fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace
fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace
fn Partíal Fulfillnent - MSpace
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FACTOBS AFFECTING AMINO ACID<br />
AVAILABTT,I1TES FOR CEREAL GRATNS<br />
AND THETR COMPONENTS FOR GROITNG<br />
YTONOGASTRTC ANIMALS<br />
A THESIS<br />
PRESENTEÐ TO<br />
The I'aculty of Graduate Studies and Research<br />
Unlversity of Manitoba<br />
<strong>fn</strong> <strong>Partíal</strong> <strong>Fulfillnent</strong><br />
of the Requirements for the Degree<br />
Doctor of Philosophy<br />
by<br />
Wil1en Corne}Ís Sauer<br />
Department of Aninal Science<br />
IIay, L9Z6
'FACTORS AFFECTING AI'IINO ACID<br />
AVAILABILITIES FOR CEREAL GRAINS<br />
AND THEIR CO|VIPONENTS FOR GRO'{ING<br />
}4ONOGASTRIC ANTIIALS"<br />
by<br />
I^IILLEM CORNELIS SAUER<br />
A clisserkrtir¡n subrnitted to tho Faculty of Gradultr: Sturlics of<br />
thc [Jnivcrsity ol' M¿nitr¡b¿¡ in partial fullillmr:nt ol' tho rcr¡uirctncnts<br />
ol' lltt' dr,glcc ol'<br />
DO('TOR OF PHILOSOP}IY<br />
@, 19?6<br />
l'crnrission h¿rs l¡curt gl'ûr¡tcd to tho l.,lBlì^.RY Ol; 1'llli ttNlvUR-<br />
Sl1'Y OF M^Nl'l'OllA tt¡ lcrrrl or scll copies of this d¡s.$rt tioD. t()<br />
the NATIONAL LIBR^lìY Ol¡ (:ANAI)A to nticmfiln¡ this<br />
dissert¡tion and to lend or scl¡ copies of the f¡lnr, and UNIVËRslTY<br />
MICROFILMS to publish an abstri¡ct of tl¡is dissertation.<br />
The uuthor rescrves other publication rights, ¡¡nd ncithcr thc<br />
dissertation nor extensivc cxtracts l'runr it may be printed of olhrr-<br />
wise reproduccd without lhc author's writtcr¡ pcrn¡issi()n.
ÐEDTCATED TO T,IY DAUGHTER,<br />
MARGRTET VATENTTNA
TAB],8 OF CONTENTS<br />
page<br />
ABSTRACT. T<br />
ACKNOWIEÐGEI,ÍENTS... . TV<br />
],TST OF TABLES. V<br />
LTST OF FIGTIRES. . XT<br />
LIST OF APPENDTCES. XTT<br />
T,TST OF ABBREVTATTONS FOR A¡{INO ACTDS<br />
XVÏ<br />
INTRODUCTTOI{..... 1<br />
REVTEW OF THE LTTERATURE. 3<br />
Part 1. Cereal grain conposition and factors<br />
affecting anino acid avallabilities... ?<br />
Part 2. Protein metabolisn ín the large<br />
j.ntestine of monogastric aninals 18<br />
Part 3. Determination of amino acid availabilities<br />
by i1eal sampling fron cannulated<br />
aaimals, by ileal sanpling fron sac¡ificed<br />
aninals, by renoval of the caecum and by aid<br />
of germ-free and antibj.otic t¡reated aninals.....<br />
MAÎERTALS AND METHODS<br />
Study 1.....<br />
Study 2.<br />
Study 3<br />
Study l¡.<br />
Stu4y Za<br />
Study 2b.<br />
28<br />
34<br />
3lr<br />
40<br />
40<br />
49<br />
49<br />
56
RESIILTS.<br />
Study 4a.<br />
Study 4b.<br />
Analytical Procedures.<br />
Study 1.<br />
Study 2.<br />
Study 3<br />
Study 4.<br />
ÐrscussIoN.<br />
Study<br />
Studv 2a.<br />
Study 2b.<br />
Study 3a.<br />
Studv 3b.<br />
Study 4a.<br />
Study .t¡b.<br />
Page<br />
57<br />
ó1<br />
6L<br />
63<br />
ot<br />
7l+<br />
t+<br />
87<br />
89<br />
9r<br />
95<br />
98<br />
98<br />
r06<br />
110<br />
110<br />
tr0<br />
LL2<br />
LI7<br />
119<br />
l.22
SUIIIMARY.<br />
sTuDï 4.<br />
STUDY 3<br />
sruDr 1....:..<br />
8ÏBLTOGRAPIfT<br />
APPENDICES.<br />
L26<br />
L33<br />
L45<br />
r61<br />
180<br />
185<br />
L97<br />
205<br />
218
ABSTRACT<br />
The apparent ileal and faecal anino acid availabilities<br />
fron corn, wheat and barley v¡ere determined with barrows<br />
ranging Ín weight from 45 to 75 kE, that l¡ere fitted !úith<br />
ileocaeeal ¡e-entrant cannulae. The average ileal versus (vs)<br />
faecal avail-abilitles were 85.6 vs 89.9, 83.3 vs 89.1 and<br />
77.7 vs 85% for eorn, wheat and barley respectively. For the<br />
indispensable amino acids, ARG, HfS and TllR disappeared to the<br />
greatest e:(tent in the large íntestÍne (P(.05). For the dis-<br />
pensable anino acids, GIY and PRO disappeared to the largest<br />
extent in the large intest,ine (P
2t5/o brar!, 45fo shorts and LØ" middlings (B+S+M) were deternj.ned<br />
in pigs. The average ilea1 vs faecaL availabilities were pO.O<br />
vs 94.1, 85.4 vs 92.3 and 72.I '¡s 80.41Á tor flour, wheat and<br />
B+S+M respectively, Generally speaking, A.R,G, HfS THR, GLI and<br />
PRO dlsappeared to the largest extent in the large intestine.<br />
Of the ind.ispensable amino aeids, LTS and THR were<br />
equal 1n being least ayailable from flour and wheat. The i1eal<br />
LYS vs TIIR availabllities r¡ere 84.2 vs 85.4 and 79,5 vs 78.t+/"<br />
f¡on flour and r¡heat respectively. Lysine l¡as the least<br />
avallabLe amino acid hrhen deternlned by the faecaL analysis<br />
method, namely 86.1 and 86.O/" for flour and wheat respeetively.<br />
flea1 and faecal availabilities of THR in B+S+M ìrere lowest<br />
iuith values of 54.0 and 7l.3d/o respectlvely.<br />
The apparent ileal and faecal Êmino acj.d availabilities<br />
from finely ground and cracked wheat were dete¡nined with bar-<br />
rows that weighed approxínately 75 kg, The average ileal vs<br />
faecal availabilitles were 87.2 vs 91.6 and 82.8 vs 9O.è/" for<br />
finely ground and cracked wheat respectlveJ.y. The ileal<br />
availabilities of ¡nost amlno acids were significantly higher<br />
(P
irnprove the protein retention of barrows, rangj.ng in weight<br />
from 25 to l¡0 kg, that vrere fed diets lorrv Ín LTS.<br />
Metabolic Íleal and faecal anino acid leve1s were<br />
deterniaed w'ith barrows, ranging in weÍght fro¡r 45 to ?5 kg,<br />
that were fed 3 proteln-free dÍets containlng 5 , IO and IJ/"<br />
AlphafJ-oc respectively. As the level of Alphafloc was in-<br />
creased fron 5 to 10 and to L5/", the average ileal vs faecal<br />
anino acíd 1eve1s, expressed as grarns per I00 grams of dry<br />
natter intake, increased fron.0Z2 vs.032 to .091 vs .046<br />
and to .093 vs .050. The average ilea1 vs faecal nitrogen<br />
levels increased fro¡r .205 vs .101 to .256 vs .I39 and to<br />
.27I vs .161. The dlspensable anj_no acids mad.e up ?5 to gO/"<br />
of the total aeount of metabolic i1ea1 amino acids, of which<br />
PBO and GLY nade up 55 and 16S respectively. Arginine, TIÍR,<br />
GLT and PRO (especially the last Z anino acids) disappeared<br />
extensiveLy in the large i.ntestine. The levels of IÌ,E, LEU,<br />
LYS, MET and ASP increased between the end of the ileum and<br />
the anus of pigs fed the protein-free diets.<br />
IÏI
ACKNOIqLEDCEMENTS<br />
the author would like to thank Dr. S. C. Stothers<br />
for advice and help during the course of this work. <strong>fn</strong> particular,<br />
freedom of scienti-fic expression that was allowed<br />
and additional financial help receÍved are very nnuch<br />
appreciated.<br />
Many thanks are due to ll¡. J. Maltnan for giving<br />
voluntarily nuch of hfs own free time to assist during the<br />
pig collectíons, whfch were often caried out at very awkward<br />
tj-nes. <strong>fn</strong> addj.tion, his help with regard to various other<br />
aspects dealing with this thesís is appreciated.<br />
I wish to thank Dr. G. D. Phillips for Èhe surgery<br />
on ny pÍgs and for his interest and encouragement origínally<br />
during the start of these studies.<br />
The author is also very grateful to Ðr. N. E. Stanger<br />
and Ðr. M. Landeros for perfoming surgery'on the pÍgs during<br />
the last part of these studies.<br />
The wríter likes to thank l4r. J. Gano and<br />
¡[r. J. Baptist for their heJ.p, at times beyond thei¡ call of<br />
duty, during these studies. Acknowledgenent Ís also due to<br />
Mr. J. A. McKtrdy and IvIr. P. A. Mills for aÍd with technical<br />
analyses.<br />
FLnally, I would 11ke to thank ny wife, Christine,<br />
for her encouragement and patience. Financial- help from my<br />
parents and parents-1n-law is also appreciated.<br />
Winnipeg, I¡,ay 1976<br />
fV<br />
Itlillem Cornelis Sauer.
Table<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
4.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
8.<br />
o<br />
10.<br />
11.<br />
12.<br />
L3.<br />
LIST OF TABLES<br />
the llnfting an<strong>fn</strong>o acids for rats and<br />
pigs when cereal graÍn supply the<br />
only protein.....<br />
The anino acid composition of aleurone<br />
protein, gLutenin and prolamin from<br />
wheat end those of albunin, globuIin,<br />
glutenin and prolanin fro¡r barley.<br />
The anino acids levels (/") of wheat and<br />
wheat by-products end the distrLbution<br />
of anino acids in wheat by-products. . . . .<br />
True anino acid availabilLties fron corn,<br />
wheat and barley for growing pigs.......<br />
Percent nitrogen of wheat and barLey<br />
fractlons obtained at different tine<br />
lntervals of abrasion<br />
Fornulation of test dlets for study 1.....<br />
Formulatlon of diets for study 2..........<br />
Forroulation of test diets in study 3<br />
The experÍqental desígn and the daily<br />
intake of dry matter and orally and<br />
caecally supplfed nitrogen in study 3a..<br />
The experimental design and the daily<br />
intâke of dry natter and nitrogen and<br />
orally and caeeally supplled lysine in<br />
study 3b.<br />
Formulation of diets for study l+..........<br />
The anino acid and nitrogen content of<br />
high and lovr proteln wheat and their<br />
fractions.<br />
The ani.no acid and ni.trogen content of<br />
high and Low pnotein barley and<br />
theír fractions. .<br />
Page<br />
t_0<br />
1I<br />
L3<br />
36<br />
38<br />
41<br />
5I<br />
53<br />
54<br />
58<br />
64<br />
65
Table<br />
14.<br />
15.<br />
16.<br />
L7.<br />
18.<br />
19.<br />
20.<br />
2L.<br />
22.<br />
23.<br />
2J+.<br />
25.<br />
I!îeans ar¡d standard devÍation of dailv<br />
dry natter intake for the test and'<br />
proteln-free diets for study 1..........<br />
Means and standard error of the nean of<br />
the apparent availabilities of anino<br />
acids fron wheat and its fractions... i..<br />
Mea¡s and standard error of the nean of<br />
the apparent availabilities of amlno<br />
acids fron whole barley and endospern<br />
fron barley<br />
Means and standard error of the nean of<br />
apparent a¡nino acid availabilities of<br />
high and Low protein nheat and barley...<br />
The effect of dietary fiber level and<br />
weight of the rats on the ¡¡etabolic<br />
faecal a¡nino acid and nitrogen excretÍon<br />
Proximater lcid and neutral-detergeat fiber,<br />
starch and chrouic oxi.de analysãs for<br />
diets in study 2.<br />
Aulno aeid eomposition of diets for<br />
study 2.<br />
Conparisons of the Índ1vÍdual eieht-hour<br />
ileal collections fron wheat fõr study 2a<br />
Apparent il eal and faecal amíno acid<br />
availabilities<br />
of the cereal grains Ín<br />
study 2a.<br />
Conparison of i1eal dry natter dlgestibilities<br />
baEed on total dry natter èxcretion<br />
and chrorol c. oxide levels.<br />
Metabolic ileal and faecal anino acid<br />
levels fron study 2a.. . ..<br />
Apparent faecal amíno acid availabiLities<br />
of the cereal grains, 1n addit,ion to<br />
niÈrogen and dry natter digestibilit,ies<br />
for study 2b<br />
VÏ<br />
Page<br />
67<br />
69<br />
70<br />
72<br />
73<br />
75<br />
77<br />
?9<br />
80<br />
8,+<br />
86<br />
88
Table<br />
26.<br />
27.<br />
28.<br />
29.<br />
30.<br />
3L.<br />
32.<br />
33.<br />
34.<br />
35.<br />
36.<br />
37.<br />
38.<br />
Metabolic faecal anino acid and nitrogen<br />
Levels for study 2b....<br />
Anino acld and nitrogen conpositlon of<br />
Page<br />
test diets ln study 3,.... 92<br />
Individual daily nltrogen intakes and<br />
faecal and urinary logses and sone<br />
calculated parameters in study 3a....... 93<br />
The average amounts of nitrogen<br />
retained, nitrogen retentions and<br />
biological values for diets in study 3a. 9l+<br />
Individuat daily nitrogen intakes and<br />
faecal and urínary losses and sone<br />
calculated parenetel.s ln study 3b....... 96<br />
Average amounts of nltrogen retained,<br />
nitroge! retentions and biological<br />
values for dlets in study 3b.;.. 9?<br />
Proximate, ac j-d and neutral-detergent<br />
fiber and ehronic oxide analysei for<br />
diets of study d. 99<br />
Anino acld conposltion of diets fron<br />
study 4. 101<br />
Apparent ilea1 and faecal anino acid<br />
availabilities of whole wheat, f)-our<br />
and B+S+M and B+S+¡{-D for study 4....... lO2<br />
Metabolic i1eal and faecal amino acid<br />
level.s in study 4a...<br />
Partfcle size distribution of flnely ground<br />
and cracked wheat and of the ileai ãlgesta<br />
derived thereof<br />
Apparent iLeal aad faecal anino acid<br />
availabilities of ground and cracked<br />
wheat for study 4b<br />
Conparisons of apparent faecal anino acid<br />
avallabillties, nitrogen and dry nåtter<br />
digestibilities between caanulated and<br />
normal pigs fed corn, wheat and barley.. 111<br />
VÏT<br />
90<br />
105<br />
LO7<br />
109
lable<br />
39.<br />
40.<br />
l+1 .<br />
l+2.<br />
43.<br />
l+l+.<br />
45.<br />
l+6.<br />
47.<br />
48.<br />
Conparisons of the metabolic faecal anÍno<br />
âcid and nitroge n exeretion between<br />
study 2a and 2b.<br />
Apparent ileal and faecal atû1no acid<br />
availabíIíties, in addition to nitrogen,<br />
dry matter, starch and crude fiber<br />
digestlbÍlities and the dísappearance<br />
of these substances in tbe large<br />
Page<br />
r13<br />
intestine_. 115<br />
Conparison of apparent il-eal and faecal<br />
amino acid avaílabilities from corn<br />
and barley as obtained fron different<br />
laboratories. .... 1f8<br />
The disappearånce of amlno acids, nitrogen,<br />
dry natter, starch and crude fíber in the<br />
Iarge intestine.. J-zO<br />
?tre distributlon of partÍ.cIe slze of the<br />
cereal grai.n diets and of the i1eal<br />
digesta derived fron eaeh dlet.. L25<br />
Levels of anÍno acid, total nitrogen and<br />
dry natter in ileal digesta and faeces<br />
fron the cannulated plgs fed the<br />
maiatenance diets.<br />
Amino acÍd, total nitrogen and dry natter<br />
appearance (+) or disappearance- (-) in<br />
the large intestine in- þigs fed the<br />
protein-free diets<br />
r29<br />
t35<br />
Anino acid conposition of netabolic protein<br />
determined at different laboratoriès.... L37<br />
Apparent ílea1 anino acld availabilities fro¡r<br />
corn and the estinated true availabilities<br />
as calculated by the use of different type<br />
of corrections. L39<br />
Apparent ileal anino acid avallabilitj.es<br />
fron wheat and the estimated true<br />
avallabllities as calculated by the<br />
use of dlfferent t,ype of corrections.... 140<br />
VÏÏÏ
Table<br />
49.<br />
50.<br />
t1<br />
52.<br />
53.<br />
51+.<br />
55.<br />
56.<br />
Apparent ileal anino acid availabilÍt,ies<br />
fron barl.ey and the estimated true<br />
Page<br />
avaílabilitles as calculated by the<br />
use of dÍfferent type of correctlons.... f4l<br />
Estlnation of the dally endogeneous<br />
protein secretion into the lunen of the<br />
snall intestine of a 70 kg. man.. . It+?<br />
the apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />
availabilities from ground and cracked<br />
wheat in additlon to the digestÍbillties<br />
of amino acids in the large intestine<br />
and the differences in peicentage units<br />
between l1eal and faecal anino ãcid<br />
availabilities... 162<br />
Conparisons of ileaL and faecal amino<br />
acid availabílitles fron wheat fron<br />
studies 2a and 4 as affected by the<br />
type of pre-processlng...<br />
Apparent lleal and faecal- amlno acid<br />
availabilitles, Ín addition to nitrogen<br />
and dry matter-digestlbilities aad tñe<br />
disappearance of these substances Ín the<br />
large intestine.. L66<br />
Ihe recoverï of anino aci.ds from B+S+M and<br />
flor¡r (colunn A), in addition to the i1eal<br />
amino acid availabllltÍes fron B+S+M thet<br />
were. measured directly (column B) and those<br />
of BIS+M that were caiculated by difference<br />
from cracked wheat and flour ( colunn C) and<br />
fron finely sround wheat and flour<br />
(colunn D):.;.<br />
The apparent ileal a¡nino acid availabilities<br />
t69<br />
fron B+S+M-D and B+S+M, in addition to the<br />
esti.mated true availablllties from<br />
B+S+IU-D. L77<br />
the an<strong>fn</strong>o acid conposítion and crude fiber<br />
content of bran and endosperm fron<br />
study I and study 4a..., 18ó<br />
il(
Table<br />
57.<br />
58-<br />
59.<br />
Page<br />
Conparisons of apparent faecal anino acid<br />
availabilfties, in addition to nitrogen<br />
and dry matter digestibilíties, of wheat<br />
and barley fed to pigs and ratà.. . 188<br />
Conparisons of the apparent iLeal a¡ni.no<br />
acid avaílabillties, in addítion Èo<br />
aitrogen and dry matter digestibilitles<br />
of wheat aad barl.ey fed to pigs and<br />
the estinated ileaL value fór rats...... Lgl+<br />
ConparLson of faecaL amino acid<br />
availabillties fron bran and endospern<br />
fron wheat fed to pigs and rats....... 195
LTST OF FTGT'RES<br />
Figure Page<br />
1. Tlrpe and size of cannulae used..<br />
2. Experimental design and allowable<br />
dietary intake for study 2a.... l+7<br />
3. Exper<strong>fn</strong>ental design and allovrable<br />
daily dietary iatake for study tþ........ óO l<br />
XT
Appendix<br />
Table<br />
1.<br />
2.<br />
3.<br />
l+.<br />
5.<br />
6.<br />
8.<br />
LIST OF APPENDTCES<br />
Page<br />
Analysís of varianee between treatments<br />
for study 1: Mean squares for apparent<br />
altrogen and dry matter digestibiJ-itÍes. 2J.8<br />
Analysis of variance between treatments<br />
for study 1: Mean squares for netabollc<br />
faecal anino acfd and aitrogen losses... 2L9<br />
The individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />
ar0Íno acld availabllities frorn corn in<br />
study 2a, in additlon to nitrogen and<br />
dr? lratter digestibilities and average<br />
daily dry natter intake 22O<br />
Tbe individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />
â'¡ino acid availabl]lties f,ron barley Ín<br />
study 2a, in addition to n5.trogen and<br />
dr7 natter digest,ibilities and average<br />
daily dry natter intake. 22L<br />
lhe individual apparent ileal. and faecal<br />
anino acid availabillties fron wheat in<br />
study 2a, in addltion to nitrogen and<br />
dry natter digestibtlitÍes and average<br />
daily dry matter lntake.<br />
Mean squares of the analyses of variance for<br />
the apparent ileal and faecal availabillties<br />
of the essential amino acids for<br />
study 2a. . 223<br />
Mean squares for the enalysis of variance<br />
for the apparent Íleal and faecal<br />
avallabilities of the non-essentlal<br />
amino acids, 1n addítion to nitrogen<br />
and dry matter dlgestibilities for<br />
study 2a. 221+<br />
Mean squares of the analyses of vari,ance<br />
for the apparent ileal and faecal<br />
availabilities of I{ET and CYS for<br />
study 2a.......<br />
xrï<br />
. 225
Appendix<br />
Table<br />
9.<br />
t0.<br />
11.<br />
12.<br />
t3.<br />
14.<br />
L5.<br />
16.<br />
L7.<br />
18.<br />
The individual netabolic ileal anino acid<br />
and nitrogen levels, ín addition to dry<br />
netter digestlbilitles and daily dry<br />
matter lntake for pígs fed the<br />
maintenance dlets.<br />
The indtvldual netabolic faeeal a¡[ino acid<br />
and nitrogea leve1s, in additlon to dry<br />
natter dtgesttbilities for plgs fed the<br />
naintenance diets. .<br />
Mean squares of analyses of varÍance for<br />
the apparent anino acid availablllties,<br />
aitrogen and dry natter digestlbilltles<br />
for study 2b<br />
Page<br />
226<br />
227<br />
228<br />
The individual apparent faecal am:ino acid<br />
availabilities fron barley in study 2b,<br />
1¡ additíon to nitrogen and dry natter<br />
digestibilities,. 229<br />
The indivldual apparent faecal anino acid<br />
acid availabllities fron corn in study 2b,<br />
in addition to nitrogen and dry mattei<br />
digestibilttles.. 23O<br />
the indivldual apparent faecal anj.no acid<br />
avaÍlabilities froe wbeat in study 2b,<br />
1n addition to nitrogen and dry natter<br />
digestibilities.. i ¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ 23L<br />
lvtrean squares of the analyses of variance of<br />
the uetabollc faecal a¡nino acid and nitrogen<br />
excretion from study 2b. 232<br />
The individual netabolfc faecal amino acid<br />
e4d nitrogen excretlon fron pigs fed the<br />
?% aLphaîloc naintenance diet.l. 83<br />
The lndividual netabolic faecal anino acld<br />
an{ nitrogen excretion from pigs fed the<br />
14Ø alphailoc maintenance diãtl. BL<br />
Analyses of variance between treatnents for<br />
parameters neasured in study 3a...,.,... 235<br />
XTIÏ
Appendlx<br />
Table<br />
19.<br />
20,<br />
2L.<br />
22.<br />
23.<br />
24.<br />
25.<br />
Page<br />
The indÍvidual. apparent 1leal and faecal<br />
auino acid avaÍlabilitfes from whole<br />
wheat in study l¡a, Ín addition to<br />
nitrogen and dry natter digestibllities<br />
and average daily dry matter intake..... 236<br />
The lndivldual apparent ilea1 and faecal<br />
anino acld availabilltles from flour ia<br />
study l¡a, in addition to nitrogen and<br />
dry natter digesttbiU-tles and average<br />
daily dry matter intake<br />
237<br />
The lndividual apparent ileal and faecal<br />
anino aci.d availabilities f,ro¡¡ the<br />
B+S+M diet in study lt, in addition to<br />
nitrogen and dry nâtter digestibilities<br />
and average dalJ.y dry natter intake..... 238<br />
The lndividual apparent ÍIeal and faecal<br />
amlao acid availabilÍties fron diet<br />
B+S+M-D fron study l¡a, in addition to<br />
nitrogen and dry matter digestibilities<br />
and average daily dry mattèr intake..... 239<br />
the individual netabolic ileal and faecaÌ<br />
anino aÍcd, nitrogen and dry nåtter<br />
levels fron plgs fed the 5f" al-phafloc<br />
protein-free d1ets, in addft,ion to<br />
average dally dry natter intake 24O<br />
The lndividual ¡¡etabolic ilea1 and faecal<br />
anino aeid, nitrogen _and dry matter levels<br />
from plgs fed the 10fi atphafloc protein-free<br />
dfet, 1n addition to average daily dry<br />
natter intake Z4L<br />
The lndividual netabolic ilea1 and faecal<br />
anino ac5.d, nitrogen and dry matter<br />
levels fron plgs fed the L5/o aLphaf1oc<br />
protein-free diets, in addítion to<br />
average dalIy dry roatter intake 242<br />
ïïv
Appendlx<br />
lable<br />
26.<br />
27.<br />
28.<br />
Anal-yses of variance: Mean Equares for<br />
apperent ileal and faecal enino acid<br />
availabilities, nítrogen and dry matter<br />
diEestibllitles digestibllitles fron from finelv finely sround ground<br />
and cracked wheat for study l+b....<br />
Page<br />
2l+3<br />
The tndividual apparent ileal and faecal<br />
anino acid availabllities of ground<br />
wheat from study l¡b, in addition to<br />
nitrogen and dry matter digest,ibilities<br />
and average daily dry natter intake..... 241+<br />
The individual apparent ileal and faecal<br />
amino acld availabilities of cracked<br />
!úheat from study db, in addltion to<br />
nitrogen and dry natter digestibilities<br />
and everage dally dry natter intake 2l+5
AIA<br />
ARG<br />
ASP<br />
cYs<br />
GLU<br />
GLT<br />
r{rs<br />
II,E<br />
tEu<br />
LYS<br />
¡[ET<br />
PI{E<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TTIR<br />
TRT<br />
TTR<br />
VAL<br />
LTST<br />
FOR<br />
OF ABBREVTATTONS<br />
THE AMINO .{CIDS<br />
Alanine<br />
Arginine<br />
Aspartic acid<br />
Cystine<br />
Glutanic acid<br />
Glycine<br />
HistÍdine<br />
l- SOl.eUC r-ne<br />
teuc ine<br />
Lysine<br />
Methionine<br />
Phenylalanine<br />
froJ-l.ne<br />
Serine<br />
Threoníne<br />
Tryptophan<br />
lyrosine<br />
Valine
I}iTRODUCTION<br />
The nutritive value of a proteÍn is not only<br />
determined by.its amino acld composition but also by the<br />
avaÍlability of the individual amino aclds of the protein to<br />
the nonogastric animal . For more accurate and econor.rícal<br />
fornul-ation of dietary amino aci.d levels in relatj-on to<br />
requirements, available instead of total aroi.no acid 1eve1s<br />
from specific protein sources and from energy feeds that<br />
also supply protein, should be taken into account.<br />
The term availability has been defined by<br />
de Lhelenaere et a1 . (L967) as that portion of amino acids<br />
present in a protein whích is used for grovrth, development and<br />
maintenance of an ani.mal insofa¡: as it is dependent on the<br />
digestlbility of the protein, the presence of enzyrae inhibítors<br />
and enzyme-res i stånt peptide linkages, and rate of release of<br />
amino acids in the intestLnal tract. Amino acid availability<br />
defined as such may be determined according to the faecal ana-<br />
