO<br />

to ARG and LTS is parti-cularly high in prolamin (Table 2).<br />

The nunber of peptide bonds split by chymotrypsin<br />

would be dependent on the -r,otal amount of LEU and the aromatic<br />

anino acids , namely PHE and TfR.<br />

Protein digestion would also depend on the distribution<br />

of amino acid residues which are compatible with enzyme specificity..<br />

Plant proteins are highly organized folded conxpact structures.<br />

The relative distribution of the ttkeytr amino acid.s (ARG, LyS,<br />

L,EU, PHE and TIR) from the inner to outer part of a protein<br />

molecule may influence its effi"ciency of digestion by trypsin<br />

and ghymotrypsin.<br />

Heating pure proteins gives rise to the fornation of<br />

cross-tinkages between the E-amino group of LTS and the carboxyl<br />

groups of the dicarboxylic amino acids or their amides<br />

(B¡arnason and Carpenter, 1970). These conpounds are not<br />

absorbed (va[e-ni6stra and. Ëarnes, lr97O). The possibilit,y of<br />

such linkages occuring naturally in eereal protein should not<br />

be overlooked. Such a cross-link has been isolated from hair<br />

(ilarding and Rogers, L97I).<br />

L5


Of the cereal grains, barley and especially<br />

sorghun contain significanb amounts of tannins (thang<br />

and Fuller, 19ó4; Eserun, 1968). the true nitrogen<br />

digestibilities of 2Ç sources of barley, ranging in tannin<br />

content from 0.55 to 1.23f" ïere nieasured on rats (Eggu¡n<br />

and Christeasen, 1975). The tannin content was r,reasured<br />

accordíng to AOAC (1965) procedures. The nitrogen content<br />

of the 29 barley samples varied frorn 1.55 Lo 3.221ø. Therefore,<br />

the relationship betwêen nitrogen digestibility and<br />

content of nitrogen (which also affects nitrogen dige stibili-uy )<br />

aná tannin was determined by use of a mulliple regression<br />

equation, which was as follows: lÐ1 = 82.60 + 3.Sg<br />

x N (Ø) - 6.27 x tannin (íá) (Eeeun and Christensen,<br />

1975). For exaraple, barley containing 2.f nitrogen and, O.55,ii<br />

tannin and barlel/ containing 2/. nlLrogen and, 1.23% tannin<br />

will result in true nitrogen digestibilities of 86.9 and<br />

ð¿. ^^ ^.4 /)o respecllvely.<br />

. tr''Ihe at and rye, and to a lesser extent rice, oats<br />

and corn were found. to contain a trypsin inhibitor (iaporte<br />

-<br />

and Tremolieres, 1!62). The anti-trypsin factor seems to<br />

1TÐ,<br />

of nitrogen in<br />

bàr1ey.<br />

true nitrogen<br />

barley; tannin ciigestibility; N (ií): percentage<br />

lit): percentage of tannin in<br />

I6


e concentrated in the germ part of the cereal grains<br />

(l'loran et al ., f968).<br />

ïn conclusion, differences in anino acid<br />

composition between cereal grains can be partly attributed<br />

to the different amor¡nts of the l¡ rnajor protein fractions.<br />

The amount of aleurone protein contained within each<br />

cereaL grain is dependent on the clinatic conditions<br />

under which it is grown, the variety and other factors<br />

such as the level and type of fertilizer applicati.on. The<br />

amount of aleurone protein could be an inportant factor<br />

in determining anrino acid availabilities. The type of<br />

physicaÌ processing before feeding in turn would affect<br />

the availability of aleurone protein for digestion.<br />

Other limiting factors in the utilization of cereal protein<br />

may be the presence of undigestible peptides in the end.o-<br />

sperrn fraction (in relation to PRO levels), the levels and.<br />

distribution of nkeyr amj-no acids necessary for enzyrr:atic<br />

cleavage, the possibilíty of naturally occurrin6; cross-<br />

'l inkages and the presence of tannins and anti-trypsi_n<br />

factors.<br />

I7


PART 2.<br />

Protein metabolism in the large<br />

intestine of monogastric animals.<br />

Vilhen protein is ingested by the nonogastric animal<br />

it is subjected to digestion in, basically, two steps. ïn<br />

the first step, protein is subjected to h¡rdrolysís by the<br />

proteolytic enzymes that are secreted by the stomach and<br />

smal1 intestine. The second step consists of fernentation<br />

of undigested protein by the mícro-organisms of the large<br />

intestine.<br />

A very 1ow level of bacterial activity is found<br />

ie the stomach, duodenum and jejumum. Beginning wíth the<br />

distal part. of the ileum important activity can be detected.<br />

Bacterj.al activíty reaches its maximum in the caecu¡n and<br />

decreases fron there to the end of the large intestine<br />

(l,arson and Hill , 1960; inlichel 1961 , 1966).<br />

Protein, both of exogeneous and endogeneous nature,<br />

lhat is not digested. by the end of the srnall intestine v¡ill<br />

either -be excreted Ín the faeces or subjected to fernentation.<br />

Protein digestion by the rnicro-organi sms is brought about by<br />

extracellular enzynes through peptides of decreasing lengt,h<br />

to free amino acids to ammonia and short-chain fatty acids.<br />

Not necessarily all the free an¡ino acids prociuced will be<br />

18


degraded to ammonia and short-chain fatty acids. A certain<br />

proportion may be absorbed by the host animal (if amlno acid<br />

transport systems are present in the epithelial cells of the<br />

large intestine). t'iichel (1961 , 196ó, 1968) incubated a<br />

test amlno acid medium that had been inocuLated h¡ith caecal<br />

bacteria. All anino acids were broken down by deanination,<br />

decarboxylation or desulfhydration. However, of the amíno<br />

acids ARG, HIS, ASP, GLU, SER and THR were degraded the fastest.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> addition, eatabolic activity varied considerably from pig<br />

to pig and seasonal variati-ons were detected.<br />

The final nitrogeneous end product of protein<br />

digestion by the micro-organisns is ammonj-a. Amn¡onia ma;r s1.a<br />

be deríved from peptides, free anino acids and urea that enter<br />

the large intestine as such. The order of preferentíar fer¡nentation<br />

of nitrogeneous compounds by the {lora to yield amraoni a may<br />

probably be classífied as follows: 1) free amino acids and<br />

urea, 2) peptides, 3) soluble protein and 4) insoluble protein.<br />

Ànmonia produced from the nitrogeneous compounds in<br />

the large intestine may be taken up by the nicro-organisms and.<br />

be used for de novo microbial protein synthesis. In short,<br />

a certain anount of protein restructuring and correspond.ing<br />

changes in the proportions of amino acids will take place in the<br />

large intestine. 0n the other hand, a certain anount o.f the<br />

anmonia that is produced in the large íntestine nay be directly<br />

absorbed by the host animal. Part of the bacterial protein<br />

L9


will be excreted as such in the faeces. part will undergo<br />

proteol¡'sis during autodegradation of ihe micro_organi srns .<br />

Ðegradation, as opposed to synthesis, will take over as lhe<br />

micro-organisms move down the large intestine. This is<br />

probably partly due to a decrease ín nutrients available<br />

for the nicro-organisrns. The major end product of proteolysis<br />

of bacterj-al protein is am¡nonia. ËLood draining the co1on,<br />

especially that of the disral part, contains very high revels<br />

of ar¡nonia (trichel , 1966).<br />

The level of bacterial fermentation in the large<br />

intestine has been shown to be affected by the nature of the<br />

carbohydrate portj.on of the diet. i;iason and palmer (192¡ ) fe¿<br />

a diet 'r,o rats that contained egg albumin as the protein<br />

source (r4/" ) an¿ rice starch as the carbohyd:"ate source (soll).<br />

Replacement of rice starch by cornstarch did not increase the<br />

faecar nitrogen excreti-on but a significant i-ncrease was found<br />

when rice starch was replaced by raw potato starch. The<br />

authors suggested that raw potâto starc¡r was digested -,, o a<br />

lesser extent in the small int,estine than corn or rice starch.<br />

Therefore, more carbohydrate l:as available from potato starch<br />

than fron rice or cornstarch to the flora of the large intestine<br />

for fernentation of undigested exogeneous or endogeneous protein<br />

residues. T'he increase in faecal nitrogen excretion due to<br />

dietary inclusion of raw potato starch was associ_ated viith a<br />

pararlel i-ncrease in diaminopi¡¡leli c acid (ÐApÀ) excretion.<br />

20


DAPA is an amino acid that is onÌy found in sorne specíes of bac-<br />

teria and the amount present in faeces would roughly indlcate<br />

the relative amount (not absolute amount ) of microbial synthesis<br />

occurring in the large intestine. ït should be kept in mind Lhat<br />

a certain amount of ÐAPA is also degraded in the large S.ntestine<br />

(Ifason and I'lilne, L97I).<br />

Freeze-dried cod ¡nuscle protein was found to have an<br />

apparent nitrogen digestibility of 90 and 89/" in intact and<br />

caecectomized chicks respectÍvely. Heat-damaged cod nuscle<br />

protein had a nitrogen.digestibility of 77 and. 68fi for intact<br />

and caecectomized chicks (Nesheim and Carpenter, 1966). In<br />

other words, caecectony onl)¡ affected the nitrogen digestibility<br />

of the heat-damaged cod muscle protein. Fernentaticn by the<br />

r¡licro-organisms in the large intestine of the chick for the<br />

utllization of poorly digestible protein was also suggested by<br />

Nitsan (1965) in the digestion of raw soybeans and by Payne<br />

et al. (I9ó8) in the digestion of deteriorated fish concentrates.<br />

Therefore, the nature and or leve1 of undigestible protein, in<br />

addition to carbohydrate digestibility, will also be a factor<br />

that determines the level of bacterial ferÍxentation that takes<br />

place in the large intestine.<br />

fiith germfree (Cf ) aminals it is possible to study<br />

protein metabolism in the animal itself and not the combined<br />

metabolism of the host aninral and its flora. Combe et a1 .<br />

2I


(f965) found twice as mucli sol-uble ni-r,rogen and 50 to tOO<br />

tÍmes as nuch .iree anrino acicis in rhe caecun of GF rals chan<br />

in *"he ceecum of conventional (CV) rats. The ratio of urea<br />

to anmonia was also nruch higher in GF than in CV rats. The<br />

latter is due *"o the absence of bacterial urease in the<br />

ceecu.lnÌ of GF rats. iii.ea accounted for at least 25ii oî 1.rne<br />

faecal nitrogen in GF rats, whereas onì-y traces were found<br />

in the faeces of CV rats (Evrard et aI ., L96\,). Similar<br />

observations were made on GF and CV chicks (Salter and<br />

Coates I97A, L97L) .<br />

lr.ost reports show that GF aninals excrete rûore<br />

faecal nitrogen than CV animals. Hoet g! a1 . (1964) and<br />

L,evenson and Tennant (f96) found twice as nuch faecal nitrogen<br />

excretion for GF rats. tombe et aI . (f965) founci d.ifferences of<br />

a smal-ler rrragnitucie, naneLy JCÍ,. i..iller (L967) and Salier and<br />

Coates (I97L) obtained simil-ar results for GF and L;V chicrs.<br />

However, Lucke5' (1963) found no differences in faecal nitrogen<br />

excretion between GF and CV rats. As was explained prerriousl¡r,<br />

the levei of bacterlal fermentation nay be affected b1, the<br />

digestibility co.efficients andr/or nature of the dietary<br />

carbohydrate and protein. These factors may partially explain<br />

the variabie resul!s obtained betv/een the faecal nJ.trogen<br />

excretion from GF and CV animals. Fæ exanple, a high15'<br />

digestible diet fed to GF and CV an͡cals may only result in


minimal differences between the 1evels of faecal nitrogen<br />

excretion. And indeed, the diet used by Luckey (f963 ) r^¡iro<br />

found no differences between the faecal nitrogen excretion<br />

from GF and CV rats, was of a highly ciigestible nature.<br />

The higher levels of nitrogen in the caecum of<br />

GF rats contribute to the higher levels of faecal nitrogen<br />

excretion. Hor^rever, there still is a net disappearence of<br />

nitrogen between the end of the ileum and the rectun<br />

(Ioesche, 1968). The levels of digestive enzy!¡es are nruch<br />

higher in the contents of the caecum of GF rats than in the<br />

caecum of CV rats (Loesche, 1968). Nornal digestion may<br />

thus proceed longer in GF animals. In addition, the free<br />

amino acids produced wilL be available for absorption by the<br />

animal since they are not subjected to deanination by the<br />

micro-organisms to yield arnmonia and short-chain fatty acids<br />

which can be used for de novo microbial protein synthesis.<br />

The micro-organisms of the large intestine have been<br />

strongly inpl"icated in the recovery of endogeneous protein.<br />

The Ievels of digestive enzymes and mucotrE oteins in caecal_<br />

contents and faeces were found to be much higher in GF than<br />

in CV animals (Ðorgström et aI . ,1959; Lindstedt et al . ,1965;<br />

Loesche 1968). Salter and Fulford (1974) concluded that the<br />

micro-organisms are only important with respect to the degra-<br />

dation and recycling of endogeneous protein and that they âre<br />

ta


of ninor importance in the degradation of dietary prclein.<br />

A protein-free diet and a diet containing poorljt digestible<br />

protein (heat-dar':raged egg albumin) were fed to GF and CV<br />

chicks. The endogeneous nitrogen excretion was higher for<br />

the GF than CV chiclcs. They found no difference between the<br />

GF and CV chicks that were fed the heat-darnaged egg albumin<br />

diet. Iiotnrever, as was pointed out by the authorsr themselves,<br />

they inair have heat damaged the protein too severelrv. Even<br />

nicro-organisns can not completely breal:dov/n tco severel¡r<br />

heated proteins (Srbersdobtçr and Riedel , Lg?O). In contrast<br />

soine bacterial ciegradation oí poorly digestible protein<br />

(fron heat-damaged fish protein) was shown by work by<br />

Carpenter and Nesheim (1966) and by Payne g! g!. (1966).<br />

The form in ¡r'hich ni-trogen i s absorbed in the large<br />

intestine will determine the possible benefit that the hosl<br />

aninal might derive from the micro -organi sms . ïf nitrogen<br />

were absorbed as arnmonia it would general-ly be of limited<br />

value to the animal-. <strong>fn</strong> certain instances, ammonia iaay improve<br />

the protein status of animals fed low protein diets because more<br />

non-essential amino acids can be produced and this in turn nay<br />

have a trsparing effectrr on the essential amino acids in the<br />

bod;r.<br />

.<br />

Salter and Coates (I97Ll fed freeze-dried and<br />

autocla¡,'ed IôC-1"b"11"d esg vrhite +"c GF and CV chicks. I,lo


difference was found. betr¡¡een the 14C : N ratios of the digesta<br />

fron GF and CV chicks in the upper gut. However, the ratios<br />

were consistently higher for CV animals j-n the lower gut.<br />

Their findings can be explained by bactería} proi:eolysis<br />

and deamination of ar¿ino acids with subsequent absorption<br />

of ammonia. They also reported that the level of an¡:onia<br />

in caecal contents was five tinres greater in the CV than in the GF<br />

chicks. In additíon they found a higher excreij.on of uric<br />

acid by the CV animals. Ì¡larren and lrÏewton (1959) detected a<br />

fourfold increase in ammonia concentration in the portal<br />

blood of CV as compared to GF guinea pigs.<br />

Salter et a1 . (L974) fed several poor quality proteins<br />

to GF and CV chicks and deternined the net protein utilization<br />

(XIPU) by nitrogen balance ¡nethods. NPU determinatj.on would<br />

be a good indicator of whether the host ani¡:al derives<br />

anl¡ nutritional benefit from the action of the r,ricroflora.<br />

Poor quality proteins were represented by sesame protein,<br />

which is deficient in LIS, and by heat-damaged egg albumin<br />

and cod nuscle. A relatively large proportion of the latter<br />

protei.ns v¡ould remain undigested in the snal1 intestine and<br />

would be available for microbial fernentation in the large<br />

intestine (unless too severely heated). They founci no<br />

differences in NPU between GF and tV ciricks for eiiiier the<br />

heat-damaged egg albunin or cod muscle. There was a sl_ight<br />

25


ut significant difference between GF and CV chicks fed<br />

sesame protein but t,his could not be confirmed in later<br />

studi-es. ilith t,he heat-damaged proteins, the excretion of<br />

uric acid tended to be higher in CV than GF chicks. The<br />

authors conclude that most of the nitrogen that disappears<br />

from the large intestine is in the form of amr¡onia and<br />

that the microflora merely chang e the route of nitrogen<br />

excretion. The latter could be of help to the protein<br />

status of aninals fed Iow protein diets.<br />

Wysocki and Baker (I972) studied bacterial protein<br />

digestion in the equine lower gut. 14C-1"b"II"d bacteria<br />

were infused into the caecurn of a caecal-fistulated pon3r<br />

that was anaesthetj-zed. Negligible anounts of 14C were<br />

detected in the deproteinized plesna amino acid fraction<br />

of portal blood. They suggest the conversion of bacterial<br />

protein to ammonia upon autodegradation of the nicro-<br />

organisms. However, in a similar type of experiment,<br />

Slade g! g!. (Lglir) showed that rnicrobial protein can be<br />

degraded to yield amino acids r,rhich are absorbed in the<br />

caecum of the horse. However, the rnagnitude of absorption<br />

and therefore the nutritional significance was not established.<br />

Hoover and Heítman (I975) found considerable fermentation of<br />

l4C-a1anin" in both the caecum and upper col-on contents of<br />

rabbi.ts, but there was little abso:'ption of f40-alanine<br />

26


into the bL ood .<br />

.{minc acid availability estirnates determined by<br />

growth nethods are generall,w lower than those determined by<br />

the faecai" analysls met,hod (Oal-houn et al ., 1960; Gupta et aI .,<br />

l-958; de ì,uel-enaere ei aI ., L96?; iriesheim and Carpenter L967).<br />

Bacterial degradation of amino acids to ammonia in the large<br />

-intestine may be the reason for overestir¿ation oí the actual<br />

amino acid avaiiabilities as deiermined by the faecal<br />

analysis method.<br />

îo summarize what was discussed, bacterial<br />

degradation of und.J.gested protein in the large intestine<br />

results in the for¡ration of ammonia as the nrajor nitrogeneous<br />

end product. Ammonia nay then be absorbed by the animal or<br />

may be taken up by the rni cro-organi sms for de novo microbiaL<br />

protein synthesis. Part of the microbial pro-r,ein will be<br />

excreted as such in the faeces while part of the micro-organisms<br />

will undergo autodegradation. Autodegradation of microbial<br />

protein results in the production of an:nonia as the r:ajor<br />

enciproduct, which j-s absorbeci by the host animaL. Thus, a<br />

certaj-n anount of protein restructuring will take place in<br />

the large intestine fronr undigested exogeneous and endogeneous<br />

protein with r.esultant changes in the prooortions of anino<br />

acids. Consequently, amino acid availabilities deternined with<br />

the faecal analirsis nethod could be i.naccurate. As was pointed<br />

out, the degree of inaccuracl/ nay be depenrìent on ciietary<br />

factors such as cerbohydrate and protein digestibility.


PART 3.<br />

Ðeterrnination of amino acid availabilities<br />

by ileal sanpling from cannulated animals,<br />

by ileal sampling from sacrificed animals,<br />

. by removal of the caeeum and<br />

by aid of germ-free and antibiotic treated animals.<br />

Several approaches can be made to determine anino<br />

acid availabilities that may or may not be partially confound.ed<br />

by protein metabolism in the lower gut. Each approach has<br />

its partÍcular advantages and disadvantages.<br />

Ileal sampling by eg4nulation: liiore vaÌ.id amino<br />

acid availability estimates wil1 be obtained. when the digesta<br />

are collected at the end of the ileun as conpared to faecal<br />

collections.<br />

Continuous collection of ileat digesta at the end<br />

of the ileum can be achieved by the use of í1eal re-entrant<br />

cannulae (Holnes et al ., I97l+'Ì or by ii-eal-caecal re-entrant<br />

cannulae (Easter , I97 Zl . Ileal--caecal cannulae were found to<br />

cause fewer problems in ¡saintaining an unrestricted flow<br />

(Easter, 1972). Use of the ileal re-entrant system will give<br />

a closer approximation to the digestive processes in situ as<br />

compared. to the use of the ileal-caecal re-entrant system.<br />

The latter system bypasses the ileal-caecal valve and all<br />

digesta passes through the caecum flrst before entering the<br />

colon. About one-third to two-thirds of the ireal flow enters


into the colon directly under normal conditions, while the<br />

remainder enters into the caecuro (Farrell and Johnson , L972;<br />

Ho1mes et al. , 1974).<br />

Surgical modifÍcations of the digestive tract,<br />

such as the incorporation of re-entrant cannulae will in all<br />

likelyhood slow down the rate of passage of digesta. Pu1se et<br />

at. (19731 studied the effects of caecal fistulation upon<br />

nutrient digestion and rate of passage in horses. . They found<br />

significant increases in crude fiber and. ether extract<br />

digestion following fistul-ation. Dry maller, gross energy<br />

and crude protein digestibilities did not change. Retention<br />

tines of chronic oxide and pol:/ethelene increased significantly.<br />

Easter (1972) deter¡nined the apparent ileal and<br />

faecal anrino acid availabilities of corn and sorghum grain in<br />

pigs, using ileal-caecal re-entrant cannulae. .t-aecal<br />

availability values were significantly higher than ilea1<br />

estinates. The difference varied for each amino acid,<br />

ranging fronr 10 percentage units for TTR to JO percentage units<br />

for GLY for both cereals. Lysine is often the most limiting<br />

amino acíd for pigs fed corn or sorghum grain. the ileal and<br />

faecal l,IS avaitabilities from corn were 65 and 85,4" respectively.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> the sarne order, they were 59 and 78% for sorghum grain.<br />

Therefore, the faecal analysis method may overestimate the<br />

actual LYS availabilities fron corn and. sorghum grain to a<br />

relatively large extent.<br />

)o


äoLmes et aI . (L974) determined the ileaL and<br />

faecal anino acici availabili-'bi.e s from soybean neal (SEì.i)<br />

and :'apeseed neal (RSI"I) using pigs fitted with ileal<br />

re-enrrant cannulae. The disappearance of nitrogen in<br />

the large intestine was 9 and L6fà for SEìi and R.Sì,i respectively.<br />

l,'i ith the exception of ÀRG and l,,i:.1T, the faecal<br />

availabilities of the essenti.al amino acids were higher than<br />

their corresponding i1ea1 availabilities. The dj.fference<br />

varied .frorn 5.7 for IÍAL to 1.2i4 for LYS from SBij and from<br />

U.ó for VÁ,l to !.2,,:i îor äIS frorn F,Si,i. iu.ethionine is eften<br />

a lindting amino acid for pigs fed SLi,i or RSI'. and the ileal<br />

and faecal availabilities were 96.7 and Z9.ll respect;ve1l, for<br />

SE],{ and 92.5 and 81 .0;l respectively for RSl.i. <strong>fn</strong> other vÍords,<br />

there was more bacterial s;,'nthesis than degradation of i,ËT.<br />

and its availability vras underestinaled by the faecal<br />

analysi.s method. lTith the exception of CyS and TyR, the faecal<br />

avail-abilities of the non-essential amino acids were higher<br />

than thei¡' corresponding ileal availabilities. The dis-<br />

appearance of PF.O was the most extensive and was approxlmately-<br />

25 percentage uníts for both SEi; and RSi,i.<br />

Collection of ileal diEesta from sacrificed. animals.<br />

Cho et al . (1971), using pigs fi_tted with ileal<br />

re-entrant cannul_ae, detected marheci differences between the<br />

amino acid cornposition of i1eal digesta that was collecteci<br />

3o


during different time int,erval_s following ingestion of -r,he<br />

test diets (SEì". and i.S;i) b)' the ani¡na1s. Fract j-onat j-on<br />

of dietary components in the stonach and to a lesser extent<br />

in the smal1 intestine is probably responsibJ-e for -,.he<br />

variation in the composition of ileal digesta. The work<br />

by Cho et al-. (1971 ) suggests the necessity for a contj_n-<br />

uous colLection of the dígesta from the ileu¡n as can be<br />

performed by :'e-entrant cannulae. Consequeni:ly, amino<br />

acid availabilities, determined from sanples taken from<br />

the end of the small intestine from sacrificed ani-nal s<br />

rnay be inaccurate since these are dependeni on the tine<br />

at which the animal is killed following ingestion of a<br />

-r"est ¡rea1 . <strong>fn</strong> addition, it is ofte¡r very Cifficult to<br />

obtain sufficient sarnple for anal],sis when only the digesta<br />

near -r,he very end of the sma11 in.Lestine from sacrifíced<br />

animals is collected. Cne often has to take all the digesta<br />

from a relati vely large section of the ileum.<br />

R.enoval of the cae cu¡:.<br />

This surgical procedure results only in a partial<br />

decrease of total bacteriar- acti'ity in the large intestine.<br />

Eacterial activit¡r in the colon renains.<br />

Lloyd et a1 . (f.958) studied protei-n d.igesrion in<br />

whole and caecectonized pigs, ranging in ege frorn B to 2B<br />

lveeks. The renoval cf the caecum resulted. only in a slight<br />

decrease in protein digestibility. Caecectomy in chiclcs<br />

3r


decreased the protein Cigestibilitr¡ of heat-danaged<br />

cod rauscle from 77 to 68:¿ (t,íesheir¿ and Carpent er , 196Z ) .<br />

Specific amino acid availabilities have not been studied wilh<br />

caecectonrized animals.<br />

Gerrnfree ani¡nals: Diets fed to GF aninals must be<br />

sterilized by either heat, radiatíon or chenical agents. Even<br />

well-defined diets nay undergo changes of uncertain character.<br />

The use of GF anj.¡ral s is linited lo sraall laboratory specj-es<br />

onl=y.<br />

Gorcion and Víostnann (1960) reported lower weights<br />

of the smal-l intestine of GF than in CV rats. The rate of<br />

renewal of the nucosâ of the sriall intestine tras :'educed in<br />

the GI rats (Äbrams et ai., L963). The surface area of the<br />

sna1l intestine rvas reduced in the CF rat and r,¡a s 3 Ofã less<br />

than in CV rats (Gordon and Eruckner-jiardo ss , 19ól). The<br />

changes described nay have an effect on protein digestion<br />

and amino acid absorption in the snall intestine. Tlius,<br />

digestion data obtained fron GF animal_s shoulci be ca:.efuilv<br />

interpreted.<br />

ireatment, with antibiotics.<br />

The characterj-stics of the snall intestine of<br />

aninals receiving relativel5r large anounts of antibiotics<br />

approxima',"e these of GF animals, particularly with regard.<br />

to the reduction in t,hickness of the snall intestine<br />

(Fauconneau and irlichel , l-gTO) .<br />

32


ì.',ril;en (I952) Cet:rr:ineC the faecal a::i::o acj.d<br />

availabilities fz.cn ccttonseeC ::eet uith or :.¡:-thout suLi-<br />

^!'-.: ^.-^1 ^ | ^L - .f ---^l -..' ..' ;- -.^^ *^-..On). Ft:Cal_ a::inO<br />

ecli avail a'ci1i'r.ies r,lei-e not cheng3d b;: su:pl enenta t,ion of<br />

the antibiotíc. Faecal_ anino scid availabil ities obtaineC<br />

wi+.h rats fed ba:.1e;' supple::renteC. v.¡!th chl orr- etrå c;- cl ine<br />

(20 pp:) or s;.1f:thiazcLe ( 2',", i:r the diet) r"¡ere sli¡htli-<br />

higher than those obtainei .fron rats thet were fei ba:'le;'<br />

r¡i'uhout *.ire an:ibiotics (iggun, L973), lhe Ciíierences fo:.<br />

the indi';idual aEÍno acids ranged fron 1 to 5 percentage<br />

ft is reasonable to assunie that a red.uction occuxs<br />

in total bacte:'ial actir¡itl¡ upon dietar;' antibio.uic supple_<br />

:Íêntaiíon. The extent to l¡hich this occurreC (ì-.e. 'c5.<br />

'caeteri.al count,s on feecel naterial ) nas no-,, neasure.d by<br />

l'iuiken (L?52) arcì ìgg..n (L9?3).<br />

33


\f rì/.l.' I<br />

¡.__L- _:ii---:ù .L-i..J _. _: i-- JJJ<br />

lìigh and 1ow p¡ç¡3i¡ s¡rê.ins of '¡he at (13.3 an¿<br />

LL.2:,), anri barl-e:' (11-.1+ end g. 5i.\ v:ere se1:cted fcr test<br />

Furposes. lt lvas nct possible tc cbtain high and low<br />

l:ctein st:'ains cf the sene :,.¿ii:t-'. Th: high prot:in<br />

wl::at lvas of the Glenlea ¡¡arietl,. whiie the iow prctein<br />

vil:ee t ì,^re s cí an unkncnn varlet j¡. The hi¡h end low prote in<br />

i:a:'1e1. were oÍ +.he Fergus anC Terta ve -l. j-e t j.- respectir,,"Jl-1¡,<br />

-¡.11 rrai:rs v;e re purchaseC Cii'ectlv frc¡:l far:-:rs.<br />

The kernels v¡er-e e'ora sei b;: aid cf e s¡nall<br />

la'ccratcr.' pearling r:iachine tc ..'ieid the rendosceÌ.n[ end.<br />

rlcï'entt fracticns. The ab:-aseci k-ernels v..¡e re naneC the<br />

endcsperm frection, The h ig.hl¡,' jlbrcus feed ieft after<br />

pearling rvas nameC the bran fracticn, ft 'r¡as attenËteC bjr<br />

p?erling to ebrese the kernel-s in such â nanner that ail<br />

¿leurcne protein tvcuid be ccnteineC in the 'cr.an íracticn.<br />

in acidi'r,ion, it was etter::Þtei to :rininize c:rr1..-cver ci<br />

endcspern prct,ein intc the bran fr.acticn. The ker.nels,<br />

5C 4 at a ti¡ne, 1¡rere peerled at intervals oí ¿. consecutiye<br />

seccnis. This wês repeeted , tir.es fcr. each tir.e of<br />

ebrasion. ìue to the harclness cf its !ç3r-noì s il¡a I,-r.,<br />

3l+


protein wheat was abrased at intervals of g Ínstead of l¡<br />

consecutive seconds. The abrased parts hrere poored together,<br />

weighed and analyzed for nitrogen. The concentration of<br />

nitrogen in the fractions obtained during each time intervat<br />

of abrasÍon are shown in Tabte 5.<br />

As was pointed out in the review of literature,<br />

the outer layers of the cereal grains contain the aleurone<br />

ceI1 1a1'ç¡. 0f these layers, the aleurone cell 1ayer has<br />

the highest protein content. There was a mariced. depression<br />

in the nitrogen content at the t+O-Lg, 24_28 and 20_24 second<br />

interval for low pro-,.ein wheat, high and 1or^r protein barley<br />

respectively (Table 5). <strong>fn</strong> the sarne order, the kernels of<br />

these grains were routinely abrased for dg, Zg and. 24<br />

seconds untíl sufficient a¡rounts were obtained of the bran<br />

and endosperrn fractions for test purposes. For the high<br />

protein wheat there was a depression in the nitrogen con_<br />

tent of the fraction obtained in the L6-20 second interval .<br />

Hov¿ever, the nitrogen content of the fracti-ons that follor¡¡ed.<br />

increased until it was marlcedly depressed again at the<br />

fraction collected in the )2-36 second interval . Eased on<br />

the se dala , it r,i¡as de cided to abrase the high protein<br />

wheat for 20 seconds.<br />

As will be di.scussed later, the high protein wheat<br />

should perhaps have been abrased ror 36 seconos in orcÌer ¿o


TABLE 5. Percent nitrogen of v¡heat and barley fractions<br />

obtained at different ti¡ce intervalå of abrasion.<br />

CEREAL GRAIN WHEAT<br />

LEVET, 0F PRoTETN (ø) 18.3 u.21 11.¿ 8.1<br />

ÎTME IIYTERVAL OF<br />

-@-(Eãõnds)<br />

0-4<br />

4-8<br />

8-L2<br />

L2-t6<br />

L6-20<br />

20-2t+<br />

2b-28<br />

28-32<br />

32-36<br />

36-h,o<br />

40-44<br />

44-48<br />

l+8-52<br />

Ê,t-14<br />

o.96<br />

3.L9<br />

l+.LIt<br />

lr. l+7<br />

3.10<br />

I+. l+5<br />

L.36<br />

3.6t+<br />

3.Ll+<br />

3.06<br />

2.86<br />

1.14<br />

t,o7 L.g5<br />

2.59<br />

2,L7 3.25<br />

3 'LI+<br />

2.69 2.9L<br />

a 1Ê<br />

..))<br />

2.56 2.r5<br />

2.24<br />

1.84<br />

1ÃO<br />

L.29<br />

2,50<br />

t.40<br />

2.18<br />

1.59<br />

1.20<br />

1 V.Lr.r"" in this column were<br />

I consecutive seconds (e.g. deterrnined at intervals of<br />

L.OV"N in 0-8 second iraãtion).<br />

36


obtain a aore conrplete seperation of the aleurone proiein<br />

fror¡r the endosperm proiein.<br />

The whole kernels and the fraciions obtained .,¡¡ere<br />

ground through a 2.00 m¡ screen, fortified with vitanins<br />

and minerals (Table 6)r nixed and nade into cru¡nbles. The<br />

crumbles were prepared as foLlows: the mixed diets were<br />

spread out into a thin layer of approximately O.25 cn.<br />

thickness, sprinkled wi.th water, kneaded loosely ínto small<br />

Itpefletsn of approximatety 0.5 cnr. diameter and dried. at<br />

50 oC in a forced drafi oven. The Ciets took on the<br />

appearance of crumbles.<br />

The test diets (Table 6) were fed for 4 days<br />

io 60 nale growi ng l{is-r,ar rats. Their ini-tia1 average<br />

weight was 98 g the day prior to the start of the test period.<br />

Each diet was individuatly fed to 5 rats each. The experinrent<br />

was repeated when the rats weighed IJO grams.<br />

Two protein-free diets containing lO and 20i3 alphafloc<br />

were fed to the same rats for a period of 2 days for -,,he<br />

determination of the netabolic faecal amino acid. excretion<br />

(Table 6). Faecal eollections from 2 rats, fed the sane<br />

prot,ein-free diet, vrere pooled on the basis of sinilar (or<br />

nearl¡r similar) dry rûatter intal


TÂBIE 6. Fo¡nuletion of test dielrs for study 1.<br />

CDREÂL<br />

COMPO¡¡ENT<br />

lngredtents (ø):<br />

ÏII'EAT<br />

l¡rhole 9).5<br />

Bran<br />

Endosperm<br />

BARI,ET<br />

!,lhote<br />

Bran<br />

Endosperî<br />

Sucroge<br />

Àlphafloc<br />

Soybean oLl 3.O<br />

CalcLìrl¡ carbonate L,3<br />

Dlcalclûnphosphate O,?<br />

Vita¡nin Þrenlx¿ 1.O<br />

Mineral iremix3 0.5<br />

HICH PROTEINïIHEÀT<br />

(rd.3ø)r<br />

WHOI,E BRI\N ENDO.<br />

W1IEAT SPERM<br />

LOIÍ PROTEIN<br />

v,rnEÂT (1r.2ø )r<br />

WIIOI,E BRAN ENDO. WflOT,E BRAN<br />

!.¡HEiIT SPERM BARLEÍ<br />

Velues ln parentheses lndicate the level of proteln es a peicent of dry natt€r,<br />

SuÞpued (kB díet): vltamin A ?150 Iûr vitânln D 818 IU: vtråntn E s-5 rtr!<br />

illiliö,ituil¡!,if;å.fíÌ31ïåå'å,i.;,î",i"iåån*"iiï ffiá"]l;8,ifå lil,låî,"<br />

penlcrl.l.ld-st¡epto¡lycln 2ö. l} ng.<br />

Suppued (kg diet)f l4anganese 8I.l¡ ng; zlnc It flg; l¡on 35.2 ngi coppet 6.6ngi<br />

iodlzed salt lr.7 C,<br />

93.5<br />

9r,5<br />

9J .5<br />

3.0 3.O t.o 1.O 3.0 3.o<br />

4.0 2.9 L.3 4,0 2,o r.3<br />

, 1,0 o.? 1.0 O.?<br />

1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 ¡. O<br />

o.5 0., o., 0., o.5 0:i<br />

IIIOH PROTETN<br />

BÁRI,EY (IT.4ø)<br />

9L.5<br />

3.O<br />

4.0<br />

1.O<br />

0.5<br />

LOIV PROTETN<br />

BARtEy (8.1ø )<br />

ENDO- WHOI,D BRAN ENDO.<br />

SÞEn¡r Ë]in¡¡r õilõñ¡,<br />

93 .5<br />

9L,5<br />

,,0 3,o 3.O 3.0<br />

2.O ¡..3<br />

2.0<br />

1.0 o,7 '+.O t. O<br />

l.o 1,0 1.0 1-O<br />

o.5 0,5 0,5 0.5<br />

PNOTDTN- TN¡E<br />

Lt/" 2@<br />

ALPHA- ALPHA-<br />

FI,OC I,'LOC<br />

81.O<br />

10. o<br />

5.O<br />

2,O<br />

r,o<br />

o.5<br />

oq<br />

7L.O<br />

20.0<br />

5.O<br />

0.,<br />

2.O<br />

l.o<br />

o.5


 basic diet (Giovannettj_ et âI ., lgTO) was fed<br />

when the rats Ïrere not on test. One percent ferric oxide<br />

was incorporated into this diet in order to permit easier<br />

identification and collection of faeces resulting from<br />

the test and protein-free diets. The besic and. proteinfree<br />

diets were fed as pelle'us of 1. ó cm. d j.aneter.<br />

The rats were housed individuall_y in suspend,ed<br />

wire-bottom cages, in an environmentally controlled roor¡<br />

at a temperature of 2loC. Feed and water were supplied<br />

ad libitum at all times.<br />

Originally, during the first collection when the<br />

rats hrere Íed the protein-free diets faeces were col_lected.<br />

in a tray. Filter paper was placed on the bottom of the<br />

tray. This was thought to result in only a smaLl anount<br />

of contamination of faecal pellets with urine. For<br />

inprovement of the collection rnethod, faeces were gathered.<br />

on a screen on top of the irays during the following<br />

collections.<br />

The total amount of feed consumed and faeces<br />

produced fron ihe test diets were recorded. Apparent anino<br />

acid availability estÍnates were deternined by neasuring the<br />

total amount of each amino acid ingested and lost in the<br />

faeces. ì''ietabolic faecal amino acid losses were considered<br />

for the estimation of true amino acid availabilities.<br />

39


Study 2.<br />

This study was subdj_vided into study 2a and 2b.<br />

Study 2a dealt with the determination of ileal and faecal_<br />

amÍno acid availabilities fron selectecl cereal graíns by<br />

use of pigs fitted with ileocaecal re-enNrant cannulae.<br />

Study 2b was caruied out to determine if faecal availability<br />

esti¡nates obtained frcm cannulated pigs were representative<br />

of ¡hose of normal pigs.<br />

Studv 2a.<br />

The apparent ileaI and faecal amino acid availabilities<br />

frorn barle¡' (Herta ) , comrnercial corn and .'¡heat (G1en1ea ) were<br />

determined with 6 lianagra barrows. Ì,ietabolic ileal and<br />

faecal amino acid levels were estimated with 2 purified diets<br />

containing 2 leveIs of fiber (Table 7).<br />

fl-eocaecal re-entrant cannulae were fitted to bar-<br />

rows weighing J9 to 43 kg. The animals weighed 75 to 82 kg. at<br />

the end of the experiment.<br />

the technique for re-entrant ileocaecal cannulation<br />

developed by traster and Tanksley (1973) for pigs was used.<br />

T¡rpe and size of cannulae used: a di.agrain of the t¡rpe<br />

and size of the cannulae used is shown in Fig. I. The can_<br />

nurae were made from polyvinyl chlorid e plastisol . The thickness<br />

of the cannulae is indicateci by the tiotteti. Ii nes in iiie<br />

side view of the diagran. The top view shows -r,he size of the<br />

40


TABLE 7. Fornulation of diets for study 2.<br />

DIETS<br />

LEVEL OF AIPHATLOC (ø)<br />

Ingredients (Ø):<br />

Barley<br />

Corn<br />

Vrlheat<br />

Soybean meal<br />

Cas ein<br />

Cornstarch<br />

Alphafloc<br />

Sucrose<br />

Soybgan oil<br />

Saltr<br />

Calciun carbonate<br />

DicaLcium phosphate<br />

Vltamin-antíbiórie<br />

'Premix2<br />

Chromic oxide<br />

GROWER<br />

82,50<br />

Lt+.50<br />

o.5o<br />

L.25<br />

o.75<br />

o.5o<br />

+<br />

97.OO<br />

0.50<br />

L.25<br />

o.75<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

97,O0<br />

o.5o<br />

L.25<br />

o.75<br />

0.50<br />

IIIHEAT<br />

97.40<br />

MAINTENANCE<br />

7LL<br />

Supplied,(kg diet): sodium chloride 4.i3 g; zinc ZO mg; iron 30 ng; manganese 6 mg,<br />

copper L6J ngi iodine .33 ngi cobaLr .ZO me.<br />

supnlied (tg ¿iet ): viramin A 22oo ru; vitamin D 33o lu; vltamln Brc r1-o uø:<br />

DL-o4-r'ocopheryt- acetar"_Il *s; rhiamine hydrochroriãã r.r'*eJ-.lbåÃ"iÅ"âi,2"fti,.<br />

calcium-D-pantothenate 100 mei pyrtdoxine'¡v¿roã¡iõri¿ã-ir.õ'reJ-.iËäiiüiã'ã"iå'<br />

1O.O mg; ASP-250 rg.<br />

+<br />

o.5o<br />

L.25<br />

o.75<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

4.00<br />

63.00<br />

7.OO<br />

2]-.50<br />

1.00<br />

o'50<br />

o.5o<br />

2.00<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

&.00<br />

63. oo<br />

ltl.00<br />

1lt.50<br />

t-.00<br />

o'50<br />

0.50<br />

2.00<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

ts


FIGUBE 1. Type and size of cannulae used.<br />

( flattened )<br />

I1ea1 Cannula<br />

Side View<br />

Front Vi.ew<br />

SCALE I:I


flarqes lçhen the se are fl-atteneC cu-,. The flanges -*e re<br />

ÌieCe in such a nênner as tc conícr-n to the lu:en of the<br />

il-e un ¿nC the c¿ecur (frcnt viet;). !he iIeaI an.j caecal<br />

cannulae tl'ere connecteC b¡,' aid of e j cn. co1'¡v inj¡l- c hlcrid e<br />

Pre and post-cperative care: the barrcr¡rs we:-e<br />

hcused in indi.¡id.ual netabolisn câEes icr ! da¡'s befcrr<br />

surgerl¡ was pe r.fcri::ed. The pigs '¡i e re stel.ved the dai.,<br />

before the operation ând wer.e siven therâÐeutic let-els of<br />

antibictics (Pen-Di-Strep) bi' intr-anuscular in-iection.<br />

l-dninistration o-f ântibiotics was continued e.,rerirdav after<br />

the operaticn until the anirnals seeneci to be reccvereC.<br />

pecovery was incicated b¡r hear ing cf the tissue arcund the<br />

cannr¡l-ae, nol'nal rectal tenperature ê.nC Ì'eturn tc nornal<br />

f:eC ccnsu¡npticn.<br />

The pies were given access to a 1icuiC diet for<br />

I ia¡.'s afr-er the cperation tc mininize biockage b¡, digesta.<br />

The licuid Ciet. ccnsisted cf 9 parts rvater and I pêr.t Ír.il_k<br />

replacer. Êloclcege cf diEesta ciu:'ing the fí:.st fer¡ Ca..s<br />

efter the cperation couli be vei'.'¡ cr.iticai. A.t this ste€e,<br />

there is no firn fibrcus aChesicn between the viscer.aiani<br />

Êarietel la"ors cf the p3riton€urìi, )ispla.cenent anC<br />

ìoss of cannulae is usuall¡r irreversible d.u:.ing this tine,<br />

unless the aninal is sub;'ected to fui-the r sureerl,.<br />

l+3


Fol-lowin.e the liouid diet, the barr.ows were given<br />

eccess to the grower ration (Table ?) untÍI placed on test.<br />

i.eadiness for test .1'¿ì s -:,ij::rci bl; nornal dietary i_ntake of<br />

the grower ¡'ation for 4 to 5 consecutive days by aII pigs.<br />

The barror¡s were switcired to their :'espective iest diets<br />

12 da.r's after the operation.<br />

Problens associated with cannulation o.f pigs:<br />

blockage o.f di.gesta was shor,.,'n by abnornal leakage around the<br />

ileal cannule, conconi tênt lrri th an acute drop in feed<br />

intake. The pigs were fecì J t|nes dailir ¿¡d usuailT con_<br />

suned alL tire feed that v;as supplieci rr¡iihin one hour after<br />

feedlng. lione or partial consu;nption usually inCicated<br />

blocicage. The interconnecting tube was renoved and v;arm t¡ater<br />

t¿¡as flushed into the ileun until nor¡:ar flow v¡as reestablisheci.<br />

?hereafter, pigs went on feed. again within a couple of hours.<br />

The frequency of b]-ockage was verj¡ dependent on the type of<br />

diet fed. Elockage of digesta was a serious problem when -r,he<br />

pigs rvere fed the rr.-l_4 diet(yie. ¿).<br />

Ëlockage lvas also caused by the rcurling uprr o.f the<br />

f,langes of the ileal- cannula and .wâs corz,ected. by removing tÌre<br />

cannula and replacing it wit,h one thai had a less flexible<br />

( -r,htci


and the flow of digesta was often cut off. This condition<br />

r"iê. s corrected by removing the cannula and repl acing it t/ith<br />

one that had a larger and thicker flange.<br />

Formation of a ttpocketrr (hypertrophy of the distaL<br />

end of the ileum ) oc curyed in one i-nstance , namely to pig<br />

number 5. This condition resulted ín accumulation of<br />

relatively dry digesta in the ,npockettr. peristalsis<br />

'squeezed out the lio.uid part o.f the digesta and. intestinal f10lv<br />

c arile to a ha1t. ihis condition could not be corrected and<br />

pig number J was replaced by nu¡ber Z (Fig. 2). FÌovrever,<br />

the first test period for pig nu¡¿ber 7 (diet1'ï_Z) diA not<br />

start until the other 5 pigs hrere on the last test period<br />

for the cereal grains (days34-40).<br />

Build-up of pressure due to blockage and rubbing of<br />

the cannulae against the steel bars of the cages by the pigs<br />

someti¡nes resulted in disconnection of the ilea1 ard caecal-<br />

cannulae and large amount s of digesta were lost. About<br />

2C0 m1 . of O.9{" sodiumchloride was infused into the caecum<br />

before reconnecting the cannulae.<br />

At times, the caecal cannulae were lost in the<br />

lumen of the large intestÍne and could not be retrieved.<br />

A spare caecal cannula was Ínserted. The lost cannula<br />

appeared in the faeces 48 to 72 hours l_ater.<br />

The pigs had to be prevenred frorn laying on tireir<br />

right side (where the cannulae were inserted) during.the<br />

b5


2d-ìrou:' collection. i,!j.ld ph]'sica1 restraint vras appt isd<br />

and the pigs becane grâdual1:¡ trained to lie on their left<br />

side during coLle ction.<br />

Feed preparation: barle¡.', corn and v",heat ln¡ere<br />

ground through a lt/I6, 3/L6 and l_ inch screen respectively.<br />

The ground naterj-al was nixed with vit,anins and ninerals<br />

end made into pellets of 0. J cin. diar,reter in a steern<br />

pe]-Iet niu (câlifo'nia pelì-et milr). îhe naintenance di.ers<br />

wer"e made into pellets of 0.25 cn. in a snall laborator;r<br />

pelLet mill- (Superior-Tenplewood clrl, pellet ¡rill ).<br />

!'eeciing reginen: equal anounls of feed. uere<br />

offered J tines dail¡z at 6:CO A.Ì.., 2:AO p.Ì1. and lO:OO p.Ì,1.<br />

The average daily intake of the grower ration (average of<br />

all pigs) was recorded and cieten¿ined the daili, allowable<br />

intake of lhe test d.iets for the period following. The<br />

ailowable intake was calculated io the nearest JO or<br />

100 grans (Fig. 2). l,iater v¡as supplied ad libitun at all<br />

ti¡ne s .<br />

Ixperirnental design: the experirnent was condu.cied<br />

as a si-nple ci.oss-over desi.gn in which il.,¡o 'barrov;s were .fed<br />

iÌ:s I cereaL diets at I different periods


FICURE 2. Experinentål deslgn ancì allowebl-e dietary intake for study 2a.<br />

DAYl<br />

PIG NO. 2<br />

5<br />

1<br />

6<br />

À<br />

(71<br />

ÀLtoirrÂBlE<br />

DIETARY INTÂKEJ<br />

t-7 8-1r 12_18<br />

Y-72 GR2 'l¡2 cR Ð2 cR<br />

II-7 GR W GR õ öii<br />

YI-? GR C GR r,,I cR<br />

rr-7 cR c GR !r cä<br />

M-7 CR B ON C GII<br />

'I!1.7 GR B GR C Cii<br />

1800<br />

Day l indicates the lzth day after the operation.<br />

l{alntenance ¡l1.et.74 alÞhåfloc (M-7); Grower (0R); írheat (1,rt); Corn (C}; ltaintenance<br />

dlet , LL,fr alphafioc (¡{-i4).<br />

Grans per dalr, as is.<br />

1950<br />

l9-2? 23-29<br />

30-)3 ïr.-t+o<br />

c2<br />

c<br />

B<br />

B<br />

l',l<br />

f¡<br />

45-6t 62-65 66-'72<br />

GR M-7 GR<br />

GR yL-i GR<br />

GR M-7 GR<br />

çR TÍ-7 GR<br />

GR M.7 GR<br />

GR ¡,1-7 on<br />

2100<br />

¡,r-142<br />

M-1ä<br />

M-i4<br />

M-1¡l<br />

ill-11+<br />

rÍ-1[<br />

2100<br />

+.<br />

\l


ciíet seouence. The grower ration was fed for 4 davs<br />

betrveen the cereal anð./ or r,raintenanc e diet tesi periods.<br />

Collection crocedures: faeces were collected. for<br />

24 hours lram 2:00 P.i'i. on da}' 5 ro Z:OO p.Ì.. on day 6<br />

during each tes't period. -A. 2d-hour contÍnuous ileal_<br />

collection lvas carried ou-i, from 2:00 p,l,l. on day 6,uo<br />

2: OO P.ir.î. on day J. A plastic bag was tied to the ileal<br />

cannulae during colLection and its conlents were ernptied<br />

into a beakæ until a tot,al of dOO r,rJ_. was collec-r,ed..<br />

Àfter slirr:.ng a lO;o ariouor was texen oy aio o.f a<br />

J0 cc s¡'¡isge with a catheter tip. The reriainder was<br />

nade up to 400 m1 . again with clistilled water, reheated<br />

to pig body tenpçrature and j.nfused within half an hour<br />

into the caecai cannula by aici of a 50 cc syz,inge. The<br />

aiiquots taken for analyses were put into a container placed<br />

in ice. These containers were changed every eight hours after<br />

the start of the ileal collection. Therefore, for each pig<br />

J pooled B-hour col_lections were obtained.<br />

Calculatlons: âpparent avaiLabi.lities of the<br />

nutrients were determined b¡r aid of calculations based on the<br />

l-evels of chromic oxide in feecÌ, ileal digesta and faeces<br />

(Crarnpton and äarris, 1969). Ileal nut¡,ient availabilities<br />

'¡ere aLso de"'erÌnined by totai collection. True availabilities<br />

were deterr¡rined by correciÍng the apparent nutrient avair-abi-ritie s<br />

48


for the levels of endogenous nutrients, which were obtained<br />

by feeding the maintenance diets.<br />

Studv 2b.<br />

Six non-cannul-ated Ì,îana g ra barrows were subjected.<br />

to essentially the sane experimental conditi.ons as the<br />

cannulated pigs in study 2a. They ranged in weight from<br />

36 fo 4I kg. at the start of the experiment. The same<br />

test diets were used as for study 2â (Table 7).<br />

<strong>fn</strong> thís st,udy, Þl-14 was also fed pr:ior to the<br />

cereal test diet sequence. Three pigs were fed Ì.I-Z and<br />

3 pigs were fed Ì,1- ld during each period that the r¿aintenance<br />

diets were fed. Pigs receiving i-i- / during thre first test<br />

diet period v¡ould receive Ì'i-14 the following test period<br />

and vice versa, prior to and after the cereal test diet<br />

sequence.<br />

Study 3.<br />

the fate of caecally infused isolated soy<br />

protein and LTS was studied with 6 growing Ì:ianagra barror^rs.<br />

Caeca1 fistulae were fitted to 5 barrows weighing<br />

approxirnately 20 to 23 kE. and to one baruow that weighed.<br />

14 kg. VJith the exception of the surgury including the<br />

fitting of ileal cannulae, the procedure for insertion<br />

of caecal fistulae was similar to that cited under Slud.y<br />

2a (Easter and Tanksley, I9T3).<br />

l+9


The caecal fÍst,ula v¡as icienticaL in size and<br />

shape to the caecaL cannula used in sirud:¡ 2e viith .ûhe ex_<br />

ception that the barrel was 2 cn. J_onger (Fig. l). The<br />

fis-r,ula '¡as closed with a plug and firr:l¡. taped to the<br />

sl


TABLE 8. Fornul-ation of test diets in study 3.<br />

DIETS B+zISPI B+TSPI B+TSP+ITSI<br />

Ingredíents (l)<br />

Barley SL.7? 8b.72 ïb.Tz<br />

fsolated soy proteíE 6.2¿ - 3.39 3.39<br />

Supplemental Lysine¿ 0.00 0.00 0.20<br />

Cornstarch 3;00 6.39 6.39<br />

Soybean oil 2.O0 2.OO 2.OO<br />

Calciun carbonate L.25 L.Z5 L.2j<br />

Dicalciun phosphate O.75 O.75 O.Zj<br />

Chrooicoride + + +<br />

saltj o.5o o.5o 0.50<br />

Vitanin-mineral4 1:óo i.óo i:óo<br />

antibiotic prenix<br />

t t*rttt (Barley-plus 2 times 3.39 units of isolated soy<br />

protein); B+ISP (Barley plus 3.39 units of isolated.<br />

soy protein); B+ISP+LÏS (Barley plus 3.39 units of<br />

isolated soy protein plus supplemental lysine).<br />

2 tysine monohyd.rochlori.de.<br />

3 As ín Table ?<br />

4 Supplied-(ke_diet): viramin A 2200 Iü; !-iranin D 330 tU;<br />

ritan:in 81, 11.0 u.g; zinc lZ3 mgi neóadox 22 g.<br />

Âl


Êoth experinents w-ore set up as l,g)il iati.n Scuare<br />

deslgns. The test diets were fecì for I cia;,,s. Iqua1 anounts<br />

of f eed were off erecÌ I tines daily at ó : OO A.Ì.T. , 2: OO p.i"-1.<br />

and i0:00 F.i... ?he dail¡' aüounts of feed off ered were<br />

1800, 1950 and 2040 grans (on an as is basis) cìuring<br />

periods f, fI and lff respectivell". Äpnroximate daiì-i, i.n-<br />

takes per unit of metabclic body weight (r¡ì.,.,C'7 5 ) wer+ .t ?2o<br />

' r\ë. / rler " -/,r\..<br />

1370 and 1390 gra¡ns for periocis I, lT and I.II respectively.<br />

Ì¡fater r'ra s offereC freel¡,. just prior to and. after each feed.in6;.<br />

The barrows were fed a pig grower ration for 4 days between<br />

test periods (fable 7). The grower ration was fed at the<br />

sane l-evel of intake as the test diets duri-ng the following<br />

test period.<br />

Starting on da1' l of each test period at 6:00 A.j,..<br />

to day I at 2:00 P.l.;., ISP or LïS was infused I tirnes daily<br />

j.nto the caecum of the pigs. The daiì_y e_rount s of nitrogen<br />

from ISP and LYS that were infuseci into the caecuÍl of the<br />

pJ-gs are shown in îable 9 and Table 10 respectì.vely. The<br />

infusions were perfornied durin¿ the ti.r:e the pigs were<br />

eating. The test diets rvere usually consu¡,red within lO<br />

ininutes aiter they were offered.<br />

Startíng on day 5 of each test perioC a 3_daT<br />

nitrogen balance study wâs initiated. three consecutive<br />

Z4-hour coLlections of urine and faeces were car:.ied our<br />

beginning at 2:00 P.lr,. each colLection da¡¡.<br />

)¿


TABLE 9. The experimental- design and the daily intake of dry matter and orally<br />

and caecally supplied nitrogen in study Ja.<br />

PERTOD<br />

Pie IVo. I<br />

Dry matter intake (e)<br />

Nitrogen intake (g):<br />

0ra1ly<br />

Caecalllr<br />

Total<br />

!¡s-Ng--?<br />

Dr1' ¡¡"¡""r intake (e )<br />

Ilitrogen intake (e)î<br />

0rally<br />

Caecally<br />

TotaI<br />

Pie tJo. _1<br />

Dry matter intake (g)<br />

Nitrogen intake (g):<br />

0ra1ly<br />

Caecally<br />

Total<br />

(s+zrsP )l<br />

L687.50<br />

tÃ.95<br />

o.o0<br />

t+L.95<br />

(B+rsP )<br />

L6ór+.10<br />

3rÞ. 88<br />

0.00<br />

34.88<br />

(B+TSP+C-ISP )<br />

l-66À.10<br />

3tÞ.88<br />

9.57<br />

I+4.1+5<br />

Abbreviations in parentheses indi cate<br />

represents the treatment in which fSP<br />

IT<br />

(¡+rsp)x<br />

L802.78<br />

37.79<br />

0.00<br />

37.79<br />

(B+ISP+C-rSP )<br />

L8O2.78<br />

37.79<br />

LO.37<br />

,+8.16<br />

(B+2rSP)<br />

1828.13<br />

I+5 .l+5<br />

0.00<br />

l+5 .l+5<br />

TTT<br />

(n+tsp+c-rsp )x<br />

1885.98<br />

39.53<br />

10. 85<br />

50.38<br />

(B+2rSP)<br />

L9L2.5O<br />

47.5t+<br />

0.00<br />

Ir7 .51+<br />

(B+rsP )<br />

1885.98<br />

39.53<br />

0.00<br />

39.53<br />

the dietary treatments. B+ISP+C- fSP<br />

is infused into the caecur.


TABIE 10. The experimental design<br />

nitrogen and orally añd<br />

PERTOD<br />

Pig No. lr<br />

Dry matter intake (e)<br />

Itlitrogen intake (e ) -<br />

Lysine intake (s):<br />

0raLLy<br />

Ca e caIIy<br />

Total<br />

Pis*{o.5<br />

Dry matter intake (e)<br />

Itlitrogen intake (e)-<br />

Lysine intake (s)ì<br />

0rall_y<br />

Caecal_ly<br />

Total<br />

Pie No.* 62<br />

Dry matter intake (q)<br />

llltrogen intake (g )-<br />

Lysine intake (e )ì<br />

0ra1Ly<br />

Ca e cally<br />

TotaL<br />

and the daily lntake of dry<br />

caecally supplied 1ysine iir<br />

(B+rsp+c-¿ys )1<br />

1664.10<br />

3r1.88<br />

9.32<br />

3.L7<br />

L2,t9<br />

(B+rsP )<br />

1664. ro<br />

34.88<br />

9.32<br />

0.00<br />

9.32<br />

(n+tsp+tys )<br />

L675.O8<br />

35.0t+<br />

11.89<br />

0. oo<br />

11.89<br />

(s+rsp+Lys )l<br />

1815.45<br />

37.96<br />

t2.89<br />

o.o0<br />

t2.89<br />

(B+ISP+C-LYS )<br />

r_802.78<br />

37.79<br />

10.10<br />

3. tr3<br />

L3.53<br />

(B+rsP )<br />

L8O2.?8<br />

37.79<br />

10.t0<br />

0. o0<br />

10.10<br />

Abbreviations in oarentheses indicate the dietary treatments. B+rsp+c-Lïs represents<br />

the treatment <strong>fn</strong> which LIS is i;¡;;;ã into the caecum.<br />

Data from plg number 6 on treatment B+fSp+C-LyS çs¡¿ not available. \I<br />

ÏI<br />

matter and<br />

study lb.<br />

ITI<br />

(s+rsp )1<br />

r885.98<br />

39.53<br />

Lo'se<br />

0. o0<br />

r0.56<br />

(B+TSP+IYS )<br />

L899.2r+<br />

39.7r<br />

13. l}8<br />

0.00<br />

13 .48<br />

(B+rsP+c-tys )


Ðata from pig nuraber 6 for peri.od fII are not<br />

available (Îab1e 10). This pig was about g kg. lighter<br />

than the other pigs when surgery was perfornred and the<br />

first test period for this pig was not started. until<br />

the other pigs were on test period lff. lnadvertently,<br />

insufficient B+ISP diet was prepared to carry this pig<br />

through period fII.<br />

The amount of nitrogen fro¡n fSp to be infused<br />

was to be the difference between the nitrogen intake of<br />

the pig receiving the B+2r-Sp diet and the. pig receivj.ng<br />

the B+ISP diet during each test period. For exarnple, pig<br />

number 3 should have received 7.07l- grans of nitrogen per<br />

da¡r by caecal infusion (Table 9). However, 9.57 insteaC<br />

of 7.O7 grams of nitrogen from ISp was infused daiì_y into<br />

the caecum. This value was arrived at as follows: the<br />

difference bet̡een the E+2JSP and the E+ISp diet was 3.39<br />

grams of fSP per 100 grams of diet (Table g). For lgOO<br />

grams, the daily intake (as is basis) during period l, the<br />

difference would be equivalent to 6L.OZ2 grams of fSp.<br />

Eecause of calculation errors, the percentage of dry matter<br />

of the test diets was not taken into accoun!. Ten percent<br />

L+t.gs - 34.g8 = 7.07. zte * 3.jg = 6:.oz.<br />

6(


a1l-o1.¡enc3 v/es red= to eccount for l_csses Curi.n¿ i::íusion.<br />

lsolateC so¡' protein contalned l.l+.25,'/" ni.tro¿-:n, Jons=cuentl¡.,,<br />

the totel eflount of nitrogsn frcn fSp infuseC Caill, was<br />

9.57 gransl. ff the percenrege of drr¡ natter (95,C{") f.a¿<br />

keen conside:.eC and the allouance l:.aC not been naCe, the<br />

an':ount of infused nitrogen v;ould l:ave been .3. Op .nre:.=2 p.r<br />

Ca¡;. ,l- s ',,¡a s trentioned previo'-lsb', the diets l^;e::e pelleted<br />

in a comercial ty'pe pellet nill. Contanination frcn oihe¡diets,<br />

pt'3sent in the rixing anC or celleting s¡rsten, cculd<br />

ha¡.¡e taken place anci accounted for sone oÍ tLe remei-nCer cf<br />

the diff erence r^¡Ì:ich rvas I. 02 g""*=l of nitrogen.<br />

The difference betlveen LyS that was infuseC and that<br />

shculd hal'e been infuseC na1, be explained in the sene nanner<br />

es for ISP infusion (Tab1e I and l0).<br />

crr,^.,. /<br />

v ! qsJ.<br />

T.<br />

Thís stuC'.. r.ra s subCiviCed into st rldl.r l+e anci 4b.<br />

Study l,a Cealt v¡ith the deterninati.on of ileal end feecel ântno<br />

¿cid ar¡ailabilitiês fron v;heat and wheat Ce¡,ir¡ed fi.actions, in<br />

accltion to the ceterninaticn of netaboric iteal anc faecal<br />

anino acid levels . StuC:.' db v,ras carried ou.t t o iet:rnine the<br />

cifferences in ileal anc faecal a::inc acic avail;bilities f¡'o::<br />

!¿.t ¡c _ l1C _ LL.Zê Zz, nn __ % _. LL,el<br />

-....^lOc^1c0.-I.""-.1¡õ'.-f.¡-.<br />

]e (-.\-'; ,".' ,ì<br />

- l.\_t<br />

1 .\^<br />

^" - !.v2.<br />


finely ground and cracked whole wheat<br />

St ud¡., l,a .<br />

i,,hole wheat was ¡ni1led to give JJ/, firo,tr,<br />

II .251" shorts end 2.5% niddlings. The bran, shorts<br />

v¡ere reco¡nbined in the sane proportion as theSr l¡s¡s<br />

nilling to give the E+S+l: diet.<br />

The i1eal and faecal amino acid, a,¿ailabili-ties .fron<br />

whole wheat, fiour and the E+S_., li diet were deternined with 6<br />

ì.anagra barrows that were fitted r,;ith ileocaecal re_entrant<br />

cannulae (Table 11 ). Three protein_free diets containing !, lO<br />

and L5f alphafloc respecti-ver-y were enplo,rzed to deternine the<br />

levels of metebolic ileal_ and faecal anino acids (Table Il).<br />

' Re-entrânt cannulae v"¡ere fitted to barolvs v;eighing<br />

37 to t*5 y". the pigs weighed from gl_ to.91 kg. at the end o.f<br />

the experir:ent.<br />

TLa j rrr, ¡(¿r.grcal -"-^.r procedure, type and. size o.f cannulee used,<br />

pre and post-operative care, housing, collection proce,lure and<br />

the duration and times the test ciets viere fed were si¡nila:. to<br />

those described under study 2a with one exception. Tleal digesta<br />

was collected continuously for only 16 hours, starting at 6:oo i..ì_.<br />

7 dal's after the pigs r¡e?e switched to their respective test<br />

diets. Faeces were collected for 24 hours prior to the start<br />

of the ileal_ col1e ction.<br />

AII diets v¡ere n:ade into pellets of 0.25 cn. dianeter.<br />

Iiho1e wheat lvas ground through a 2.CA rulr screen prior to<br />

)t<br />

]L.2511 bren,<br />

and niddlincs<br />

obtained bi.z


L<br />

2<br />

)<br />

TABIE 11. Formulatlon of diets for study l¡.<br />

DIETS<br />

LEVEI, OF ATPHAFI,OC (ø)<br />

Ingredients (%):<br />

tr{hole wheat<br />

Fl-our_<br />

B+S+Mt<br />

Cornstarch<br />

Alphafloc<br />

Sucros e<br />

Soybçan oil<br />

Salt¿<br />

Calclum carbonate<br />

DieaLciun phosphate<br />

Vitarnin-Êntf bi¿rrÍc<br />

PremixJ<br />

Chromic oxide<br />

Consists of Liy'o bran,<br />

As for Table 7<br />

As for TabLe ? .<br />

l¡fHOLE<br />

ÍìTHEAT<br />

97.OO<br />

o.5o<br />

L.25<br />

0,75<br />

o.50<br />

+<br />

96.00<br />

o.5o<br />

2.00<br />

1. O0<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

95.00<br />

o.50<br />

4.00<br />

0.00<br />

o.5o<br />

45Ø shorts and LV/" middlings.<br />

+<br />

63.00<br />

5. O0<br />

27.50<br />

1.00<br />

o.5o<br />

o'50<br />

2.00<br />

o'50<br />

+<br />

PROTEIN.FREE<br />

10<br />

63. O0<br />

10. o0<br />

22.5O<br />

r.00<br />

0.50<br />

o.5o<br />

2.00<br />

0.50<br />

+<br />

63.00<br />

1-5. OO<br />

L7.50<br />

t_.00<br />

o'50<br />

0.50<br />

2.00<br />

o.5o<br />

+<br />

ôo


pelleting. The E+S+l: diet v;as not ground prior to pelJ.eting.<br />

The experiri:ent wês set ì._tp in such e manner thet the<br />

effect of lever- of fiber on netabolic ileal and faecar anÍno<br />

acid le'¡els and the differences in avaiÌabilities cf amino<br />

acids f:.orn whole v¡heat, flour and the E+S+;:l diet could be<br />

anal¡rzed statisrical:-y by Z separate single cross_over designs.<br />

The periods during which the protein-free diets were fec were<br />

alternated with periods during v.'hich the wheet or u¡heat deriveci<br />

die'r"s were fed (Fie. 3 ).<br />

T\n¡o cannulated pigs (pig no, 6 and 9) were kept on<br />

standbSr and served as replacenent test animals in case coroplications<br />

arose r¡rith the pigs that r^¡ere actuall"rr te sted (Fig. 3 ¡ .<br />

Pigs nunber I, 2, tþ and Z did not consume i'ihe l5fr alphafloc<br />

protein-free diet nor the E+s+ir diets. pigs nu'ber 1 and 2 arso<br />

refused the 10,4 alphafloc protein-free diet. Replacenent pig<br />

number 6 consu¡ned both the 15f elphafl.c protein-free dict and<br />

the E+S+li diet. Replacernent pig number 9 did not consur:e the<br />

E+S+:i nor Lhe I5f" alphafloc protein_free diet (Fig. :).<br />

OnIy three observations (including Cata from pig<br />

nunber 6 ) were obtained fron diet E+S+?,i. The original E+S_!, I.t<br />

diet was diluted r"ith cornstarch so thêt cornstarch r::iade up 6a/"<br />

of ihe diluted E+s+i'{ diet. The cituted E+s+i,r diet (E+s+t.:_Ð) },as<br />

fed to the test aninals frorn da¡,, 6? to 7j (Fle. ¡ ).<br />

59


¡&lrn¡ ,. Eicpe¡tn.nt¡l d€lsn e¡it ¡llôl{abt€ itåtly rtt.tãr, tnrat. .fo¡ lt¡dy ¡,<br />

PIG ntlüBEN<br />

w-sz cR<br />

--r-- 2 PF-5 GR<br />

, tf-lo cn<br />

4 PF-IO GR<br />

5 PF-15 cR<br />

7 (r-$) oR<br />

6qnoh<br />

9Gncn<br />

ÂI¿OI.¡¡EI.E DI?TARI I'OO<br />

rNÎÂrE fsldâyl<br />

8-rr 12-ú<br />

FL G¡<br />

rL On<br />

E+S+¡! CB<br />

(B+s+¡tl oR<br />

Irf cR<br />

$¡f cn<br />

PF-15 CE<br />

PF-IO CR<br />

t500<br />

t9-22 2t-J9 to-tt<br />

(¡r-l¡t3 on<br />

{PF-151 Cn<br />

PF-5 Cn , Pr-5 Cn<br />

!F-LO<br />

!r-10<br />

0¡<br />

cB<br />

utl<br />

fl<br />

rL<br />

Ft<br />

B+S+¡t<br />

(B{€+u}<br />

B+S+¡t<br />

(B+s+r,t, Ct<br />

cR<br />

PF-lt<br />

pF-ró<br />

18oO tdoo<br />

: Pay 1 r€ th. el€verrh day &frer thê opèr¡¿roD.<br />

' i!i'åi3;liiï ih;lBi:?;Jrî¿ìj,";i:il"if;ï,*hqi."*:ål?fi,f î;l:l'"1ä"$:t;:"*,<br />

. frt3':'9i::l"i'f:19.äl¿,1ä'i-ÌtF),'+Íäf r*;lúSglåtÈi tiÈ:Sii."'¿r' ãåü"i.-i"i"iåiõ'r'r-¡r;<br />

3 ¡tet¡ tn pareDrh€36s lniHcâi. Dtsstng ob!..yario¡!.<br />

4 ltl6råbt. rt.l¡t iltêrary rntetr€ (g), !! r! bâËr!.<br />

3þ[o ' r]t-¡!<br />

cn<br />

OR<br />

GN<br />

G¡<br />

OR<br />

cn<br />

CR<br />

G¡<br />

5?-55 56-62 6r-66 67-73<br />

tFI:Ì3Ì 3l tBrgttrl<br />

PF_l' (pF-rr) c8 }'<br />

c& Ír<br />

PF-5 CB<br />

w-, c¡ 'L FL<br />

r9$-,rr 3i þ#:i3,<br />

2IO0 2tOO<br />

c¡<br />

c¡<br />

OR<br />

ct<br />

CR<br />

GN<br />

0n<br />

GA<br />

A+S+¡l-D<br />

E+A+¡{-¡)<br />

E+g+I'l-D<br />

E+S+¡t-D<br />

E+S+¡t-D<br />

E+S+¡t-D<br />

o¡<br />

6n<br />

2too<br />

71-7? 7ô-81<br />

GB ¡T-G<br />

GR ltfi-ci<br />

q¡ ll¡-c<br />

ct ttf-oi<br />

cn Íf-c<br />

OR TI-O<br />

GR lla-cn<br />

cn w-cn<br />

2À00<br />

o\


Studv Lb.<br />

Fine15' ground wheat was prepared by grinding the<br />

whole wheat three times through a hanner mill wiih a 1.5 nm<br />

screen. The cracked wheat was prepared b¡r grinding whcle<br />

wheat two times through a 6 mm screen. Eoth diets were<br />

made into pellets of 0.5 cn dia¡neter.<br />

Four pigs were assigned at randcm to each<br />

2 whole wheat diets (nig. 3¡. ?he whole wheat used<br />

stud_rr was of the sa¡ne source as that used in studv<br />

Analytical procedures<br />

t^<br />

of<br />

i-<br />

the<br />

thi s<br />

The test dÍets and faeces were dried in a forced_<br />

draft oven at 60-7a"c. rleal digesta viere freeze-driec. prior<br />

to analr,'ses, the sanples rdere ground throu.gh a I r:n nesh screen<br />

in a Il'iley nill .<br />

Anal1'sg5 for ash, crude fiber¡ drir 6¿1¡"r, ether<br />

extract and nitrogen Ìlrere car.rieC cut according to A.0,.Á..C.<br />

(197L) methods. Acid and neut ral-cetergent fíber rr,ere d.eter-<br />

nined according to the nethod outlined in Agriculture lÌandbook<br />

no. 379 (1970).<br />

Total starch was detennined accord.ing to the nethod<br />

of R. A. Ì'lacGregor (19?6, unpublished). ThÍs nethod involves<br />

dispersion of the ground sample, autoclaving, follovred bj¡<br />

digestion with glucoaml¡Iase. îhe totâl glucose reLeased l.ra s<br />

neasured using a Glucostat reeqent kit (glucose oxidase rnethod)<br />

61


on a autoan a:-:Ìzer.<br />

The level-s of chroaic oxide in feed, digesta and<br />

faeces were deternined according to the atonic âbsorption<br />

spectrophotonetry nethod of l.ii11ia¡ns et al . (1962).<br />

Arnino acid analyses were caruied out according to<br />

the method of Eragg et aI . (1966) with nodifications as<br />

cescribec by Giovannetti et al. (r9/o). r'rethionine, cïS and<br />

ÐAPA (o(-e- diaminopinelic acid) v,,ere determined accordíng to<br />

the rnethod of Hirs (1967). Tryptophen analJ¡ses were carried<br />

out eccording to the method of Hugli and lïoore (1972). The<br />

sar:rple s were analyzed on a nodel Il6-Eecknan amino aciC<br />

âna1-r'29¡.<br />

o¿


?-:SÌ-ILTS<br />

Stud" t_<br />

Ì.ith the e>:ce¡ticn oi CLU ¿nC ?.ç,C f¡.or.r lov¡ crotein<br />

l^rheat. br':n frcn high anC icv; prcte in r.;he¿t ccntaine,C hlshe¡.<br />

l:r-cl c l':l ^f .r't ^¡iro aclCs than ?nCcs¡+-- f¡¡n t-,j r_1. ¡¡d<br />

L_-=lr ::I:,.it Ðrr- u:: 1.-:j:.:. ¿::l-l<br />

lor.r¡ prctein r^rhe at (T:bl-e 12 ) , The hirh_.r 1e-..els (í.) of<br />

a:i::c eciCs ir: 'lra:: the:: in enccs:::r: '¡;e :: :z:.ti culirl,,<br />

;ïiì1nt for .¡.-.-C, ]-YS ;:rd ll-lì (esse rtiel aninc :cids ) ani fc-r<br />

¡.:.1 . iSP .nrt îif (non-essentief a::ino aciCs ). îhese d:ta<br />

-r^:=r'a al-sc r:fl:ct-ed bv th+ hi;h=r ccncentj,etion (as qt"aas peÌ,<br />

15 g::ns of nitrogen) of these a.nino acids 1n bran than in<br />

endosperr. prot;in. lhe concenti.:tions (g/tí¿ Il) ci al-I<br />

other anino aciis in prctein íro¡:i bran r^¡ere iol^;er thån ti:cse<br />

in prci:in cí er:Ccspern f:c:. bc,i. hÍ-;Ì^. :ri lc,,v :rccein rdh3:t .<br />

The ciiÍierences in aninc eci-rÌ concenireiian (gii5g l: ) r,¡ere<br />

i:c:'e r,:arirei Íor bran and enCcsperr derived íi-cn Io,¡; Frotein<br />

r¡rhee*" than for br.an and endcspern ,ler.ir.-eC frcn high prcteln<br />

';jith ti:e e:


TÂBl,ß 12. fhe ânlno acld ãnd nltrogen conteît of high and low p¡oteln<br />

wheat and their frections.<br />

CEREÂL COMPONENT<br />

IIMINO.ÀCIIN<br />

4ES<br />

TùIIO¿E WHEAÎ<br />

s/røgtz /"<br />

ITCH PROÎETN }r¡HEÁT<br />

e/L6eN<br />

o.?t+ r'.95 1.14 ¡*,9ó 22.7 0.65 3.dl<br />

Il4<br />

!-r!<br />

¡4S rysr<br />

ïiË<br />

lmr"<br />

vÂL<br />

9.i2 o.i6<br />

L.e-? o.Ej i:Bi l?.i o.ti l'.tt<br />

L.24 q.99 2.9e- 9.6e ã.gi r6:i ó:iir i:í6<br />

o.le 2.ll ).li 6.í,tr ið:i L.23 i.àt<br />

o.32 1.77 S.5l z.ji<br />

9.1t l:19 âl:ã<br />

li.j o.t:6<br />

o'.á9 i.lî<br />

l'.iõ<br />

Ë:Êi 0.7r 2:ii i:ii ,:Ut Is:t s:ti z:i8<br />

3.t9 o.s[ [:ói 19:t o,ir L'.i6<br />

t9¡<br />

9I,I<br />

9_rg<br />

q.%<br />

6.tg t.9i t.iL i:7ä ã1.í ó:¿¿ i'.:sã<br />

o.77 3j.99 t,.?2 z.Q+ to.ói ie.í ¿,:ró ¡ðlíõ<br />

i.l-i -1.?i ãl:i o.it -<br />

!_ER<br />

<strong>fn</strong>o 2.Li tt.z.i L.a¿<br />

o.É5 a.t-t e:ti i6:ó z.lz :rà.ià<br />

,,.69 f.0¡ l:íá ið:i õ:s4 -î,.öã<br />

rYn o.t6 j.zo õ.6e ã:ttr f?:i o.si ):iã<br />

Non-Essentiel<br />

--ftr--_ o.6i t,5t+ o.97 t+.Lr+ zz.r+ o.óo 3.i2<br />

NtrRocEN .2.92 16,00 t,7i 16.0 19.0 z.?3 16.0<br />

_^ 't_<br />

Expressed ås percentâge of dry nletter. 2 Erçressed aê g¡arns per slxteen graû¡s<br />

:f li:rogen; ) Thê percenta8e of enlno acids f¡on whols wheat presènt Ln the b¡an<br />

l¡âct1on. * Deterninêd by acid hyd¡olysis.<br />

clLíe$ fi<br />

¿O¡'' PROÎEIN WI'EAT<br />

s/16eN /"<br />

9'!q l.U- o.?2 s.Ls :'r.L<br />

9.?? L.97 0.26 t.Bj 2l.z<br />

9.2! J.2? 0.40 z.8L 22.o<br />

i:ii i,s,â lgiï; iii Li:Z<br />

i:ji a.L1 i:i\ r+.zo o.i9 E:?ri 3.?I ,+.zo li.i<br />

zL.i<br />

i:F,s :i:m å;li ,l:'it iij<br />

L.27 LL.35 1.02 7.2t t¡.ò<br />

3:3t L:EZ 3:9å L:',t 21,Z<br />

L.79 16.00 2.25 16,0 2t+.5<br />

o.4r<br />

0.21 1.95<br />

o.37 3.t<br />

'.d1<br />

L<br />

0.80 7.r+ì+<br />

o,25 2.33<br />

0.21 L.95<br />

o.55 5.!2<br />

o.3z 2.9è<br />

0,[8 4.r+?<br />

O,r+I 3. dl<br />

0.56 5.2t<br />

3,78 35,L6<br />

o.tr7 4.3?<br />

L.32 r2.2ê<br />

o,52 [,8¡]<br />

o,32 2.98<br />

l.?2 16,0<br />

c¡.


TÂB¡E 13. The anino åcld and nltrogen co¡tent of htgh and lor¡ proteln bsrlêy<br />

ênd lrhelr f¡actl.ons,<br />

CEREÄL COMPO¡ÎENÎ WHOLE BÂRLEY<br />

fir e/:r6e'lr2 f"<br />

ÁI.,II¡]O ACIDS<br />

Essential<br />

IIIG¡I PROTETN BÀR¡SÍ<br />

BRAN<br />

s/t6g:ñ /)<br />

ENDOSPTRM<br />

fi elßen<br />

ARG<br />

HIS<br />

II,E<br />

IEI'<br />

tYs _<br />

MET¡}<br />

PHE<br />

TfIR<br />

VAL<br />

o.51<br />

0,20<br />

o.)9<br />

o,38<br />

o.t5<br />

o.20<br />

0.58<br />

0.40<br />

0.r8<br />

L.'<br />

L,7<br />

t,t+<br />

?.3<br />

3.t<br />

L,?<br />

5.r<br />

3.5<br />

5.7,<br />

0.67 5.L 26.9 O.t+s<br />

0.2ê 2.t 28,7 0.20 ".2 i.9<br />

o.,+5 3.,+ 23.7 O.39 3,7<br />

O.8r 6.2 2O,O O.8r[ ?.9<br />

o.5? 4.4 33.+ O.3z 3.O<br />

0.r3 1.0 L3,3 0.22 2.t<br />

o.54 4.1 r9.1 0,60 5.6<br />

0.44 t.L 22.6 0.37 J.5<br />

0.68 5.2 2'+.O 0,58 5.5<br />

Non-Essentlâ1<br />

--îfii-<br />

^sP 0LU<br />

GLY<br />

PRo<br />

sER<br />

TYR<br />

o. j2<br />

o.7z<br />

2.90<br />

0,50<br />

L,27<br />

O,53<br />

O.37<br />

t+.j<br />

6.3<br />

25.4<br />

t+.4<br />

11.1<br />

4.6<br />

3.2<br />

0.6¡, 4.9<br />

o.92 7.O<br />

2.34 A7,9<br />

0,62<br />

0.8,<br />

4.7<br />

6.5<br />

0.48 3.7<br />

o.27 2,L<br />

25.2<br />

26.2<br />

],6.5<br />

25.b<br />

L3,7<br />

18.6<br />

15.0<br />

0.r,6 t,.3<br />

0.66 6,2<br />

3.W 29.L<br />

0,46 t+.3<br />

L.33 L2.5<br />

0.5r À.8<br />

0.t8 3.6<br />

NITRoCETV 1,6? 16.0 2,@ 16.0 23.t' L?O 16.0<br />

I Expressed âs pelcentage of dry natter. 2 Expressed as grams pe¡ sixtoe¡ grå¡ns of<br />

nltrogen. 3 The porcentage of amlno acldÉ f¡on whole ba¡Ley presênt ln the bren<br />

fractLon, 4 Deternlned by acld hydrolyels.<br />

WHOI,E BARI,ET<br />

f" slL6èN<br />

0.36<br />

0,14<br />

4.2<br />

1.6<br />

o,?8<br />

0.62<br />

3.3<br />

2.3<br />

o.29<br />

0.15<br />

3,t+<br />

1,d<br />

0,À0 t+.?<br />

0.30<br />

0,r+1<br />

3,5<br />

4.9<br />

0,5t+<br />

0.22<br />

0.3ó<br />

o-6q<br />

o.5i<br />

O.ôs<br />

o.39<br />

0.i7<br />

0,5i<br />

o.42<br />

0,60<br />

L.9<br />

7.I<br />

L,87 22.O<br />

o.55<br />

o.81<br />

1.6¿<br />

o.82<br />

o.37<br />

o.2?<br />

9.6<br />

,+,4<br />

3.2<br />

o,i9<br />

O.39<br />

0,18<br />

L.36 16.0 1.66<br />

LOI{ PNOTEIN BÂRLEY<br />

BRÀN<br />

% s/r6ev 5)<br />

DNÐOSPER¡I<br />

,Å elr'cls<br />

5.2<br />

2,L<br />

2,5 6.3<br />

4.9<br />

o.9<br />

3,q<br />

3.6<br />

L,9<br />

3j.9 0.37<br />

35.5 o.rÀ ".6 í-z<br />

29.L 0,3ó 3.i<br />

23.7 0.6À -e<br />

39.? 0.2d ' i.4<br />

L3.6<br />

22,O<br />

0,L? 2.i<br />

0,l¡o 5.o<br />

27.9 0.28 r- s<br />

28.r o.¿r i.i<br />

29.6<br />

29.4<br />

I9,8<br />

29. t+<br />

ló.3<br />

23.8<br />

15. r<br />

0,37 t,.6<br />

0.55 ó.8<br />

L.92 23.8<br />

o.37 t+,6<br />

0,90 ta-2<br />

o35 r,,j<br />

0.26 3.4<br />

27.6 L,29 16. O<br />

5.3<br />

7,8<br />

15,8<br />

5.0<br />

5.?<br />

3.8<br />

L.7<br />

16. O<br />

o\


ALA, ASP and Gl,T were higher j.n bran than ín endosperm<br />

when these were expressed as grans per 16 grans of nj-trogen.<br />

The concentration (g/t6g tl) of the other anino acids,<br />

especially lEU, I'IET, PHE, GLU, PRO and TyR were lower in<br />

bran than in endosperm protein. Ðifferences in amino<br />

acid concentration (g/t6g Itr) v¡ere nore marked for bran<br />

and endosperra protein frorn low than fro¡n high protein<br />

barley.<br />

The rats did not consume the bran di.ets fronr<br />

barley in its complete form. The crumbles were broken up<br />

and sorted. <strong>fn</strong> addition, faeces frorn barley bran were of<br />

a very moist nature and became contarninated. vrith sorted.<br />

and spilled food. Due to these difficulties and the biased<br />

data that would be obtained, feeding bran from barlelT to<br />

the rats was discontinued. Therefbre, no amino acid<br />

availability estimates from barley bran are available.<br />

The average daily dry matter intake of the test<br />

diets b]. the rats are shown in Table l_4. . The wheat bran<br />

diet v¡as consumed to a slightly lesser extent than the<br />

whole wheat or endosperm diet.<br />

Apparent amino acid availabilities, nitrogen and<br />

dry matter digestibilities are given in Table 15. I,Ìean<br />

squares of the anal_yses of varíance are given in the appendix,<br />

Table L. lfith the exception of HIS,IEU, ALA, and G.LU, there<br />

Ìvere no significant differences in apparent avairabilities of<br />

66


TÀBL¡ t4. Ì:eans ênd ståndård devi¿tion of dâtly rirrr ¡-1to. ínteì


amino acids due to weight. For the amino acids mentioned<br />

apparent availabilities were only I Lo Zi| hi.gher for the<br />

heavier than for the lighter rats. Only one weight x test<br />

diet interactíon was found, namely for HIS. The ciry uatter<br />

digestibilitl¡ hras significanrly higher (by 0.9,í) for the<br />

lieavier than for the lighter rats.<br />

Nitrogen and dry matter digestibilities were<br />

significantly higher from wheat endosperm than from wheat<br />

bran (fable 15). Those of whole wheat were between those<br />

of endosperm and bran. Apparent amino acid availabilities<br />

fror: whole wheat and its derived fractions foLlowed the<br />

same pattern. However, the dífferences in percentage units<br />

even if significant were of a sma1l n:agnitude. L,vsine was<br />

always the least available aroino acid and ranged frorn Zg.9<br />

to 82.2i[ for the high protein wheat and. its fractions and<br />

from 71 .4 to 73.L for the 1ow protein wheat and its fractions.<br />

Threonine was always the second. least avaj.lable essential_<br />

amino acid. fsoleucine and 1..ßT were also of 1ow availability<br />

(ì-ess than 80?á ) for bran from the lovr proiein r,rrheal . For<br />

the non-essential amino acicìs, ALA and ASp were always ¿þs<br />

leãst available.<br />

Ðr¡r matter,digestibili.ty, apparent nitrogen<br />

digestibility and anrino acid availabilities were higher for<br />

endosperm of barley than of whole barley (Table 16). The<br />

apparent availabilitíes of lysine were very 1ow: they were<br />


TABLE l-5.\ Meansl and standard error of the ¡nean of the apparent availabil-ities of<br />

anino acids f¡om wheat and its fractions.<br />

CEREAL<br />

COMPONENT<br />

AMINo ÂcrDs (ø)<br />

Essential- '<br />

_-Aa-G--<br />

HIS<br />

TT,E<br />

LEU<br />

LYS<br />

¡{ET3<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

ASP<br />

GI,U<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

wrrnocrrq (%)<br />

DRT MATTER(%)<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1ríH0LE<br />

TIIHEAT<br />

TIÏGH PROTETN hIHEAT<br />

BRAN<br />

91.28 92.4I'' gz.gl<br />

%.?+ 93.rAB gL.6A<br />

90.4+ 87.ocn gz.8l<br />

ez.?! se. s! sL.3A<br />

?8.98 ?6.98 Bà.2A<br />

91.04 86.58 9z.LA<br />

9,r..01 gr.79D g,.uA<br />

d6.dB û.5c à:9.i^<br />

90.4À 8z .ecD gz.?A<br />

85.2s 82.¡c B8.OA<br />

85 ôA 82.5ø' 8? .?A<br />

3å:3Ë 32..#<br />

9? JlB s5 . jD eB. oA<br />

92 .68 89 . rc gL. rrL<br />

"g'.t*<br />

ENDO-<br />

SPERM<br />

91.d4 8d.48 Ð.3A<br />

89.?R<br />

903c<br />

Means in the same row with the<br />

Standard error of the mean.<br />

Determined by acid hydrolysls.<br />

ú.zc gz.zÃ<br />

n¡F 9ò.rÂ<br />

bIHOI.E<br />

IVHEÀT<br />

87.8c<br />

90.8c<br />

85.308<br />

S9.lt:<br />

73 ,l+v<br />

87.98<br />

90.80<br />

81.9cD<br />

86.3D<br />

80.9c<br />

?9,tc<br />

95.?2<br />

8r+. 8\,,<br />

95.gcD<br />

89.Lc<br />

85.6c<br />

LOI^I PROTETN hIHEAT<br />

BRAN<br />

ENDO.<br />

SPERM<br />

87.8c 88.?c<br />

87.9D gL.gBc<br />

??.7F 88.rC<br />

83.0D er.d<br />

?1.4c0 zz.zc<br />

77.o8 8?.98<br />

84.gG gz.ic<br />

7t+.98 ú.?c<br />

80.78 8d.6c<br />

75.8D 8r.eC<br />

74.rDE 8o.5ec<br />

el.ol s6.52<br />

7?.LL 86.8u<br />

89.oG 96.88c<br />

¿2.& go.7c<br />

?6.LE 87.[B<br />

sà.,f 75.68 87. j8<br />

88.8D 69.0c 9[.oA<br />

-x 4_2<br />

o.49<br />

o.¿g<br />

o,62<br />

o.57<br />

1.02<br />

0.75<br />

0.40<br />

o.73<br />

0.53<br />

0.68<br />

0.83<br />

o.26<br />

o.55<br />

o.2g<br />

o.l*9<br />

o.59<br />

a.66<br />

o.2g<br />

same superscript do not differ slgnificantly (p(05)<br />

cr\<br />

\o


TABIE 1ó. Meansl and. standard error of the nean of the apparent avail-abilitfes of<br />

amino acids from whole barley and endosper¡n frórn barJ.ey.<br />

DTET<br />

CENEAL COMPONENT<br />

AMINO ACIDS (%)<br />

Essentiai<br />

.A.RG<br />

HIS<br />

ÏLE<br />

tEU<br />

LYS<br />

i'[ET3<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

ÄsP<br />

GLiJ<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NTTBOCE}I (/,)<br />

DRT MATTER (1Á)<br />

HTGH PROTEIN BANT,ET<br />

I{HOI,E<br />

BARI,EY<br />

82.38<br />

83.68<br />

?9.Û<br />

82.5D<br />

6?.7D<br />

dl.OcD<br />

86. oF<br />

?6.&<br />

s2. OE<br />

n.2E<br />

72.}Dr,<br />

89.88<br />

?6.ú<br />

90.5F<br />

82.88<br />

82.80<br />

Z9:4?'<br />

1 Means in the same roür vrith the same<br />

2 Standard error of the rnean.<br />

3 Determined by acid hydrolysis.<br />

ENDO-<br />

SPERM<br />

81. zE<br />

88. ÀD<br />

Ð.58<br />

8? 3c<br />

70.8cD<br />

82.8c<br />

89.38<br />

79.6D<br />

86.5D<br />

77 3Ð<br />

?5,6Ð<br />

%.5c<br />

år.41<br />

gtr'?'E<br />

8ó. oD<br />

84.5cD<br />

83.Iq<br />

93.24<br />

LOIIT PROTETN BARI,EY<br />

I/[IH0LE<br />

BARLEÏ<br />

?4.?9<br />

28. o!'<br />

?0.6G<br />

77 åE<br />

60.IE<br />

?L.58<br />

?8.6r<br />

Ø.$<br />

T.?î<br />

67. OF<br />

67.2F<br />

d,Ì. LG<br />

?o. o0<br />

83.6H<br />

7Iþ.2G<br />

?L.?F<br />

&3:Êi<br />

ENDO-<br />

SPERM<br />

81.d<br />

Ð.58<br />

79.6F<br />

ú.t+D<br />

68.2Ð<br />

?9']D<br />

ú.5H<br />

T.?E<br />

80.58<br />

7L,].E<br />

?L.58<br />

87.6F<br />

?h.gF<br />

89.0G<br />

- go.zF<br />

7e.ú<br />

76.tF<br />

9L.38<br />

si2<br />

o.b9<br />

0.48<br />

o.62<br />

o.57<br />

L.O2<br />

o.75<br />

0.t+0<br />

o.?3<br />

o,53<br />

0.68<br />

0.83<br />

o.26<br />

o.55<br />

o.29<br />

0.49<br />

0.59<br />

0.66<br />

o.2g<br />

superscript do not differ si.gnlficantfy (p


67.7 and' 6c.L',a ror the high and row protein barrey respecti-verl,<br />

Lysine avaílabiIi-i, ie s fron endospern viere slightf], hisher.<br />

Threonine was a1r,,ia,r' s t,he seconci l_easi availai:le essea-r,i¿l_<br />

ar;iino aci d. For the non-essential_ a¡iino acids, ÀSp, A.j.A<br />

and GLY were of low apparent availability.<br />

Appa:'ent amino acid availabilities of high and.<br />

lovi protein w-heat and barley are conpereci separateli, i¡1<br />

iable L7. Appareni availabilities of whole wheat are<br />

significantl]' higher than those of nhole barley. The<br />

avairabi-lities of a¡rino acids fron high protein wheåt were<br />

higher than those from low protein lvheat. The same<br />

relationship was found for high and low protein barley.<br />

The metabolic faecal anino acid excret,ion in_<br />

creased as the level of fÍber of the protein_free diets<br />

was increased from IO ú 2Ai¿ (fa¡te tg). Significant<br />

differences in amino acÍd excretions due to weight, in<br />

addition to a significant v;eight x test diet interaction<br />

for nitrogen were found (?ab]e 1ð; ippenciix, îable 2). For<br />

both protein-free dieis, the excretion o.f AF.G r"n'as si-gnificantl¡r<br />

higher for the heavier than for the liEhter rats. The<br />

exc¡etions of L-ri, ì.IT and i/AL v¡ere significantlj. hiËher<br />

for the lighter than for t,he heavier rats when these were<br />

fed the 1CÍ alphafloc protein-free ciiet. Leucine, i,ET, VAL,<br />

ALA and ASP excretions vJere significantly hlgher for the<br />

7L


TABLE 17. Means1 and standard error of the mean of apparent anlno acld avallabilities<br />

of high and low protein wheat and barl_ey. '<br />

CEREAL ORATN<br />

I,EVEL OF<br />

PNOTETN (ø)<br />

AMINo ACÏDS (/,)<br />

Ess entiaL<br />

--T1ã-<br />

HTS<br />

II,E<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS<br />

I{ET3<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

vAt<br />

Non-Essential<br />

-r,ã---<br />

ASP<br />

GI,1'<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NrTnocEN (ø)<br />

DRY },ÍATTER (ø)<br />

L<br />

2<br />

3<br />

r8.3<br />

gL.2B<br />

93,?A<br />

eo.4+<br />

92.7^<br />

?8.s8<br />

91. OA<br />

94.0}{<br />

86.88<br />

90. ¿A<br />

85.2P<br />

95.34<br />

9?.t+A<br />

89.88<br />

si.t!B<br />

92.6ts<br />

91.84<br />

89.?B<br />

go.3c<br />

II'THEAT<br />

LL.2<br />

s?.82<br />

90.8t,<br />

85.308<br />

89. r&B<br />

ß.4c<br />

33.38<br />

dl.9cD<br />

86.3D<br />

so. el<br />

79.L"<br />

o< .rB<br />

åt.93'<br />

á6'.ic<br />

85.6c<br />

84.4c<br />

88.80<br />

11.rr<br />

82.3P<br />

83.68<br />

79.OT<br />

82.5D<br />

6?.?D<br />

gt.ocD<br />

86. oF<br />

76.Ñ<br />

82.08<br />

t2'38,<br />

89.88<br />

76.oy<br />

90.51'<br />

82.8!;<br />

82.8D<br />

?8.7D<br />

$.?E<br />

Means in the same row with the same superscript do not<br />

Standard error of the mean.<br />

Determined by acld hydrolysis.<br />

BARI.EY<br />

8.1<br />

4tÅÏ<br />

?o.6G<br />

?7 3E<br />

60.18<br />

?L.5y<br />

?â.61<br />

6?.8F<br />

n.?F<br />

67.0I<br />

6?.2'<br />

8À. tc<br />

70. oq<br />

lt:2t<br />

?L.7r<br />

?2,8F<br />

83.58<br />

e-2<br />

"x<br />

0.49<br />

0.lrg<br />

o.62<br />

o.57<br />

1.02<br />

o.?5<br />

0.lrO<br />

o.73<br />

0.53<br />

0.68<br />

0.83<br />

o.26<br />

o.55<br />

o.2g<br />

0.49<br />

o.59<br />

o.66<br />

o.2g<br />

differ signifÍcantfy (P(0.05 ).<br />

.\)<br />

¡\)


TABLE r8. The effect of dietary fiber rever and weight of the rats on the<br />

metabolic faecal amino acid and nitrogen ãxcretionl .<br />

I,EVEL OT<br />

ALPHAFLOC<br />

vrEIcHT (g )<br />

AMINO ACTDS3<br />

Essentíal<br />

ARG<br />

HÏS<br />

TLE<br />

LEU<br />

LYS<br />

!ET4<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

v.dt<br />

Non- Es sent lal<br />

-Trã-<br />

ASP<br />

GI,U<br />

ctr<br />

PBO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NTÎROGEN<br />

(/")<br />

?L<br />

. ot6eP<br />

.00?r:<br />

.0214b<br />

.v6?9<br />

.o2gbtr<br />

.01049<br />

,o2cD:<br />

.o2792<br />

.0267v<br />

.822c^<br />

.o523y<br />

.0619P<br />

.0286b<br />

.o8r+P<br />

.02622<br />

.0180rr<br />

.263sAB<br />

t0<br />

207<br />

.01919<br />

.0078:<br />

.o1g4b<br />

. 03 28p<br />

.o2?trö<br />

. oo82!<br />

.0192:<br />

.o2l+?P<br />

.o236u<br />

.o2g2c<br />

.04789<br />

.0569P<br />

.0281ö<br />

.02298<br />

.0247:<br />

.0164rr<br />

.220L8<br />

I Means are.expressed as grams excreted per lOO grarns of dry matter intake of<br />

2<br />

3<br />

l+<br />

the proteln-free diets.<br />

Standard error of the mean.<br />

Means in the same row with the same superscript do not differ signlflcantly (p


lighter than for the heavier rats when these were fed the<br />

zOitr alphafLoc protein-free diets.<br />

The differences due to weight, al_though significant,<br />

were of smal1 magnitude. Liost variation was due to the<br />

Ieve1 of alphafloc in the protei_n-free d.iets as is shown<br />

by the large mean squares for test diets (Appendix, Table 2).<br />

The metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion increased<br />

as the level of alphafloc was raised. i{owever, there was no<br />

signíficant di.fference between the nitrogen excretion of the<br />

lighter rats fed the IAf, alphafloc protein-free diet and for<br />

the heavier and lighter rats fed Lhe 2O,4" alphafloc protein-<br />

free diet (Table 18). lt/ith the exception of conta¡nination<br />

from urinary nitrogen, no satisfactory explanation can be<br />

given for this observation.<br />

Stud-v 2.<br />

Study 2a.<br />

the nitrogen content decreased from wheat to barJ-ey<br />

to corn. The l-eve1s of crude and acid-detergent fiber were<br />

some!¡hat higher for corn that for wheat while the level_ of<br />

neutrar-detergent fiber was srightry lower. chemical analysis<br />

showed that approximately 7 O/" oî alphafloc is actualÌ), crude<br />

fiber (Tab]e 19).<br />

ìfith the exceptlon of LEU, LïS and t"ET tÌre 1eve1s<br />

of essential amino acids decreased from wheat to barley to


TABL'E 19. Proxinatçr -acid and neutral-detergent fiber, starch and chromic oxide<br />

analysesr-for diets in jiuãy z.<br />

DTETS<br />

LEVEL 0F ALPHArroc (ø)<br />

TTE¡4S (y'gT<br />

Nitrogen<br />

Ether extract<br />

Fiber<br />

Ash<br />

Crude<br />

Acid-detergent<br />

Neutral-detergent<br />

S tarch<br />

Chromic oxide<br />

2.22<br />

r.89<br />

5.37<br />

7.3U<br />

2L.47<br />

5.32<br />

64.3i<br />

o,L7<br />

1 Percent expressed on a dry weight basis.<br />

hIHEAT<br />

2.00 2.6L<br />

3,87 t.?o<br />

2.62 2.56<br />

3,95 3.57<br />

LL.73 t2.22<br />

I+.76 b.29<br />

72.1+O 66.65<br />

o.5z o.43<br />

MATNTENANCE<br />

7 Lt+<br />

o.66<br />

1.30<br />

L.95<br />

o.66<br />

L.L7<br />

9.62<br />

O.53 O.5t+<br />

{


corn. The level of LTS decreased frorn barley to wheat to<br />

corn. The levels of LEIJ and I,GT lrere highest in corn<br />

(Tab1e 20). The results obtained for TRy from duplicate<br />

analyses on diets and digesta varled extensi-ve1y. There_<br />

fore, TRT was not considered in these studies.<br />

The metabolic ilea1 and faecal amino acid levels<br />

were estj-rnated at 2 levels of dietary fiber by aid of the<br />

ii-7 and i'.i- 14 diets . These d.iets contained d;?o casein.<br />

Protein-free diets are usuarry emptoyed for the estination<br />

of rnetabolic Losses. i{owever, low dietarl, consumption<br />

caused b¡r palatability problerns with pigs fed protein_free<br />

diets is often a major problem. It was not *,,hought advisable<br />

to subject the cannul-ated pigs to this extra stress. Oon_<br />

sequently, a highly digestible protein at a low level_<br />

(4Ø casein) was included in the protein-free diets. These<br />

di.ets were named maintenance diets. ft v,ra s assumed at this<br />

time that all anrino acid.s from casein woulC be absorbed b],<br />

the end of the smal1 intestine and that'the ireal and faecar<br />

Ievels found by feedlng the maintenance diets lr.oul_d be<br />

representative of the netabolic levels.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> order to avoid. complications due to blockage<br />

(which could have resulted in permanent problerns), the ÌL_ld<br />

diet was not fed prior to the cereal test. diet seouence<br />

but only near the end of the conplete experiment (Fig. 2).<br />

/o


TABIE 20. Anino acid composition of diets for study 2.<br />

DIETS<br />

AMINO ACTDS<br />

Essential<br />

--Tr-d-_<br />

HIS<br />

ïtE<br />

LEU<br />

TTS<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

lHR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-E<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

l+<br />

ASP<br />

cYs<br />

GLU<br />

GLT<br />

Pn0<br />

SER<br />

TTR<br />

BARI,EY<br />

v,t e/r6sr.? %<br />

o.57 4.10 0.¿+5<br />

o.23 L.66 0.25<br />

o.39 2.81 AJ5<br />

0.86 6.r9 1.31<br />

o.t+z 3.O2 O.3t*<br />

0. r93 L.37 o.253<br />

0. ó0 t+.32 O . 52<br />

o.3e 2.7t+ 0.36<br />

a.5b 3.89 0.t+6<br />

o.¿g<br />

0.69_<br />

o.22t<br />

2.93<br />

0.49<br />

I.22<br />

o.5o<br />

0.36<br />

g/r6sN<br />

Percent expressed on a dry natter basis.<br />

urams per slxteen grams of nitrogen.<br />

Deterrnined by the oxidation nethod.<br />

Deternined by acid hydrolysis.<br />

I',HEAT<br />

3.6L<br />

2. Ol<br />

2.81<br />

10.5t<br />

2.73<br />

2.00<br />

\.L7<br />

2.89<br />

3.69<br />

3.t+6 o.za 6.10 O.49<br />

4.97 0.72^ 5.77 0.68^<br />

r.59 0.20J 1.60 o-2dJ<br />

21.10 2.Og 16.76 \..44<br />

3.53 0.40<br />

8.78<br />

3.2L O.57<br />

0.8À 6.71+ L.t+5<br />

3.60 0.¡r<br />

2.59<br />

à.09 0.63<br />

0.40 3.2I 0.r+1<br />

e/r6eu<br />

M-7<br />

0.58 3.56 o.12<br />

o.29 L.?8 0.10<br />

0. r+t+ 2.7o 0.19<br />

o.97 5.95 0.38<br />

oJa 2.2L 0.30<br />

o.243 L.L? 0.104<br />

o .67 l+. 11 0. 21<br />

o.39 2.39 0.l_6<br />

o.55 3.37 0.2b<br />

3 .00<br />

l+.L7<br />

L.72<br />

27.23<br />

3.50<br />

8.89<br />

3.86<br />

2.5L<br />

g/rógN<br />

2.95<br />

2.t+6<br />

L.67<br />

9.3t+<br />

7.37<br />

2.42<br />

5.L6<br />

3.93<br />

5.90<br />

o. 13 3 .20<br />

o.3z 7.86<br />

o.92 22.6L<br />

0.09 2.2L<br />

o.39 9.59<br />

o.3O 1t.92<br />

0.17 4.18<br />

o.L2<br />

0.10<br />

0.20<br />

0.39<br />

0.29<br />

0.104<br />

0.20<br />

0.16<br />

o.2t+<br />

M-14<br />

g/r69N<br />

2.95<br />

2,1+6<br />

l+.92<br />

9.59<br />

7.L3<br />

2'ltz<br />

I+.92<br />

3.93<br />

5.90<br />

0.1'+ 3.4t+<br />

o.33 8.11<br />

o.9r 22.37<br />

0.09 2.2t<br />

o.l,.o 9.83<br />

0.19 t+.67<br />

o.L7 t_8<br />

'+.


Three sepa:.a-t,e consecutive 8-hour 1lea1 collections<br />

v¡ere carried out. îhe sailples vrere frozen anC s.to:.ed.<br />

Accident.! ],, several il-eal anci faecal coll_ectíons were re_<br />

n:oved from the fr.eezer. anci v¡er.e spoiled. The iteal semples<br />

lhat were spoiled were the firs-r, and thj-rd 6-hour collections<br />

frorc pig number 1 fed rvheai: and the second and third iieal<br />

colleciions fron pig nunber 6 fed wheat. in additj-on, all<br />

ileal and faecal- saraples from the second tine the i'.-Z<br />

diet r,'ra s fed were spoiled.<br />

The amino acid end chromic oxide composition of<br />

every 8-hour i1eal coliection of pig number Z, 7, 3 ana 4<br />

t¿hen fed wheât are contpared in ïable 2I . There r,,ere only<br />

snaLL differences between the ind.i.¡idual ô-hour collections<br />

for each pig. This finding u,as no! unexpected since t,he<br />

aní¡¡als v¡ere fed j tines daily, the sarne aaount at each<br />

feeding and exactl)¡ 6 hours apert. Uncier the experiinen-r,ai<br />

conditions cami"ed out, the data show that the anino acid<br />

and chrorcic oxide content from i1eal digesta froil lvheat<br />

obtained during each singì-e 8-hour corlection is representa-<br />

tive of that obtained during a conplet,e 2i+-hour lleal<br />

collection.<br />

the apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />

avail-abili|ies of the cereal grains ai,e shown in Table 22.<br />

The i1eal a¡¿ino acid availabilities were obtained fronr<br />


TABLE 21, Comoarisonsl ôf the indlvlduaL etght_hour lleal collections fron wheat<br />

fo¡:' study 2å.<br />

NU¡IIBF.R OF PIG<br />

TII,ÍE OF<br />

COLLECTION¿<br />

¡{rNo AcrDs (ø )3<br />

Essentlal<br />

_rF-6-<br />

HIS<br />

ILE<br />

LEU<br />

LYS<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essentlal<br />

ÄLÀ<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

lTR<br />

cHRoMlc oxrDE(ø)<br />

I<br />

3<br />

o.34 0.34<br />

0.t6 0.r8<br />

0.26 0.26<br />

o.49 0.t+9<br />

O.3t+ O.)4<br />

0.I r o.31<br />

0.36 O.J5<br />

0.40 0.40<br />

o,43 O.t+2<br />

0-63 0.62<br />

I.22 1.20<br />

o.53 0.5r<br />

0.64 0.6r.<br />

0.36 O,35<br />

o.77 0.I9<br />

r.66 L.39<br />

9,22 9.32 o.3? o.22 g.?7 o.27. o.2? o.32 o.2g o.33<br />

9.\7 o.L7 0.18 0.16 o.ià ó:i6 õ:ii o.rô 0.1À o-17<br />

9.29 0.r0 o.ze o.2? g.ii o.aá ó'.àä -o'.âë, o:ài ó:äâ<br />

9.*? 9-5t o.53 o.iî_ 9.i+ ó:r-4<br />

9.2) 0.39 0.38 o]? õ:ü o.trs ó:4ö õ:;;<br />

9.àç o.äg ó-.äá o.ii o.iÍ ó.1;<br />

o.3i 9.21 0.3e 9.36 o]i<br />

o.Lr<br />

o.3\<br />

o-r2<br />

g.ie ó.ãí ó:ãí õ'.'2â ó:ii ó:iL<br />

o.je o.\j o.4r o.t2 9.3? o.it<br />

o.jä<br />

o:ü<br />

o:i3 oll ó:tt ó.3î<br />

ó:ii, o.tz õ'.ii ó:ii<br />

9.+2 o.rL 0.5r o.5? g.2t g)7 o.3? o.43 o.br+ o.L¿<br />

9.q? 0.Bo 0.76 o.i7 9.t\ 9:t, ó.ii o.ò:z ó'.ð; o:äi<br />

l.?o r.to r.Lo r]j 9.?1 Þ.çe ó:'si) L.z2 t.zi i-.ái<br />

9.i.1 0.90 0.?3 0.i\ 9.í,4 o.+i ó'.ä o.id 0-.16 õ:i6<br />

9.92 9.65 0.63 o.5q 9.1i o:¿é ó:ií o.Èà o.iÇ -o.íé,<br />

9.25. 0.&,+<br />

0.18 o.zl<br />

o.Lt 0.43.<br />

o.2o o.rs S.iZ o.iz Q:2t o.1i<br />

ó:iâ<br />

ö:íi<br />

o.tt, o.5s õ:;;<br />

o.i¿ ó:íí ó:í6<br />

L.69 r.29 1,39 r.31 r.7g 1.6¡* r.62 r.6t+ 1.5r t.56<br />

Conparlsons for DIE nulnbel^ l and_ó coutd noù be made<br />

the first 8-hour- (õ-B) €incê only the second (S_ló)<br />

rrear and<br />

ãoirèciion" iãJpããtiiäiy'v.,ere avalrabLe.<br />

Tlne lnterval åfter the stârt of the collectlon.<br />

Percent expressed on a dry natter baBis.