l1,sis method, which neasures the a¡rounts of ingested anrino<br />
acids excreted in the faeces.<br />
The faecal analysÍs method was developed by Kuiken<br />
and Lyman in 1948 and hâs since gained general acceptance in<br />
nutritional research. However, ín recent years, this method has<br />
been often criticized because of possible microbÍal alterations<br />
of undigested and unabsorbed nitrogeneous residues in the large<br />
intestine<br />
I
äolnes et el . ¡7,o7L) Ceteririned the ileal anci<br />
faecal emino acid availabilit ies fro¡:r specific protein sources,<br />
nanel¡i so¡rbean neal and rapeseeC neal using grov;ing pigs fi-tted<br />
'¡¡ith re-entrant cannulae placed at the enC of the i.leu¡n.<br />
Apart fron specific prctein sources, ce:'eal- grains<br />
suppl¡,r a lar.:e prooortion of the total Cietery protein in<br />
oractical diets for swine end poultr"'. In adiition, cereal<br />
grains are the n:a,'or source of protei-n for the hunan population<br />
in manlr developing countríes. Data rega:.ding faecel<br />
anino acid availabilities fron cereel grains can be found in<br />
the literature. Iìowever, =ssentially no inforr.lation on ileal<br />
availabilities, which na¡r be nore accurâte indlces, is<br />
av: ilable .<br />
The nain objective of the studies that 'rere carried<br />
out was to determine to vJhât extent ileal and faecal anino<br />
acid availabilities fron cereel greins differed. ft was also<br />
atten:pted to deternine which phl'sical and,/ or che¡:ical fractions<br />
\dere responsibl-e for the discrepêncy between total and<br />
availabl-e enino :cid content fron th.e c:real Ê::eins. Th=<br />
latter knovrledge Ì:ta' be o-f inportance to plant breeders in.<br />
their cuest for inproving the prctein oualit1' of cereel grains.<br />
The pig was chosen as experir::ntel åninal . First<br />
of all , this eninal can be fítted with re-entrant cannul-ae.<br />
SeconCll', it is generall-¡ felt that infornation obteineC frcn<br />
the pig is acplicabl3 to acst other nonogestric sp-^cies.<br />
¿
REI/Ï:],1I OF lHE LITEF.A.TURJ<br />
The quelít.v of cereal protein ls pcor beceuse cf the<br />
1ow content of son:e amino acids that are essentiel for grcvrth<br />
anci other forns of production. The liniting aminc acids cf the<br />
na;or cereal grains fed to pigs and rats are shown j.n Teble I.<br />
References were selected in which bcth the first and secondlin:iting<br />
(and sometimes thirci- l imit ì-ng anino aciis) were<br />
deter¡nineci. L¡rsine and THR were fcund to be the first and<br />
se c cnd -lir:it ing eminc aciCs respectivell/ fcr barlelr, o¿ts,<br />
rice, rye, tritJ-cele and. wheet. Tryptophen end LYS were fcunC<br />
to be the first and seccnd-limitlng anino acids respectivelir<br />
for corn fed to growing cr fínishing pigs (Eaker et al.,I9(9;<br />
Cello and Fond, 1968). The order of limiteticn cf these anino<br />
acid.s v,'a s reversed when ccrn was fed tc t'abi' pigs (Ga^llo et al. ,<br />
L97L). Ðue to dif.ferent anino acid reouirements for srcwth and<br />
naintenence (liclaughlan, 1972 ) . fectors such as the leve1 cf<br />
protein tested and the ege of the enirnal mal¡ deternine r,rhich<br />
¿nino acid of 2 nearll. ecuall;, liniting amino aciis will be the<br />
nost linitíng. îhe sulfur containing aninc ecids heve been<br />
shovrn to be ihird-limiting fcr corn, oats, anci tritical-e<br />
(te¡re t ) .<br />
L¡rsine, 1n addition to being usuelllr the ncst iirniting<br />
:,nino acid for pigs end rets, was alsc found tc be the least
1'ABLE 1.<br />
ITEI,TS<br />
CEREAL GRAÌN<br />
Barl e y<br />
Corn<br />
Oat s<br />
Rice<br />
Rye<br />
Triticalo<br />
Vlheat<br />
Rye<br />
The limiting amíno acids for<br />
only protein.<br />
Fírst-Limiting<br />
Arnino Acid<br />
LYS.<br />
TRY.<br />
TRY.<br />
T I¡C<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
LYS.<br />
Se c ond- Linriting<br />
Arnino Ac id<br />
THR.<br />
tYs.<br />
r-¡Iù.<br />
TRY.<br />
TRY.<br />
TRY.<br />
THR.<br />
T}IR.<br />
THR.<br />
THR.<br />
rats and pigs when cereal grain supply the<br />
Third-Limiting<br />
Amino Acid<br />
Ir.iET. ( cTS )<br />
IrnT. (cYs),TitR.,<br />
tLE., VAL.<br />
l,Í¡:1'. (cYS )<br />
THR. i'1.8?. (CYS)<br />
THR.<br />
THR.<br />
THR.<br />
Species<br />
raüs<br />
pigs<br />
pigs<br />
pigs<br />
rats<br />
rat s<br />
rat s<br />
rats<br />
rat s<br />
rat s<br />
pigs<br />
rat s<br />
rets<br />
Refe renc e s<br />
Howe et aI ., 1965.<br />
Baker e! aI ., Lg6gi<br />
Gallo and Pond, 1!ó8;<br />
Uesl"emer eù al . ,<br />
t970.<br />
Gallo g! aI ., 1968.<br />
Pond g! al ., 1971.<br />
RosenberE et aI ..<br />
r9ó0.<br />
Tang g! ÊÀ., 1958.<br />
Hovle gt aI . , 1965.<br />
Rosenbele et aI ..<br />
L959.<br />
Howe g! aL., 1965;<br />
I(ihlber¡- and !ìrl c son ,<br />
l96d; Iv,cLaughlan<br />
et al . , 1967.<br />
Shurnada and Cl-ine,<br />
L97t+.<br />
Shurnada and Cì-ine,<br />
L97 t+.<br />
I{owe et al .. 19ó5:<br />
l,rcl,auãñ'tãn- ét ár. l<br />
1P6l; Rosen6ãr[et<br />
al ., 1960.<br />
Howe et aI., 1965;<br />
Kihlberg and Eri c son,<br />
I96t+.<br />
+-
avâilable indi-spensable a¡ij-no acid frorn cereal grains when<br />
deterrained by the faecal anell¡sis rirethod (Eggun, 1973; Olsen<br />
et al. , 1968; Poppe and l.ieier, 1971; Sauer et el. , I97t+). The<br />
availabilities of TIIR and IIT were also found to be relativell'<br />
low in comparison to the availabilities of the other anino acids<br />
of cereal grains.<br />
Iiowever, the validitl¡ of the faecal anal¡,'sis nethod rna¡r<br />
be ouestioned on grounds of the more or les.s unknown effects cf<br />
the nicroflora of the large intestine on protein n:etabolisrn and<br />
this aspect will be díscussed in Part 2 of this I iterature<br />
revieur. Part 3 witl deal with âlternate rnethods for daternining<br />
anino aci.d availabilities. Factors in cereal graj-ns, and also<br />
of other protein sources that ma1' affect the availabil_ities<br />
of anino acids to the nonogastric animal will be discussed in<br />
Part 1 of this literature review.<br />
. True amino aciC availabilities are derived fron their.<br />
apparent availebilities by correcting the latter estinates for<br />
the netabolic faecal amino acid excreti-on. The metabolic faecal<br />
anino acid excretion is usuall1' deterrnined fron: faeces of<br />
aninals fed protein-free diets. Factors affectíng the netabolic<br />
faecal amino acid excretion have been extensivel¡r reviened pre-<br />
viouslr¡ (Sauer, 1972\ and, are sur¿r,¡arized as follolvs : I ) End.o-<br />
Éienous protein derived fron undigested resiCues .fro¡r sloughed-off<br />
cells r:ake up a nuch larger proportion of netebolic faecal<br />
protein than protein derived frora undigested digestirre<br />
secretions; 2) The level of sloughed.-off cells is nainl¡r<br />
E
deternined by the emount of undiEestible dr¡r malter in the diet<br />
Ït '¡ou1ci seerÌ to be ad¡¡isable to fcrnulete e protein-free diet<br />
ín such a rìenner that it contains the same âmount of und.igestible<br />
Cr¡r natter as the diet for whi ch one deterreines the true<br />
ânino aciC ar¡ailabilities. The latter nay be achieveci b;; including<br />
¿ certain emount of fiber in the protein-fr:e d j-ets.<br />
The test aninrals shculd elso be paír-feC the test and. protein-<br />
free diet in orCer to guerantee eoual inteke of undigestJ_ble<br />
dry matter; l) ?he Level a nd. type of protein is not thought<br />
to affect the r¿etebolic faecal arnino acid excretion. Factors<br />
affecting the ¡retabolic faecal amino acid excretion rvitl not<br />
be discussed in this review of literatu.re alihcugh the-r., ere<br />
f:'eouently referred to in the discussion part of this thesis.<br />
6
PART I.<br />
Cereal grain composition and factors<br />
affecting amino acíd availabilities.<br />
Ce¡eal protein can be separated into four major<br />
protein types b]¡ successj.ve solvent extractions on grOund<br />
rnaterial: 1) water, albumin; 2) salt solutions, globulin;<br />
3) 7O/' ethanol, prolamin; and 4) dilute alkali (oracid),<br />
glutelin. The nutritive value of cereal protein is<br />
primarily deternined by the amount of prolamin. Prolar¿in<br />
contains only small amounts of f,YS. Prolamin makes up<br />
approximately 50-55, 4O-5O, 35-45 and LO-I5/" of the total<br />
protein from corn, wheat, barley and oats respectively<br />
(Neurath and Bailey, L954J. the protein efficiency ratio<br />
of cereal protein in diets fed to rats hras 2.1 for oats<br />
(which has the Lovrest content of prolamin) and ranged. from<br />
I.4 to 1.7 for the other cereals (Jones et gL., 1948).<br />
Prola¡nin and glutelin constitute the protein from<br />
the endo sperü (inner) part of the seed. The albumin and<br />
globulin fractions are found primarily on the outer part of<br />
the kernel . iriore specifically, these are<br />
found in tire<br />
aleurone cell layer whose cells have a thick fibrous cell<br />
wal1 .<br />
The total protein content of a cereal grain wl1l<br />
largely be deternined by the climatic conditions under whÍch
it is grown. ït is fur*,her dependent on the particular<br />
variety of cereal grai-n and oû other facto:.s such as, the<br />
level of fertilizer application. u-nfavourable climatic<br />
conditions, such as, inadequate mo j-sture usually resul-t in<br />
a decrease in the -r,otal amount of enciosperm protej.n.<br />
Favourable conditions result in an increase of endosperut<br />
protein. Regardless of cli¡:atic conditions, the total<br />
amount of protein derived fror¿ albumin and globulin re-<br />
mains relatlveJ.l, s6n5¡æ¡. Consequently, protein fronr<br />
albunin and gLobulin contributes relatively more protein<br />
to the total amount of protein from cereal grains when these<br />
are grown unrier unfavourable rather than favourable<br />
clinati.c conditions. Protein cierived from albumin and<br />
globulin generally rnakes up a larger percentage of the<br />
totaL protein of a low protein cereal variety than of a high<br />
protein ceÈ'ea1 variety when grown under slmilar c.lir:atic<br />
conditions (Draper, 1973; Sodek ancÌ lnÍlson, 797L). Fertilization<br />
increases nostly the endospern proteins, resulting in a<br />
relative decrease in the proportions of albumin and globulin<br />
(Abrot eù al . , L97O)<br />
There ar.e considerable differences between the amino<br />
acid composition of the cei.eal protein fractions. in general,<br />
the a¡nino acid composition of a fraction in different species<br />
of cereal grai-ns tends to be similar. Therefore, the ariino<br />
acid content of a cereaL grain wilÌ largely be determined by
the proportion of each protein fraction i.t contains. The amino<br />
acid composition of the protein fractions from uheat and barley<br />
are shown in Table 2. The composibion of al"eurone protein from<br />
wheat r¡¡ould be indÍcative of the combined composition of albunin<br />
and globulin. Albunrin and globulin protein from both wheat and<br />
barley contai.n much higher levels of lhe basic amino acids (ARG.,<br />
HIS. and LTS.), ALA. and ASP. and nuch lower proporti.ons of GLU.<br />
and PRO. than prolamj.n and glutenin. 0f the endospern proteins,<br />
glutenin contained considerably more LYS. than prolanin especially<br />
wí.th regard to barley. Hiproly barley (high LIS. barley) contains<br />
relatively more glutenin than prolamin compared to other barley<br />
varieties.<br />
The irain differences in arnino acid conposition of the<br />
di.fferent proteín fractions from wheat and barley can also be<br />
detected in the protein fractions of corn (Sodek and lfilson,<br />
I97L). Robbins et al . (19?1 ) postulate simiLar differences between<br />
the proteia fractj.ons fron oats.<br />
The disproportionate contribution of amino acids by the<br />
different protein fractions is also shown by recalculated data<br />
from Horn et al. (1958). They deternined the composition of a¡¡ri_no<br />
acids in wheat products. Hard red winter wheab was experimentall¡,<br />
nitled. Straight grade flour of ?I.5/o extractíon, 16.)/" bran and<br />
7.9% short s was produced. îÌre data wee recalculated in order to<br />
obtain some idea about the quantitative distribution of ar¿ino<br />
acids in the wheat products (Table 3). Nitrogen from bran and<br />
shorts made up about 3O/o of the total nitrogen from wheat but 45Zo<br />
9
TABLE 2.<br />
CEREAL GRAÏN<br />
FRACTTONS<br />
AMTNO ACTDS<br />
Essentiel<br />
ARG.<br />
Hrs.<br />
rLE.<br />
LEU.<br />
LYS.<br />
¡,{ET.<br />
PHE.<br />
THR.<br />
VAL.<br />
Non-Ðs sentia I<br />
AtA.<br />
^eD<br />
GLU.<br />
CLY.<br />
., PRO.<br />
SER.<br />
TYR.<br />
I 2<br />
)<br />
It<br />
The amino acid compoaitlon of aleurone . protein, glutenin and prolamin<br />
from wheat and those of albumin, globulin, glutenin and prolamin from barley.<br />
1<br />
ALEURONE<br />
7.3<br />
3.6<br />
2.8<br />
5.5<br />
4.1<br />
L.2<br />
3.8<br />
2.9<br />
h.9<br />
l+.7<br />
7.3<br />
r5. o<br />
3"6<br />
4.1<br />
2.7<br />
tl,]HEAl<br />
2<br />
GLUTENTN<br />
4.I<br />
2.3<br />
3.7<br />
6.6<br />
2.3<br />
t.6<br />
4.8<br />
3.r<br />
l+ .2<br />
2.8<br />
3,7<br />
33.2<br />
3.8<br />
10.3<br />
5.U<br />
J.o<br />
2<br />
PROLA}{ÏN<br />
2.7<br />
2.2<br />
4.3<br />
6.9<br />
0.6<br />
1.4<br />
5.5<br />
2,2<br />
4.1<br />
2.o<br />
2.9<br />
)8.9<br />
1.5<br />
13 .8<br />
4.7<br />
2.6<br />
Stevens et eJ. , &963)<br />
Ewart (rØ7f<br />
Folkes anl TeÍûû (f956)<br />
Expressed as grams per 16 grams of nitrogen.<br />
3<br />
ALBUIviÏN<br />
13 .0<br />
4.3<br />
4.1<br />
5.8<br />
no<br />
1.4<br />
3.0<br />
3.1+<br />
5.ri<br />
ii.0<br />
8.7<br />
6.7<br />
4.2<br />
4.1<br />
2.7<br />
3<br />
GLOtsUTÏN<br />
22.o<br />
3.L<br />
2.2<br />
4.r<br />
6.3<br />
0.9<br />
¿.L<br />
2.4<br />
4.I<br />
o.7<br />
5,6<br />
6.8<br />
10.7<br />
.) al<br />
3.9<br />
I.5<br />
BARLEY<br />
GLUTENÏN<br />
L2.O<br />
u.3<br />
3.5<br />
l+.9<br />
4.8<br />
1.1<br />
2.7<br />
3.r<br />
t+.9<br />
6.6<br />
4,7<br />
11 .6<br />
5.2<br />
6.6<br />
4.2<br />
1.9<br />
PROI,AMTN<br />
6.(,<br />
¿.¿<br />
3.('<br />
3.5<br />
0.8<br />
0.8<br />
3.6<br />
I.9<br />
3.5<br />
2.2<br />
I.2<br />
23.o<br />
L.7<br />
L5.3<br />
3.2<br />
1.ó<br />
ts O
TABrE 3.<br />
CEREAL CO]'TPONENTS<br />
AM]NO ACTIS<br />
Es sential<br />
ARG.<br />
HIS.<br />
rLE.<br />
LEU.<br />
lYs.<br />
[{ET.<br />
PHE.<br />
THR.<br />
VA],.<br />
Semi- Es s ¡nt ---ES:-- iaI<br />
TYR.<br />
NTTROCEN<br />
DRY IIATTER<br />
The amino acld levels (,arl of<br />
distribution of aníno acids<br />
WHOLE<br />
IIIHEAT<br />
o.63<br />
o.3z<br />
o,62<br />
0.90<br />
0.38<br />
0.20<br />
o.7r<br />
O.lþ3<br />
0.59<br />
o.33<br />
o.36<br />
r .11<br />
0.44<br />
o.6t+<br />
o.95<br />
0.64<br />
0.21<br />
o.72<br />
o.55<br />
o.73<br />
o.2g<br />
o.37<br />
2.r9 2.57<br />
100.0 100.0<br />
0.19<br />
0.07<br />
0.l-1<br />
0. 16<br />
0.11<br />
0. 0lr<br />
0.12<br />
0.09<br />
0-12<br />
wheat and wheat by-products and the<br />
in wheat by-producùs .<br />
r.23<br />
o.l+5<br />
o.?5<br />
1.06<br />
o.77<br />
o.24<br />
o,78<br />
o,63<br />
0.83<br />
0.05 0.38<br />
0.06 o.Lt+<br />
o.43 2.82<br />
l.6,9 r_00.0<br />
0. r0<br />
0 .0t+<br />
0.06<br />
0.08<br />
0.06<br />
0.02<br />
0.06<br />
0.05<br />
o.o7<br />
0.03<br />
0.03<br />
0. 5r<br />
o.27<br />
o.59<br />
0.84<br />
0.28<br />
0.18<br />
0.68<br />
o.3?<br />
0. 51<br />
0.30<br />
o.3z<br />
o.36<br />
0.19<br />
o.42<br />
0.60<br />
0.20<br />
0.13<br />
0.49<br />
0.27<br />
0.38<br />
0.2L<br />
o.?3<br />
I.4l+<br />
7r.5<br />
Colunm A, B and C indicate the contribution of amino acids (grams) from bran, shorts<br />
and flour respectively to whole wheat (100 grams ).<br />
Colurnn Ð shows the percentage of amino acíds in whole wheat that are contained in<br />
bran and shorts.<br />
o.22<br />
2.o2<br />
r00.0<br />
2<br />
Ð<br />
t+6. o<br />
3l+,lr<br />
27 .l+<br />
26.7<br />
4t+.7<br />
30.0<br />
25.4<br />
32.6<br />
32.2<br />
24,2<br />
25,O<br />
29.7<br />
24.8<br />
F<br />
ts
of the total LYS and ARG r^res presen! in these fractions<br />
(Teble l; Colwnn D). the relativel-v- hígh Levels of j,YS and<br />
ARG in bran and shorts reflected the high concentrati-on of<br />
aleurone protein in bran ånd shorts, since nos.a, if not al1<br />
aleurone protein is found in these frsctions (Hinton et al..<br />
l-Çll; Shetler et å1. , L9l+7).<br />
Protein in aleurone celIs (albumin and giobulin) may<br />
be of linrited di-gestibilit¡r sínce the thick cellulosic cell wall<br />
of these cells is thought to interfere with digestion of the<br />
protein that is conta<strong>fn</strong>ed in these cel1s. A certain anount of<br />
this protein may also be tíghtly bound Lo the cellulosic nratrix<br />
of the aleì,rrone ce1ls (Saunders and Kohler, I9?Z). Saunders<br />
et aI. (f969) fed bran from hard red spring wheat to chicks.<br />
the contents of the lov¡er intesti_ne contained intact ce1ls<br />
from the aleurone layer. ÐÍgestion of bran consists essentially<br />
of the breakdown and absorption of the contents fron the<br />
aleurone cells which occurs only when the cetl wa11s are<br />
ruptured. The nunber of intact aleurone cells remaining in<br />
the lower intestine and in the faeces seemed. to be affected by the<br />
variety of wheat from which bran was d.erived and by the physical<br />
form in whi.ch bran was fed. Pel1eted feed resulted in a larger<br />
number of ruptured. aleurone ce1ls than mash based on mj-croscopi.c<br />
examinatÍon of intestinal contents and faeces.<br />
The true amino acid availabilities from corn, wheat<br />
and barley fed io gror¡ing pigs are shown in Table 4. <strong>fn</strong> general ,<br />
L2
TABLE 4.<br />
A,rrNo AcrDs (ø)<br />
Es se nti al -]m:-<br />
HÏS.<br />
ÏLE.<br />
]-,8U.<br />
I t¡c<br />
MET.<br />
DIJ!:T<br />
THR.<br />
VAL.<br />
Non--{s s e ntial<br />
ALA.<br />
ASP.<br />
GLU.<br />
CLY.<br />
PRO.<br />
SER.<br />
TYR.<br />
NTTN,OG}IN<br />
I 2<br />
True amino acid availabÍl1ties<br />
for growing pigs.<br />
93.7<br />
94.7<br />
92.O<br />
94.?<br />
90.5<br />
92.9<br />
92.1+<br />
94.5<br />
92.5<br />
9r.7<br />
9L.5<br />
95.3<br />
BB.2<br />
95.5<br />
93.L<br />
93.O<br />
llaster (L972)<br />
Eeeum (1973 )<br />
Sauer gr 9., (1924)<br />
CORN<br />
95.2<br />
93.5<br />
88.5<br />
92.8<br />
89.3<br />
93.6<br />
92,2<br />
89.8<br />
89.8<br />
93.O<br />
91 .1<br />
92.2<br />
89.6<br />
96.8<br />
93.O<br />
90.2<br />
95.O<br />
95.9<br />
90.3<br />
93.2<br />
84. r<br />
88.6<br />
92,o<br />
88.4<br />
90.8<br />
86.5<br />
87 .1<br />
97.1+<br />
89.7<br />
-t- _<br />
90.5<br />
or Ã<br />
91.8<br />
from corn, wheaù and barley<br />
9t+.7<br />
9t+.7<br />
89.2<br />
9r.2<br />
80.8<br />
89.8<br />
92.1+<br />
87 .3<br />
89.0<br />
8¿. r<br />
8t+.6<br />
97 ,o<br />
BB .3<br />
96.3<br />
92.8<br />
90 .3<br />
90.9<br />
88.9<br />
87 .6<br />
79.2<br />
84.l<br />
72.3<br />
80.7<br />
77.8<br />
82.5<br />
75.5<br />
77 .8<br />
90.4<br />
79.1<br />
88.1<br />
B3 .8<br />
8?.4<br />
BARLEY<br />
9L::4<br />
93.2<br />
8t+.7<br />
88 .7<br />
77.t<br />
87 .3<br />
90.1<br />
85.5<br />
87 .6<br />
80.6<br />
85.4<br />
93,3<br />
84. 3<br />
93,2<br />
89.9<br />
87 .6<br />
85 .8<br />
H
the avail-abilities decrease from corn to wheat and to barley<br />
and is inversely related. to the increase in the proportions of<br />
albunin and globulin from corn to flheat to barley. Protein<br />
from al-bumin and globulin rnakes up approxirn ately 5-6; 9-L5<br />
and 13 -24,4" of the total protein of corn, wheat and barle¡r<br />
respectively (Neurath and Eailey, I95t+). Postel (1957) sue-<br />
gested that since barley has a nulticellular aleurone layer, it<br />
should be higher in aleurone protein as a percentage of total<br />
protein compared wit,h wheat, which has a síng1e al_eurone layer.<br />
SeveraL workers suggested the relatively high concentration of<br />
LïS in aleurone protein to be responsible for its tov; availability<br />
from cereal grains (Eggu¡r, lpll; Iiunck, L96h; Sauer et ù.., I97b).<br />
The above hypothesis explains also the 1ow availabilities of<br />
ASP and Al,A and the high availabilities of GLU and PRO. i{owever,<br />
the high availabilities of ARG and TtfS and the relatively low<br />
availability of THR can not be explained in the sanre menner<br />
(Tables2 and 4).<br />
Other factors may affect protein digestibility and.<br />
therefore amino acid availability from cereal grains. Trypsin<br />
plays an important role j-n the digestion of protein. The extent<br />
of digestion by trypsin can be influenced by the amino acid<br />
sequence near the catalytic site. lrypsin exhibits a strict<br />
specificity for arginyì and 1ysyl peptide bond.s. The nu¡:ber of<br />
peptide bond.s split by trypsin wj-ll be dependent on the total<br />
anount of .A,RG and l,YS present in the protein (lÌilhalyi, L}TZ).<br />
r4
Lysylprolyl and arginyl pro1y1 línkages are completely resistant<br />
to tr.vpsin (EeIl, L954). Thus, a high PRO content coupled. with<br />
a low ARG and l,TS content might result j.n a less efficient<br />
digestion of a particular protein. This hypothesis would favor<br />
a relatj.vely high level of digestion of aleurone protein (if it,<br />
would be released from the aleurone ce1ls ) and a relatively 1ow<br />
leve1 of digestion of glutelin and prolanin. The rat io of PRO<br />
to ARG and LTS is parti-cularly high in prolamin (Table 2).<br />
The nunber of peptide bonds split by chymotrypsin<br />
would be dependent on the -r,otal amount of LEU and the aromatic<br />
anino acids , namely PHE and TfR.<br />
Protein digestion would also depend on the distribution<br />
of amino acid residues which are compatible with enzyme specificity..<br />
Plant proteins are highly organized folded conxpact structures.<br />
The relative distribution of the ttkeytr amino acid.s (ARG, LyS,<br />
L,EU, PHE and TIR) from the inner to outer part of a protein<br />
molecule may influence its effi"ciency of digestion by trypsin<br />
and ghymotrypsin.<br />
Heating pure proteins gives rise to the fornation of<br />
cross-tinkages between the E-amino group of LTS and the carboxyl<br />
groups of the dicarboxylic amino acids or their amides<br />
(B¡arnason and Carpenter, 1970). These conpounds are not<br />
absorbed (va[e-ni6stra and. Ëarnes, lr97O). The possibilit,y of<br />
such linkages occuring naturally in eereal protein should not<br />
be overlooked. Such a cross-link has been isolated from hair<br />
(ilarding and Rogers, L97I).<br />
L5
Of the cereal grains, barley and especially<br />
sorghun contain significanb amounts of tannins (thang<br />
and Fuller, 19ó4; Eserun, 1968). the true nitrogen<br />
digestibilities of 2Ç sources of barley, ranging in tannin<br />
content from 0.55 to 1.23f" ïere nieasured on rats (Eggu¡n<br />
and Christeasen, 1975). The tannin content was r,reasured<br />
accordíng to AOAC (1965) procedures. The nitrogen content<br />
of the 29 barley samples varied frorn 1.55 Lo 3.221ø. Therefore,<br />
the relationship betwêen nitrogen digestibility and<br />
content of nitrogen (which also affects nitrogen dige stibili-uy )<br />
aná tannin was determined by use of a mulliple regression<br />
equation, which was as follows: lÐ1 = 82.60 + 3.Sg<br />
x N (Ø) - 6.27 x tannin (íá) (Eeeun and Christensen,<br />
1975). For exaraple, barley containing 2.f nitrogen and, O.55,ii<br />
tannin and barlel/ containing 2/. nlLrogen and, 1.23% tannin<br />
will result in true nitrogen digestibilities of 86.9 and<br />
ð¿. ^^ ^.4 /)o respecllvely.<br />
. tr''Ihe at and rye, and to a lesser extent rice, oats<br />
and corn were found. to contain a trypsin inhibitor (iaporte<br />
-<br />
and Tremolieres, 1!62). The anti-trypsin factor seems to<br />
1TÐ,<br />
of nitrogen in<br />
bàr1ey.<br />
true nitrogen<br />
barley; tannin ciigestibility; N (ií): percentage<br />
lit): percentage of tannin in<br />
I6
e concentrated in the germ part of the cereal grains<br />
(l'loran et al ., f968).<br />
ïn conclusion, differences in anino acid<br />
composition between cereal grains can be partly attributed<br />
to the different amor¡nts of the l¡ rnajor protein fractions.<br />
The amount of aleurone protein contained within each<br />
cereaL grain is dependent on the clinatic conditions<br />
under which it is grown, the variety and other factors<br />
such as the level and type of fertilizer applicati.on. The<br />
amount of aleurone protein could be an inportant factor<br />