TABLE 22. Apparent iLeal and<br />

ín study 2a.<br />

CEREAI GRATN<br />

LOCATTON<br />

AMINO AcrDS (ø)4<br />

Ess ential<br />

--r.m-<br />

HTS<br />

ILE<br />

LEU<br />

tYS<br />

¡,ßT5<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

toq-Essential_<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

crs5<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

lYR<br />

NITNOGEN (ø)<br />

DRY MATTER (ø)<br />

1<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

ÏIEUM<br />

87.bc<br />

8d.3D<br />

8?.sA<br />

s2.5+<br />

82. oA<br />

91.94<br />

90.548<br />

78.98<br />

84.98<br />

CORN<br />

FAECES<br />

92.24<br />

93.648<br />

88. ra<br />

e3. s4<br />

83. OA<br />

89.54<br />

9L'?A<br />

8634<br />

88.24<br />

88.54 90.84<br />

å?:ii' 33'2i"<br />

9l-.8c 94.18<br />

7L.zc g6.zÃ<br />

80.r+c %.LA,<br />

84.98 9r.oA<br />

89.04 go.2A<br />

82.4n d9.48<br />

80. zB 89.ÀA<br />

faecal amlno acid availabilitiesl of the cereal gralns<br />

I\IHEAT<br />

ILEUM3 FAECES<br />

85.8c gz.7^<br />

89.rcÐ 9L.gA<br />

8:-.lB 89.t4<br />

ir?E 3å ?f<br />

d6,64 BB.9A<br />

88.BBc gz.5Ã<br />

?6.5c 86.?A<br />

82.84 88.94<br />

?t+.02<br />

z7'.r^<br />

92.?BC<br />

n.7c<br />

86-88<br />

8ll. rB<br />

85.98<br />

82.9D<br />

nlc<br />

8r,. oB<br />

ai. rB<br />

%.74<br />

9?.oÃ<br />

89.34<br />

96.74<br />

92.54'<br />

89.54<br />

9L.24<br />

89. OA<br />

BARLET<br />

ÏI,EUM FAECES<br />

8L.5D 89.IrB<br />

80.¿E 91.98c<br />

?s.{ 83.18<br />

sl.51 s6.6:<br />

73.3" 77.5"<br />

80.lB 79.98<br />

82.2D 87.9C<br />

?t.zD dr.4B<br />

78. oc 8rÞ.38<br />

69.78<br />

zr.zD<br />

7?.68<br />

86.6D<br />

?L.2D<br />

go.9c<br />

76Jc<br />

79.?c<br />

?t+.98<br />

66.2D<br />

?7.t*<br />

l":?i"<br />

92.?BC<br />

82.68<br />

92 j.A<br />

86.98<br />

85. oB<br />

85,9c<br />

83. óB<br />

Each vaLue Ís the rnean of 6 observations. 2 standard error of the rnean.<br />

rreal availabilities from pig numb er 1 and 6 were based on singl-e d-hour coLLections.<br />

Means in the same row with the sarne superscrlpt do not differ slgnlfícantly (F


pooling of the 3 individual 8-hour collecti_ons that were<br />

derived fro¡n each of the cereal grains. However, apparent<br />

ileal anino acid availabilities from pig nu¡nber I and. ó<br />

were based on one single 8-hour collection. Both ileal and<br />

faecal amino acid availabilities r¡ere deterrnined by the<br />

chromic oxide nrethod (ùrampton and Harris, L96gl . For tl¡e<br />

cÌeterminat j.on of Ì:äT and CYS availabilities, faeces froil<br />

the 2 pigs, fed the s arne diet during each particular test<br />

perioci , were pooled anci analyzed (FiS . ,2 ) . The inciivi.cÌual<br />

apparent ileal and faecal emino acid availabilities and<br />

analyses of variance ere shov¡n in the appendix (Table 3, 4,<br />

5, 61 7 and 8)<br />

There were no significant differences between<br />

the apparent faecal availabilities of essential amino acids<br />

from wheat and corn (ta¡Ie eZ). The avaÍlabilities of<br />

essential anino acids from wheat and corn were signifi.cantly<br />

higher than those from barley. The differences in iTS<br />

availabilities were of a sna1l magnitude. They were 8J.0,<br />

80.7 and 77.5% f$ corn, wheat and barley respectively.<br />

the apparent faecal availabilities of the non-<br />

essentj.al amino acids from wheat and corn were higher than<br />

those from barley. îhe availabilities of .A,l,A and ASp frorrr<br />

corn were significantly higher than those from wheat. There<br />

were no significant differences between the apparent pRO<br />

availabilities of the cereal grains tested.<br />

81


Cenerail¡2, the ir eaJ_ evaila.oiiities cî aihj.nc aciis<br />

decreasecì irc: corn l,o r,vheat tc Larl=¡.. :he :,;S ai-?:la:.ilit.,<br />

1n par.ticul ar, iecreased frcrn 52.C tc ì5,7 io lj )),: îor<br />

corn, wheat anci barJ_e1' respectil'e1:¡.<br />

F¡ecai a...aile'cilii_i.es lr'ere hlgher t,han ileel<br />

aveilabillties for alI anino ecids ícr e¿ch cf -,,he ce:.eal<br />

grains tesied. îhe di.fferences were largest for .,1ìG, iils, :i_iì,<br />

'-:LY , ln l.) and S-1,. ïn nost cases, there r¡as l-ess difference<br />

between ileai anci faecai anino acid availebilities frcni corn<br />

than fron r^heet end barley. For instance, the di_fference<br />

fcr LYS was 1í for corn anci 5 and tr.2í,, f or wheet end berie¡,<br />

respectivel;'. ihe ciifference fcr ?ijR was 7,L, LC.2 ana<br />

10. 2Íi for corn, wheat and 'oarì-ey resçeciive11,.<br />

Threcnine rvas the Ieast avail_able essential anino<br />

aciC for corn anci barley lr,hen deternineC at the end c.f the<br />

ileun. L:-'sine wes the lease available aninc acic fron corn<br />

ânC 'oa.rie1' when dete:.nined by the faecai enalr,sis nethci.<br />

i¡rsine rvas the I east available a¡:.ino aciC frc: uhe at<br />

regardiess oÍ lleal or íaecel cciiection (?abie 22).<br />

Si¿:ni_f icant pig e ífect s were obserl-eci ic:: so:e enino<br />

aciis (LppenCi.x, îa'cle 6 znd. 7 ) . lhe appe:.ent aninc acid<br />

availabilities .íron pig nu:::'cer i (replacer:eni pig ) ,¡ere<br />

generaì-l¡,' lolver than thcse of the cther pigs, in par-ticr-tlar,<br />

when Ceternined at the eni cí the ileu:n. The latter resul_ted<br />

82


also in several significant pig x location interactions.<br />

Ðry natter digestibilities based on total ileal<br />

dry matter collectÍon and chromj.c oxide levels r4¡ere nearly<br />

the same for the cereal grains (Table 23). <strong>fn</strong>dividual<br />

compari-sons are shown in the appendix (Tab1e 3, t+ and 5).<br />

Dry r,ratter digestibilities determined by chromic oxide<br />

level-s were lower for Ii-7 and I,l- 14 than when deterrnined by<br />

total ileaI drl' rnatter excretion. Data obtained from l,ì_Z<br />

represent those fron the first Z\-hour ileal colrect,ion<br />

that r,¡as cåried out. Lack of experience with regard to<br />

the collection p'ocedure resuried in unforeseen r.osses of<br />

ileal digesta at that time. Elockage and associated problems<br />

occurred someti¡les when the pigs were fed the Ii_Z diets<br />

but very often when they were fed the ¡.!-14 diets. For the<br />

[î-14 diet, feed. intake r^¡as very irregular and. meals were<br />

often skipped. some pigs started nibbring instead of con-<br />

suming the nreals within a short time after feeding. The<br />

average daíIy dry matter intakes by the pigs fed jri_ 7 and<br />

l'Í-14 were 1486 (B?.8j1 of allowable intake) and 9i5 grar¿s<br />

(trt.91t" of alLowable intake) respectively (Appendix, Table<br />

9 and 10). The cereal test diets in these studies were<br />

alwa1.s consumed within t hour after feeding (ie . IOU/" of<br />

allowable intake ) and the anount of ileal dry natter<br />

collected during 3 consecutive g_hour coll_ections coulci oe<br />

83


TABLE 23. Conparison of ileal_ dry natter d.igestibilitiesl<br />

based on total dry natter excretiõn and chronic<br />

oride levels.<br />

Measurenent Total Chro¡dc<br />

' Oxide<br />

DIETS<br />

Barley (6)z<br />

corn (6)<br />

Wheat (t¡)<br />

NIaínbenance, flo<br />

alphafloc (5)<br />

Maintenanee, 14f<br />

alphafloc (6)<br />

6?.LL!2.87<br />

80. 0612 . L6<br />

n.Ltto.?7<br />

88.52t2.54<br />

èt+.StS.Zz<br />

Mean and standard devi.ation.<br />

66.L?b.86<br />

80.18t0.7?<br />

73.25t2.O5<br />

86.55te.49<br />

76.$tO ?,t+<br />

values in parentheses i.ndieate the nunber of observatioos.<br />

84


e'l ateci back to i,he total dr¡,, natter intake from l feedin3s.<br />

fleai d:';,r metteÌ' digestibili!1es based on -i,otal ileal cli,1.<br />

niatter r¡.,ere calculated on the basis of the lâtt,er prj-nciple.<br />

Îhe higher i1eal dry Ììietier d.ige stib ilit ie s obteined frorr<br />

l.--7 and Ì.-1d by totaL iLeal dry n:at.r,er levels than b;r<br />

ch:'o¡ric oxide level_s in pârt reflect the l_ov,,er in-uake oÍ<br />

these diets bi' the pigs in compårison to their allowable<br />

dail"v dry nat ter intake .<br />

ïhe average n:etabclic ileal and íaecal anino acid<br />

and nitrogen lerels, expressecÌ as grat:s per lOO grams of ciry<br />

r'Ër-ter intake, ai'e shown in Table 24, The individual rcetabolic<br />

ileal and faecal anino acj-cì l_eveìs of the pigs are shown in<br />

the appendix (Table 9 and IO). AII j-leal anC faecal collections<br />

from pigs feci iì:e i",-7 diet follouin¿ the cereal test ciiet<br />

sequence lrere spoiJ_ed. pig nunber ó, fed i:_7 prior to the<br />

cereal test di.e t sequence, went off feed the Cay before the<br />

ileal collection was carried out.<br />

I'lot taklng into account the possible eflect oi bcd;.<br />

weight on metabolic and faecal arnino aciii levels, these<br />

leve1s lvere increased as the level of alphafloc lr,a s raised<br />

from 7 to IU,/h (fa¡le e4). For both the i;_Z and i,i_14 diets,<br />

there was a net l-oss (as gr.ans per 100 gran:s of dry nnatter<br />

intake ) of total nitrogen betueen the end of the ileum and<br />

the anus. there was a net disappearence of ARG, G.l,U, GLï,


TABLE 24. Metabolic ileal and faecal amino acid l-evelsl fron study 2a.<br />

PERTOD OF<br />

COLIfiCTION<br />

LEVEL OF<br />

ATPHAFTOC (%)<br />

tocATr0N<br />

AMTNO ACTDS<br />

EssentLal<br />

ARG<br />

HTS<br />

ÏLE<br />

LEU<br />

ï,ïs<br />

¡{ET5<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

vÂt<br />

Non-Ess entia].<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TTR<br />

NÏTROGEN<br />

L<br />

2<br />

3<br />

l+<br />

5<br />

BEFORE CEREAT DTETS2<br />

rtEUM (5)4<br />

o. ol8a1-9.9119<br />

0.0126t0.0033<br />

o. ole$fs.9s3s<br />

0.04241s. ss99<br />

o.0356to.0061<br />

0. oo88to. oo15<br />

0.0224t9.9s56<br />

0.0444ro.0082<br />

o. ol8À3s, es63<br />

0. o¡42fq. es96<br />

o . 066210. 0071<br />

0.12381O.0115<br />

o,11l}6to.O'+25<br />

o.3t.J8!O.L2t+3<br />

0.0670t0. 006¡l<br />

o.0t_82t0.0042<br />

0.2148á0.038I<br />

7<br />

FAECES (5)<br />

o. 0288to. o12o<br />

0,01il**9.9934<br />

o.0332t9. s665<br />

0.0502t9. s162<br />

o.o456to. o13r<br />

o. or62to. 0056<br />

o.o3rsts. ss99<br />

O.O)t¡2t9.9939<br />

0. o38oto.0101<br />

O.0l¡62ta.9119<br />

o. o72o+0.0189<br />

0.0946ts. s2sg<br />

o. Olf$ts. s111<br />

o.ol8$1s.s131<br />

0. ol6$ts. s676<br />

0.oz32*o.060?<br />

0.1,Ì3610.0368<br />

AFTER CEREAL DTETS3<br />

rLEUpr (6)<br />

0. o4óoto. 0056<br />

0.017710.O01+t<br />

o.0352!O.Ot+Iz<br />

0.Ot¡[/*g.9933<br />

o. o4e$19. ss2s<br />

0.0110*0. o0og<br />

o. o238to.0029<br />

o.045516.ss34<br />

0.041$16.9s23<br />

0. 0572tO.0117<br />

o.o732IO.OO22<br />

O.ll¡2lta.9192<br />

o.u52t0.0690<br />

0.5548t0.31184<br />

o. o752JO. O14O<br />

0.0178*0.0013<br />

o,3oíJts.s545<br />

l'Íeans, expressed as grams per 1O0 gram dry matter intake, ánd standard deviation.<br />

No lLeaL and faecal co[ections were avairab]-e fro¡n pig nunber ó.<br />

fleal and faecal collections frorn M-/, fed foLlowing the cereal test diet sequence<br />

were spol1ed.<br />

Numbers 1! parentheses indicate the number of observations.<br />

uetermlned by acid hydrolysis.<br />

rl}<br />

¡'AEcES (6)<br />

0. o347ts. e13s<br />

o.Ot52t6.9422<br />

o. o442tO. Olr+3<br />

o.oó81J0.0292<br />

o.056?!0.o2oz<br />

0.019810. Oo74<br />

o.04o7ts.9171<br />

0.0468t0.0172<br />

o. 051oå0. ol7ó<br />

O.o632ts.s3a<br />

0.0943+0. o3o9<br />

o.rz5oxo.0376<br />

O.o497ts.sa92<br />

0.0665!9.ç2a2<br />

0;0502*0. O13O<br />

o.0302*0.0L21<br />

o.L%3*O.0666<br />

@ cl..


P.Ê;C anci SER. ?he net disappeai'ance was verl.¡ iarÊje ior<br />

Pi.O anci GiY. ,,euci_ne , i,t S, Ì'lJT, pi.jJ, ASp anci Tïi. snor,ved<br />

a nei increase from the end of the ileum to -,he anus.<br />

The metabolic ileat levels of pi,O and cLT varied<br />

extensivel¡r from pig to pig. <strong>fn</strong> general , the variation in<br />

1eve1s for the other amino acids was nuch 1e s s (Appendix,<br />

?able 9 ) . I'iost varÍation betl^reen the netabolic. faecal<br />

amino acid levels of the pigs coulC be attributed to pig<br />

nun?ber 1. The metabolic faecal anino acid levels of this<br />

pig were about twice as high as lhose of the other pigs<br />

(Appendix, Table 10).<br />

Lit/hüV ¿U.<br />

The appareni faecal amino acid availabilities<br />

deternined fror: ó normal pigs viere verJ¡ close to those<br />

deterr¿ined from the cannulated. pigs. The largest dif_<br />

f erences rniere found for barle}' end rangei fron l_ .2 tc 4.8<br />

pei'centage uniis for pRO and TIih. r.especti-ve1¡r (Tab1 e 22 an|<br />

¿, ) . ! aecar avaÍr-abilit'ie s fron corn and whea! rnrere neari¡r<br />

identica.l for cannulated and nornoal pigs. The iTS availa_<br />

bilities of nornel pigs were 8I .e, 79.g ênd. 7 j,J,.. f or corn,<br />

wheat anci barley respec-r,ive1]¡. <strong>fn</strong> the såne ord,er, chey we:,e<br />

83, 8,O.7 and.7?.jì; ior the cannulated pigs (TabJ_e 22 and Z)).<br />

The apparent a¡iino acid availabilities fron pig<br />

number ó were lower than -uhose of the otjier 5 pigs. .ihese<br />

ö/


¿ J{DJ¿ú ¿) ,<br />

CER¡AL GRATN CORN<br />

a<br />

AìirNo ActDs ø)-<br />

_Er-<br />

ìeea¡+.i ^ l<br />

HTS<br />

rtE<br />

.1.ìtTl<br />

LÏS<br />

Iiõ13<br />

PTiE<br />

¡: u:<br />

vA!<br />

Iln¡-liec--+.i ^1 ff:* têD<br />

r/-1T TT<br />

GIT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NITROc,Ð\r (ø)<br />

DRT l,:ATTiR (ø)<br />

Apparent faecaL airxi-no ecid. availabiliij_es<br />

of the cereel_ grains, in aCciiiiãn i;--nr-trogen<br />

and dry natter dige stibi.Iitie s<br />

I'or study 2b.<br />

or ,Ä<br />

92.uB<br />

87.84<br />

%.6r'<br />

81.84<br />

87.44<br />

9t.zE<br />

ô5.9L<br />

Ê': lA<br />

go.2A<br />

8ó. OA<br />

o2 dB<br />

86. oË<br />

oe ,.Ë<br />

on ÁA<br />

90. oA<br />

88. 5A<br />

89. oA<br />

Standard error of the r¡ean of 6<br />

Means ^in the sarne row with the<br />

significanrLy (p<br />

ô A? Ê<br />

r.660<br />

o.+16<br />

o.478<br />

n ??o<br />

0. 5r8<br />

^ Aa1<br />

0.552<br />

U.IòU<br />

observations per treatmen! .<br />

88<br />

sane superscript do not differ


dj-íferences were significan-t for pli¡ ancì Ar,À (Appendix,<br />

Table 11 ) . The inciiviiuel faecal_ a¡,:ino acid avai.Iab i1i*,, ie s<br />

fro¡n the pÍgs are shoun j-n the appenciix (?able J'Z, Lj, I4).<br />

The netabolic faecai a¡nino acid excretion in_<br />

creaseci as the i-evel of alphafloc was raised in -r,he<br />

iraintenance diets (Tebie 26).<br />

I7ith the exception of ARG and pHi there r,,jere no<br />

significant dii-ferences ciue to weighi (Appendix, Tabie 15).<br />

The p j-gs diff ered approxinatel¡.,- I C kg . in weight between i jre<br />

first and second tir,'Le thelr r^¡ere feci the sene naintenance<br />

ciiet. The ¡retabolic faecal_ Afr.G and pliE excretion were sig_<br />

nificantly higher for the lighter than heavier pígs fed the<br />

l.i-14 diet (Tabl_e 26). The individual pig d.å.-,,a ere shown in<br />

the appendix (?able 1ó and lZ).<br />

i_etabolic faecal anino acid e:ccretions were<br />

approxi-nate iy 3AÍí higher for Nhe r:.oxri¡âl than f or -i,he can_<br />

nul-âted pigs (Table 24 and, 26). As stated previousl¡,,,<br />

¡here was consiCerable variation in the net,abolic faecal<br />

anino acid excretion in study 2a. îhe variation that was<br />

observed could be lai.gel¡, attribut,eci ro one particular pig.<br />

Stuciy 3<br />

This study was subdi_vided into Z separate experinenrs.<br />

Study Ja deals with the inîusj.on of j.soleted soy p¡oiein. .,:jx_<br />

perinent lb invorved the infusi-on o.f rysine monohyciro chr-ori.cie<br />

i-nto the caecun.<br />


ì i+;. La ¿a . l.ìetabolic faecal anino acid<br />

for stud,w 2b.<br />

P]P.TOÐ CF<br />

t0LL;CTIOi'i<br />

ÞEFORI cE.,ìt]i,i<br />

iiliris<br />

ÁFTLR 'lltulÁi<br />

ÐËis<br />

L;I¿:I OF<br />

ALPHAFL0C (;3) 14<br />

!+<br />

A:lr}ÍO ACTÐS3<br />

Esç9Et ial<br />

-{'-LLl<br />

i-tIs<br />

rj.E<br />

lTs<br />

i i.C¡ l'Y<br />

P;iE<br />

iFR<br />

VAL<br />

IIon-f,s sent ia1<br />

AiÁ<br />

ASP<br />

L'L U<br />

GLY<br />

I)5 /\<br />

c:1D<br />

}JÏTROGE}.I<br />

)<br />

3<br />

ne oBC<br />

. OO8B<br />

.0278<br />

. o4tE<br />

.OTÐ<br />

. 012E<br />

-oz5bc<br />

.ozgB<br />

.03zB<br />

. o4oÊ<br />

.o628<br />

. oSoE<br />

.Q32B<br />

.03zÊ<br />

.$zE<br />

. olgB<br />

.11g8<br />

.úzA<br />

.0114<br />

.0394<br />

.060å<br />

.OL7A<br />

. OITA<br />

^^.4<br />

.uJo"<br />

.oÐA<br />

. o48A<br />

. o58A<br />

.0884<br />

.It4A<br />

. o46A<br />

.043Â<br />

.0434<br />

,O26L<br />

¡ z.A<br />

nr cC<br />

.oo7B<br />

.o2gË<br />

.Qj,6IÞ<br />

.03OE<br />

.012Ë<br />

. o20c<br />

.o?68<br />

. 03tB<br />

.vt ^- )- -Þ<br />

.o5?B<br />

. o87E<br />

ac¡B<br />

. 03oË<br />

.ú6b<br />

. 015E<br />

.1218<br />

qô<br />

and nitrogen levelsl<br />

e_2<br />

.o26L, .OO17O<br />

.012^ .00078<br />

.ol8Ä .oa253<br />

.oi4Å .oaLLz<br />

.o45!' .oo3o2<br />

.o2oå .OO14g<br />

.0318 .00226<br />

.036'A .oo3zt<br />

.0454 .oo3gz-<br />

.or| .oo4o5<br />

.0884 .oozol<br />

.1124 .OA76g<br />

.o4oA .oc2g3<br />

. o4oA .00254<br />

.044À .oozg9<br />

.o; L .oor9ô<br />

,v5A .00ð61<br />

i eans fron 5 observations, e:i)ressed per lOO gr.an of di.;r<br />

matter iniake.<br />

Standard, errcr of the nean.<br />

IlÍeans in- the sane row with .the same superscript do not differ<br />

significantlJ, G


jictar-r' arino ac il arc i:itt c-=en ::ral.'ses a:-: shc,¡;n in<br />

T:bIe 2?. ihe le .,'el of LTS fr.ci: ts+2¿Sp was C.15Í hiEher tÌ:an<br />

ih^t ^¡<br />

';-:-C) r:L¡ inÄir-ì.t.,^.1 t^+- ^-.<br />

'-i.dL Lr- .c.l-"1,1 .-. :îe r¡,*: v_!,-:4¿r .i6vc dt€ .ii'l:n in T¿b1e 23 a:;<br />

âre sunnerizei in ?a'c1e 29.<br />

T'he ancunt cf nitrcgon retain_.cÌ per då1, we s sig_<br />

nificantl;' higher for- E-2rS? than ícr. the cther 2 diets, fcr<br />

v;hich ihe dailir nitrcgen retentions 'ú¡ere al-most siril-ar (Tabre<br />

2c; .a.ppendix, Table 18). lhe retention of nitrclen, exÞressed<br />

pe :' 100 grans cf çi¡rr ¡-+lcr- intake, 'r'1¡e s apprcxinatellr I g. fcr<br />

the E'2i3P Ci:t and C.9 -E. fcr the i=_S? and Ë-fS?+J-I3? diets.<br />

The latter Ì,re s nct significant at the !i-, ]er.-el of significance ,<br />

but wes sísnificant at the 1O;:1 ler.el cf si::nificance. percent<br />

nit'o¡¡en retention and bi"clcrical va.rr:e we.e the highest fci.<br />

E+iSP and were significantl¡; highe:. than thcse .fcr E+iSp+a-ISp,<br />

bui not tiìan the values for E+2lSp.<br />

if all- caecal_l¡' infusei ISp h¿d 'ceen Cisestei, absorbeC<br />

anci utili zei tc the saäe ext3nt in the lar..3e ini-estlne as in the<br />

s¡nal-l intestine, then 18.0 g. cf niticgen v¡cu1C heve been re_<br />

te ined per dal¡ (ïa'ole 2ç ) . ff not ut ilizeC at all , it nai, be<br />

:xtrectei that 1i, Ê g. cf nitrcã3n wouli 1--e1,.3 been i"etained .f:.cn<br />

the cae cafl-;' fed fSP. îhe ercunt retê-ined fr.c:: Ë=iSp*C_ïSF<br />

'¡':a s jound tc '¡e 15.?1 C., ',rhich is cnj-v C.tI .r. I roie th.en<br />

lts.qr ''I < Êa 0.11 .<br />

Õl


T ABLE 27. Amino acid and nitrogen compositionl of test<br />

diets in stud../ 3.<br />

DIETS E1-¿!Ðr E+ISP E+ISP+LYS<br />

AlirNo AcrDS (ø)<br />

Essential<br />

--T-FG-<br />

HTS<br />

]LE<br />

LEU<br />

T!.e<br />

I.,:ET¿<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

--TÏÃ.- Non-Essential<br />

^ eD<br />

CYS¿<br />

CLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NTTROGEN (ø)<br />

0.88<br />

o.lo<br />

u. /)<br />

r.32<br />

o.7r<br />

ç.¿4<br />

0.96<br />

o .57<br />

o.87<br />

o.69<br />

1 ?ô<br />

0.21<br />

4.23<br />

0 .68<br />

o.7t<br />

0.44<br />

? .l+86<br />

I E*p"""""d as percent of dry matter.<br />

2 Ðetermined b:¡ the oxidatíon ¡irethcd.<br />

0.68<br />

c.27<br />

4.55<br />

1.03<br />

o.;6<br />

c. 21<br />

0.68<br />

o.so<br />

aì o<<br />

o.22<br />

3.39<br />

0.55<br />

L, J9<br />

4.55<br />

0.31,<br />

2.096<br />

e.66<br />

4.27<br />

4.55<br />

I.A2<br />

o.7t<br />

0.2I<br />

4.7 5<br />

0.68<br />

u.> /<br />

L O',1<br />

3 .Ll+<br />

t.)4<br />

v.) /<br />

V.JJ<br />

¿.vvL<br />

92


!tI-i,) Z¿ <strong>fn</strong>dividual dai ly niti"ogen intakes anC faecal ancl<br />

urinary losses and soíté calculated paraneters in<br />

study 3a.<br />

PERTOÐ ]I iir<br />

Pie no. I<br />

lìitrogen intake<br />

(s,/da.t )<br />

FaecaI nitroEen<br />

loss (g/da¡.)<br />

Urinar'¡ nitroeen<br />

1oss" (e/dal'J<br />

liitroeen retaíned<br />

t<br />

\ ál ^/;^--\ \rdl I<br />

I'iit:'ogen retained2<br />

Ìiitrogen retentì on<br />

(::)t<br />

EioL oli c al<br />

valüe (:í )4<br />

en intake<br />

Faeca1 nitrcgen loss<br />

Urinary nitrogen loss<br />

liitrogen retained<br />

l{itrogen retained.2<br />

liitrogen retentionS<br />

Ei.ological value4<br />

Þi¡: ¡n ?<br />

Ìrtitrogen iniake<br />

Faecal nitrogen loss<br />

ilrinary nitrðgen loss<br />

lJitroien retained<br />

tiitrolen retained2-<br />

Nitrogen retentionJ<br />

Ðiological value4<br />

(¡+ersp)l (E+rsp)<br />

,,'l ô(<br />

"AÔ<br />

16.80<br />

t7.?6<br />

t.o23<br />

4I.L4<br />

50. ó8<br />

34.88<br />

,7 20<br />

L).Ló<br />

14.31<br />

0. B6c<br />

41 .03<br />

52.06<br />

?'7 '7 Ò<br />

JñO<br />

14.41<br />

lo.Zy<br />

0.904<br />

43.tr<br />

53.06<br />

48.1ó<br />

ro.4z<br />

tt t,1<br />

15,42<br />

o.855<br />

32.O2<br />

4C.9L<br />

(B+ts?-ù-ïs?) (;-2ïsp)<br />

U+.45<br />

9.9s<br />

t8.¡z<br />

15.95<br />

0.95s<br />

46.27<br />

l+5 .l+5<br />

Ê (ô<br />

18.49<br />

r8.37<br />

1 .005<br />

l+O.42<br />

lþ9.81+<br />

I Abbreviations in parentheses indj_cate the clj.et fed-<br />

93<br />

(!+rsP+C- _iSP )<br />

)u.)ö<br />

o r.t<br />

2t+.61<br />

ro.J()<br />

o.867<br />

)..+t<br />

39.93<br />

+2!<br />

t+7 .54<br />

o . r,Lu<br />

)^ ,7^<br />

l-ó.Jó<br />

o.96t<br />

Ji5. OÞ<br />

40. yo<br />

rr: !ì-c Ð ì<br />

39.53<br />

t.¿)<br />

15.48<br />

1ó. 60<br />

o'89r<br />

52.A4<br />

" crans of n:trogen reteinec per r0o grans of cÌri' r:atter in-"ar;e.<br />

a<br />

Percent nitrogen retained..<br />

l::::lt nitrogen retained. fron_nitrogen absorbed; Ìietabolic<br />

reecer anc¡ endoãenous urinary l0sses were no! taken into âccoun!.


TABTU 29<br />

DT¡I1<br />

II!gq<br />

l'litrogen retained (g./rl"y )<br />

llltrogen retained3<br />

lJitrogen retention (Íl)4<br />

Eiological value iJí)5<br />

f tliourru with the<br />

2 Standard error<br />

3, +t 5 As shown<br />

The averagel amounts of nitrogen retained, nitrogen<br />

retentj-ons and biological values for dietå in stud.y ja.<br />

E+2ïSP<br />

18.004<br />

0.9t)6Â<br />

LO.o7A<br />

t+9.16Ã<br />

D+TSP<br />

same superscript in tire same ro!! do not differ significantry (p(.05).<br />

of tlle mean.<br />

in lab1e 28.<br />

r5.80ts<br />

0.8854<br />

L2.2rlqc<br />

roA<br />

B+]SP1.C-ISP<br />

L5,9LB<br />

0.8934<br />

T,46D<br />

42 378<br />

a,2<br />

¡Jx<br />

.27L8<br />

.oL5z6<br />

.62?r<br />

'1<br />

1. ¿1õ<br />

\o


¡¡¿¡ for E+ISP. Therefor:e, 'uhe rel-ative i.etention of caecat l:¡<br />

infused ISP r\tâs onl,.: Ji,I of ihat of orall'¡ supplied fSP.<br />

The average ni'r,rcgen intake, faecaÌ nitlogen 1oss,<br />

uriner:¡ nitrogen loss and retained nitr.ogen -,tere )7.UC, 7,Zt+,<br />

t4.ló anci 15.60 g. per day respectivelj¡ for the pigs fed<br />

bl-ISP. In the sarie order, ihese values were l+7 .66 , 9 .95 ,<br />

2l-.ð0 and 15.91 g. pe:' ciaT respecrir¡ely for pigs given<br />

Ë+ISP+C-ISP (fab1e Z6 and 29). Of the nitrogen caecaliy<br />

i:rfused which was IO.Z62¿., 2.7L3g. v¡as lost in the iaeces,<br />

7.++ag. was lost in the urine and O.t15S. was retained.<br />

Jxpresseci on a percentage basis, Zó.Lií of the nitrogen froln<br />

caecally infused ISP was excreted in the faeces, 72.5.)¡ was<br />

¿xcret:d in ihe uri ne and 1. !i:3 was retained by the pi-gs.<br />

Studv 3b.<br />

ihe indi'¡idual ciata are given in TabLe IO and are<br />

surnr::arized in Table JI. Dala fror,r pig nurnber 6 on t:.eatrnent<br />

E+fSP+C-LlS were not available. Statistical anall,ses coulci<br />

be perforned with the inclusion oí the calculated raissing<br />

values (Table li ) . i{owevei, this 'r¡¡ould. be of no use in<br />

1(ì - 0.li :)(1o.00<br />

\) - l_).õ0)( x ICO.<br />

2(g.;¡ + ro.37 + 10.85) : 3 = ra,z6. 3g.gs - 7.24 = 2.7L.<br />

4z1.so - rL.3ó = ?.t+4. 5t;.gt - 15.so : o.rrr.<br />

,o5


.¡;t Et f¡ ra\ ïndividual daily nitrogen intakes ancÌ faecal- and<br />

urinerj' lopses and sor:re calcul_ated parâneters<br />

in stud¡r Jb.<br />

PiRIOD rt rir<br />

intake<br />

Faeca1 nitrosen loss<br />

G/d.v)<br />

Urinary nitrogen l_oss<br />

G/aav ) -<br />

Nitrogen retained<br />

G/arv)<br />

r liitrogen retained.2<br />

I\,litrggen retention<br />

(fr)r<br />

eiijiogical value (ii)4<br />

Pìô ñ^ Â<br />

Nitrogen intake<br />

FaecaL nitrogen loss<br />

ürÍna::y nitrogen loss<br />

L itr:ogen retained^<br />

Nitrogen retained¿<br />

i'iitrolen retentipn3<br />

Eiological value4<br />

Píe no. ó<br />

üitrogen intake<br />

Faeca1 nitrogen loss<br />

Jrinari.' nitrogen Ìoss<br />

Nitrosen retained<br />

liitrolen retained2<br />

llitrogen ret entíonJ<br />

ljr-oIog]-caI val_ue¿+<br />

I, 21 3, l+<br />

5<br />

96<br />

(E+rsp+c-tys)1 (s+lsp+i,ys) (B+Isp)<br />

3t+.88<br />

/.LO<br />

13.04<br />

14.68<br />

0.882<br />

l.t ño<br />

53.L7<br />

(E+rsP )<br />

34.88<br />

7 .68<br />

1r ?o<br />

14.81<br />

0.900<br />

4¿.40<br />

5lt . lt5<br />

(E+ISP+LTS )<br />

35.o4<br />

7.62<br />

10.80<br />

16.62<br />

0.992<br />

+t.4)<br />

60.6t<br />

As shown in Table 28.<br />

2'7 ÕA<br />

6 't+6<br />

13 .50<br />

18.00<br />

n ool<br />

l+7.1+2<br />

57 .r4<br />

37 .79<br />

7 .39<br />

1t, aþ<br />

1ó'¡e<br />

ô oaìo<br />

t+3.34<br />


TAÐLì 3I. lY"frg?l anounts of nitrogen retained, nitrogen retentions and<br />

bi.ological values for dÍeis i.n stud1, jb.<br />

2<br />

DTjlTS<br />

ÏTU]:S<br />

I'litrogen retained (e/day)<br />

Nitrogen retained3<br />

ltritrogen retention4 (i¿)<br />

Eiological vatue5 (i3)<br />

Statistical analyses were not perforned.<br />

Values in parentheses do not include the<br />

IE<br />

* ¡ ) Âs shovrn in Table 28.<br />

BI'ISP-I-C-LYS<br />

r5.68<br />

0.877<br />

l+I ,97<br />

52.88<br />

(r5 . fi )z 17 .71+<br />

(0.896 ) 0.988<br />

(trz.zz) t*z.ztr<br />

(sl.sl) sq.oz<br />

n-!TQ D-LI ve E+ISP<br />

calculated missing values.<br />

l-5.36<br />

o.866<br />

4I.I5<br />

5t.27<br />

\o<br />

{


-r"his study since the error degrees of freedom woul_d. d.ecrease<br />

fyom 2 to 1 resu.lting in the increase of F critical fro¡n<br />

19.0 to 200.00 (at the J,rà leveL of significance).<br />

All pararaeters determined were the highest for<br />

E+ISP+LYS and the lowest for Ë+lSp. The values obtained<br />

for B+ISP+C-LTS were slightly higher than those of B+lSp<br />

(Table l1) .<br />

Including the calculated missing value the arílount<br />

of nitrogen retained per day increased by O.32I¿. upon LyS<br />

infusion ínto the caecua. Ora11y given LIS increased the<br />

arûount of nitrogen retained per day by Z.3g2e. (Table jI).<br />

Therefore, ihe relative irnprovement in nitrogen retained.<br />

per day (S. ) of caecally infused l,yS was only ll .t3il ot<br />

that oraliy supplÍed LYS.<br />

Study l¡.<br />

Study 4a.<br />

The nitrogen and. fiber l-evels decreased fron<br />

B+S+l{ to whole wheat and to flour (Tabl e 32) . B+S+1,,Í contained<br />

much higher leve1s of ARG, HfS, LyS, AiA, ASp and GLy than<br />

flour while those of THA., VAL, SER and TyR were slightly<br />

1r¡.69 - r.-.36 = o,32. ?tz .zL, - L5.36 = 2.32.<br />

3 (o.zl | 2.3Ð x too = t3.Lt¿.<br />

AR


TAlltE 32 Proximate, acÍd and neu.tral-detergent fiber ancl chrorìic oxicle analysesl<br />

for diets'of study d.<br />

DTI¡TS I,JI{OLB TIHEAT<br />

LEI¡EL 0F AtPHAFtoc (ø)<br />

Jr:luå (,¿)<br />

NÍtrogen.<br />

Ether extract,<br />

Fiber:<br />

lrude<br />

Ac id-det ergent<br />

lleutral -det ergent<br />

Ash<br />

Chromic oxide<br />

2'4e<br />

r.66<br />

2.3 5<br />

5.38<br />

12,L7<br />

4.82<br />

o.5z<br />

f,xpressed on a dry weight basis.<br />

FLOLIR<br />

2.35<br />

r.03<br />

n rÃ<br />

3.2r<br />

3.43<br />

4.01<br />

o.56<br />

!r-S+Ì,i<br />

2.7 5<br />

4.48<br />

8.trg<br />

12.94<br />

40.98<br />

8.44<br />

o.55<br />

PROTBÌN-FRII]]<br />

510<br />

0.09 0.10<br />

1.06 1.16<br />

3 .86 6.80<br />

6.t z 9.9o<br />

3.26 3.os<br />

o.59 0.55<br />

L5<br />

0.11<br />

1.00<br />

10.83<br />

L4.6t+<br />

3.r5<br />

o.55<br />

\o<br />

\o


higher. fhe levels of PliI , GiU and pRO were nuch lor,ver<br />

in E;S+i-., than in flour. As expected , the arnino acici<br />

'I evel-s of whole whreat '¡ere be-r,vreen those of E+S+i_ and<br />

rroì.Ìr ( _LaC,J_e )J ) .<br />

Statistical_ anall.,ses could not be perforned,<br />

et leest not in the forn of a single cross_over desj-gn on<br />

t,he apparent amino acid a¡¡ailebilities .fi-c:r r¡rhole wheat,<br />

flour and Ë+S+Ì,i (Table 34). pigs nurnbered 1, 2, 4 and.7<br />

re.íused to consuÌne the E+S+i: diet (Fi.g. I ). Ðata obtained<br />

fron repì.acerirent, pig nunber ó (ciay 23-29) are included in<br />

the avai-labilities of ani-no acids fron Ë+S+iÍ.<br />

Generall;', apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />

availabilities decreased frorn flour to whol_e r¡¡heat to<br />

B+S+l!Í. Total nitrogen and dr:. ¡rttu" digestibilities<br />

followed the sene pattein (Table 34).<br />

ihe differences in percentage unit,s beiv¡een il_eal_<br />

anci iaecal availab ili-i,ie s were the snallest for flour and<br />

t'he largest for diet E+s+r'.i. lhe differences for arr- d.iets<br />

vrere alrva1's the nost pronounced for AF,G, älS, TI{R, Gi,y, FitC,<br />

and StrR (la¡re 14).<br />

L).sine and ?h-Lì, r,,¡ere about equall;r the least<br />

available essential anino aci,ds of whole wheat and fLour<br />

when de'r,ernined at the end of the ileun. Lysine was the<br />

least availabie f:"on these 2 diets when deternined by the<br />

100


TAEIE 33 Amj-no acid coinposition of diets from study d.<br />

ÐIETS tr.,IHOLE I.!'HãAT<br />

ßL c/r68v2<br />

AI.:ÏTIC ACIÐS<br />

'¡cêsh+ j _TFG^l<br />

dlù<br />

rlE<br />

L¡u<br />

l.¿î,<br />

PJiE<br />

iri¡.<br />

'yAt<br />

itl on- ls s ent ial<br />

ÀiA<br />

,\ cÐ<br />

GI,i]<br />

GIY<br />

PRO<br />

c¡Þ<br />

T:-.-i,<br />

o.66<br />

o.3z<br />

o .5L<br />

1.01<br />

w.) I<br />

o.73<br />

0.40<br />

0.50 3 ,25<br />

o.7 6 4.9L<br />

L.69 30.5c,<br />

0.60 3 ,92<br />

r.u9 9.69<br />

0.60 3.92<br />

c.34 2.L9<br />

4.27 O.47<br />

2.O7 0.29<br />

3.52 O,55<br />

6.57 1.oo<br />

., )Y u . ¿,<br />

r.37 0.17<br />

4.72 O.76<br />

¿.)Y U.JC<br />

!+.3L 0. ó1<br />

I ExpresseC on a dry weight basis.<br />

2 Graris per 16 grains of nì-trogen.<br />

3 Ðetermined. by acid hydrolysis.<br />

FLOUR<br />

/" g/t6¿i;<br />

3.24<br />

¿.vr<br />

3.?t+<br />

!. (4<br />

r.1ó<br />

)..)<br />

2.44<br />

l. a^<br />

1.0i<br />

o.,rz<br />

4.55<br />

1.01<br />

o.59<br />

9.72<br />

u.oo<br />

a.+5<br />

u.4u ^ 2.','ô ã/<br />

o.7g<br />

^r.iâ4^ v.)t ).J) I.t,<br />

5.L9 35,57 3 .23<br />

v.+o ,t.¿> U.o¿!<br />

r.67 11.45 a.9i<br />

o.¡¿ 3.99 C.óó<br />

0.30 2.A5 O.34<br />

E+S+il<br />

I01<br />

s/t6st:<br />

o . .l_l-<br />

2.t+6<br />

3 .18<br />

ÃÕo<br />

I la<br />

r.45<br />

? !r1<br />

.


TABLE 3ò. Apperent llea1 and fâecal a¡nlno acld aveilebllftiesl<br />

of 'r,vho16 wheat, flour and B+S+li{ snd B+S+M_D for study ,}.<br />

I¡CATION<br />

AMINO ACÎDS (ø}<br />

Essentlal<br />

--¡rõ-<br />

Hts<br />

II,E<br />

LEU<br />

LIs<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAI,<br />

Non-Essêntle]'<br />

WHOLE WHEAT (6)2<br />

FAECES<br />

6z.t!L.7 9,+.6!0.j<br />

88.411,4 %.9!o.9<br />

89.112.o 91.6t1. o<br />

89.9Jr.i 9t.a!o,s<br />

79.5:?'] d6.rt1.2<br />

92.t+t2.2 93.[11.8<br />

9r.511.1 g4.t!o.7<br />

78.¡t2,5 89.110.9<br />

86.ztL.T g]-.rí.r<br />

_ffif--<br />

79.6t2.6 86.111.5<br />

ÂSP 8O.8*z. j 88. Ot¡..2<br />

GLU 95.6to.6 g7.gto.L<br />

GLr ?2.6t6.2 90.6f0.6<br />

PRo 79.LtLt+.2 96.8{.I<br />

sEn 86.VtA.5 gt+.'!o.g<br />

rIR 89.2!L.T 92.9!¡.2<br />

NrrRocEN (ø). 85.2tL.7 gt.1to.6<br />

DRr MATÎER (ø) 78,2*r.6 69,1*0.5<br />

¡- Mea¡s å.nd standard devlation. 2<br />

obseñrations par dietaty treatnent.<br />

ILEI'I.1<br />

rl,oun (6)<br />

FÀECES<br />

90.7!2.5 95.#rJ 8f.êr1.j<br />

Ð.9!o.t 96.6t1.r ?8.ita.6<br />

91.9!0.6 gt+.?!r,i 72.gt2.3<br />

9t+.6!o.5 95.5!L.4 7\.h4.o<br />

8U.2!L.6 86.0!,+.5 6ó.4È4.6<br />

9J.TtL3 93.t+t2.? 7?.8t3.8<br />

95.51L.L 96.3t1.1 ?6.ot2.5<br />

85.4t1.5 gzlt23 fi.gt6.j<br />

92.7ts.5 gt+J*r.6 7rJ!z.z<br />

86. ¡.to.9 90.Bta.B 70.2!o.?<br />

85.5xL.O 89.2f9,O 69.È!L.2<br />

97.gxO.L gÉ.610.[ 65.8t1.2<br />

78.5t7.¿ 93.6xL.8 57.?r8.9<br />

83.0114.? 98.5ts.n Zo,3tu.o<br />

91.210.4 95.Btt'J ?2.2!z.L<br />

%.L!o.? 94.411.4 7L.L4.o<br />

90.5h.8 95,6to.g 69.Btt.rr<br />

90.zto.,+ 9j.olo.8 LV j!2.7<br />

B+S+M (3)<br />

{unbèrs ln pqrenthesès- lndlcate the nuûber of<br />

, Detêrnlned by acid hydrolysls<br />

FA-ECES<br />

B+S+M-D (6)<br />

FAECES<br />

90,0*2.1 7L.5t6.7 90.2{.0<br />

88.8*2.5 n.6+3.r 88.011.5<br />

74.6!z,o 69.6!L.6 Z5.j!U.o<br />

78.2t2; ZL.7ty.7 Èo.7t2.g<br />

75.stt+,2 i?.l,i'.9 77.6t3.L<br />

8t.dtr.Z Z6. j!6.o n.z!7.6<br />

79.5!r.8 n.g!L} Bt.5!2.6<br />

7L3+.5 t+7 .84.9 Z,+.?*) .z<br />

T6.o!u.7 66.5!2.6 78.2!t.z<br />

75 .5t3.3<br />

75.6!2.8<br />

89.9io.9<br />

?è 3tL.5<br />

89.5+2.4<br />

83 .1f1.6<br />

78.Êt2.L<br />

8o.gta.7<br />

65 . otl.5<br />

60.7t5 .9<br />

6t+.213,3<br />

83.81r.6<br />

3L.gtz]..o<br />

-47.5+66,5<br />

67.7!2.8<br />

6Ê.5!2.6<br />

59.2t6.3<br />

69.ztr,L<br />

76.2!r+.O<br />

78 .zl;z .5<br />

90.911.4<br />

79 JÌ2.j<br />

78.,+t2,8<br />

8,+,2!2.?<br />

78.6t? .8<br />

83 . O*1.<br />

ü.9ro.3<br />

'+<br />

ts<br />

\)


faecal analysis method.<br />

The ileal availabilitíes of essential amino acíds<br />

fror¿ diet E+S+I{ were very low. They were 66.4 ana y.)iL for<br />

iïS and Täi. respectively. îhose of the other essential<br />

amino acids varied between ZI .j and St+.}î¿. Isoleucine,<br />

LïS, THR and VAL were about equa11¡' the Least available<br />

from diet B+s+ì'{ r¡rhen deternined by the faecal anaLysis ¡:rethod<br />

103'<br />

and their avaiLabÍlj.ties ranged fro¡n 7l .3 to 76.96 (Table 34).<br />

The apparent ileal availabilities of ARG, GIy and<br />

PRO were markedly lower for the cornstarch dituteC Ë+S+i..i diet<br />

(f+S+i.t-O) rhan fo:. the E+S+ir.{ diet. The ileal availability<br />

of PRO fron E+S+¡.I-D was even found to be negative i.e. more<br />

PRO leaves the end of the ileun: than is ingested. The ileal<br />

availabilities of the other amino aci.ds were also rower for<br />

E+S+].i-Ð than for E+S+Ì.Í but to a lesser extent. The apparent<br />

faecal arnino acid availabilities of Ë+S+ll end. E+S+li_D, vrj.th<br />

the exception of PRO and i,$T, were of the same order<br />

(Tabte 34).<br />

The individual apparent ileat and faecal amino<br />

acid availabllities, in addition to nitrogen and dry natter<br />

digestibilities and average daily dry natter intake of the<br />

pigs fed whole wheat, flour, diet E+S+i,j and diet E+S+1.:_D<br />

are shor/vn in the appendix (Table L9, ?Or ZI and, ZZ).<br />

The levels of the ileal and faecal anino acids,


total nitrogen and dr.r¡ natter increased e.s the level of<br />

alphafloc of the protein-free di3-,.s was increesed. The<br />

j-ncrer:ent i:r ar.ino åcid levels r.¡as r:uch larger v¡hen the<br />

leve1 of alphafloc was raised from 5 to lOÍj than fron<br />

Io Lo I5/, (Ta¡le 15).<br />

!'or al_l_ protein-free cìiet,s, lhere was a large<br />

disappearance of ARG, TIji,, GLy, pRO, SnR, total nitrogen<br />

and dr" natter bet¡¡¡een the end of the ir-eunl and the rectu¡rr.<br />

The net disapþearance was lerÍ:est for p?0, followed b ¡,, GLy.<br />

Proline and GLY in this order were arso the fir.st and second<br />

nost p::.oninent anino acids in iteal digesta. The levels of<br />

these a¡rino acids in i1eal digesta varied markecillr from<br />

pig to pig as shown by the relatively 1r"*u standard<br />

cieviations for these ariino acicis compared ¡o ihose of the<br />

other ailino ec j_ds (Tabl e 35) . Arginine v¡as -r,he aos-L pro_<br />

ninent essen'r,ial_ a¡nino acici in ilea1 die,osta.<br />

SnaLl but consisient, increases were founci for<br />

i:i, !:J, iTS,;.;T, illJ, T.ú anci ÀSp fro¡;l -.he end of the<br />

il-eum to the rectun (îable j5).<br />

0nl1' 4 of the ac-{,uaJ- ó test pigs consuneci the pF-iC<br />

diet (Fig. I ). 'jhe average nerabolic ileai enli í¿ecaj- a;.:i:t


TABLE 35. Metabolic ilea1 and<br />

in study l¡¿.<br />

LEVEL oF ATPHAFIoC (ø)<br />

LOCATTON<br />

AMTNO ACTDSz<br />

Ess ential<br />

--Ãñõ--<br />

HIS<br />

IT,E<br />

Ï,8I'<br />

LYS<br />

¡,8T3<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VÀL<br />

Non-EEsential<br />

--î:iÃ'-<br />

ASP<br />

. CYS3<br />

GLU<br />

OLY<br />

Pn0<br />

SER<br />

TTR<br />

NTTROGEN<br />

DNT MÁTTEN<br />

t"<br />

¿<br />

?<br />

rr,EüM (6)<br />

0.04919. s23<br />

o. or4fs.693<br />

0. o21to. OOI<br />

o . o39Io. ooz<br />

0.02lfg.693<br />

0. oo6to. oo1<br />

O. oz3ts. ss4<br />

o.OlPtq. s95<br />

o.031t6.6s4<br />

0.0411s. ss9<br />

o. 056to. oo9<br />

o.o¡ts.ss2<br />

0.07119.912<br />

o.139tO.Oó5<br />

o.t+7t+!O;2j<br />

o.03810. 006<br />

0.Ot3tg.s92<br />

0.20Jfs. s76<br />

IL.6l t6.95<br />

faecal amino acld levels<br />

FAECES (6) rrEUM (5)<br />

o. o22to. OO2<br />

o. o10to. ool<br />

o. oe7ts. e94<br />

0. o42to. OO5<br />

o. o36ts. ss3<br />

o.o12to.OO2<br />

o.o2óJo.oo3<br />

o.03oto. oo4<br />

O. O33to. oo,+<br />

o. o3$ts.6s5<br />

o. o61to. 006<br />

o. o10jo. ooL<br />

o. o68to. oo8<br />

0.03r+s.664<br />

0.02610. oo5<br />

0.0251s.692<br />

o.Orlfa. s94<br />

o.101tO. OOg<br />

6.48 !O33<br />

o.056Ès. s14<br />

0. oL7to. oo2<br />

o. o2lts. ssg<br />

0.05119.911<br />

o. 036Jo. oo8<br />

0.00810. oo3<br />

o. o3oJo. oo7<br />

o.051ts.6qg<br />

0.04316. s69<br />

o. 05óto. o1o<br />

o. o78to. or3<br />

o. o16to. oo3<br />

o.094ts.913<br />

0. r7rf6. s43<br />

o.57?to.2?2<br />

0, o&9t0. oo7<br />

0.015t0.004<br />

o.256tO.O52<br />

L7.69 tO.99<br />

Numbers in parentheses indlcate the number of observations.<br />

H:;Ï-il3o"li"tf,å*"1iåî?lå'fi¿rf;äåressed' as'erams per 100 grams of d,ry rnaæer inrake.<br />

10<br />

FAECES (5)<br />

o. ozPtg. s93<br />

0.O14tq.662<br />

o. o39to. 006<br />

0.05916.966<br />

o. or+8t0. oo7<br />

o.oyt6.g93<br />

o. 037ts. s95<br />

o. or+rto. oo7<br />

0.04919.967<br />

0.053Ès.9s6<br />

O.O8!¡t6.s13<br />

0. O1jts.6s2<br />

0.096fs.915<br />

o. o43ts. q66<br />

0.ol+6to.006<br />

o. o35ts. s64<br />

0. o16to. oo2<br />

0. 139*0. 019<br />

Lo.JJ x6.44<br />

%<br />

rrEuM (3)<br />

0.06110.012<br />

o. o22to. OO7<br />

o.Ollts. sg5<br />

o.05719. g1g<br />

o. O39ts. s11<br />

I5<br />

TAECES (3)<br />

o.o33ts.s64<br />

o. o15to. OOL<br />

0. o45ts. s93<br />

o. o67to. OOr¡<br />

o.o54ts.s65<br />

o.o33tg.6s6 o.o4,oto.oo3<br />

0.059+0.o1r+ o.orÌ5to.oo5<br />

0.04436.s1s 0.05319.9s5<br />

o.o5$1e.e66 o.o59ts.ss7<br />

o.o8r1o.ot2 o.o96to.oto<br />

o. rooto. ot 9<br />

0.16!ts. s15<br />

0.58510.161<br />

o.05316.916<br />

o. or6to. oo5<br />

9.27L+o.o3r+<br />

?6.32 x0.g5<br />

o. Lo81o. oro<br />

0.o47t9.995<br />

o. ol8ts. ss4<br />

O.O37tg.gg2<br />

o. o18to. oor+<br />

0.161t0. OrO<br />

L4.7àtO.99<br />

o


Generallir, there were no suLstenriat diÍferences due -u o ,lci;.<br />

weight on the neiabolic iiear and faecal_ a::ino aciC l_ev:ls.<br />

The ievei-s of ij-eal ÀF,.C, pR,C and. GLy varled sl:_ghl1r; iriore<br />

than tiie levels of the other anino acids (Appendix, Tabte 24).<br />

a-rg 9:'- nu*tioers -..*L^--- 3 and 5 lrere the only ones of the ó<br />

test' pigs that consu¡¡red ihe pF-li dÍet (lig. 3¡. The average<br />

netabolic ileal and faecal a:tìino ecici l_evel_s obtai-neC f:on<br />

replacenent pig nirïbe r 6 are inclucied in ciata fcr diei pF_L5<br />

in Tab1e 35. ?ig nu,nber ó gaineci about I j kg. fron tl:e firs-.<br />

ti¡:e (dal¡ 12-18 ) to the seconci tine (day 3t+_UO) it was feci<br />

106<br />

the PF-I5 diet (Fj-e. 3). Âlthough ihere were so¡ae di_fÍer.ences<br />

in ileal and faecal amino acid revels betvreen the 2 corrections,<br />

they were of a relativell¡ snêll nagnitude (.ê.ppendixr. îable 25).<br />

the individual neNabolic i-Ieal and feecal a:iino acid<br />

levels , in adC.i--r"ion to nítrogen antj. dry natter (as grans per<br />

1C0 gra,ts o-f Cr1- matter Íntake ) ancÌ daili, cÌr]r n¿¡¿u" intake<br />

are shown in the aopenciix (?able 23 , ZL and 25 ) .<br />

Stuciv Lb.<br />

sixty percent oí Lhe part,icres of the crackeci l^¡heat<br />

did not pass thi.ough a 2.CO riüt sieve, gOi, dici not pass<br />

ihrough a 1.0C arÍl screen (Table 3ó). The particle size<br />

dist,ributlon was derernineci after tìie cracked rvheat cliet<br />

was peJ-leted. .4. 250 gran sarnple was -uaÌ;en, steaaed througìr<br />

t'horoughly untir disintegration occurred., dried ancÌ sieved.


ÎABLE 36. Particle size distribution of finely ground and<br />

eracked r.rheat and of the Íleal digestá derived<br />

thereof.<br />

PRE.PROCESSTNG FTNEIT GROUND<br />

PARTTCI,,E<br />

DTSTRTBUTIOñ ølJ<br />

>2.00<br />

1.00 to 2.00 n¡r<br />

0.50 to I.OO nn<br />

0.25 to 0.50 nn<br />

0.L25 to O;25 nm<br />


There were no significant dlfferences betv;een the<br />

apparent faecal anino acid availabilities, total ni-trogen<br />

and dry metter digestibilities fron finer-y ground and cracked<br />

'¡¡heat (Table 32; Appendix, Table 26). l,iith the excepiion<br />

of Ì'ET, GLU, SE^Þ. and PRO, the apparent ileal availabilities<br />

of ar¿ino acids ruere significantly higher .for ground than<br />

for cracked wheat. The ilea1 availabilities of tïS of<br />

ground anci cracked wheat were 81 .5 and 72.6/, respectively.<br />

'v/ith the exception of iiIS, THR, ASp, cliJ, CLy,<br />

108<br />

and PRO, iì-ea1 amino acid availabilities were not significantll/<br />

different from faecal availabilities for ground. wheat. The<br />

ireal amino acid avairabiriti-es from cracked wheat were arr<br />

significantly lower than their faecal availabilities<br />

(Table 37 ) .<br />

The individual apparent 1leal and faecal ar¿ino acid<br />

avaiLabilities, in addition to nitrogen and. dry rîatter<br />

d i6e sti-bilitie s and average daily dry aatter intake fronr the<br />

pi.gs feC cracl


TABIE 37. Apparent ilea1 and faecal anlno acid<br />

availabllities of ground ana craòlcãã<br />

r'rheat for study l¡b .<br />

DIET GROTND WHEAT CSACKED IfITEAT<br />

IOTATION FAECES<br />

ai¡tti2AclÐs<br />

Essential<br />

- ÃñE-<br />

Hrs<br />

ÏTE<br />

lEu<br />

tÏs<br />

TtrT3<br />

PIIE<br />

TIIR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

AÏ,4<br />

Àsp<br />

GLI¡<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÌ?<br />

NITBOGEN (ø)<br />

DRT MATTEB (ø)<br />

L<br />

2<br />

92.04 9r).4Â<br />

91.18 94.ÀA<br />

9o.zà gL.2L<br />

gL.sA g2.g^<br />

81.54 85 3A<br />

8d.oAB Bd.9À<br />

92.* %.5A<br />

8j.78 BB.7A<br />

d8.64 91.34<br />

82.La 8?.14<br />

82.88 B?.14<br />

gS jB g?.àL<br />

i]-.zB 9o.rA<br />

Él*.¡B 91¡.gA<br />

gB.2AB %JA<br />

89,84 9o.7A<br />

88.48 %.LL<br />

É0.4n 88.84<br />

Standard error of the nean.<br />

86.5c<br />

È5.?c<br />

85.68<br />

È?.68<br />

?2.68<br />

63.68<br />

89.48<br />

78. Oc<br />

83. r.B<br />

7\.58<br />

77 Jc<br />

94.18<br />

74.Lc<br />

83.88<br />

è4.?B<br />

85':B<br />

âtr.zc<br />

76!8c<br />

a-1<br />

¡Jx<br />

109<br />

%.94 o.6L5<br />

%.94 o.i57<br />

89.94 o.zz5<br />

gl.LA o. :>St<br />

d3.84 1.842<br />

89.óA L.zLg<br />

92.94 o.t+25<br />

87 JÃ 1.05,+<br />

go.jA 0,782<br />

86.5L r.5r5<br />

8ó.24 1.045<br />

gz.6A 0.53L<br />

89.84 o.g7g<br />

96JL t.6t+t+<br />

goJ[ L.L56<br />

90.6Ã 0.609<br />

92åà o.uzz<br />

88.84 o.4oo<br />

Means -in the same row wlth the san¡e superscript do not differ<br />

significantly (P


STiTnr¡ t<br />

ÐTSCUSSTC}JI<br />

The experinent on the cannulated pi_gs (study 2a) was<br />

carried out during the spring and sun¡:e r oî A9?L. ihe experi_<br />

nent on the normal pigs (study 2b) was carried out during the<br />

sunmer and fall of LgTl+.<br />

CannulatÍon did not seem to affect the apparent faecal<br />

anino acfd availabilities of pigs fed barle1,, corn or wheat. <strong>fn</strong><br />

general , the apparent availebilities tended to be slightly higher<br />

for the cannulated than for the nornal pigs (Table lg). The<br />

largest differences were found for the a'lino aciid availabilities<br />

from barley.<br />

ln addition to the insignificant effect of cannul_ation<br />

on apparent faecar a¡äino acid. availabiriti.e s , the results obtained<br />

show the reproducibility of the faecal analysis method.<br />

Faecal collections from the cannulated pigs fed the<br />

l"i-7 diet following the cereal test diet sequence were lost.<br />

The iI-14 diet was only fed to the cannulated pigs following the<br />

cereaL test diet sequence. Consequently, a conparíson between<br />

the metabolic faecal anino acid excretion between the cannur-ated<br />

and normal pigs coulci on11' ¡" n:ade for ì;-Z fed prior to the<br />

cereal test diet sequence and for I-r4 fed foll0wing the cerear.<br />

test diet secuence.<br />

lThe studies are<br />

studi¡ 2r stud;' 4, study discussed in the followj.ng secuence:<br />

3 aad study 1,<br />

1l_c


TABLE 38. Comparisons<br />

-9f appgy,eqt faecaL amino acfd<br />

dry<br />

availabilitles,<br />

narrer.<br />

nitrogen and<br />

digesribiliries berween cannurareã-ãñ¿ ñormai'pü;-iãã- -<br />

corn, wheat and barley.<br />

CEREAL CRATN<br />

AMrNo ACIDS (ø)<br />

EssentÍa1<br />

ARG<br />

HTS<br />

IÏE<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NrTnocEN (ø)<br />

DAT MATTEB (ø)<br />

2a<br />

92.2<br />

93.6<br />

88.1<br />

93.8<br />

83.0<br />

9L.3<br />

86.3<br />

88.2<br />

90.8<br />

86.6<br />

9b.L<br />

86.2<br />

93. t+<br />

91. O<br />

90.2<br />

89.1+<br />

89.4<br />

CORN<br />

9L.2<br />

92.b<br />

87.8<br />

93.6<br />

8r..8<br />

9L.2<br />

85.9<br />

87.7<br />

90.2<br />

86.0<br />

93.8<br />

86.o<br />

93,t+<br />

90.6<br />

90.0<br />

88.5<br />

69.0<br />

¿1<br />

1.0<br />

1.2<br />

0.3<br />

o.2<br />

1.2<br />

0.1<br />

0. tÞ<br />

o.5<br />

0.6<br />

o.6<br />

o.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

0. r+<br />

o.2<br />

0.9<br />

o. Il<br />

VIHEAT<br />

92.7 92.L gtr.9 9À.r<br />

89.À 88.9<br />

9L.5 9L.2<br />

80.7 ?9.9<br />

92.5 92.6<br />

86,7 86. r<br />

88.9 88.6<br />

8l*.0 â3.3<br />

63.1 82.6<br />

97.o 97.0<br />

89.3 88.9<br />

96.7 9T.o<br />

92,5 92.L<br />

89.5 È9.5<br />

9L.2 9r.1<br />

69.0 68.,<br />

colu¡nns 4l B an4 C lndicate the difference in percentage units between the faecal<br />

anino acid avaiLabil-ities from cannulared ana äon-cãnffii.Ëd pie"-iõ"-"ã"i,-iñà"t<br />

and barley respectiveLy. .<br />

sl<br />

0.6<br />

o.8<br />

0,5<br />

0.3<br />

0.8<br />

-0.1<br />

0.6<br />

0.3<br />

o.7<br />

o,5<br />

o.o<br />

0.l}<br />

-0.3<br />

0.I<br />

0.o<br />

o.t<br />

o.5<br />

BARLEY<br />

cL<br />

89.b 87.t+ z.o<br />

9L.9 8?.ê tÌ.t<br />

83.1 ?9.5 3.6<br />

86.6 8+.r 2.5<br />

77.5 73.5 ,l¡.0<br />

87.9 86.2 L.?<br />

81.r+ ?8.3 3.L<br />

8t+.3 8L.1 3.2<br />

77,4 7t+.8 2.6<br />

77.9 7t+.6 3.3<br />

92.7 9r. l} ]..3<br />

82,6 79.8 2.8<br />

92.3 9r.r L.2<br />

86.9 8r+.3 2.6<br />

85.0 82.5 2.5<br />

8j.9 82.o 3.9<br />

83.6 81.8 r.8<br />

H<br />

P<br />

ts


There seeäred -,o be substantial d.i.fferences betl./een<br />

r-he xnetabolic faecal_ aniino acid excretion f:.on nornal_ anci<br />

cannulatecÌ piSs (Table 19). -{ closer look at the indiviCuat<br />

data obt,ained si:olved iliat the ¡:etabolic .faecal a¡rino acid<br />

excretions fron pig nunber l- fed eit,he r ì.:_7 or i.._lL .r¿¡ere<br />

considerabL;r higher than ihose obtained Íron the othe:. pi¿_s<br />

(ilppendix, Tab]e lO). This cig was alwa;is ve¡l¡ pronê to<br />

blockage v¡hich resul_ted in a re"y Iow dietar¡r intake<br />

(.'tppendÍx, Table 9 ) of the ì.-? and ì--I+ diets and in er(cessive<br />

lcakage at tines. Proper dieta:,¡. eauilibr"ation wit,h respect<br />

to the r:aintenance diets had probably not taken pJ_ace ai<br />

t,he t'i¡i:e the faeces v,,ere cc't l-ec-ueC. Tn other lrc:.Cs, the<br />

íaeces that '¡¡ere collecteci na;, have ccn,r,ained undJ-ge sted<br />

residues of the pig gl'ower ration that uas fed pr.ior io -r,he<br />

feeding of the ì.;-7 and i--ld diets. ùIoser agreenenr- betr,yeen<br />

ihe netabolic faecal ar:ino acid excietion fro;r nornal anC<br />

cannulated pigs vrere obiained v¡hen the daia fron pig nunber<br />

I were e:


113<br />

TABLE 39. Conparisons of the.,metabolic faecal anino acid and<br />

nitrogen excretionl between study 2a .nã-Z¡.-- -<br />

LEWL OF<br />

ArPEArr,oc (ø)<br />

A¡ÍINO ACIDS<br />

EssentÍa1<br />

-Tm'-<br />

HTS<br />

TLE<br />

T,EiT<br />

f,TS.<br />

METJ<br />

PEE<br />

THR<br />

VAI<br />

ASP<br />

GLI'<br />

GLÏ<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

I{ITROGEN<br />

.o29<br />

.oar<br />

.o33<br />

.or0<br />

.o+e<br />

.016<br />

.031<br />

.03l+<br />

.038<br />

2a<br />

.o24<br />

.010<br />

.030<br />

.o43<br />

.o4o<br />

.014<br />

.o27<br />

. o3o<br />

.O3l+<br />

.046 (.041)<br />

.o72 (.o6L)<br />

.095 (.086)<br />

.038 (.033)<br />

.039 (.033)<br />

.o37 (.O3Ll<br />

.o23 (,0201<br />

.022<br />

.008<br />

.o27<br />

.o33 'oltt<br />

.012<br />

.o25<br />

.o29<br />

.o32<br />

.0lro<br />

.062<br />

.080<br />

.o32<br />

.a3z<br />

.03l+<br />

.o19<br />

.032<br />

.015<br />

.044<br />

.068<br />

.o57<br />

.020<br />

.041<br />

.ou7<br />

.051<br />

2a<br />

.030)<br />

.01rù)<br />

.o39)<br />

.o57)<br />

.0119 )<br />

.017)<br />

.034 )<br />

.0r+0)<br />

.044)<br />

.063 (.05r+)<br />

.o9r¡ (.083)<br />

.125 (.111)<br />

.05o (.or$2)<br />

.oó7 (.058)<br />

.050 ( .0r+5 )<br />

.o3o (.025t<br />

14<br />

2 .oz6<br />

.012<br />

.038<br />

.054<br />

.0t1,<br />

.o20<br />

.031<br />

.038<br />

'ol+5<br />

.o53<br />

.088<br />

.LLz<br />

.ot+o<br />

.040<br />

.0l}4<br />

.o23<br />

.L44 (.r29) .118 .t93 (.L67) .L75<br />

I E*p"""""d. as grams per 100 gran dry nåtter intake.<br />

2 val,r"" in parentheses exclude d.ata obtained from pig nurber 1.<br />

3 Determined by acÍd hydrolysis.


should be taken into account during the formulation of<br />

die*.,ary arnino acid leveLs in order to neet the requirements<br />

for optirnun Ì"esponse.<br />

The apparent availabilities of LïS especially<br />

and those of THR, ÌET and TRy of cereal grains are of<br />

practical impor-r,ance. .4s was mentj_oned previouslT, the<br />

nethod used for TRy analysis did. not yield accurate<br />

dupJ-ications.<br />

0n1y sraall differences were found between the<br />

apparent ileal and faecal anino acid availabiliiies for iïS<br />

and i'¡Eî from eoi'n, wheat and barleir ( Tab1e 40 ) . f,he dif_<br />

ference betlveen ileal and. faecal iiS availabilities were<br />

1.0, 4.0 and t+.21i for corn, wheat and barley respectively.<br />

Ïn the same order, these d.ifferences were 2.1¡, 2.3 and O.5i.!<br />

for lET.<br />

¡rl1- f^^^^'<br />

,,..o "aecaL analysis nethod night overestinxete the<br />

actual availabili-r,y of TIJR. The difference between iLeal<br />

and faecal THi, availabilities l,¡ere 7 ,Lt, LO.2 and 10.2!å for<br />

corn, wheat and barley respectively. overestimation of TFiR<br />

by the faeca] analysis r¡rethod v¡ould occur if Tlin were sub_<br />

jected to nicrobial_ fermentation by the flora in the large<br />

i,ntestine .<br />

the differences bê-r,ween apparen-r, faecal and ileal<br />

amino acid availabilities of the other essentiar- a¡cino acicÌs<br />

114


TABLE<br />

'+0.<br />

ApparÊnt rleal and faecal aÍ¡ino acid avarr.abir-ltr es, in additron to nrtrogen,<br />

d¡v na*e., srarch and crude riber ar!.ãliuurtrãs årã'-tlrã-ãi3ãipËã"äiå" or<br />

these substances Ín the targe <strong>fn</strong>testiñã. ----<br />

Essentla].<br />

-Eq- 87.1 s?.2<br />

!I! 88.3 e3.6<br />

rLE 8T.S ¿ìB.l<br />

IEll 92,5 93.8<br />

LIl" 82.0 83.0<br />

I.4ET,/ 01 o 49 .5<br />

PHE 90.í òr.r<br />

ry 78.9 86.3<br />

vAL 8,r.9 g8.z<br />

Non-Essentlel<br />

-TrÃ-_---_ 88.5 90.8<br />

ASP, $.9 ¡}6.6<br />

qx , 82.L 9O.2<br />

8lV 7I:2 Zt:L<br />

PRo 8o,r+ sER 9j.L eu.9<br />

TfR<br />

ii.o<br />

89.O 9O.2<br />

¡¡1noqp¡'r tØ1.. 92." 8e.4<br />

lRT MArTqB, (ø) 8o.2 ¿S.rr<br />

qT4lqH (ø)& .,.< e8.2 s9.9<br />

CRUDE FTBEn |y'"|, L.2 ii.i<br />

2<br />

3<br />

5<br />

CEREAL CRAIN<br />

LOCÂTTON<br />

rLEUM FÂEcEs ¿.t.1 62<br />

37.5<br />

l+6,7<br />

6.6<br />

L7.2<br />

4.9<br />

-29,L<br />

6.L<br />

35 .r<br />

2L.7<br />

-4.8 85,8<br />

-5.3 89.!.<br />

-o.6 85,3<br />

-L,3 86.9<br />

-1.O 75.7<br />

+2.4 8ó.6<br />

-0.8 88.8<br />

-7.t+ 76,5<br />

-3.3 82.8<br />

I'IHEÂT<br />

rtEUM FAEcEs ¡,.r,1 A,<br />

*,i ;íti 7t!.2 -1r.0 B6.d fa,i Ai,i 96.? iL.9<br />

ts,ç<br />

,,\.ç -6.r g¡,.r gz.b tj:i _6:i =e:ó<br />

e.3 -L.z B5.e eg.i Li.6 _t.¿<br />

2?.\ -7.o 82.9 9r.2 4d.3 _8.3<br />

\9.2 -?.? 7i.3 de.Q id.á -ti.í<br />

II,EUM FÂECES [.I.1 A 2<br />

"î:8 i3:ï ti:i :u,:'n<br />

89.4 26.2 -l,r 7'<br />

9L.5 gl*Z 35,4 -t,.6 6: n:, :r,:i<br />

cg.z zo.s -4.o 22.? 27.2 ti:i _L.z<br />

9C.? 17.4 -2.3 C9.! 7i.e *ö.¡<br />

2?.2 33.3 -3.T g?.? qi.i =i.i tl.á _\.2<br />

å3:l \t:2 -13:í ià:3 ål:l *:Z -!Z:i<br />

73:', -;à:3 '3:å ZZ.2 27:L -;t:Z<br />

Digestlbttlties in thè ¡.arge intestine<br />

Differ€nces Differences ln percentaje ncr"centqc¡ inits úñt+e between hÂ+-, ^ faecal and irear estlî¡ates.<br />

Deteflnined by the oxidatlon<br />

.nethod. 4<br />

dlgesta fron<br />

For the deterrnlnation<br />

rhe 2 pigs' fed<br />

of starch<br />

the<br />

dlgestibillties<br />

iáme aièã- aüi:irË-åã'"il'particular tesr period, -iõõi"a.<br />

were poo<br />

"ê<br />

I::,tlî-9"t,:,:T:n::1g1"of crude flber disesriblri;fes disesta fron 6 piss rea th" test dlet, v¡ere pooLed.<br />

".r"<br />

.¿tl<br />

g?.7 77.\ 25.3 _7.?<br />

'!!.V 7Z.e 23.0 _6.i<br />

77.9 ie.z +s.e<br />

99.9 22.7. bj.e -u.i _6.r<br />

7\'? 9?.9 jQ.o -n.[<br />

+sti ',Êtâ 'titt, tll:l<br />

7\.9 85.9 ,+3.7 _11.0<br />

a?'â frf iï,i .i,'i<br />

F<br />

P


varied from O.87c for PHx to 5,3ii for äIS from corn, fron<br />

3.li,i, for Pi{it to 6.Víà for ARG from wheat and from /¡.0f5 for<br />

fLE to ]",L5,4' for HrS fro¡: barley.<br />

116<br />

Generally, there lJas an i-ncreased net disappearance<br />

of amino acids in the large intestine fron corn to v¡heat to<br />

barley. Total nitrogen, drl' matter anci starch but not crude<br />

fiber follo¡¡ed the sa¡ne relationship (Tab1e 40).<br />

For all the cereal grains tested., certain anino<br />

acids alvrays disappeared to the targest extent. These a¡nino<br />

acids were AB,G, HïS, THR, CTS, GLU, GLy, pRO and SEñ, (Table<br />

40). The net disappearance of nost of these amino acids was<br />

also extensive in the large intestine of the pigs r.,,hen these<br />

wei'e fed the maintenance or piotein-free dj_ets (Table 2t+ and.<br />

35), lïowever, these observations do not necessaril]r mean<br />

that the micro-organisms of the large intestine are mainlr,<br />

active on the netabolic amino acids present in di¿esta frcn<br />

pigs fed cereal grains. These observati-ons coulci sin:p}l/ nean<br />

that the flora has a particular affinity for the degradation<br />

of particular amino acids. 0n the other hand, a type of flora<br />

ma¡'.have established itself in the large intestíne of the<br />

pig with a dependence on endogeneous substrates. Endogeneous<br />

substrates are a consistent and fairly constant source of<br />

potentiar nutrients for ihe flora throughout the life span of


A l_imited amount of comparative data are available<br />

and are shown in labIe 41 . The ileal availability estimates<br />

of amino acids obtained by Easter (L973) fro¡e corn were nuch<br />

T17<br />

lower than those obtained i-n this study. Faecal avairab ities<br />

were al_so lower but to a lesser extent. The cotlection pro_<br />

cedure employed by Easter was different than ihat used in this<br />

study. <strong>fn</strong> Easterrs study, ileal digesta r4ras collected for<br />

each minute of a 24 hour day over a 5 day period. Fifteen<br />

eouall5r spaced coll-ections of 96 minutes durati.on were obtained.<br />

lhe collection procedure used ciid not pernit the deterroination<br />

of iteal amino acid avaítabilities on the basis of total aníno<br />

acid intake, ånd tota] anounts of amino acids passing through<br />

the end of the ileunr. Easterrs estj.mates are based only on<br />

the rel-ative chrornic oxide content of feed. and digesta and give<br />

no indication of 'r,he total amount of chroni.c oxide recoveï'ed<br />

from ileal digesta. The experiments carried out in this stud.y<br />

allowed for the deternination of ireal amino acid avairabiÌities<br />

by both total collection anci chronic oxid.e revers. Ðei:er¡ninations<br />

b1' both meùhods were found to give nearly sirnirar Ílear ava -<br />

ability estimates for the cereal grains, indi.cating total<br />

recoverl¡ of chromíc oxide fro¡:r i1eaI digesta (Table 23).<br />

Easter did not return any of the i1eal d!.gesta that<br />

was coLlected from the ilear cannura back into the aninar vÍa


TABLE<br />

CEREAL GRATN<br />

LOCATTON<br />

TìEFERENCE<br />

'+1. Comparison of apparent ilea1 -and faecal amlno acid availabilities from<br />

corn and barLey as obtained from dlfferent-rã¡ðratories.<br />

AMrNo ACIDS (%)<br />

Essential<br />

ARG<br />

Hrs<br />

TT,E<br />

LEU<br />

LÏS<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Bss entlal<br />

---ÃTT--_-<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÏR<br />

rI,EUI,Í<br />

A1<br />

73.O<br />

77.1¡<br />

68.4<br />

76.8<br />

6tr.t<br />

73.8<br />

73.2<br />

61.r<br />

69.7<br />

FAECES<br />

¡l<br />

ILEUM<br />

B2<br />

È7.t+ 88.o<br />

88.3 9o.7<br />

87.5 83.tù<br />

92.5 88.5<br />

82.0 81.2<br />

9L.9 9s.t<br />

90.5 85 .7<br />

78.9 80.8<br />

8tr.9 8j.3<br />

83.9 80.9<br />

91.8 90. t+<br />

7L.2 78.3<br />

8O.rÌ 9z.L<br />

Ê8. ¡ 83.8<br />

8t1,9 86.6<br />

89. o 86.7<br />

1 R"fu"un.e A indicates Easter (Lg?Ð.<br />

c<br />

Reference B indicates data from this study.<br />

3<br />

67.2<br />

4.6<br />

77.8<br />

50.1<br />

76.O<br />

7L.L<br />

76.5<br />

Reference C indicates Zdbrowska (L973 a, bl ,<br />

FAECES<br />

B2<br />

92.2<br />

93.6<br />

88.1<br />

93.8<br />

83.0<br />

89.5<br />

9t,3<br />

86.3<br />

86. 2<br />

90.8<br />

86.6<br />

9l+.L<br />

È6.2<br />

93.t+<br />

91.0<br />

90.2<br />

TI,EUM<br />

92<br />

81.5<br />

80.rr<br />

79.L<br />

8L.5<br />

73.3<br />

80.4<br />

82.2<br />

7L.2<br />

78. o<br />

69.7<br />

7L.2<br />

86.6<br />

7L.2<br />

80.9<br />

?6.3<br />

79.7<br />

BARIET<br />

II,EUM<br />

ç3<br />

82.O<br />

75.O<br />

77.O<br />

7È.O<br />

70.a<br />

80.0<br />

67.o<br />

75.O<br />

68.0<br />

75.0<br />

8l*. o<br />

80. o<br />

83. o<br />

72.O<br />

78.O<br />

H<br />

ts<br />

@.


th.e caecal- cannula. Fhil_l:pson (]-g52) Ín stuCies vrith sheec<br />

fcund that ihe e.r:ount of i.uccenal .digest: rêturnêd tc -,he<br />

ì: si:'l ^1-ì.r.ì = ,¡-:. = ¡n-rq: i¡. ¡,^:<br />

_c.-.¡!u_L-: :.¿u u. vv_.r-<br />

=rr<br />

uC.- O:ì ti.ê f:cv¡ cj<br />

i j-:e ste Ír-cr the prorriilel cennufå. ,,hen nc di-ge sta. ,,ra s<br />

l e turned withln er,ren oÌle hour, tce fiow rate ,,¡/e s inci.eeseC<br />

bl. 7C',''. .i:: i::::-ees= :n iioi.; r:.¡e a'ccv: the :lcri:ef -lìow rate<br />

et the e n,l cf the ileun (r.rhich ccurd ha.".e cccui.Ì.ei in ¡a s*.e:. I s<br />

studies ) :ra;' ¡¿i'. resul-teci in a decrease in protein ci3astl_<br />

'rilit;' a''d,far anino acid :bsci.ptlon ani ther:fcre l-cr.;e:, ifeaf<br />

:ri::o eci.i avail:.h:Iit:es.<br />

-rn gsneral , the ilea1 ar:.:ino acii ar,.ai1aÌ:ilitie s<br />

c'cteineC b;- I3'..rcirsk ¿ (L97) a , ': ) for barie;- coî.pêr3 r.e r;. yell<br />

lvi*,h thos: obtained j-n this study (ïabte 4t ) . Tj-_ e data obtalne


L2A<br />

TABLE 42. The disappearancelof arnino a<br />

starch aåd. crude fiber in .¡!ilã¡r3.lliå5ii"3ï narter,<br />

CEREAL GRATN CORTV .I,I¡I{EAT<br />

AtrtrNO ACIDS<br />

Ess ential<br />

--rrõT-<br />

HIS<br />

ILE<br />

LEl'<br />

LÏS^<br />

MET¿<br />

PITE<br />

TFN<br />

VAT,<br />

effii*=de<br />

ASP,<br />

crs'<br />

olu<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TTR<br />

NITROGEIq<br />

DRÏ MATTER<br />

STARCH<br />

CAUDE FTBER<br />

1<br />

t<br />

.o2L<br />

.01À<br />

.003<br />

.oL7<br />

.003^<br />

+.oo6t<br />

.003<br />

.o27<br />

.ol-5<br />

9.<br />

1.<br />

1.<br />

018<br />

0L9<br />

016<br />

0tl3<br />

07l+<br />

L65<br />

03z<br />

004<br />

L36<br />

2<br />

10<br />

23<br />

.040<br />

.017<br />

.oL7<br />

.ol+5<br />

.018<br />

.005<br />

.025<br />

.040<br />

.034<br />

.049<br />

.053<br />

.oatt<br />

.191<br />

.088<br />

.L43<br />

.05¿l<br />

. o1t+<br />

.2L5<br />

L5.7<br />

4.L6<br />

o.57<br />

BARIET<br />

. 0à6<br />

.o25<br />

.016<br />

'ol+3<br />

.oL7^<br />

+.001J<br />

.o3L<br />

.o39<br />

.035<br />

.03?<br />

.02b<br />

'oua<br />

.180<br />

.084<br />

.138<br />

.053<br />

.019<br />

.21+l+<br />

L7.4<br />

5.01<br />

L.39<br />

Expressed as gra'ns per ro0 grans of dly natter Íntake.<br />

Dete:srined by the oridation method.<br />

Plus s5'gn indicates an increase Ín the quantrty of amÍno aci.ds<br />

fron the énd of the ileum to.tñ"-î"ãËã".


ia111. Cisalpeâranc.r in the ia:"¡= in*":stj.ne ci 1,he pa:.ticuiar.<br />

¡rrf¡ian;c<br />

.A,1though this obser.t ation could .le ccinciientaJ_,<br />

the inc:.ease iu st,aich i isappear.a,nce frcÌ,i cot n t o rrheet _1 c<br />

L:'r..'-r. !..r !çJ in _Li.r +l¡^ (.¿i- r¿,¡.:e I-'.-^ intestlne r.;a s Cirectf .¡ proporticnal tc<br />

toi:al niti.co"rl ai..pp"êi.ance it on these cereaf -qiains in th:<br />

_:.-¡_! I ::-r-c ri-!-_,ru4:r=. i he-d+i F^ 'j ;:.jroI,,s:s in the :"u:en tekes piace Lhi.cugh<br />

p=ptides c-f d¿creasing chain leng;th to f:.ee aninc aciCs.<br />

Ìhese free ailino ecj-iis are ÍinalLi, degradsd to ar:nonie end<br />

shcrt-chain fat-u;. ¿s1¿.. ?:,esunabJ_i,, this tl.pe c.f bacterial_<br />

h;.ârc1;-'sls elsc tâl.i3s place ín ihc câecur;1. ?l:e exteni. cf<br />

bacter-i al- hl.Crc1,.sis cí unCige si.eC e xc3ene ous and/c:. enCc_<br />

Ê'3necu_s pro-1.ein will iepenC cn the ancunt of cnerg;. th.et :s<br />

a.¡aila.ble to the nicr.oílcre, cí i-lhe larg: inte stine .<br />

llcr": undigestible star-ch fi,on barl_e¡. ct" Irhcât thê.n<br />

îi'on ccrn 3nters the large intesti,ne and is avai iai-.ie tc the<br />

nic:.oflcra (îabi.e 4C anci L2 ) . -ll. s e. ccnsec',tence , rel-at ir¡elj.<br />

nore bacieriaì- h¡.'drol;'sls cí undiSe sted prctsia v¡.i 11 .ùai:e pr_ace<br />

r.'h.¡ .,¡¡-r: L.þl !:ir_r" ^:¡ ^e ui ,,L^^+ ...,i.cac. rather ihar: corn, is îl: â:lc. â :elå:i7el,,<br />

]-arger proCuction cf anncnie and shcrt-cj:ain jait-¡ âciCs t¡ili<br />

re sult. -1. r:i.opoi"ticn of the annonia prcCuceC in -,he j-ar.3e in_<br />

te stlne lsill r:e abscrbed. ¡.s the anouni pi.oC:rcei increases,<br />

e.bScr¡ticn l"li I ] --^i¿' J_¡, aisO increa se . ,1.t the sane t i:le , rr,ith<br />

i"nci'ease in es::onla a'csorption, a picpcr.ti.cn cf the inci.ease ir<br />

qn:o:ì.1: p:c.j'_tc:J ',vi11 'ce :ss::ii-ateC -c;. tì..e ::lc:c_or-¡-¿;:isi:s.<br />

12i


The :.efc¡.:, c::e -,.rcuJ-C elsc izre3t :_-.c r. e ;l.i.c:.o'ciai_ prci:J-:: s¡-n_<br />

i?2<br />

tle sis in the Iarq_^ lnte sti-ne ¡¡ihen barr c., cr ',,.;l: e ¿ t is fed anC<br />

tlls s!^.culd b+ refl=ctad 'c'¡ :e lativel;, higher I:ve_s c.f J.¡. p.l. in<br />

the f aec=s fron bar1e.,' and vrh=at than frct corn. lio,¡rever,<br />

it should be ke¡t ín i::ind that ¿s the nccro-or¡:anisns norre<br />

Ccwn the lar.se intestine, nart cf tl"ese r,^ríl1 under,grc<br />

autslygls, presuneblJ¡ prcDorticnar to their nunbei , Annonia<br />

s:ens tc be the nejcr end p:.cduct cl Ce¡ir.aCaticn of :icrcbia.l<br />

prctein and is a.bscrbed (l_ichel , \966\. The le.,¡els of DAFÄ<br />

in the faeces r¡tere n'Ìee surec but the :'er.rccucibilit¡¡ of r.esults<br />

r¡¡a s pcor and thereÍcr.e did not r/úarrânt intercretation.<br />

!iqepcç:renc.e cl starch anC crucie<br />

rlceY' Ln tne let"F.e intêstine.<br />

-1. substant ie1 ânount of starch fr.c¡r r¡heat and barl_ev<br />

Cisapnear.ed in the larse intestine, nanel:, l+.L6 and 5.Ol<br />

grens respe ctivel¡.. (Ta¡te ¿Z). lhese val_ues correspcnd +.c<br />

5.? and 7.8Í of the tctar. cieter'¡ starch f.cn r,¡heat ani ,oarLe-,<br />

re spectivel: (Tal:1e 4C). Jor. ccrn, star.ch dig:sticn 1,^ra s<br />

neerl" complete b.'' the :nC of the snal_l intestine. lnlir l.l-9<br />

grans, co¡'respondins to l_ .71, of tlie total díetar.., intake .<br />

-<br />

díserpear.eC in the Large iniestine (:eble !,C and L2),<br />

!,olr:es et å1 , (L9?)) alsc founC starch dÍg:estion frcm ccrn tc<br />

be r:+arI'.' conpl:te 1..,' the _^nd of tl^.e snel_l i::t:st lne . I:: rf,is<br />

stud.; ccnilete dl.qesticn of sta:-ch rças fou_nd 'c-.- the faecai<br />

en¿l -¡sis ne-uhcC (la¡ie ¿C ) .


ff the ¡3r"rinin. cfql"^h cni---i¡c the Iars_. intestine<br />

r^jê s fei'nented Ín t!^e se:lc renne t- es in Ì.un€n ferr:entation.<br />

then l-31' of t¡ê +nerr:' '¿:o'.:1: ':: îîn\.?rt --d i::t: 'î:ct :t i=1 csll-<br />

ì:crìie s . 15i Ncr-lld 'ce lost as heat ¡'.nC ne thane an¿ 7 5:t .l¡culi fte<br />

abscr'red as vclatile fatt-.' a.ciCs. liolatíIe f:t-Ll- acids :re<br />

utilized wi'uh about 65í o-i the eíiicienc)¡ cf carbch,¡irates.<br />

The net j'ield to the ani_;lal_ of the energl¡ disappeering in<br />

the iar'ge in-te stine Ís then ê tu;"L of ¿rucose ec.ì.i ïâìents<br />

(iìctnes et ai. , 1973) . The ectuei âr.ou.nts oÍ en=rgi. icst îr.cn<br />

starch tc iìie ¿ninaL fro;: corn, wheet and barieir -wcuto then<br />

aaa<br />

'oe C.Ll', L.5C", end I.3C¿ gr::s per IOC gra;,-.s oî Crr- ;la*;ter<br />

int ake re spectivell¡.<br />

Po-uent iatl¡i, the flcra cf the large inte stine ne;,,<br />

plai,- e. role in naking unCi6:estible câ^rboh)¡ûrate ¡veii:bia tc<br />

the ani.nal as vola.tile íati;. aciis. The lâi,ter nâJ¡ be ci<br />

scne ì.mporiance to the enínal when wheat or oariei, is feC.<br />

The total a.Ícunt oí Cisappear¡nce ci crucÌe fiber<br />

frcn the cereei gr-ains in the ì_arge intesti.ne iid not foliow<br />

the seme rela'uicnship as that oí star.ch frcä corn, wheat ani<br />

L t -: < i't ^¡<br />

a- _ -<br />

- .i: /r^^\<br />

x.)/!.tul = C4,i.<br />

(me ) ìl=ee -- -'--i<br />

(6t' x5.cL) =I.90.<br />

(rcõ )<br />

'. )1<br />

(64 xr.lZ) =C.43;t".L(:-(5.t* xt,.Lê) =i.5C:


arley. i;heat and corn used. in this expei.irr-ient had approxi_<br />

mately the qane crude fiber content but relatively nore cru.de<br />

fiber disappeareC from corn in the large intestine than fronr<br />

wheat (Teble 40). Ðue to the relatively low anount o.f sterch<br />

r24<br />

fro¡n corn entering the large intesti.ne, the .flora mal/ have had<br />

to obtaín relatively nore energy from the crude fiber fraction.<br />

The distribution o.f particle size of the cereal grain<br />

diets and the ileal dìgesta derived fron the cereal grains are<br />

shown in Tab1e 43. the percentages of particles larger than<br />

1.00 mrr were 37.7, ?9.8 and 6t.9fl for the corn, wheat anci<br />

barley diets respectively. Tn the same order they were ì2.!,<br />

3 5 .t+ and, 27 .5i:; f or i1eal digesta from corn, r,;heat anC barley.<br />

The fractions larger than 1.00 mn were found to<br />

contain unriigested cracked grain particles and fíbrous nateriai.<br />

the higher percentages of 1arger pariicJ.es in i1eal d.igesta<br />

from v¡heat and barlel/ than from corn reflect the dietary par-<br />

ticre size distribution of these grains. Higher ileal anrino<br />

ac'id avaiLabilities and starch digestibilities na1, possibl_j¡<br />

have been obtained, fro¡r wheat and barley if these grains had<br />

been ground through a finer screen before they vrere rnade into<br />

pellets (page t*6 ) .)<br />

the inplications of the effect of size of grinding


TABT,E ,+3. the dlstribution of partícle size of the cereal grain diets .and of<br />

the íLeaL digesta deiived fron each diet.<br />

CEREAT., GRATN<br />

PARTICI.,E<br />

DISTRTBI'TTON<br />

)2.00 nn<br />

1.00 to 2.00 r¡m<br />

.50 tô 1.00 mn<br />

.25 to .50 nn<br />

.125 to .25 nn<br />

T<br />

2<br />


on i1eal amino acid availabilities were not realized prior<br />

to the sta:'t of this experi.nent and the effect of dietar;,<br />

particle size distribution v¡as reexarnined in raore detair in<br />

studt' 4b.<br />

A certain degree of fractionation of the ingested<br />

dletarl' conponents v¡ilI take place during stonrach enptyÍng.<br />

îhis in turn will determine the uniformity of flor,,¡ ancl<br />

conposition of digesta through the end of the ileu¡n. lhe<br />

anount of fractionation of digesta by the stonach will be<br />

influenced by the particle size distribu.tÍon of the diet. r¡<br />

these experi¡rents, particle size distribution rrra s largest for<br />

r26<br />

wheat and only minor differences in the amino acid conposition<br />

of ilea1 d.igesta f:"on .r,he individual B-hou:. collections v¡ere<br />

found (Îab1e 21 ). Therefore, it r^¡ou1d be safe to assune that<br />

the individual 8-hour corlections of i1ea1 digesta from corn<br />

and barley were also of a si¡ailar con:position,<br />

As was explained previously (pale 76 ), the rnetabolic<br />

ileal and faecal anrino acid leve1s in study 2 v{ere originalJ-y<br />

deter¡nined b¡r aid of the Ì,I-7 and l.Ì-14 diets. These diets<br />

contained 4É casein as the onl.v protein source.<br />

True faecal anrino acid availabilities frorn casein for<br />

ihe pig were found to be very close to IOO% (:egum , 1973). The


1 a,l<br />

avallabi.Iities cf the essentlel eriino aclCs, -,¡;1th the excepii-on<br />

oí lii of .¡hich t he availabi-iit¡.- was 95 . t*;, , rânged Erari 97 .g<br />

to 99.9i. Consecl,entl-¡r , ihe anino acicis in faeces coliecr.ed<br />

fro¡: oirs fed casein should Ì-.. e incii-cative of +.he ¡:etabolic<br />

faecal a:ino acil losses.<br />

Two na"intenance diet s v¡ere fcrrul:ted , nenìe1:' r,^,¡it h<br />

? and. L4Í alphafloc r.espectíve1_r'. Dietar¡r f iber level has<br />

been shown to affect tha ¡letabolic f¿ecal nitrcaen excretion<br />

in pigs and rats (I-.hn, fcSL; ite.r,.er, 1956; t,itchell , I95U;<br />

i'rhiting and Eezeau, 7957 a,b\. Therefore, it can be expected<br />

that díetar¡r fi'cer level- will also affect the netabolic<br />

faecal excretion oí the individual anino aci.cis.<br />

Ileal and feecal satrpl-es fror:: ì.-i fed to the cannulated<br />

pigs after ti^.e cereal test. diet sequence wer.e lost and the<br />

effect of body wêight on the netabolic il_eal and faecal anino<br />

acid levels could not be assesseci. Tl:e effect o.f rleigh-u<br />

on the netabolic faecal nitrogen anC anlno acirj l_evéls, when<br />

these were expressei es grens excreted per lCC grans of dr-lnatter<br />

intake, was fcund to be ver;; snell for the non-cannulated<br />

pigs in studj' 2b (iatte Zó). <strong>fn</strong> adciition, onl:¡ smal1 ciifferences<br />

due to weight of rats on the netabolic faecal_ enino âcid<br />

excretion were founci in st,uci.i. I (:eble 13 ) .<br />

ln the assunpticn that there ras no effect of weight on<br />

the netebolic ainino acid ani nitrogen Levels fcr the can-<br />

nulated pigs, raising the Cíetar;r alphaflcc level f:.on Z tc


1{f increased the r:retabolic ileal and faecal amino acÍd<br />

an


T¡,BLE ,+4. Leve1s of amino acids, total nitrogen and dry natter in il-ea1<br />

digesta and faeces fron the cannuLated pigs fed the rnaintenance dÍets.<br />

T,EVEL OF<br />

ATPHAFL0C (ø)<br />

AMINO ACTDS4<br />

Essential-<br />

--îrG-<br />

HTS<br />

TI,E<br />

I,EU<br />

LïSr<br />

MET.,<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAT.,<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NITROGEN<br />

DRY MAÎTER<br />

2<br />

3<br />

l+<br />

5<br />

.o33<br />

.012<br />

.o33<br />

.o39<br />

.o3r+<br />

.009<br />

.oz]-<br />

.OlrZ<br />

.036<br />

.040<br />

. 06r+<br />

.120<br />

.o97<br />

.3r4<br />

.065<br />

.ot7<br />

.201<br />

l3.25<br />

7T<br />

.o24 -.009<br />

.0Io -.0ø2<br />

.030 -.003<br />

.0r+3 +. oórr<br />

.040 +.006<br />

.011r. +.005<br />

.o27 +.006<br />

.030 -.00d<br />

.034 -.002<br />

.o4r<br />

.064<br />

.086<br />

.o33<br />

.o33<br />

.o3L<br />

.o23<br />

.L29<br />

8.65<br />

+.001<br />

.000<br />

- . o3r+<br />

-.o6t+<br />

-.28r<br />

-.031<br />

+.006<br />

-.o72<br />

-À.60<br />

.0116<br />

. oL8<br />

.036<br />

.044<br />

,o\2<br />

. olt<br />

,o23<br />

.ol+5<br />

.Ot z<br />

'o5o<br />

.o73<br />

'f.l+7<br />

.14d<br />

.576<br />

.078<br />

.018<br />

.306<br />

23.3L<br />

$-7-wqs -fed prlor to the cereaL test diet sequence, results from plg number L were not,<br />

inc luded.<br />

M-14 was fed following the cereal test diet sequence, results fron plg nunber I were<br />

not included.<br />

columns A and B indicate the differences between il.ear and faecal revels. S<br />

Expressed as grams per 100 grams dry natter intake.<br />

\o'<br />

Determlned by acid hydrolysis.<br />

Urz<br />

.030 -.01ó<br />

.or& -.00[<br />

.o39 +,003<br />

.o57 +.013<br />

.049 +.007<br />

.oL7 +.006<br />

.03[ +.011<br />

.or+o -.005<br />

.0ÀÀ +.002<br />

.05l+<br />

.083<br />

.111<br />

.otrz<br />

.058<br />

.045<br />

.o25<br />

.L67<br />

l3.l+2<br />

-.o02<br />

+.01-o<br />

'.Ðe<br />

-. 106<br />

-.518<br />

-.o33<br />

+.002<br />

-.r39<br />

-9.92


of tiìe j.leun to the -faeces. These increases na;,: have 'ceen<br />

Cue tc de nci'o nicrcbiel sl,'nth3sis of these eirj_nc acids<br />

fron nltrc:en th:t was Cer.ived frc;: ;ic:.cbia1 dear.:inaficn<br />

Oí 'r,he na-ic¡ ¿initto eciis present 1n n'Ltcin.<br />

The le ,¡el_s of Pi.O in il_eel digeste. frcm Ì.--l and<br />

ì--Id r¡s¡¿ .314 anC .57C gr zns per ICC ;rans cí dr;' *.aa".<br />

intake respectivel-":' (ieble 44 ) . îÌ:e PÈO l-e',.eLs in ileal<br />

diëe ste frcn corn, whêat end barle',¡ were . 2ZZ, ,LlL ato<br />

.21 2 respecti';el-1,' (Table 42). True il:el av:iiabilities<br />

cf PF,O e:


pêr iCC ãrens cí irj,' :âtter intake, cf tie ¡er:a.l and<br />

r'::.intenanc: ilers ¡ave ccrresponCing net;bolic ileal ?;ìC<br />

'I ¡r¡al c ¡l 1ôn ']<br />

"<br />

barle;. rcspectr:-lel-r. Thus, iru= ileal- pF,C ar,'ailabiiitie s of<br />

9î.3, 9a.9 :ni 103 .Çii vrere obtainecÌ ícr cci.n, wheat anC<br />

barle-r respec-r.i.ve 1". The cal_cul_aticn carr.ie cì cut assuned<br />

â lineâr ::ola'.íclshin ì:ett;een crude fi'ce ¡ intake anC<br />

'i I c:1 ÐP:1 1-r.:l c<br />

.lccording tc Sauer et 3.1 . (f9?L) neiabolic a;rino<br />

acíC 1e\'eLs ccrrespcncing tc perticular test C j-ets sl:culd<br />

be Cet=rnined !.ri'i,h crotein-free diets thet ccntain the sare<br />

level cf unii eestible d:.¡' :attir as the tes.t diets frcin<br />

tvhic¡: cne Ce:e::.lines tf.e true a:inc e:ic ¡'.-aileiilltle s. The<br />

^?^:1h+- ^ -ia .a',. ú:l-Ci.,inLS ñaêc.iF- .È;Ê^rr-È C' C.f7 I:âit:¡ +<br />

I-rùÐ-:.: L:-r !,,i::_ -le enJ CÍ the iJ_:U:,<br />

pe r 1Cû grans of drrl' netter intaire , r,vere Lj .Zi , Z) ,3L, Lg ,gC ,<br />

26.7C e!\i. lJ.8C 3rans îar i--7, i_-1,!, ccÍ'n, r.;heat anci barle;r<br />

respectil¡ê1" (lab1e 42 enC 4f ). Sinilar t;-pe cf ccr.reciicns<br />

(as ior e c-uel- ci'ude fibe:. intake ) íor the deterninaticn cf<br />

retahclic il-e al- PÌC level_s noul_i result in tru¿ ?l-"0 aveil_a_<br />

biLities exceeding 100f, fcr eII ce:.eal_ gi.ains r.ested.<br />

Ti-.e interpretation cf dei.a c'cta j-neii Í:.cn the<br />

nei:rt=nance anci ce:.eal test Ciets i:: ti^e c:.:r.-ic,:s secticr:<br />

ir'ere Ì:ased cn :'=sult,s -,hat were expr"essed ês êi:ans reÌ. IOC<br />

¡:'l:s c-i ::';i .::e'*t:r lnta).=, Th: :1-3:.eã: C:i1-.- .ir;- i-.âtrej.<br />

ir.t:ke '¡" *"1:e p1;s îed _l-? e:ld i.-lt¡ was ll"ã: (ê?.31, o.f<br />

'l?1


al-lowable intake ) and Ç35 grar¡is (48,9!3 of allov,'able iniake )<br />

132<br />

respectivelj¡ (Appendix, Tabl-e 9). The average dail¡r dry natieÌ'<br />

intake of the cereal diets by the pigs was equal to the<br />

allowable daily intake in aii cases anci was l_d55, Id49 anci<br />

LE57 for corn, wheat and barley respectively (Appendix,<br />

Table l, 4 and 5). Calculations baseC on equal total crude<br />

fiber intake for the cereal and aaintenance diets (in the<br />

sane aanner es they were caried out for crude fj.ber iniake<br />

per 100 grams of dry n:aiter intake) will result in true<br />

PRO availabilities of 96.7, 100.4 and lO7.li; for corn, rvheai<br />

and barley respectively.<br />

From the previouè discussion one might believe that<br />

PRO of casein was o.f relatively low availability at the end of<br />

th.e ileun. Ìf this was the case for pfi,O, what thon about the<br />

true ileal availabilities of the other amino aci"ds fron casein?<br />

laking into accounl the possibility that casein was<br />

perhaps not completely digesied. and absorbed brr the end of the<br />

i1eum, coraplete protêin-free diets v¡ere fed to the cannul_ated<br />

pigs as part of study 4a. Therefore, the ciata obtaineci íor<br />

nretabolic ileal and faecal anino acid levels fror:: feeding the<br />

protein-free diets in study 4a rvill be used ior the estinations<br />

of true ileal anino acid availabilities f:"om corn, wheat anci


'ìi+.:^<br />

e aï'ô t<br />

-l .i ^+ ^<br />

lhre: ijjí:rent :rcte1::-jree dieis cc:rtainllg !,<br />

l-C anC 1j;1, alphafioc j.espectiys]..r r,.r3¡o fed -.o the pigs 1n<br />

study La. The ê,.r3râîe iallv dr-. :etter inta]:: r",ere l_l5l Ê.<br />

ícr ?I-5i I)57 g. for.PF-10 anC 1109 g. íor pF-15<br />

/'^-^-;i- a^r-r ^ .r<br />

\.-:.:v.-.--s:-!, -c.-!v .. , 21. and 25 ).<br />

Coniinucu_s prcblens h'e.rê experienced du_ring the<br />

f:eCin¡ of the ?F-l_5 iiets. Elockage ccc,_,.rr.ei fr=c_uentl¡r,<br />

Sften the cannuiae 'cecane dlsconnectecì, z.esu_ltíng in large<br />

ioss:s cí digesta. lhr:e cf the 6 pigs l.rent ccrpletel_v cff<br />

f :e d after. the fir.st ci- se ccnC cê,,¡ th.i -"h=i, vere cffered the<br />

Pi-15 C j-ets, The refor.e , suita'oie statist,icei ¿¡¿frrs3s fç-r,<br />

the deterninêtion of t]:e effect cf bcC¡i v,reight end l_evel cf<br />

di-.târ-r' f i':e r cn ;::eta'roIic i,Lea1 anC faecel anino acid level_s<br />

cculC nct be per:-cred. P:.evious Ì.esults c'c.tein=d frcn pigs<br />

fed the naintenance Ci3ts (Tâble 26) and fl.on i-:ts feC ihe<br />

prctein-fr:e dier.s (Ta'cle 1û ) shcl"¡eC that --he:.e .',.;a s ,¡ir.t ual_l..-<br />

nc efÍect- cÍ i¡eiEi.t on thenetaboiic faeca.l- ¿¡-.ino ¿cic ievels<br />

t.;hen these l/rel.e expr_êssed as grens pet 1OO ,ri.a:ls cí Cri,<br />

äetier intak=. _r.lthcuqh Cata l.rer,e a¡,-a i-'t a':1: onl¡, í:-cr. pigs<br />

¡r::,¡hc-ar{ Á .-Á O +l<br />

, r e :ì-ã r.sults obtain:C sç=:t:i to i.r:cicere<br />

that r,¡eirht haC nc ne_cÌ. 3Íf?ct cn tle :retâ.'cclic il_e:I<br />

:::inc :cij i-.-:.:r s (.t¡psnCix, Te'rle 2L a:1: 2: ).<br />

ns<br />

'I i?


ïn general , increasing the fiber levels of the<br />

protein-free diets increased the netabolic ireal and faecal<br />

anrino acid and nitrogen revers. The increment in the reveJ-s<br />

of iLeal and faecal arnino acids levelred off as ihe arphafroc<br />

content of the protein-free diets was raised fro¡r l0 to L5ji<br />

(Table 45 ) . Due to the lir¡rited aäiount o.f resulis available<br />

from diet PF-15, it is not possible to tell if the increase<br />

in metabolic ilea1 and faecal aníno acid levels with in_<br />

creasing fiber intake is of a linear or a curvilinear<br />

relationship. Theoreticall¡r, it is not unreasonable to<br />

pos¿ulate a limit to metabolic losses by the ani¡nal and<br />

assune a curvilinear relationship.<br />

. The relationships of the ileal and faecal ar¿ino<br />

acid and nitrogen 1eve1s betr,veen I.l_ Z and l{_lle were basically<br />

L3l*<br />

sirnj.lar to those observed be.tween pF_5 anci FF_IO (Tab1e 4& anci<br />

45). For both PF-5 and PF-10 (and also for pf-15), there was<br />

a consistent net disappeârance of ARG, TH.,ì, Giy, pRO and SiR<br />

in the large intestine. consístent net increases were found<br />

for flE, LEU, i,yS, i,fET, pHE and ASp.<br />

ït seemed that as the leve1 of alphafloc was j.ncreased<br />

fronr 5 to rofi, particular anrino acids decreased, nore (for e:lar,rple<br />

GLT and PRO) and particular anino acids increased nore (for<br />

exanple ll,E, LEU, LYS and pHI). <strong>fn</strong> other r,rords, nore nicrobial<br />

fermentation seemed to take place in ihe large intestine v¡ith<br />

PF-10 than with pF-5.


TÂBLE 45. Amlno acld, total, nltrogen and dry ratter appearânce (+) or<br />

disappearance (-)t in the large intestlDe 1n pigs fed the<br />

proteln-free dLets.<br />

LEvxL OF<br />

ALPHAFLOC (ø}<br />

LOCATTON<br />

ÂMINO ACIDS<br />

Essenùla1<br />

-tñe'-<br />

HTS<br />

ILE<br />

I,EU<br />

LTS<br />

MEl<br />

PIIE<br />

THR<br />

vAL<br />

Non-EssentlaL<br />

ALA<br />

. ASP<br />

cTs<br />

GLU<br />

CLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYT<br />

NITROGEN<br />

DRY MATTEN<br />

1<br />

?<br />

ILEUM2 FAECES2 A<br />

. o[9<br />

.0r4<br />

.o2L<br />

.o39<br />

.02?<br />

.006<br />

.o23<br />

.o39<br />

,ort<br />

'o41<br />

.056<br />

.o13<br />

.07L<br />

.!39<br />

. r+Zt+<br />

.038<br />

.o13<br />

.205<br />

TL.67<br />

.o22 -.O27<br />

.o10 -.ootl<br />

,o27 +.006<br />

.042 +.003<br />

.036 +.009<br />

.012 +.006<br />

.026 +.003<br />

.030 -.009<br />

.o33 +.002<br />

,036 -.o05<br />

.06r +.o05<br />

.oto -.0o3<br />

.068 -.oo3<br />

.031 -.10¿t<br />

.026 -.4'+8<br />

.026 -.o12<br />

.o1¡l +.oo1<br />

.lot -.104<br />

6.1+8 -5.L9<br />

10<br />

IIÆÙü2 FÀECESz B<br />

II,EUT{2 FAECESz C<br />

,o29 -.O29 .061<br />

.01À -.001 ,o22<br />

,o39 +.0r0 . o31<br />

.059 +.008 .O57<br />

.048 +.o12 .o39<br />

.0r7 +.009<br />

,o37 +,OØ .o33<br />

.0,¡1 -.010 .o59<br />

,0[9 +.006 .olt[<br />

.056 .o53 -,oo3 .O58 .o59<br />

.o7t .08t+ +.006 ..o81 .096<br />

.016 .o13 -.003<br />

.094 .096 +.0O2 .too .108<br />

.L7l .oi3 -.128 ,tç9 .or+7<br />

.ii? .0116 -.53L .185 .o38<br />

.0r+9 .o35 -.01l} .o52 -O3?<br />

,oii .oi6 +.OOi ,016 .oI8<br />

.256 .t39 -.117 ..27L .1q1<br />

L7.69 LO.st -7.J.6 26.32 14.78<br />

Expressed aB grans¡ per 100 gran dry natter intake, shovrn in colu¡nns A, B, c and D.<br />

CoIunnB indicate lfeal or faecel 1ev6ls.<br />

Converted results fron Holmes et aL,, (1974),<br />

-.o28<br />

- ,oo7<br />

+. O24<br />

+.010<br />

+.0t5<br />

+.007<br />

-. olr+<br />

+.009<br />

+,0O1<br />

+. O15<br />

+. o08<br />

- .r22<br />

-.51+7<br />

-.016<br />

+. o02<br />

-.110<br />

-It. rrl<br />

Lk.51<br />

ILEuM2 FA¡cEs2 D<br />

.L37 +.10ó<br />

.006 +,003<br />

.051 +.O25<br />

.o89 +.048<br />

.o92 +.056<br />

,o20 +. o17<br />

.o55 +.O33<br />

.o72 +.030<br />

.o59 +. O2t-<br />

.o48 .o82 +.031+<br />

.058 .1lo +.o72<br />

.005 .o25 +.020<br />

.080 .L62 +.082<br />

,082 .o78 -.oot+<br />

.33L .OtL -.297<br />

.oLd .o50 +.o)2<br />

.0[o .o71 +.031<br />

',+27 .360 -.06?<br />

L9.20 13.[O -5.80<br />

P


liolnes ç! al. (L97U) fed c:.otein-free Ciers<br />

containing Id. !'rJ alphafLoc to 6 cannul_ated pigs that ',.reigired<br />

approxinately !+5 kg. Their results and those obtained in<br />

these studies lrere quite díi.ierent (Tabte 45 ). ir'ith *,,he<br />

exception of PRO and clY, Iiolnes et al . (L9?L) found a<br />

net increase of al-l andno aciCs between the end oÍ the il_eu_n<br />

and the anus. These increases l^iere ver¡r substantial for ARG<br />

especially, -:U, :TS, ASP and GLij. The anino acid corirposition<br />

(grains per 16 grans of niirogen ) of netabolic faecal protêin<br />

f:'orn pigs deternined at diffe::ent labor.atories j-s shov;n in<br />

'1 1A<br />

Table 46. Al-though there r^¡ere difÍerences i n ."he composi tion<br />

for sonre anino acids (?Tij, S:.,', and TyF; in particular ) , generat Ìy<br />

speaking the resulis obtained. i.n these studies, ihose of<br />

Danme:.s (1964), car-1son and Ëaylei, (r9?o) ând rggun (1!/t)<br />

cor4pare reasonebll¡ Heli. The netabolic faecal anino eciC<br />

cor:position obtained b,r' äoh¿es et al. (l-97 U) diff ered nar.Ìredlli<br />

frcn those obtained in these s'undi.es and -ír.on the o-,,her woriiers,<br />

e speci-al 1¡r t^rith r.egs.:.d to the conient of ÁRG and ijfS. rnsuf_<br />

ficient dietary ecuilibration may heve taken place by the tine<br />

iiolnes et. al- . (197 4) collecteci f aecai riate::ial_ . ihe la'urr,er<br />

rnal¡ have contrib'uteci to t,he rel ative,r y ]arge increases -,,hat<br />

'1.¡ere iound for sc:lie ar:ti no acicis betrveen t,ile end of the iie,;.-t<br />

anc.l '¿lie anus in their siud.i es (îabLe l*5 ) .<br />

The levei oÍ .fiber i-nciusion in the proieir:_ír.ee<br />

diets j-n t,hese studies dict no'{, seen ¡o have a na;or effeci


TABTE tÌ6. Anino acid composltionl of metabolic protein d€ternined at<br />

df fferent laboratories.<br />

AMT$O ACTDS<br />

Egsential<br />

AAG<br />

HIS<br />

rLE<br />

I,ETJ<br />

IYS<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

lHR<br />

vAt<br />

Non-Essentlal<br />

I<br />

t<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

cYs<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÏR<br />

SAUER (1976)2<br />

PF-5 PF-10 Pr-15<br />

3.t+9 3.3t+<br />

1.58 L.62<br />

l+.28 l+.18<br />

6.65 6,?9<br />

5.?o 5.53<br />

r.90 L.96<br />

t+.Lz b.26<br />

L.75 t+.72<br />

5.23 5.6t+<br />

9.66 9.67<br />

1.56 1.50<br />

LO.77 11.05<br />

l+.91" I+.95<br />

t+.Lz 5.29<br />

t+.L2 4.03<br />

2.22 f .8¡)<br />

5 .70 ó. 10<br />

3.28<br />

L'ttg<br />

l+.1+7<br />

6.66<br />

5.37<br />

3.98<br />

l+.1t7<br />

5.27<br />

5.86<br />

9.5L<br />

LO.73<br />

\.67<br />

3.?8<br />

3.68<br />

L.79<br />

Expressed as grams per 16 grams of nitrogen.<br />

ÐAIJIMERS CARLSON ANd<br />

(L964) BAYI,ET<br />

(1970 )<br />

3.20<br />

1. &0<br />

Il. OO<br />

5.60<br />

4.90<br />

2.10<br />

3.60<br />

4.80<br />

5.00<br />

5.30<br />

9.00<br />

r..50<br />

9.1+O<br />

I+.20<br />

3.80<br />

1. d0<br />

ulão<br />

6. r+o<br />

4.30<br />

3.80<br />

5.10<br />

4.90<br />

5.00<br />

8.30<br />

8.00<br />

ö.30<br />

2,20<br />

4.?o<br />

3.00<br />

EGGUM HO¿MES<br />

(r97r) er al<br />

]Jemt<br />

l+.I9 6.09<br />

2.O9 O.27<br />

3.97 2.27<br />

6.07 3.96<br />

5.65 L.Og<br />

2.O3 0.89<br />

5.09 z.t+t+<br />

,1. 38 3 .2o<br />

t+.82 2.62<br />

5.61+<br />

8.3t+<br />

1.61<br />

10.66<br />

è.48<br />

7.OL<br />

3.t+4<br />

3.61+<br />

5.78<br />

1.11<br />

7.20<br />

3.L7<br />

L.5L<br />

2.22<br />

3.L6<br />

Determined for protein-free diets wíth different levels of alphafloc. inclusion.<br />

?


on tÌre co¡iposi-i,ioil oí neiabol_i c feecal protein (?abie +j ) .<br />

Proline in par.ti"cul ar antj. GLï were present in<br />

abundant ânou.nts in il_ea.] digesi;a fr.o¡a the p:.otein-free diets.<br />

118<br />

(Tab1e 45 ) . These obse:'veiions v¡ouLd elin; nate the possibi--i-";.<br />

tilat PRO f:'on casej-n lvas oi lo-iv availability. b,- the end oí ihe<br />

j-l-ew;r. The level of P;ì0 in iieai tìigesta froin pi.- j was ev€n<br />

higher thån tì'iet, ob'r,ained í:'ora ì _-f ( iabt e +4 and 45 ) . The<br />

levels of FRO obt,ained íror: eiihei' pF-lO, pF-ij or ìl-i4 were<br />

oi the saine order.<br />

.¡.pparent ilea.l- anino acid evailabili-ties and. rttrue<br />

j.l-eal availebilit,ies that uere calcul-ated by using d.i fferent<br />

correclions for ;:ietabolic ileal anino acid Ievels are shoun<br />

in Tablg 47, 4'ð and 49 for cora, wheat anC barle¡, r.especiiveiy.<br />

l.ie'r,abolic i-Ieal anino acicÌ corections for obtaining<br />

irue avail-abiiitÍes wer.e carried out as follo,.os: 1) On the<br />

basis of equal crucie fiber in-ual.:e of the cereal_ ancì. proiej_nfree<br />

ciiets ani 2 ) cn the basi s of eoual encì,nt s of unciigesiible<br />

dr¡r nalter passing t,hrougl-r -uhe end of the íleun fron the<br />

cereaL and protei.n-free ciiet,s. For exanple, as the ievel of<br />

crude Íiber intake increased frcn J.3ó;, íoi. pF-,< to ó.ðO;, ior<br />

PF-10, the level of ne¡eboiic ileal_ LyS íncreased fron .O2J<br />

to . Cl 5 Êrer1s per lOO grans of cìr;r ì:ie-,,',, e Ì. j.niake (Table 32 anC<br />