in determining anrino acid availabilities. The type of<br />
physicaÌ processing before feeding in turn would affect<br />
the availability of aleurone protein for digestion.<br />
Other limiting factors in the utilization of cereal protein<br />
may be the presence of undigestible peptides in the end.o-<br />
sperrn fraction (in relation to PRO levels), the levels and.<br />
distribution of nkeyr amj-no acids necessary for enzyrr:atic<br />
cleavage, the possibilíty of naturally occurrin6; cross-<br />
'l inkages and the presence of tannins and anti-trypsi_n<br />
factors.<br />
I7
PART 2.<br />
Protein metabolism in the large<br />
intestine of monogastric animals.<br />
Vilhen protein is ingested by the nonogastric animal<br />
it is subjected to digestion in, basically, two steps. ïn<br />
the first step, protein is subjected to h¡rdrolysís by the<br />
proteolytic enzymes that are secreted by the stomach and<br />
smal1 intestine. The second step consists of fernentation<br />
of undigested protein by the mícro-organisms of the large<br />
intestine.<br />
A very 1ow level of bacterial activity is found<br />
ie the stomach, duodenum and jejumum. Beginning wíth the<br />
distal part. of the ileum important activity can be detected.<br />
Bacterj.al activíty reaches its maximum in the caecu¡n and<br />
decreases fron there to the end of the large intestine<br />
(l,arson and Hill , 1960; inlichel 1961 , 1966).<br />
Protein, both of exogeneous and endogeneous nature,<br />
lhat is not digested. by the end of the srnall intestine v¡ill<br />
either -be excreted Ín the faeces or subjected to fernentation.<br />
Protein digestion by the rnicro-organi sms is brought about by<br />
extracellular enzynes through peptides of decreasing lengt,h<br />
to free amino acids to ammonia and short-chain fatty acids.<br />
Not necessarily all the free an¡ino acids prociuced will be<br />
18
degraded to ammonia and short-chain fatty acids. A certain<br />
proportion may be absorbed by the host animal (if amlno acid<br />
transport systems are present in the epithelial cells of the<br />
large intestine). t'iichel (1961 , 196ó, 1968) incubated a<br />
test amlno acid medium that had been inocuLated h¡ith caecal<br />
bacteria. All anino acids were broken down by deanination,<br />
decarboxylation or desulfhydration. However, of the amíno<br />
acids ARG, HIS, ASP, GLU, SER and THR were degraded the fastest.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> addition, eatabolic activity varied considerably from pig<br />
to pig and seasonal variati-ons were detected.<br />
The final nitrogeneous end product of protein<br />
digestion by the micro-organisns is ammonj-a. Amn¡onia ma;r s1.a<br />
be deríved from peptides, free anino acids and urea that enter<br />
the large intestine as such. The order of preferentíar fer¡nentation<br />
of nitrogeneous compounds by the {lora to yield amraoni a may<br />
probably be classífied as follows: 1) free amino acids and<br />
urea, 2) peptides, 3) soluble protein and 4) insoluble protein.<br />
Ànmonia produced from the nitrogeneous compounds in<br />
the large intestine may be taken up by the nicro-organisms and.<br />
be used for de novo microbial protein synthesis. In short,<br />
a certain anount of protein restructuring and correspond.ing<br />
changes in the proportions of amino acids will take place in the<br />
large intestine. 0n the other hand, a certain anount o.f the<br />
anmonia that is produced in the large íntestine nay be directly<br />
absorbed by the host animal. Part of the bacterial protein<br />
L9
will be excreted as such in the faeces. part will undergo<br />
proteol¡'sis during autodegradation of ihe micro_organi srns .<br />
Ðegradation, as opposed to synthesis, will take over as lhe<br />
micro-organisms move down the large intestine. This is<br />
probably partly due to a decrease ín nutrients available<br />
for the nicro-organisrns. The major end product of proteolysis<br />
of bacterj-al protein is am¡nonia. ËLood draining the co1on,<br />
especially that of the disral part, contains very high revels<br />
of ar¡nonia (trichel , 1966).<br />
The level of bacterial fermentation in the large<br />
intestine has been shown to be affected by the nature of the<br />
carbohydrate portj.on of the diet. i;iason and palmer (192¡ ) fe¿<br />
a diet 'r,o rats that contained egg albumin as the protein<br />
source (r4/" ) an¿ rice starch as the carbohyd:"ate source (soll).<br />
Replacement of rice starch by cornstarch did not increase the<br />
faecar nitrogen excreti-on but a significant i-ncrease was found<br />
when rice starch was replaced by raw potato starch. The<br />
authors suggested that raw potâto starc¡r was digested -,, o a<br />
lesser extent in the small int,estine than corn or rice starch.<br />
Therefore, more carbohydrate l:as available from potato starch<br />
than fron rice or cornstarch to the flora of the large intestine<br />
for fernentation of undigested exogeneous or endogeneous protein<br />
residues. T'he increase in faecal nitrogen excretion due to<br />
dietary inclusion of raw potato starch was associ_ated viith a<br />
pararlel i-ncrease in diaminopi¡¡leli c acid (ÐApÀ) excretion.<br />
20
DAPA is an amino acid that is onÌy found in sorne specíes of bac-<br />
teria and the amount present in faeces would roughly indlcate<br />
the relative amount (not absolute amount ) of microbial synthesis<br />
occurring in the large intestine. ït should be kept in mind Lhat<br />
a certain amount of ÐAPA is also degraded in the large S.ntestine<br />
(Ifason and I'lilne, L97I).<br />
Freeze-dried cod ¡nuscle protein was found to have an<br />
apparent nitrogen digestibility of 90 and 89/" in intact and<br />
caecectomized chicks respectÍvely. Heat-damaged cod nuscle<br />
protein had a nitrogen.digestibility of 77 and. 68fi for intact<br />
and caecectomized chicks (Nesheim and Carpenter, 1966). In<br />
other words, caecectony onl)¡ affected the nitrogen digestibility<br />
of the heat-damaged cod muscle protein. Fernentaticn by the<br />
r¡licro-organisms in the large intestine of the chick for the<br />
utllization of poorly digestible protein was also suggested by<br />
Nitsan (1965) in the digestion of raw soybeans and by Payne<br />
et al. (I9ó8) in the digestion of deteriorated fish concentrates.<br />
Therefore, the nature and or leve1 of undigestible protein, in<br />
addition to carbohydrate digestibility, will also be a factor<br />
that determines the level of bacterial ferÍxentation that takes<br />
place in the large intestine.<br />
fiith germfree (Cf ) aminals it is possible to study<br />
protein metabolism in the animal itself and not the combined<br />
metabolism of the host aninral and its flora. Combe et a1 .<br />
2I
(f965) found twice as mucli sol-uble ni-r,rogen and 50 to tOO<br />
tÍmes as nuch .iree anrino acicis in rhe caecun of GF rals chan<br />
in *"he ceecum of conventional (CV) rats. The ratio of urea<br />
to anmonia was also nruch higher in GF than in CV rats. The<br />
latter is due *"o the absence of bacterial urease in the<br />
ceecu.lnÌ of GF rats. iii.ea accounted for at least 25ii oî 1.rne<br />
faecal nitrogen in GF rats, whereas onì-y traces were found<br />
in the faeces of CV rats (Evrard et aI ., L96\,). Similar<br />
observations were made on GF and CV chicks (Salter and<br />
Coates I97A, L97L) .<br />
lr.ost reports show that GF aninals excrete rûore<br />
faecal nitrogen than CV animals. Hoet g! a1 . (1964) and<br />
L,evenson and Tennant (f96) found twice as nuch faecal nitrogen<br />
excretion for GF rats. tombe et aI . (f965) founci d.ifferences of<br />
a smal-ler rrragnitucie, naneLy JCÍ,. i..iller (L967) and Salier and<br />
Coates (I97L) obtained simil-ar results for GF and L;V chicrs.<br />
However, Lucke5' (1963) found no differences in faecal nitrogen<br />
excretion between GF and CV rats. As was explained prerriousl¡r,<br />
the levei of bacterlal fermentation nay be affected b1, the<br />
digestibility co.efficients andr/or nature of the dietary<br />
carbohydrate and protein. These factors may partially explain<br />
the variabie resul!s obtained betv/een the faecal nJ.trogen<br />
excretion from GF and CV animals. Fæ exanple, a high15'<br />
digestible diet fed to GF and CV an͡cals may only result in
minimal differences between the 1evels of faecal nitrogen<br />
excretion. And indeed, the diet used by Luckey (f963 ) r^¡iro<br />
found no differences between the faecal nitrogen excretion<br />
from GF and CV rats, was of a highly ciigestible nature.<br />
The higher levels of nitrogen in the caecum of<br />
GF rats contribute to the higher levels of faecal nitrogen<br />
excretion. Hor^rever, there still is a net disappearence of<br />
nitrogen between the end of the ileum and the rectun<br />
(Ioesche, 1968). The levels of digestive enzy!¡es are nruch<br />
higher in the contents of the caecum of GF rats than in the<br />
caecum of CV rats (Loesche, 1968). Nornal digestion may<br />
thus proceed longer in GF animals. In addition, the free<br />
amino acids produced wilL be available for absorption by the<br />
animal since they are not subjected to deanination by the<br />
micro-organisms to yield arnmonia and short-chain fatty acids<br />
which can be used for de novo microbial protein synthesis.<br />
The micro-organisms of the large intestine have been<br />
strongly inpl"icated in the recovery of endogeneous protein.<br />
The Ievels of digestive enzymes and mucotrE oteins in caecal_<br />
contents and faeces were found to be much higher in GF than<br />
in CV animals (Ðorgström et aI . ,1959; Lindstedt et al . ,1965;<br />
Loesche 1968). Salter and Fulford (1974) concluded that the<br />
micro-organisms are only important with respect to the degra-<br />
dation and recycling of endogeneous protein and that they âre<br />
ta
of ninor importance in the degradation of dietary prclein.<br />
A protein-free diet and a diet containing poorljt digestible<br />
protein (heat-dar':raged egg albumin) were fed to GF and CV<br />
chicks. The endogeneous nitrogen excretion was higher for<br />
the GF than CV chiclcs. They found no difference between the<br />
GF and CV chicks that were fed the heat-darnaged egg albumin<br />
diet. Iiotnrever, as was pointed out by the authorsr themselves,<br />
they inair have heat damaged the protein too severelrv. Even<br />
nicro-organisns can not completely breal:dov/n tco severel¡r<br />
heated proteins (Srbersdobtçr and Riedel , Lg?O). In contrast<br />
soine bacterial ciegradation oí poorly digestible protein<br />
(fron heat-damaged fish protein) was shown by work by<br />
Carpenter and Nesheim (1966) and by Payne g! g!. (1966).<br />
The form in ¡r'hich ni-trogen i s absorbed in the large<br />
intestine will determine the possible benefit that the hosl<br />
aninal might derive from the micro -organi sms . ïf nitrogen<br />
were absorbed as arnmonia it would general-ly be of limited<br />
value to the animal-. <strong>fn</strong> certain instances, ammonia iaay improve<br />
the protein status of animals fed low protein diets because more<br />
non-essential amino acids can be produced and this in turn nay<br />
have a trsparing effectrr on the essential amino acids in the<br />
bod;r.<br />
.<br />
Salter and Coates (I97Ll fed freeze-dried and<br />
autocla¡,'ed IôC-1"b"11"d esg vrhite +"c GF and CV chicks. I,lo
difference was found. betr¡¡een the 14C : N ratios of the digesta<br />
fron GF and CV chicks in the upper gut. However, the ratios<br />
were consistently higher for CV animals j-n the lower gut.<br />
Their findings can be explained by bactería} proi:eolysis<br />
and deamination of ar¿ino acids with subsequent absorption<br />
of ammonia. They also reported that the level of an¡:onia<br />
in caecal contents was five tinres greater in the CV than in the GF<br />
chicks. In additíon they found a higher excreij.on of uric<br />
acid by the CV animals. Ì¡larren and lrÏewton (1959) detected a<br />
fourfold increase in ammonia concentration in the portal<br />
blood of CV as compared to GF guinea pigs.<br />
Salter et a1 . (L974) fed several poor quality proteins<br />
to GF and CV chicks and deternined the net protein utilization<br />
(XIPU) by nitrogen balance ¡nethods. NPU determinatj.on would<br />
be a good indicator of whether the host ani¡:al derives<br />
anl¡ nutritional benefit from the action of the r,ricroflora.<br />
Poor quality proteins were represented by sesame protein,<br />
which is deficient in LIS, and by heat-damaged egg albumin<br />
and cod nuscle. A relatively large proportion of the latter<br />
protei.ns v¡ould remain undigested in the snal1 intestine and<br />
would be available for microbial fernentation in the large<br />
intestine (unless too severely heated). They founci no<br />
differences in NPU between GF and tV ciricks for eiiiier the<br />
heat-damaged egg albunin or cod muscle. There was a sl_ight<br />
25
ut significant difference between GF and CV chicks fed<br />
sesame protein but t,his could not be confirmed in later<br />
studi-es. ilith t,he heat-damaged proteins, the excretion of<br />
uric acid tended to be higher in CV than GF chicks. The<br />
authors conclude that most of the nitrogen that disappears<br />
from the large intestine is in the form of amr¡onia and<br />
that the microflora merely chang e the route of nitrogen<br />
excretion. The latter could be of help to the protein<br />
status of aninals fed Iow protein diets.<br />
Wysocki and Baker (I972) studied bacterial protein<br />
digestion in the equine lower gut. 14C-1"b"II"d bacteria<br />
were infused into the caecurn of a caecal-fistulated pon3r<br />
that was anaesthetj-zed. Negligible anounts of 14C were<br />
detected in the deproteinized plesna amino acid fraction<br />
of portal blood. They suggest the conversion of bacterial<br />
protein to ammonia upon autodegradation of the nicro-<br />
organisms. However, in a similar type of experiment,<br />
Slade g! g!. (Lglir) showed that rnicrobial protein can be<br />
degraded to yield amino acids r,rhich are absorbed in the<br />
caecum of the horse. However, the rnagnitude of absorption<br />
and therefore the nutritional significance was not established.<br />
Hoover and Heítman (I975) found considerable fermentation of<br />
l4C-a1anin" in both the caecum and upper col-on contents of<br />
rabbi.ts, but there was little abso:'ption of f40-alanine<br />
26
into the bL ood .<br />
.{minc acid availability estirnates determined by<br />
growth nethods are generall,w lower than those determined by<br />
the faecai" analysls met,hod (Oal-houn et al ., 1960; Gupta et aI .,<br />
l-958; de ì,uel-enaere ei aI ., L96?; iriesheim and Carpenter L967).<br />
Bacterial degradation of amino acids to ammonia in the large<br />
-intestine may be the reason for overestir¿ation oí the actual<br />
amino acid avaiiabilities as deiermined by the faecal<br />
analysis method.<br />
îo summarize what was discussed, bacterial<br />
degradation of und.J.gested protein in the large intestine<br />
results in the for¡ration of ammonia as the nrajor nitrogeneous<br />
end product. Ammonia nay then be absorbed by the animal or<br />
may be taken up by the rni cro-organi sms for de novo microbiaL<br />
protein synthesis. Part of the microbial pro-r,ein will be<br />
excreted as such in the faeces while part of the micro-organisms<br />
will undergo autodegradation. Autodegradation of microbial<br />
protein results in the production of an:nonia as the r:ajor<br />
enciproduct, which j-s absorbeci by the host animaL. Thus, a<br />
certaj-n anount of protein restructuring will take place in<br />
the large intestine fronr undigested exogeneous and endogeneous<br />
protein with r.esultant changes in the prooortions of anino<br />
acids. Consequently, amino acid availabilities deternined with<br />
the faecal analirsis nethod could be i.naccurate. As was pointed<br />
out, the degree of inaccuracl/ nay be depenrìent on ciietary<br />
factors such as cerbohydrate and protein digestibility.
PART 3.<br />
Ðeterrnination of amino acid availabilities<br />
by ileal sanpling from cannulated animals,<br />
by ileal sampling from sacrificed animals,<br />
. by removal of the caeeum and<br />
by aid of germ-free and antibiotic treated animals.<br />
Several approaches can be made to determine anino<br />
acid availabilities that may or may not be partially confound.ed<br />
by protein metabolism in the lower gut. Each approach has<br />
its partÍcular advantages and disadvantages.<br />
Ileal sampling by eg4nulation: liiore vaÌ.id amino<br />
acid availability estimates wil1 be obtained. when the digesta<br />
are collected at the end of the ileun as conpared to faecal<br />
collections.<br />
Continuous collection of ileat digesta at the end<br />
of the ileum can be achieved by the use of í1eal re-entrant<br />
cannulae (Holnes et al ., I97l+'Ì or by ii-eal-caecal re-entrant<br />
cannulae (Easter , I97 Zl . Ileal--caecal cannulae were found to<br />
cause fewer problems in ¡saintaining an unrestricted flow<br />
(Easter, 1972). Use of the ileal re-entrant system will give<br />
a closer approximation to the digestive processes in situ as<br />
compared. to the use of the ileal-caecal re-entrant system.<br />
The latter system bypasses the ileal-caecal valve and all<br />
digesta passes through the caecum flrst before entering the<br />
colon. About one-third to two-thirds of the ireal flow enters
into the colon directly under normal conditions, while the<br />
remainder enters into the caecuro (Farrell and Johnson , L972;<br />
Ho1mes et al. , 1974).<br />
Surgical modifÍcations of the digestive tract,<br />
such as the incorporation of re-entrant cannulae will in all<br />
likelyhood slow down the rate of passage of digesta. Pu1se et<br />
at. (19731 studied the effects of caecal fistulation upon<br />
nutrient digestion and rate of passage in horses. . They found<br />
significant increases in crude fiber and. ether extract<br />
digestion following fistul-ation. Dry maller, gross energy<br />
and crude protein digestibilities did not change. Retention<br />
tines of chronic oxide and pol:/ethelene increased significantly.<br />
Easter (1972) deter¡nined the apparent ileal and<br />
faecal anrino acid availabilities of corn and sorghum grain in<br />
pigs, using ileal-caecal re-entrant cannulae. .t-aecal<br />
availability values were significantly higher than ilea1<br />
estinates. The difference varied for each amino acid,<br />
ranging fronr 10 percentage units for TTR to JO percentage units<br />
for GLY for both cereals. Lysine is often the most limiting<br />
amino acíd for pigs fed corn or sorghum grain. the ileal and<br />
faecal l,IS avaitabilities from corn were 65 and 85,4" respectively.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> the sarne order, they were 59 and 78% for sorghum grain.<br />
Therefore, the faecal analysis method may overestimate the<br />
actual LYS availabilities fron corn and. sorghum grain to a<br />
relatively large extent.<br />
)o
äoLmes et aI . (L974) determined the ileaL and<br />
faecal anino acici availabili-'bi.e s from soybean neal (SEì.i)<br />
and :'apeseed neal (RSI"I) using pigs fitted with ileal<br />
re-enrrant cannulae. The disappearance of nitrogen in<br />
the large intestine was 9 and L6fà for SEìi and R.Sì,i respectively.<br />
l,'i ith the exception of ÀRG and l,,i:.1T, the faecal<br />
availabilities of the essenti.al amino acids were higher than<br />
their corresponding i1ea1 availabilities. The dj.fference<br />
varied .frorn 5.7 for IÍAL to 1.2i4 for LYS from SBij and from<br />
U.ó for VÁ,l to !.2,,:i îor äIS frorn F,Si,i. iu.ethionine is eften<br />
a lindting amino acid for pigs fed SLi,i or RSI'. and the ileal<br />
and faecal availabilities were 96.7 and Z9.ll respect;ve1l, for<br />
SE],{ and 92.5 and 81 .0;l respectively for RSl.i. <strong>fn</strong> other vÍords,<br />
there was more bacterial s;,'nthesis than degradation of i,ËT.<br />
and its availability vras underestinaled by the faecal<br />
analysi.s method. lTith the exception of CyS and TyR, the faecal<br />
avail-abilities of the non-essential amino acids were higher<br />
than thei¡' corresponding ileal availabilities. The dis-<br />
appearance of PF.O was the most extensive and was approxlmately-<br />
25 percentage uníts for both SEi; and RSi,i.<br />
Collection of ileal diEesta from sacrificed. animals.<br />
Cho et al . (1971), using pigs fi_tted with ileal<br />
re-entrant cannul_ae, detected marheci differences between the<br />
amino acid cornposition of i1eal digesta that was collecteci<br />
3o
during different time int,erval_s following ingestion of -r,he<br />
test diets (SEì". and i.S;i) b)' the ani¡na1s. Fract j-onat j-on<br />
of dietary components in the stonach and to a lesser extent<br />
in the smal1 intestine is probably responsibJ-e for -,.he<br />
variation in the composition of ileal digesta. The work<br />
by Cho et al-. (1971 ) suggests the necessity for a contj_n-<br />
uous colLection of the dígesta from the ileu¡n as can be<br />
performed by :'e-entrant cannulae. Consequeni:ly, amino<br />
acid availabilities, determined from sanples taken from<br />
the end of the small intestine from sacrificed ani-nal s<br />
rnay be inaccurate since these are dependeni on the tine<br />
at which the animal is killed following ingestion of a<br />
-r"est ¡rea1 . <strong>fn</strong> addition, it is ofte¡r very Cifficult to<br />
obtain sufficient sarnple for anal],sis when only the digesta<br />
near -r,he very end of the sma11 in.Lestine from sacrifíced<br />
animals is collected. Cne often has to take all the digesta<br />
from a relati vely large section of the ileum.<br />
R.enoval of the cae cu¡:.<br />
This surgical procedure results only in a partial<br />
decrease of total bacteriar- acti'ity in the large intestine.<br />
Eacterial activit¡r in the colon renains.<br />
Lloyd et a1 . (f.958) studied protei-n d.igesrion in<br />
whole and caecectonized pigs, ranging in ege frorn B to 2B<br />
lveeks. The renoval cf the caecum resulted. only in a slight<br />
decrease in protein digestibility. Caecectomy in chiclcs<br />
3r
decreased the protein Cigestibilitr¡ of heat-danaged<br />
cod rauscle from 77 to 68:¿ (t,íesheir¿ and Carpent er , 196Z ) .<br />
Specific amino acid availabilities have not been studied wilh<br />
caecectonrized animals.<br />
Gerrnfree ani¡nals: Diets fed to GF aninals must be<br />
sterilized by either heat, radiatíon or chenical agents. Even<br />
well-defined diets nay undergo changes of uncertain character.<br />
The use of GF anj.¡ral s is linited lo sraall laboratory specj-es<br />
onl=y.<br />
Gorcion and Víostnann (1960) reported lower weights<br />
of the smal-l intestine of GF than in CV rats. The rate of<br />
renewal of the nucosâ of the sriall intestine tras :'educed in<br />
the GI rats (Äbrams et ai., L963). The surface area of the<br />
sna1l intestine rvas reduced in the CF rat and r,¡a s 3 Ofã less<br />
than in CV rats (Gordon and Eruckner-jiardo ss , 19ól). The<br />
changes described nay have an effect on protein digestion<br />
and amino acid absorption in the snall intestine. Tlius,<br />
digestion data obtained fron GF animal_s shoulci be ca:.efuilv<br />
interpreted.<br />
ireatment, with antibiotics.<br />
The characterj-stics of the snall intestine of<br />
aninals receiving relativel5r large anounts of antibiotics<br />
approxima',"e these of GF animals, particularly with regard.<br />
to the reduction in t,hickness of the snall intestine<br />
(Fauconneau and irlichel , l-gTO) .<br />
32
ì.',ril;en (I952) Cet:rr:ineC the faecal a::i::o acj.d<br />
availabilities fz.cn ccttonseeC ::eet uith or :.¡:-thout suLi-<br />
^!'-.: ^.-^1 ^ | ^L - .f ---^l -..' ..' ;- -.^^ *^-..On). Ft:Cal_ a::inO<br />
ecli avail a'ci1i'r.ies r,lei-e not cheng3d b;: su:pl enenta t,ion of<br />
the antibiotíc. Faecal_ anino scid availabil ities obtaineC<br />
wi+.h rats fed ba:.1e;' supple::renteC. v.¡!th chl orr- etrå c;- cl ine<br />
(20 pp:) or s;.1f:thiazcLe ( 2',", i:r the diet) r"¡ere sli¡htli-<br />
higher than those obtainei .fron rats thet were fei ba:'le;'<br />
r¡i'uhout *.ire an:ibiotics (iggun, L973), lhe Ciíierences fo:.<br />
the indi';idual aEÍno acids ranged fron 1 to 5 percentage<br />
ft is reasonable to assunie that a red.uction occuxs<br />
in total bacte:'ial actir¡itl¡ upon dietar;' antibio.uic supple_<br />
:Íêntaiíon. The extent to l¡hich this occurreC (ì-.e. 'c5.<br />