45). Then, by exirapolation of the line conneciing these<br />

2 points one cen esiinate the netabolic il_eal_ ITS levels et,


TABLE ,+7. Appqlel! ileal anlno acid availabflfties from corn and the estimated true<br />

avaÍlabiLiùies as caLculated by the use of dlfferent type of correciions.<br />

TYPE OF<br />

CORRTCTION<br />

AMINO ACIDS<br />

Essential<br />

-Trc'-<br />

HTS<br />

IIE<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS,<br />

lffiTo<br />

PiTE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

ASP<br />

cYs<br />

GLU<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÏR<br />

NÏTROGEN<br />

3<br />

4<br />

5<br />

6<br />

^ø)r<br />

APPARENT<br />

.l+l+5 .056<br />

.251+ .030<br />

.354 .0U5<br />

L.3o7 .O99<br />

.338 .06r<br />

.25O .020<br />

,523 .0À9<br />

.36h .o?7<br />

.456 .069<br />

.760 .088<br />

.723 .116<br />

.200 .036<br />

2.085 .L66<br />

.399 .L29<br />

.8L3 .222<br />

.505 .O??<br />

,395 . oÀ.3<br />

r.995 .348<br />

B2 c(%f<br />

87.1+<br />

88.2<br />

87.3<br />

92.L<br />

82.0<br />

9L.9<br />

90.6<br />

78.8<br />

8t+.9<br />

88. t+<br />

8t*. o<br />

82.t<br />

92.O<br />

67.7<br />

73.?<br />

8t¡.8<br />

89. t<br />

82.6<br />

D4<br />

CRUDE FTBER<br />

INTAKE<br />

E("/"''5<br />

.0rÈ6 97 .è<br />

.013 93.3<br />

.018 92.L<br />

.o35 95.t<br />

.024 89.t<br />

.005 9¡1.0<br />

.020 9L.5<br />

.o35 86.5<br />

.o27 90.8<br />

.036 93.2<br />

.ot+g go.7<br />

.012 88.0<br />

.063 95.L<br />

.L29 100.0<br />

.t+38 L25.6<br />

.O3tr 93.5<br />

.oLz 92.2<br />

.188 92.O<br />

Column A lndicates the dietary arrlno acid content. 2 colo*r, B<br />

ilear<br />

indicates the apparent<br />

ani.no acid revels, expressed as grans per r00 gram ãry natter tntake.<br />

colunn c indlcates the apparent itear amino acld avai.labilities.<br />

Colur¡ns D indicate t!9 lespective corrected netabollc ileaL amino acid levols, expressed<br />

as grams per 100 grams dry- rnatter <strong>fn</strong>take.<br />

Columns E indÍcate the respective true lleal am<strong>fn</strong>o acid availability estlnates. 5<br />

Deternlned by the oxidation method.<br />

\o<br />

TRUE<br />

DRY MATTER<br />

P¡,SSAGE<br />

Dl+<br />

.058<br />

.oL7<br />

.o2g<br />

.051<br />

.035<br />

.030<br />

.05r-<br />

.ol+3<br />

.05a<br />

.078<br />

.09l+<br />

.t7L<br />

.577<br />

.0119<br />

.015<br />

.256<br />

Eø15<br />

100.r+<br />

9t+.9<br />

95.5<br />

'96.3<br />

92.3<br />

96.b<br />

92.9<br />

th.3<br />

95.8<br />

2!.7<br />

96.5<br />

IIO.5<br />

LI+z.L<br />

9l+.5<br />

92.9<br />

' 95.4<br />

D4<br />

.028<br />

.oo7<br />

.003<br />

.012<br />

.009<br />

.002<br />

.007<br />

.oLz<br />

.003<br />

.006<br />

.00r+<br />

.009<br />

.020<br />

.07l+<br />

.222<br />

.or3<br />

.009<br />

.o90<br />

PROLINE<br />

Eø)5<br />

93.7<br />

90,9<br />

88. r<br />

93.3<br />

81. e<br />

92.8<br />

92.O<br />

82. t<br />

85.5<br />

89.5<br />

8t+.5<br />

86.5<br />

93,L<br />

86.2<br />

100.0<br />

8?.3<br />

91.t+<br />

8z.t


TABIE ,¡8. Apparent-Íleal amlno acid availabititles from wheat and the estimated true<br />

availabllities as calculated by the use of different type of corrections.<br />

TÏPE OF<br />

CONRECTION<br />

AMINO ACIDS (ø)<br />

Essentlal<br />

-ætr-<br />

HIS<br />

ILE<br />

I,E1'<br />

LYS,<br />

I\MTO<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

-m'-- ASP.<br />

cYS0<br />

GLT)<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

A(%f<br />

APPARENT<br />

cv"f<br />

¡4<br />

CRUDE FTBER<br />

ÏNTAKE<br />

E(/ò5<br />

DNY MATTER<br />

PASSAGE<br />

Ev")5<br />

?gr, :8i? 89:I :8tl Etr:; :ïrL B9:Z<br />

{r44 .065 85.t+ .otd 89.t} .031 S2.s<br />

97.O .L?Z 86.9 .O3r+ 9O.r+ .Oi7 SZ.t<br />

3-ç? .999 7r.? .92tr q?. j .oie 's6'.t<br />

?t+L .o32 86.7 .oOi 88.t<br />

ç7\ .o75 8$.8 .o2o 91.6 .033 s3.?<br />

3_96- .q?l 26.+ .03rr $i.z .ote ef'.i<br />

5I+5 .o9r+ 82.8 ,026 8?.j .o4rÌ So.ð<br />

.L27 .o35 Ê1.1 .058 85.9<br />

.L67 .Qb7 q2.3 .081 87.3<br />

.ot+z .012 89.3<br />

.32L .06? 9¡1. t .100 g5.o<br />

.LI+9 .L26 95.9 .L69 Lo3.5<br />

.191 .\32 L\6.7 .585 L27.3<br />

.101 .o33 89.3 .o53 Sz.L<br />

.o57 .012 88.9 .016 89.9<br />

. 1188<br />

.677<br />

.28L<br />

Il.4À0<br />

.566<br />

L.t+t+5<br />

.633<br />

.Iro7<br />

z.60T<br />

NONE<br />

82<br />

NÏTROGEN . Ll+5<br />

7L,O<br />

75.3<br />

85.1<br />

92.7<br />

73.7<br />

86.8<br />

8tl. o<br />

86. o<br />

82.9<br />

.184<br />

90.0<br />

Lr 21 3, \r 51 6 Refer to Table tfl for expranatlon.<br />

.27L<br />

93,3<br />

¡4<br />

PROLTNE<br />

E(r"r5<br />

:86á E?:2<br />

.001 85.6<br />

.009 d7.8<br />

.006 77.r+<br />

.001 gZ.t<br />

.005 89.6<br />

.009 78.8<br />

.000 82.d<br />

,00o 75.3<br />

.008 87,9<br />

.016 93.L<br />

.066 85.3<br />

.L91 100.O<br />

.010 85.6<br />

.oo8 d8.o<br />

.076 8¡. ¿<br />

. oo4 7t+.8<br />

ts<br />

O


TABI,E l+9. App+Iel!-iLeal arnlno acld availabillties fron barley and the estinated true<br />

availabilities as cal-culated by the use of different type of corrections.<br />

TTPE OF<br />

CORRECTTON<br />

AMINO ACIDS<br />

Essentlal<br />

--ffiE_<br />

HIS<br />

rLE<br />

I,EU<br />

LYSz<br />

MET()<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

AtA<br />

ASP.<br />

CYSO<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NITROGEN<br />

L, 2, 3, l+, 5,<br />

A$f<br />

.569<br />

.229<br />

.390<br />

.855<br />

.l+L5<br />

.L93<br />

.60L<br />

.381<br />

.5LL<br />

.t+82<br />

.691+<br />

.zLg<br />

2.927<br />

.l+85<br />

L.2t5<br />

.501<br />

.36t+<br />

2.222<br />

APPARENT<br />

B2<br />

NONE<br />

cv")3<br />

.to6 81.À<br />

.0r+5 80.3<br />

.082 79,O<br />

.158 8L.5<br />

.111 73.3<br />

.038 80.3<br />

.Lo7 82.2<br />

.110 ?L.L<br />

.120 77.9<br />

.L46 69.7<br />

.200 7t.2<br />

.Orl9 ?7.6<br />

,393 86,6<br />

.f68 65.tþ<br />

.232 80.9<br />

.LLg 76.2<br />

.o7h 79.2<br />

.558<br />

7L.9<br />

D4<br />

053<br />

oL5<br />

02b<br />

04'+<br />

030<br />

007<br />

026<br />

oÀl}<br />

036<br />

Ol+7<br />

070<br />

01À<br />

080<br />

L52<br />

CRUDE FTBER<br />

ÏNTAKE<br />

5L6 1<br />

ot+2<br />

0t rl<br />

225<br />

6 R"f"r to TabLe l+7 for explanation.<br />

E$)5<br />

90.? .06r<br />

86.9 .O22<br />

85,1 .03r<br />

è6.? .o5?<br />

80.5 .o39<br />

83.9<br />

È6.5 ,O33<br />

82.7 .O59<br />

8r+.6 .0ÀÈ<br />

79.5 .058<br />

8r-.3 .odr<br />

8lr. o<br />

89.3 .100<br />

96.7 .L69<br />

.23.t+ .5t:5<br />

8[.6 ,o53<br />

83.5 .016<br />

85. O<br />

TRUE<br />

DRY MATTER<br />

PASSAGE<br />

DÀ<br />

.27L<br />

E$)5<br />

92.L<br />

90.0<br />

86.9<br />

88.2<br />

82.7<br />

87.b<br />

86-6<br />

86.0<br />

8L.7<br />

82.9<br />

gõlo<br />

100.2<br />

L29.L<br />

86.6<br />

84. r<br />

87.L<br />

PROLTNE<br />

nb Eø15<br />

o2g<br />

oo7<br />

004<br />

013<br />

009<br />

002<br />

007<br />

013<br />

oot+<br />

.009<br />

.006<br />

.009<br />

.o22<br />

.076<br />

.232<br />

.oLrl<br />

.009<br />

.09lr<br />

86.5<br />

83.4<br />

80.5<br />

83. O<br />

75.1+<br />

8r.3<br />

83.1r<br />

7r+.5<br />

78.7<br />

7L.6<br />

72.O<br />

81.7<br />

87.3<br />

8L.o<br />

I00.0<br />

79,o<br />

82.1<br />

79.t<br />

ts<br />

þ,


c:le:' Ie',-=ls ci cmde ilber í .e. zt the cir_ii: iib=r le v=is<br />

¡j the cere.:i ¡:.:i::s. Thc cr-u_Le íiber le'..Eis c.i cct.::, l.ih-:at<br />

if: ìa:'::. ;,'Cr.: 2.62. ? -:.ê çrì : r':-. -¡..nc -i: ì-: l ,, /-.hì ^ .t.\<br />

.-<br />

_<br />

-¡¡<br />

-<br />

L--Ì: .r:---= ^êÈ^ Utus¿, ^..¿.j^-â i-L:c: !¡_r,..<br />

3jì--¡ I<br />

^r..¡- i_u:¿ _- ^r-^.1 ^<br />

=:S<br />

2t.. t_.y-¿e.4\=)_.. \ _cL,t_j 47,/.<br />

,.,^-..:<br />

\¡iC:-L* :11-:<br />

_..:,.^<br />

ccrr: s¡c:ri.i"::¿ ::t::cl_ic 11e:1 _IS 1_-',._.ls cf î.2*. C. ?4 end<br />

',r.iU ¡re:s -rer .l_ r-ìC g:.a::s ci dr; ::tter i¡:t;ke (:abie LT, 1¿<br />

a.ni +? ) . The a¡par=nt 1leel a:i;:.c aci¡l 1e.,-=is l;ere thcn<br />

cci'rec:e d ícr the cci-iespcncing Ee r-abclic il ea.1 anino acii<br />

l-e'¡ais ancL ti'ue il-eel anino acio :vailatilitie s r.ie¡e cbtalned.<br />

Fcr the ês _:i::ìêiicn oÍ true ilea.l ava-i labil-it res c.i<br />

a¡:ino aciCs 'oaseci cn 'te c_ue1 irlr n^tto- pass:ger?, the ca1_<br />

cu-lations '..¡e'e based on the r-erel s cf i.ndige stible dri.' neti:r<br />

passing thrcurh the enC of the it eun fcr -r,ho tes'u and<br />

pi"otein-free diets. The ¿-.,pe of cci.rections thåt were cetr:ei<br />

rlrz<br />

cut resul--eC 1n :rue atailahit it ies ci lìî tl-.¿t ::lc:e i:c lOC..,<br />

íc:: all cer:e.l- gi'ains. i:r aiditicn, true a',,eilabi,. i-ties cf CLy<br />

exc:ei:d lic.' 1n scre inste.nces ( -abì: l-? , a.- a::d 19),<br />

It si:c;l_i be ke lt :n n1::: .t,het :_et:':olic il_cal ¿::tno<br />

:ni^ I ^=--i c .a^,--.?èc-^-.li-- f L! ^ -:.- r:,ù ^^h^^t _=¿:_: i)qi -:i:+c r.,r¡¡ ^.,: -^<br />

n¡ l =l¡Ä t ,...-a -- .-,<br />

iwç!- !-u .!r-1:ç-rr- -¡ ùri oate c'ctainei i:.cn iiiets ?F_i ¡ ncÌ pi_1C.<br />

-_^¿<br />

^r-^1i^ .:r -<br />

^i,^i-^¡ ^.¡t -- ¡_: rc.!u.L*\_ *¿-:-.,L j= r_^,_ î ¡ j _- ---^ ;.: _<br />

-¿ r./c:.ij U. ,.ä.:jie _i C:.lI:. _- -. _ _._ct<br />

ll-l5 ¡rr.4 ''-..q= qr-: i¡va 'r:e,r 'ci:q.,¡ ì-¡¡¡-...¡ ¡i tL: --¡.^t ¿<br />

' ' '2, -_. w;rJìiS<br />

thct i.¡e r: e::ccu:r,e¡'=d :urir; the l:eil::g cí ti-1s ;iet. ::or.,e -.-:r.


tne in-r, erpreiat ion of resu_lis obtainecj. l+cutC not' chang,:,<br />

esse ntiall;-, .v:ti ií data fron Ci-ei pl-i j r^rere incl_udeC.<br />

fci' the extrapolation cf ireiabolic ileai enino åcid levels<br />

í:'c¡l the pi'otein-free ciets. Si.:rilari;', interpre¡ation of<br />

¡'esults '.,voul-d nol changa if calculations based on total<br />

cruri¡ j:be:' i niel:3 or -r,ot â-r HJr;- :::a-".uei. !assaC3r! .r..iüre<br />

âô,--.;^¡ ^,.+<br />

e


t.aþ e .+) J . '_hcs: ?xtl.erlolâtions rcsulie C 1n veri, f ol.r l:v;l_s<br />

o.f netaÌ:o1ic i-ì eal anino acicÌs ancÌ ;ave t:.ue ileal_ a.,¡aila_<br />

bi.lit_v estj.nates thet Heie ver-;: close io the corresponding<br />

apparent availabi.liti, esiiraies for ;ros.L a;linc acirls (Tabie<br />

^i'I , +¿ ç.i.Lu +i I.<br />

ft is reasonable -r,o âssune that, -r,he true ileal<br />

availabilities of pEO fro:r cereal grains wil_1 be less than<br />

J-uu,;. '"j.leref ore, even ihe calculat,ions based. on ïì.COi, ti.ue<br />

Pì',0 ar,-ailabilii¡r fron cer.eal Sieinsr v.;i1l_ cr.erestinate the<br />

n,-taboli_c j l_e al- anino acid ievels associ ated r,.;ith the f eedin;;<br />

ur urie cereel g:al_ns.<br />

F-egarCless o.f -r,Ìre correciions used, ihe es.ûì;rated<br />

iÌ'ue l-.t_ee.I ¡IS avaì labil-ities .iion corn, v¡heat ancj. bar-iey-<br />

r';e:'e s''i,' i i'elatir¡ei;, 1ov¡ in r:el_âtion io t,ìre othe:. a¡.lino ac i cis .<br />

Corections baseC on ecuar ci-ucle fil-.er l-evel s r-esulteci i_n<br />

esti¡aated true i_leal_ LyS ar,-aiiabiii.i;ies of 69.1, E2.J and<br />

à^ --t üu.);" - lcr corn, wheet and bar.lei- respecti--;ei¡;. <strong>fn</strong> tha.u saüe<br />

order, their r,,re:-e 92.3 , ¿5. 5 and .ò2. ji) ,tihen .cased on ecuaì<br />

rr di'1" ilett,er .lassage rt.<br />

liov,'eve r, the i¡.pe of i:.eiabolic correc-i,ions iler_<br />

íor;red can not be l.aiid since ¡rue iieal pi,O e.nci CÌ,] ava-i l-a_<br />

LL+1"<br />

b;l-it,ies lve:'e obtalneC -,i:at e-.:ce:ied IOC).. Due to the :::-- e :ls j ;e<br />

cisappearance of these anino acids in rhe iarge intestine<br />

(presi*rabir. by nicrobi:-r. ci:g.::i::ailcn ) , t¡ue faecal a.¡ailabiliiies<br />

oÍ the se 2 anino acics ciid;.:o._l e::ceeci .l C0,,.


the calculations and postulations made are subject<br />

to several- possib]-e errors: t) fhe variability of the ileal<br />

PRO levels bethreen pigs fed the protein_free diets (Appendix,<br />

lable 23 , 2tç and, 25), Z) .{lthough consistent r.esults were<br />

obtained with regard to data fror.r di-ets pF_5 and. pF_lO, these<br />

could not be subjected to statistical analysis and j ) Es_<br />

timated true availabirities were based on rinear responses<br />

from data o'otained from the pF-5 and pF_IO dier,s.<br />

- ïn conclusi.on, there is the possibility that the<br />

use of protein-free diets for estimation of n:etabolic ileal-<br />

amino acid levels (and therefore also for metabolic faecal<br />

anino acÍd leve1s ) may result in overesti¡nation of the<br />

actual levels.<br />

r45<br />

The following discussion will deal with some possible<br />

explanations and postulations as to.why protein_free d.ie-r,s can<br />

overestimate the metabolic irear and faecar a¡nino acid losses<br />

as v¡e1l as nitrogen losses.<br />

According to líasset (1965) ingested protein is<br />

mixed with several times its mass of endogenous protein in the<br />

sraall intestine so that wide fluctuations in the amino acid<br />

roixture avaj-lable for absorption rvill not occur. The<br />

relatively constant amino acid nixture produced r^rill contríbute


to naxinrum efficienci.' in the utílization of amino acids by<br />

the animal . 0f course, this proposed horneostatic mechanisrn<br />

is of a short terra nature and will fail if a protein deficiency<br />

(or a specific anino acid deficiency) is imposed<br />

on the animal for: longer periods of time.<br />

r46<br />

Nasset (1965) estirnated that the total dailir enount<br />

of endogenous proteín secreted in*vo the lunen of the smali<br />

intestine of a ?O kg. raan to be 14I-351+ grans (Table 50).<br />

the estinate calculated by Irlasset is much higher than that<br />

calculateci by Fauconneau anci l.richel (L970), rvhicl: r.;as only<br />

67 grarns (Table 50). The ratter authorsr dic not incl_ude<br />

protein fronr intestinal juice as part of the endogenous pro_<br />

*,,ein derived from dige stÍve secretions , Not includ.ing<br />

estinates fron intestinal juice in Nessetrs calculations,<br />

the amount of protein secretad frorn digestive juices into<br />

the lumen v¡iIl be 24-63 grams. The rninimu¡c estimate<br />

obtained, 24 grams, compares reasonably well with that<br />

obtained by Fauconneau and ì.üchel (f9?O), which was 17 grams<br />

(iable 50). The estinates fro¡n both sources for protein<br />

derived fron mucosal shedding were not that different,<br />

namel¡, 50 and ?7-9L Zrams (fa¡te 5C).<br />

The manner in which l.Íasset (L965\ arrived at the<br />

relatively large contributi.on of enciogenous protein from<br />

intestinal juice to the total endogenous protein fron the


T¡.BLE 50. Estination of the daily endogeneous protein secretion into the lumen<br />

of the small intestine of a f0 kg. rnãn.<br />

RETERENCE<br />

ÏTE[fS<br />

PROTEIN FRO]{ DTGESTTVE<br />

SECRBTTONS<br />

Sa l iva<br />

Castric.Iuice<br />

Pancreatic.Iuice<br />

<strong>fn</strong>testínal Juice<br />

Fi ]e<br />

Subtotal ( A )?<br />

SubtotaI (D )J<br />

PROTETN FRO¡.I I,IUCOSAL<br />

SHEÐDT}ÌG<br />

TOTÂL PROTEIN (A):<br />

101ÂL PROTllIll (D )r<br />

r,uc,ls4l PROTËIN ij OF TOTAL<br />

(E )J<br />

I<br />

3<br />

VOLUME. PROTETN PROTETN<br />

Iiters (range )<br />

1.0- 1.5<br />

2.5- 3.5<br />

L.2- t.5<br />

t .0- 2.0<br />

l-5.2-27 ,O<br />

5.2- 7 .O<br />

Daily volrrme of the di¡restive secretions.<br />

Additions include data fron intestinâf juice.<br />

Additions do not include data from inbestinal juice.<br />

}TASSET (T9651 FAUCONNEAU<br />

and I{ïCHEL<br />

(r970 )<br />

{, (rang,e)<br />

0.2-0.8<br />

o.3-o.5<br />

1.0-2.0<br />

0. ¿l-1.0<br />

0.1*-0. ó<br />

grams ( range )<br />

2-I2<br />

8-18<br />

I2-3O<br />

40-200<br />

2-3<br />

64-263<br />

2tn-63<br />

't'7 _o1<br />

rt,r-3 5l+<br />

101-154<br />

50-90<br />

€lrâms<br />

3 E<br />

I<br />

1<br />

12<br />

r7<br />

50<br />

67<br />

ol<br />

75<br />

F<br />


digesl:ive secre-uj-ons is no-,- cieer, j,rasset (f?65) s.ua-r,eci<br />

e s ioll-cv¡s : lrThe vol.,¡ne s of secret,ion viere deriveci Í:.on<br />

ìììany sources anci except for i niest.inal ;uice, the:; are<br />

generailir availabie end accepteci. lhe large volu¡::e for<br />

int,estinal juice was computed Íro¡i the fåct *,het ti.ie pi*l_orus<br />

adnii'u s 7 iiters o.í gastrJ_c ccntents to t,Ìie ciuocienu-n in<br />

24 hr. enci thet gasiric contents are diLuteci three t,o Íive<br />

-"i-nies in the duodenum anC upper jejunun (E?írgstror:i ei aL,<br />

L957 ) , rr Subsequently, ¡¡âsset estiÌ:ra-ued t,he t,otai vol_une of<br />

i,ntestinel- juice secreteC daily into the lunen to be lCt to<br />

20 l-iiers , r,v i'uh variations in protein content fro:n O.lr to<br />

r- .Oi'i (Tabre jC ) .<br />

-n i ¡f ¡¡n<br />

_rr. lruc.r¡rêting iVasset rs data, Íi:.st of alL it is<br />

unclear how he errived at / Iit,ers of gastric contents io be<br />

enptied iaily into -r,he duodenum. !f these Z 1iters, a rjax_<br />

irtun of onl-y 3 .5 ¡.o 5 li-,,ers cân be êccounted Íor by sali_va<br />

ând gestric juice (Table 50 ) . Seconcily, liasse*,, inf ers fron<br />

'¡ork by Ëorgst,r'åh et aI. (W j? ) that ãestr:_c contenis ere<br />

dj-iuted t,hree to five ti¡ries in the duodenun ancÌ uppei,<br />

je-'unun. Ëorgsrrðr:: ë"r af - (L9j7) fed 5CO n1 . Iiquid test<br />

diets to ó hurian sub;ects. Sari:ples o_f di¿esta wer.e taiien<br />

by intubation. -jhe test neal ,1urj.ng its passage ihrough the<br />

duoden'¿n was ciilut,ed to a volune of 1 .5 -uo 2.5 liiers .<br />

Poll:elhyf en¿-f ,çcol, v¡i:ich is not absorbed Ín the int,estine ,<br />

-Lt8


i,'as used es a Ì-eference subsrance ro neesure lhe diluri on.<br />

Ëor¡ever, the


lá'c:'ov¡ske. (:?1) :. 'c ) ::l not inii.?t? a si -r::í:ca::¡ dilution<br />

of i=ad ni.--:'cì::: a'.: t':,a endc:tncus nit:c':n secrote: ir ih¿<br />

ircx:ì:âl pa::s cí thc ali:r=::te::- tract âs ies ':eo:: s.r:¡esteC<br />

by liesse t. Zé'crcrgsk¿ (L973 a, b ) fitteC ducC=nal- r.e-€nti.:.nt<br />

cennul-ee tc 5C kg. piEs. Lith the e).ceriion oí îLï, ti.e<br />

eninc aci,l corpcsi+- i on oí digesta cbtainei at the erd cí<br />

the duoCeriu¡: enC thet cf the Cie-t Íei ucre 1;er' s:niier,<br />

-41'¡c j¡e is Íc:-l::i in :"eleti'-':1-;' high ä:cr:::t s in ;I¡'ccchct ic<br />

¿ciC of the lrile a:rC its selts.<br />

ì.ot ia1:ing in¡o acccunt, the ,jcu.btful I evels ci<br />

enjc.qencrr.s pÌ-c:,t:n se cretio¡:s jz'cr i:rt¡stlnal ,':ic:, p.r.ct.:in<br />

I Ãa<br />

Corir:eC í;:cn ¡:Lr_cosal shedding iL'il_l :eke u_p iÌ:e na;or pi.cpo:.ticn<br />

cf the tote-.l e:cc3enous pr.ctein, na:reI;,' ?5;; u.si:rg iate fi.cn<br />

Feuconneau and l.ichel ând 5C to gCii (a-;:raee is 7C;, ) Lrsi.n6<br />

^-+^<br />

rt,^* /-.'^t^ (a\<br />

v.. Ir¿ÞJ=ú \ -cr:-t )vJ.<br />

Ìle =n:cle::cus protein ie :-1,.-ec frcr: sh:dc:C c=ll_s<br />

¡a..' b= subdir¡i Cei int,c : I ) protein cr aninc e^cids J-ocse1;,<br />

contâine i in tl:ese cel-1s. The p:ote in r¡il-I 'ce I ar.geI-r' :rade<br />

r'¡ ^f ^.'+^^1 ^^*j^ - "lZ-.'::eS tLat h,,C:.c1-.,Sê .{¡ -..i +,.i¡^^:.ir-<br />

anC Cisacchar-iie s, 2 ) prctein anCT'c:: an1:'Lo :c j.ds ti.;htI;-<br />

esscciated ;¡iih inn:i' ar:d cut-..t renì¡i"ane stt'-:ctul.3s, :nC I )<br />

nLlcr..l s pÌ'ctei-n associareC l.;:-th the autsr äen'cr.ane pårt cí tìte<br />

cells. lhe l:st 2 t'-tas cÍ ¡rctei:t .?r3 cf : lc'¡rlr digest i":ii-it:<br />

th:n the c:'tcple sri3 g:'ct€in ¡nC rr'ill ihe r=fc:e :ake :: tl.e


:1a.ior' ¡oz'ti o:'r of 1::Ci.-esti blc e::do¡.eno,.is prctein tl.et<br />

v¡as founC at the enC of tie ileur¡. peptiCc_g11,,ca ns (par.t, oÍ<br />

Íìucu_s protein) are resisiant to trlrpsin and peosin (¡.l1-iso¡,<br />

i97A). Ihe rel-ative diges;ibiì ities o-i rvhole cell_s of<br />

bacteria and cell contents indicated that niiroêen in r.,rall<br />

structures was undigestibl-e (Tannenba:,rn , 196€:),<br />

is it possible, then, that the prc-uein-free Ciets<br />

that were useci in these studies increased the shedding of<br />

epithelial ceLls allove the 1e.¿el nornall-.,- tajcinq place du_ring<br />

th¡ Lrrç r--çuurè iô..^ i h - ^e or +L.- rnè cereai -uest diets? Fee


52<br />

Ìocations in the body, mal¡ have taken place. Âs rn¡as explaineC<br />

previous}¡, a pert of the endogenous protein derived frorn in_<br />

creased cellular slough-off mâ:7 escape nornal digestion (i.e. Uy<br />

digestive enzynes) prior to the end of the ileun. This wourc<br />

result in higher ¡retaboric ireal a¡:ino acid revers than those<br />

that would be obtained during the feeCing of balanced diets.<br />

The higher r¿etabolic ileal arnino acid levels in turn nay give<br />

rise to higher netabolic faecal levels.<br />

Protein-free diets are usualI¡r enployeC to determine<br />

the metabolic faecal ar¿ino acid and nitrogen losses. ln most<br />

experiments ín which protein-free diets are used., faecal<br />

collections are caried out after 5 to lO davs i.e. before feed<br />

consunption becornes too 1ow. The determination of ¡¡eteboli.c<br />

faecar anino acids and nitrogen during this tir¡e rna¡l well have<br />

been the measurement of the undigestible protein conponents<br />

derived from the increased loss of intestinel cerrs. Ðue to the<br />

extensive nodification of msls¡61ic ileal a¡nino acid 1eve1s by<br />

the flora in the large intestine, this rneasurenent will be<br />

¡nore evident when determined at the end of the ileun than when<br />

determined b;r faecal colle ct ion.<br />

The epÍthelial cel1s of the smalI intestine na1, have<br />

been shedded at an increased rate, inítially during the feeding<br />

of protein-free diets. The amino ecid needs of these celrs<br />

could be directl.v dependent on the suppl¡r of arnino acids pro_<br />

Cuced during digestion. îhis suppl,v would be verj¡ 10ü¡ du:.ing


+'-5 frâ¡.in_- ,^a 5É^1"êi¡_.--- ì.r1!ð J<br />

c_-:-_- !-- :-=-r ¿rr* ^¡r . h:;s i-.-si.l: i:: 1nc::ase,j<br />

shsd.din; cí th.sê ceils,<br />

li:e :.e lucticn in ceil nu;:'cer of -uhe sñell intestine<br />

cer 'ce ¿itr-JbuleC to CecreêseC r-ate cf cel-I jcr'::.tion er.d./ cy<br />

increasaC r.êt3 cf celi lcss. ihe inci-e:s:d râte cf ceil 1oss<br />

t¡rcul-d lilie1;. be the first l'êsFons3 cf the sr:ail intestine tc<br />

Ði'ot:::l :=fici:nc'' i.:. e shcrt t3rn ccr:t:.o1 ì-:-cci:â::ls: . ì=-<br />

crease C rete oí ce11 fcrria-uicn a nci ceIl lcss wi'l f prcbabt:¡<br />

beccne noi'e croninent ês proieir: defic:enc,,, ccntlnues íor<br />

longer FÐi'iods cf tine. lhe 1¿tter nechanisi: j"epresent s e<br />

long t -^r'::l ccnti.ol- nechanis;:1. äoope r et al. (Lgí!) :nd tÌ.crdn<br />

et al. (L963) obser\¡ed sl-c'¡er cs11 r.ener.;el of th-: intestinal<br />

cells and reir;-c:C nisl.aticn cí cel-ls f:.cn s¡¡,ç¡5 tc the ti_p oÍ<br />

the vil-li during aCvancei stêges of prct:ir ieficierc¡..<br />

ll:e rr:l'ious irt:rlretation of î,i:nts t:kin¡ rlec: in<br />

the snal-l- ínt,estine utcn feeCing cf loui ll.ctein or p:.otein-frae<br />

C:3ts rrculd ':e oí us: i.c the an1:el c¡r-- Íi rk-e reducticn i-<br />

cel I :rur'ce:. is rct accc:pa::1ii ì-,- :educ:C a'csc:":tior .oj e r:c_<br />

3enous cr eÏo,g€ncus ?ainc acids . iel_e : s: cf the injir¡idual_<br />

enino ecids 'c-.' tl:e proteol¡rtic enzr.¡nes cf the iiEestive<br />

trâct retl':z' than êbscr-pticn of :-ninc acids il"cn the snall<br />

int--stin: ci ti., ¡ig ur:s icunC tc':e:"al: ií:itl::: i:: tl_+ ut.i_<br />

liz¿tion ci prctqin åt +.he int?stin?l- le'..:- ( Z|'crc,,ts, q. -i c^'r '^ I<br />

, .t i t " t'' t<br />

li':r'te{ s:cs ,.f th: sn¿l_l intestine frcn ¡¡ct:in deçIate:<br />

anir"tel s r¡e¡': ÍcunC tc t i":.nspoÌ--i, er:ino acids :c¡e ra¡idi,, into<br />

'I Ãt


the sac than from well nourished rats (lierskovic , 1969;<br />

Kirsch et aI ., 1968). Therefore, the increase in absorplive<br />

154<br />

capacity of the reduced number of celrs in the smalr intes-i:ine<br />

durins protein deprivation nray partially compensate for the<br />

reduction in absorption due to celrurar ross. Tn addiiion,<br />

the intake of protein-free dj-ets by the test animals is<br />

usually much lower than that of nore baranced diets and less<br />

epithelial cells will be necessary for absorption of the<br />

digestive end-products.<br />

Snoot< (19ó5 ) studied rhe effect of the feeding of<br />

protein-free diets on the content of proteolytic enz],nes in the<br />

pencreas of the rat. Compared to cesein, e protein_free diet<br />

depressed the pancreatic content of chynotrypsinogen and<br />

tr¡rpsinogen. Tn addition, digestive enz,"-me s were found to be<br />

less rapidly inactivated (by autodigestion) in the snaIl<br />

intestine when diets containing protein were fed (snook and<br />

ì,ieyer, L964 a and b). Peptides of dietary origin seened to be<br />

responsible for the decrease in autodigestion. Consecuentl:¡,<br />

the feeding of proteín-free diets wiIl resuLt in reduced<br />

enzyme secretion from the pancreas and in faster inactivation<br />

of enzymes secreted into the intestinal lunen. The lov¡er<br />

enzyme aciivity, ín turn, nay result in a reduction in digestion<br />

of endogenous proteÍn that is derived fror¿ shedcied nucosal cel_ls.<br />

The v¡ork by Snook (1965) shows that enzyne secretions<br />

are reduced when protein-free diets are fed. Therefore, one


hÌould expect underestination of netaL,olic i1eal and faecal<br />

ånino acid leve1s when determined by the use of protein-free<br />

diets. îhis seems to be in contradiction to staternents nade<br />

earlier that protein-free diets overestinate metabolic ileal<br />

and faecal anino acid levels. However, one should keep in<br />

nind that protein derived fron digestive secretions nake up<br />

155<br />

only a snall proportion of the total endogeneous pt otein<br />

(Table 50). In addition, one maj/ expect the digestibi].it¡r of<br />

enzyne protein (by eutodigestion) to be higher thån that sf<br />

protein from shedded nucosâl ce1ls, The enz],rces secreted by<br />

the digestive tract are lrsÍnpl]¡r¡ folded peptides, rvithout<br />

undigestible protein co¡xponents that are associated with nucus<br />

protein or cellular membr:ane naterial fron shedded epithelial<br />

<strong>fn</strong> addition to the 1evel of fiber in the diet, the<br />

t.t'pe of fiber was found to affect the netabolic faecal nitrogen<br />

excretion in pigs (T,ihiting and Eezeau, l-95}a), .{s the Cietarl,<br />

level of pure wooC celluLose (So1ka-F1oc ) .r¡as increased frorn<br />

5 to 10 to I5,4", the level of netabolic faecal nitrogen inc¡.easeC<br />

fron .10 to .14 to .I5 grams per lOO grams of dry natter intake.<br />

Raising the dietary level of nethocel in protein-free diets<br />

fron 7 to 14íj increased the metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion<br />

fronr 0.0ó to 0.07 grems. Protein-free diets containing 14 and<br />

2€l' oat hulls resulted in ¡retabolic faecal nitrosen exc:'eticns<br />

of .09 and .1/¡ grans per 100 grams of dry ¡natter intake


esp:ctivel--,'. The actual cruCe fi'oer conten_.:s of solka_ÍIcc,<br />

L,.<br />

-..c -^i L--JU-- h^^ô l c.r:u ^É^ u- ^^+ r. :.,;1ls r¡:êre êiFrcxi::ateI:, i: , 9.A and ;C;i<br />

eâc¡'^r'i"âr" -L^<br />

",,<br />

_!j Ciff::'e:Ìces s-t\,cr in _¡1 netê'a3l i.:tjLai,___ ie fr.c¡l rit-¡:-¡ .-__. _r_n<br />

excretion bettreen the three fiber sou.rc3s tr3re stlJ.l r,-:r;r<br />

:r¡il3::t vihen ti€se 1r€r€ correcteC for ecual cruCa fi-cer<br />

Al ohafloc 1"."'a s the sou:"ce cf f i.ber use.d. in the se<br />

stuCies fcr the deterninaticn of netebclic ileat enC faecel<br />

anino rcid 1:'..e1-s. The conposition of cruCe fib=r (or that<br />

cf acid and neutral-detergent fiber r¡rhich r:ore closell.r Ì.elata<br />

to the absolute anount of unCi€:estible Cietar; dr;., natter<br />

conte nt ) of Aì-ph:fl-oc na;r be cuite diffe:,ent frc!:r thât oí<br />

crud: fiber of ct"her sources, such es fron cereaf grains.<br />

îhe differences in concosition rvould b:,ing about different<br />

lhl¡sicaÌ characteristics v;hich woulci result in iifferent<br />

ph¡'sioloEical and/or nut:.itiona1 responses 'o;' the *uest ani:::als<br />

upon ingesticn of the diets. Cr.ude fiber. i.s conpcsed of<br />

cel-1ulose, J.igni.n and other poll.,sacchårlCes in .,-a::ie^bIe e::cunts<br />

Cepending on the source ol crude fiter. fh=re were i::ge<br />

dlf f erences betr¿;een the con-¡onent s o.f cr.ucie fi'cer' in abíli"t.,'<br />

to :'etain nat:i. anC to forn gels. Cellulose 1^râ- s least e'c13<br />

to ¡'etain weter (ì¿s¡v;ood, ì-973 ).<br />

.l.s r¡as explainei previousl;,, th? test iiet r.iill be<br />

diluteC 'c1' Cige sti.,'e ;uices Curin¡¡ its passa5e tì:rcueh th:<br />

stcr:ach, duodenun and. upper je;unun. <strong>fn</strong> adciition, water '¡ril1<br />

756


from the epitheli-al cells into the 1unen. Fron the upper<br />

t57<br />

;e.iunuri on to the end of the ileur;r (and to the anus), water<br />

v¡ill be reraoved bv absorption. The degree to whi_ch water wi_ll<br />

be absorbed na¡r depend on the type of unCigested dietar¡,<br />

conponents renaininE in the end of the snall intestine i.e. the<br />

t¡rpes of undigestible components in relation to their water<br />

holding capacíties. As the water holding capacity of the<br />

remaining digesta decreases, presurnably the extent of ph1,,síca1<br />

abrasion of epithelial cells by the digesta i,¡ill increase anC<br />

vice versa. ln addition (when the r^¡ater holding capacity is<br />

low), the physical pressure of Cigesta on the intestinal v¿all<br />

will be increased and this r¡or-lld. result in increased peristal-tic<br />

activit¡r. The latter, in turn, will cause nore friction be-<br />

tlr¡een the digesta and the epithelial cell r,¡all , the re'c7 in_<br />

creasing the ph¡rsical abrasion of ce1ls. ihe r.elationship<br />

betr^;een nucus secretion and perist:1tic activit.v is not known.<br />

Hov;ever, it !-s reasonable to assune that digesta that is<br />

difficult to move needs more rnucus for lubrication purposes<br />

so that passege is eased.<br />

I1eal digesta f,rom the cereal diets seemed to be of<br />

a nuch more rrliquidrr nature than digesta fron the protein-f:,ee<br />

and maintenance diets. Linf ortunatel]¡, dry nratter contents<br />

were not neasured. The ileal digesta frbn the cereal grains<br />

flovred r¿¡ith ease into the collection bags ciuring sanpling.<br />

ï1eal digesta fron the protein-free and maintenance diets were


of e thick, ..'iSCcr-'.s and Sr-ickrr nåture . The sr::-f I in;est 1::=<br />

seon=C tc l:..'e dlfiicult;' in nc'.'in-: ti: il-ea1 di5este Îr'ct<br />

these di:is intc the collecticn ':a¡s, ilccke:: cccu.Ì.reC ât<br />

tin=s Cu:'in. ccllecticn cf ileal Ci:":sta frc:: tl.rse iiets<br />

and flow haC tc i:e essist:d scrretin?s 'c.' a¿:it1i. íi r,ishínl<br />

'¡':ic:" irtc tl.r il+:1 cân:tu1ê?.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> sLlrie r"' , prctêin-íi'e e iiet s ci a cc::tposii.i,on<br />

si;iilar :o thê cnes us=C in tl,ese stuiies, neji ccnceivabì;¡<br />

:---c4.r.-¡ ^rrc:.:ras in ti.e :rUCri_tlOn¿i ¡¡a r:l-.-.si ¡ì ¡:..i e¡.<br />

r:echanisils cperâ.¿ing in the s:r¿l-I in¡es'iine , col:pa-reci .,vith<br />

those tal


such and to detei'nine factors affecting the metabol_ic losses<br />

from the aninal . Secondl¡r, protein-free díets are used to<br />

deternine the n¡¡intenance losses of nitrogen (urinary plus<br />

L59<br />

faecal plus cutaneous nitrogen losses ) . The latter is inportant<br />

for the assessnent of protein needs for nraintaining<br />

aninals or adults (l'.unro, L969 ) and for the differentiation<br />

between Frotein reouire¡:ents for growth (and/or producticn)<br />

and those needed for naintenance. Ðepending on the type of<br />

protein-free diet used, rnaintenence losses of nitrogen deriveC<br />

from faeces ma.v actua11.¡ be overestinated.<br />

Certainly, knowledge of "retabolic ileaÌ and feecä1<br />

anino acid leve1s (and generall¡r speaking those of other<br />

díetary ingredientS) is of iaportance. I{ovrever, to sa¡r the<br />

1east, the use of protein-free diets for arriving at these<br />

estír¿ates should be reevaluated. Future studies i.e. bi.' aid<br />

of isotopes, malr be warranteC .to study this topic.<br />

, 0n a practical basis, í.e. for forräulation of<br />

dietary amino acid Levels in relation tc requirenents for<br />

r¡onosastric anirnals, it is not inportant to have separate<br />

knowledge of the arÂounts of undigested and./or unabsorbed<br />

díetary and rnetabolic a¡:ino acids. Eoth sources of anino aciCs<br />

(protein) are lost to the aninal The detarmj.naticn of apparent<br />

amino acid availabilities will_ be sufficient.<br />

ïn the previous discussion ¡ììost attention was paid.<br />

to the estimetion of true ileaI an:ino acid availabilities.


. 160<br />

True faecel availabilities werê not discussed. Interpretation<br />

of calculated true faecal anino acid availabilities would be<br />

more ¡risleading since an edditionaL error cones into plel./,<br />

nanel¡r that certain ânino acids are s¡rnthesized by the flora<br />

in the large intestine upon feeding of protein-free diets.


STUÐÏ L.<br />

The result s obtained frcn stud¡.- l*'r rvill be discussed<br />

prior to those of stud:. 4e.<br />

The ileal- nitroqen ând ,Cr:,' natter iigesti'cilities anC<br />

the ilea1 a-¿ailabilities of al1 anino acids lvere hJ-gher for'<br />

finel-'r grounC than for cracked r,;h e at- (Table 51 ) . For no s',,<br />

anino acids, these increases vrere significant. The increased<br />

availabilities were due to 1) the absence of cracked or<br />

'oroken feed particles that r,¡ould have escaped physical<br />

digestive breakdown in case cracked u¡heat was fed anC 2) fine<br />

grinding nay have resulted in an increased release of aleurone<br />

protein fron the aleurone cells and n:ore of this protein na:¡<br />

have been available for diqestion.<br />

161<br />

The first reason for increased a.¿ailabilities of anino<br />

acids fron finel¡,' ground over crecked ïheat is shown in Table Jó.<br />

ïhe dietarl.' particle size distribution of fíne1¡.' ground and<br />

cracked wheat is reflected in the particle size ciistribution<br />

of j.leal digeste. Cnl1' 5i, oî the p:rtlcles 1n ileal digesta<br />

frcn f inel¡i grounci r.rheât ldere larger than 1.0C ¡:n. iioriever<br />

approxinateL,v 25f of the pa:'ticles in i.leal digesta fron<br />

craci


TABLI 51. The apparent i.l-eal and faecal amino acid availabilities from ground and<br />

cracked wheat in addition to the digestibÍlities of amino acids in the<br />

large intestine and the differences in percentage units between ileaI<br />

and faecal amÍno acid availabilities<br />

TYPB OF<br />

PR]I- PROCESSIIIG<br />

LOCATION<br />

AÌ,1nr0 ACIDS (ø)<br />

Essential<br />

HÏS<br />

ÏLE<br />

LEU<br />

IYS<br />

PHE<br />

J. nlt<br />

VAL<br />

lJon-Essential<br />

--ÏÏî--<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

OLY<br />

PRC)<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

92.O<br />

91.1<br />

90.2<br />

ol Ã<br />

dr É<br />

oro<br />

83.7<br />

88.6<br />

82.L<br />

82.8<br />

95.3<br />

8r .7<br />

84.5<br />

88.2<br />

89. I<br />

IrrrnocuN (i3 ) 88.4<br />

DRY I:ATTER (f ) 80.4<br />

I<br />

.)<br />

o, ,.<br />

9l+,1,<br />

9r.2<br />

92.9<br />

85.3<br />

ô?Ã<br />

88.7<br />

9r.3<br />

87.r<br />

87.r<br />

97.8<br />

90.1<br />

95.9<br />

93.3<br />

90,7<br />

93.4<br />

88.8<br />

GROUND<br />

3 0.0 2.2<br />

37 .L 3.3<br />

lo.2 1.0<br />

ß.5 1.4<br />

2O.5 3.8<br />

8.5 0.6<br />

30.7 5 .O<br />

aa 1 a.7<br />

27 .9 5.0<br />

25:.O U.3<br />

53.2 2.5<br />

t+5 .9 8.4<br />

73.5 11.4<br />

t+3.2 5.I<br />

8.8 o.9<br />

5r.7 Ãrl<br />

t, t c1 8.4<br />

86.5<br />

àF n<br />

85.6<br />

87 .6<br />

.ia A<br />

89.4<br />

78.0<br />

Òr.r<br />

7l+.5<br />

ar7 ')<br />

9l+.L<br />

7 l+ .l+<br />

83 .8<br />

84.7<br />

85.3<br />

CRACKED<br />

93.9<br />

93 ,9<br />

89.9<br />

92.I<br />

B3.B<br />

92.9<br />

87 .3<br />

9O.5<br />

54,8 7.r+<br />

57 .3 8.2<br />

29.9 t+.3<br />

36.3 4.5<br />

t+O.g 1t.2<br />

33,o 3.5<br />

t+2.3 9.3<br />

43 .8 7 .t+<br />

86.5<br />

86.?<br />

97 .6<br />

89.8<br />

96.3<br />

9o.3<br />

90.6<br />

92.)<br />

88.8<br />

t?.r 12.0<br />

39 .2 8.9<br />

59.3 3.5<br />

60 ,2 L5 .tr<br />

77.2 r2,5<br />

36.6 5.6<br />

36.1 5 .3<br />

49 .7 7 .6<br />

5L.7 12.0<br />

Di.ge stibil itie s of amino acids, nit.rogen and dry matter in the large íntesti-ne.<br />

Differences in percentage units between ileal and faecal amino acid avail-abiI itie s .<br />

Differences between ileal anino acid availabilities from finely ground and cracked wheat.<br />

8l+.7<br />

76.8<br />

H<br />

o.<br />

t\)<br />

c3<br />

ÊE<br />

E'<br />

1.t<br />

3.9<br />

dÕ<br />

J.)<br />

EÊ<br />

'lt<br />

7.3<br />

o.7<br />

).5<br />

l+. 5<br />

1n<br />

3.6


(îab1e 5I). Lysine, GLT and ALA are relatively high in<br />

aleurone protein. Phenylalanine, GLU and PRO are reletively<br />

low in aleurone protein (Tabte 2 end 33 ). Ëxtrapolations<br />

as tõ PRO end GLY with regard to increased availability of<br />

aleurone protein for digestion due to grinding should be<br />

L63<br />

considered carefulll' since these 2 anino acids are found in<br />

relativel;r high amounts in netabolic il.eal protein.<br />

the faecal amino acid availabilities v¡ere onl¡r slightly<br />

and non- signific antly higher for finely ground than for cracked<br />

lvheat (Îable 51 ). therefore, it is very diffícult and<br />

unreliable to ßeasure differences due to rrpre-processingir b;r<br />

sÍnpl¡,r evaluating faecal digestibility rûeasurenents. Additional<br />

rneasurernents, such as urinary nítrogen losses or rate of gain,<br />

should be carried out concomit ant1y. The latter findíng is<br />

in agreement with data that inciicate that availabilitl¡ values<br />

determined bl' faecal analysis ere generalh,<br />

higher tHan tiro se<br />

deter¡:ined by grovrth methods (de lluelenaere et aI .,1967i<br />

Nesheim and Carpenter, 1967i Pâyne et a1 ., 1968). The ileal<br />

and faecal availabilities of LYS fror: ground wheat Ciffered<br />

onlir to a sna1l extent (81 .5 anA 85Jí¿). Tn this case it<br />

would hâve ¡nade littIe diffe:.ence if LYS evailabilitl¡ had been<br />

deternined by the gro!,th or the faecal- anelysis nethod (Tab1e 51 ).<br />

The net disappearance of anino acids in the large<br />

intestine !,râs higher for cracked than for finel¡r grounC wheet<br />

(TabLe 51 ). A higher leve1 of undigesteC starch fron cracked


l¡rheat entering the large inteslíne may have allowed for e<br />

higher leve1 of microbial fernentation and amino ecid dís-<br />

16t+<br />

appearance. 0n the other hand, sir,rpl¡r ¡nore nutrients in general<br />

maJ' have been available for microbial ferrnentation.<br />

the results obtained from finel¡r ground and cracked<br />

wheat of stud:.' [b âre compared vrith those of ground wheet from<br />

study l¡a and v¡ith those of cracked t^rheat fron study 2a (Table<br />

5?). Even though different varieties of wheat v,¡ere tested, the<br />

ilea1 amino acid availabilities of cracked wheat fron stuCl: 2a<br />

and 4b conpare very well . The i.leal availabilities of ar¿ino<br />

acíds from ground wheat in studl,' 4a were betÍ,een those o'otained<br />

fror,r finel1, ground and cracked wheat frc¡r study l+b but vrere<br />

closer to those of finel¡"' ground urheat. The conparisons of<br />

results fron studíes 2a anC l¡ shovr the reproducibility of data<br />

as the:.' relate to the t-r'pe of rtpre-processingtr of wheat and to<br />

the methods for determining ileal ar¿ino acid availabilities.<br />

iíoreover, the differences betr.¡een the ilea1 anino acid<br />

availabílities frorc corn, wheet and barle¡r in stuClz 2a v¡ere not<br />

only ¿¡s to the type of cereal grain tested but also to t.he<br />

rianner of rtpre-processingtt to v¡hich each cereal grai-n vras<br />

The ileal ariino aciC availabilities decreased fronr<br />

flour to rvhole wheat to E+S+¡: (Îab1e 53). The LTS availabilities,<br />

in particuler, decreased fron è1r.2 Lo 79.5 to 66.1+.<br />

L¡zsine availabilities fron flour, detern:ined ei-ther by


TABLE 52. Comparisons of ileal and faecal amino acid availabitities fronr wheat from<br />

studies 2a and l¡ as affected by the type of pre_processing.<br />

LOCAT TOI'I<br />

TYPI OF<br />

PR.E- PROCESSTNG<br />

STUDY<br />

A}TÏNO ACTDS<br />

Es se nt i.a 1<br />

ARG<br />

HTS<br />

ÏLE<br />

LXI.I<br />

LYS<br />

PIIE<br />

TIIR<br />

VAT-,<br />

--TÏr_-<br />

llon-Essential<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

I t{1<br />

(/")<br />

4b<br />

86.5<br />

ÒE a<br />

85.6<br />

87 .6<br />

72.6<br />

89 .4<br />

78.0<br />

83 .1<br />

NTIROCEN (il ) 84.7<br />

DRY r,',.AT',1'rR ffi) 76.8<br />

CRÂCI(EI)<br />

2e<br />

85.8<br />

89. r<br />

85.3<br />

ÊÁo<br />

dd a<br />

/o,)<br />

82.8<br />

7t+.5 74.0<br />

7V.3 75.4<br />

9t+.1 92,7<br />

14.4 lJ. /<br />

8¡ . g 8ó.8<br />

84.7 84.1<br />

85.3 85 .9<br />

C, c)<br />

/J.J<br />

]LEUI,T<br />

l*b<br />

92,O<br />

91.1<br />

ont<br />

9L.5<br />

81. 5<br />

92.9<br />

à1 .7<br />

88.6<br />

82.1<br />

oJ.Õ<br />

oà 2<br />

dì .l<br />

dr È<br />

dd ,<br />

89.8<br />

CROUND<br />

4a<br />

87.1<br />

88 .4<br />

ecJ l<br />

Roo<br />

79 .5<br />

9r.5<br />

78,1+<br />

86.7<br />

79.6<br />

80.8<br />

95.6<br />

7 2.6<br />

86.3<br />

89,2<br />

88. lu 85 .2<br />

80.ò 7à.2<br />

4b<br />

93.9<br />

o?Õ<br />

89.9<br />

or 'l<br />

83 .8<br />

oto<br />

87 .3<br />

90.5<br />

Òo.)<br />

97 .6<br />

89. B<br />

96.3<br />

on?<br />

90.6<br />

c]ô1<br />

88.8<br />

CRACKED<br />

2a<br />

92.7<br />

o,, o<br />

89.4<br />

o1 (<br />

80 .7<br />

92.5<br />

86.7<br />

88.9<br />

84.0<br />

83 .1<br />

97.o<br />

89.3<br />

oA,1<br />

Õ, Ã<br />

AoÃ<br />

9r.2<br />

89. o<br />

FABCES<br />

4b<br />

94,tt<br />

94.1+-<br />

9L.2<br />

oro<br />

d-<br />

02Ã<br />

88.7<br />

9t.3<br />

87. r<br />

87.L<br />

97 .8<br />

Õnr<br />

95.9<br />

90.7<br />

93.4<br />

88.8<br />

GROUIID<br />

9t+.6<br />

o?o<br />

9r.6<br />

o?,<br />

86.1<br />

or"<br />

89. r<br />

9r.7<br />

BB.1<br />

88.0<br />

o?o<br />

90.6<br />

96.8<br />

94.)<br />

oro<br />

93 .3<br />

89.4<br />

F c¡.


TÀLLì' 53, Appa¡ent ileåI ¿ûd feecê1 ênino âcid avêi1âblllties, in eddition to nitroE:ên<br />

ånd dry ri;:tte¡ digestibilitics and the disê¡peârance of these substences in<br />

the Lêrge intestine.<br />

Dïra]'<br />

Âriruo ÀctDs (f)<br />

Dssentiâ1<br />

/iRG<br />

H]S<br />

IT,E<br />

L¡U<br />

Ï,YS.<br />

I:EÎ,<br />

PIIE<br />

TIA<br />

vÁL<br />

Non-llssentía1<br />

A5P<br />

cru<br />

CLY<br />

PRC<br />

s¡n<br />

TYN<br />

¡irrRocEN ß )<br />

DNY I:ATTIR II)<br />

FI,OLIN<br />

rLEUìi FA¡cEs L.r.I a,2 rl¿u¡l ¡^Ec,rs L.t.1<br />

87.1<br />

88.4<br />

89.1<br />

89,9<br />

7 .q.5<br />

92. t+<br />

9r.5<br />

78.tt<br />

¿6,7<br />

7c).6<br />

80.8<br />

95.6<br />

72,6<br />

79.r<br />

86.3<br />

89.2<br />

e5,2<br />

7 8.2<br />

9t+.6<br />

93 ,9<br />

9t.6<br />

93.2<br />

86. r<br />

93 .4<br />

9t+.)<br />

89.r<br />

9L.7<br />

d8.I<br />

88.0<br />

97,9<br />

90.6<br />

96.8<br />

94.)<br />

89.1<br />

l{HoLE tlr.rEl\T<br />

56.6 -7 .5 9a.'7 95.<br />

47 ,1, -5.5 93.9 96.<br />

22.9 -2.5 93.9 9t+.<br />

32.7 -3.3 9t*.6 95.<br />

32.2 -6.6 81,.2 86.<br />

L).2 -1.0 93 .? 9).<br />

)2.9 -2.8 95.5 96.<br />

t+9,5 -10.7 85,4 92,<br />

37.6 -5.0 92.7 9!.<br />

52,7 -n.9<br />

4t,.3 -2.7<br />

t3 . r -0,I<br />

16.7 -o.9<br />

11.¿ -r.8<br />

I05,d +o, J<br />

17.8 -o.8<br />

t+7.3 -6.9<br />

2r,9 -7,6<br />

ö4. ö 90. O<br />

78,5 ¡tÊ-É<br />

72.9 j L.6<br />

7.1r.t, iè.2<br />

9!.& 7 5.5<br />

2!.9 tL.) ?r.j<br />

76,0<br />

1*1.7 -8.5<br />

65.7 -r8.0<br />

84,? -l?.?<br />

5t,\ -8.o<br />

3t+.3 -3.7<br />

5L.7 -B,I<br />

57.tr -IL.2<br />

86.1 90.8<br />

85.5 Ê).2<br />

97,9 98.6<br />

7.8.5 9),6<br />

dJ.o 98.5<br />

91.7 95.8<br />

93.7 9)+.4<br />

90,5 96,r+<br />

9o.2 95.o<br />

33.8 -t+.7 7A.2 ? 5.5<br />

25.5 -3.7 69.8 ?5.6<br />

33.3 -A.? 85.8 f,9.9<br />

?a.2 -r5.1 57.3 78,3<br />

9r.2 -r5¿5 ?AJ At.t<br />

t+9.9 -i+.1 72.2 n3.I<br />

18.8 -1.3 71.1 ?8.8<br />

62.r -5.9 69.8 Bo.9<br />

t*9.o -d,I 43.3 65,0<br />

1 Digestibilities of ar¡i¡o acids, nitrogen ãn¿l dr-v mâtter 1¡¡ the lêrge intrestine,<br />

2 Differences betrveen ile¿I end faecãI estim¿tes,<br />

3 Determíned by åcid bydrolysis.<br />

^2<br />

Er S+l<br />

tLDU¡f F^xcEs L.r.l az TLIJUj: FÀ¡cf,s<br />

D.r.SJît (D )<br />

3t+,2<br />

tr7.9<br />

6.3<br />

16.¿<br />

27.r<br />

1S.0<br />

14.6<br />

37.7<br />

I5.2<br />

-5.2 7r.5 9o,2 65.6<br />

-10.1 73.6 88,0 54,5<br />

-r,'t 69.6 7i.5 rg.tl<br />

-r+,3 7L.? 8c.? 3o.r,<br />

-9.1 57.5 ?7,6 t+7.3<br />

-t+.() 76.5 ?3.2 11,+.0<br />

-3.5 ?3.9 St.5 29.r<br />

-17.3 47.ü 7t+.7 5r.5<br />

-t+.7 66.5 ?8.2 3t+.9<br />

17.8<br />

r9.2<br />

28,9<br />

t+9,2<br />

61.6<br />

39.2<br />

25.6<br />

)6.8<br />

3e.3<br />

-5.) 60.7 76.2<br />

-5.6 6r*.2 78.2<br />

-r+.I 61. Â ..a.9<br />

-21.0 11,9 79.3<br />

-r9.2 -t+?.5 78.1<br />

-r0.9 67,7 ¿4.2<br />

-?.7 68.5 ?8.6<br />

-1r..r 59.2 83.0<br />

-27.? 69.2 e) .9<br />

39.9<br />

3r.L<br />

\3.2<br />

69.(<br />

¿5.t+<br />

5r.r<br />

32.r<br />

5e.)<br />

t+7 .?<br />

a.2<br />

-r4.t,<br />

).3 .)<br />

-26.9<br />

-II.7<br />

-r5.5<br />

-14.0<br />

-7 .r<br />

-47,t+<br />

-L?r.e<br />

-to. t<br />

-10.1<br />

¡¿ o\<br />

o\<br />

-7L.7


L67<br />

ileaI or faecal collection, were very sin:ilar. Calhoun et al<br />

(1960), using rats, found the LTS availabilities frorn flour to<br />

be 84.5% and 82.O'fr using weight and carcass nitrogen gain<br />

respectivel.v as the method for measurement. Their estirnates<br />

cornpere verJr well to those found in these experinents,<br />

irrespective of measurenent by ileal or faecal collection.<br />

the relativel;r low LYS availabilitl' 6¡ flour (TabIe 53)<br />

elíminates the notion that LYS availability from cereal grains<br />

is solelir deter¡ained by the amount of LYS present or associated.<br />

with aleurone cells. The relativell' low availability of LTS<br />

frorn flour in relation to the availabilities of the other ar:íno<br />

acids may possibly be due to the large number of lys1r1-pro1¡zl<br />

peptide linkages found in flour. These peptide línkages are<br />

completel¡r resistant to trypsin dÍgestion (page 14 and 15).<br />

Generally, the disappearance of amino acids in the large<br />

intestine increased from flour to whole uheat to E+S+i,l (fable fi).<br />

Tn other word.s, the lower the availabil-ities of amino acids at<br />

the end of the ileum, the nore the faecal availability estinetes<br />

will deviate from the ileal availabilities, ïfith the exception<br />

of THR, the faecal availabilities of the essential amino acids<br />

maj¡ still reflect the ileal availabilities on a qualitative basis<br />

(i.e. the order of least availability).<br />

As was discussed previousl]¡, the ileal availebilities frcm<br />

whole wheat were dependent on the t.vpe of ltpre-processingn. l¡hole<br />

wheat vrâs ground through a 2.AA a¡n screen in this study. If the


¿iheåt had been crackeC then larger Cifferences in anino acid<br />

availabllitj-es betvieen those of vrhole u;heat and flour niê]¡ wefi<br />

have been observed. If the whole wheat had been fineli., gz.ounci<br />

(as in studv 4b), the availabilities obtaineC ;:i6h*" have<br />

approxirnated those of flour (Table 5l and 53). The ileal<br />

availabilities of flour are unlikel1.' to be inpr.oveC b.¡<br />

grinding anC therefore represent naximun values. Flour, as<br />

obtaÍned, was alreadr¡ of a ver:,¡ pohJderl' ccnsisteilcr,'. The<br />

!+S+i.: Ciet vras not ground prior to pelleting. Consecuently,<br />

there nighi be an inprovement in a¡:ino acid availa'oilities<br />

fron F+S+il over those obtained in this study (Table 5j).<br />

i'ihcle rvheat rvas milleC tc gíve 75i: ll-aúr, anC 25i<br />

Ð+S+¡.1. Therefore, the total anj.ount s of the individual anino<br />

acids froa flour (x 0.75) plus those oi E-S+ì,. (x 0.25) should<br />

be eoual to the total'arîount of the individual anino acids<br />

.l_oõ<br />

contained j.n ¡¡hole viheat (x 1.0). The recover;' of the seperate<br />

aa.ino acids fron flour plus E+S+i: ês a percentage of those in<br />

whole wheat ranged fron 9l+.0 to 10L.Ol (:a¡fe 5¿r).<br />

The level of eech anino aciC found in i1ea1 digesta<br />

derived fron 100 grans of whole v;hear- should be ecual_ to that<br />

de:"ived fron 75 grans of flou_r' plus that frari 25 grans of E+S+::.<br />

The latter v,¡ould be the case if no associative or other<br />

unspecifi3d effects occur.<br />

The ileal levels of e¡rino aciCs derived íron lCO grans<br />

of whole wheåt can be calculateC frcn the inCividual anino aciC


ÎAELE 54. The recover]trof anino acids fron E+S+ì.; end flour<br />

(colunn A),-in addirion to the ifeaf aninJ ãJiAavailabi-lities<br />

fron Ë+S+II that were neasurecl<br />

n nr ÎÌt.lÀ1<br />

.À.:IINO ACTÐS (i)<br />

Es s ent ial<br />

._-ffiitj1U<br />

HÏS<br />

LËU<br />

LYS<br />

Dt-'l<br />

TI"R<br />

-vAL<br />

llon-Issential<br />

--ì-fl.i-<br />

À eI]<br />

ctü<br />

GiY<br />

r¡! \.,/<br />

SfR<br />

-L -L -rL<br />

directlT (colunn E) and those of E+S+ii that vüere<br />

calculated b]' Cifference fron crackeC v¡heat and<br />

flour (colun:n C ) and froi,r finell,. ground vrheai<br />

and flour (colunn Ð).<br />

oA.'<br />

104.0<br />

103 .0<br />

102.0<br />

96.0<br />

102.0<br />

oÀô<br />

I00.0<br />

84. I<br />

/ë.)<br />

Ja t)<br />

7 4.t+<br />

66.t+<br />

,71 è<br />

Et l\<br />

I !.)<br />

102.0 70.2<br />

95.o 69.e<br />

102. C 85.8<br />

97.o 57.3<br />

102.0 70.3<br />

103 .0 72.2<br />

9¿*.0 7L.l<br />

ïhe recovery of the individual<br />

E+S+I,: as a percenteFe of those<br />

Q^ ,j<br />

60.7<br />

67 .4<br />

,/.t<br />

AàA<br />

11 n<br />

A^A<br />

rL "'<br />

Ac '1<br />

,70 '2<br />

Aà.<br />

co. /<br />

ar\ )<br />

dE ^<br />

,74 1<br />

È)A<br />

/ l.ó<br />

84.0<br />

70 n<br />

75.4<br />

?c aì<br />

ù6 J<br />

ö / .\<br />

oaa<br />

ò1 t<br />

aräino acids from flour plus<br />

in u¡hol-e wheat.<br />

]69


availabilities and the Cietary leve1s. The ileal levels of<br />

anino acíds derivéd lrom 75 grams of flour can be calculated<br />

in the seríe mánner. The ileal excretion levels fron 2l grans<br />

of E+S+ll are then calculateC by difference from those derived<br />

from lOO grams of whole wheat and ?5 grans cf flour. As the<br />

170<br />

dietar-v level of each a¡:ino acid in E+S+Ì!i is known, the<br />

availability of each amino acid can be cal-culated. These<br />

calculations were carried out using ileal anino acid availabilj.ties<br />

from finel-r' ground and cracked wheat (Table 51 ) in order to<br />

arrive at maximun and minimum possible aruino acid availability<br />

estimåtes respectively from E+S+l{ (Table 54\,<br />

the minimun possible essential ileal- arnino acid<br />

availabilities from E+S+ii ranged from 57,7 far LYS to 8O.?* for<br />

ARG. The maximurn availabj.lities ranged fron 77.8 for LYS to<br />

90.7% for THR (lab1e 54). Therefore, the potential availabilities<br />

of amino acids from E+S+Ì.,Í may approxinate those of whole v;heat<br />

(Tab1e 5l ) .<br />

',¡/ith the exception of ÎHR, GLY and PRO, the directllz<br />

determined amino acid avâilabilities for F+S+li were found to be<br />

between the minumura and maxinum calculated availabilities fron<br />

E+S+¡.':. Threonine , GLY and PRO are Fre sent in relative large<br />

anounts in metabolic protein, e1'en at corrected levels<br />

(rab1e 47, 48 and 49). The directly deterrnined availabilíties<br />

of these three amíno acids were all lower than the calcu.lated<br />

estinates. Fiber l-evel as such has been shown to affect the


I7L<br />

¡ìletabolic ileal a¡nino acid 1evels (ia¡fe ¿*5 ) . The l_e,,,el cf cruCe<br />

fiber of E+S+l: (8.49Í) was ,ruch higher than that of whole wl:eat<br />

(z.l;i\ or.fl-our (C.z5l,). The calculatlons for- the avaílabilities<br />

of E+S+l: were based cn differences betrr,een ileal<br />

amino acid levels fron ¡¡hole wheat and flour anC na-r, have<br />

resulted i"n over: s t imat ion of ileal ava il ab ilit i-e s<br />

o f TIiR , CLï and pp.O.<br />

The calculated availabilities of the other a¡rino aciCs<br />

v¡e¡'e in the râng? of those found directl.¡. This latter would<br />

onl',' occur if the Cilution of '-rnCigested ÍleaI dietar¡., anino<br />

acids b¡r the enCogenous arnino acids (¡'1¡¡ the excer,tion of<br />

!liP., CLY anC PF"C ) was of e r-elatíve1.1¡ sna1l propo:.tion.<br />

In or"de:. to obtain nor"e deta cn the availabilities<br />

of aninc acids fron E+S+l,î (since onlj¡ I sets cf results were<br />

available ), the Ê+S+ì: diet was dil_uted with 6Aí, cornsterch to<br />

give the E+S+i:-D diet. The ileai availabilities oí al_l anino<br />

acicis íron Ê+S+;.:-D r,^,'er e lo¡ier t,hân those of Ë-S=ì- (:aì:ie 53 ) .<br />

lhe availabilities oí .tì"G, tLï and ?RO in per*riculer v¡ere nuch<br />

lower. These a;iino acids a:-e also r¡erl- prci;:i_ne nt in :etabol_ic<br />

íleal pro"'ein (Ta'cle 45 ) .<br />

The higher intake of rhe Ë+S+-:-D diet (Ió49 g/iai,,) than<br />

of the Ë+S-l^ diet (831 S/aa:.) by the pigs coulC have been<br />

p::'tiallir responsible for ihe loiver il-eal- anino acid avai-labilities<br />

cbtained froa E+S+ì:-¡. DietarS' end aetabolic protein r,.¡il_ 1 be<br />

retained for a lon¡"er period of tine in the snall intestine r¡¡hen


-iocd intalie is l- c,nr then when icoci intake is high. lher.eícre ,<br />

v:ì:n int;l:e is 1c:,:, ::icre r,i:e ¡:i11 'co F3rîiitcd fcr ji;=s."icn<br />

end sbsorption oí p:.c'',ein and oth€r nutrients.<br />

Difíerences in i-leal enino aciC er¡ailabiiities anc<br />

nitrogen Cigestlì:il-ities shcul_d. 'ce cie -uectei ií there l.;ere<br />

i'el:'.ive1;' Lar¿.- .,rtirtlc::s in Cletari. intake c;. pigs íes ¡i_e<br />

sa¡:e dieis, The ciietarl. intake cf the pi;s _i:d ¡_S-...-D veried<br />

.frc:r ¿ nin,i:xun cf L)?6 ¡/ o.ey îcr pii nc . 1 t o a ::xiEun ci<br />

134-l ¡o. p j.r nc. !. ihe il-eal nit:.c3en ci-gestibilities r¿:ei-e<br />

aZ.t) ?nd 4e .9,- îor pig no . i ancì ! respec+-ivel;r. Generalli.<br />

sFeal


1n:i;ii',:..1- -"::irc acÍd ¡'.-;ileiiI1'. 1.:s ::n::ì i:.c: l.ã i:r ?-C<br />

lrstcr Qç7) ) fec cc:':: io 15 ',:; p,i.:s, at â :.atc :-î<br />

!.5 .g ;e r .r:; 'cocÌ-. r+eight . <strong>fn</strong> the preseni studies, corn v;:- s ied<br />

to the pigs e" an app;:oxirête Ì'rte ci 27 g Fer l.: r ':cC;' r+eight.<br />

-l-^ ôr.^-^-^ .,'l^-l<br />

^--i-^ ^^.i.ì ^.-^.il-:^ir: _--t i-.: s c¡r¿ined :r- rh:<br />

L/,)<br />

FÌ'esêllt stildi3s uere l-!.6 pei.cenrag: unirs i1*-i¡,;: rl:a:: t::cs:<br />

:':t¿1:rei 'c; :';stcr (Lç:2). ll: dijfe:'enc:s i:: percenrage .;n.i s<br />

Íoi' ihe inci.¿iiual a¡:lino :ciC :-r-ail-¡.tlIities b:tween the tv¿o<br />

s:uiie s ranêird i¡cr. L0.2 io:' ll-ì to 2j.2;', îor C-- (lrtle LI).<br />

-r-J r'r=1 :!: _c:udr (<br />

l:st=i' (!91 )I Ïiâs cri" !..1,1 I cv::r t.e:1 tliet c'c-r:inel 1:r<br />

f iô ê- c+r:.ì i ô <<br />

Tire ileal :nino acii availa'oilities cbtainei ícr<br />

ber1e.,' in 'uhe present studies lrere r,'er]' siril_a.r. tc thcse cbtained<br />

b:. i:Crchls-ie \L?'i) å, . '^\ - r /r^Lr^ ,r \ :<br />

1 i,e.r--- +L t . L:.:l_:.1- '.,;:- s feC tc the<br />

p1¿s et el:1ost ihe se::e rete i:: 'ccth s',-'.:_die s , ::anel-' :t 2: ani<br />

'lC e::err.¡ ii¡d'¡ r',e i,ght in these stuiies anC t;:ose b-,<br />

-J. ¡ -¡:e¡=¡r¡ r,:1''<br />

Frc¡l the data CiscusseC it see::s th.¿t dieterl' intake<br />

(1;: re l-:.tiar tc ioi¡' l:igrt ) :a;' alsc 'ce : fectcr 1:: istsr::-lninî<br />

eninc ecid. ar.'eil-â'cil-itie s et ihe enC cÍ tLe 1t eui:r. .liiíe ¡ences<br />

¡ì:e tc intake r¿.' nct al-'.,ra:'s '¡e detectei, or cni¡. tc e-' Iesser<br />

e:.tJ::t , '..rin êïiïìo âcij al-ail,;'ciliti. s e:e iet:r.:i"nei c-'<br />

+'.ê _'.3ê.1 r-::lr:ci q *¿'i¡J -l.a '=l-f ¡-¡ *¡¡+,¡l.ii^- ,..^.,1.ì<br />

lnd;ca'.e tì::t i::oi'e is relativcl-' ::c:e ',.iåste.î: c-î lrcte:n oi


cÌi.t erl,' end/or r.et-abolic orisln ( causecì 'c:¡ rlcr.cbial fêrien_<br />

tetion) in the lerge intest ine et highe:. then et l-ower fcod<br />

jntakes. Ìhe¡.efore, in certain cases, the large intestine in<br />

adciition to the liver na¡,' also contribute to the ceanination<br />

cf excess protein i.e. *hen protein inlake exceecs the enount<br />

re cuired. The cuestion rxa:,¡ be asked nc.u.r, lvh¡, ¿o." ihe aninal<br />

I7l+<br />

nct êxcrete the excess Fl.otein es such in the faeces? lhe<br />

'b.,'-products of protein netebcl_i,sn in -,,he I arge intestine, .øhich<br />

are nainl¡r short chain vclatil_e fatt;r acids, rla-v still be of<br />

use to the aninal . these conpolrnds na,, be used as precuisors<br />

for glucose or for fat s¡'nthesis. <strong>fn</strong> ed,lition, nicrcbial<br />

fernentation in the large intestine will nake volatile fâtty<br />

aciCs, produced frcn unciigest j-ble carbchydrate sources,<br />

a'i.a ilable to the eninal_.<br />

ihe ileaI a.¡aila'oilit j.es of ani.no acíCs r¿;hich are<br />

relativel.,' high in netabolic ileal protein (Åp,G, GLï a.ni pi.O )<br />

rrere especiallr¡ lcw from Ê+s+l--l in relation to those obtai::eci<br />

froil Ë-S+ì. (iable 53 ). A change in the ra.te cf passage ,urouli<br />

particula'i.' change the avai-labilities o.f anino acics fron<br />

rrotej.n that is alread;". of e relatively low digesti'cilit;,,<br />

such as protei.n iron sloughed-ofi cell_s cr Íi.on trucus.<br />

'-în the other hand, ccÌ.nsterch as such na¡, have be en<br />

responsible for the high levels of netabolic ileal protein<br />

founC at the end of the ileun u:on _feeding of the E+S+1._! ûiet.<br />

-{s for -ihe nâintenance and prot.ein-free Ciets, ilea,l pF;C ani


GLY Ier.els were elso found to be relatively high ín ileal<br />

digesta frorn E+S'i1-D (Tab1e 53 ) . It rnay or rnay not be coincidental<br />

but all these diets containeC óCf cor.nstarch.<br />

L75<br />

Casein was fed (24.3 ne. nitrogen per 100 g body weight)<br />

with ancÌ l¡ithout different carbohydrates (167 r:rg per 100 g<br />

bod5, ws1*¡a) to rats (Euraczev¡skí et aI.,l97Ll . The rate of<br />

stonach er.rptying of casein ou." o".l]"ld when corn dextrín,<br />

glucose, soluble starch, sucrose or Iectose (in ascenciing order )<br />

vrere the carbohyCrate sources. Iiowever, the rate of stonach<br />

emptl/ing of casein rves .increesed when cornstarch v¡as the adcied<br />

cerboh]¡drete source. The euthors releted the differences in<br />

rate of stoaach er:rptying of casein to ciifferences in solubiliti'<br />

end rate of absorpt.íon of the carboh¡rdrates. Possibly, the<br />

increased rate of stonach enpt,l¡ing of casein due to cornstarch<br />

inclusion (v¡hich is very soluble and rapidli.' absorbed ) na¡.'<br />

heve resulted also in an increase in rate of passege of Cig=sta<br />

through the snal1 intestine. As v¡as r¡entioneC previousll',<br />

increased rate of pâssage of digesta through the smalL intestine<br />

na¡r especialll"' ¿""".""e the digestion and reabsorption of<br />

endogenous prote in.<br />

Differential losses of anino acids j-n the large intestine<br />

(due to rcicrobial fermentation) caused by Cifferent types of<br />

carbohl"'d¡¿1es may have sone effect on the nutritional status of<br />

the anínal i.f the diets fed were 1ov¡ ín protein or deficient<br />

in â particular anino acid. The F.E.l..ts (protein efficiency


176<br />

.11'ì<br />

ratiots) Ìrere 0.93', 0.9C' and O.!l¿ when Ciets conte ining Z[fi<br />

wheat gluton and either 6Cfi cornstarch, dextrin cr glucose<br />

respectivell¡ were fed to rats. <strong>fn</strong> the sane ord.er, the p.i.R.rs<br />

.))t<br />

t^rere 1.6L', I.5g' and 1.54' when the diets were supplenentei<br />

with LYS (Chang, tg62),<br />

Although there may be other explanations, the effect<br />

of corns'r"årch (in reration to possi-ble increased rate of pessåge<br />

through the snall intestine ) na¡' þyp1"in the lower p.E.?.. found<br />

when cornstarch rather than dextrin or glucose lvas íncluded in<br />

the non-LYS-suppleniìented v,iheat gluten diets.<br />

it ma5' have been coincidental but true ileal anj,no<br />

acid availabilities fron E+s+¡:-Ð courd be obtained in such a<br />

rcenner thai true PRO and GLY availabilities obtained di.d not<br />

exceed 100f. The availa'oilities of these anino aci-ds were close<br />

to those of the other amino ecids (Table j5). Coffections for<br />

netabolic ileal anrino acid levels were based on equal crude fiber<br />

levels per 100 grails of dry rnatter intake for the E+S+1.:_Ð and<br />

protein-free diets. The crude fiber 1eve1 of Ë+S+::_D 0,e¿f"l<br />

vres very close to that of PF-5 ß.86/"1 . iherefore rnetabolic<br />

ilear anino acid data frorn FF-J were used.. Generall.v speaking,<br />

t,trt,.". 9.f the. glucose- containing diet was significantly<br />

higher than that of the cornstaich containin[ diet. -"<br />

2P.2.p,. rs were not significantly different.


TALLE 55. It'tç -a_pparent ileal amino acid availabiritiesl from Ê+,s+li-D ancl<br />

E*S+-l'ir in addition to the estimated true availabilities from B+S+L-Ð.<br />

DTi!T<br />

AVATLABILTT]ES<br />

Ar,l]No ACTDS (Í)<br />

Bssential<br />

lJì-rne-iIls<br />

lLx<br />

LEU<br />

LÏS<br />

IIET<br />

PTiiJ<br />

1'¡{R<br />

VAL<br />

Iion-Ils senti a 1<br />

--TÏ1-__<br />

^ aÐ<br />

GTU<br />

CLY<br />

PRO<br />

JJiI<br />

lYR<br />

I Ie ans and standard deviation.<br />

.APPARBI'IT<br />

4\:Zi 9't<br />

69.61 1.6<br />

nr<br />

tL. -*" /- L. -t<br />

57.5! 3.9<br />

76.5t 6.o<br />

T,9! r.3<br />

t+7 .8! 3.9<br />

66.5! 2.6<br />

6o.7! 5 .9<br />

6tr.z7 l.l<br />

83 .81 r.6<br />

3r.9+2r.o<br />

-t7.5+66.5<br />

67 .?! 2.8<br />

68.5t 2.6<br />

E+S+11-D<br />

82. L<br />

80. 9<br />

78.2<br />

80.1<br />

69.r<br />

81.6<br />

81 .7<br />

67 .z<br />

75.5<br />

'7t 1<br />

88.7<br />

Ao.<br />

80. 5<br />

1ta<br />

E+.Sr-1.1<br />

APPARììIJT<br />

8/1.8+ r.5<br />

78 .5: 2.6<br />

?2.9+ 2.3<br />

7L.I'! 3,o<br />

66 .t*t ¡r.g<br />

77.8! 3.8<br />

76.O! 2,5<br />

53.e+ 6.5<br />

7r.3! 2,7<br />

7o.z! o.z<br />

69.8+ r.z<br />

85. B:I 1.2<br />

57.3+ 5.9<br />

70.3{11.0<br />

72.2+ 2.r<br />

71.rr I .0<br />

ts<br />

-{<br />

-{


the true ileaI ar¿ino acid availabilities obtained fron<br />

E+S+i:-Ð hrere very close to the apparent availabilities frcn<br />

r78<br />

E+S+¡l fed es such. Indirecth¡, the latter indicates again<br />

that netabolic ilea1 anino acid levels of naturaÌ diets (such<br />

as E+S+l,i and cereal grains ) rnay be overestinated by lþs 115.<br />

of protein-free diets.<br />

the reason that rrtruerr ileaL anrino acid evailaL.ili_<br />

t,ies fror¿ diet E+S+Ì.:-D could be obta.ined na¡r þsgs been due to<br />

the siniLaritíss þst,¡¡sen the E+S+ì.:-Ð and protein-free diets<br />

with respect to certain nutrient(s). Eoth diets contained<br />

6Cl corns'rerch. the reason thet no precise rrtrue!r ileal<br />

enino acid availabilities (or associated ;letabori.c ileal- a¡:ino<br />

acid levels) could be obtained. fro¡: the cereal grains is<br />

probabl:r Cue to the fact that there was nuch l-ess sinilarit..,<br />

betr+een the cereal and protein-free diets. Eecause of the<br />

dj.fferences betv¡een these Ciets, different responses with<br />

regard to the ânounts of endogen ous þrotein secreted end.for<br />

di6ested and reabsorbed in the srnalI intestine urere eliciteC.<br />

Accurate deternination of rrtrue¡r ileal availabiliti.es<br />

is best ii the test and protein-free diets resenbre 3ecli other.<br />

For exanple, in deternining true anino acid availabilities of<br />

a protein source, the composition of semi-purified diet con_<br />

taining this protein source (i.e. at a leve1 of :-OíI) can be<br />

for¡rulated in identical nanner {with the exception of the<br />

protein itself) to that of the protein-free Ciet. iiowever,


in determining true amino acid availabilities of an<br />

energy-protein source (e.g. barle)'), the situation is Cifferent.<br />

I natural type diet will differ in a nu-nber o.f<br />

characterístics from a protein-free diet.<br />

179


SlUÐÏ 3<br />

r80<br />

The apparent availabilities of anino acids fron barle¡,,<br />

corn and Ì¡heat (Tab1e 40) and those of whole wheat, flour and<br />

B+S+ii (Îab1e 53) were found to be higher when they were deter_<br />

nined by faecar analysis than when they were determined by ilea1<br />

analysis. The differences between ireaL and faecal availabilities<br />

were found to be dependent on the type of diet and on the npre-<br />

processingtt condj.tions these di.ets were subjected to prior to<br />

feeding. Differences between ilear and faecal esti-mates were<br />

more pronounced for some than for other anino acids.<br />

The apparent faecal arnino acid availabilities from<br />

sorghurn grain and corn were higher than those obtained at the<br />

end of the ileum fron pigs fitted with ireocaecer re-entrant<br />

cannulae (Easter, Lg72). Generally speaking, apparent amino acid<br />

availabilíties of sEI,l and RSI¡] were higher when they were deter-<br />

mined from faecar collection than when they were determined at<br />

the end of the ileum of pigs fitted, with ileal re-entrent cannulae<br />

(Holnes et a1. , ].g?L). The average a¡rino acid availabilities<br />

based on i1eal sarnples from chicks that were sacrifi.ced<br />

were lower than those determined by faecal analysis (fvy et al .,<br />

1971 ; Filipot et a1. , LSTL; Soares and Kifer, l.gT].). Caecectomy<br />

of chicks significantly reduced the protein digestíbility of<br />

heat-danaged cod protein (l\iesheim and Carpenter, it961).<br />

The anino acid availabilities determined by the faecal<br />

analysis nethod may overestimate the amounts of ami,no acids that


181<br />

are actually absorbed by the animal . Eaeterial enz],nes in the<br />

large intestine brÍng about the hydrorysis of undigested protein<br />

through peptides of decreasing length to free amino acids.<br />

These free amino acids may be elther absorbed as such by the<br />

aninar or they nay be fermented furthe¡ by the nicro-organisms<br />

to yield arnr¿onia and carbon skeletons. The rate of deaminative<br />

fermentati.on varied from anino acid to amino acid (1.|che1 , 1966).<br />

The extent to which amino acid absorption versus dearnination<br />

takes place in the large intestine wÍIl d,eter¡rine which rnethod<br />

is ¡nore valid i.e. the faeeal or ilea1 analysis method.<br />

These experi.ments were carried out to deter¡:ine the<br />

extent to whích IYS was absorbed as such in the large intestine.<br />

Lysine was either caecarry infused as a part of the rsp protein<br />

complex (study 3a) or as free LyS monohydrochloride (stud¡r lb).<br />

Lysine was serected since ít is often the first limiting an:ino<br />

acid to pigs.<br />

The B+2JSP diet is representative of a barley_soybean<br />

pig grower ration. Reducing the tevel of soybean meal by half in<br />

the grower ration will resurt in a decreased. rate of gain by the<br />

pigs. The decreased rate of gain can be largety overcome by aid<br />

of LYS supplementation (Bell , I96ta; Eowland, L)6Zi Braude et aI .,<br />

1972; Nellson et a1 . , 1963).<br />

The levels of LTS that were found in the caecal contents<br />

after infusion of rsP or free LTS v¡ould be nuch higher than those<br />

found under normal conditions. Therefore, a situation was created


whereby there was ample opportunity for substantial LyS<br />

absorþtlon in the hindgut with a resultant improvenent in<br />

tBz<br />

nitrogen retention- rt was reasoned that if only a s¡naII re-<br />

sponse in nitrogen retentíon took place upon LyS infusÍon, then<br />

LYS absorption in the large intestine was of littre ímportance<br />

under normal circumstances.<br />

The amount s of nitrogen retained. per dalr were Ig.O0,<br />

15.80 and 15.91 e. for E+2ïSp, B+TSp and E+fSp+C-lSp respectivellr<br />

(Table 29). In the sane order these values represent !:2.5\,<br />

98.8 and gg.4 g. of protein deposited per day. 0n the assumption<br />

that the average protein content of the pigrs body tissue<br />

is L6%, then the average daily gains would be 703 , 6L7 and, 6Z2<br />

g. for pigs fed E+2ISP, E+fSp and B+fSp+C-fSp respectively.<br />

sinilar calculations ca*ied out on data obtained from study lb<br />

will give the following daily rates of gain: 693, 6OO and 613<br />

g. for B+rsP+Lys, E+rsp and E+rsp+c-Lys respectively. xxcluding<br />

the calculated missing value, an average daily gain oî 607 g.<br />

would be obtained for pígs fed E+ISP+C-LTS (Table 31).<br />

The data obtained from study 3a and jb for B+fSp<br />

compare very well (Table 29 and 3I). The amount of nitrogen<br />

retained per day from B+2ISP was only slightly higher than that<br />

obtained from B+ISP+LTS (Tab1e 29 anð.3I).<br />

Nitrogen retentions and biologícal values were higher<br />

lNit"og"n retained per day times 6.25.


for E+ISP+LYS than for E+lSp (Table 3I). Lysine was the<br />

liniting aruino acid in B+rsP and its addition resulted in rohrer<br />

amounts of the other a¡rino acids that had to be catabolized.<br />

183<br />

Nitrogen retentions and bÍological values for E+2ïSp were lor,rrer<br />

thân those obtained fron B+rsp (Table 29). since onry LTS was<br />

needed for supplenentation (E+fSp+LyS and. E+2fSp gave nearly<br />

similar responses wlth regard to the anount of nitrogen re_<br />

tained per day)r the other araino aci.ds contained in the l unit<br />

of fSP added had to be catabotized.<br />

For efficient protein synthesis, all amino aclds have<br />

to be si¡rultaneously present at the site where protein s]¡nthesis<br />

takes p1ace. ft can be argued that caecally ínfused LyS ma-v<br />

arrive at a different tine at the site of protein synthesis than<br />

the amino aclds from orally ingested proteín. possibty, this<br />

nay occur if the animals were fed once daily and the infusion<br />

had been carried out r.2 hrs. later. However, in these studies,<br />

the pigs were fed J tirnes daily and the ínfusions were pe'forined<br />

when the ani.mals were offered their ¡neaLs.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> study 3b, LYS was nÍxed with cornstarch to facilitate<br />

Lïs infusion Ínto the caecum. The caecally infused cornstarch<br />

rnay have stimulated bacterial activity, resulting in an increase<br />

i-n deamination of anrino acids (incruding caecally infused Lys).<br />

In retrospect, LTS should perhaps have been nixed with a fiber<br />

source from which energy is less availabre to bacteria than is<br />

the case with cornstarch.


The results obtained in these studi-es show that<br />

r84<br />

caecally supplied LYS did not inrprove the nutritfonal status<br />

of the animal . The amounts of nitrogen retained per day were<br />

nearly the sa¡ne for E+ISP, E+fSp+C-ISp and B+ISP+C_LYS.<br />

However, a small âmount of LTS absorption may have taken place<br />

in the large intestine of the pig. Slade et g!. (192I) showed<br />

that there was LYS absorption from the large intestine of the<br />

horse. However, the authorst did not measure the magnitude of<br />

LYS absorption (page 26 ).<br />

ïn surnnary, LTS availability determined by the faecal<br />

analysis ¡rethod overestimates the actual anount of LTS that is<br />

available for utj.lizatlon by the pig. There is no reason to<br />

asslxne that the othe¡ amino acids undergo a different fate from<br />

IYS (in relation to deamination and excretion of ammonia as<br />

urea in the urine) in the large intestine.


STUDT ]<br />

The amino acid cornposition of bran and endosperm<br />

a85<br />

fron high end lovr protein wheat fron stud;r I and that of bran<br />

(E+S+ll) and endospern (flour ) fron stud]' 4a are conpared in<br />

Tab1e 56. Aleurone protein contains reletivelj, high 1e.,re1s<br />

of ARG and LYS and relativel¡r 1or levels of GL'ú anC pF.O in<br />

relation to endospern protein (Tab1e 2). Therefo:.e, the<br />

efficiencl' of separation of aleurone anC endospern protein<br />

cen be measured b¡r the degree of difference in the ccnposition<br />

of these amino acids between the bran and endosper¡n fractions.<br />

As shown in Table 56, a better separation of bran<br />

and endosperm protein was achieved b5' the conventional nilling<br />

procesè (stud:¡ 4e) than by pearling (studl' l) of ,¡heat. This<br />

v¡as also reflected b), the verv low crude fiber content (o.25îi)<br />

of the endosperm (flour) fraction obtained in stud¡,- {¿.<br />

The separation of aleurone Frotein frora endosFern<br />

protein was n:uch better for the 1ow than for the high protein<br />

r^rheat (Tab1e 56) . <strong>fn</strong> ret.rcspect, abrasion should have been<br />

carried out for a longer period of time for. the high protein<br />

wheat, namel¡r for 36 instead of 2C seconds (T¡,ble 5). Therafor"e,<br />

e substantial anount of aleurone protein ma1,, have renaineC in<br />

the endospern fraction, resulting in ress distinct differences<br />

ín the ar:ino acid conposit,ion of ARC, CLy, GLi end pF,C between<br />

bran anC endosperra protein, Consecuentll', int erpre -.t.at i-on o-f<br />

anino aciC availabilities frcr: bran and endosperm fron the high


TA¡LE 5ó. The amino acid compositionl and crude fiber content. of bran and<br />

endosperm from studl. 1 and studl' lu¿.<br />

}.IU¡ÍBER OF STUÐY<br />

F'R¡.CTÏON OF<br />

C]IRBAL GIìA]N<br />

A}|]NO ACTDS<br />

Es sent ial<br />

--Ãrõ--<br />

HÏS<br />

ItE<br />

LÛU<br />

LYS<br />

PH[<br />

TI'IR<br />

VAL<br />

llon-lìssenti a1<br />

-.TrÃ.-._<br />

/\ cD<br />

CLU<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

J.!,.t1-<br />

TYR<br />

CRUD]J FIBER (ii)<br />

I t<br />

a<br />

I,<br />

4.86<br />

1.83<br />

2.9t,<br />

6,Lt+<br />

2.3 5<br />

4.1+4<br />

2.86<br />

4.01<br />

t+.r4<br />

E aa<br />

30.04<br />

l+ .7 I+<br />

ô ô,.<br />

4.48<br />

t ót.<br />

E ò,<br />

3 .81<br />

r.93<br />

3 .40<br />

7 .2r<br />

2.It<br />

5.rO<br />

2.t+o<br />

4.16<br />

1,


L87<br />

proteÍn krheat variety in relation to anino acid availabilities<br />

fron aleurone and endosperm protein should be considereC<br />

¡ ¡ v.o 1:r-l I r¡<br />

The apparent faecal enino ecid availabilities obtained<br />

from pigs fed r¿¡heat in study 4a and those fro¡i pigs fed vrheat<br />

in study 2 are compared with those obtained fron the rats,<br />

fed high end low protein wheat, in this stud,y (Tabl_e 57).<br />

lÍith the exception of the availabil-ities obtained<br />

frora 1ow protein wheat (11 .2i) fed to rats, the availabilities<br />

coapere reasonably well betv;een rats and pigs especialI1,, those<br />

obtained from pigs fron study 2 and those from rats fed high<br />

pro'r,ein vrheat ( Tabl e 57 ) . The differences betvreen faecal<br />

availabilities varied only from 0.3 for SEn to 2.f percentage<br />

units for ASP between these 2 studies. Ìt na;' have been a<br />

coinciden-ual- observation but the sane varietlr of wheat, nar.,e1¡r<br />

Glenlea, vres tested. <strong>fn</strong> addition, the protein contents of<br />

both C1enlea wheat sources were re1ativel.,. sinilar (Tab1e 5?).<br />

The differences between faecal availabilities were<br />

sonewhat larger when those from rats fed high protein wheat and<br />

t.hose obtained from the pigs from stud¡,, 4a were compâred, The<br />

differences ranged from 0.3 for PFiË to ?.Zf for l,ïS (TaL,Ie 57).<br />

ihe wheat sources in this compari-son, although not too Cifferent<br />

in protein contenl , h¡ere of a different varietl/.<br />

The faecal anino acid availabilities obtaineci frcn<br />

rats fed the f.ow protein v¡heat v¡ere lower than those obteined


I'AFL¿ 57. Cornparisons of apparent faecal a¡nino acid avaitabilities, in addition<br />

to nitrogen and dry måtter digestibilities, of wheat and'barley fed<br />

to pigs and rats.<br />

CER]IAI, CRAI}I<br />

LBVjIL OF<br />

PROTETN ('I)<br />

AI'IÏI.iAL SPiJCÏES<br />

A¡IINO ACIDS (/, )<br />

Essential<br />

Ãilo<br />

IITS<br />

]LE<br />

LEU<br />

LYS<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VÂL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

-Âïã--<br />

ASP<br />

G],U<br />

GI,Y<br />

Pn0<br />

SER<br />

1'YR<br />

ilrrnocrN (i!)<br />

DiìY r:ArTrn (l)<br />

I<br />

2<br />

)<br />

L5 .INI<br />

PIGS<br />

9l+.6<br />

ô? o<br />

9r.6<br />

93.2<br />

86.]_<br />

91.3<br />

89.1<br />

9L.7<br />

88.1<br />

88.0<br />

o?o<br />

90.6<br />

96.8<br />

9t+.3<br />

or o<br />

o? 2<br />

e9.L<br />

L6 f2<br />

PICS<br />

92.4<br />

9l+ .5<br />

Ao,<br />

9L.l*<br />

80. 3<br />

atA<br />

86.t+<br />

dd d<br />

83.6<br />

82.9<br />

97.0<br />

89. t<br />

96.9<br />

92.3<br />

82.5<br />

9r.2<br />

dd d<br />

!fIIEAT<br />

r8;3<br />

R,ÀTS<br />

tr,23<br />

RATS<br />

-ta o2<br />

PICS<br />

9L.2 87.8 88.4 82.3<br />

93 .7 90.8 89.9 87 .6<br />

90.4 85.3 81.3 79 .o<br />

92.7 89.4 85.t+ 82.5<br />

78.9 73 .t+ 7 5.5 67 .7<br />

94.O 90.8 87.L 86.0<br />

8ó. B 81.9 79.9 76.0<br />

9o.t+ 86.3 82.7 82.0<br />

85 ,z 80.9 76.1 73 .2<br />

85.3 79.r 76.3 72.8<br />

97.1, 95,7 92.r 89.8<br />

89. B 84.8 8r.2 76.0<br />

97 .3. 95.9 9r.7 9o.5<br />

92.6 89.t+ 85.6 82.8<br />

9r,8 85.6 83.8 B2.B<br />

89.7 84.1* 84.0 ?8.7<br />

90.3 88.8 82.7 83.7<br />

Da t a f rom stud.,r' l+a .<br />

Data from studl' 2: averåge of cannulated and non-cannulated pigs.<br />

Data from s l,udy 1 .<br />

DARLEÏ<br />

1r .43<br />

NATS<br />

çr q3<br />

RATS<br />

78.0<br />

70.6<br />

77 .3<br />

ó0.1<br />

78.6<br />

67 .8<br />

73.7<br />

67 .o<br />

6l .z<br />

84.1<br />

70.o<br />

83.6<br />

7l+.2<br />

na ù<br />

83.5<br />

F<br />

00<br />

@.


fror,r the rats fed the high protein wheat and the differences<br />

189<br />

ranged from 6.2 for iYä. and ASP to I.4l for pRC (Teble 5Z).<br />

For barley, the faecal availabilities for pigs frcn<br />

study 2 and those obtained from the rets fed the high protein<br />

þarrey do not conpâre too unfavourably. The differences rangeci<br />

fro¡n 0.7 for VA.L to 7.8fr for LyS (ïable 57). The barley source<br />

fed to the pigs was of the i-ierta variety while the high protein<br />

barley fed to the rats was of the Fergus varietl'. <strong>fn</strong> the sane<br />

order, the protein contents of these barley sources were 13.9<br />

and LL 4fr respeet j-vely.<br />

ïhe feecal amino acid availabilities fron rats fed<br />

the low protein barley soLlrce (8.5É protein) were rnuch Lower<br />

than those obtained fron pigs fed barlel' ,13.9í¿ proteín) in<br />

study 2 (Table 57). The differences rangeC from g.O fo¡. GL-uto<br />

15,4i¿ for LYS. Even though these barley sources vrere of the<br />

sane variety ( äerta ) , the¡, differed narkedl;,' r.rith regard to<br />

their. levels of protein. f!ì contrest , the Z sources of Glenlea<br />

wheat, thet viere fed to rats (18.31 protein) and pigs Oe ,3X<br />

protein) and resulted. i.n very siniler faecal a.railabiliti,<br />

estir:ates, were almost sinilar in protein content.<br />

The faecel amino acid availabilitíes fron rats fed. the<br />

high proteln barle-rr were higher than those obtained fron lot^¡<br />

protein barley (as for híg}: and 1ov,r protein wheat ). The dif-<br />

ferences rangeC fron 5.2 for LiL: to 8.6f for Sii. (Table 57).<br />

Generally speaking, faecal anino acid availabilities


ton<br />

frcl c:rcal- :i.alns iei to rats ani :i-s co:¡¡:-e reascna.ci.. .1.;.: Il_<br />

i-i c=rael ::'alns cc::t::ui"ng :r:l:c>:Í::etql'. si:ir a:- ::ctein ccniî:.t<br />

ât': ic: '-c ¿o:h s:--^cies. l¿=cel :..-.:ir:'cil._tl¡s ::a,. ccri".a:"3<br />

.1-:n ll3ttet' iÎ in aicitlon to ecual ci.ciein ccnt:nt the sarie<br />

i¡rr i,:f .¡ i c ¡â.l-ê-ì<br />

- :'r-"r. 1l 1^^ '<br />

, / j ) co:.?a:oi :ê3:al ?:::ta :c:a e',.âi1e-<br />

;\il-itie s lr=t-rilen ;:ars a:li ii¡-s lh.êt ',;:r:: i:.-., the sar:e soLi.t,c=s<br />

c-f '.';heat ând 'aêrlÊ.'. Ìhe e :t:cr. j::e nis c:. plls ê:il râts ,..jêt e<br />

ca::'i:d c'-:t :r:i:-: sir:il_a.r ::ç:.,.r:rentai c:::citi.o::s. icr r..:hea:_,<br />

ieecel a¡:lnc acid er;eila'cil-ities c'ltainei i:.c;r 'l:iqs ,".;erê sligh-ti;<br />

hi.-l:::' th:.:: tics: Í:c: :.ets, lh: dllfcie::cc -.'i:.:3: f;,oi: 4.î<br />

for LIS to C.2i" for li-lì 3nC iiis. lc:. la:L:-,, íaecai a¡:ino aciC<br />

¡'¡ail-a'cil-it tes c'.:ta.ined frcn t âts ./re:.î s1i-i:t1:. h"igh.:r than<br />

-ul--c se c'ctaiä€i jJ'c:1 pir:s and r.':ried jrc:.1 l.) îcr S_i lo C.l,¡<br />

f o: J-¡- . .',itl.cu.-h -g;ur. (l?71 ) jo':::d sc::e ii jl:r:nces 'c:tr.;=e :: p:_:s<br />

:i:i i':ts, tì:.,se clf.ie rences enc those c'ct¿ineC irc::: othe r cereal_<br />

¡r':i:ls ',;er: ¡i a s;:e1l- :'la¿;:i:.-r:e. lil ¡:::e :ai, r-:i_s ani;its<br />

-c-. '-.: :¡:'r'l l -: .ìc.,l r-¡ l-)"^ i,¿r= .i u- ^+^'*r Ldr::.rI:= -^!.i . -o:: -* ci faec:i_ ,,:i::c :-cll<br />

._-.i ¡^1ì ri!i.- __ -.^^-J..-<br />

:er:e_ .ire::ls.<br />

^ t ^,,-^*-.<br />

ìi ill'cgen digestibilltl' r,,;: s inc;'e:s-=e r.rith<br />

ccnterÌi cí di-i.fe¡':::i b:i'ie-.. sc-it-c3s i:i -,c<br />

!>,:.> ) . jll',tler cì's=i.;ai j-cns ì/..31 : :ale :r<br />

; cr l:i;;: s:li l-olr p:ct:::: 'ia:i:;r ,:r' -..:i""¿:<br />

pcstili-.."3i tc b: iue "'- c the iccr¡ase i:r<br />

---^+^¡ ^ l^^ ^ , ^:-


protein content of e cereel grain (see Fegê l-Z). Iìovrever,<br />

r9r<br />

ås t4re s shown in these studies (Teble 15 and 16), the nitrcgen<br />

digestibilitÏ (and ar,rino aciC availabilítíes ) fron endospern<br />

fronr high protei-n barle¡, (or r"¡heat ) v¡as also higher than thet<br />

obtained fron endosperm protein fron 1or.¡ protein ba:.1e.v (or<br />

wheat ). Therefore, in addition to en incree.se in the relative<br />

enount of aleurone protein there seems to be an increase in the<br />

anount of undiqestible protein from endospern (or flour) fron<br />

cereal grains as the protein content d.e creases (i.e. the overall<br />

protein digestibility is affecred).<br />

Ïn c oi'::pari-ng the data obtained fron rats ¿nd pigs it<br />

should be. kept in nind that there were diff=rences in the<br />

physicar treetnent of the cereal grains prior to feeding. iìor"¡-<br />

ever, as y¡e.s shown ín studi' l¡b, physical treatnent oí a cere¿l<br />

grain p:.ior to feeding haC only a ninor efiect, on anino acid<br />

availabilities es the¡' u'ere neasureC bi' the íaecal anâlj.s:s<br />

ro+l^aÄ<br />

f:L ir¡e ^<br />

e^+,^^;<br />

r:re ulods used for deterninir:g faeca.t ani::o acio<br />

availabilities fron rats and pigs rvere cuite different. ihe<br />

anino acid availabílities obtained fro¡r the pig lrere deternined<br />

by aid of the chronic oxide ¡:ethoci (Crarnpton and Ilarris , 1969).<br />

The amino e.cid availabilities obtained froi rats were deternineci<br />

by total faecal collection from feeding the *uest diets du:.ing<br />

a period cf l¡ consecutive cÌa;,'s. <strong>fn</strong>clusion of fer¡,ic oxiae in<br />

the basi-c ciiet (r¡hicl: v;as fed Frior to and fo1lor,¡ing the test


g2<br />

periods ) pernitteC somev;hat easier id en-uif i cation anci collection<br />

of faeces resulting fron the test diets. lioi,¡ever r a gradual<br />

colou-r change is usually observec íron red to that of *"he colou¡.<br />

of the faeces from the test diets. Ìo a certain extent, the<br />

anount of faeces çolleited r¡riIl be dependent on the colour<br />

appraisal by the inCividual collecting the faeces. Therefcre,<br />

this nethod íor ccllecting faeces is sonel¡hat sub,{ectiïe.<br />

Due to the r:roCif;ring action of the microflora of the<br />

J-arge intestine, data obtained fron studie s 2,3 and { inciicate<br />

that appârent ilea1 anino aciC avaílabilitj.es are a L-to Ì.e âc_<br />

curate ¡nea sure!:ent than apparent faecal a¡.¡ailabil_iti e s . lhe<br />

differences betl'¡een i-1ea1 and faecal anino acid availabirities<br />

varied from anino ecid to an:ino acid. ?ne differences were<br />

also found to be dietar¡' depenCent anci vrere also affected by<br />

the physical treatnent of the cereal gi'ain prior to feeding,<br />

For the essential anino acicÌs fron wheat i:i study 2a, the Cifferences<br />

betv¡een iIeal end faecel anino aciC, availabilities<br />

t^¡ere founC to -ì.e the lergest for TIiR, nanellr l-A.Z;:, an.d the<br />

snellest 9or ì-ìT, nanel. 2 J',:, eabL" t+O). Fo:' stud5, t¡a,<br />

the differences varieC from 1O.Zíj for îFl? to 1.0,,i for ,..,î<br />

(Table 53). The differences bet,¡een ileal and faecal ani-no acid.<br />

e,¡åil¡1bilitie s for ,¡heat fron studl: !¿ ancj. l+a Ì..¡ere nor€ oi, le ss<br />

the sane for each ar:ino acid. Therefore, the everege differences<br />

u¡ere used for arriving at estinated i.leal a¡:ino aci-c avai.labilities<br />

(by subtraction fron the faecal availabir íties) for the rats fed


the high enC lov¡ protein wheet sources (Table 53).;<br />

For bar"le¡r fed to pigs in stud.1.. 2a, the d.ifferences<br />

betv¡een ileal and faecal essential ar¿ino acid a-¡airabirities<br />

varieC fron 11.5 for IlfS to 0.5É for LET. These Cifferences<br />

were useC for a¡'riving at estinated ileal aninc acid<br />

availabilities for the rats feC the 2 barle;r sources<br />

The changes fron faecal to ileal anino aciC<br />

bilities for the rets tend to ¡nake LyS and îHp, about<br />

the least ar,'ai't able essential a¡nino acid (Table 5g ) .<br />

ïn general, the magnitude of the differences in<br />

Fercentage units of faecar anino acic availabilities betr¡een<br />

r93<br />

encospern: and bran decreased fron those obtained fron the v¡heat<br />

scurce fed to the pígs (studi. 4a) to those obtained fron the<br />

lovr protein wheat source end to those obteined fron the hÍgh<br />

protsin wheai sou-rce fed to rats in thís stucy (ia¡re 5g). rn<br />

the san:e ord.er, the a.,,erage Cifferences betrveen faecel enCosperrn<br />

end bran anino aciC availabilities were I).9, 6.g and ll.3<br />

percentage units respectivel:/. These differ3nces na¡., b¿ ¡¿"-<br />

tia11¡r explained b¡r the less efficient separation o.f aleurone<br />

and endospern protein fror: rvheat fed to the rats (especiall¡,<br />

that of high protein Hheat ) than fron roheat fed to the pigs<br />

( Table 56 ) . r-n add ition, t he bran Ciets f eC to the rêt s r,,,ere<br />

grounc thr"ough a 2.oo rßm screen prior to prepai'ation of cru:nbres.<br />

The bran fraction fed to pig;s v;as not Eround prior tc beirìg<br />

pelleted and fed. I'lorn¡ever, it should be kept in nini that<br />

(ra¡te 4o ).<br />

^-,-¡1^<br />

e c-uel ! I'


TAELii 58. Comparisons of .the apparent -i1eaf amino acid<br />

to<br />

availabilities, in adcÌition<br />

nitro€ien and drr¡ mãtter digestibilities of vrheat --'<br />

pigs<br />

and bariey feA<br />

and-the<br />

io<br />

esti¡näted íleal lalues for ratã.<br />

CIRBAL GRATI\J<br />

LEVIIL OF<br />

PROTEIN (%)<br />

A¡ITIiAL SPIICIËS<br />

A¡.irNO ACrDs (i¿)<br />

Essential<br />

ÃEe<br />

IJ I' Cì<br />

ïL jj<br />

LNU<br />

LYS<br />

P¡.IE<br />

TiIR<br />

VAL<br />

lìon-.lis sential<br />

ALA<br />

^ eD<br />

CLU<br />

I¡L.L<br />

Pn0<br />

o.uif.<br />

lYR<br />

rirrRccEN (i3 )<br />

DRY I;ATTDR (iJ)<br />

I<br />

2<br />

3<br />

r5.41<br />

Ptcs<br />

B7.I<br />

88.4<br />

89.1<br />

Qoo<br />

79 ,5<br />

9r.5<br />

7B, t+<br />

86.7<br />

79.6<br />

80.8<br />

o< Á<br />

/ ¿,c<br />

ðo. J<br />

89.2<br />

85.2<br />

78.2<br />

Data from study 4a.<br />

Date fron stucl¡r l¿.<br />

Estimat.ed data from studv I.<br />

16 J2<br />

PTGS<br />

I/HJìAT<br />

r o r3<br />

RATS<br />

LI.23<br />

RÂTS<br />

13.92<br />

PÏGS<br />

BARL]LY<br />

I:-.43<br />

RATS<br />

8.53<br />

RATS<br />

q2.9 q4.0 qo.6 81.5 71+.t+ 66.5<br />

qe.r<br />

qtJ 88.0 q5.r so.i ià:í 66'.t<br />

\z.t È,2.o 7g.i 75.0 66-.6<br />

99-? 8t.?. 91.t, 8í.t 77.u 7z.z<br />

71.7. 73 .6 q8.1 73 .3 63 . i tt-.õ<br />

9q. 8 eq.7 87 .5 sî.i so:i iá:'s<br />

26.2 82.8<br />

7.6.3<br />

8tr.3<br />

7.L.tr ?i.à 6t'.'S i?.é -6i'.1<br />

eo.z 7s.o 7i.i<br />

7+.o 75.9 7L.ç 69.7 65.5 5s.3<br />

7 5 .\ 'i7 .8 7r.6 ?L.z 66.i 6'o.i<br />

2?.7 et+.r 92.4 86.6 ú.i is-.6<br />

73^.2 72.? q8.q 7r.2 6tr.6 is.6<br />

qt.+ ::,.y 12.¿ q|.L<br />

q2.t<br />

ql.2<br />

Bg.C 79,r iz.z<br />

76.3 ?2.2 63.6<br />

85.9 88.1 81.9 ?9.1 Zi.S 6:9:ú<br />

9?-9 8\., 76.2 7L.s 72.7 61.6<br />

73.3 76.8 75.3 66.2 66.1, 66.á<br />

F<br />

\o


T'ABLE 59' comparison of faecal antÍno acid availabilities from bran and enclosperm<br />

from wheat fed to pigs and rats.<br />

ÂN]¡iAI, SPECTES<br />

FRAOTTOI!<br />

AUtr,Jo ltcrDS (i3 )<br />

Es sential<br />

ÂnG<br />

HIS<br />

rLli<br />

T;ITT<br />

LYS<br />

P}fE<br />

TIIR<br />

VAL<br />

lì on- !s senti-sl<br />

-1TÃ_+_<br />

ÂsP<br />

CLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

OFD<br />

TYiì,<br />

¡,VJRACE (i3 )<br />

1<br />

)<br />

l+<br />

ETTDO-<br />

SP¡JRII<br />

95.6<br />

96.6<br />

9l+,7<br />

95.5<br />

86.0<br />

96.3<br />

o, 2<br />

9t+.3<br />

90.8<br />

B9.z<br />

od Á.<br />

93.6<br />

98.5<br />

cià d<br />

94.4<br />

94.2<br />

90.0<br />

88.0<br />

7 tr.6<br />

,i çI 1<br />

?ô Ã<br />

7r.3<br />

76.O<br />

).o<br />

.7d<br />

2a.I<br />

1ó.8<br />

10. 5<br />

16.8<br />

2L.A<br />

18.3<br />

75.5 L5.3<br />

7 5.5 13 .6<br />

89.9 à.7<br />

78.3 l-5.3<br />

8.9 .5 9 .0<br />

Bl .1 12.7<br />

2à d 1É I<br />

, v. (J L).\)<br />

Bo.l l.3.9<br />

o, o<br />

9l+.6<br />

92.8<br />

9t+.3<br />

Qta<br />

95.4.<br />

89.7<br />

at 'J<br />

88.0<br />

9E.0<br />

O))<br />

98.0<br />

9tt.U<br />

Õ?2<br />

92.4<br />

ot t.<br />

93.L<br />

8z.o<br />

89. B<br />

76.9<br />

9L.7<br />

óJ.O<br />

lndosperm and bran indicate flour and Lr's+rìÍ respectj-very from study da.<br />

EncÌospern and bran obtained from high protein wheat from stud' r.<br />

Endospern and bran obtained from 1ow protein vrheat fron study l.<br />

colurins A, F and c indicate the dífference i.n percentage unÍts between enclospern and bran.<br />

à2, t,<br />

82.5<br />

96.0<br />

8ó.0<br />

95.5<br />

89. r<br />

BB.l*<br />

ë,tJ. -L<br />

o.5<br />

T,5<br />

Ê(}<br />

5.3<br />

5.r<br />

5.6<br />

2.O<br />

AA<br />

'E<br />

lr.9<br />

lt.3<br />

QDI]DIÌ<br />

88.7<br />

9r.9<br />

88.1<br />

91.0<br />

92.2<br />

öt. I<br />

88.6<br />

ç¡ì .<br />

Ba.5<br />

96.5<br />

dÁ. d<br />

96.8<br />

90.7<br />

87 .4<br />

B7 .8<br />

¡1]{ L)<br />

87.B<br />

B7 .9<br />

8¡ .0<br />

7r,4<br />

8r*. S<br />

7 t+.9<br />

80.7<br />

75.8<br />

7l+ .L<br />

9r.0<br />

89. o<br />

Òa^<br />

78.r<br />

8l-.0<br />

0.9<br />

4.0<br />

r0.l*<br />

8.0<br />

)^<br />

7.4<br />

êd<br />

6.1+<br />

5.5<br />

7.8<br />

dn<br />

9.3<br />

6.8<br />

H<br />

\o


L96<br />

cifferences in a¡rino acid availabilities due to ,pre-processin¿rr<br />

na¡r be pa:"tiall¡r eliminated bJ' the nicr oflora of the large<br />

intestine (es was shown in stud¡,' l¡b). A1so, the nethoC used<br />

^.<br />

1'or deternining feecal amino acid availebiÌities in the rêt<br />

studies was of a somewhat subjecti,re nature. The degree of<br />

error that can be connitted will depend on the total. bu.lk of<br />

faeces thet is collected. The latter depends on the dail¡.,<br />

dietar'-t" intalce, the dr¡,' netter digestibilit,l, end the length of<br />

tine a particu.lar test diet is fed. Therefore, in the r.at<br />

experinents one rita:¡ expect a I ar.ge:. er.ror fo/ endosperm then<br />

when bran is fed for the endosperm fraction has a nuch highe:"<br />

dr:/ ti:tatter Cigestibility than bran. Conceivebl¡i, faecal a;::ino<br />

aciC avails-lilítie s fron endospern fed to ret s :a¡., ha.re been<br />

rr¡Äarac+iac+¡zl<br />

As v¡as pointed out in the discussion pa:.t of stuCies<br />

2 and !, the u.se of protein-free diets for cat culatins true<br />

a¡:ino acid ar¡a ila'cirit ie s from cereal grains r:ay give nisleading<br />

values especially if true avail"abil-ities are cieternined b}' the<br />

faecal anall,5is netl:oci. The deternination of çpparen-" ieecal<br />

an:ino acici availabilities fron cereal grains ;rå)¡ heïe sone<br />

value. -i;ith the exception of îF.R, apperent ileal end feecal<br />

availabilities of essential anino acicis fro:r cereal grains io<br />

not difíer thet nuch especially if the greins vrere íineli, tround<br />

prior to feeciing. ConsequentlJ/, t ï',;e faecal arino aciC<br />

availabiiities from cereel grains fed -uo rrts have not been<br />

d.eternined.