'caeteri.al count,s on feecel naterial ) nas no-,, neasure.d by<br />
l'iuiken (L?52) arcì ìgg..n (L9?3).<br />
33
\f rì/.l.' I<br />
¡.__L- _:ii---:ù .L-i..J _. _: i-- JJJ<br />
lìigh and 1ow p¡ç¡3i¡ s¡rê.ins of '¡he at (13.3 an¿<br />
LL.2:,), anri barl-e:' (11-.1+ end g. 5i.\ v:ere se1:cted fcr test<br />
Furposes. lt lvas nct possible tc cbtain high and low<br />
l:ctein st:'ains cf the sene :,.¿ii:t-'. Th: high prot:in<br />
wl::at lvas of the Glenlea ¡¡arietl,. whiie the iow prctein<br />
vil:ee t ì,^re s cí an unkncnn varlet j¡. The hi¡h end low prote in<br />
i:a:'1e1. were oÍ +.he Fergus anC Terta ve -l. j-e t j.- respectir,,"Jl-1¡,<br />
-¡.11 rrai:rs v;e re purchaseC Cii'ectlv frc¡:l far:-:rs.<br />
The kernels v¡er-e e'ora sei b;: aid cf e s¡nall<br />
la'ccratcr.' pearling r:iachine tc ..'ieid the rendosceÌ.n[ end.<br />
rlcï'entt fracticns. The ab:-aseci k-ernels v..¡e re naneC the<br />
endcsperm frection, The h ig.hl¡,' jlbrcus feed ieft after<br />
pearling rvas nameC the bran fracticn, ft 'r¡as attenËteC bjr<br />
p?erling to ebrese the kernel-s in such â nanner that ail<br />
¿leurcne protein tvcuid be ccnteineC in the 'cr.an íracticn.<br />
in acidi'r,ion, it was etter::Þtei to :rininize c:rr1..-cver ci<br />
endcspern prct,ein intc the bran fr.acticn. The ker.nels,<br />
5C 4 at a ti¡ne, 1¡rere peerled at intervals oí ¿. consecutiye<br />
seccnis. This wês repeeted , tir.es fcr. each tir.e of<br />
ebrasion. ìue to the harclness cf its !ç3r-noì s il¡a I,-r.,<br />
3l+
protein wheat was abrased at intervals of g Ínstead of l¡<br />
consecutive seconds. The abrased parts hrere poored together,<br />
weighed and analyzed for nitrogen. The concentration of<br />
nitrogen in the fractions obtained during each time intervat<br />
of abrasÍon are shown in Tabte 5.<br />
As was pointed out in the review of literature,<br />
the outer layers of the cereal grains contain the aleurone<br />
ceI1 1a1'ç¡. 0f these layers, the aleurone cell 1ayer has<br />
the highest protein content. There was a mariced. depression<br />
in the nitrogen content at the t+O-Lg, 24_28 and 20_24 second<br />
interval for low pro-,.ein wheat, high and 1or^r protein barley<br />
respectively (Table 5). <strong>fn</strong> the sarne order, the kernels of<br />
these grains were routinely abrased for dg, Zg and. 24<br />
seconds untíl sufficient a¡rounts were obtained of the bran<br />
and endosperrn fractions for test purposes. For the high<br />
protein wheat there was a depression in the nitrogen con_<br />
tent of the fraction obtained in the L6-20 second interval .<br />
Hov¿ever, the nitrogen content of the fracti-ons that follor¡¡ed.<br />
increased until it was marlcedly depressed again at the<br />
fraction collected in the )2-36 second interval . Eased on<br />
the se dala , it r,i¡as de cided to abrase the high protein<br />
wheat for 20 seconds.<br />
As will be di.scussed later, the high protein wheat<br />
should perhaps have been abrased ror 36 seconos in orcÌer ¿o
TABLE 5. Percent nitrogen of v¡heat and barley fractions<br />
obtained at different ti¡ce intervalå of abrasion.<br />
CEREAL GRAIN WHEAT<br />
LEVET, 0F PRoTETN (ø) 18.3 u.21 11.¿ 8.1<br />
ÎTME IIYTERVAL OF<br />
-@-(Eãõnds)<br />
0-4<br />
4-8<br />
8-L2<br />
L2-t6<br />
L6-20<br />
20-2t+<br />
2b-28<br />
28-32<br />
32-36<br />
36-h,o<br />
40-44<br />
44-48<br />
l+8-52<br />
Ê,t-14<br />
o.96<br />
3.L9<br />
l+.LIt<br />
lr. l+7<br />
3.10<br />
I+. l+5<br />
L.36<br />
3.6t+<br />
3.Ll+<br />
3.06<br />
2.86<br />
1.14<br />
t,o7 L.g5<br />
2.59<br />
2,L7 3.25<br />
3 'LI+<br />
2.69 2.9L<br />
a 1Ê<br />
..))<br />
2.56 2.r5<br />
2.24<br />
1.84<br />
1ÃO<br />
L.29<br />
2,50<br />
t.40<br />
2.18<br />
1.59<br />
1.20<br />
1 V.Lr.r"" in this column were<br />
I consecutive seconds (e.g. deterrnined at intervals of<br />
L.OV"N in 0-8 second iraãtion).<br />
36
obtain a aore conrplete seperation of the aleurone proiein<br />
fror¡r the endosperm proiein.<br />
The whole kernels and the fraciions obtained .,¡¡ere<br />
ground through a 2.00 m¡ screen, fortified with vitanins<br />
and minerals (Table 6)r nixed and nade into cru¡nbles. The<br />
crumbles were prepared as foLlows: the mixed diets were<br />
spread out into a thin layer of approximately O.25 cn.<br />
thickness, sprinkled wi.th water, kneaded loosely ínto small<br />
Itpefletsn of approximatety 0.5 cnr. diameter and dried. at<br />
50 oC in a forced drafi oven. The Ciets took on the<br />
appearance of crumbles.<br />
The test diets (Table 6) were fed for 4 days<br />
io 60 nale growi ng l{is-r,ar rats. Their ini-tia1 average<br />
weight was 98 g the day prior to the start of the test period.<br />
Each diet was individuatly fed to 5 rats each. The experinrent<br />
was repeated when the rats weighed IJO grams.<br />
Two protein-free diets containing lO and 20i3 alphafloc<br />
were fed to the same rats for a period of 2 days for -,,he<br />
determination of the netabolic faecal amino acid. excretion<br />
(Table 6). Faecal eollections from 2 rats, fed the sane<br />
prot,ein-free diet, vrere pooled on the basis of sinilar (or<br />
nearl¡r similar) dry rûatter intal
TÂBIE 6. Fo¡nuletion of test dielrs for study 1.<br />
CDREÂL<br />
COMPO¡¡ENT<br />
lngredtents (ø):<br />
ÏII'EAT<br />
l¡rhole 9).5<br />
Bran<br />
Endosperm<br />
BARI,ET<br />
!,lhote<br />
Bran<br />
Endosperî<br />
Sucroge<br />
Àlphafloc<br />
Soybean oLl 3.O<br />
CalcLìrl¡ carbonate L,3<br />
Dlcalclûnphosphate O,?<br />
Vita¡nin Þrenlx¿ 1.O<br />
Mineral iremix3 0.5<br />
HICH PROTEINïIHEÀT<br />
(rd.3ø)r<br />
WHOI,E BRI\N ENDO.<br />
W1IEAT SPERM<br />
LOIÍ PROTEIN<br />
v,rnEÂT (1r.2ø )r<br />
WIIOI,E BRAN ENDO. WflOT,E BRAN<br />
!.¡HEiIT SPERM BARLEÍ<br />
Velues ln parentheses lndicate the level of proteln es a peicent of dry natt€r,<br />
SuÞpued (kB díet): vltamin A ?150 Iûr vitânln D 818 IU: vtråntn E s-5 rtr!<br />
illiliö,ituil¡!,if;å.fíÌ31ïåå'å,i.;,î",i"iåån*"iiï ffiá"]l;8,ifå lil,låî,"<br />
penlcrl.l.ld-st¡epto¡lycln 2ö. l} ng.<br />
Suppued (kg diet)f l4anganese 8I.l¡ ng; zlnc It flg; l¡on 35.2 ngi coppet 6.6ngi<br />
iodlzed salt lr.7 C,<br />
93.5<br />
9r,5<br />
9J .5<br />
3.0 3.O t.o 1.O 3.0 3.o<br />
4.0 2.9 L.3 4,0 2,o r.3<br />
, 1,0 o.? 1.0 O.?<br />
1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 ¡. O<br />
o.5 0., o., 0., o.5 0:i<br />
IIIOH PROTETN<br />
BÁRI,EY (IT.4ø)<br />
9L.5<br />
3.O<br />
4.0<br />
1.O<br />
0.5<br />
LOIV PROTETN<br />
BARtEy (8.1ø )<br />
ENDO- WHOI,D BRAN ENDO.<br />
SÞEn¡r Ë]in¡¡r õilõñ¡,<br />
93 .5<br />
9L,5<br />
,,0 3,o 3.O 3.0<br />
2.O ¡..3<br />
2.0<br />
1.0 o,7 '+.O t. O<br />
l.o 1,0 1.0 1-O<br />
o.5 0,5 0,5 0.5<br />
PNOTDTN- TN¡E<br />
Lt/" 2@<br />
ALPHA- ALPHA-<br />
FI,OC I,'LOC<br />
81.O<br />
10. o<br />
5.O<br />
2,O<br />
r,o<br />
o.5<br />
oq<br />
7L.O<br />
20.0<br />
5.O<br />
0.,<br />
2.O<br />
l.o<br />
o.5
 basic diet (Giovannettj_ et âI ., lgTO) was fed<br />
when the rats Ïrere not on test. One percent ferric oxide<br />
was incorporated into this diet in order to permit easier<br />
identification and collection of faeces resulting from<br />
the test and protein-free diets. The besic and. proteinfree<br />
diets were fed as pelle'us of 1. ó cm. d j.aneter.<br />
The rats were housed individuall_y in suspend,ed<br />
wire-bottom cages, in an environmentally controlled roor¡<br />
at a temperature of 2loC. Feed and water were supplied<br />
ad libitum at all times.<br />
Originally, during the first collection when the<br />
rats hrere Íed the protein-free diets faeces were col_lected.<br />
in a tray. Filter paper was placed on the bottom of the<br />
tray. This was thought to result in only a smaLl anount<br />
of contamination of faecal pellets with urine. For<br />
inprovement of the collection rnethod, faeces were gathered.<br />
on a screen on top of the irays during the following<br />
collections.<br />
The total amount of feed consumed and faeces<br />
produced fron ihe test diets were recorded. Apparent anino<br />
acid availability estÍnates were deternined by neasuring the<br />
total amount of each amino acid ingested and lost in the<br />
faeces. ì''ietabolic faecal amino acid losses were considered<br />
for the estimation of true amino acid availabilities.<br />
39
Study 2.<br />
This study was subdj_vided into study 2a and 2b.<br />
Study 2a dealt with the determination of ileal and faecal_<br />
amÍno acid availabilities fron selectecl cereal graíns by<br />
use of pigs fitted with ileocaecal re-enNrant cannulae.<br />
Study 2b was caruied out to determine if faecal availability<br />
esti¡nates obtained frcm cannulated pigs were representative<br />
of ¡hose of normal pigs.<br />
Studv 2a.<br />
The apparent ileaI and faecal amino acid availabilities<br />
frorn barle¡' (Herta ) , comrnercial corn and .'¡heat (G1en1ea ) were<br />
determined with 6 lianagra barrows. Ì,ietabolic ileal and<br />
faecal amino acid levels were estimated with 2 purified diets<br />
containing 2 leveIs of fiber (Table 7).<br />
fl-eocaecal re-entrant cannulae were fitted to bar-<br />
rows weighing J9 to 43 kg. The animals weighed 75 to 82 kg. at<br />
the end of the experiment.<br />
the technique for re-entrant ileocaecal cannulation<br />
developed by traster and Tanksley (1973) for pigs was used.<br />
T¡rpe and size of cannulae used: a di.agrain of the t¡rpe<br />
and size of the cannulae used is shown in Fig. I. The can_<br />
nurae were made from polyvinyl chlorid e plastisol . The thickness<br />
of the cannulae is indicateci by the tiotteti. Ii nes in iiie<br />
side view of the diagran. The top view shows -r,he size of the<br />
40
TABLE 7. Fornulation of diets for study 2.<br />
DIETS<br />
LEVEL OF AIPHATLOC (ø)<br />
Ingredients (Ø):<br />
Barley<br />
Corn<br />
Vrlheat<br />
Soybean meal<br />
Cas ein<br />
Cornstarch<br />
Alphafloc<br />
Sucrose<br />
Soybgan oil<br />
Saltr<br />
Calciun carbonate<br />
DicaLcium phosphate<br />
Vltamin-antíbiórie<br />
'Premix2<br />
Chromic oxide<br />
GROWER<br />
82,50<br />
Lt+.50<br />
o.5o<br />
L.25<br />
o.75<br />
o.5o<br />
+<br />
97.OO<br />
0.50<br />
L.25<br />
o.75<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
97,O0<br />
o.5o<br />
L.25<br />
o.75<br />
0.50<br />
IIIHEAT<br />
97.40<br />
MAINTENANCE<br />
7LL<br />
Supplied,(kg diet): sodium chloride 4.i3 g; zinc ZO mg; iron 30 ng; manganese 6 mg,<br />
copper L6J ngi iodine .33 ngi cobaLr .ZO me.<br />
supnlied (tg ¿iet ): viramin A 22oo ru; vitamin D 33o lu; vltamln Brc r1-o uø:<br />
DL-o4-r'ocopheryt- acetar"_Il *s; rhiamine hydrochroriãã r.r'*eJ-.lbåÃ"iÅ"âi,2"fti,.<br />
calcium-D-pantothenate 100 mei pyrtdoxine'¡v¿roã¡iõri¿ã-ir.õ'reJ-.iËäiiüiã'ã"iå'<br />
1O.O mg; ASP-250 rg.<br />
+<br />
o.5o<br />
L.25<br />
o.75<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
4.00<br />
63.00<br />
7.OO<br />
2]-.50<br />
1.00<br />
o'50<br />
o.5o<br />
2.00<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
&.00<br />
63. oo<br />
ltl.00<br />
1lt.50<br />
t-.00<br />
o'50<br />
0.50<br />
2.00<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
ts
FIGUBE 1. Type and size of cannulae used.<br />
( flattened )<br />
I1ea1 Cannula<br />
Side View<br />
Front Vi.ew<br />
SCALE I:I
flarqes lçhen the se are fl-atteneC cu-,. The flanges -*e re<br />
ÌieCe in such a nênner as tc conícr-n to the lu:en of the<br />
il-e un ¿nC the c¿ecur (frcnt viet;). !he iIeaI an.j caecal<br />
cannulae tl'ere connecteC b¡,' aid of e j cn. co1'¡v inj¡l- c hlcrid e<br />
Pre and post-cperative care: the barrcr¡rs we:-e<br />
hcused in indi.¡id.ual netabolisn câEes icr ! da¡'s befcrr<br />
surgerl¡ was pe r.fcri::ed. The pigs '¡i e re stel.ved the dai.,<br />
before the operation ând wer.e siven therâÐeutic let-els of<br />
antibictics (Pen-Di-Strep) bi' intr-anuscular in-iection.<br />
l-dninistration o-f ântibiotics was continued e.,rerirdav after<br />
the operaticn until the anirnals seeneci to be reccvereC.<br />
pecovery was incicated b¡r hear ing cf the tissue arcund the<br />
cannr¡l-ae, nol'nal rectal tenperature ê.nC Ì'eturn tc nornal<br />
f:eC ccnsu¡npticn.<br />
The pies were given access to a 1icuiC diet for<br />
I ia¡.'s afr-er the cperation tc mininize biockage b¡, digesta.<br />
The licuid Ciet. ccnsisted cf 9 parts rvater and I pêr.t Ír.il_k<br />
replacer. Êloclcege cf diEesta ciu:'ing the fí:.st fer¡ Ca..s<br />
efter the cperation couli be vei'.'¡ cr.iticai. A.t this ste€e,<br />
there is no firn fibrcus aChesicn between the viscer.aiani<br />
Êarietel la"ors cf the p3riton€urìi, )ispla.cenent anC<br />
ìoss of cannulae is usuall¡r irreversible d.u:.ing this tine,<br />
unless the aninal is sub;'ected to fui-the r sureerl,.<br />
l+3
Fol-lowin.e the liouid diet, the barr.ows were given<br />
eccess to the grower ration (Table ?) untÍI placed on test.<br />
i.eadiness for test .1'¿ì s -:,ij::rci bl; nornal dietary i_ntake of<br />
the grower ¡'ation for 4 to 5 consecutive days by aII pigs.<br />
The barror¡s were switcired to their :'espective iest diets<br />
12 da.r's after the operation.<br />
Problens associated with cannulation o.f pigs:<br />
blockage o.f di.gesta was shor,.,'n by abnornal leakage around the<br />
ileal cannule, conconi tênt lrri th an acute drop in feed<br />
intake. The pigs were fecì J t|nes dailir ¿¡d usuailT con_<br />
suned alL tire feed that v;as supplieci rr¡iihin one hour after<br />
feedlng. lione or partial consu;nption usually inCicated<br />
blocicage. The interconnecting tube was renoved and v;arm t¡ater<br />
t¿¡as flushed into the ileun until nor¡:ar flow v¡as reestablisheci.<br />
?hereafter, pigs went on feed. again within a couple of hours.<br />
The frequency of b]-ockage was verj¡ dependent on the type of<br />
diet fed. Elockage of digesta was a serious problem when -r,he<br />
pigs rvere fed the rr.-l_4 diet(yie. ¿).<br />
Ëlockage lvas also caused by the rcurling uprr o.f the<br />
f,langes of the ileal- cannula and .wâs corz,ected. by removing tÌre<br />
cannula and replacing it wit,h one thai had a less flexible<br />
( -r,htci
and the flow of digesta was often cut off. This condition<br />
r"iê. s corrected by removing the cannula and repl acing it t/ith<br />
one that had a larger and thicker flange.<br />
Formation of a ttpocketrr (hypertrophy of the distaL<br />
end of the ileum ) oc curyed in one i-nstance , namely to pig<br />
number 5. This condition resulted ín accumulation of<br />
relatively dry digesta in the ,npockettr. peristalsis<br />
'squeezed out the lio.uid part o.f the digesta and. intestinal f10lv<br />
c arile to a ha1t. ihis condition could not be corrected and<br />
pig number J was replaced by nu¡ber Z (Fig. 2). FÌovrever,<br />
the first test period for pig nu¡¿ber 7 (diet1'ï_Z) diA not<br />
start until the other 5 pigs hrere on the last test period<br />
for the cereal grains (days34-40).<br />
Build-up of pressure due to blockage and rubbing of<br />
the cannulae against the steel bars of the cages by the pigs<br />
someti¡nes resulted in disconnection of the ilea1 ard caecal-<br />
cannulae and large amount s of digesta were lost. About<br />
2C0 m1 . of O.9{" sodiumchloride was infused into the caecum<br />
before reconnecting the cannulae.<br />
At times, the caecal cannulae were lost in the<br />
lumen of the large intestÍne and could not be retrieved.<br />
A spare caecal cannula was Ínserted. The lost cannula<br />
appeared in the faeces 48 to 72 hours l_ater.<br />
The pigs had to be prevenred frorn laying on tireir<br />
right side (where the cannulae were inserted) during.the<br />
b5
2d-ìrou:' collection. i,!j.ld ph]'sica1 restraint vras appt isd<br />
and the pigs becane grâdual1:¡ trained to lie on their left<br />
side during coLle ction.<br />
Feed preparation: barle¡.', corn and v",heat ln¡ere<br />
ground through a lt/I6, 3/L6 and l_ inch screen respectively.<br />
The ground naterj-al was nixed with vit,anins and ninerals<br />
end made into pellets of 0. J cin. diar,reter in a steern<br />
pe]-Iet niu (câlifo'nia pelì-et milr). îhe naintenance di.ers<br />
wer"e made into pellets of 0.25 cn. in a snall laborator;r<br />
pelLet mill- (Superior-Tenplewood clrl, pellet ¡rill ).<br />
!'eeciing reginen: equal anounls of feed. uere<br />
offered J tines dail¡z at 6:CO A.Ì.., 2:AO p.Ì1. and lO:OO p.Ì,1.<br />
The average daily intake of the grower ration (average of<br />
all pigs) was recorded and cieten¿ined the daili, allowable<br />
intake of lhe test d.iets for the period following. The<br />
ailowable intake was calculated io the nearest JO or<br />
100 grans (Fig. 2). l,iater v¡as supplied ad libitun at all<br />
ti¡ne s .<br />
Ixperirnental design: the experirnent was condu.cied<br />
as a si-nple ci.oss-over desi.gn in which il.,¡o 'barrov;s were .fed<br />
iÌ:s I cereaL diets at I different periods
FICURE 2. Experinentål deslgn ancì allowebl-e dietary intake for study 2a.<br />
DAYl<br />
PIG NO. 2<br />
5<br />
1<br />
6<br />
À<br />
(71<br />
ÀLtoirrÂBlE<br />
DIETARY INTÂKEJ<br />
t-7 8-1r 12_18<br />
Y-72 GR2 'l¡2 cR Ð2 cR<br />
II-7 GR W GR õ öii<br />
YI-? GR C GR r,,I cR<br />
rr-7 cR c GR !r cä<br />
M-7 CR B ON C GII<br />
'I!1.7 GR B GR C Cii<br />
1800<br />
Day l indicates the lzth day after the operation.<br />
l{alntenance ¡l1.et.74 alÞhåfloc (M-7); Grower (0R); írheat (1,rt); Corn (C}; ltaintenance<br />
dlet , LL,fr alphafioc (¡{-i4).<br />
Grans per dalr, as is.<br />
1950<br />
l9-2? 23-29<br />
30-)3 ïr.-t+o<br />
c2<br />
c<br />
B<br />
B<br />
l',l<br />
f¡<br />
45-6t 62-65 66-'72<br />
GR M-7 GR<br />
GR yL-i GR<br />
GR M-7 GR<br />
çR TÍ-7 GR<br />
GR M.7 GR<br />
GR ¡,1-7 on<br />
2100<br />
¡,r-142<br />
M-1ä<br />
M-i4<br />
M-1¡l<br />
ill-11+<br />
rÍ-1[<br />
2100<br />
+.<br />
\l
ciíet seouence. The grower ration was fed for 4 davs<br />
betrveen the cereal anð./ or r,raintenanc e diet tesi periods.<br />
Collection crocedures: faeces were collected. for<br />
24 hours lram 2:00 P.i'i. on da}' 5 ro Z:OO p.Ì.. on day 6<br />
during each tes't period. -A. 2d-hour contÍnuous ileal_<br />
collection lvas carried ou-i, from 2:00 p,l,l. on day 6,uo<br />
2: OO P.ir.î. on day J. A plastic bag was tied to the ileal<br />
cannulae during colLection and its conlents were ernptied<br />
into a beakæ until a tot,al of dOO r,rJ_. was collec-r,ed..<br />
Àfter slirr:.ng a lO;o ariouor was texen oy aio o.f a<br />
J0 cc s¡'¡isge with a catheter tip. The reriainder was<br />
nade up to 400 m1 . again with clistilled water, reheated<br />
to pig body tenpçrature and j.nfused within half an hour<br />
into the caecai cannula by aici of a 50 cc syz,inge. The<br />
aiiquots taken for analyses were put into a container placed<br />
in ice. These containers were changed every eight hours after<br />
the start of the ileal collection. Therefore, for each pig<br />
J pooled B-hour col_lections were obtained.<br />
Calculatlons: âpparent avaiLabi.lities of the<br />
nutrients were determined b¡r aid of calculations based on the<br />
l-evels of chromic oxide in feecÌ, ileal digesta and faeces<br />
(Crarnpton and äarris, 1969). Ileal nut¡,ient availabilities<br />
'¡ere aLso de"'erÌnined by totai collection. True availabilities<br />
were deterr¡rined by correciÍng the apparent nutrient avair-abi-ritie s<br />
48
for the levels of endogenous nutrients, which were obtained<br />
by feeding the maintenance diets.<br />
Studv 2b.<br />
Six non-cannul-ated Ì,îana g ra barrows were subjected.<br />
to essentially the sane experimental conditi.ons as the<br />
cannulated pigs in study 2a. They ranged in weight from<br />
36 fo 4I kg. at the start of the experiment. The same<br />
test diets were used as for study 2â (Table 7).<br />
<strong>fn</strong> thís st,udy, Þl-14 was also fed pr:ior to the<br />
cereal test diet sequence. Three pigs were fed Ì.I-Z and<br />
3 pigs were fed Ì,1- ld during each period that the r¿aintenance<br />
diets were fed. Pigs receiving i-i- / during thre first test<br />
diet period v¡ould receive Ì'i-14 the following test period<br />
and vice versa, prior to and after the cereal test diet<br />
sequence.<br />
Study 3.<br />
the fate of caecally infused isolated soy<br />
protein and LTS was studied with 6 growing Ì:ianagra barror^rs.<br />
Caeca1 fistulae were fitted to 5 barrows weighing<br />
approxirnately 20 to 23 kE. and to one baruow that weighed.<br />
14 kg. VJith the exception of the surgury including the<br />
fitting of ileal cannulae, the procedure for insertion<br />
of caecal fistulae was similar to that cited under Slud.y<br />
2a (Easter and Tanksley, I9T3).<br />
l+9
The caecal fÍst,ula v¡as icienticaL in size and<br />
shape to the caecaL cannula used in sirud:¡ 2e viith .ûhe ex_<br />
ception that the barrel was 2 cn. J_onger (Fig. l). The<br />
fis-r,ula '¡as closed with a plug and firr:l¡. taped to the<br />
sl
TABLE 8. Fornul-ation of test diets in study 3.<br />
DIETS B+zISPI B+TSPI B+TSP+ITSI<br />
Ingredíents (l)<br />
Barley SL.7? 8b.72 ïb.Tz<br />
fsolated soy proteíE 6.2¿ - 3.39 3.39<br />
Supplemental Lysine¿ 0.00 0.00 0.20<br />
Cornstarch 3;00 6.39 6.39<br />
Soybean oil 2.O0 2.OO 2.OO<br />
Calciun carbonate L.25 L.Z5 L.2j<br />
Dicalciun phosphate O.75 O.75 O.Zj<br />
Chrooicoride + + +<br />
saltj o.5o o.5o 0.50<br />
Vitanin-mineral4 1:óo i.óo i:óo<br />
antibiotic prenix<br />
t t*rttt (Barley-plus 2 times 3.39 units of isolated soy<br />
protein); B+ISP (Barley plus 3.39 units of isolated.<br />
soy protein); B+ISP+LÏS (Barley plus 3.39 units of<br />
isolated soy protein plus supplemental lysine).<br />
2 tysine monohyd.rochlori.de.<br />
3 As ín Table ?<br />
4 Supplied-(ke_diet): viramin A 2200 Iü; !-iranin D 330 tU;<br />
ritan:in 81, 11.0 u.g; zinc lZ3 mgi neóadox 22 g.<br />
Âl
Êoth experinents w-ore set up as l,g)il iati.n Scuare<br />
deslgns. The test diets were fecì for I cia;,,s. Iqua1 anounts<br />
of f eed were off erecÌ I tines daily at ó : OO A.Ì.T. , 2: OO p.i"-1.<br />
and i0:00 F.i... ?he dail¡' aüounts of feed off ered were<br />
1800, 1950 and 2040 grans (on an as is basis) cìuring<br />
periods f, fI and lff respectivell". Äpnroximate daiì-i, i.n-<br />
takes per unit of metabclic body weight (r¡ì.,.,C'7 5 ) wer+ .t ?2o<br />
' r\ë. / rler " -/,r\..<br />
1370 and 1390 gra¡ns for periocis I, lT and I.II respectively.<br />
Ì¡fater r'ra s offereC freel¡,. just prior to and. after each feed.in6;.<br />
The barrows were fed a pig grower ration for 4 days between<br />
test periods (fable 7). The grower ration was fed at the<br />
sane l-evel of intake as the test diets duri-ng the following<br />
test period.<br />
Starting on da1' l of each test period at 6:00 A.j,..<br />
to day I at 2:00 P.l.;., ISP or LïS was infused I tirnes daily<br />
j.nto the caecum of the pigs. The daiì_y e_rount s of nitrogen<br />
from ISP and LYS that were infuseci into the caecuÍl of the<br />
pJ-gs are shown in îable 9 and Table 10 respectì.vely. The<br />
infusions were perfornied durin¿ the ti.r:e the pigs were<br />
eating. The test diets rvere usually consu¡,red within lO<br />
ininutes aiter they were offered.<br />
Startíng on day 5 of each test perioC a 3_daT<br />
nitrogen balance study wâs initiated. three consecutive<br />
Z4-hour coLlections of urine and faeces were car:.ied our<br />
beginning at 2:00 P.lr,. each colLection da¡¡.<br />
)¿
TABLE 9. The experimental- design and the daily intake of dry matter and orally<br />
and caecally supplied nitrogen in study Ja.<br />
PERTOD<br />
Pie IVo. I<br />
Dry matter intake (e)<br />
Nitrogen intake (g):<br />
0ra1ly<br />
Caecalllr<br />
Total<br />
!¡s-Ng--?<br />
Dr1' ¡¡"¡""r intake (e )<br />
Ilitrogen intake (e)î<br />
0rally<br />
Caecally<br />
TotaI<br />
Pie tJo. _1<br />
Dry matter intake (g)<br />
Nitrogen intake (g):<br />
0ra1ly<br />
Caecally<br />
Total<br />
(s+zrsP )l<br />
L687.50<br />
tÃ.95<br />
o.o0<br />
t+L.95<br />
(B+rsP )<br />
L6ór+.10<br />
3rÞ. 88<br />
0.00<br />
34.88<br />
(B+TSP+C-ISP )<br />
l-66À.10<br />
3tÞ.88<br />
9.57<br />
I+4.1+5<br />
Abbreviations in parentheses indi cate<br />
represents the treatment in which fSP<br />
IT<br />
(¡+rsp)x<br />
L802.78<br />
37.79<br />
0.00<br />
37.79<br />
(B+ISP+C-rSP )<br />
L8O2.78<br />
37.79<br />
LO.37<br />
,+8.16<br />
(B+2rSP)<br />
1828.13<br />
I+5 .l+5<br />
0.00<br />
l+5 .l+5<br />
TTT<br />
(n+tsp+c-rsp )x<br />
1885.98<br />
39.53<br />
10. 85<br />
50.38<br />
(B+2rSP)<br />
L9L2.5O<br />
47.5t+<br />
0.00<br />
Ir7 .51+<br />
(B+rsP )<br />
1885.98<br />
39.53<br />
0.00<br />
39.53<br />
the dietary treatments. B+ISP+C- fSP<br />
is infused into the caecur.