SUI.4MARY<br />

The apparent ileal and faecal amino acid<br />

'ì o?<br />

avaiLabilit,ies fron corn, wheat and barley were deter¡ríned vrith<br />

6 growing tr4anagra barrows.<br />

Lysine was the Least available indispensable amíno<br />

acid when determined by the faecal analysis method, namely g1 .0,<br />

80.7 and 77.5y'" tor corn, wheat and barley respectivery. LysÍne<br />

and THR vrere approxinately equally the 1east available indispen_<br />

sable arnino acíds when deternined at the end of the iler¡n. The<br />

ileal LYS availabilities were gZ.O, 75.2 and 73.1/o îor corn,<br />

wheat and barley respectively. In the same order, they were<br />

78.9, 76.5 and 7l.2dc for THR. TLre apparent ilear availabiriti.es<br />

of MET were 91.9, 86.6 and BO.b/" for corn, wheat and barley<br />

respectively and were essentía11y sinilar to their faecal<br />

availabilitie s .<br />

The, apparent availabilities of tyS especially, and also<br />

those of lHR and MET, are of importance since these amino acids<br />

are present in limiting anounts in cereal grains. Generally<br />

speaking, the faecal analysis nethod is valid for determining<br />

the apparent availabÍlitíes of r,rs and MET. However, the faecal<br />

analysís nethod overestinates the availability of THR due to<br />

its relatively large disappearance i.n the large intestine.<br />

Tryptophan is also present in linited ¡nounts in cereal grains,<br />

especially in corn, and its ilea1 avai.lability should be assessed<br />

in future research.


The average amino acid dísappearance in the large<br />

'r oA<br />

inte sti'ne (as a percentage of amino acid Íntake ) increased fron<br />

corn to wheat to barley ând !¡a s 2.5, 5.3 and 6.0/o respectively<br />

for the índispensable amino aci.ds and 6.3, g.5 and g.g/"<br />

respectívely for the dispensable anino acids. For the indi_<br />

spensable acids, ARC, HIS and THR disappeared to the greatest<br />

extent. For the dispensable amino acids, d.isappearance vÍas nost<br />

marked for GLI and pRO.<br />

A separate study h¡a s carried out to detern¡ine if<br />

apparent faecal amino acid availabilities from cannulated pigs<br />

were representative of those that would be obtained from non-<br />

cannulated pigs. Essentialry no di_fferences v¡ere found between<br />

normal and cannuleted pigs fed the sane sources of corn, wheat<br />

and barley.<br />

the differences that were found between ileal and<br />

faecal amino aeid availabilities frorn corn, wheat and. barrev<br />

nay have been partially confounded by the type of physical<br />

treatnent each ce¡eal grain r*a s subjected to prior to feeding.<br />

1!ro dì.ets, nanely finely ground and cracked wheat, were fed<br />

each to 4 finishing pigs. The ileal availabilitÍes of all amino<br />

acids were higher frcin finely ground than fro¡c c¡acked wheat.<br />

The differences in pereentage units ranged fro¡n g,9% for LyS to<br />

0.7/" îor PRO. the iLeal availabÍlities of a¡nino acids, assoc_<br />

iated with or contained in retatively rarge anounts i.n aleurone<br />

cells (such as rrs and ALA), were increased the most upon fine


grinding. Those amino acids, associated or contained in<br />

10ô<br />

relativeLy 1ow amounts in areurone celrs (such as cLU and pHE),<br />

were increased the least upon fine. grinding. Dif.ferences in<br />

anino acid availabÍlities due to physical treatnent of wheat<br />

prior to feeding could hardly be detected by faecal analysis.<br />

More research as to the irnprovenent of amino acid availabilÍties<br />

upon finer grinding (and other dietary components such as starch)<br />

may be warranted for such cereal grains as barley or oats.<br />

Bar1ey and oats contain relatively more aleurone protein (as a<br />

/" of total- protein) than wheat or corn.<br />

The ilea1 and faecal_ anino acid availabilities from<br />

whole wheat, flour and B+S+M were determi_ned with 6 growing<br />

barrows. Generally, åppârent ileal and faecal amino acid<br />

availabilities decreased frorn frour to whore wheat and to B+s+M.<br />

The average availabilities of the indispensable amino acids<br />

were 91 .6, 87.0 and 72.9/" when determined fro¡r i1ea1 digesta and<br />

93,9, 92.O and 79.6/" when deternined on faeces for flour, whole<br />

wheat and B+S+M respectively. As was found in studies carried<br />

out on corn, wheat and barley, there was a greater disappearance<br />

of dispensable than of indispensable anino acids in the large<br />

intesti"ne. 0f the indispensable amino acids, ARC, HIS and THR<br />

especially, disappeared to the greatest extent. 0f the dis_<br />

pensabLe anino acids GLY and pRO showed the largest dísappear_<br />

ance. The average amino acid disappearance in the large<br />

intestine (as a % of anino acid intake ) increased<br />

fron flow, to whole wheat and to B+S+M and was 4.1, 7.0 and


8.4/o respectively.<br />

Lysine was the least available indispensable a¡oino<br />

acid of flour and whole wheat when determined by the faecal<br />

analysis nethod and was approximatei-y 86/" for both diets.<br />

Threonine was the least avairable indispensable ami-no acid<br />

froa B+S+M, namely 7L.3/" usíng the faecal analysis nethod.<br />

Lysine and THR were about equal Ín being the 1east<br />

availabLe from flour and whole wheat when determined on eaÌ<br />

digesta. The apparent availabilities were approximately /Ç<br />

and 85/" for whole wheat and flour respectively. Threonine<br />

nas the least avaÍlab1e indispensable amino acid fron B+S+M<br />

when detprnined at the end of the :-te.,¿n (5t+%).<br />

The hypothesis that the low LTS availability of<br />

cereal grains is due to the fact that this anìino acid is nainry<br />

deposíted in the proteín fractj.on of lowest digestibility (in<br />

albumin and globulin protein assoeiated withr/or contained in<br />

aleurone cel1s) is not completely valid. The apparent ileal<br />

tTS availability of flour (84.2/") was found to be only L.9/"<br />

2CA<br />

higher than that of whole wheat (79.5%). The difference berween<br />

ileal tYS availabilities fron flour and whole wheat would be<br />

approxinately ?.7/" if the whole wheat had been fínely ground. ïn<br />

addition, it was shown (indirectly by calculations) that the LyS<br />

availability of B+s+M may approxl.mate those of whole wheat and<br />

flour upon fine grinding of diet B+S+M. The relatively 1ow<br />

availability of LTS from flour may possibly be pârtly attributed


to the relative large numbers of lysylprolyl peptide linkages<br />

in flour which are resistant to cleavage by the digestive<br />

enzyne s .<br />

Anino acid availabilities deternined at the end of<br />

the ileum will give a nore accurate measurenent of their åctual<br />

availabilities to the animal than measurement by the faecal<br />

analysis method. Partial verification of this was obtained<br />

when LYS was infused into the caecum, as free LyS nonohydro-<br />

chloride or as part of the rsp-protein complex. rnfusion of<br />

LïS did not result. in an improve&ent in nitrogen retention<br />

(amount of nitrogen retained per day) over that obtained fron<br />

the pigs when they received no LyS infusion.<br />

rnterpretat i-ons of faecal amino acid avairabilities<br />

obtained frorn rats fed high and low protein wheat and barley<br />

sources and the bran and endospern fractions derived from these<br />

cereal grains, should be interpreted carefully because of the<br />

following reasons: 1) separation of aleurone from endosperm<br />

protein by pearling was far fron complete, especially that of<br />

high protein wheat, 2) the measurenent of faecal anino ãcid<br />

availabilities, from endosperm fractions in particurar, uay have<br />

been biased because of subjective measlrre&ents (corour appraisal)<br />

and 3 ) the faecal anarysis method does not accuratery measure<br />

amino acid availabilitíes, particularly those of ARG, HfS and<br />

especially THR (indispensable amino acids).<br />

Regardless of the previous criti.cisns, differences in<br />

)^1


apparent faecal anino acid availabilities due to protein content<br />

endfor variety of wheat and barley were detected. For example,<br />

the apparent IYS availabilities were 78.9 and 73.L/" for hieh<br />

and 1ow protein wheat respectively. In the sane order, they<br />

were 67.7 and. 6O.t/" for high and lov¡ protein barley. As men-<br />

tioned previously, ileal and faecal LYS availabilities would<br />

not differ that much in case the cereal grains had been ground<br />

relatively fine prior to feeding as was done in these studies.<br />

I¡lore research should be carried out to determine the ileal<br />

amino acid availabirities from different varietíes of particular<br />

cereal grains with varyíng leve1s of protein.<br />

Metabolíc ileal and faecal amino acid levels were<br />

determÍned by aid of I protein-free diets contaÍning 5, l0 and<br />

L5/" AJ:phafloc respectively. As the level of Alphafloc increased<br />

from 5 to I0 to I5/o, the average ileal level of the indispen-<br />

sable amino acÍds increased from .030 to .O39 to .Ol¡l grarns per<br />

100 graus of dry natter intake. <strong>fn</strong> the sa¡ne order, the average<br />

level of the dispensable anj.no acids increased fron .119 to<br />

,150 and to .151 grams per 100 grans of dry natter intake. The<br />

dispensable amino acids nade up the rnajor portion of the metabolic<br />

ileal anino acids, namely T5 to 8O/", The ]atter could be<br />

important in nínimizing the loss of indispensable amino acids,<br />

as a result of the processes of digestion (either by faecal loss<br />

or by deanination in the large j.ntestine ).<br />

0f the indispensable anino acj-ds, ARG, THR and LEU (in


descending order) were present in relatively high amounts in<br />

metabolic ileal protein. MethionÍne and Hrs were present in<br />

relatÍvely lov, amounts.<br />

0f the dispensable amino acids, pRO and GLy (in<br />

descending order ) rÀrere present in very high amounts in netaboric<br />

ileal protein. Proline and GLT nade up approxinatety 55 and<br />

16/o respectivery of the total amount of the d.ispensable anino<br />

acids present at the end of the il-eum when feeding the proteinfree<br />

diets. cystine and ryR, which are actually semi-di spensable<br />

aníno acids, 'vere present in very low arnounts in netåboric irear.<br />

prote in .<br />

)12<br />

there was a consistent net disappeârance of ARG, THR,<br />

GLY and PRO between the end of the ileun and the anus of pigs<br />

fed the protein-free diets. prorine in particurar and GLy disappeared<br />

to the largest extent (presumably due to nicrobial<br />

deanination). consistent net increases ürere found for rLE, LEU,<br />

LYS, !lET, PHE and ASP between the end of the ileu¡t and the anus.<br />

This was probabry due to de novo microbiar synthesis of these<br />

anino ac id s.<br />

Protein-free diets overestimate the lever-s of metaboric<br />

ileal anino acids that are normally associated w-ith the feeding<br />

of natural type diets, such as cerear grains. This conclusion<br />

was arrived at by obtaining rtrue' ileal pRo avairabirities (and<br />

in certain instances those of Gl,y and ARG) tnat exceeded lOOf,<br />

regardless of the type of corrections for metabolic ileal anino


acid levels carried out. Interpretation of calculated rtrue,,<br />

faeeal amino acíd availabirities would be even more misleading<br />

2AL<br />

than 'ttruen ileal amino acid availabilities since an additional<br />

error comes into play, namely that certain amino acids are<br />

synthesized by the flora in the large intestine upon feeding<br />

of protein-free díets.<br />

0verestimation of ¡netabolic losses due to the feeding<br />

of protein-free diets were postulated. to be due to increased<br />

cellular rosses of epitheliar cerls and./ or increased. nucus<br />

secretions. 0n the other hand, a decrease in the digestion and<br />

reabsorption of endogenous protei.n secreted into the rumen of<br />

the snall intestine, as initiated by differences in the rate of<br />

passage of protein-free and natural type diets, may be respon_<br />

síble. The overestimation of metabolic ileal a¡nino acid levels, as<br />

well as nj.trogen (and therefore also of rnetabolic faecal a¡nino<br />

acid and nitrogen revels ) is probably caused by a combination of<br />

the factors discussed, in addition to other possibre unidentified<br />

factors.<br />

Protein-free diets are widely used in nutritional<br />

studies on man and anlmals i..e. for the assessment of protein<br />

quality and the deternination of protein (anino acid ) requirenents.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> 1íght of the findings in these studies, the use of<br />

protein-free dÍets for arriving at netabolic anino acid losses<br />

should be reevaluated and nore detafled research is wa*anted<br />

on this aspect.


BÏELÏOGRAPHT<br />

AbransÀ-G.0., I{. Eauer and li. Sprinz. 1963.<br />

<strong>fn</strong>fluence of the nornal floia on mucósãl rnorpholog;r and<br />

cellular renewal in thë ileum. .a. comparison'of-gEir:,,iràe<br />

and conventional nice.<br />

Lab. lnvest. 12: 355 .<br />

205<br />

-Abro1 ,.I.i., D-.C. Uprety, r"r.p. Lhu-=a anci i..S. I{aik. I7T:- .<br />

òor_J_ rertatazer leveLs and protein quality of wheat grains.<br />

Aust. J. Agric. Èes. 22: t95.<br />

Agri-culture Ìjandbook no. 379. Ig7O,<br />

Forage fiber analysis.<br />

Agricultural -Reseàrch Service, United States<br />

Ðepartn:ent of Agriculture.<br />

Al1i.son, il. J. I97A.<br />

Nitrogen.rnetabclism of r'¿minal micro-organisrns.<br />

T+ lP¡¡..+g]9ey of tigestion ¿nd ì-etabolis: i:l ihe F.u:rinant,,.<br />

å.'r . phil_lipson, ed ) . Oriel_ ?ress Linited.<br />

i\ewcestl_e "( upon i1'ne , ingJ_anci.<br />

A.0._{.c. L965.<br />

Cfficial i-ethods of Analrvsis (f Otn e¿. )<br />

George Ðanta Publishing öo. Ì,_enasha, ',i:is.<br />

¡-.Ò.A.C. t97L.<br />

Cfficial ¡'..ethods of Anali'sis (llth ed. )<br />

Ceorge Eanta Publishing Co. j,.enasha , iiis.<br />

Èaker, -!.H., D.I. Eecker, iÌ.ii;. Norton, A.ä. .lensen encl E.C. äe:.non.<br />

I oÁo<br />

_L,vsine imbalance of _ corn protein in growing pig.<br />

"t.<br />

Anir,r. Sci. 28 : 23 .<br />

Eehm, 1. l-954.<br />

ilber den linfluss der Ã.ohfoser in<br />

des Darnverlust- Stickstoffs nach<br />

Kaninchen und Schweinen.<br />

Arch. Tierernahrung t+: Lg7.<br />

EeIl ,<br />

P. H. 195l+.<br />

( Cit ed b¡' i(akada , l:. L . 197 t.) .<br />

,çlutt er auf die ì-ense<br />

Versuchen an.r"attanl<br />

ÐeIl , T.Ì1. L95L.<br />

l;utrient reouirernents<br />

q for Canadian Torkshire swine. li.<br />

stuCy of tlhe li'sine, tr¡.ptophen, :,iÈofla.,:in anã-penioihenic<br />

acr_c. recu.:.:'enents ot' pÍgs-v:eighing jC to I0C pounCè.<br />

Can. i.'-{nj.:. Sci. 4lri -106. "


E; arnason, ¿-. anci ä. "r . Carpenter. l97O .<br />

ilechanisn of heat danaþe in pi.oteins.<br />

changes Ln pure prct:iñs. -<br />

Erit . J. llu'ur . 24 | 313 .<br />

206<br />

Eorgströn, 8., -{. Dahlqvíst, G. Lundh and ,-I . Sjövall . L957,<br />

Studies of intestiñal dígestion and absorpiio;-i; tná-nunan.<br />

.j. Clin. Invest. 3ó: L5aI.<br />

Eorgström, 8., A. Dahlovist, E.E. Gustafsson, G. Lundh and<br />

.i. Ìtalno-uist. 1959.<br />

ïr¡rpsín, inverta se and an¡rlase content of feces of<br />

éç;¿:r¿¡i:Ë<br />

¡clUÞ.<br />

Proc. Soc. Exp. Êiol. l.led. I02: I5L+,<br />

Eorr'land , J. P. L962.<br />

AdCition of l','sine and or a tranouili øer Lo 1or^r protein,<br />

so¡rbean neal êupplementeã "rii;;;-¡;;-ã;";i"Ë"b"ã;;";is".<br />

J. .{ni:. Sci. 2I: 852.<br />

Ê-^ j,re€:ê, -^<br />

:-! Þ J.-tj., J.-1 . Uul',_Ð.I. Greene., ?.'j.. i.'alCroup and<br />

E.L. Stephenson. 1966.<br />

Conpariscn of anino acids 1¡ nilo and co:,n.<br />

Poultry Sci. 45t LO72 (¡-bstr. )<br />

ErauCe, _R..,. K.G. l-ítchetl, -r-.lf . I_¡,'res, ll."r. i,íe'r¡port and<br />

^¿-. Cuth.bertson. 1972.<br />

?he replacen:elt of protein concentrates b;, s¡rnthetic 1¡,sine<br />

in the diet of ¡5rowing pigs.<br />

Erit. ,_'. Nutr. ã7: Lóg'. -<br />

Ërovin, .:i.!. , i-.L. Levine end ì:. Lipkin. 1963.<br />

(Cited 'c:¡ 9euconneau, C. and l-,C. j.ichel. l9?O).<br />

Euraczev¡ski, S., i.l.i.G. Porter, E.A. i.ol1s and î. Zebrov.,ska.<br />

I Otl<br />

¿' I L.<br />

The course of digesticn of different food pr"oteins in the<br />

rât. 2. The effect -of feeding carboh:'drat,e r¡ith p::ote in.<br />

Erit. "T. llutr. 25 z 299 .<br />

CaIhoun, "".-.i_. ,- F_.ìi. iÌepburn anC li.E. Eradle¡r. 1960.<br />

ihe availabilit¡r oi I¡rsine in v¡heat, flou:., Éread and<br />

ðl ù+ âh<br />

J. liutr. 70: 337.<br />

Cerlson, ii.ll. and Ii.S. Eavle.¡. I9ZC.<br />

iÌi.trcgel and arnino acids- in feces of 1¡cung piss receÍrring<br />

a prot:in-free diet anC Ciets containing lråaãa Ler,¿ls ci<br />

so¡,'bean oí1 i;lea1 or casein.<br />

.I . i.iutr. 1C0: t353 .


,1È¡¡c, I¡ lOÁ,<br />

iff ect of carboh,','drat e s on ut ilizât ion of protein<br />

erd 1j- s inê b;. rats.<br />

.T 'trr+- nÒ. .1<br />

Chang, S.f. and H.L. Fuller. Ig6L.<br />

fffect of tannin content of grain sorghuns on theij.<br />

feeCing value for growing chicks.<br />

Poult:'1' Sci. 43: 3C.<br />

Cho,_C.Y., F.D. IÌorney and l.S. Ea;rfsy. L97L.<br />

Exenination of the ârnino ecids in' ileal Ci_gesta anC<br />

Íeces of carnulated pies.<br />

FeC. Proc. lC: 2-r5 1¡.Èstr. ).<br />

0on59r_ r., ;. ^a Penot, H. Charlier and f,. Saccuet . !9/.i.<br />

ì -Stabolisne du iat rrgem-freert.<br />

-r.nn. Eiol . Anirnale, Ðiochin. Eiophi-s. j: 163.<br />

Cranpton, X.i,'. and l.i. ilarris . 1969.<br />

.l-pp1i-eC .r,ni¡:al llutrit,Íon. (2nd Ei. )<br />

r,. .lJ. F¡eenan and Co. , San francisco.<br />

206A<br />

Ðanners , j. L96l+ .<br />

. Yerteringsstudi es blz het varken. Faktoren van j-nvloecÌ<br />

op cie ';ertering der -¡ceder ccaponenten en Ce ve rt 3 erbaa:"he i.d<br />

der aninozu:'en.<br />

iÌ.i. ÐrukkerÍj ttl:est-Frieslandtr, liorn.<br />

de l.¡elenaere, I-i. j.Ii., I.-.L. Chen and i..E. Flarper.<br />

Assessnent o.i factors influenci-ng estinatLon<br />

availebilitj¡ in cereel proiuct s.<br />

j. Agric. Food them. 15: lIS.<br />

of I..sine<br />

lr:per, S.ì. 7973 ,<br />

Anino aci.d.proÍi1es of chenical and anatonícal fractions<br />

o; oet gre1ns.<br />

..T. Sci. Food Âgric . 2d : l-àlrt.<br />

Ðurafd, G., Q. Fauconneau and i. Pénot. 1966.<br />

Grol¡Lh of tissues in the rat and cuelity of protein in<br />

the Ciet; influsnce on nunber anC size ôf ceils.<br />

Ann. Biol. -{nÍnale, Biochin:. Eiophys. 6:. 389.<br />

Easter, R..À.. I972.<br />

Ln i::lpi.orred -r-echnicue<br />

¡- for ciete¡-r:tining anino acid ar¡ai.labiLi.t::<br />

rr¡ -¡ Pr¿ -- Þ .<br />

i-. Sc. lhesis, Texas A â, ì- Llniversitl', :exas.


247<br />

aster, R.-4-. and T. D. îanksley, Jr. 1973,<br />

A technicu-e for re-entrant ileocecal c¡.nnulation oí srr'ine.<br />

"'. -¡-nin. Sci. 35: 1099.<br />

Eastwood, l.I. A. 1973 .<br />

Vegeiable fibre: its ph¡'s1¿¿I properti.es.<br />

Proc . l'lutr. Soc . J 2: 137 .<br />

Eggur,r, E.3. 1958.<br />

-Á.iri.no syrekoncentration og Prot e in-kvalíte t .<br />

Stougaards Forlag, Copenhagen.<br />

rggun, Ð.C. 1969.<br />

Paper (in Danish) fron the fourth Scandinavian grein<br />

ouality c.onference, ^'.rik.i.i, - lielsinki, FinIanC _(a .contrit-uiion<br />

lron landöiiononish forsõg slab ora t o:.iun, iìoli¿heisve; 25,<br />

Copenhagen).<br />

ngg'.un,8.3. I97I.<br />

Conpari-tive protein evaluation l.¡ith r ets anci ba'ci'<br />

<strong>fn</strong>ternational Si'nposiun: tr-Â.rnino -a-ciis ia llninal<br />

l¿^1,.-^ I'eaD<br />

iggun, E.C. 1973.<br />

l- study of certain factors influencing protein utilization<br />

in rats and pígs.<br />

Eeretn. Fors/gslab. LA6.<br />

Eggun:, E.C. and K.D. Christensen. I975.<br />

Influence of tannin on protej.n utÍlization in feeistuffs<br />

rvith special reference to barlev.<br />

In rrEreeding for seed protej.n improvanent using nucl:ar<br />

+ a ¡È¡ i ^rra a l?<br />

International Âtonic Xne.rgy Agency, Yienna.<br />

irbersdobler, T. and G. Riedel. 1970.<br />

.(Cited 'cy Salter, D.lJ., Ï:.f . Coates and D. ilewitt , 197t+.)<br />

::',,-^-r '] D D r'^.rf 'J ;1-eêòh tr nLarlier a.nd j. I saccuet.<br />

J. r .¿ . r-vE:{., ¡1. .i-\ ù-v¡I , i.. ç¡i.<br />

\961'. '<br />

Faecal Iipids in gerni-free end conventional rats.<br />

Erit. J. ixp. Pethol . 45: t+09.<br />

ìu,iart, "r..À-.Ð. Lg67.<br />

Anino acid analirses of glutenins and gliadins,<br />

.1 . Sci. Food ^4gr. 18: L1I.<br />

äusb andryrt .<br />

Farrell, D.J. and K,A. .rohnscn. L972.<br />

LItillzation of cellulose by pigs and its effect on caecel<br />

function.<br />

.Á.nin. P:'od . 1l¿: 2A9 .


Fauconneau, G. and lI.C. IIichel . 1970.<br />

The role of gastrointestinal tract in the Ì"egulat j-on of<br />

protein netabolisn:r. <strong>fn</strong> ttllar:rneLien Protein lletabolisnrt.<br />

1¡o1 . fV. (H.II. l-unro, ed. ) Acaderiric Press. l.iew York.<br />

Filipot , P. , R. ,-r. Eelzile and c. i. Erisson. 19?1.<br />

Availability of the anino acids in caseip, fish neal ,<br />

soya protein and zein as ¡ieasured ín the chicken.<br />

Can. J. Aninr. Sci.51 : 801 .<br />

Folkes, E.F. and f.r.d. Yenrr. '1956,<br />

The anrino ecid content of proteins of berlei¡ Erains.<br />

Eiochero. ¿.6Z: l+.<br />

Ga1lo , "-. T. and 'r.:. G . Fond . I96e ,<br />

Anilo acid suppl ernenta t ion to a1l-corn di-ets for piEs.<br />

,-T. Anirn. Sci . ZT : 73 .<br />

208<br />

Gal-lo, i.T., trtl.G. Pond anC J.W. Logon:arsino. L96e,<br />

Response _of earll'-treaned pigs to anino acid supplerßentet ion<br />

oI corn daets.<br />

J. Âninr. Scí. 27: 1000,<br />

Giovannetti, P.Ìi., S.C. Stothers end F,.J. Parker. L97A.<br />

Coprophagy prevention and availabilit.rr 6¡ anino aciCs in<br />

wheat fcr the grc',{ing ret.<br />

Cen. .I. .{nin. Sei. 50: 269 .<br />

Cordon, T.A. and E.S. l,'ostnenn. 1960.<br />

llorphological stuCies on the gerrnfre e elbino rat.<br />

Anaa. Re¿ . L37: 65,<br />

Gordon, Y..4. and E. Êruckne r-Kardo s s . f96f.<br />

nffect of norr¿al microbial flora on intestinal surface area.<br />

Amer. J. Physisl . 2C1 : 175.<br />

Gupta, J.D., 4.tl. Ðakrourl,, A.E. Herper and C.4.. !h.ehje¡:.<br />

't o


C. P:ers ^h^<br />

in rqhe at<br />

oo?<br />

lt<br />

:1<br />

!ît-<br />

^<br />

eL^,,<br />

u-n1a L1-^<br />

^'¡q:êi ^ ..:s<br />

'.'cl lii.<br />

i ¡ ¡,li'¡c 1'¿-<br />

-Éì<br />

r---^<br />

ôri ñ^ ^ ^.1 -:<br />

10q?<br />

: I : Llron: L¿-er.<br />

rni : ¡ _^.¡-^-,<br />

?c9<br />

i ri:s- i r-: ..ri .t-i- ni -.<br />

4l- ô^--ri ^* ¡*<br />

CUJV.L P L TU:I -L¡I<br />

:nd c ertâin<br />

oi<br />

hôl -+^; !^


iìugli, i.I. and S. Ì_oore. L972.<br />

Deterninê.tion of the tr¡rptophan cont"n-e of protei-ns<br />

b-y lgn- exchange -chromatôiraþh¡, oí alkaline liã"ãi.;ã.-_us.<br />

"'. Eiol . Chen. 2t+7 : ZtZÈ ,<br />

ïr1',_.C..tr., !-.8. Eragg and I.L. Stephenson. I97l .<br />

The avaílabiIit-v- of ar:ino acidè fron: so.r,báan neal for<br />

the rror¡ring chiäk.<br />

Poultry Sci. 5C: l*08.<br />

johnson, V.A. and C.L. La1'. L97U.<br />

Genetic inprovement oi plant protein.<br />

"'. !.9r. Food Che¡n. 22: - 558.. -<br />

Jones, Q.E.,.4. Caldr¡;ell anC ä.Ð. l;iidness. I94S.<br />

Conpareti.ve grov;th pronoting values of próteins of<br />

cereal grains.<br />

J. trÌutr. 35: 6lg.<br />

Ju, J.S. and E.S. N¡sset. 1959.<br />

Changes in total ni'r,rogen content of sone abioninal<br />

viscera in fasting anci reaLinentation.<br />

,.1. ìriuir. 68: 633,<br />

r¡^t-^J^<br />

-rd¡\dLld<br />

r1 r<br />

, 1,i...!. f, I +.<br />

Eiochenical basis for the differences in p1ent, protein<br />

utilization.<br />

J . -¿.gr . Food Che;r. 22 :<br />

- -<br />

2ro<br />

Kihlberg, R. and L.il . iricson. L96L.<br />

.{n:ino acid conposition of 11,¿ flour and . the influence cf<br />

anrino acid ^gupplementation of :.1,e flour anci L,read on gro.,rth,<br />

nítrogen efficíenc¡r ratio ¿nd liver fat in the gro"in!-,.t.<br />

"I. Ilutr. S2: 385 .<br />

Y4øaaih Ð ¡ a r o^..--J---- ---,!<br />

r!..r_¿ Þuri, 11 .:. , ù. ! . saunders anci .Í. F. E.rock. 1gó9.<br />

Anino acid transport in experimental proteín_òalorie<br />

malnutrition.<br />

-{mer . .I . Clin. Nutr . 2L : l3OZ .<br />

l{uiken, i( . A . and C . i.i. Lynran. Lg4e .<br />

Availability of anino acids in sone foods.<br />

i. ilutr. 35: 359.<br />

Íuiken, ä.-Â.. 1952.<br />

Availability of- the essentiel anino ¿cids in cottonseec near.<br />

J . Nutr. /+ô : L3 .


zTL<br />

;êpor'"e, T. and J. îrer:o1íères. L9Q.<br />

lnhibiting action of rice, oat, c,ej-ze , barle Lr, r¡,,e ancl<br />

buckwheat neals on sone proteoÍr'tic eázynes ôf tLe pãtr.r"r".<br />

C.i.. Soc. EioI. 156: IZ6L.<br />

Larson, i{.L. and E.c. I-ìí11. I96C.<br />

Anine îornation anci retabolic activity of nicroorganisms in<br />

the-iIeu¡l_of youls swine fed chlorte-,,¡acj¡c1ine. -"<br />

";. Êacteríol . 80: I88.<br />

Levenson, S.:r-. and Ë. îennant . 1953.<br />

Contr.ibutions of intestinal nic¡'oflora to the nutrition<br />

of the host anirnal . sone netaboric and nutritionai siucies<br />

with gern-free aninals.<br />

Fed. Proc. 22: f09.<br />

Linds-tedt, -G., S. LinCstedt and E.E. Gustefsson. Lg65.<br />

i-ucus in intestinal contents of ger.rfre e rets.<br />

J. ;,:rp. l.ed. 12Ì : zCL.<br />

L1oyd., L.f ., Ð.G. Dale and E.i,'. Cranpton. r9it.<br />

îhe rol-e of the cecun in nutrieni utilizáiion 'cy the piê.<br />

"t. Anim. Sci. 17: 6e4.<br />

Loesche, i,'.;. L96t.<br />

Á.c cul::ul at ion cf endogenous proiein in the cecun o.f the<br />

gern-free rat.<br />

Proc. Soc. ixp. Eio1. i.eC. I28: L9j.<br />

Luckei.', l. D. 1953 .<br />

<strong>fn</strong> llGernfree life- anci gnotobÍologyrr. (Ì.Ð. L,-rcke;.-, ei . )<br />

Acadenic .Press. ìier,¡ ïoik .<br />

I.acGregor, R.:1.. L976. (-,-npublisheC)<br />

l.acrae, J.C. I975.<br />

ihe use òf re-entrant cannulàe to partition Cigestir,-e<br />

function l.¡ithin the gestro- int e stiira 1 t!.act of runinãnts.<br />

ïn rrÐigestion and Ì,-etabolisr: in the Runinant¡l<br />

(Ì-cDoneld, f .r.'i. and A.C.I. ;,:arner, eds. ) The 'jniversitl<br />

of }.ler^¡ lngland Fublishing i_lnit. /,r:r.ì Cale , l-ustralia . "<br />

ì.ason, V.C. end G. llÍlne. I,a7!.<br />

The digestion of bacteÍ'íaI nucopepti_d.e consii-uuents in<br />

the sheep. 2. ihe digestion oï äurar":ic aciC.<br />

,.r. AÊ;ric . Sci. , Camb. 77 : 99 .<br />

ì,ason, T.C. and i,. Falner. L973.<br />

The influence of bacterial activiti,, in the alinentar:¡ canal<br />

of rats on faecal nitrogen excretiän.<br />

Acta Agric. Scand. 2l: 14L.


ì-cLaugh1an, "'.;:., S. Yenkat Êao, i..r. iioal anC<br />

-¡..8. i_orriscn. 1967.<br />

Elood ani no acid studles. yI . Lrse of plasna ani-no ecid<br />

sco¡'e Íor predicting liniting anino aciä (s) ln ¿leta¡"<br />

¡¡¿r*a¡qe<br />

Can. "I . Eiochen. 45: 3L.<br />

212<br />

I'icLaughlan, .T.l-. L,o72.<br />

iíutritional evaluetion of proteins bi' biological nethoCs,<br />

Cereal ScÍence ToCay 17: -162.<br />

l,'a¡'or' -I lJ IO


i-unck, L. I96t+.<br />

-'^^''^..3<br />

-ire !,ar'.rëLaon of nutritÍcnal value in barle¡,. -L-. ïariet¡r<br />

ând nitrcgerl fertirizer effects on che¡:icai" òonpåsition an


ã".irç, Pâ!.Î,lê ri ¡i.iJ., T rî u-.ì,. F a^-L^ jonrbs, Ð : -¿: R:R. Kifer ¡^- and -- p,G. Sn¡rcìe:". 196g.<br />

ïnvestigation of prótein o.uality: ileal recorr"r;'. ãi -<br />

anino acids.<br />

Fed. Proc.27: 1199.<br />

PhilJ-ipson, l_.T. 19jZ.<br />

(Cited br'ì-acÌìae, "'.C. L?75.)<br />

Pond, _ï,'.G., J.H. ilaner and F.A. Linares. l-97J-<br />

. Liniting -arnino acids ìn Colunbían fl.ourj._Z corn for<br />

groïrth oî :.¡ot-rng rats.<br />

J. -Anirrr. Sci. 332 787.<br />

Yoppe , 5. and ii. t.eier. I97L.<br />

.YergleichenCe betrachtunEen d=r eninosaüren rescrption<br />

bei'¡erschiedene tierartãn.<br />

.Á.rch. líe:.ernährung ZL: |3l-.<br />

Сef¡t I' lô(t<br />

J.7 ) I .<br />

Ðer einfluss genetischer unC ökologischer faktor:n auf<br />

den eiwesshauëhalt, \'on sonnerg."-iån. a"",-op se n unter<br />

besoncei.er ber'ück si cht igu.ng dãr exogeneä ã¡r:.noåäuren.<br />

Zuchter. 26: Zl.'L,<br />

Pulse, _R.I., J.P. Ëaker anci G.Ð. potier. 1973.<br />

Iffects of cecal fistulation upon nutr"ián-t digest,ion and<br />

indicator :'etenii on in ho:'ses.'<br />

J. 4.nin. Sci. 37 : 488.<br />

iìobbins, G. S. , ï. Pomeranz anci Ì.i.'. !r ir--l . . I o':l<br />

.Aniáo aciá conposition ãi oãt À"ããiËl-"' L't!'<br />

J. Lgr'1c. Food Chen. 19: 536.<br />

R.osenberg, :i.P-., A. Culik and R.l. fckerj.. Io5c<br />

!:'siñá arcÌ ihreonitt" =ulprä.ru"tãiïà-"å¡ ríóá,<br />

J. Ì\iutr. 69; ZL?,<br />

P.ose-nberg,_ H.ì,. , I.L. Rohdenburg and F..E. fcliert. I9óOa.<br />

l-,ult-iple enino acid supplen:ãntation of r.¡hite cori ¡reã1 ,<br />

J. llutr. 72: 415.<br />

2LI+<br />

Roselberg, !1.R., ¡.L. F,.ohCenburg end R.E. ickert. l96Ob.<br />

Supplenentation of bread prõtein r,,;i th l;,rsine anci'thr.ãonine .<br />

J. llutr. 72: l+23.<br />

Salter, l.ll. ani li.:. Coates. I9?A,<br />

Proc . <strong>fn</strong>t. . Congr. llutr. r,rÌIt-. pracue .


Salter, D.11 . and 1.,i.ì. Coates. L97L.<br />

The influence of the nicroflora of ti,e alinentarlr tract<br />

on protein digesticn in the chick.<br />

Brit . .j . llutr. 26: 5i .<br />

Salter, D.l:l and R,"'. Ful_ford. l97L+,<br />

The influence of the gut n:icroflora on the digestion of<br />

dietary and endogenous proteins: studies of fha a¡:ino<br />

acid composition of the excrete of gern-free anC<br />

conr,'entÍonel aninals.<br />

Erit. J. ltutr. 32l. 62 j .<br />

Salter, D.ll., l:.r. Coates anC Ð. I{evritt. . L9TL.<br />

- The utiliza.tion of protein and excretion of u:"ic aclC<br />

gern-free<br />

in<br />

and conventicnal chicks.<br />

Erit. .i. iiutr. 11: 307.<br />

2L5<br />

Sauer, l.r.C. 1972.<br />

A't ailabilit:' of_ enino acids fron bar-l e:¡, wheat , trj.tical_e<br />

and so.'bean neal for gror,ling swine.<br />

ll. Sc. Thesis, Lrniversiti' of llanitoba, 1,,'i¡¡i. çg.<br />

Sauer, r,l.C,, P.j:, Ciovannetti ånC S.C. Siothe:'s . I97t+,<br />

.¡-vailabilit;' of_ anino acids fron ba:"1e,,, .l^,'h e at ,<br />

and so-r'be an neel for growing pígs.<br />

Can. .I. Anir:. Sci. 5L: 97-Ijj.<br />

' trit icale<br />

Saunders, il..l:. , :j.C. t'lalker. .Tr.. anC G.O. j{ohler. . 1969.<br />

Al-euron¡ ce1ls qnC the digesti bitit-r, of r.¡heat niil_' f e:Cs .<br />

Poultrw Sci. L8: !t+97 .<br />

Saunders, F".l.l. and G,O, Kohler. L9?2.<br />

<strong>fn</strong> '¡itro Ceternination of pi-otein Cigestibiliti' in rrrheat<br />

:ni11f:eds f or. nonogastric äni¡e1s.<br />

Cêreal Chen. l+9: -98.<br />

qL^+l^- t\Î rf<br />

^ ñ<br />

--n:rrar, r:.ir.., ,J. -. -F"ankin, .j.F. ll¡nen ¿nd I,j.G. g:"ance . L9L?.<br />

Ìnvestigation of the pioïi::let e' cheni cal cor:position of the<br />

seperate bran layers of wheet.<br />

Cereel Chen. 2l+: Itl .<br />

Shimada, .¡1. anC T. R . Cline . L97 L.<br />

linitin.-z ai.ino acids of triiicele for ihe growin€ ret<br />

c . j,n:Ii. bci. Ji: 94t.<br />

Sl:de, L.Ì:., i. Eishcp, J.G. ì_orrÍs a¡..1 1..;. ìoLinson. 19?1,<br />

Jl-gestion ar:.d . a'osorption of 15 i:-labeiIcd .-.:icrot -; á1 prot e in<br />

in 'uire large intestine oí t,he ho:'se.<br />

F.r : * Ì¡¡r .: 1aJ . -,.1


' 2l-6<br />

Snook, J.T. 1965,<br />

Jffect of iiet on inteslinal proteoJ_7sis.<br />

Fed. Proc. 24: 9tI.<br />

Snook, J.T. anci J.ii. l:le-ver. t964a.<br />

'i.esponse of digestive enzyme s to dietar¡,. proieins.<br />

,-. itrut,r. Ë2 : 409:<br />

Sncok, .T.T..and J.H. Ì-er¡er. L964b.<br />

Effect oí diet and digestive processes on proteoli.,tì-c<br />

.:.<br />

J. ilutr . 83 : 9l+ .<br />

Soare.sr'J.il., .ir. and R.R. Kife:.. I97L<br />

Evaluetions of protein c-uality based on resicual an:ino<br />

acids of 'r,he ileal contents of chicks.<br />

Poul--,,rj/ Sci. 5A: 41 .<br />

Sod.ek, L. and û.I\i. llIilson. f971.<br />

Ar:ino ací


l,liting, F. and L.li. Eezeau. 1957a.<br />

ihe ¡retabolic fecaL nitrogen excretion of the piE es<br />

influenced by the anount õf flbre in rhe ratioh änd<br />

by bodyweight.<br />

Can. .1. Anirn. Sci . 37: 9j.<br />

'rJhiting, F. and L.l.l. Eezeau, 1957È.<br />

The ¡retabolic fecal nitro_gen excretion of the pig as<br />

infLuenced by the type of-fibre in the ration ãnã t,y<br />

oooyl'Je]-gnt.<br />

Can. J. Anim. Sci. 37: lC6.<br />

I',rillia¡rs, C.H., D..'. Ðavid ancì C. Lisnaa. L962.<br />

The determination of chror:ic oxide in feóes sanples by<br />

ato¡ric absorption spe ctropliot oaetry.<br />

;. -A-gric . sci . 5g:' 3g.I ."<br />

i,¡rsocki , L. A. and .I. P. Eaker. Ig7Z.<br />

Eacterial _protein digestion in the e c-ui-ne lower gut.<br />

.'. ¡t-nin. Sci. 35: 225 (t¡str. )<br />

Zebronska, T. L97je.<br />

Influence oí dietary protein source<br />

digestion in the sanll intestine of<br />

end conposition of digesta.<br />

Rocz . ltlauk R.ol . Ë-95-I , Ll5 .<br />

on the rate of<br />

pigs. ï. Anount<br />

Zebror,;ska, 1. I973b.<br />

<strong>fn</strong>fluence of dietary protein source on the rate cf<br />

Cigestion in the san1l intestine of piss. II. The<br />

rate of protein d_igestion ani enino ãclC absorption.<br />

Rocz. llauk RoL. E-95-I , 136.<br />

2L7


APPENDIÏ TABLE 1, Analysís,of variance between treatments for study 1: Mean<br />

squares for apparent amino acld avaiLabilities aird apparent<br />

nitrogen and dry matter digestibil.Íties.<br />

Source of Variatlon<br />

Degrees of Freedon<br />

AMTNO ACTDS<br />

Ess_entiel<br />

ARG<br />

HTS<br />

ÏI,E<br />

Î,EU<br />

IYS<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Ess ential<br />

_r-LÃ_-<br />

ÂSP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NTTROGEN<br />

DRY I.T,AITER<br />

x (p(0.05)<br />

xx (P


APPENDIX TABL,E 2. Analysis of<br />

squares for<br />

Source of Variation<br />

Degrees of Freedom<br />

AMTNO ACIDS<br />

Essential<br />

HIS<br />

ILE<br />

LEU<br />

tYs<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential-<br />

--rffiF----<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

GLT<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

NTTNOGEN<br />

( P


¡lPPlllDrx r¡nll 3. Thc Índlviduêl apperent ileal and faecal amino Ecid av¿irabilities<br />

fron co¡n_in_studl' 2Ð, jn êdditlon to nitrogen and dr.,,, maiter<br />

dígestibilÍties and a1'.rege dêi.11, dry rnattei intake. '<br />

P]NTOD<br />

PIG llt:?:ìti<br />

LOCATION<br />

ArrNc ^crDs (i;)<br />

Ussential<br />

-ÃTmllIS<br />

TLiJ<br />

LXU<br />

t,rf 3.<br />

t:tTr<br />

PIIE<br />

TM<br />

V,{L<br />

l.lon- jis sential<br />

GLU<br />

PRO<br />

TTR<br />

t:tTR0ctit,l<br />

DRÏ ÌITTUR?<br />

DNY T,ATTËR,<br />

Dnl:,'.tÂT1 ER<br />

INTAJíE<br />

t9.8<br />

ti9.1<br />

89.4<br />

9+.O<br />

o).L<br />

92.2<br />

8r.1<br />

90.?<br />

85.8<br />

84.9<br />

9),2<br />

73.3<br />

12.?<br />

llo.J<br />

91, O<br />

B0.l<br />

81.8<br />

l.765<br />

)<br />

T,¡\ECDS<br />

9t.1<br />

93 .2<br />

e,7 . (,<br />

93 ,5<br />

68.i,<br />

90'¿l<br />

8 j.3<br />

87 .)<br />

89 ,6<br />

È,o. tr<br />

do 1<br />

93 .4<br />

9) .r<br />

90.2<br />

89,¿l<br />

BB.3<br />

89,3<br />

ILi'U¡':. FÂICDs TLNIÛ!<br />

88.2 92.5<br />

89.7 92.6<br />

87.) 86.6<br />

92.4 93.1<br />

d't a !,r t<br />

92.2 8S. r+<br />

9c.3 90.7<br />

80.o 85,t+<br />

tì4.4 S7.1<br />

89.2 90,7<br />

8t+.7 86.t0<br />

84.9 89,3<br />

92.) 9t+.5<br />

89.6 92.3<br />

E5 .9 9r.2<br />

8 9.1 89 .6<br />

e) .9 8t .5<br />

8l.l 0¿.9<br />

L765<br />

TT<br />

FÂECIS ILTU;i IA¡C¿S<br />

89.6 %.2 89.6<br />

89 ] 95.o 88.9<br />

94.2 90. t 88.6<br />

91,.4 95.1 93.1<br />

8[.0 e j.6 8z.z<br />

91 ,4 92.2 91.!,<br />

9),4 92.9 91.5<br />

82.5 88. 5 80.1<br />

88.1 89 ,5 86,3<br />

91.1 92.6 89. t,<br />

86 .9 87 .r 8t+.7<br />

76.11 9r.8 78. ¿r<br />

gb.o 95.O 92.t+<br />

77 .2 87 .8 69 .2<br />

È4. L, 9L.2 75,6<br />

87.4 92.3 85,6<br />

9r.7 9r.6 89.8<br />

8t+.2<br />

80.7<br />

S2. ¿!<br />

1900<br />

ol , dâ .<br />

90.3 79.8<br />

81./t<br />

1900<br />

[or thq determination of lllìT and CYS êveilabilities, faeces from the z<br />

sanê diet during each pêrticular t.est pcriod, were iooled.<br />

Dry matter digestibilíties in this ror,¡ v¡ere based on the chronic oxide r¡ethod,<br />

Dry matter digest.ibilities in this row uere l¡ased on total collection,<br />

93.3<br />

96 .r<br />

94.2<br />

9¿1.6<br />

86.5<br />

92.8<br />

90.0<br />

92.)<br />

91.8<br />

95 ,r<br />

92.3<br />

9r .5<br />

91.8<br />

90,1<br />

pigs, fed the<br />

85.9<br />

87 .6<br />

86.4<br />

91.8<br />

92.O<br />

89 'z<br />

?7.o<br />

83 ,9<br />

FtIc¡ls<br />

9L.6<br />

92.6<br />

86.8<br />

93 .5<br />

80,6<br />

87.9<br />

94.7<br />

85.4<br />

87 .5<br />

88.1 90.1<br />

82.6 85.5<br />

83 .1 89.6<br />

2\.2 22-?<br />

I z. I ë).t+<br />

8t+.3 9¡,, o<br />

8l ,B 9o.7<br />

88.1 89.?<br />

82. I 88 .,t<br />

60.0 .89,6<br />

79.?<br />

1900<br />

ILDUi'; ¡"{DCUS<br />

6r. j<br />

85 .0<br />

8.1.0<br />

88.8<br />

92,o<br />

86 .9<br />

72.1+<br />

79.3<br />

82.8<br />

78.6<br />

83 .1<br />

87 .9<br />

6r,t<br />

69 .3<br />

80.1<br />

.81r.2<br />

77,r<br />

1900<br />

B7 .l+<br />

92.3<br />

81.9<br />

87 ,9<br />

90 ,)<br />

84. ¿<br />

87 ,6<br />

89 .5<br />

86.0<br />

¿9.6<br />

d5.ó<br />

9r .l+<br />

89.3<br />

88.2


^PP¡NDIX î^nLX l+, The individuel aFpêrent ileal and faecaf enino âcid avâilabitities<br />

fron barÌe:¡ in study 2a, in eddition to nit¡ogen and dry matter<br />

digestibilities and average dail"\' drl. matter intake,<br />

IL]]<br />

LDU<br />

T,Y5,<br />

T-ETT<br />

TI]È<br />

1'¡.L<br />

llon-Essential<br />

¡LÂ<br />

cïsI^3F- Pn0<br />

1LR<br />

¡\:rTRoctì¡t ^<br />

DtìY t;^,. T:tÍ<br />

läY I-,'li"i':ÌtJ<br />

Dnï L^TTritì. I<br />

7,4.4<br />

78,8<br />

7 8.6<br />

7.L.2<br />

80.7<br />

80.1<br />

66,6<br />

68.2<br />

8L .5<br />

¿5.5<br />

72. tr<br />

?7.rt<br />

7l+.6<br />

62,6<br />

65.O<br />

766<br />

87,5 e3.9<br />

9r.7 8r.9<br />

¿r,8 81.0<br />

85.6 83 .0<br />

76.7 73 ,6<br />

80.0 80.7<br />

87.3 83,7<br />

1ô A 1) â<br />

tll 1 ?o 2<br />

/o. / /t.t<br />

7 5.3 7L.9<br />

Ë8.6 Ê1.5<br />

92.3 I8.0<br />

81,8<br />

(,t¡.6<br />

2?.9 91.7<br />

ë).) /tt.t<br />

8t,.3 60.,<br />

r). / / /.é<br />

82.7 7a.4<br />

''lo<br />

1 1t',/,<br />

Il;T¡li[ (¡'./da], )<br />

I' ?-' 3 \he sar¡e as in ^pFendi-.., Table 3<br />

90.7<br />

83.r<br />

8?.o<br />

80.0<br />

87 .9<br />

8tr'9<br />

77.O<br />

78. 9<br />

8¿t.6<br />

91.1<br />

8lr . t'.<br />

83 .7<br />

8l .1<br />

85.6<br />

8a.5<br />

76.6<br />

75.4<br />

75.6<br />

88.9<br />

74.O<br />

83.9<br />

81.1<br />

fll+.2<br />

7t.3<br />

190 2<br />

92.)<br />

8l .r<br />

87.0<br />

78.5<br />

¿e.2<br />

6t!.J<br />

78.o<br />

89.0<br />

82.7<br />

93 .L<br />

87 .5<br />

85 .0<br />

86.0<br />

83 .9<br />

80.?<br />

27.8 Qq.t, 88.0<br />

. 1r.6 9o.t 79.r n.5<br />

' 3z.o 9o.z za.o qz.i<br />

?5.7 el.4 7?.o 8l+.,, So.O Cr,. ¡<br />

79.4 B5.r , 80.8 e7.o 81.5 ed.o<br />

ç9-.1 Z\.9 73.e 77 .e T.7 7).6<br />

qo.3 90.¡ 79.5 co.o 8r.l 4ô.0 ðí:3<br />

t'6.9 82.6 88.5 sz.ó l.s.'6<br />

óq.6 79.7 ?0.6 gz.L zt,z ir.á<br />

76.) 82.8 77.3 e4.9 7?.5 !,5.4,<br />

65.5 75.)<br />

67 ,s 76.6<br />

77 .3 e9. 0<br />

77.3 78.6<br />

7) .r i8.?<br />

7 4.t 8ô ,6<br />

6o.L. 'ìq.o<br />

îo.i ii.6<br />

? L.i 8¡1. ó<br />

85.t* J3.r!.<br />

e4.g 2r.7<br />

57,t+ 81.4<br />

t7.7<br />

68,t* 61 '),O .4 673 rli,g<br />

7t+.9 91.0 81.1 92.7 Cz.q .)i.2<br />

72.3 c'5.5 7?.6 87.6 ?5.6 iil.o<br />

77 .6 83 .6 78.t+ 86. 6 rlo. 2 S6.1<br />

70.6 g/*.r ?5.7 86.1 7),r n?.5<br />

(,6 .r ü .9 62 .6 ¿j .6 ó1r.0 dt . ?<br />

ó4. .3 66 .t 65 ,6<br />

rgAz I9O2 1902<br />

ÀJ<br />

¡\)<br />

H


.]\PPÛNDIX TABLIJ 5. ]'he i ndividual êpPsrent íleal and feêcâl ar,rino êcid av¿j.låbilities;<br />

trom vr¡éai.'i" "ti,äy ãa, in addition to nitrofen and dr]¡ natter ì<br />

.ligestibilities end avcra¡le daill' dry rnatter intake.<br />

PIRTOD<br />

PTC NUtlP.lilì<br />

LOCÂTTON<br />

ACrDS (ii )<br />

Essential<br />

^i1TN0<br />

ARG<br />

lll s<br />

rLn<br />

Li]U<br />

LÏ5.<br />

r-:1r<br />

PIIË<br />

VAL<br />

tlon-Ðssential<br />

ALÂ<br />

AfìPcÏst<br />

tìt u<br />

cT,v<br />

PRO<br />

TYR<br />

t'r-tTnoc[,tr .<br />

ILiìUH TIDCES :tllull r^l1cEs ll,EÛ]: F^[cils ]Lllui, FÂ[crs<br />

87.6<br />

86.0<br />

87 .2<br />

75,6<br />

88. É<br />

77.2<br />

e') .3<br />

71+.5<br />

76.2<br />

?,2,6<br />

92.8<br />

Bl+.9<br />

84. B<br />

P,6.o<br />

83.7<br />

DRY m,l'r EÌá ? 4.I<br />

ÐtÌr t,^ TT Jn-', ?i.9<br />

DNY I A]'TIIJI I? 59<br />

II:l ¡,iir (r/dFr )<br />

o"o<br />

91+.6<br />

87.t*<br />

o)t<br />

8ó.r<br />

88.7<br />

e3 .7<br />

82 .9<br />

96 .7<br />

88,7<br />

95,5<br />

92,I<br />

89. r<br />

90.6<br />

l' 2' ) Tye same es ln AFfendix, ]¡b1c 3'<br />

84.0 9r.2 85.4 9t,2<br />

e6.9 gJ.r+ 89 3 93.8<br />

8l .9 89. r 91, .6 86.9<br />

Pr, .l 90. e 86.7 89.t,<br />

?o.t+ 7?,t¡ 76.1 78.2<br />

àt+ .7 87 . r+ 86 .1+ ¿7 ,9<br />

86.7 92.3 88.3 90.8<br />

7\.5 85 .5 76. .a 8t+.3<br />

?8.7 88.1. Bl.r 86.1<br />

6? .? 8).2 7\-.2 80.1<br />

6? .5 8r.o 76.3 80.1<br />

82.6 q3.2 t5.6 %.6<br />

9L.) 96.9 .a2.6 96.1'.<br />

62.2 89.0 ?6.3 e7.r<br />

86.6 96,9 83.6 96.)<br />

80.8 92.O 85.r 9l. o<br />

83.2 138.6 85.2 87 .t+<br />

77.8 rì9.9 t).8 90. t+<br />

70 .3 e9 ,2 7) .7 88 .6<br />

7759 tÛ9¿!<br />

II<br />

B6.l<br />

85.t+<br />

86.9<br />

t).t<br />

86.1<br />

8s.1<br />

?6.L<br />

82.6<br />

t? o<br />

?l+.8<br />

93 .o<br />

9a.6<br />

83 .)<br />

¿6.0<br />

Ð.6<br />

96.0<br />

90.5<br />

92.6<br />

82.tn<br />

87.9<br />

93,6<br />

88 .O<br />

90.3<br />

9tr,5<br />

93 .6<br />

97.t+<br />

90.3<br />

96 .9<br />

93.2<br />

90.L<br />

82.2 92.5<br />

?2.9 è9.2<br />

L89t+<br />

rl¡ruri Frl[cls ILtrJ]l I'Â llcns<br />

88.2<br />

89.2<br />

89 .4<br />

79.9<br />

88.8<br />

9l .6<br />

too<br />

â1:A<br />

79.5<br />

Ê1,r<br />

87 .5<br />

9l+.2<br />

8t .3<br />

75.o<br />

73.6<br />

l¿oL<br />

Ð.6<br />

95.3<br />

oì,<br />

92.8<br />

82.7<br />

9r.5<br />

94.O<br />

88,5<br />

90.5<br />

86 .5<br />

85.6<br />

9t+.4<br />

o?(<br />

90.6<br />

97 ,It<br />

9) .6<br />

9r.t,<br />

a), l<br />

86,2 Ð.r,<br />

9r.0 96.2<br />

85.7 89.9<br />

8C..9 9l.9<br />

76 .6 8r1.0<br />

88 .I 91.5<br />

89,0 9l .o<br />

?? .t+ 87 .8<br />

àj.5 89.5<br />

7 t+.O 85 .L<br />

76.6 rì4 .1<br />

87 .5 91+ .l)<br />

92. U 97.3<br />

dñt<br />

82.t* 97 .I<br />

d5n a)a<br />

16.tn 90.1<br />

B[.] 9r.5<br />

7?-.3


APPENDIJ( TÂBIE 6. Mean squâres of the analyses of variance for th€ aDparent<br />

ileal and faecal availabiLíties of the essential añino<br />

aclds for study 2a.<br />

ÂMINO ACIDS<br />

Source of ]rariatfoB<br />

Treatrnent (2)I<br />

Pertods (2)<br />

Pies (5)<br />

Location (l)<br />

Treatnents x<br />

LocåtÍon (2)<br />

Periods x Location (21<br />

Pigs x Location (5)<br />

Error (L6)<br />

1<br />

x<br />

to(<br />

ARG<br />

Hls<br />

58.79xx t35.olx')( 169.90x,\ zh7.o7Æ<br />

3.28 O,g2 2.3L 1.91<br />

6.80x g.g6x g.r+1 6.59<br />

382,20>Å '+76,6rs 75.L11


APPENDIX TABI,E 7, Mean squares for the analysls of varlance for the<br />

apparent lleal and faecaL avaiLabillti.es of the<br />

non-essential anino aclds, in addftion to nitrogen<br />

and dry natter dlgestlbtlttles for study 2a.<br />

AMINO ACIDS<br />

Squrce of variation<br />

Treatnent (2)l<br />

r.<br />

x<br />

Periods (2)<br />

Ptes (5 )<br />

I,ocatlon (l)<br />

Treatnents x<br />

Í,ocatlon (2)<br />

Perlods x Locatton (2'<br />

Plgs x Locatlon (J)<br />

Error (1ó)<br />

ÂI,A<br />

8o5.02xx )'+7,22xx<br />

5.r7 7.29<br />

L7.64x L7,39x<br />

,Ì00.00Æ 2go.7oÆ<br />

,+6.3trÆ 2o.5Lx<br />

2.29 2.23<br />

8.t1 9,23<br />

4.87 ¡t.68<br />

Nu¡nbers ln parentheses lndicåte the degrees of freedon.<br />

(P4.05)<br />

(P@.01)<br />

GLY<br />

8t+.5l.loc L7l+.53xx<br />

L.38 L3.t+5<br />

3.82 bL.36xx<br />

L62.9grü 2288.orxx<br />

11.32xx L.56<br />

o.8) 3,.37<br />

1.4r 35.3Ø<br />

1.38 8.5r<br />

TYR<br />

100.73)o( 170.58xx 1?O, Ogxx<br />

0.20 2.O3 2.87<br />

25.O8 10.03x 7,26<br />

L167.36xx 633,36Æ tgt.OOro(<br />

7,29 Lt+.52x L2.6Lx<br />

b.Lg L,35 3.5L<br />

18.0t+ ,+.s3 2.25<br />

Lt.42 3,06 2.78<br />

L53.3ü¿ 265.IOxx<br />

o.95 2.20<br />

L,+.33'q 3.60<br />

682.95xx L796 '3,Lr;x<br />

12.8610( 5[.L6)cx<br />

L.33 0.5r<br />

4.b5 2.66<br />

l.60 5.75<br />

¡\)<br />

À)