TABIE 10. The experimental design<br />
nitrogen and orally añd<br />
PERTOD<br />
Pig No. lr<br />
Dry matter intake (e)<br />
Itlitrogen intake (e ) -<br />
Lysine intake (s):<br />
0raLLy<br />
Ca e caIIy<br />
Total<br />
Pis*{o.5<br />
Dry matter intake (e)<br />
Itlitrogen intake (e)-<br />
Lysine intake (s)ì<br />
0rall_y<br />
Caecal_ly<br />
Total<br />
Pie No.* 62<br />
Dry matter intake (q)<br />
llltrogen intake (g )-<br />
Lysine intake (e )ì<br />
0ra1Ly<br />
Ca e cally<br />
TotaL<br />
and the daily lntake of dry<br />
caecally supplied 1ysine iir<br />
(B+rsp+c-¿ys )1<br />
1664.10<br />
3r1.88<br />
9.32<br />
3.L7<br />
L2,t9<br />
(B+rsP )<br />
1664. ro<br />
34.88<br />
9.32<br />
0.00<br />
9.32<br />
(n+tsp+tys )<br />
L675.O8<br />
35.0t+<br />
11.89<br />
0. oo<br />
11.89<br />
(s+rsp+Lys )l<br />
1815.45<br />
37.96<br />
t2.89<br />
o.o0<br />
t2.89<br />
(B+ISP+C-LYS )<br />
r_802.78<br />
37.79<br />
10.10<br />
3. tr3<br />
L3.53<br />
(B+rsP )<br />
L8O2.?8<br />
37.79<br />
10.t0<br />
0. o0<br />
10.10<br />
Abbreviations in oarentheses indicate the dietary treatments. B+rsp+c-Lïs represents<br />
the treatment <strong>fn</strong> which LIS is i;¡;;;ã into the caecum.<br />
Data from plg number 6 on treatment B+fSp+C-LyS çs¡¿ not available. \I<br />
ÏI<br />
matter and<br />
study lb.<br />
ITI<br />
(s+rsp )1<br />
r885.98<br />
39.53<br />
Lo'se<br />
0. o0<br />
r0.56<br />
(B+TSP+IYS )<br />
L899.2r+<br />
39.7r<br />
13. l}8<br />
0.00<br />
13 .48<br />
(B+rsP+c-tys )
Ðata from pig nuraber 6 for peri.od fII are not<br />
available (Îab1e 10). This pig was about g kg. lighter<br />
than the other pigs when surgery was perfornred and the<br />
first test period for this pig was not started. until<br />
the other pigs were on test period lff. lnadvertently,<br />
insufficient B+ISP diet was prepared to carry this pig<br />
through period fII.<br />
The amount of nitrogen fro¡n fSp to be infused<br />
was to be the difference between the nitrogen intake of<br />
the pig receiving the B+2r-Sp diet and the. pig receivj.ng<br />
the B+ISP diet during each test period. For exarnple, pig<br />
number 3 should have received 7.07l- grans of nitrogen per<br />
da¡r by caecal infusion (Table 9). However, 9.57 insteaC<br />
of 7.O7 grams of nitrogen from ISp was infused daiì_y into<br />
the caecum. This value was arrived at as follows: the<br />
difference bet̡een the E+2JSP and the E+ISp diet was 3.39<br />
grams of fSP per 100 grams of diet (Table g). For lgOO<br />
grams, the daily intake (as is basis) during period l, the<br />
difference would be equivalent to 6L.OZ2 grams of fSp.<br />
Eecause of calculation errors, the percentage of dry matter<br />
of the test diets was not taken into accoun!. Ten percent<br />
L+t.gs - 34.g8 = 7.07. zte * 3.jg = 6:.oz.<br />
6(
a1l-o1.¡enc3 v/es red= to eccount for l_csses Curi.n¿ i::íusion.<br />
lsolateC so¡' protein contalned l.l+.25,'/" ni.tro¿-:n, Jons=cuentl¡.,,<br />
the totel eflount of nitrogsn frcn fSp infuseC Caill, was<br />
9.57 gransl. ff the percenrege of drr¡ natter (95,C{") f.a¿<br />
keen conside:.eC and the allouance l:.aC not been naCe, the<br />
an':ount of infused nitrogen v;ould l:ave been .3. Op .nre:.=2 p.r<br />
Ca¡;. ,l- s ',,¡a s trentioned previo'-lsb', the diets l^;e::e pelleted<br />
in a comercial ty'pe pellet nill. Contanination frcn oihe¡diets,<br />
pt'3sent in the rixing anC or celleting s¡rsten, cculd<br />
ha¡.¡e taken place anci accounted for sone oÍ tLe remei-nCer cf<br />
the diff erence r^¡Ì:ich rvas I. 02 g""*=l of nitrogen.<br />
The difference betlveen LyS that was infuseC and that<br />
shculd hal'e been infuseC na1, be explained in the sene nanner<br />
es for ISP infusion (Tab1e I and l0).<br />
crr,^.,. /<br />
v ! qsJ.<br />
T.<br />
Thís stuC'.. r.ra s subCiviCed into st rldl.r l+e anci 4b.<br />
Study l,a Cealt v¡ith the deterninati.on of ileal end feecel ântno<br />
¿cid ar¡ailabilitiês fron v;heat and wheat Ce¡,ir¡ed fi.actions, in<br />
accltion to the ceterninaticn of netaboric iteal anc faecal<br />
anino acid levels . StuC:.' db v,ras carried ou.t t o iet:rnine the<br />
cifferences in ileal anc faecal a::inc acic avail;bilities f¡'o::<br />
!¿.t ¡c _ l1C _ LL.Zê Zz, nn __ % _. LL,el<br />
-....^lOc^1c0.-I.""-.1¡õ'.-f.¡-.<br />
]e (-.\-'; ,".' ,ì<br />
- l.\_t<br />
1 .\^<br />
^" - !.v2.<br />
cÁ
finely ground and cracked whole wheat<br />
St ud¡., l,a .<br />
i,,hole wheat was ¡ni1led to give JJ/, firo,tr,<br />
II .251" shorts end 2.5% niddlings. The bran, shorts<br />
v¡ere reco¡nbined in the sane proportion as theSr l¡s¡s<br />
nilling to give the E+S+l: diet.<br />
The i1eal and faecal amino acid, a,¿ailabili-ties .fron<br />
whole wheat, fiour and the E+S_., li diet were deternined with 6<br />
ì.anagra barrows that were fitted r,;ith ileocaecal re_entrant<br />
cannulae (Table 11 ). Three protein_free diets containing !, lO<br />
and L5f alphafloc respecti-ver-y were enplo,rzed to deternine the<br />
levels of metebolic ileal_ and faecal anino acids (Table Il).<br />
' Re-entrânt cannulae v"¡ere fitted to barolvs v;eighing<br />
37 to t*5 y". the pigs weighed from gl_ to.91 kg. at the end o.f<br />
the experir:ent.<br />
TLa j rrr, ¡(¿r.grcal -"-^.r procedure, type and. size o.f cannulee used,<br />
pre and post-operative care, housing, collection proce,lure and<br />
the duration and times the test ciets viere fed were si¡nila:. to<br />
those described under study 2a with one exception. Tleal digesta<br />
was collected continuously for only 16 hours, starting at 6:oo i..ì_.<br />
7 dal's after the pigs r¡e?e switched to their respective test<br />
diets. Faeces were collected for 24 hours prior to the start<br />
of the ileal_ col1e ction.<br />
AII diets v¡ere n:ade into pellets of 0.25 cn. dianeter.<br />
Iiho1e wheat lvas ground through a 2.CA rulr screen prior to<br />
)t<br />
]L.2511 bren,<br />
and niddlincs<br />
obtained bi.z
L<br />
2<br />
)<br />
TABIE 11. Formulatlon of diets for study l¡.<br />
DIETS<br />
LEVEI, OF ATPHAFI,OC (ø)<br />
Ingredients (%):<br />
tr{hole wheat<br />
Fl-our_<br />
B+S+Mt<br />
Cornstarch<br />
Alphafloc<br />
Sucros e<br />
Soybçan oil<br />
Salt¿<br />
Calclum carbonate<br />
DieaLciun phosphate<br />
Vitarnin-Êntf bi¿rrÍc<br />
PremixJ<br />
Chromic oxide<br />
Consists of Liy'o bran,<br />
As for Table 7<br />
As for TabLe ? .<br />
l¡fHOLE<br />
ÍìTHEAT<br />
97.OO<br />
o.5o<br />
L.25<br />
0,75<br />
o.50<br />
+<br />
96.00<br />
o.5o<br />
2.00<br />
1. O0<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
95.00<br />
o.50<br />
4.00<br />
0.00<br />
o.5o<br />
45Ø shorts and LV/" middlings.<br />
+<br />
63.00<br />
5. O0<br />
27.50<br />
1.00<br />
o.5o<br />
o'50<br />
2.00<br />
o'50<br />
+<br />
PROTEIN.FREE<br />
10<br />
63. O0<br />
10. o0<br />
22.5O<br />
r.00<br />
0.50<br />
o.5o<br />
2.00<br />
0.50<br />
+<br />
63.00<br />
1-5. OO<br />
L7.50<br />
t_.00<br />
o'50<br />
0.50<br />
2.00<br />
o.5o<br />
+<br />
ôo
pelleting. The E+S+l: diet v;as not ground prior to pelJ.eting.<br />
The experiri:ent wês set ì._tp in such e manner thet the<br />
effect of lever- of fiber on netabolic ileal and faecar anÍno<br />
acid le'¡els and the differences in avaiÌabilities cf amino<br />
acids f:.orn whole v¡heat, flour and the E+S+;:l diet could be<br />
anal¡rzed statisrical:-y by Z separate single cross_over designs.<br />
The periods during which the protein-free diets were fec were<br />
alternated with periods during v.'hich the wheet or u¡heat deriveci<br />
die'r"s were fed (Fie. 3 ).<br />
T\n¡o cannulated pigs (pig no, 6 and 9) were kept on<br />
standbSr and served as replacenent test animals in case coroplications<br />
arose r¡rith the pigs that r^¡ere actuall"rr te sted (Fig. 3 ¡ .<br />
Pigs nunber I, 2, tþ and Z did not consume i'ihe l5fr alphafloc<br />
protein-free diet nor the E+s+ir diets. pigs nu'ber 1 and 2 arso<br />
refused the 10,4 alphafloc protein-free diet. Replacenent pig<br />
number 6 consu¡ned both the 15f elphafl.c protein-free dict and<br />
the E+S+li diet. Replacernent pig number 9 did not consur:e the<br />
E+S+:i nor Lhe I5f" alphafloc protein_free diet (Fig. :).<br />
OnIy three observations (including Cata from pig<br />
nunber 6 ) were obtained fron diet E+S+?,i. The original E+S_!, I.t<br />
diet was diluted r"ith cornstarch so thêt cornstarch r::iade up 6a/"<br />
of ihe diluted E+s+i'{ diet. The cituted E+s+i,r diet (E+s+t.:_Ð) },as<br />
fed to the test aninals frorn da¡,, 6? to 7j (Fle. ¡ ).<br />
59
¡&lrn¡ ,. Eicpe¡tn.nt¡l d€lsn e¡it ¡llôl{abt€ itåtly rtt.tãr, tnrat. .fo¡ lt¡dy ¡,<br />
PIG ntlüBEN<br />
w-sz cR<br />
--r-- 2 PF-5 GR<br />
, tf-lo cn<br />
4 PF-IO GR<br />
5 PF-15 cR<br />
7 (r-$) oR<br />
6qnoh<br />
9Gncn<br />
ÂI¿OI.¡¡EI.E DI?TARI I'OO<br />
rNÎÂrE fsldâyl<br />
8-rr 12-ú<br />
FL G¡<br />
rL On<br />
E+S+¡! CB<br />
(B+s+¡tl oR<br />
Irf cR<br />
$¡f cn<br />
PF-15 CE<br />
PF-IO CR<br />
t500<br />
t9-22 2t-J9 to-tt<br />
(¡r-l¡t3 on<br />
{PF-151 Cn<br />
PF-5 Cn , Pr-5 Cn<br />
!F-LO<br />
!r-10<br />
0¡<br />
cB<br />
utl<br />
fl<br />
rL<br />
Ft<br />
B+S+¡t<br />
(B{€+u}<br />
B+S+¡t<br />
(B+s+r,t, Ct<br />
cR<br />
PF-lt<br />
pF-ró<br />
18oO tdoo<br />
: Pay 1 r€ th. el€verrh day &frer thê opèr¡¿roD.<br />
' i!i'åi3;liiï ih;lBi:?;Jrî¿ìj,";i:il"if;ï,*hqi."*:ål?fi,f î;l:l'"1ä"$:t;:"*,<br />
. frt3':'9i::l"i'f:19.äl¿,1ä'i-ÌtF),'+Íäf r*;lúSglåtÈi tiÈ:Sii."'¿r' ãåü"i.-i"i"iåiõ'r'r-¡r;<br />
3 ¡tet¡ tn pareDrh€36s lniHcâi. Dtsstng ob!..yario¡!.<br />
4 ltl6råbt. rt.l¡t iltêrary rntetr€ (g), !! r! bâËr!.<br />
3þ[o ' r]t-¡!<br />
cn<br />
OR<br />
GN<br />
G¡<br />
OR<br />
cn<br />
CR<br />
G¡<br />
5?-55 56-62 6r-66 67-73<br />
tFI:Ì3Ì 3l tBrgttrl<br />
PF_l' (pF-rr) c8 }'<br />
c& Ír<br />
PF-5 CB<br />
w-, c¡ 'L FL<br />
r9$-,rr 3i þ#:i3,<br />
2IO0 2tOO<br />
c¡<br />
c¡<br />
OR<br />
ct<br />
CR<br />
GN<br />
0n<br />
GA<br />
A+S+¡l-D<br />
E+A+¡{-¡)<br />
E+g+I'l-D<br />
E+S+¡t-D<br />
E+S+¡t-D<br />
E+S+¡t-D<br />
o¡<br />
6n<br />
2too<br />
71-7? 7ô-81<br />
GB ¡T-G<br />
GR ltfi-ci<br />
q¡ ll¡-c<br />
ct ttf-oi<br />
cn Íf-c<br />
OR TI-O<br />
GR lla-cn<br />
cn w-cn<br />
2À00<br />
o\
Studv Lb.<br />
Fine15' ground wheat was prepared by grinding the<br />
whole wheat three times through a hanner mill wiih a 1.5 nm<br />
screen. The cracked wheat was prepared b¡r grinding whcle<br />
wheat two times through a 6 mm screen. Eoth diets were<br />
made into pellets of 0.5 cn dia¡neter.<br />
Four pigs were assigned at randcm to each<br />
2 whole wheat diets (nig. 3¡. ?he whole wheat used<br />
stud_rr was of the sa¡ne source as that used in studv<br />
Analytical procedures<br />
t^<br />
of<br />
i-<br />
the<br />
thi s<br />
The test dÍets and faeces were dried in a forced_<br />
draft oven at 60-7a"c. rleal digesta viere freeze-driec. prior<br />
to analr,'ses, the sanples rdere ground throu.gh a I r:n nesh screen<br />
in a Il'iley nill .<br />
Anal1'sg5 for ash, crude fiber¡ drir 6¿1¡"r, ether<br />
extract and nitrogen Ìlrere car.rieC cut according to A.0,.Á..C.<br />
(197L) methods. Acid and neut ral-cetergent fíber rr,ere d.eter-<br />
nined according to the nethod outlined in Agriculture lÌandbook<br />
no. 379 (1970).<br />
Total starch was detennined accord.ing to the nethod<br />
of R. A. Ì'lacGregor (19?6, unpublished). ThÍs nethod involves<br />
dispersion of the ground sample, autoclaving, follovred bj¡<br />
digestion with glucoaml¡Iase. îhe totâl glucose reLeased l.ra s<br />
neasured using a Glucostat reeqent kit (glucose oxidase rnethod)<br />
61
on a autoan a:-:Ìzer.<br />
The level-s of chroaic oxide in feed, digesta and<br />
faeces were deternined according to the atonic âbsorption<br />
spectrophotonetry nethod of l.ii11ia¡ns et al . (1962).<br />
Arnino acid analyses were caruied out according to<br />
the method of Eragg et aI . (1966) with nodifications as<br />
cescribec by Giovannetti et al. (r9/o). r'rethionine, cïS and<br />
ÐAPA (o(-e- diaminopinelic acid) v,,ere determined accordíng to<br />
the rnethod of Hirs (1967). Tryptophen analJ¡ses were carried<br />
out eccording to the method of Hugli and lïoore (1972). The<br />
sar:rple s were analyzed on a nodel Il6-Eecknan amino aciC<br />
âna1-r'29¡.<br />
o¿
?-:SÌ-ILTS<br />
Stud" t_<br />
Ì.ith the e>:ce¡ticn oi CLU ¿nC ?.ç,C f¡.or.r lov¡ crotein<br />
l^rheat. br':n frcn high anC icv; prcte in r.;he¿t ccntaine,C hlshe¡.<br />
l:r-cl c l':l ^f .r't ^¡iro aclCs than ?nCcs¡+-- f¡¡n t-,j r_1. ¡¡d<br />
L_-=lr ::I:,.it Ðrr- u:: 1.-:j:.:. ¿::l-l<br />
lor.r¡ prctein r^rhe at (T:bl-e 12 ) , The hirh_.r 1e-..els (í.) of<br />
a:i::c eciCs ir: 'lra:: the:: in enccs:::r: '¡;e :: :z:.ti culirl,,<br />
;ïiì1nt for .¡.-.-C, ]-YS ;:rd ll-lì (esse rtiel aninc :cids ) ani fc-r<br />
¡.:.1 . iSP .nrt îif (non-essentief a::ino aciCs ). îhese d:ta<br />
-r^:=r'a al-sc r:fl:ct-ed bv th+ hi;h=r ccncentj,etion (as qt"aas peÌ,<br />
15 g::ns of nitrogen) of these a.nino acids 1n bran than in<br />
endosperr. prot;in. lhe concenti.:tions (g/tí¿ Il) ci al-I<br />
other anino aciis in prctein íro¡:i bran r^¡ere iol^;er thån ti:cse<br />
in prci:in cí er:Ccspern f:c:. bc,i. hÍ-;Ì^. :ri lc,,v :rccein rdh3:t .<br />
The ciiÍierences in aninc eci-rÌ concenireiian (gii5g l: ) r,¡ere<br />
i:c:'e r,:arirei Íor bran and enCcsperr derived íi-cn Io,¡; Frotein<br />
r¡rhee*" than for br.an and endcspern ,ler.ir.-eC frcn high prcteln<br />
';jith ti:e e:
TÂBl,ß 12. fhe ânlno acld ãnd nltrogen conteît of high and low p¡oteln<br />
wheat and their frections.<br />
CEREÂL COMPONENT<br />
IIMINO.ÀCIIN<br />
4ES<br />
TùIIO¿E WHEAÎ<br />
s/røgtz /"<br />
ITCH PROÎETN }r¡HEÁT<br />
e/L6eN<br />
o.?t+ r'.95 1.14 ¡*,9ó 22.7 0.65 3.dl<br />
Il4<br />
!-r!<br />
¡4S rysr<br />
ïiË<br />
lmr"<br />
vÂL<br />
9.i2 o.i6<br />
L.e-? o.Ej i:Bi l?.i o.ti l'.tt<br />
L.24 q.99 2.9e- 9.6e ã.gi r6:i ó:iir i:í6<br />
o.le 2.ll ).li 6.í,tr ið:i L.23 i.àt<br />
o.32 1.77 S.5l z.ji<br />
9.1t l:19 âl:ã<br />
li.j o.t:6<br />
o'.á9 i.lî<br />
l'.iõ<br />
Ë:Êi 0.7r 2:ii i:ii ,:Ut Is:t s:ti z:i8<br />
3.t9 o.s[ [:ói 19:t o,ir L'.i6<br />
t9¡<br />
9I,I<br />
9_rg<br />
q.%<br />
6.tg t.9i t.iL i:7ä ã1.í ó:¿¿ i'.:sã<br />
o.77 3j.99 t,.?2 z.Q+ to.ói ie.í ¿,:ró ¡ðlíõ<br />
i.l-i -1.?i ãl:i o.it -<br />
!_ER<br />
<strong>fn</strong>o 2.Li tt.z.i L.a¿<br />
o.É5 a.t-t e:ti i6:ó z.lz :rà.ià<br />
,,.69 f.0¡ l:íá ið:i õ:s4 -î,.öã<br />
rYn o.t6 j.zo õ.6e ã:ttr f?:i o.si ):iã<br />
Non-Essentiel<br />
--ftr--_ o.6i t,5t+ o.97 t+.Lr+ zz.r+ o.óo 3.i2<br />
NtrRocEN .2.92 16,00 t,7i 16.0 19.0 z.?3 16.0<br />
_^ 't_<br />
Expressed ås percentâge of dry nletter. 2 Erçressed aê g¡arns per slxteen graû¡s<br />
:f li:rogen; ) Thê percenta8e of enlno acids f¡on whols wheat presènt Ln the b¡an<br />
l¡âct1on. * Deterninêd by acid hyd¡olysis.<br />
clLíe$ fi<br />
¿O¡'' PROÎEIN WI'EAT<br />
s/16eN /"<br />
9'!q l.U- o.?2 s.Ls :'r.L<br />
9.?? L.97 0.26 t.Bj 2l.z<br />
9.2! J.2? 0.40 z.8L 22.o<br />
i:ii i,s,â lgiï; iii Li:Z<br />
i:ji a.L1 i:i\ r+.zo o.i9 E:?ri 3.?I ,+.zo li.i<br />
zL.i<br />
i:F,s :i:m å;li ,l:'it iij<br />
L.27 LL.35 1.02 7.2t t¡.ò<br />
3:3t L:EZ 3:9å L:',t 21,Z<br />
L.79 16.00 2.25 16,0 2t+.5<br />
o.4r<br />
0.21 1.95<br />
o.37 3.t<br />
'.d1<br />
L<br />
0.80 7.r+ì+<br />
o,25 2.33<br />
0.21 L.95<br />
o.55 5.!2<br />
o.3z 2.9è<br />
0,[8 4.r+?<br />
O,r+I 3. dl<br />
0.56 5.2t<br />
3,78 35,L6<br />
o.tr7 4.3?<br />
L.32 r2.2ê<br />
o,52 [,8¡]<br />
o,32 2.98<br />
l.?2 16,0<br />
c¡.
TÂB¡E 13. The anino åcld and nltrogen co¡tent of htgh and lor¡ proteln bsrlêy<br />
ênd lrhelr f¡actl.ons,<br />
CEREÄL COMPO¡ÎENÎ WHOLE BÂRLEY<br />
fir e/:r6e'lr2 f"<br />
ÁI.,II¡]O ACIDS<br />
Essential<br />
IIIG¡I PROTETN BÀR¡SÍ<br />
BRAN<br />
s/t6g:ñ /)<br />
ENDOSPTRM<br />
fi elßen<br />
ARG<br />
HIS<br />
II,E<br />
IEI'<br />
tYs _<br />
MET¡}<br />
PHE<br />
TfIR<br />
VAL<br />
o.51<br />
0,20<br />
o.)9<br />
o,38<br />
o.t5<br />
o.20<br />
0.58<br />
0.40<br />
0.r8<br />
L.'<br />
L,7<br />
t,t+<br />
?.3<br />
3.t<br />
L,?<br />
5.r<br />
3.5<br />
5.7,<br />
0.67 5.L 26.9 O.t+s<br />
0.2ê 2.t 28,7 0.20 ".2 i.9<br />
o.,+5 3.,+ 23.7 O.39 3,7<br />
O.8r 6.2 2O,O O.8r[ ?.9<br />
o.5? 4.4 33.+ O.3z 3.O<br />
0.r3 1.0 L3,3 0.22 2.t<br />
o.54 4.1 r9.1 0,60 5.6<br />
0.44 t.L 22.6 0.37 J.5<br />
0.68 5.2 2'+.O 0,58 5.5<br />
Non-Essentlâ1<br />
--îfii-<br />
^sP 0LU<br />
GLY<br />
PRo<br />
sER<br />
TYR<br />
o. j2<br />
o.7z<br />
2.90<br />
0,50<br />
L,27<br />
O,53<br />
O.37<br />
t+.j<br />
6.3<br />
25.4<br />
t+.4<br />
11.1<br />
4.6<br />
3.2<br />
0.6¡, 4.9<br />
o.92 7.O<br />
2.34 A7,9<br />
0,62<br />
0.8,<br />
4.7<br />
6.5<br />
0.48 3.7<br />
o.27 2,L<br />
25.2<br />
26.2<br />
],6.5<br />
25.b<br />
L3,7<br />
18.6<br />
15.0<br />
0.r,6 t,.3<br />
0.66 6,2<br />
3.W 29.L<br />
0,46 t+.3<br />
L.33 L2.5<br />
0.5r À.8<br />
0.t8 3.6<br />
NITRoCETV 1,6? 16.0 2,@ 16.0 23.t' L?O 16.0<br />
I Expressed âs pelcentage of dry natter. 2 Expressed as grams pe¡ sixtoe¡ grå¡ns of<br />
nltrogen. 3 The porcentage of amlno acldÉ f¡on whole ba¡Ley presênt ln the bren<br />
fractLon, 4 Deternlned by acld hydrolyels.<br />
WHOI,E BARI,ET<br />
f" slL6èN<br />
0.36<br />
0,14<br />
4.2<br />
1.6<br />
o,?8<br />
0.62<br />
3.3<br />
2.3<br />
o.29<br />
0.15<br />
3,t+<br />
1,d<br />
0,À0 t+.?<br />
0.30<br />
0,r+1<br />
3,5<br />
4.9<br />
0,5t+<br />
0.22<br />
0.3ó<br />
o-6q<br />
o.5i<br />
O.ôs<br />
o.39<br />
0.i7<br />
0,5i<br />
o.42<br />
0,60<br />
L.9<br />
7.I<br />
L,87 22.O<br />
o.55<br />
o.81<br />
1.6¿<br />
o.82<br />
o.37<br />
o.2?<br />
9.6<br />
,+,4<br />
3.2<br />
o,i9<br />
O.39<br />
0,18<br />
L.36 16.0 1.66<br />
LOI{ PNOTEIN BÂRLEY<br />
BRÀN<br />
% s/r6ev 5)<br />
DNÐOSPER¡I<br />
,Å elr'cls<br />
5.2<br />
2,L<br />
2,5 6.3<br />
4.9<br />
o.9<br />
3,q<br />
3.6<br />
L,9<br />
3j.9 0.37<br />
35.5 o.rÀ ".6 í-z<br />
29.L 0,3ó 3.i<br />
23.7 0.6À -e<br />
39.? 0.2d ' i.4<br />
L3.6<br />
22,O<br />
0,L? 2.i<br />
0,l¡o 5.o<br />
27.9 0.28 r- s<br />
28.r o.¿r i.i<br />
29.6<br />
29.4<br />
I9,8<br />
29. t+<br />
ló.3<br />
23.8<br />
15. r<br />
0,37 t,.6<br />
0.55 ó.8<br />
L.92 23.8<br />
o.37 t+,6<br />
0,90 ta-2<br />
o35 r,,j<br />
0.26 3.4<br />
27.6 L,29 16. O<br />
5.3<br />
7,8<br />
15,8<br />
5.0<br />
5.?<br />
3.8<br />
L.7<br />
16. O<br />
o\
ALA, ASP and Gl,T were higher j.n bran than ín endosperm<br />
when these were expressed as grans per 16 grans of nj-trogen.<br />
The concentration (g/t6g tl) of the other anino acids,<br />
especially lEU, I'IET, PHE, GLU, PRO and TyR were lower in<br />
bran than in endosperm protein. Ðifferences in amino<br />
acid concentration (g/t6g Itr) v¡ere nore marked for bran<br />
and endosperra protein frorn low than fro¡n high protein<br />
barley.<br />
The rats did not consume the bran di.ets fronr<br />
barley in its complete form. The crumbles were broken up<br />
and sorted. <strong>fn</strong> addition, faeces frorn barley bran were of<br />
a very moist nature and became contarninated. vrith sorted.<br />
and spilled food. Due to these difficulties and the biased<br />
data that would be obtained, feeding bran from barlelT to<br />
the rats was discontinued. Therefbre, no amino acid<br />
availability estimates from barley bran are available.<br />
The average daily dry matter intake of the test<br />
diets b]. the rats are shown in Table l_4. . The wheat bran<br />
diet v¡as consumed to a slightly lesser extent than the<br />
whole wheat or endosperm diet.<br />
Apparent amino acid availabilities, nitrogen and<br />
dry matter digestibilities are given in Table 15. I,Ìean<br />
squares of the anal_yses of varíance are given in the appendix,<br />
Table L. lfith the exception of HIS,IEU, ALA, and G.LU, there<br />
Ìvere no significant differences in apparent avairabilities of<br />
66
TÀBL¡ t4. Ì:eans ênd ståndård devi¿tion of dâtly rirrr ¡-1to. ínteì
amino acids due to weight. For the amino acids mentioned<br />
apparent availabilities were only I Lo Zi| hi.gher for the<br />
heavier than for the lighter rats. Only one weight x test<br />
diet interactíon was found, namely for HIS. The ciry uatter<br />
digestibilitl¡ hras significanrly higher (by 0.9,í) for the<br />
lieavier than for the lighter rats.<br />
Nitrogen and dry matter digestibilities were<br />
significantly higher from wheat endosperm than from wheat<br />
bran (fable 15). Those of whole wheat were between those<br />
of endosperm and bran. Apparent amino acid availabilities<br />
fror: whole wheat and its derived fractions foLlowed the<br />
same pattern. However, the dífferences in percentage units<br />
even if significant were of a sma1l n:agnitude. L,vsine was<br />
always the least available aroino acid and ranged frorn Zg.9<br />
to 82.2i[ for the high protein wheat and. its fractions and<br />
from 71 .4 to 73.L for the 1ow protein wheat and its fractions.<br />
Threonine was always the second. least avaj.lable essential_<br />
amino acid. fsoleucine and 1..ßT were also of 1ow availability<br />
(ì-ess than 80?á ) for bran from the lovr proiein r,rrheal . For<br />
the non-essential amino acicìs, ALA and ASp were always ¿þs<br />
leãst available.<br />
Ðr¡r matter,digestibili.ty, apparent nitrogen<br />
digestibility and anrino acid availabilities were higher for<br />
endosperm of barley than of whole barley (Table 16). The<br />
apparent availabilitíes of lysine were very 1ow: they were<br />
oð
TABLE l-5.\ Meansl and standard error of the ¡nean of the apparent availabil-ities of<br />
anino acids f¡om wheat and its fractions.<br />
CEREAL<br />
COMPONENT<br />
AMINo ÂcrDs (ø)<br />
Essential- '<br />
_-Aa-G--<br />
HIS<br />
TT,E<br />
LEU<br />
LYS<br />
¡{ET3<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
ASP<br />
GI,U<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
wrrnocrrq (%)<br />
DRT MATTER(%)<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1ríH0LE<br />
TIIHEAT<br />
TIÏGH PROTETN hIHEAT<br />
BRAN<br />
91.28 92.4I'' gz.gl<br />
%.?+ 93.rAB gL.6A<br />
90.4+ 87.ocn gz.8l<br />
ez.?! se. s! sL.3A<br />
?8.98 ?6.98 Bà.2A<br />
91.04 86.58 9z.LA<br />
9,r..01 gr.79D g,.uA<br />
d6.dB û.5c à:9.i^<br />
90.4À 8z .ecD gz.?A<br />
85.2s 82.¡c B8.OA<br />
85 ôA 82.5ø' 8? .?A<br />
3å:3Ë 32..#<br />
9? JlB s5 . jD eB. oA<br />
92 .68 89 . rc gL. rrL<br />
"g'.t*<br />
ENDO-<br />
SPERM<br />
91.d4 8d.48 Ð.3A<br />
89.?R<br />
903c<br />
Means in the same row with the<br />
Standard error of the mean.<br />
Determined by acid hydrolysls.<br />
ú.zc gz.zÃ<br />
n¡F 9ò.rÂ<br />
bIHOI.E<br />
IVHEÀT<br />
87.8c<br />
90.8c<br />
85.308<br />
S9.lt:<br />
73 ,l+v<br />
87.98<br />
90.80<br />
81.9cD<br />
86.3D<br />
80.9c<br />
?9,tc<br />
95.?2<br />
8r+. 8\,,<br />
95.gcD<br />
89.Lc<br />
85.6c<br />
LOI^I PROTETN hIHEAT<br />
BRAN<br />
ENDO.<br />
SPERM<br />
87.8c 88.?c<br />
87.9D gL.gBc<br />
??.7F 88.rC<br />
83.0D er.d<br />
?1.4c0 zz.zc<br />
77.o8 8?.98<br />
84.gG gz.ic<br />
7t+.98 ú.?c<br />
80.78 8d.6c<br />
75.8D 8r.eC<br />
74.rDE 8o.5ec<br />
el.ol s6.52<br />
7?.LL 86.8u<br />
89.oG 96.88c<br />
¿2.& go.7c<br />
?6.LE 87.[B<br />
sà.,f 75.68 87. j8<br />
88.8D 69.0c 9[.oA<br />
-x 4_2<br />
o.49<br />
o.¿g<br />
o,62<br />
o.57<br />
1.02<br />
0.75<br />
0.40<br />
o.73<br />
0.53<br />
0.68<br />
0.83<br />
o.26<br />
o.55<br />
o.2g<br />
o.l*9<br />
o.59<br />
a.66<br />
o.2g<br />
same superscript do not differ slgnificantly (p(05)<br />
cr\<br />
\o
TABIE 1ó. Meansl and. standard error of the nean of the apparent avail-abilitfes of<br />
amino acids from whole barley and endosper¡n frórn barJ.ey.<br />
DTET<br />
CENEAL COMPONENT<br />
AMINO ACIDS (%)<br />
Essentiai<br />
.A.RG<br />
HIS<br />
ÏLE<br />
tEU<br />
LYS<br />
i'[ET3<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
ÄsP<br />
GLiJ<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NTTBOCE}I (/,)<br />
DRT MATTER (1Á)<br />
HTGH PROTEIN BANT,ET<br />
I{HOI,E<br />
BARI,EY<br />
82.38<br />
83.68<br />
?9.Û<br />
82.5D<br />
6?.7D<br />
dl.OcD<br />
86. oF<br />
?6.&<br />
s2. OE<br />
n.2E<br />
72.}Dr,<br />
89.88<br />
?6.ú<br />
90.5F<br />
82.88<br />
82.80<br />
Z9:4?'<br />
1 Means in the same roür vrith the same<br />
2 Standard error of the rnean.<br />
3 Determined by acid hydrolysis.<br />
ENDO-<br />
SPERM<br />
81. zE<br />
88. ÀD<br />
Ð.58<br />
8? 3c<br />
70.8cD<br />
82.8c<br />
89.38<br />
79.6D<br />
86.5D<br />
77 3Ð<br />
?5,6Ð<br />
%.5c<br />
år.41<br />
gtr'?'E<br />
8ó. oD<br />
84.5cD<br />
83.Iq<br />
93.24<br />
LOIIT PROTETN BARI,EY<br />
I/[IH0LE<br />
BARLEÏ<br />
?4.?9<br />
28. o!'<br />
?0.6G<br />
77 åE<br />
60.IE<br />
?L.58<br />
?8.6r<br />
Ø.$<br />
T.?î<br />
67. OF<br />
67.2F<br />
d,Ì. LG<br />
?o. o0<br />
83.6H<br />
7Iþ.2G<br />
?L.?F<br />
&3:Êi<br />
ENDO-<br />
SPERM<br />
81.d<br />
Ð.58<br />
79.6F<br />
ú.t+D<br />
68.2Ð<br />
?9']D<br />
ú.5H<br />
T.?E<br />
80.58<br />
7L,].E<br />
?L.58<br />
87.6F<br />
?h.gF<br />
89.0G<br />
- go.zF<br />
7e.ú<br />
76.tF<br />
9L.38<br />
si2<br />
o.b9<br />
0.48<br />
o.62<br />
o.57<br />
L.O2<br />
o.75<br />
0.t+0<br />
o.?3<br />
o,53<br />
0.68<br />
0.83<br />
o.26<br />
o.55<br />