APPENDIX TABLE 8. Mean squares of the analyses of variance for<br />

the apparent ileaI and fâeca1 availabilities<br />

of [ifET and CIS for study 2a.<br />

AMINO ACTDS MET cYs<br />

Sourcq of variation<br />

Treatnent (2 )l<br />

Periods (2)<br />

Pies (Z)<br />

Location (1)<br />

Treatnent x<br />

Location (2)<br />

Periods x location (2)<br />

Pigs x Location (2)<br />

Error (4)<br />

L?7.O3Æ<br />

2.75<br />

7.86<br />

0.14<br />

à.26<br />

0.2L<br />

L.62<br />

2.3t<br />

59.58<br />

0.83<br />

2.60<br />

383.64Ð'<br />

3.98<br />

5.O5<br />

0.16<br />

L2.lrZ<br />

llumbers in pàrentheses indicate the degrees of freedorc.<br />

(P


APPENDfX TABLE 9. The lnalir¡ídual metabollc 11e41 anino acid and nitrogen Levelsl,<br />

tn addltion to dry ¡trâtter digestlbilities and dally dry natter<br />

intake for plgs fed the nalntenance dieùs.<br />

LEVET, OF ALPHAFLOC (ø,<br />

PIG NUMBER<br />

AMINO ACTDS<br />

Essential<br />

ÀR0<br />

HTS<br />

ILE<br />

I,EU<br />

LÏS^<br />

MET¿<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

V.AL<br />

ASP<br />

GI,U<br />

GLY<br />

Pno<br />

SER<br />

TÏR<br />

NITROCEN<br />

DRY MATTER DTCESTIBÍLITY (ø)?<br />

DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILTTT (ø }4<br />

DRY MATTER TNTAKE<br />

I 3<br />

4<br />

.0ór .o39<br />

.o7, .065<br />

.r39 .L2?<br />

.186 . o85<br />

.l+6r+ .2r+3<br />

.o7, .06,+<br />

.o2r+ .017<br />

,27L .181<br />

85.8 87.o<br />

9r.2 85.6<br />

825 162r<br />

. o4r<br />

.016<br />

.03r.<br />

.035<br />

.o33<br />

.o07<br />

.018<br />

.Ol+2<br />

.0ll+<br />

.Ol+2<br />

.oóo<br />

.L22<br />

,L22<br />

.494<br />

,072<br />

.or5<br />

.224<br />

86.4<br />

88.7<br />

1560<br />

rl<br />

.o27 ,o35 .04ó<br />

.o09 ,012 .016<br />

.o29 ,o33 .o3o<br />

.o3¡¡ .01+8 .046<br />

.028 .039 .046<br />

.008 .o11 . otl<br />

.oL7 .O27 .O29<br />

.038 .o52 .o47<br />

.o32 .O43 .041<br />

.o35 .Ot+5 .061<br />

.o59 .O72 .076<br />

.LO7 .lzt+ .120<br />

,090 .090 .L29<br />

.2b8 .27O .4t+9<br />

.o59 .O55 .062<br />

.orlt .021 .019<br />

.\76 .222 .31O<br />

86.9 86,7 77.L<br />

90.8 86.3 90. o<br />

t¡.59 L586 52L<br />

Expressed as grans per iOO gran dry ¡natter intake. 2 Deterrnlned by acld hydrolysLs !<br />

fleal dry natter d1gèstfbtllties ln thls row vrere based on the chronlc oxlde nethod. ]<br />

fleat-


ÂPPEI'lDrr TABLE Lo, The lndividual Í¡etabollc faEcal a¡nlno acid and nitrogen levelsl,<br />

. In adrJitlon to dry natter dlgesttbllltles for pigs fãa tñe -nalntenance<br />

diets.<br />

PIG NI'}IBER<br />

AMINO ACIDS<br />

Ëssential<br />

--TRG-<br />

HIS<br />

II,E<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS^<br />

I4ET¿<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

--rrî-<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

c¿T<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÏN<br />

NITROGEN<br />

DRY MATTER DIGÐSÎIBILITY (ø)<br />

.049<br />

.oL7<br />

' Otld<br />

.060<br />

.068<br />

.o25<br />

.ot+1<br />

. 050<br />

.055<br />

.0,66<br />

.101r<br />

.130<br />

.o55<br />

.060<br />

. o49<br />

.036<br />

.204<br />

90.1<br />

.0¡rg<br />

.o?3<br />

'o92<br />

'otrz<br />

, ot+l<br />

.034<br />

-026<br />

. r.50<br />

9o.0 92<br />

1 Expressed as grams per 1OO grân dry natter inteks.<br />

2 Deternlned by acld hydrolysls.<br />

.92?<br />

.010<br />

.o31<br />

.937<br />

.g4o<br />

.ql5<br />

.925<br />

.o3o<br />

.o34<br />

.o19<br />

.008<br />

,O27<br />

.O37<br />

.038<br />

.011<br />

.o21<br />

.026<br />

.O29<br />

,o24<br />

.o1ó<br />

.O28<br />

.Otrz<br />

,036<br />

.OL2<br />

.026<br />

.03o<br />

.o33<br />

.o58<br />

. o20<br />

.O7L<br />

.!25<br />

.o9i<br />

.O3t+<br />

.o7t+<br />

.0óô<br />

,085<br />

.0r+1 .036 .0,10 .log<br />

,065 .016 .c/62 ,L53<br />

.o93 .o82 .o77 .L97<br />

.q¡r .o28 .o32 . o87<br />

.o34 .032 .026 .109<br />

.o3g .o34 .o28 .o?i<br />

.or8 .016 .o2o .oü<br />

.L20 .111 .L33 ,323<br />

.o 92.2 9L,2 85,8<br />

.o22 .0r+1 .03r<br />

.009 .o18 . old<br />

.03o .046 .038<br />

.or+[ .o72 .O57<br />

.o37 .O59 .O5t+<br />

.0r3 .020 .OL9<br />

.o28 .043 .O35<br />

.O33 .O50 .0,¡L<br />

.036 .05r+ .ob5<br />

.0[r+ .066 .056<br />

.0ó6 .101 .086<br />

,09o .13O .116<br />

.o33 .05r .0r+rr<br />

.o57 .063 .o53<br />

.o39 .O5) ,O45<br />

.o22 .O31 .026<br />

.L35 . r.98 .166<br />

87.3 86.5 86.À<br />

'05L<br />

.079<br />

.lLt<br />

. or¡1<br />

.062<br />

.Ol+5<br />

.o23<br />

,169<br />

85.9<br />

.05l+<br />

.o8L<br />

.106<br />

.o42<br />

.055<br />

, o44<br />

.o25<br />

.169<br />

d6.8


APPEND* 'ABLE 11' Ti:ir;f,Tîiîì":l iiîlåË:;<br />

Source of VariatÍon<br />

Degrees of Freedom<br />

AT1]NO ACTDS<br />

Essent iaI<br />

-tr-nT-<br />

LTTC<br />

ÏLE<br />

LEU<br />

M¡<br />

¡r:ET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

--lïî_- Irion-Essential<br />

ASP<br />

CLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

N TTROGEN<br />

DRY I,IATI'ER<br />

xx<br />

( P


DDi:¡nTi1'r1' ñ1<br />

^ ^ E.r ¿r ì ¡II 1¿J¡{]J¿.t ! ¡\DJJJJ J-'. ^<br />

229<br />

The individual apparent faecal ar:rino<br />

acid avail-abilities fror:r barle;' i n<br />

study 2b, in addition to nitrogen<br />

and dr]' rnatter digestibilities.<br />

PERTOÐ -r 1 111<br />

PïG I'llll'ßER<br />

AÌ'lmo AcIÐs (É)<br />

Essential-<br />

AR,G<br />

HÏS<br />

ILE<br />

iEU<br />

],YS<br />

¡81<br />

.r-J1¿<br />

T,TR<br />

YAL<br />

Ìion-Es s ent ial<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

GI,U<br />

GiY<br />

¡_:.Lu<br />

SER,<br />

lYn<br />

NITROGETI (I)<br />

DRT I.;ATTER (ií)<br />

88.0<br />

89.8<br />

80.6<br />

85.3<br />

nè n<br />

/>.ö<br />

87.r<br />

79.2<br />

82.8<br />

.â .)<br />

76,t,<br />

olo<br />

or_.4<br />

s4.9<br />

Õ).t<br />

è. ')<br />

82. o<br />

87 .0<br />

o),Y<br />

n< a<br />

80.9<br />

Ad'o<br />

68.7<br />

82.3<br />

71, .I<br />

75.2<br />

Áô?<br />

68.5<br />

89. o<br />

1¿.O<br />

èaì È<br />

81 .4<br />

/¿J.O<br />

82.7<br />

ê1 a1<br />

çnn<br />

d"d<br />

"o .È<br />

.)+.¿<br />

oo A<br />

tö. /<br />

dÁ ar<br />

1ó.4<br />

82.0<br />

NE E<br />

or rì<br />

8t.2<br />

ot<<br />

8¿*.0<br />

d1 ,)<br />

ó¿.1<br />

da ¡<br />

öo.ö<br />

d'7 Ê<br />

"o i<br />

'7t è<br />

ö1.¿<br />

JoÈ<br />

o¿.¿<br />

'iA t<br />

/o.o<br />

o'1 '1<br />

8r.9<br />

o)t<br />

85.0<br />

Ò1 't<br />

82.L<br />

(\? l<br />

87 .5 SZ.r<br />

88. ó 87 .L<br />

80.3 8l_.1<br />

8t+.7 ô4.9<br />

a4 ) ,7t <<br />

77.2 80.9<br />

86.6 86.8<br />

78.9 79 .2<br />

.tr /{<br />

Õr..Þ ô¿.4<br />

75.6 ?5.2<br />

I >. / i ) .o<br />

9r.9 92.6<br />

80.7 81.0<br />

90. 3 9!.t+<br />

8t+.7 B¿+.9<br />

èa Ë, d" ê<br />

t.L. ¿/ r).v<br />

83.5 78.3<br />

Ar ^<br />

ÒI.J oj-.O


APPIi'iDi:i TAEL¡ 1l .<br />

PER,ÏOD<br />

PTG NUiGER,<br />

Ai'iti\io Ac TDs (i¿ )<br />

Es s -:m- entie.l<br />

HIS<br />

]LE<br />

LJU<br />

LYS<br />

I'i¡ 1<br />

PIÌE<br />

TI{R,<br />

VAI,<br />

I] U¡.(- JJÈ ù € II U I dI- -_T1r-<br />

ÁeD<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TÏR<br />

rirrRocEN (i¿ )<br />

ÐAI I-IATTER (:í)<br />

93.3<br />

9r.0<br />

ar, . ù<br />

ÕÒ.Õ<br />

88 .7<br />

89.0<br />

92.0<br />

Òt. t<br />

95.3<br />

ðð. z<br />

9)+.L<br />

9r.7<br />

YL.J<br />

90 .1<br />

230<br />

ihe individual apparent faecal arnino<br />

acid availabi.Iities Íron corn in<br />

siud)' 2b, in addition '"o ni.tro6en<br />

and dry matter ciige st ibili*"ie s.<br />

aY.l<br />

9r.2<br />

ô) . ¿<br />

>z.v<br />

78.8<br />

,3 l,)<br />

Ò).+<br />

ðo. o<br />

0c. ¡/<br />

84.2<br />

o))<br />

ö¿l.u<br />

êÈo<br />

ÕO. ¿t<br />

86.2<br />

s8. E<br />

ol l<br />

93.4<br />

%.6<br />

éJ.L<br />

Ò1.4<br />

ol ?<br />

9t.L<br />

87.0<br />

93.2<br />

90.9<br />

90.3<br />

ðð.o<br />

89.6<br />

o't t<br />

ôro<br />

ô(.Y<br />

>).o<br />

Õ¿.¡)<br />

éo.J<br />

9r.2<br />

c).4<br />

c't..t<br />

89.6<br />

öo.)<br />

c? c<br />

86.0<br />

020<br />

cìar 2<br />

doo<br />

88.9<br />

89.3<br />

ITT<br />

ÊÕool?<br />

v./. -/ /L.t<br />

9r.r 91.2<br />

4c. O


.dPPri'iÐrr TAELE 14.<br />

23L<br />

The individual apparen-i, faecal altino acici<br />

evailabilities fron wheat in sludy 2b,<br />

in additi"on to ni*,,roêen and dry<br />

r,latter digestibilities.<br />

PERTCÐ irï<br />

PIC liil'",E¡,R<br />

Ar:rÌ{0 ÀcÐs (f )<br />

ãs sent ial<br />

-æ-äis<br />

TLE<br />

ï.,¡ü<br />

LTS<br />

t=T<br />

PäË<br />

TiiR,<br />

V.{L<br />

-.ffi- lion-fssential<br />

^ êD<br />

GiU<br />

GIY<br />

PRO<br />

c:tD<br />

lYR<br />

r'¡rra,oc¡ìN (É)<br />

Ð.ìT iiATTEr (i6)<br />

or Ê<br />

9U.7<br />

90.0<br />

80.9<br />

ÕÕ. )<br />

93 .4<br />

à6.7<br />

89. E<br />

d, E<br />

83.7<br />

97.3<br />

89.4<br />

97.L<br />

O' A<br />

90.7<br />

9L.3<br />

Õ(). Õ<br />

93.4<br />

oà l<br />

90.5<br />

92.7<br />

82.8<br />

90,7<br />

93.7<br />

90.4<br />

aA '1<br />

rJ).o<br />

o?(<br />

90.8<br />

o,J )<br />

o? ?<br />

91.0<br />

Ya',)<br />

88.9<br />

92.8<br />

95.o<br />

ôaì I<br />

ot ?<br />

81.8<br />

88.0<br />

ot Ã<br />

öt. t<br />

89.0<br />

Õ) , )<br />

97 .t+<br />

.+ô o<br />

90.1<br />

orÀ<br />

ö/.4,<br />

%.2<br />

94.6<br />

ÕÕ. )<br />

ôlt<br />

Õr.o<br />

85 .0<br />

otL<br />

ö) , ><br />

61.1<br />

8r.ó<br />

96.8<br />

ÒÕ.¿<br />

96.6<br />

88.9<br />

90.6<br />

d?d<br />

9J.L<br />

Õt. .7<br />

90. B<br />

o).2<br />

óy. o<br />

01 Á<br />

oa.¿<br />

94.+<br />

90.4<br />

Õ).)<br />

.-ia 1<br />

69.t<br />

a¿.¿<br />

69. ó<br />

6'0.1<br />

OJ.U<br />

ðo.4 /o.¿<br />

ö), / / ).u<br />

/t.v //..+<br />

yu. o ó4. o<br />

Õ,1 t. ÒA a<br />

./1.+ /v.-<br />

./J.)<br />

e/.)<br />

Yv./ ór.)


AppJNDïï. TAËLI 15 lríean squares of the analyses of variance of the metabolic faecal<br />

anino acid and nítrogen excretion from study 2b.<br />

Source of<br />

variat ion<br />

Degrees of<br />

fr ee donr<br />

AIll\0 ACïDS<br />

Essen bial<br />

---Ãm-<br />

Hts<br />

rLìJ<br />

L]IIJ<br />

!.1Þ<br />

¡UDT<br />

PI"lit<br />

1IlJl<br />

I/AL<br />

Itron-ilssential<br />

--am'--<br />

ASP<br />

GLU<br />

rrL f<br />

PRO<br />

SlìB<br />

TYIi,<br />

NÏT¡lOGTJN<br />

(P


^P 'llJi}J¡. T^LLJ 1ó' The individunl .nìetabolic laoc¿L onino acid and nitro,:cn cxcrcL-ior.<br />

pi¿s fed<br />

fro¡<br />

the 7ij ðlphafloc måintenance diet,<br />

TT ÍD OT COLL]JCTION<br />

Ptq lüui Ðr,rlt<br />

Âii.[No<br />

^crDs<br />

Ðss ----htõ- sntial<br />

ftls<br />

rUtì<br />

LËU<br />

t͡T<br />

PII.lrj<br />

Tlill<br />

i//\L<br />

l;on-lìssential<br />

.{L/r<br />

A5P<br />

CLU<br />

GLÏ<br />

Pn0<br />

SdI¿<br />

TÏI¿<br />

.0u<br />

.036<br />

.o56<br />

. ol+o<br />

.or7<br />

.03 5<br />

.o4t<br />

'olrz<br />

.o52<br />

.o¿¿<br />

.100<br />

.040<br />

.ot+I<br />

.041<br />

.026<br />

T.IIT:tOG]4N .Il+3 .r27<br />

ET]TORII C1IREAL T1,IS1 DIATS<br />

.o25 ,016 .Ot6 .021 .O2L .0l.6<br />

.007 .007 .OO7 .OO7 .OOC .OOB<br />

,o32 .O21 .018 .026 .OlO ,O2_5<br />

.o45 .026 ,O2?, .041 ,Or+9 .0lO<br />

,925 .O25 .O2r+ ,O)3 .O¿rO .028<br />

.011+ .oa1 .00e ,or2 .013 .009<br />

.o2-7 .016 .018 .026 .O2ç ,019<br />

.0.11 .019 ,02I .026 .O32 ,O2)<br />

.o35 ,o22 .O22 .O32 .Oi? .O27<br />

,oÐ .o27 .O29 .0À0 .ot,i .Ol3<br />

.06¿ .oLj .aB .062 .aò9 .or1<br />

.o9L .064 .o55 .o75 .o¿i9 .o7t)<br />

.o35 .O72 ,O2t+ ,O32 .036 .Ozt+<br />

.o3) .O2' .O2r+ .o2? .oi) .026<br />

.o4o .02'3 .oz2 .o29 .o3'j .o3U<br />

.o22 .O1.2 .oli .ol8 .929 , ,012<br />

.7O2 .094<br />

.111<br />

.109<br />

.013<br />

.006<br />

,033<br />

,o37<br />

.o72<br />

.020<br />

.026<br />

.03 \.<br />

,035<br />

.o57<br />

.10ó<br />

.026<br />

.033<br />

,o+6<br />

. 01¡+<br />

ÄFTER CDRII\L Tì'S1' DIETS<br />

.ozl<br />

,008<br />

,o2g<br />

,ol+2<br />

.036<br />

.013<br />

.o2r<br />

.o3l<br />

.033<br />

'ol+2<br />

,06t*<br />

.078<br />

.033<br />

.o26<br />

. 031<br />

.019<br />

. 015<br />

.00í)<br />

.o23<br />

,o29<br />

,o23<br />

. otl<br />

,017<br />

.o2L<br />

.02t,<br />

.028<br />

.0/+6<br />

.07r<br />

,o23<br />

.o28<br />

.429<br />

. oll<br />

.111 .L26 ,10r .110<br />

,or7 .o2)<br />

.007 .009<br />

.o25 .036<br />

.a)2 .ot,5<br />

.OZ(t ,O3?<br />

,oI2 .OI7<br />

.018 .o25<br />

.o23 .otj<br />

.026 .q)<br />

.030 ,olr2<br />

.ot+9 .o74<br />

.A7 t+ .111<br />

.o24 .o33<br />

.o2t .q6<br />

.o3? ,0r¡ó<br />

,01t ,020<br />

'II+7<br />

N)


AP-)lliDlll TAllLf l?. 'ihe in{tividual ¡rrctabolic faecal a¡rino acid ând ni¿ro0en excrction fro¡¡l<br />

pigs fed the 14la alphafìoc r¡lâintenance diets'<br />

TI lri OÌ' 1j0l],ri0'1':toN<br />

PTG NIJÌ.J'rijl¿<br />

/\IiINO ACTDS<br />

!¡e3r!j.e]<br />

IITS<br />

ILd<br />

LJJU<br />

PIIE<br />

TIIII<br />

V.At<br />

llon-issential<br />

-.4_î-i-<br />

3Lti<br />

r'l¿0<br />

sliiì.<br />

lYn<br />

.o29<br />

.013<br />

.038<br />

.o56<br />

.ol+7<br />

.03 5<br />

,ot+o<br />

.o47<br />

.o59<br />

.088<br />

.109<br />

.o47<br />

.04.0<br />

.0/+r<br />

.o26<br />

r;TT.ì0cntii .L65 .Ì80<br />

tiEItoR[ CLnjiAL D]lil'll<br />

.ol0 .o33 .023<br />

.oto .010 .003<br />

,OLr2 .Ot+L ,O33<br />

.069 .062 .o52<br />

.ot 9 .050 .041<br />

.018 .018 .013<br />

.o39 .o)7 .o33<br />

.ot+5 .o52 .o39<br />

,0r*8 .o52 ,AL3<br />

,060 .070 .o52<br />

.09r .094 .o77<br />

,r11 .I)4 . ro0<br />

.0&¿j .o55 .otv)<br />

.o39 .04.r . o/+/+<br />

.o\.2 .olr7 .439<br />

.026 .o29 ,O23<br />

. 161<br />

.032<br />

.008<br />

. 03lr<br />

.o55<br />

.o39<br />

. ot5<br />

.433<br />

. o[0<br />

,o42<br />

.Ol+9<br />

.079<br />

,095<br />

, ot*o<br />

.o43<br />

.039<br />

.025<br />

.tÌ+5<br />

.ol8 .o2o .o29<br />

.0t5 .oo9 .0Ì4-<br />

.or+5 .o32 .045<br />

.065 .o43 .06rr<br />

.o55 .q6 .o55<br />

.o1B .Ot7 .026<br />

.o)7 .o25 ,o35<br />

.or+3 .031 .OL)<br />

,o57 .o35 .0i0<br />

.o5B .043 .066<br />

.099 .o74 . 09¿'<br />

.I:,2 .096 . rlq<br />

.oL5 .o32 .04 6<br />

.oiz ,o3? .Otç3<br />

,o52 .o37 .o53.<br />

.o2¿ ,o2o .426<br />

,205<br />

.2t l<br />

AFTEn CDRllrtL DI]jTS<br />

.o27 .028<br />

.olt .or2<br />

.o35 .o32<br />

.050 .ot+5<br />

.o)9 .o42<br />

.o22 .015<br />

.010 .026<br />

.o37 .031<br />

.o39 .o37<br />

. o5o ,o\t+<br />

.0114 , o7o<br />

.09ri .o93<br />

. o3B .o3 t+<br />

.021 .03 0<br />

.otl . otl<br />

.o3) .o|g<br />

.04_t .081<br />

,o37 .060<br />

.013 ,O2tl<br />

.ozt* .a+4<br />

.026 .O59<br />

.o34 .O'i 1*<br />

. orr0 .076<br />

.06rþ ,I)9<br />

.lo4 .Lt+L<br />

.03 r .o59<br />

.o)9 .031<br />

.o3'Ì .o37<br />

,o22 .O20<br />

.04.0 .o52<br />

,0114 .o55<br />

.0rl . ol4.<br />

.166 .L62 .IL9 ,207<br />

N)


APP¡jl'{DIX TAELI¡ 18<br />

Source of' Vari-ation<br />

Degrees of Freedorn<br />

rTEltS<br />

l.litrogen retained (e;/d"v )<br />

ltritrogen retainecll<br />

I\itrogen retention (Íi ) 2<br />

Diological vatue (î3 )3<br />

I, 2, 3 As shov¡n in Table 28.<br />

x (n(0.05 )<br />

.ftnalyses of variance betr"¡een treattûents I'or pararneters<br />

rrteasured in study 3a.<br />

ROlJS<br />

(Prcs )<br />

2<br />

o.7647<br />

o.CIoz?34<br />

Lþ ,427 5<br />

5.6t+59<br />

COLU'iNS<br />

( PEIìIOÐS )<br />

2<br />

(ltean squares )<br />

1.3803<br />

o.001269<br />

r.Q)14<br />

8.4700<br />

TIìilATitrlNTS<br />

4.624t+x<br />

o.orl537<br />

62.5195x<br />

7B.L2tþ5x<br />

LltROn<br />

t<br />

o.22:-6<br />

0.000698<br />

r.1611<br />

r.6782<br />

N


APPDNDI"( 1Âlj],Ë 19 The indtvidual apparent iLeaJ- and faecal amino acid availabilities<br />

from wLgle wheat in study ¿la, in addition to nitro6en and dry<br />

nratter digestibilities and average daily dry natter intake.<br />

D¡.]<br />

PlC NUIIBðN<br />

L0c^Ttol{<br />

Át{rNc.4crDS (.1)<br />

-lRc- Ðssentiel<br />

8?.2<br />

Hrs 88.6<br />

rLE 89.r<br />

LIU 89.7<br />

LYS 80.2<br />

rar %.6<br />

P E 90.9<br />

T¡IR ?9.O<br />

v.¡ìL r]6.1<br />

l\"on-lssential<br />

--ìr-ì- no )<br />

ÄsP ¿r,tl<br />

cLU 95.8<br />

c¿Y 69.9<br />

PRO BO, d<br />

ùlllr o), I<br />

TTR 87,9<br />

N rrRocEi'r (ii) tì4.7<br />

DRY I.:1ìTTEn (,J ) ?B.o<br />

DIìY ¡;ATT¡;II L)67<br />

IN1¡KD (s/day )<br />

12-r8<br />

ILüUi'i FAÊCìJS ILLUÌ.I FA¡JCÌiS TLÌ'UÌ.J FIrUCTS IL.ITJUI'I FÂIOì¡S ]iÙUi i<br />

94.1 88. ó<br />

93.4 89.8<br />

9r.6 90.6<br />

92.8 91.0<br />

86.1 ',¿r.z<br />

93.7 93 .t+<br />

93 .5 9r.6<br />

88.8 ?8.6<br />

9r.,3 86.9<br />

8¿,4 80.9<br />

87 .3 81. I<br />

97.8 95.9<br />

9O.2 7 5.8<br />

96.5 t:5.7<br />

%.7 â6.9<br />

92. r+ 89.2<br />

93.o 86.6<br />

89.2 8o.4<br />

1367<br />

9rr.3 89,4<br />

9?.5 89.7<br />

91.8 90.4<br />

93.3 90.9<br />

r)7 .o dl.ó<br />

9l+.2 92.9<br />

9t+.I 92.2<br />

89,6 {rr.4<br />

91.9 8B,2<br />

8{J.8 83.4<br />

88.6 84-. r<br />

97.9 96.3<br />

91.0 111.2<br />

97.6 92.5<br />

24.o É18.&<br />

93 .2 ',ég .7<br />

%.6 í18. o<br />

89.9 78.9<br />

) t+- t+o<br />

9r*.2 85.9<br />

91+.O 85.9<br />

ti9.8 85.2<br />

2?.2 . t)4. ¿<br />

29.7 ( z.o<br />

go.1 8¡j. i*<br />

93 ,6 89.7<br />

¿l¿,.1 73,7<br />

90.3 Bl.¿l<br />

gr+.0 , 86.?<br />

9t,,5 BB.2<br />

g2.o 89.6<br />

')).r 2o.2<br />

35.9 Bo. r<br />

94.o 94.t+<br />

gt+.6 92.2<br />

¿J8.ri 7d.1<br />

9r,7 87.6<br />

55-62<br />

rÂUCDS fLiluli ¡'Aiciris<br />

95.1 81.7 9L.{)<br />

94.9 88.,1 91..5<br />

92.8 89.5 9L,5<br />

94.0 9o.5 9).2<br />

87.6 81.0 ۓ6. o<br />

95.4 9r.9 9).L<br />

95.) 92.5 94,5<br />

9O.7 79.8 {19. o<br />

93 .6 rJ? .9 91 .6<br />

85.t+ 75,6 8d.2 78.8 90.0 79.5 87.9<br />

86.3 76.5 87.7 79.7 89.9 81.5 8Û,0<br />

97,7 9t+.5 97.9 95.4 9¡l.r 95.8 97.9<br />

89.8 76.t+ 90.6 65.5 9r.5 66.7 9A.6<br />

9t+,i 9r.5 97.O 59.5 9ri.1 5r+.5 96,6<br />

93 .3 63 .8 95 ,6 Û5 .9 95 .3 87 .o 9r¡.r<br />

9r,2 86.6 92.7 9o,9 94.8 9r.o 92.9<br />

92.6 Ei+. r %,r 8l+,r 9t+.5 83.6 93,1ç<br />

89. ¿ 75.,¿ 30.6 77.r Ë9.5 7 8.9 89.3<br />

16¿*O r72L<br />

L53A<br />

¡\)<br />

c¡.


ÂPP¿NDL( fÁirltl 20. The individual apparent ileal aDcl faecal arnino acid<br />

availabilit,lcs fro¡r flour in sl¡tdy ¿r_a, in addilrion<br />

to nitrogen and drl, xutter diðestíbilíties ¿nd<br />

averate dai.ly drl, ¡natler intake.<br />

D,{Y<br />

PIG NUÌ tìl ¿1ì<br />

LOCITTON<br />

ÂrrJNo<br />

^crDs (i¿ )<br />

_¡fõ- Essentiel<br />

Hrs<br />

ÏLË<br />

Litt<br />

92.5<br />

% .,¿<br />

93 .1<br />

gtr.a<br />

i-¿T 92.6<br />

TflR<br />

vAL<br />

,).1<br />

83,B<br />

9r.?,<br />

IJon-Essential<br />

lL^ 86.6<br />

ÁsP 8ru.1<br />

cLU 97.6<br />

cLY 86.9<br />

PRo 96.2<br />

Sln 9I.t+<br />

Trn 92.6<br />

rrrrnocIJl (,,i) 9r.7<br />

DnY r (ii) 9A.7<br />

^TTJR<br />

DnÏ l:¡TTilì 13 53<br />

Il;1¡l{r (ff/day )<br />

12-1d<br />

3t -to<br />

FAJCDS IL,]Uì,I IAECDS IL]lUIi FAECI'S IL¡]¡Jìì FA1TCES<br />

2^2.7 ?2.2 97.o 9g.L 95..r s2.? e6.3 q9.? e6.8 86J e4.?<br />

9^t!.2 9t+.o<br />

9^?.?<br />

97.7 e\.9 26.5 Þ+.2 gz.o<br />

%.h 9r.8 9tt.tt<br />

sL.z sz.1 s;:i si.s<br />

,-\.5 9r+.7 gtr.6 Çs.+ 2\.? se.s 9i.i e2.?<br />

?tr.4 95.1 25.2 95.T it*,t, i:6.i g5.r gz.l gi:õ el ?<br />

Be., 19-? ¡rr.B 9\.3 85.o úi.i iò.i ír'¿:, qtr:7 go.'o 6i:i áâ:ó<br />

%.\ 26.r et+.5 )9., )3.o ,t.l 2Z.Z 21.\ ei.ó %.2<br />

22'9 )-2'¿ e7.o %.L g'.L ei.i ii.í 29.2 2i.z i.6.ó 2t+.7<br />

2\.? 9\.3 e4.3 65.0 9r.e \L.i eà.t 87.4 9t+.8 ez.t 8d:ó<br />

)).o )2.2 95.5 %.1. s4.2 92.4 ti:o 93,3 96,3 %.i g¡.s<br />

89. ¡ 86, t )3.2<br />

¡Jó.9 E7 ,o 92.5<br />

98.4 97.9 9È.9<br />

92.7 83 .6 95.2<br />

)8. r+ 96.5 9s.6<br />

91.7 9r.4 97.o<br />

93.5 92.9 96.2<br />

94.6 91.I 96.8<br />

th.g 90 .5 95 .7<br />

r285<br />

35,7 9O.5 87.2<br />

85.8 8S,4. a>.?<br />

97..9 9t,.(, 9?,?<br />

'Ì6.6 93.3 85.5<br />

76.1 9{}.3 9t+.2<br />

9t.l 95.7 9r.8<br />

93 .5 93 .t 92.?<br />

39.6 95.2 92.5<br />

90.0 9L. t+ 90.4<br />

I5t+2 1621,<br />

92.2 85.6<br />

90.2 84,?<br />

9t.6 98.0<br />

9+.r 69,6<br />

98. t 73 .t+<br />

96.2 92.3<br />

9L 3 9r*.3<br />

96.2 89,6<br />

95.2 90. t+<br />

1550<br />

56-62<br />

TLDUIT FAECBS ILEU¡I FAICOS<br />

93 , 8 8t+.7 86 ,?<br />

92,4 ¿5.5 8t, -e<br />

99.I 98.0 9d, ó<br />

95.6 69; 90.8<br />

99.r 6r.7 98.0<br />

97,) 92,O 9L.o<br />

96,] 92.8 Ð.3<br />

96 .1 87 .6 94,6<br />

95 .6 89 .5 9l .8<br />

1550<br />

¡\)<br />

{


' 238<br />

APPENDTX ÎABLE 21. Tbe indlviduel epparear ileal and faecal<br />

anino acid availabilities from the B+S+M<br />

diet -in study ,+, Ín additÍon to nitrogen<br />

and dry natter digestibilities and<br />

êveragê daily dry nattêr intake.<br />

DAY 12-18 3l+-t+o 23-29<br />

PIG NI]I{BER<br />

LocÂtr0¡¡ IIEUII{ FÅECES ILEI}M FAECES ]I,EUM FAECES<br />

AMINo ACrm (ø)<br />

Essential<br />

-æG-- â6.5<br />

Hrs 81.,<br />

ILE 73.L<br />

IE-q 75.3 .<br />

Lrs 72.O'<br />

MET 73.5<br />

PHE 75.3<br />

rHR 53.9<br />

vAt 72.9<br />

Non-Essential<br />

ALA 69.9<br />

ASP 68.9<br />

GLt 86.i+<br />

GLY 67.L<br />

PRo 7L.5<br />

sEB 7L.8<br />

TTR 7L.3<br />

NITROGEN (ø) 7L.3<br />

DRT IITATTER (ø) I+3.6<br />

DRT ¡iÍATTER . 659<br />

I¡¡TAKE (e/day')<br />

92.L 8l}. r] gg.8<br />

9\.7 78.2 ÈZ.t+<br />

76.9 75.L 73 .4<br />

qr.3 76.9 76.9<br />

80.3 63.9 72.6<br />

q1.0 80.9 8O.?<br />

81.5 ?8.8 ?8,7<br />

7.r.3 60.5 69. j<br />

80.5 73.3 76.6<br />

78,6<br />

7È.9<br />

90.9<br />

80.0<br />

9L.l+<br />

Ê5.L<br />

81.2<br />

81.4<br />

66.L<br />

7L.O<br />

7L.2<br />

86.6<br />

t+9.6<br />

5?.8<br />

7t+.5<br />

7l+.o<br />

69.4<br />

I+5.8<br />

737<br />

75.7<br />

7l+,2<br />

89.7<br />

77.2<br />

86.9<br />

82.5<br />

77.7<br />

è3.5<br />

76.L<br />

70.5<br />

7L.L<br />

63.t+<br />

79.O<br />

7t+.0<br />

t+7.5<br />

68.t+<br />

69.8<br />

69.t+<br />

Èl+.5<br />

55.3<br />

78.6<br />

70.3<br />

68.1<br />

88.7<br />

87.5<br />

73.6<br />

77.9<br />

73.5<br />

83.8<br />

78.3<br />

69.L<br />

7L.L<br />

72.r<br />

73.8<br />

è9.2<br />

77.9<br />

90.3<br />

81.6<br />

77.t+<br />

d1.3 68.6 80.1<br />

65.6 t+o.5 63.3<br />

1168


APPENDIX TABIE, 22. The lndivlduaL appæént llea1 and faecal anl.no acid<br />

ave11abl1it,l6s fro¡n dlet B+S+M-D frorn study 4a, ln<br />

addltlon to nitrogen and dry nâtter dlgestlbtlltles<br />

and averege daily dry natter lntake.<br />

PIG MJMBER<br />

LOCATION<br />

ÀMrNo ACrD (ø)<br />

II,E<br />

I,EU<br />

LIs<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

75.7<br />

7L.8<br />

67.9<br />

7L.3<br />

53.6<br />

70. o<br />

72.5<br />

,+7 .o<br />

6b,5<br />

vAt<br />

Non-Essêntla1 --]Ã-lÃ-- 59.9<br />

ÂsP 6).3<br />

cLU 84.8<br />

GLY 5O.7<br />

. PRo 27.r<br />

sER 69,7<br />

TYR 66.5<br />

NITROGEN (ø) 62.9<br />

DRY MÀTTER (ø} 69.7<br />

DRT IITÂTTER L'86<br />

INTÀKE (e/dav l<br />

6? -?3<br />

67-73<br />

II,EU¡i,I FAECES IIEI'M FAECES TI,EUM TÂECES<br />

77.r 8.8.7 7o.? qg.8 2q.9 9.).3 74,1 91.4 73.L so.2<br />

Z\.2 91.Q z?.6 8ç.7 9Ê.? sB.? z6.8 ¿s.j ä.o áó:i<br />

70.4 68.0 70.3 76.' 6.2.2 7.7.2 67.9 77.3 72.o 7tr.2<br />

4.q 75.? 73.o 81.8 69.5 q2.9 ?o.i âà.-â it,.z ¿Jó:ö<br />

58..s Zz.s 60.3 zT.L 5.3.1 90.5 ,ç.\ gl.t<br />

79.7 64,' 79.o<br />

0á.g<br />

7\.2 â5.0 80.1 70.0 tà,i, i5:t<br />

ii.6<br />

6'..1<br />

72." 7r,9 74.1 92.2 7tr.7 83,5 ?2.5 ú.6 it.9 8i.6<br />

+ç.6 68.7<br />

6ê.e 40.e 7r,Z 42.r Zi.i iS.i 1i.6 i3.'8 7t+.2<br />

72.9 66.0 79.6 63.r ¿0.5 66.L 79.5 i'o.' i{.b<br />

65.6<br />

66.2<br />

8r.8<br />

t+6 .6<br />

t r.9<br />

69.r<br />

7L.7<br />

66.8<br />

70.7<br />

Lt+78<br />

70.5 60.9 78.L<br />

73.7 65.t ?9.2<br />

8d.6 8,+.j 9L.5<br />

75.5 25,6 80.r+<br />

73.o -93.5 78.5<br />

80.4 ó6.1 85.O<br />

72.8 70.L 78.2<br />

81.3 55.7 84.¡r<br />

83.6 66.ê 8t,.2<br />

I663<br />

l+9.9<br />

56.5<br />

81.O<br />

-7 .O<br />

-rsL,7<br />

63.5<br />

69.6<br />

4t.9<br />

68.5<br />

1818<br />

78.6 6L.7 79.O 66.3 7r.r¿<br />

8o.5 61.9 80.3 68.r¡ tz.e<br />

2?.4 gq.g<br />

83.1 92.L 85.5 9o.r<br />

40.6 Bt.6 j5,2<br />

qq.o i6.g<br />

-39't+ 79.5 -39.9 78.t<br />

q6.l 07.o 86.3 7L.5 8¡+.4<br />

83.6 6L.j 8z.o ¿;8.i zé.i,<br />

q4.1 58.5 8t'.2 6z.L 82.2<br />

84.2 69,.7 83.8 0g.g 83.6<br />

t756 t756<br />

N<br />

\o


APPLNDII T^ÐLit 23. The individual ¡netabolic iLeêl ¡ìnd faecêl _amino êcid, nitroqen<br />

and dry matter levels from pigs fed the 5,, alphafloc proLein-free<br />

diets, in €dditíon to averêge dêill1 dry matter intêke.<br />

DlY<br />

PIG NUI1BDN<br />

LOC,|\TION<br />

^l;tNo ActDsl<br />

ns sentÍêL -lre-<br />

¡lts<br />

ILf,<br />

LnLr<br />

.026<br />

.011<br />

. OIó<br />

.o2g<br />

r,ET<br />

PH_¡<br />

iR<br />

\¡^L<br />

Non- issêntie1<br />

--ìlTl--lrsP<br />

cïs<br />

cLU<br />

cLY<br />

PRo<br />

siR<br />

TYR<br />

.005<br />

,018<br />

.a33<br />

.O28<br />

ôro<br />

.ot+4<br />

,011<br />

.O5)<br />

.066<br />

.220<br />

.0lo<br />

.011<br />

liITnocÙllt "<br />

.Iz3<br />

DNY I.ATTJR, TA.26<br />

DIY l.lLTTliR 1368<br />

IlllÂrìi (¡/d¿y )<br />

rl.iiul: Fr',ocris<br />

,02)<br />

.012<br />

, ol0<br />

.ol+7<br />

. 04o<br />

.014<br />

.03)<br />

.0t0<br />

.0ó6<br />

.009<br />

.07Ê<br />

.o27<br />

, 110<br />

6.98<br />

,026 ,o22<br />

.011 , Ot 1<br />

,ot9 .030<br />

.435 .Orv5<br />

.o27 .019<br />

. 005 .01,1<br />

,020 .oze<br />

.o33 .o32<br />

.o27 .O3 5<br />

ô1r.<br />

^2 ô<br />

,ot*z ,a6rt<br />

.011 .009<br />

.0óo .o72<br />

.a78 .031<br />

. 146 ,ozt+<br />

.a32 .026<br />

2) -29<br />

I t,etnbolic ileal and faec¿1 anj.no acj.d lave1s Ì¡ere exFressed es g¡âns pcr Ì00 ¡¡rams<br />

of dry matter intake.<br />

.015<br />

,038<br />

,028<br />

.005<br />

.o22<br />

.0/+3<br />

.o)2<br />

.04e<br />

.060<br />

.013<br />

.6t*6<br />

.044<br />

.013 .015 .012<br />

.130 ,104 .252<br />

\.L2 6,56 1r .ë.5 6<br />

rló8 164z<br />

57<br />

.¡<br />

: S IL¡IUII FÂIìCES ILÌtUi: F^]]c,;s<br />

^ECi<br />

,019<br />

.010<br />

.o25<br />

.929<br />

.93+<br />

,010<br />

.o2+<br />

.o29<br />

.o32<br />

,03I .024r .061r , o2O<br />

;016 .o!2 .016 .OrO<br />

,O25 .)33 .O2I .A2+<br />

.9117 .ot+9 .o37 .018<br />

.010 .040 .oz-t .o))<br />

.005 ,010 .007 .ot1<br />

.o2¿ .O29 .O?-3 ,O23<br />

.o45 .o)5 .o)? .026<br />

.03¡, ,018 .o32 .o2g<br />

.083 .A2I<br />

,01¡ .009<br />

,A26 ,A22<br />

.0¡|.6 .ú6<br />

.o29 .a3)<br />

.oo? .oii<br />

,026 .o2?-<br />

.o4.2 .026<br />

.Oàg .o27<br />

,034<br />

.a5ê.<br />

.011<br />

.063<br />

.03 0<br />

.o)2<br />

.a25<br />

,oo8<br />

,090<br />

.0¿lo .0r*0<br />

.062 .069<br />

.013 .01r<br />

,o77 .o7?<br />

.o?9 .o))<br />

.2ra .031<br />

.03 8 .028<br />

.0I7 .012<br />

.161 .1r1<br />

.01*8<br />

.011r<br />

.07)<br />

'69t<br />

.0t 9<br />

,012<br />

.o29<br />

.05 $<br />

,011<br />

.o6t<br />

.o2B<br />

ôrt<br />

.424<br />

.018<br />

.095<br />

,050 .C3?"<br />

,067 .o51,,<br />

.01¿¡ . Olt<br />

.oet .a5f<br />

.zlt .A26<br />

õ'\ a<br />

.Arr5 .A23<br />

.015 .Ot6<br />

.31t .095<br />

,69 rl.ll 6,2r<br />

r6l+2<br />

12,93<br />

r6r,2<br />

15.5I<br />

6,3tr. r?,.La 6.0?,<br />

r6t+2-<br />

N)


ÂPPENDIX ?ABLE 24. Thê lndtviduql mstabolLc llêal and feecal amino acld,<br />

nllrogen and dry mattêr lev€1a fro4 pigs fed thè<br />

l0Ø alphafloc proteLn-free dlêb, In eddLtion to<br />

êvoraeê da1ly dry nâtter <strong>fn</strong>tåkè.<br />

DAT<br />

PIG NII1IBER<br />

I,OCÂTION<br />

.026 .041<br />

,01, ,0r9<br />

.o35 .o39<br />

.o53 .065<br />

,044 .046<br />

,015 .012<br />

.o)4 .o39<br />

.o35 .O55<br />

.Ol+t .O5,<br />

.o¡+ó .o55<br />

.o75 .085<br />

.011 .019<br />

.065 .110<br />

.o38 .111<br />

.038 ,'-3'.<br />

.o3o ,0r+6<br />

.013 .019<br />

.L26 .203<br />

LO.32 t7,I5<br />

1102<br />

56-62<br />

.otl<br />

.062<br />

.01¡l<br />

,o27 .0[6<br />

.0r5<br />

.o28 .062 .o?o .992 .g?g .0|,6 ,034<br />

,912 ..ói<br />

.oãó .ojö .óri .92? :i¡;z<br />

.oz2 .oi4<br />

:ðiT .ozs<br />

.oLi .oiã<br />

.o,+o<br />

:õíõ<br />

.9?9 .95e_ .9,,2 .950 .o3d .o¡Z<br />

.06õ :òãô .or4 .o55 .06r .olL<br />

:331 :3î3 :332 :3?? '3:d :2!t :ói¿ :óiá :õðô :ð;o<br />

.o2l+ .038 .o2t+<br />

.e4¿ .o¡z .ord :ili :Bãå Åh Ål¿i :"e3+ :Sãf :sie<br />

.031 .o5o .o3e .0Àr i .o5o .otl6 :óÀd .õ'íi :õiô :ói6<br />

.049 .or7 .044 .9tÌ2<br />

,962 .odz .066 .968<br />

' .Eg .ot¡, .063 .056 .063 .066<br />

.013 .013 ,Ol4<br />

.oÞt .oei :óÉ6 .o1¿ :ósá liör<br />

.OLz<br />

.069<br />

.Iqq<br />

.10o<br />

.oLi<br />

.o8o<br />

.L,+3<br />

.g?9<br />

.92'1 .10?<br />

.ãso<br />

.o9g<br />

:oLt .azz<br />

,1oo<br />

.otõ<br />

,083<br />

:i¿i_<br />

.ro7 .ii¡<br />

.õiz<br />

:3ä :3i3 :ðu 'åi: ,iil 'Ëåã .Ê21 'åiã ttf,f :ilZ<br />

.011 .016 .012<br />

--rr'.1tno ,o:Lî' -_.rg'.î?8 ,o:LL6 ,g'.228 ,ollåt ,sl33o ,olå?n ,r'.31, ,olält<br />

1561 L56L ,1040 r¿ié l|i'dd'-'<br />

tù<br />

H


APPENDIX TABLE 25.<br />

PIG NUMBER<br />

LOCATION<br />

AMINO ACTDS<br />

EssentlaL<br />

HIS<br />

II,E<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

-trÏÃ'--<br />

ASP<br />

cYs<br />

GLÜ<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

.050<br />

.013<br />

.026<br />

.050<br />

.o29<br />

.o10<br />

.o2g<br />

.o55<br />

.o39<br />

.050<br />

.073<br />

.01_8<br />

.084<br />

.L52<br />

.l+l+4<br />

.otû<br />

. oL3<br />

The tndtvidual ¡netabolic t1eal and faecal ar¡lno acidnitrogen<br />

and dry natter l_evels from piEs fed the<br />

L5% alphafLoc protein-free dlets, 1n-aãditton to<br />

average datly dry matter intake. -<br />

L-7<br />

NTTROGENI . .233<br />

DRT MATTERT 25.3t+ t5<br />

DRY PIATTER ?3O<br />

INTAKE (elaavl<br />

FAECES<br />

.o3z<br />

.01ó<br />

.orÌ3<br />

.063<br />

.o52<br />

.o28<br />

,o3d<br />

.o[r<br />

'or+9<br />

1 M"t.bolic i1eal and faecal levels<br />

intake.<br />

.061<br />

,o25<br />

.o3o<br />

.o52<br />

.o39<br />

. olr+<br />

.ozd<br />

,Ol+7<br />

.o39<br />

05l+<br />

088<br />

019<br />

o99<br />

0¡+3<br />

035<br />

035<br />

016<br />

.061<br />

.074<br />

.021<br />

.o97<br />

.L7lr<br />

.76L<br />

.055<br />

.0111<br />

L53<br />

27<br />

.281+<br />

26 .74<br />

L277<br />

t 5-5L<br />

r2-18<br />

.q?9 .0?1 .026 .084<br />

.914 .Ozt+ .013 .O29<br />

. O49 .031+ .Ot+? . 03ô<br />

,o7-2 .064 .063 .O1z<br />

. qó9 .046 .0,Ì5 .oit,<br />

.o2L<br />

.q44 .otû .ot+3 .gtl<br />

. q51 .O77 .Ot+? .Oi3<br />

.o59 .O52 .O57 .O59<br />

.068<br />

.!,07<br />

.oL5<br />

.L20<br />

'o5z<br />

.Olrz<br />

.o39<br />

.o23<br />

.L72<br />

L3.6t+<br />

.063<br />

.098<br />

.116<br />

.L82<br />

./,167<br />

.063<br />

. o21<br />

.272<br />

25.59<br />

LLOT<br />

.063<br />

.o92<br />

.ll_t<br />

.o53<br />

'otrz<br />

,o37<br />

.oL5<br />

.164<br />

t5.57<br />

rI,EI]M<br />

.067<br />

,o93<br />

3L-LO<br />

FAECES<br />

.o33<br />

.0r7<br />

.0r+5<br />

.o72<br />

-o¡o<br />

.o37<br />

.Or+4<br />

. o5o<br />

.055<br />

.o99<br />

.L25 .105<br />

.180 .o45<br />

.635 .038<br />

.061 .036<br />

.o23 .oL7<br />

.306 ,L53<br />

28.Lt+ L5 .27<br />

L532<br />

vtere .expressed as grans per LOO grams of dry matter<br />

N


APPENDIX TABLE 26. Analyses of variance: Mean aquares for apparent iLeal and faecalamlno<br />

acid availabllities, nitrogen and dry matter dlgest,ibilities<br />

fron finely ground and cracked wheat for sùudy lrb.<br />

Source of<br />

varlation<br />

Degrees of<br />

freedom<br />

AMTNO .A.CTDS<br />

Essential<br />

--rñG'-<br />

HIS<br />

rLE<br />

I,EU<br />

lrs<br />

MET<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

--¡m'--<br />

.{sP<br />

GLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYP"<br />

NITNOGEN<br />

DRT MATTER<br />

x<br />

xx<br />

(P


APPENDIÏ TABLE 27. Tle indivídual apparenü ileal and faecal anino acid availablLiries<br />

of ground_wheat fro¡n-study_l¿b, Ln additfon to nitrogen and dry<br />

matter dlgestlbilities and average daily dry matt,ei lntake.<br />

DAY<br />

PIG NUT4BER<br />

T.,OCATTON<br />

AMINo AcrDS (ø)<br />

Essentlal<br />

*ãnil-<br />

HIS<br />

ILE<br />

I,EU<br />

LYS<br />

¡[ET<br />

PHE<br />

THN<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essentlal<br />

-:a-f,î--<br />

ASP<br />

GT,U<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

9L.7<br />

90.I<br />

90.6<br />

92,L<br />

?8.7<br />

87.3<br />

93.3<br />

83.8<br />

89.<br />

NITROGEN (%) 89.1<br />

DRY MATTEN (%) 8]..1<br />

DRY MATTER 1830<br />

INTAKE 1s/davl<br />

'*<br />

82.8<br />

83.2<br />

96.tþ<br />

85.1<br />

90.3<br />

89.6<br />

90.2<br />

FAECES<br />

93.o 90. o 95.2<br />

23. ,1, 89. tl 95 . t+<br />

88.6 89.8 93.1t<br />

91.0 90.6 9U.2<br />

81.2 80.3 88.r<br />

86.+ +Z.t 90. j<br />

91..8 gz.L 9r+.6<br />

86.0 87.7 91.O<br />

88.9 87.5 93.2<br />

82.6 8r.8 90.1<br />

8lr. o 82.6 89.6<br />

97.3 96.3 98.2<br />

87.5 78.9 91.8<br />

9t+.6 86.3 9?.L<br />

9tr.5 87.O 9r+.2<br />

88.1 88.0 92.O<br />

9?.0 87.tr grr.3<br />

BB.3 79.t+ 89.r<br />

1830<br />

78-8U<br />

FAECES II,EI'M<br />

95.O<br />

93,6<br />

90. r<br />

9L.9<br />

8z.r<br />

90.4<br />

93.2<br />

83.0<br />

89.r-<br />

82.3<br />

82.8<br />

92.2<br />

81.6<br />

80.7<br />

88.0<br />

9L.5<br />

88.à<br />

80.1<br />

20Ir5<br />

FAECES<br />

95.L<br />

9l+.8<br />

92.6<br />

9I1.1<br />

86.7<br />

90.1<br />

9l+.6<br />

89,9<br />

92.6<br />

89.5<br />

89. O<br />

98.0<br />

91.1<br />

97.5<br />

9t+.3<br />

92.1+<br />

94.2<br />

89.2<br />

FAECES<br />

9L.3 9t+.2<br />

90. Ê 9tr.2<br />

9O.2 90.l}<br />

9r.7 92.3<br />

79.7 85.5<br />

87.2 88.6<br />

93.O 93.L<br />

80.3 88.0<br />

88.5 90.4<br />

8L.6<br />

82.6<br />

96.L<br />

8r.r+<br />

80. d<br />

88.3<br />

89.5<br />

8d.8<br />

8r. o<br />

2L53<br />

86.1<br />

86.8<br />

97.8<br />

89.8<br />

9t*.5<br />

93.3<br />

90.r1<br />

93.t+<br />

88.8<br />

¡ù


APPENDIÏ TABLE 28. . The indlvidual apparent ileal- and faecaL amino acld avaiLabilitles<br />

of cracked vüheat fron study l¡b, in addition to nltrogen and dry<br />

matter digestibilitles and average daily dry matter intake.<br />

DAY<br />

PTG NU}IBEÊ<br />

LOCATION<br />

AMINO ACIDS (ø}<br />

Ess ential<br />

HIS<br />

IIE<br />

LEU<br />

LYS<br />

I\MT<br />

PHE<br />

THR<br />

VAL<br />

Non-Essential<br />

ALA<br />

ASP<br />

OLU<br />

GLY<br />

PRO<br />

SER<br />

TYR<br />

86.8<br />

gtr.z<br />

81.8<br />

85. o<br />

6t+.o<br />

78.7<br />

87.8<br />

78.8<br />

79.3<br />

66.6<br />

7t.7<br />

93.3<br />

7Iþ.5<br />

87.t+<br />

83.6<br />

82.2<br />

NITROGEN (ø) 82.?<br />

DRT MATTER (ø) ?6.?<br />

DRT MATTER 2L6?<br />

INTAKE 1gldar)<br />

FAECES<br />

TI,EUM<br />

93.9 85.5<br />

93.5 85 .5<br />

89.3 85.L<br />

91.8 87 ,7<br />

82.? ?2.L<br />

8?,6 82.9<br />

93.o 89.6<br />

86.1 76.7<br />

90.6 83.r<br />

85.3<br />

85 .8<br />

97.5<br />

89.9<br />

95.L<br />

92.4<br />

89.4<br />

92.7<br />

88.8<br />

73.2<br />

77.t<br />

9l+.2<br />

70.o<br />

77.8<br />

85.4<br />

85.5<br />

8t+.9<br />

76.t+<br />

2059<br />

FAECES<br />

93.8<br />

94.L<br />

90.2<br />

92.5<br />

85.5<br />

88.6<br />

93.L<br />

88.9<br />

90.6<br />

86.5<br />

87.1<br />

97.9<br />

90.l+<br />

96.3<br />

93.5<br />

90.5<br />

93.1<br />

89.2<br />

78-84<br />

FAECES II,EUM FAECES<br />

86.9 gt+.t+ 86.6<br />

8? .5 gr+.t+ g5. g<br />

89.0 90.8 86.5<br />

à9.7 92.5 8?.8<br />

77 .9 8l+. I 76 .7<br />

8t+.5 9L.7 88.3<br />

90.9 93.L 89.2<br />

80.6 88.t 76.0<br />

85.tr 91.0 8L.¿<br />

'80.6 87,r+ ?7,9<br />

8r.6 87.1 78.7<br />

95 .3 97 .7 93.6<br />

78.8 90.0 ?4.5<br />

86.2 97.2 83.8<br />

85 .7 93 .L 8r+. r<br />

86.9 9L.9 86.5<br />

87.O<br />

78,6<br />

L8,{.2<br />

93.3<br />

88. 5<br />

84.0<br />

75.6<br />

2L67<br />

93.6<br />

93.tt<br />

89,4<br />

9L.5<br />

82.1<br />

90.7<br />

92.1+<br />

86.1<br />

89.7<br />

85.9<br />

8t+.6<br />

97.3<br />

89.1<br />

96.7<br />

d2. o<br />

90.6<br />

92.5<br />

88.6<br />

N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!