o.29<br />
0.49<br />
0.59<br />
0.66<br />
o.2g<br />
superscript do not differ si.gnlficantfy (p
67.7 and' 6c.L',a ror the high and row protein barrey respecti-verl,<br />
Lysine avaílabiIi-i, ie s fron endospern viere slightf], hisher.<br />
Threonine was a1r,,ia,r' s t,he seconci l_easi availai:le essea-r,i¿l_<br />
ar;iino aci d. For the non-essential_ a¡iino acids, ÀSp, A.j.A<br />
and GLY were of low apparent availability.<br />
Appa:'ent amino acid availabilities of high and.<br />
lovi protein w-heat and barley are conpereci separateli, i¡1<br />
iable L7. Appareni availabilities of whole wheat are<br />
significantl]' higher than those of nhole barley. The<br />
avairabi-lities of a¡rino acids fron high protein wheåt were<br />
higher than those from low protein lvheat. The same<br />
relationship was found for high and low protein barley.<br />
The metabolic faecal anino acid excret,ion in_<br />
creased as the level of fÍber of the protein_free diets<br />
was increased from IO ú 2Ai¿ (fa¡te tg). Significant<br />
differences in amino acÍd excretions due to weight, in<br />
addition to a significant v;eight x test diet interaction<br />
for nitrogen were found (?ab]e 1ð; ippenciix, îable 2). For<br />
both protein-free dieis, the excretion o.f AF.G r"n'as si-gnificantl¡r<br />
higher for the heavier than for the liEhter rats. The<br />
exc¡etions of L-ri, ì.IT and i/AL v¡ere significantlj. hiËher<br />
for the lighter than for t,he heavier rats when these were<br />
fed the 1CÍ alphafloc protein-free ciiet. Leucine, i,ET, VAL,<br />
ALA and ASP excretions vJere significantly hlgher for the<br />
7L
TABLE 17. Means1 and standard error of the mean of apparent anlno acld avallabilities<br />
of high and low protein wheat and barl_ey. '<br />
CEREAL ORATN<br />
I,EVEL OF<br />
PNOTETN (ø)<br />
AMINo ACÏDS (/,)<br />
Ess entiaL<br />
--T1ã-<br />
HTS<br />
II,E<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS<br />
I{ET3<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
vAt<br />
Non-Essential<br />
-r,ã---<br />
ASP<br />
GI,1'<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NrTnocEN (ø)<br />
DRY },ÍATTER (ø)<br />
L<br />
2<br />
3<br />
r8.3<br />
gL.2B<br />
93,?A<br />
eo.4+<br />
92.7^<br />
?8.s8<br />
91. OA<br />
94.0}{<br />
86.88<br />
90. ¿A<br />
85.2P<br />
95.34<br />
9?.t+A<br />
89.88<br />
si.t!B<br />
92.6ts<br />
91.84<br />
89.?B<br />
go.3c<br />
II'THEAT<br />
LL.2<br />
s?.82<br />
90.8t,<br />
85.308<br />
89. r&B<br />
ß.4c<br />
33.38<br />
dl.9cD<br />
86.3D<br />
so. el<br />
79.L"<br />
o< .rB<br />
åt.93'<br />
á6'.ic<br />
85.6c<br />
84.4c<br />
88.80<br />
11.rr<br />
82.3P<br />
83.68<br />
79.OT<br />
82.5D<br />
6?.?D<br />
gt.ocD<br />
86. oF<br />
76.Ñ<br />
82.08<br />
t2'38,<br />
89.88<br />
76.oy<br />
90.51'<br />
82.8!;<br />
82.8D<br />
?8.7D<br />
$.?E<br />
Means in the same row with the same superscript do not<br />
Standard error of the mean.<br />
Determined by acld hydrolysis.<br />
BARI.EY<br />
8.1<br />
4tÅÏ<br />
?o.6G<br />
?7 3E<br />
60.18<br />
?L.5y<br />
?â.61<br />
6?.8F<br />
n.?F<br />
67.0I<br />
6?.2'<br />
8À. tc<br />
70. oq<br />
lt:2t<br />
?L.7r<br />
?2,8F<br />
83.58<br />
e-2<br />
"x<br />
0.49<br />
0.lrg<br />
o.62<br />
o.57<br />
1.02<br />
o.?5<br />
0.lrO<br />
o.73<br />
0.53<br />
0.68<br />
0.83<br />
o.26<br />
o.55<br />
o.2g<br />
0.49<br />
o.59<br />
o.66<br />
o.2g<br />
differ signifÍcantfy (P(0.05 ).<br />
.\)<br />
¡\)
TABLE r8. The effect of dietary fiber rever and weight of the rats on the<br />
metabolic faecal amino acid and nitrogen ãxcretionl .<br />
I,EVEL OT<br />
ALPHAFLOC<br />
vrEIcHT (g )<br />
AMINO ACTDS3<br />
Essentíal<br />
ARG<br />
HÏS<br />
TLE<br />
LEU<br />
LYS<br />
!ET4<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
v.dt<br />
Non- Es sent lal<br />
-Trã-<br />
ASP<br />
GI,U<br />
ctr<br />
PBO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NTÎROGEN<br />
(/")<br />
?L<br />
. ot6eP<br />
.00?r:<br />
.0214b<br />
.v6?9<br />
.o2gbtr<br />
.01049<br />
,o2cD:<br />
.o2792<br />
.0267v<br />
.822c^<br />
.o523y<br />
.0619P<br />
.0286b<br />
.o8r+P<br />
.02622<br />
.0180rr<br />
.263sAB<br />
t0<br />
207<br />
.01919<br />
.0078:<br />
.o1g4b<br />
. 03 28p<br />
.o2?trö<br />
. oo82!<br />
.0192:<br />
.o2l+?P<br />
.o236u<br />
.o2g2c<br />
.04789<br />
.0569P<br />
.0281ö<br />
.02298<br />
.0247:<br />
.0164rr<br />
.220L8<br />
I Means are.expressed as grams excreted per lOO grarns of dry matter intake of<br />
2<br />
3<br />
l+<br />
the proteln-free diets.<br />
Standard error of the mean.<br />
Means in the same row with the same superscript do not differ signlflcantly (p
lighter than for the heavier rats when these were fed the<br />
zOitr alphafLoc protein-free diets.<br />
The differences due to weight, al_though significant,<br />
were of smal1 magnitude. Liost variation was due to the<br />
Ieve1 of alphafloc in the protei_n-free d.iets as is shown<br />
by the large mean squares for test diets (Appendix, Table 2).<br />
The metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion increased<br />
as the level of alphafloc was raised. i{owever, there was no<br />
signíficant di.fference between the nitrogen excretion of the<br />
lighter rats fed the IAf, alphafloc protein-free diet and for<br />
the heavier and lighter rats fed Lhe 2O,4" alphafloc protein-<br />
free diet (Table 18). lt/ith the exception of conta¡nination<br />
from urinary nitrogen, no satisfactory explanation can be<br />
given for this observation.<br />
Stud-v 2.<br />
Study 2a.<br />
the nitrogen content decreased from wheat to barJ-ey<br />
to corn. The l-eve1s of crude and acid-detergent fiber were<br />
some!¡hat higher for corn that for wheat while the level_ of<br />
neutrar-detergent fiber was srightry lower. chemical analysis<br />
showed that approximately 7 O/" oî alphafloc is actualÌ), crude<br />
fiber (Tab]e 19).<br />
ìfith the exceptlon of LEU, LïS and t"ET tÌre 1eve1s<br />
of essential amino acids decreased from wheat to barley to
TABL'E 19. Proxinatçr -acid and neutral-detergent fiber, starch and chromic oxide<br />
analysesr-for diets in jiuãy z.<br />
DTETS<br />
LEVEL 0F ALPHArroc (ø)<br />
TTE¡4S (y'gT<br />
Nitrogen<br />
Ether extract<br />
Fiber<br />
Ash<br />
Crude<br />
Acid-detergent<br />
Neutral-detergent<br />
S tarch<br />
Chromic oxide<br />
2.22<br />
r.89<br />
5.37<br />
7.3U<br />
2L.47<br />
5.32<br />
64.3i<br />
o,L7<br />
1 Percent expressed on a dry weight basis.<br />
hIHEAT<br />
2.00 2.6L<br />
3,87 t.?o<br />
2.62 2.56<br />
3,95 3.57<br />
LL.73 t2.22<br />
I+.76 b.29<br />
72.1+O 66.65<br />
o.5z o.43<br />
MATNTENANCE<br />
7 Lt+<br />
o.66<br />
1.30<br />
L.95<br />
o.66<br />
L.L7<br />
9.62<br />
O.53 O.5t+<br />
{
corn. The level of LTS decreased frorn barley to wheat to<br />
corn. The levels of LEIJ and I,GT lrere highest in corn<br />
(Tab1e 20). The results obtained for TRy from duplicate<br />
analyses on diets and digesta varled extensi-ve1y. There_<br />
fore, TRT was not considered in these studies.<br />
The metabolic ilea1 and faecal amino acid levels<br />
were estj-rnated at 2 levels of dietary fiber by aid of the<br />
ii-7 and i'.i- 14 diets . These d.iets contained d;?o casein.<br />
Protein-free diets are usuarry emptoyed for the estination<br />
of rnetabolic Losses. i{owever, low dietarl, consumption<br />
caused b¡r palatability problerns with pigs fed protein_free<br />
diets is often a major problem. It was not *,,hought advisable<br />
to subject the cannul-ated pigs to this extra stress. Oon_<br />
sequently, a highly digestible protein at a low level_<br />
(4Ø casein) was included in the protein-free diets. These<br />
di.ets were named maintenance diets. ft v,ra s assumed at this<br />
time that all anrino acid.s from casein woulC be absorbed b],<br />
the end of the smal1 intestine and that'the ireal and faecar<br />
Ievels found by feedlng the maintenance diets lr.oul_d be<br />
representative of the netabolic levels.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> order to avoid. complications due to blockage<br />
(which could have resulted in permanent problerns), the ÌL_ld<br />
diet was not fed prior to the cereal test. diet seouence<br />
but only near the end of the conplete experiment (Fig. 2).<br />
/o
TABIE 20. Anino acid composition of diets for study 2.<br />
DIETS<br />
AMINO ACTDS<br />
Essential<br />
--Tr-d-_<br />
HIS<br />
ïtE<br />
LEU<br />
TTS<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
lHR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-E<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
l+<br />
ASP<br />
cYs<br />
GLU<br />
GLT<br />
Pn0<br />
SER<br />
TTR<br />
BARI,EY<br />
v,t e/r6sr.? %<br />
o.57 4.10 0.¿+5<br />
o.23 L.66 0.25<br />
o.39 2.81 AJ5<br />
0.86 6.r9 1.31<br />
o.t+z 3.O2 O.3t*<br />
0. r93 L.37 o.253<br />
0. ó0 t+.32 O . 52<br />
o.3e 2.7t+ 0.36<br />
a.5b 3.89 0.t+6<br />
o.¿g<br />
0.69_<br />
o.22t<br />
2.93<br />
0.49<br />
I.22<br />
o.5o<br />
0.36<br />
g/r6sN<br />
Percent expressed on a dry natter basis.<br />
urams per slxteen grams of nitrogen.<br />
Deterrnined by the oxidation nethod.<br />
Deternined by acid hydrolysis.<br />
I',HEAT<br />
3.6L<br />
2. Ol<br />
2.81<br />
10.5t<br />
2.73<br />
2.00<br />
\.L7<br />
2.89<br />
3.69<br />
3.t+6 o.za 6.10 O.49<br />
4.97 0.72^ 5.77 0.68^<br />
r.59 0.20J 1.60 o-2dJ<br />
21.10 2.Og 16.76 \..44<br />
3.53 0.40<br />
8.78<br />
3.2L O.57<br />
0.8À 6.71+ L.t+5<br />
3.60 0.¡r<br />
2.59<br />
à.09 0.63<br />
0.40 3.2I 0.r+1<br />
e/r6eu<br />
M-7<br />
0.58 3.56 o.12<br />
o.29 L.?8 0.10<br />
0. r+t+ 2.7o 0.19<br />
o.97 5.95 0.38<br />
oJa 2.2L 0.30<br />
o.243 L.L? 0.104<br />
o .67 l+. 11 0. 21<br />
o.39 2.39 0.l_6<br />
o.55 3.37 0.2b<br />
3 .00<br />
l+.L7<br />
L.72<br />
27.23<br />
3.50<br />
8.89<br />
3.86<br />
2.5L<br />
g/rógN<br />
2.95<br />
2.t+6<br />
L.67<br />
9.3t+<br />
7.37<br />
2.42<br />
5.L6<br />
3.93<br />
5.90<br />
o. 13 3 .20<br />
o.3z 7.86<br />
o.92 22.6L<br />
0.09 2.2L<br />
o.39 9.59<br />
o.3O 1t.92<br />
0.17 4.18<br />
o.L2<br />
0.10<br />
0.20<br />
0.39<br />
0.29<br />
0.104<br />
0.20<br />
0.16<br />
o.2t+<br />
M-14<br />
g/r69N<br />
2.95<br />
2,1+6<br />
l+.92<br />
9.59<br />
7.L3<br />
2'ltz<br />
I+.92<br />
3.93<br />
5.90<br />
0.1'+ 3.4t+<br />
o.33 8.11<br />
o.9r 22.37<br />
0.09 2.2t<br />
o.l,.o 9.83<br />
0.19 t+.67<br />
o.L7 t_8<br />
'+.
Three sepa:.a-t,e consecutive 8-hour 1lea1 collections<br />
v¡ere carried out. îhe sailples vrere frozen anC s.to:.ed.<br />
Accident.! ],, several il-eal anci faecal coll_ectíons were re_<br />
n:oved from the fr.eezer. anci v¡er.e spoiled. The iteal semples<br />
lhat were spoiled were the firs-r, and thj-rd 6-hour collections<br />
frorc pig number 1 fed rvheai: and the second and third iieal<br />
colleciions fron pig nunber 6 fed wheat. in additj-on, all<br />
ileal and faecal- saraples from the second tine the i'.-Z<br />
diet r,'ra s fed were spoiled.<br />
The amino acid end chromic oxide composition of<br />
every 8-hour i1eal coliection of pig number Z, 7, 3 ana 4<br />
t¿hen fed wheât are contpared in ïable 2I . There r,,ere only<br />
snaLL differences between the ind.i.¡idual ô-hour collections<br />
for each pig. This finding u,as no! unexpected since t,he<br />
aní¡¡als v¡ere fed j tines daily, the sarne aaount at each<br />
feeding and exactl)¡ 6 hours apert. Uncier the experiinen-r,ai<br />
conditions cami"ed out, the data show that the anino acid<br />
and chrorcic oxide content from i1eal digesta froil lvheat<br />
obtained during each singì-e 8-hour corlection is representa-<br />
tive of that obtained during a conplet,e 2i+-hour lleal<br />
collection.<br />
the apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />
avail-abili|ies of the cereal grains ai,e shown in Table 22.<br />
The i1eal a¡¿ino acid availabilities were obtained fronr<br />
lö
TABLE 21, Comoarisonsl ôf the indlvlduaL etght_hour lleal collections fron wheat<br />
fo¡:' study 2å.<br />
NU¡IIBF.R OF PIG<br />
TII,ÍE OF<br />
COLLECTION¿<br />
¡{rNo AcrDs (ø )3<br />
Essentlal<br />
_rF-6-<br />
HIS<br />
ILE<br />
LEU<br />
LYS<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essentlal<br />
ÄLÀ<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
lTR<br />
cHRoMlc oxrDE(ø)<br />
I<br />
3<br />
o.34 0.34<br />
0.t6 0.r8<br />
0.26 0.26<br />
o.49 0.t+9<br />
O.3t+ O.)4<br />
0.I r o.31<br />
0.36 O.J5<br />
0.40 0.40<br />
o,43 O.t+2<br />
0-63 0.62<br />
I.22 1.20<br />
o.53 0.5r<br />
0.64 0.6r.<br />
0.36 O,35<br />
o.77 0.I9<br />
r.66 L.39<br />
9,22 9.32 o.3? o.22 g.?7 o.27. o.2? o.32 o.2g o.33<br />
9.\7 o.L7 0.18 0.16 o.ià ó:i6 õ:ii o.rô 0.1À o-17<br />
9.29 0.r0 o.ze o.2? g.ii o.aá ó'.àä -o'.âë, o:ài ó:äâ<br />
9.*? 9-5t o.53 o.iî_ 9.i+ ó:r-4<br />
9.2) 0.39 0.38 o]? õ:ü o.trs ó:4ö õ:;;<br />
9.àç o.äg ó-.äá o.ii o.iÍ ó.1;<br />
o.3i 9.21 0.3e 9.36 o]i<br />
o.Lr<br />
o.3\<br />
o-r2<br />
g.ie ó.ãí ó:ãí õ'.'2â ó:ii ó:iL<br />
o.je o.\j o.4r o.t2 9.3? o.it<br />
o.jä<br />
o:ü<br />
o:i3 oll ó:tt ó.3î<br />
ó:ii, o.tz õ'.ii ó:ii<br />
9.+2 o.rL 0.5r o.5? g.2t g)7 o.3? o.43 o.br+ o.L¿<br />
9.q? 0.Bo 0.76 o.i7 9.t\ 9:t, ó.ii o.ò:z ó'.ð; o:äi<br />
l.?o r.to r.Lo r]j 9.?1 Þ.çe ó:'si) L.z2 t.zi i-.ái<br />
9.i.1 0.90 0.?3 0.i\ 9.í,4 o.+i ó'.ä o.id 0-.16 õ:i6<br />
9.92 9.65 0.63 o.5q 9.1i o:¿é ó:ií o.Èà o.iÇ -o.íé,<br />
9.25. 0.&,+<br />
0.18 o.zl<br />
o.Lt 0.43.<br />
o.2o o.rs S.iZ o.iz Q:2t o.1i<br />
ó:iâ<br />
ö:íi<br />
o.tt, o.5s õ:;;<br />
o.i¿ ó:íí ó:í6<br />
L.69 r.29 1,39 r.31 r.7g 1.6¡* r.62 r.6t+ 1.5r t.56<br />
Conparlsons for DIE nulnbel^ l and_ó coutd noù be made<br />
the first 8-hour- (õ-B) €incê only the second (S_ló)<br />
rrear and<br />
ãoirèciion" iãJpããtiiäiy'v.,ere avalrabLe.<br />
Tlne lnterval åfter the stârt of the collectlon.<br />
Percent expressed on a dry natter baBis.
TABLE 22. Apparent iLeal and<br />
ín study 2a.<br />
CEREAI GRATN<br />
LOCATTON<br />
AMINO AcrDS (ø)4<br />
Ess ential<br />
--r.m-<br />
HTS<br />
ILE<br />
LEU<br />
tYS<br />
¡,ßT5<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
toq-Essential_<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
crs5<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
lYR<br />
NITNOGEN (ø)<br />
DRY MATTER (ø)<br />
1<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
ÏIEUM<br />
87.bc<br />
8d.3D<br />
8?.sA<br />
s2.5+<br />
82. oA<br />
91.94<br />
90.548<br />
78.98<br />
84.98<br />
CORN<br />
FAECES<br />
92.24<br />
93.648<br />
88. ra<br />
e3. s4<br />
83. OA<br />
89.54<br />
9L'?A<br />
8634<br />
88.24<br />
88.54 90.84<br />
å?:ii' 33'2i"<br />
9l-.8c 94.18<br />
7L.zc g6.zÃ<br />
80.r+c %.LA,<br />
84.98 9r.oA<br />
89.04 go.2A<br />
82.4n d9.48<br />
80. zB 89.ÀA<br />
faecal amlno acid availabilitiesl of the cereal gralns<br />
I\IHEAT<br />
ILEUM3 FAECES<br />
85.8c gz.7^<br />
89.rcÐ 9L.gA<br />
8:-.lB 89.t4<br />
ir?E 3å ?f<br />
d6,64 BB.9A<br />
88.BBc gz.5Ã<br />
?6.5c 86.?A<br />
82.84 88.94<br />
?t+.02<br />
z7'.r^<br />
92.?BC<br />
n.7c<br />
86-88<br />
8ll. rB<br />
85.98<br />
82.9D<br />
nlc<br />
8r,. oB<br />
ai. rB<br />
%.74<br />
9?.oÃ<br />
89.34<br />
96.74<br />
92.54'<br />
89.54<br />
9L.24<br />
89. OA<br />
BARLET<br />
ÏI,EUM FAECES<br />
8L.5D 89.IrB<br />
80.¿E 91.98c<br />
?s.{ 83.18<br />
sl.51 s6.6:<br />
73.3" 77.5"<br />
80.lB 79.98<br />
82.2D 87.9C<br />
?t.zD dr.4B<br />
78. oc 8rÞ.38<br />
69.78<br />
zr.zD<br />
7?.68<br />
86.6D<br />
?L.2D<br />
go.9c<br />
76Jc<br />
79.?c<br />
?t+.98<br />
66.2D<br />
?7.t*<br />
l":?i"<br />
92.?BC<br />
82.68<br />
92 j.A<br />
86.98<br />
85. oB<br />
85,9c<br />
83. óB<br />
Each vaLue Ís the rnean of 6 observations. 2 standard error of the rnean.<br />
rreal availabilities from pig numb er 1 and 6 were based on singl-e d-hour coLLections.<br />
Means in the same row with the sarne superscrlpt do not differ slgnlfícantly (F
pooling of the 3 individual 8-hour collecti_ons that were<br />
derived fro¡n each of the cereal grains. However, apparent<br />
ileal anino acid availabilities from pig nu¡nber I and. ó<br />
were based on one single 8-hour collection. Both ileal and<br />
faecal amino acid availabilities r¡ere deterrnined by the<br />
chromic oxide nrethod (ùrampton and Harris, L96gl . For tl¡e<br />
cÌeterminat j.on of Ì:äT and CYS availabilities, faeces froil<br />
the 2 pigs, fed the s arne diet during each particular test<br />
perioci , were pooled anci analyzed (FiS . ,2 ) . The inciivi.cÌual<br />
apparent ileal and faecal emino acid availabilities and<br />
analyses of variance ere shov¡n in the appendix (Table 3, 4,<br />
5, 61 7 and 8)<br />
There were no significant differences between<br />
the apparent faecal availabilities of essential amino acids<br />
from wheat and corn (ta¡Ie eZ). The avaÍlabilities of<br />
essential anino acids from wheat and corn were signifi.cantly<br />
higher than those from barley. The differences in iTS<br />
availabilities were of a sna1l magnitude. They were 8J.0,<br />
80.7 and 77.5% f$ corn, wheat and barley respectively.<br />
the apparent faecal availabilities of the non-<br />
essentj.al amino acids from wheat and corn were higher than<br />
those from barley. îhe availabilities of .A,l,A and ASp frorrr<br />
corn were significantly higher than those from wheat. There<br />
were no significant differences between the apparent pRO<br />
availabilities of the cereal grains tested.<br />
81
Cenerail¡2, the ir eaJ_ evaila.oiiities cî aihj.nc aciis<br />
decreasecì irc: corn l,o r,vheat tc Larl=¡.. :he :,;S ai-?:la:.ilit.,<br />
1n par.ticul ar, iecreased frcrn 52.C tc ì5,7 io lj )),: îor<br />
corn, wheat anci barJ_e1' respectil'e1:¡.<br />
F¡ecai a...aile'cilii_i.es lr'ere hlgher t,han ileel<br />
aveilabillties for alI anino ecids ícr e¿ch cf -,,he ce:.eal<br />
grains tesied. îhe di.fferences were largest for .,1ìG, iils, :i_iì,<br />
'-:LY , ln l.) and S-1,. ïn nost cases, there r¡as l-ess difference<br />
between ileai anci faecai anino acid availebilities frcni corn<br />
than fron r^heet end barley. For instance, the di_fference<br />
fcr LYS was 1í for corn anci 5 and tr.2í,, f or wheet end berie¡,<br />
respectivel;'. ihe ciifference fcr ?ijR was 7,L, LC.2 ana<br />
10. 2Íi for corn, wheat and 'oarì-ey resçeciive11,.<br />
Threcnine rvas the Ieast avail_able essential anino<br />
aciC for corn anci barley lr,hen deternineC at the end c.f the<br />
ileun. L:-'sine wes the lease available aninc acic fron corn<br />
ânC 'oa.rie1' when dete:.nined by the faecai enalr,sis nethci.<br />
i¡rsine rvas the I east available a¡:.ino aciC frc: uhe at<br />
regardiess oÍ lleal or íaecel cciiection (?abie 22).<br />
Si¿:ni_f icant pig e ífect s were obserl-eci ic:: so:e enino<br />
aciis (LppenCi.x, îa'cle 6 znd. 7 ) . lhe appe:.ent aninc acid<br />
availabilities .íron pig nu:::'cer i (replacer:eni pig ) ,¡ere<br />
generaì-l¡,' lolver than thcse of the cther pigs, in par-ticr-tlar,<br />
when Ceternined at the eni cí the ileu:n. The latter resul_ted<br />
82
also in several significant pig x location interactions.<br />
Ðry natter digestibilities based on total ileal<br />
dry matter collectÍon and chromj.c oxide levels r4¡ere nearly<br />
the same for the cereal grains (Table 23). <strong>fn</strong>dividual<br />
compari-sons are shown in the appendix (Tab1e 3, t+ and 5).<br />
Dry r,ratter digestibilities determined by chromic oxide<br />
level-s were lower for Ii-7 and I,l- 14 than when deterrnined by<br />
total ileaI drl' rnatter excretion. Data obtained from l,ì_Z<br />
represent those fron the first Z\-hour ileal colrect,ion<br />
that r,¡as cåried out. Lack of experience with regard to<br />
the collection p'ocedure resuried in unforeseen r.osses of<br />
ileal digesta at that time. Elockage and associated problems<br />
occurred someti¡les when the pigs were fed the Ii_Z diets<br />
but very often when they were fed the ¡.!-14 diets. For the<br />
[î-14 diet, feed. intake r^¡as very irregular and. meals were<br />
often skipped. some pigs started nibbring instead of con-<br />
suming the nreals within a short time after feeding. The<br />
average daíIy dry matter intakes by the pigs fed jri_ 7 and<br />
l'Í-14 were 1486 (B?.8j1 of allowable intake) and 9i5 grar¿s<br />
(trt.91t" of alLowable intake) respectively (Appendix, Table<br />
9 and 10). The cereal test diets in these studies were<br />
alwa1.s consumed within t hour after feeding (ie . IOU/" of<br />
allowable intake ) and the anount of ileal dry natter<br />
collected during 3 consecutive g_hour coll_ections coulci oe<br />
83
TABLE 23. Conparison of ileal_ dry natter d.igestibilitiesl<br />
based on total dry natter excretiõn and chronic<br />
oride levels.<br />
Measurenent Total Chro¡dc<br />
' Oxide<br />
DIETS<br />
Barley (6)z<br />
corn (6)<br />
Wheat (t¡)<br />
NIaínbenance, flo<br />
alphafloc (5)<br />
Maintenanee, 14f<br />
alphafloc (6)<br />
6?.LL!2.87<br />
80. 0612 . L6<br />
n.Ltto.?7<br />
88.52t2.54<br />
èt+.StS.Zz<br />
Mean and standard devi.ation.<br />
66.L?b.86<br />
80.18t0.7?<br />
73.25t2.O5<br />
86.55te.49<br />
76.$tO ?,t+<br />
values in parentheses i.ndieate the nunber of observatioos.<br />
84
e'l ateci back to i,he total dr¡,, natter intake from l feedin3s.<br />
fleai d:';,r metteÌ' digestibili!1es based on -i,otal ileal cli,1.<br />
niatter r¡.,ere calculated on the basis of the lâtt,er prj-nciple.<br />
Îhe higher i1eal dry Ììietier d.ige stib ilit ie s obteined frorr<br />
l.--7 and Ì.-1d by totaL iLeal dry n:at.r,er levels than b;r<br />
ch:'o¡ric oxide level_s in pârt reflect the l_ov,,er in-uake oÍ<br />
these diets bi' the pigs in compårison to their allowable<br />
dail"v dry nat ter intake .<br />
ïhe average n:etabclic ileal and íaecal anino acid<br />
and nitrogen lerels, expressecÌ as grat:s per lOO grams of ciry<br />
r'Ër-ter intake, ai'e shown in Table 24, The individual rcetabolic<br />
ileal and faecal anino acj-cì l_eveìs of the pigs are shown in<br />
the appendix (Table 9 and IO). AII j-leal anC faecal collections<br />
from pigs feci iì:e i",-7 diet follouin¿ the cereal test ciiet<br />
sequence lrere spoiJ_ed. pig nunber ó, fed i:_7 prior to the<br />
cereal test di.e t sequence, went off feed the Cay before the<br />
ileal collection was carried out.<br />
I'lot taklng into account the possible eflect oi bcd;.<br />
weight on metabolic and faecal arnino aciii levels, these<br />
leve1s lvere increased as the level of alphafloc lr,a s raised<br />
from 7 to IU,/h (fa¡le e4). For both the i;_Z and i,i_14 diets,<br />
there was a net l-oss (as gr.ans per 100 gran:s of dry nnatter<br />
intake ) of total nitrogen betueen the end of the ileum and<br />
the anus. there was a net disappearence of ARG, G.l,U, GLï,
TABLE 24. Metabolic ileal and faecal amino acid l-evelsl fron study 2a.<br />
PERTOD OF<br />
COLIfiCTION<br />
LEVEL OF<br />
ATPHAFTOC (%)<br />
tocATr0N<br />
AMTNO ACTDS<br />
EssentLal<br />
ARG<br />
HTS<br />
ÏLE<br />
LEU<br />
ï,ïs<br />
¡{ET5<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
vÂt<br />
Non-Ess entia].<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TTR<br />
NÏTROGEN<br />
L<br />
2<br />
3<br />
l+<br />
5<br />
BEFORE CEREAT DTETS2<br />
rtEUM (5)4<br />
o. ol8a1-9.9119<br />
0.0126t0.0033<br />
o. ole$fs.9s3s<br />
0.04241s. ss99<br />
o.0356to.0061<br />
0. oo88to. oo15<br />
0.0224t9.9s56<br />
0.0444ro.0082<br />
o. ol8À3s, es63<br />
0. o¡42fq. es96<br />
o . 066210. 0071<br />
0.12381O.0115<br />
o,11l}6to.O'+25<br />
o.3t.J8!O.L2t+3<br />
0.0670t0. 006¡l<br />
o.0t_82t0.0042<br />
0.2148á0.038I<br />
7<br />
FAECES (5)<br />
o. 0288to. o12o<br />
0,01il**9.9934<br />
o.0332t9. s665<br />
0.0502t9. s162<br />
o.o456to. o13r<br />
o. or62to. 0056<br />
o.o3rsts. ss99<br />
O.O)t¡2t9.9939<br />
0. o38oto.0101<br />
O.0l¡62ta.9119<br />
o. o72o+0.0189<br />
0.0946ts. s2sg<br />
o. Olf$ts. s111<br />
o.ol8$1s.s131<br />
0. ol6$ts. s676<br />
0.oz32*o.060?<br />
0.1,Ì3610.0368<br />
AFTER CEREAL DTETS3<br />
rLEUpr (6)<br />
0. o4óoto. 0056<br />
0.017710.O01+t<br />
o.0352!O.Ot+Iz<br />
0.Ot¡[/*g.9933<br />
o. o4e$19. ss2s<br />
0.0110*0. o0og<br />
o. o238to.0029<br />
o.045516.ss34<br />
0.041$16.9s23<br />
0. 0572tO.0117<br />
o.o732IO.OO22<br />
O.ll¡2lta.9192<br />
o.u52t0.0690<br />
0.5548t0.31184<br />
o. o752JO. O14O<br />
0.0178*0.0013<br />
o,3oíJts.s545<br />
l'Íeans, expressed as grams per 1O0 gram dry matter intake, ánd standard deviation.<br />
No lLeaL and faecal co[ections were avairab]-e fro¡n pig nunber ó.<br />
fleal and faecal collections frorn M-/, fed foLlowing the cereal test diet sequence<br />
were spol1ed.<br />
Numbers 1! parentheses indicate the number of observations.<br />
uetermlned by acid hydrolysis.<br />
rl}<br />
¡'AEcES (6)<br />
0. o347ts. e13s<br />
o.Ot52t6.9422<br />
o. o442tO. Olr+3<br />
o.oó81J0.0292<br />
o.056?!0.o2oz<br />
0.019810. Oo74<br />
o.04o7ts.9171<br />
0.0468t0.0172<br />
o. 051oå0. ol7ó<br />
O.o632ts.s3a<br />
0.0943+0. o3o9<br />
o.rz5oxo.0376<br />
O.o497ts.sa92<br />
0.0665!9.ç2a2<br />
0;0502*0. O13O<br />
o.0302*0.0L21<br />
o.L%3*O.0666<br />
@ cl..
P.Ê;C anci SER. ?he net disappeai'ance was verl.¡ iarÊje ior<br />
Pi.O anci GiY. ,,euci_ne , i,t S, Ì'lJT, pi.jJ, ASp anci Tïi. snor,ved<br />
a nei increase from the end of the ileum to -,he anus.<br />
The metabolic ileat levels of pi,O and cLT varied<br />
extensivel¡r from pig to pig. <strong>fn</strong> general , the variation in<br />
1eve1s for the other amino acids was nuch 1e s s (Appendix,<br />
?able 9 ) . I'iost varÍation betl^reen the netabolic. faecal<br />
amino acid levels of the pigs coulC be attributed to pig<br />
nun?ber 1. The metabolic faecal anino acid levels of this<br />
pig were about twice as high as lhose of the other pigs<br />
(Appendix, Table 10).<br />
Lit/hüV ¿U.<br />
The appareni faecal amino acid availabilities<br />
deternined fror: ó normal pigs viere verJ¡ close to those<br />
deterr¿ined from the cannulated. pigs. The largest dif_<br />
f erences rniere found for barle}' end rangei fron l_ .2 tc 4.8<br />
pei'centage uniis for pRO and TIih. r.especti-ve1¡r (Tab1 e 22 an|<br />
¿, ) . ! aecar avaÍr-abilit'ie s fron corn and whea! rnrere neari¡r<br />
identica.l for cannulated and nornoal pigs. The iTS availa_<br />
bilities of nornel pigs were 8I .e, 79.g ênd. 7 j,J,.. f or corn,<br />
wheat anci barley respec-r,ive1]¡. <strong>fn</strong> the såne ord,er, chey we:,e<br />
83, 8,O.7 and.7?.jì; ior the cannulated pigs (TabJ_e 22 and Z)).<br />
The apparent a¡iino acid availabilities fron pig<br />
number ó were lower than -uhose of the otjier 5 pigs. .ihese<br />
ö/
¿ J{DJ¿ú ¿) ,<br />
CER¡AL GRATN CORN<br />
a<br />
AìirNo ActDs ø)-<br />
_Er-<br />
ìeea¡+.i ^ l<br />
HTS<br />
rtE<br />
.1.ìtTl<br />
LÏS<br />
Iiõ13<br />
PTiE<br />
¡: u:<br />
vA!<br />
Iln¡-liec--+.i ^1 ff:* têD<br />
r/-1T TT<br />
GIT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NITROc,Ð\r (ø)<br />
DRT l,:ATTiR (ø)<br />
Apparent faecaL airxi-no ecid. availabiliij_es<br />
of the cereel_ grains, in aCciiiiãn i;--nr-trogen<br />
and dry natter dige stibi.Iitie s<br />
I'or study 2b.<br />
or ,Ä<br />
92.uB<br />
87.84<br />
%.6r'<br />
81.84<br />
87.44<br />
9t.zE<br />
ô5.9L<br />
Ê': lA<br />
go.2A<br />
8ó. OA<br />
o2 dB<br />
86. oË<br />
oe ,.Ë<br />
on ÁA<br />
90. oA<br />
88. 5A<br />
89. oA<br />
Standard error of the r¡ean of 6<br />
Means ^in the sarne row with the<br />
significanrLy (p<br />
ô A? Ê<br />
r.660<br />
o.+16<br />
o.478<br />
n ??o<br />
0. 5r8<br />
^ Aa1<br />
0.552<br />
U.IòU<br />
observations per treatmen! .<br />
88<br />
sane superscript do not differ
dj-íferences were significan-t for pli¡ ancì Ar,À (Appendix,<br />
Table 11 ) . The inciiviiuel faecal_ a¡,:ino acid avai.Iab i1i*,, ie s<br />
fro¡n the pÍgs are shoun j-n the appenciix (?able J'Z, Lj, I4).<br />
The netabolic faecai a¡nino acid excretion in_<br />
creaseci as the i-evel of alphafloc was raised in -r,he<br />
iraintenance diets (Tebie 26).<br />
I7ith the exception of ARG and pHi there r,,jere no<br />
significant dii-ferences ciue to weighi (Appendix, Tabie 15).<br />
The p j-gs diff ered approxinatel¡.,- I C kg . in weight between i jre<br />
first and second tir,'Le thelr r^¡ere feci the sene naintenance<br />
ciiet. The ¡retabolic faecal_ Afr.G and pliE excretion were sig_<br />
nificantly higher for the lighter than heavier pígs fed the<br />
l.i-14 diet (Tabl_e 26). The individual pig d.å.-,,a ere shown in<br />
the appendix (?able 1ó and lZ).<br />
i_etabolic faecal anino acid e:ccretions were<br />
approxi-nate iy 3AÍí higher for Nhe r:.oxri¡âl than f or -i,he can_<br />
nul-âted pigs (Table 24 and, 26). As stated previousl¡,,,<br />
¡here was consiCerable variation in the net,abolic faecal<br />
anino acid excretion in study 2a. îhe variation that was<br />
observed could be lai.gel¡, attribut,eci ro one particular pig.<br />
Stuciy 3<br />
This study was subdi_vided into Z separate experinenrs.<br />
Study Ja deals with the inîusj.on of j.soleted soy p¡oiein. .,:jx_<br />
perinent lb invorved the infusi-on o.f rysine monohyciro chr-ori.cie<br />
i-nto the caecun.<br />
AÕ
ì i+;. La ¿a . l.ìetabolic faecal anino acid<br />
for stud,w 2b.<br />
P]P.TOÐ CF<br />
t0LL;CTIOi'i<br />
ÞEFORI cE.,ìt]i,i<br />
iiliris<br />
ÁFTLR 'lltulÁi<br />
ÐËis<br />
L;I¿:I OF<br />
ALPHAFL0C (;3) 14<br />
!+<br />
A:lr}ÍO ACTÐS3<br />
Esç9Et ial<br />
-{'-LLl<br />
i-tIs<br />
rj.E<br />
lTs<br />
i i.C¡ l'Y<br />
P;iE<br />
iFR<br />
VAL<br />
IIon-f,s sent ia1<br />
AiÁ<br />
ASP<br />
L'L U<br />
GLY<br />
I)5 /\<br />
c:1D<br />
}JÏTROGE}.I<br />
)<br />
3<br />
ne oBC<br />
. OO8B<br />
.0278<br />
. o4tE<br />
.OTÐ<br />
. 012E<br />
-oz5bc<br />
.ozgB<br />
.03zB<br />
. o4oÊ<br />
.o628<br />
. oSoE<br />
.Q32B<br />
.03zÊ<br />
.$zE<br />
. olgB<br />
.11g8<br />
.úzA<br />
.0114<br />
.0394<br />
.060å<br />
.OL7A<br />
. OITA<br />
^^.4<br />
.uJo"<br />
.oÐA<br />
. o48A<br />
. o58A<br />
.0884<br />
.It4A<br />
. o46A<br />
.043Â<br />
.0434<br />
,O26L<br />
¡ z.A<br />
nr cC<br />
.oo7B<br />
.o2gË<br />
.Qj,6IÞ<br />
.03OE<br />
.012Ë<br />
. o20c<br />
.o?68<br />
. 03tB<br />
.vt ^- )- -Þ<br />
.o5?B<br />
. o87E<br />
ac¡B<br />
. 03oË<br />
.ú6b<br />
. 015E<br />
.1218<br />
qô<br />
and nitrogen levelsl<br />
e_2<br />
.o26L, .OO17O<br />
.012^ .00078<br />
.ol8Ä .oa253<br />
.oi4Å .oaLLz<br />
.o45!' .oo3o2<br />
.o2oå .OO14g<br />
.0318 .00226<br />
.036'A .oo3zt<br />
.0454 .oo3gz-<br />
.or| .oo4o5<br />
.0884 .oozol<br />
.1124 .OA76g<br />
.o4oA .oc2g3<br />
. o4oA .00254<br />
.044À .oozg9<br />
.o; L .oor9ô<br />
,v5A .00ð61<br />
i eans fron 5 observations, e:i)ressed per lOO gr.an of di.;r<br />
matter iniake.<br />
Standard, errcr of the nean.<br />
IlÍeans in- the sane row with .the same superscript do not differ<br />
significantlJ, G
jictar-r' arino ac il arc i:itt c-=en ::ral.'ses a:-: shc,¡;n in<br />
T:bIe 2?. ihe le .,'el of LTS fr.ci: ts+2¿Sp was C.15Í hiEher tÌ:an<br />
ih^t ^¡<br />
';-:-C) r:L¡ inÄir-ì.t.,^.1 t^+- ^-.<br />
'-i.dL Lr- .c.l-"1,1 .-. :îe r¡,*: v_!,-:4¿r .i6vc dt€ .ii'l:n in T¿b1e 23 a:;<br />
âre sunnerizei in ?a'c1e 29.<br />
T'he ancunt cf nitrcgon retain_.cÌ per då1, we s sig_<br />
nificantl;' higher for- E-2rS? than ícr. the cther 2 diets, fcr<br />
v;hich ihe dailir nitrcgen retentions 'ú¡ere al-most siril-ar (Tabre<br />
2c; .a.ppendix, Table 18). lhe retention of nitrclen, exÞressed<br />
pe :' 100 grans cf çi¡rr ¡-+lcr- intake, 'r'1¡e s apprcxinatellr I g. fcr<br />
the E'2i3P Ci:t and C.9 -E. fcr the i=_S? and Ë-fS?+J-I3? diets.<br />
The latter Ì,re s nct significant at the !i-, ]er.-el of significance ,<br />
but wes sísnificant at the 1O;:1 ler.el cf si::nificance. percent<br />
nit'o¡¡en retention and bi"clcrical va.rr:e we.e the highest fci.<br />
E+iSP and were significantl¡; highe:. than thcse .fcr E+iSp+a-ISp,<br />
bui not tiìan the values for E+2lSp.<br />
if all- caecal_l¡' infusei ISp h¿d 'ceen Cisestei, absorbeC<br />
anci utili zei tc the saäe ext3nt in the lar..3e ini-estlne as in the<br />
s¡nal-l intestine, then 18.0 g. cf niticgen v¡cu1C heve been re_<br />
te ined per dal¡ (ïa'ole 2ç ) . ff not ut ilizeC at all , it nai, be<br />
:xtrectei that 1i, Ê g. cf nitrcã3n wouli 1--e1,.3 been i"etained .f:.cn<br />
the cae cafl-;' fed fSP. îhe ercunt retê-ined fr.c:: Ë=iSp*C_ïSF<br />
'¡':a s jound tc '¡e 15.?1 C., ',rhich is cnj-v C.tI .r. I roie th.en<br />
lts.qr ''I < Êa 0.11 .<br />
Õl
T ABLE 27. Amino acid and nitrogen compositionl of test<br />
diets in stud../ 3.<br />
DIETS E1-¿!Ðr E+ISP E+ISP+LYS<br />
AlirNo AcrDS (ø)<br />
Essential<br />
--T-FG-<br />
HTS<br />
]LE<br />
LEU<br />
T!.e<br />
I.,:ET¿<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
--TÏÃ.- Non-Essential<br />
^ eD<br />
CYS¿<br />
CLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NTTROGEN (ø)<br />
0.88<br />
o.lo<br />
u. /)<br />
r.32<br />
o.7r<br />
ç.¿4<br />
0.96<br />
o .57<br />
o.87<br />
o.69<br />
1 ?ô<br />
0.21<br />
4.23<br />
0 .68<br />
o.7t<br />
0.44<br />
? .l+86<br />
I E*p"""""d as percent of dry matter.<br />
2 Ðetermined b:¡ the oxidatíon ¡irethcd.<br />
0.68<br />
c.27<br />
4.55<br />
1.03<br />
o.;6<br />
c. 21<br />
0.68<br />
o.so<br />
aì o<<br />
o.22<br />
3.39<br />
0.55<br />
L, J9<br />
4.55<br />
0.31,<br />
2.096<br />
e.66<br />
4.27<br />
4.55<br />
I.A2<br />
o.7t<br />
0.2I<br />
4.7 5<br />
0.68<br />
u.> /<br />
L O',1<br />
3 .Ll+<br />
t.)4<br />
v.) /<br />
V.JJ<br />
¿.vvL<br />
92
!tI-i,) Z¿ <strong>fn</strong>dividual dai ly niti"ogen intakes anC faecal ancl<br />
urinary losses and soíté calculated paraneters in<br />
study 3a.<br />
PERTOÐ ]I iir<br />
Pie no. I<br />
lìitrogen intake<br />
(s,/da.t )<br />
FaecaI nitroEen<br />
loss (g/da¡.)<br />
Urinar'¡ nitroeen<br />
1oss" (e/dal'J<br />
liitroeen retaíned<br />
t<br />
\ ál ^/;^--\ \rdl I<br />
I'iit:'ogen retained2<br />
Ìiitrogen retentì on<br />
(::)t<br />
EioL oli c al<br />
valüe (:í )4<br />
en intake<br />
Faeca1 nitrcgen loss<br />
Urinary nitrogen loss<br />
liitrogen retained<br />
l{itrogen retained.2<br />
liitrogen retentionS<br />
Ei.ological value4<br />
Þi¡: ¡n ?<br />
Ìrtitrogen iniake<br />
Faecal nitrogen loss<br />
ilrinary nitrðgen loss<br />
lJitroien retained<br />
tiitrolen retained2-<br />
Nitrogen retentionJ<br />
Ðiological value4<br />
(¡+ersp)l (E+rsp)<br />
,,'l ô(<br />
"AÔ<br />
16.80<br />
t7.?6<br />
t.o23<br />
4I.L4<br />
50. ó8<br />
34.88<br />
,7 20<br />
L).Ló<br />
14.31<br />
0. B6c<br />
41 .03<br />
52.06<br />
?'7 '7 Ò<br />
JñO<br />
14.41<br />
lo.Zy<br />
0.904<br />
43.tr<br />
53.06<br />
48.1ó<br />
ro.4z<br />
tt t,1<br />
15,42<br />
o.855<br />
32.O2<br />
4C.9L<br />
(B+ts?-ù-ïs?) (;-2ïsp)<br />
U+.45<br />
9.9s<br />
t8.¡z<br />
15.95<br />
0.95s<br />
46.27<br />
l+5 .l+5<br />
Ê (ô<br />
18.49<br />
r8.37<br />
1 .005<br />
l+O.42<br />
lþ9.81+<br />
I Abbreviations in parentheses indj_cate the clj.et fed-<br />
93<br />
(!+rsP+C- _iSP )<br />
)u.)ö<br />
o r.t<br />
2t+.61<br />
ro.J()<br />
o.867<br />
)..+t<br />
39.93<br />
+2!<br />
t+7 .54<br />
o . r,Lu<br />
)^ ,7^<br />
l-ó.Jó<br />
o.96t<br />
Ji5. OÞ<br />
40. yo<br />
rr: !ì-c Ð ì<br />
39.53<br />
t.¿)<br />
15.48<br />
1ó. 60<br />
o'89r<br />
52.A4<br />
" crans of n:trogen reteinec per r0o grans of cÌri' r:atter in-"ar;e.<br />
a<br />
Percent nitrogen retained..<br />
l::::lt nitrogen retained. fron_nitrogen absorbed; Ìietabolic<br />
reecer anc¡ endoãenous urinary l0sses were no! taken into âccoun!.
TABTU 29<br />
DT¡I1<br />
II!gq<br />
l'litrogen retained (g./rl"y )<br />
llltrogen retained3<br />
lJitrogen retention (Íl)4<br />
Eiological value iJí)5<br />
f tliourru with the<br />
2 Standard error<br />
3, +t 5 As shown<br />
The averagel amounts of nitrogen retained, nitrogen<br />
retentj-ons and biological values for dietå in stud.y ja.<br />
E+2ïSP<br />
18.004<br />
0.9t)6Â<br />
LO.o7A<br />
t+9.16Ã<br />
D+TSP<br />
same superscript in tire same ro!! do not differ significantry (p(.05).<br />
of tlle mean.<br />
in lab1e 28.<br />
r5.80ts<br />
0.8854<br />
L2.2rlqc<br />
roA<br />
B+]SP1.C-ISP<br />
L5,9LB<br />
0.8934<br />
T,46D<br />
42 378<br />
a,2<br />
¡Jx<br />
.27L8<br />
.oL5z6<br />
.62?r<br />
'1<br />
1. ¿1õ<br />
\o
¡¡¿¡ for E+ISP. Therefor:e, 'uhe rel-ative i.etention of caecat l:¡<br />
infused ISP r\tâs onl,.: Ji,I of ihat of orall'¡ supplied fSP.<br />
The average ni'r,rcgen intake, faecaÌ nitlogen 1oss,<br />
uriner:¡ nitrogen loss and retained nitr.ogen -,tere )7.UC, 7,Zt+,<br />
t4.ló anci 15.60 g. per day respectivelj¡ for the pigs fed<br />
bl-ISP. In the sarie order, ihese values were l+7 .66 , 9 .95 ,<br />
2l-.ð0 and 15.91 g. pe:' ciaT respecrir¡ely for pigs given<br />
Ë+ISP+C-ISP (fab1e Z6 and 29). Of the nitrogen caecaliy<br />
i:rfused which was IO.Z62¿., 2.7L3g. v¡as lost in the iaeces,<br />
7.++ag. was lost in the urine and O.t15S. was retained.<br />
Jxpresseci on a percentage basis, Zó.Lií of the nitrogen froln<br />
caecally infused ISP was excreted in the faeces, 72.5.)¡ was<br />
¿xcret:d in ihe uri ne and 1. !i:3 was retained by the pi-gs.<br />
Studv 3b.<br />
ihe indi'¡idual ciata are given in TabLe IO and are<br />
surnr::arized in Table JI. Dala fror,r pig nurnber 6 on t:.eatrnent<br />
E+fSP+C-LlS were not available. Statistical anall,ses coulci<br />
be perforned with the inclusion oí the calculated raissing<br />
values (Table li ) . i{owevei, this 'r¡¡ould. be of no use in<br />
1(ì - 0.li :)(1o.00<br />
\) - l_).õ0)( x ICO.<br />
2(g.;¡ + ro.37 + 10.85) : 3 = ra,z6. 3g.gs - 7.24 = 2.7L.<br />
4z1.so - rL.3ó = ?.t+4. 5t;.gt - 15.so : o.rrr.<br />
,o5
.¡;t Et f¡ ra\ ïndividual daily nitrogen intakes ancÌ faecal- and<br />
urinerj' lopses and sor:re calcul_ated parâneters<br />
in stud¡r Jb.<br />
PiRIOD rt rir<br />
intake<br />
Faeca1 nitrosen loss<br />
G/d.v)<br />
Urinary nitrogen l_oss<br />
G/aav ) -<br />
Nitrogen retained<br />
G/arv)<br />
r liitrogen retained.2<br />
I\,litrggen retention<br />
(fr)r<br />
eiijiogical value (ii)4<br />
Pìô ñ^ Â<br />
Nitrogen intake<br />
FaecaL nitrogen loss<br />
ürÍna::y nitrogen loss<br />
L itr:ogen retained^<br />
Nitrogen retained¿<br />
i'iitrolen retentipn3<br />
Eiological value4<br />
Píe no. ó<br />
üitrogen intake<br />
Faeca1 nitrogen loss<br />
Jrinari.' nitrogen Ìoss<br />
Nitrosen retained<br />
liitrolen retained2<br />
llitrogen ret entíonJ<br />
ljr-oIog]-caI val_ue¿+<br />
I, 21 3, l+<br />
5<br />
96<br />
(E+rsp+c-tys)1 (s+lsp+i,ys) (B+Isp)<br />
3t+.88<br />
/.LO<br />
13.04<br />
14.68<br />
0.882<br />
l.t ño<br />
53.L7<br />
(E+rsP )<br />
34.88<br />
7 .68<br />
1r ?o<br />
14.81<br />
0.900<br />
4¿.40<br />
5lt . lt5<br />
(E+ISP+LTS )<br />
35.o4<br />
7.62<br />
10.80<br />
16.62<br />
0.992<br />
+t.4)<br />
60.6t<br />
As shown in Table 28.<br />
2'7 ÕA<br />
6 't+6<br />
13 .50<br />
18.00<br />
n ool<br />
l+7.1+2<br />
57 .r4<br />
37 .79<br />
7 .39<br />
1t, aþ<br />
1ó'¡e<br />
ô oaìo<br />
t+3.34<br />
TAÐLì 3I. lY"frg?l anounts of nitrogen retained, nitrogen retentions and<br />
bi.ological values for dÍeis i.n stud1, jb.<br />
2<br />
DTjlTS<br />
ÏTU]:S<br />
I'litrogen retained (e/day)<br />
Nitrogen retained3<br />
ltritrogen retention4 (i¿)<br />
Eiological vatue5 (i3)<br />
Statistical analyses were not perforned.<br />
Values in parentheses do not include the<br />
IE<br />
* ¡ ) Âs shovrn in Table 28.<br />
BI'ISP-I-C-LYS<br />
r5.68<br />
0.877<br />
l+I ,97<br />
52.88<br />
(r5 . fi )z 17 .71+<br />
(0.896 ) 0.988<br />
(trz.zz) t*z.ztr<br />
(sl.sl) sq.oz<br />
n-!TQ D-LI ve E+ISP<br />
calculated missing values.<br />
l-5.36<br />
o.866<br />
4I.I5<br />
5t.27<br />
\o<br />
{
-r"his study since the error degrees of freedom woul_d. d.ecrease<br />
fyom 2 to 1 resu.lting in the increase of F critical fro¡n<br />
19.0 to 200.00 (at the J,rà leveL of significance).<br />
All pararaeters determined were the highest for<br />
E+ISP+LYS and the lowest for Ë+lSp. The values obtained<br />
for B+ISP+C-LTS were slightly higher than those of B+lSp<br />
(Table l1) .<br />
Including the calculated missing value the arílount<br />
of nitrogen retained per day increased by O.32I¿. upon LyS<br />
infusion ínto the caecua. Ora11y given LIS increased the<br />
arûount of nitrogen retained per day by Z.3g2e. (Table jI).<br />
Therefore, ihe relative irnprovement in nitrogen retained.<br />
per day (S. ) of caecally infused l,yS was only ll .t3il ot<br />
that oraliy supplÍed LYS.<br />
Study l¡.<br />
Study 4a.<br />
The nitrogen and. fiber l-evels decreased fron<br />
B+S+l{ to whole wheat and to flour (Tabl e 32) . B+S+1,,Í contained<br />
much higher leve1s of ARG, HfS, LyS, AiA, ASp and GLy than<br />
flour while those of THA., VAL, SER and TyR were slightly<br />
1r¡.69 - r.-.36 = o,32. ?tz .zL, - L5.36 = 2.32.<br />
3 (o.zl | 2.3Ð x too = t3.Lt¿.<br />
AR
TAlltE 32 Proximate, acÍd and neu.tral-detergent fiber ancl chrorìic oxicle analysesl<br />
for diets'of study d.<br />
DTI¡TS I,JI{OLB TIHEAT<br />
LEI¡EL 0F AtPHAFtoc (ø)<br />
Jr:luå (,¿)<br />
NÍtrogen.<br />
Ether extract,<br />
Fiber:<br />
lrude<br />
Ac id-det ergent<br />
lleutral -det ergent<br />
Ash<br />
Chromic oxide<br />
2'4e<br />
r.66<br />
2.3 5<br />
5.38<br />
12,L7<br />
4.82<br />
o.5z<br />
f,xpressed on a dry weight basis.<br />
FLOLIR<br />
2.35<br />
r.03<br />
n rÃ<br />
3.2r<br />
3.43<br />
4.01<br />
o.56<br />
!r-S+Ì,i<br />
2.7 5<br />
4.48<br />
8.trg<br />
12.94<br />
40.98<br />
8.44<br />
o.55<br />
PROTBÌN-FRII]]<br />
510<br />
0.09 0.10<br />
1.06 1.16<br />
3 .86 6.80<br />
6.t z 9.9o<br />
3.26 3.os<br />
o.59 0.55<br />
L5<br />
0.11<br />
1.00<br />
10.83<br />
L4.6t+<br />
3.r5<br />
o.55<br />
\o<br />
\o
higher. fhe levels of PliI , GiU and pRO were nuch lor,ver<br />
in E;S+i-., than in flour. As expected , the arnino acici<br />
'I evel-s of whole whreat '¡ere be-r,vreen those of E+S+i_ and<br />
rroì.Ìr ( _LaC,J_e )J ) .<br />
Statistical_ anall.,ses could not be perforned,<br />
et leest not in the forn of a single cross_over desj-gn on<br />
t,he apparent amino acid a¡¡ailebilities .fi-c:r r¡rhole wheat,<br />
flour and Ë+S+Ì,i (Table 34). pigs nurnbered 1, 2, 4 and.7<br />
re.íused to consuÌne the E+S+i: diet (Fi.g. I ). Ðata obtained<br />
fron repì.acerirent, pig nunber ó (ciay 23-29) are included in<br />
the avai-labilities of ani-no acids fron Ë+S+iÍ.<br />
Generall;', apparent ileal and faecal anino acid<br />
availabilities decreased frorn flour to whol_e r¡¡heat to<br />
B+S+l!Í. Total nitrogen and dr:. ¡rttu" digestibilities<br />
followed the sene pattein (Table 34).<br />
ihe differences in percentage unit,s beiv¡een il_eal_<br />
anci iaecal availab ili-i,ie s were the snallest for flour and<br />
t'he largest for diet E+s+r'.i. lhe differences for arr- d.iets<br />
vrere alrva1's the nost pronounced for AF,G, älS, TI{R, Gi,y, FitC,<br />
and StrR (la¡re 14).<br />
L).sine and ?h-Lì, r,,¡ere about equall;r the least<br />
available essential anino aci,ds of whole wheat and fLour<br />
when de'r,ernined at the end of the ileun. Lysine was the<br />
least availabie f:"on these 2 diets when deternined by the<br />
100
TAEIE 33 Amj-no acid coinposition of diets from study d.<br />
ÐIETS tr.,IHOLE I.!'HãAT<br />
ßL c/r68v2<br />
AI.:ÏTIC ACIÐS<br />
'¡cêsh+ j _TFG^l<br />
dlù<br />
rlE<br />
L¡u<br />
l.¿î,<br />
PJiE<br />
iri¡.<br />
'yAt<br />
itl on- ls s ent ial<br />
ÀiA<br />
,\ cÐ<br />
GI,i]<br />
GIY<br />
PRO<br />
c¡Þ<br />
T:-.-i,<br />
o.66<br />
o.3z<br />
o .5L<br />
1.01<br />
w.) I<br />
o.73<br />
0.40<br />
0.50 3 ,25<br />
o.7 6 4.9L<br />
L.69 30.5c,<br />
0.60 3 ,92<br />
r.u9 9.69<br />
0.60 3.92<br />
c.34 2.L9<br />
4.27 O.47<br />
2.O7 0.29<br />
3.52 O,55<br />
6.57 1.oo<br />
., )Y u . ¿,<br />
r.37 0.17<br />
4.72 O.76<br />
¿.)Y U.JC<br />
!+.3L 0. ó1<br />
I ExpresseC on a dry weight basis.<br />
2 Graris per 16 grains of nì-trogen.<br />
3 Ðetermined. by acid hydrolysis.<br />
FLOUR<br />
/" g/t6¿i;<br />
3.24<br />
¿.vr<br />
3.?t+<br />
!. (4<br />
r.1ó<br />
)..)<br />
2.44<br />
l. a^<br />
1.0i<br />
o.,rz<br />
4.55<br />
1.01<br />
o.59<br />
9.72<br />
u.oo<br />
a.+5<br />
u.4u ^ 2.','ô ã/<br />
o.7g<br />
^r.iâ4^ v.)t ).J) I.t,<br />
5.L9 35,57 3 .23<br />
v.+o ,t.¿> U.o¿!<br />
r.67 11.45 a.9i<br />
o.¡¿ 3.99 C.óó<br />
0.30 2.A5 O.34<br />
E+S+il<br />
I01<br />
s/t6st:<br />
o . .l_l-<br />
2.t+6<br />
3 .18<br />
ÃÕo<br />
I la<br />
r.45<br />
? !r1<br />
.
TABLE 3ò. Apperent llea1 and fâecal a¡nlno acld aveilebllftiesl<br />
of 'r,vho16 wheat, flour and B+S+li{ snd B+S+M_D for study ,}.<br />
I¡CATION<br />
AMINO ACÎDS (ø}<br />
Essentlal<br />
--¡rõ-<br />
Hts<br />
II,E<br />
LEU<br />
LIs<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAI,<br />
Non-Essêntle]'<br />
WHOLE WHEAT (6)2<br />
FAECES<br />
6z.t!L.7 9,+.6!0.j<br />
88.411,4 %.9!o.9<br />
89.112.o 91.6t1. o<br />
89.9Jr.i 9t.a!o,s<br />
79.5:?'] d6.rt1.2<br />
92.t+t2.2 93.[11.8<br />
9r.511.1 g4.t!o.7<br />
78.¡t2,5 89.110.9<br />
86.ztL.T g]-.rí.r<br />
_ffif--<br />
79.6t2.6 86.111.5<br />
ÂSP 8O.8*z. j 88. Ot¡..2<br />
GLU 95.6to.6 g7.gto.L<br />
GLr ?2.6t6.2 90.6f0.6<br />
PRo 79.LtLt+.2 96.8{.I<br />
sEn 86.VtA.5 gt+.'!o.g<br />
rIR 89.2!L.T 92.9!¡.2<br />
NrrRocEN (ø). 85.2tL.7 gt.1to.6<br />
DRr MATÎER (ø) 78,2*r.6 69,1*0.5<br />
¡- Mea¡s å.nd standard devlation. 2<br />
obseñrations par dietaty treatnent.<br />
ILEI'I.1<br />
rl,oun (6)<br />
FÀECES<br />
90.7!2.5 95.#rJ 8f.êr1.j<br />
Ð.9!o.t 96.6t1.r ?8.ita.6<br />
91.9!0.6 gt+.?!r,i 72.gt2.3<br />
9t+.6!o.5 95.5!L.4 7\.h4.o<br />
8U.2!L.6 86.0!,+.5 6ó.4È4.6<br />
9J.TtL3 93.t+t2.? 7?.8t3.8<br />
95.51L.L 96.3t1.1 ?6.ot2.5<br />
85.4t1.5 gzlt23 fi.gt6.j<br />
92.7ts.5 gt+J*r.6 7rJ!z.z<br />
86. ¡.to.9 90.Bta.B 70.2!o.?<br />
85.5xL.O 89.2f9,O 69.È!L.2<br />
97.gxO.L gÉ.610.[ 65.8t1.2<br />
78.5t7.¿ 93.6xL.8 57.?r8.9<br />
83.0114.? 98.5ts.n Zo,3tu.o<br />
91.210.4 95.Btt'J ?2.2!z.L<br />
%.L!o.? 94.411.4 7L.L4.o<br />
90.5h.8 95,6to.g 69.Btt.rr<br />
90.zto.,+ 9j.olo.8 LV j!2.7<br />
B+S+M (3)<br />
{unbèrs ln pqrenthesès- lndlcate the nuûber of<br />
, Detêrnlned by acid hydrolysls<br />
FA-ECES<br />
B+S+M-D (6)<br />
FAECES<br />
90,0*2.1 7L.5t6.7 90.2{.0<br />
88.8*2.5 n.6+3.r 88.011.5<br />
74.6!z,o 69.6!L.6 Z5.j!U.o<br />
78.2t2; ZL.7ty.7 Èo.7t2.g<br />
75.stt+,2 i?.l,i'.9 77.6t3.L<br />
8t.dtr.Z Z6. j!6.o n.z!7.6<br />
79.5!r.8 n.g!L} Bt.5!2.6<br />
7L3+.5 t+7 .84.9 Z,+.?*) .z<br />
T6.o!u.7 66.5!2.6 78.2!t.z<br />
75 .5t3.3<br />
75.6!2.8<br />
89.9io.9<br />
?è 3tL.5<br />
89.5+2.4<br />
83 .1f1.6<br />
78.Êt2.L<br />
8o.gta.7<br />
65 . otl.5<br />
60.7t5 .9<br />
6t+.213,3<br />
83.81r.6<br />
3L.gtz]..o<br />
-47.5+66,5<br />
67.7!2.8<br />
6Ê.5!2.6<br />
59.2t6.3<br />
69.ztr,L<br />
76.2!r+.O<br />
78 .zl;z .5<br />
90.911.4<br />
79 JÌ2.j<br />
78.,+t2,8<br />
8,+,2!2.?<br />
78.6t? .8<br />
83 . O*1.<br />
ü.9ro.3<br />
'+<br />
ts<br />
\)
faecal analysis method.<br />
The ileal availabilitíes of essential amino acíds<br />
fror¿ diet E+S+I{ were very low. They were 66.4 ana y.)iL for<br />
iïS and Täi. respectively. îhose of the other essential<br />
amino acids varied between ZI .j and St+.}î¿. Isoleucine,<br />
LïS, THR and VAL were about equa11¡' the Least available<br />
from diet B+s+ì'{ r¡rhen deternined by the faecal anaLysis ¡:rethod<br />
103'<br />
and their avaiLabÍlj.ties ranged fro¡n 7l .3 to 76.96 (Table 34).<br />
The apparent ileal availabilities of ARG, GIy and<br />
PRO were markedly lower for the cornstarch dituteC Ë+S+i..i diet<br />
(f+S+i.t-O) rhan fo:. the E+S+ir.{ diet. The ileal availability<br />
of PRO fron E+S+¡.I-D was even found to be negative i.e. more<br />
PRO leaves the end of the ileun: than is ingested. The ileal<br />
availabilities of the other amino aci.ds were also rower for<br />
E+S+].i-Ð than for E+S+Ì.Í but to a lesser extent. The apparent<br />
faecal arnino acid availabilities of Ë+S+ll end. E+S+li_D, vrj.th<br />
the exception of PRO and i,$T, were of the same order<br />
(Tabte 34).<br />
The individual apparent ileat and faecal amino<br />
acid availabllities, in addition to nitrogen and dry natter<br />
digestibilities and average daily dry natter intake of the<br />
pigs fed whole wheat, flour, diet E+S+i,j and diet E+S+1.:_D<br />
are shor/vn in the appendix (Table L9, ?Or ZI and, ZZ).<br />
The levels of the ileal and faecal anino acids,
total nitrogen and dr.r¡ natter increased e.s the level of<br />
alphafloc of the protein-free di3-,.s was increesed. The<br />
j-ncrer:ent i:r ar.ino åcid levels r.¡as r:uch larger v¡hen the<br />
leve1 of alphafloc was raised from 5 to lOÍj than fron<br />
Io Lo I5/, (Ta¡le 15).<br />
!'or al_l_ protein-free cìiet,s, lhere was a large<br />
disappearance of ARG, TIji,, GLy, pRO, SnR, total nitrogen<br />
and dr" natter bet¡¡¡een the end of the ir-eunl and the rectu¡rr.<br />
The net disapþearance was lerÍ:est for p?0, followed b ¡,, GLy.<br />
Proline and GLY in this order were arso the fir.st and second<br />
nost p::.oninent anino acids in iteal digesta. The levels of<br />
these a¡rino acids in i1eal digesta varied markecillr from<br />
pig to pig as shown by the relatively 1r"*u standard<br />
cieviations for these ariino acicis compared ¡o ihose of the<br />
other ailino ec j_ds (Tabl e 35) . Arginine v¡as -r,he aos-L pro_<br />
ninent essen'r,ial_ a¡nino acici in ilea1 die,osta.<br />
SnaLl but consisient, increases were founci for<br />
i:i, !:J, iTS,;.;T, illJ, T.ú anci ÀSp fro¡;l -.he end of the<br />
il-eum to the rectun (îable j5).<br />
0nl1' 4 of the ac-{,uaJ- ó test pigs consuneci the pF-iC<br />
diet (Fig. I ). 'jhe average nerabolic ileai enli í¿ecaj- a;.:i:t
TABLE 35. Metabolic ilea1 and<br />
in study l¡¿.<br />
LEVEL oF ATPHAFIoC (ø)<br />
LOCATTON<br />
AMTNO ACTDSz<br />
Ess ential<br />
--Ãñõ--<br />
HIS<br />
IT,E<br />
Ï,8I'<br />
LYS<br />
¡,8T3<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VÀL<br />
Non-EEsential<br />
--î:iÃ'-<br />
ASP<br />
. CYS3<br />
GLU<br />
OLY<br />
Pn0<br />
SER<br />
TTR<br />
NTTROGEN<br />
DNT MÁTTEN<br />
t"<br />
¿<br />
?<br />
rr,EüM (6)<br />
0.04919. s23<br />
o. or4fs.693<br />
0. o21to. OOI<br />
o . o39Io. ooz<br />
0.02lfg.693<br />
0. oo6to. oo1<br />
O. oz3ts. ss4<br />
o.OlPtq. s95<br />
o.031t6.6s4<br />
0.0411s. ss9<br />
o. 056to. oo9<br />
o.o¡ts.ss2<br />
0.07119.912<br />
o.139tO.Oó5<br />
o.t+7t+!O;2j<br />
o.03810. 006<br />
0.Ot3tg.s92<br />
0.20Jfs. s76<br />
IL.6l t6.95<br />
faecal amino acld levels<br />
FAECES (6) rrEUM (5)<br />
o. o22to. OO2<br />
o. o10to. ool<br />
o. oe7ts. e94<br />
0. o42to. OO5<br />
o. o36ts. ss3<br />
o.o12to.OO2<br />
o.o2óJo.oo3<br />
o.03oto. oo4<br />
O. O33to. oo,+<br />
o. o3$ts.6s5<br />
o. o61to. 006<br />
o. o10jo. ooL<br />
o. o68to. oo8<br />
0.03r+s.664<br />
0.02610. oo5<br />
0.0251s.692<br />
o.Orlfa. s94<br />
o.101tO. OOg<br />
6.48 !O33<br />
o.056Ès. s14<br />
0. oL7to. oo2<br />
o. o2lts. ssg<br />
0.05119.911<br />
o. 036Jo. oo8<br />
0.00810. oo3<br />
o. o3oJo. oo7<br />
o.051ts.6qg<br />
0.04316. s69<br />
o. 05óto. o1o<br />
o. o78to. or3<br />
o. o16to. oo3<br />
o.094ts.913<br />
0. r7rf6. s43<br />
o.57?to.2?2<br />
0, o&9t0. oo7<br />
0.015t0.004<br />
o.256tO.O52<br />
L7.69 tO.99<br />
Numbers in parentheses indlcate the number of observations.<br />
H:;Ï-il3o"li"tf,å*"1iåî?lå'fi¿rf;äåressed' as'erams per 100 grams of d,ry rnaæer inrake.<br />
10<br />
FAECES (5)<br />
o. ozPtg. s93<br />
0.O14tq.662<br />
o. o39to. 006<br />
0.05916.966<br />
o. or+8t0. oo7<br />
o.oyt6.g93<br />
o. 037ts. s95<br />
o. or+rto. oo7<br />
0.04919.967<br />
0.053Ès.9s6<br />
O.O8!¡t6.s13<br />
0. O1jts.6s2<br />
0.096fs.915<br />
o. o43ts. q66<br />
0.ol+6to.006<br />
o. o35ts. s64<br />
0. o16to. oo2<br />
0. 139*0. 019<br />
Lo.JJ x6.44<br />
%<br />
rrEuM (3)<br />
0.06110.012<br />
o. o22to. OO7<br />
o.Ollts. sg5<br />
o.05719. g1g<br />
o. O39ts. s11<br />
I5<br />
TAECES (3)<br />
o.o33ts.s64<br />
o. o15to. OOL<br />
0. o45ts. s93<br />
o. o67to. OOr¡<br />
o.o54ts.s65<br />
o.o33tg.6s6 o.o4,oto.oo3<br />
0.059+0.o1r+ o.orÌ5to.oo5<br />
0.04436.s1s 0.05319.9s5<br />
o.o5$1e.e66 o.o59ts.ss7<br />
o.o8r1o.ot2 o.o96to.oto<br />
o. rooto. ot 9<br />
0.16!ts. s15<br />
0.58510.161<br />
o.05316.916<br />
o. or6to. oo5<br />
9.27L+o.o3r+<br />
?6.32 x0.g5<br />
o. Lo81o. oro<br />
0.o47t9.995<br />
o. ol8ts. ss4<br />
O.O37tg.gg2<br />
o. o18to. oor+<br />
0.161t0. OrO<br />
L4.7àtO.99<br />
o
Generallir, there were no suLstenriat diÍferences due -u o ,lci;.<br />
weight on the neiabolic iiear and faecal_ a::ino aciC l_ev:ls.<br />
The ievei-s of ij-eal ÀF,.C, pR,C and. GLy varled sl:_ghl1r; iriore<br />
than tiie levels of the other anino acids (Appendix, Tabte 24).<br />
a-rg 9:'- nu*tioers -..*L^--- 3 and 5 lrere the only ones of the ó<br />
test' pigs that consu¡¡red ihe pF-li dÍet (lig. 3¡. The average<br />
netabolic ileal and faecal a:tìino ecici l_evel_s obtai-neC f:on<br />
replacenent pig nirïbe r 6 are inclucied in ciata fcr diei pF_L5<br />
in Tab1e 35. ?ig nu,nber ó gaineci about I j kg. fron tl:e firs-.<br />
ti¡:e (dal¡ 12-18 ) to the seconci tine (day 3t+_UO) it was feci<br />
106<br />
the PF-I5 diet (Fj-e. 3). Âlthough ihere were so¡ae di_fÍer.ences<br />
in ileal and faecal amino acid revels betvreen the 2 corrections,<br />
they were of a relativell¡ snêll nagnitude (.ê.ppendixr. îable 25).<br />
the individual neNabolic i-Ieal and feecal a:iino acid<br />
levels , in adC.i--r"ion to nítrogen antj. dry natter (as grans per<br />
1C0 gra,ts o-f Cr1- matter Íntake ) ancÌ daili, cÌr]r n¿¡¿u" intake<br />
are shown in the aopenciix (?able 23 , ZL and 25 ) .<br />
Stuciv Lb.<br />
sixty percent oí Lhe part,icres of the crackeci l^¡heat<br />
did not pass thi.ough a 2.CO riüt sieve, gOi, dici not pass<br />
ihrough a 1.0C arÍl screen (Table 3ó). The particle size<br />
dist,ributlon was derernineci after tìie cracked rvheat cliet<br />
was peJ-leted. .4. 250 gran sarnple was -uaÌ;en, steaaed througìr<br />
t'horoughly untir disintegration occurred., dried ancÌ sieved.
ÎABLE 36. Particle size distribution of finely ground and<br />
eracked r.rheat and of the Íleal digestá derived<br />
thereof.<br />
PRE.PROCESSTNG FTNEIT GROUND<br />
PARTTCI,,E<br />
DTSTRTBUTIOñ ølJ<br />
>2.00<br />
1.00 to 2.00 n¡r<br />
0.50 to I.OO nn<br />
0.25 to 0.50 nn<br />
0.L25 to O;25 nm<br />
There were no significant dlfferences betv;een the<br />
apparent faecal anino acid availabilities, total ni-trogen<br />
and dry metter digestibilities fron finer-y ground and cracked<br />
'¡¡heat (Table 32; Appendix, Table 26). l,iith the excepiion<br />
of Ì'ET, GLU, SE^Þ. and PRO, the apparent ileal availabilities<br />
of ar¿ino acids ruere significantly higher .for ground than<br />
for cracked wheat. The ilea1 availabilities of tïS of<br />
ground anci cracked wheat were 81 .5 and 72.6/, respectively.<br />
'v/ith the exception of iiIS, THR, ASp, cliJ, CLy,<br />
108<br />
and PRO, iì-ea1 amino acid availabilities were not significantll/<br />
different from faecal availabilities for ground. wheat. The<br />
ireal amino acid avairabiriti-es from cracked wheat were arr<br />
significantly lower than their faecal availabilities<br />
(Table 37 ) .<br />
The individual apparent 1leal and faecal ar¿ino acid<br />
avaiLabilities, in addition to nitrogen and. dry rîatter<br />
d i6e sti-bilitie s and average daily dry aatter intake fronr the<br />
pi.gs feC cracl
TABIE 37. Apparent ilea1 and faecal anlno acid<br />
availabllities of ground ana craòlcãã<br />
r'rheat for study l¡b .<br />
DIET GROTND WHEAT CSACKED IfITEAT<br />
IOTATION FAECES<br />
ai¡tti2AclÐs<br />
Essential<br />
- ÃñE-<br />
Hrs<br />
ÏTE<br />
lEu<br />
tÏs<br />
TtrT3<br />
PIIE<br />
TIIR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
AÏ,4<br />
Àsp<br />
GLI¡<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÌ?<br />
NITBOGEN (ø)<br />
DRT MATTEB (ø)<br />
L<br />
2<br />
92.04 9r).4Â<br />
91.18 94.ÀA<br />
9o.zà gL.2L<br />
gL.sA g2.g^<br />
81.54 85 3A<br />
8d.oAB Bd.9À<br />
92.* %.5A<br />
8j.78 BB.7A<br />
d8.64 91.34<br />
82.La 8?.14<br />
82.88 B?.14<br />
gS jB g?.àL<br />
i]-.zB 9o.rA<br />
Él*.¡B 91¡.gA<br />
gB.2AB %JA<br />
89,84 9o.7A<br />
88.48 %.LL<br />
É0.4n 88.84<br />
Standard error of the nean.<br />
86.5c<br />
È5.?c<br />
85.68<br />
È?.68<br />
?2.68<br />
63.68<br />
89.48<br />
78. Oc<br />
83. r.B<br />
7\.58<br />
77 Jc<br />
94.18<br />
74.Lc<br />
83.88<br />
è4.?B<br />
85':B<br />
âtr.zc<br />
76!8c<br />
a-1<br />
¡Jx<br />
109<br />
%.94 o.6L5<br />
%.94 o.i57<br />
89.94 o.zz5<br />
gl.LA o. :>St<br />
d3.84 1.842<br />
89.óA L.zLg<br />
92.94 o.t+25<br />
87 JÃ 1.05,+<br />
go.jA 0,782<br />
86.5L r.5r5<br />
8ó.24 1.045<br />
gz.6A 0.53L<br />
89.84 o.g7g<br />
96JL t.6t+t+<br />
goJ[ L.L56<br />
90.6Ã 0.609<br />
92åà o.uzz<br />
88.84 o.4oo<br />
Means -in the same row wlth the san¡e superscript do not differ<br />
significantly (P
STiTnr¡ t<br />
ÐTSCUSSTC}JI<br />
The experinent on the cannulated pi_gs (study 2a) was<br />
carried out during the spring and sun¡:e r oî A9?L. ihe experi_<br />
nent on the normal pigs (study 2b) was carried out during the<br />
sunmer and fall of LgTl+.<br />
CannulatÍon did not seem to affect the apparent faecal<br />
anino acfd availabilities of pigs fed barle1,, corn or wheat. <strong>fn</strong><br />
general , the apparent availebilities tended to be slightly higher<br />
for the cannulated than for the nornal pigs (Table lg). The<br />
largest differences were found for the a'lino aciid availabilities<br />
from barley.<br />
ln addition to the insignificant effect of cannul_ation<br />
on apparent faecar a¡äino acid. availabiriti.e s , the results obtained<br />
show the reproducibility of the faecal analysis method.<br />
Faecal collections from the cannulated pigs fed the<br />
l"i-7 diet following the cereal test diet sequence were lost.<br />
The iI-14 diet was only fed to the cannulated pigs following the<br />
cereaL test diet sequence. Consequently, a conparíson between<br />
the metabolic faecal anino acid excretion between the cannur-ated<br />
and normal pigs coulci on11' ¡" n:ade for ì;-Z fed prior to the<br />
cereal test diet sequence and for I-r4 fed foll0wing the cerear.<br />
test diet secuence.<br />
lThe studies are<br />
studi¡ 2r stud;' 4, study discussed in the followj.ng secuence:<br />
3 aad study 1,<br />
1l_c
TABLE 38. Comparisons<br />
-9f appgy,eqt faecaL amino acfd<br />
dry<br />
availabilitles,<br />
narrer.<br />
nitrogen and<br />
digesribiliries berween cannurareã-ãñ¿ ñormai'pü;-iãã- -<br />
corn, wheat and barley.<br />
CEREAL CRATN<br />
AMrNo ACIDS (ø)<br />
EssentÍa1<br />
ARG<br />
HTS<br />
IÏE<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NrTnocEN (ø)<br />
DAT MATTEB (ø)<br />
2a<br />
92.2<br />
93.6<br />
88.1<br />
93.8<br />
83.0<br />
9L.3<br />
86.3<br />
88.2<br />
90.8<br />
86.6<br />
9b.L<br />
86.2<br />
93. t+<br />
91. O<br />
90.2<br />
89.1+<br />
89.4<br />
CORN<br />
9L.2<br />
92.b<br />
87.8<br />
93.6<br />
8r..8<br />
9L.2<br />
85.9<br />
87.7<br />
90.2<br />
86.0<br />
93.8<br />
86.o<br />
93,t+<br />
90.6<br />
90.0<br />
88.5<br />
69.0<br />
¿1<br />
1.0<br />
1.2<br />
0.3<br />
o.2<br />
1.2<br />
0.1<br />
0. tÞ<br />
o.5<br />
0.6<br />
o.6<br />
o.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.0<br />
0. r+<br />
o.2<br />
0.9<br />
o. Il<br />
VIHEAT<br />
92.7 92.L gtr.9 9À.r<br />
89.À 88.9<br />
9L.5 9L.2<br />
80.7 ?9.9<br />
92.5 92.6<br />
86,7 86. r<br />
88.9 88.6<br />
8l*.0 â3.3<br />
63.1 82.6<br />
97.o 97.0<br />
89.3 88.9<br />
96.7 9T.o<br />
92,5 92.L<br />
89.5 È9.5<br />
9L.2 9r.1<br />
69.0 68.,<br />
colu¡nns 4l B an4 C lndicate the difference in percentage units between the faecal<br />
anino acid avaiLabil-ities from cannulared ana äon-cãnffii.Ëd pie"-iõ"-"ã"i,-iñà"t<br />
and barley respectiveLy. .<br />
sl<br />
0.6<br />
o.8<br />
0,5<br />
0.3<br />
0.8<br />
-0.1<br />
0.6<br />
0.3<br />
o.7<br />
o,5<br />
o.o<br />
0.l}<br />
-0.3<br />
0.I<br />
0.o<br />
o.t<br />
o.5<br />
BARLEY<br />
cL<br />
89.b 87.t+ z.o<br />
9L.9 8?.ê tÌ.t<br />
83.1 ?9.5 3.6<br />
86.6 8+.r 2.5<br />
77.5 73.5 ,l¡.0<br />
87.9 86.2 L.?<br />
81.r+ ?8.3 3.L<br />
8t+.3 8L.1 3.2<br />
77,4 7t+.8 2.6<br />
77.9 7t+.6 3.3<br />
92.7 9r. l} ]..3<br />
82,6 79.8 2.8<br />
92.3 9r.r L.2<br />
86.9 8r+.3 2.6<br />
85.0 82.5 2.5<br />
8j.9 82.o 3.9<br />
83.6 81.8 r.8<br />
H<br />
P<br />
ts
There seeäred -,o be substantial d.i.fferences betl./een<br />
r-he xnetabolic faecal_ aniino acid excretion f:.on nornal_ anci<br />
cannulatecÌ piSs (Table 19). -{ closer look at the indiviCuat<br />
data obt,ained si:olved iliat the ¡:etabolic .faecal a¡rino acid<br />
excretions fron pig nunber l- fed eit,he r ì.:_7 or i.._lL .r¿¡ere<br />
considerabL;r higher than ihose obtained Íron the othe:. pi¿_s<br />
(ilppendix, Tab]e lO). This cig was alwa;is ve¡l¡ pronê to<br />
blockage v¡hich resul_ted in a re"y Iow dietar¡r intake<br />
(.'tppendÍx, Table 9 ) of the ì.-? and ì--I+ diets and in er(cessive<br />
lcakage at tines. Proper dieta:,¡. eauilibr"ation wit,h respect<br />
to the r:aintenance diets had probably not taken pJ_ace ai<br />
t,he t'i¡i:e the faeces v,,ere cc't l-ec-ueC. Tn other lrc:.Cs, the<br />
íaeces that '¡¡ere collecteci na;, have ccn,r,ained undJ-ge sted<br />
residues of the pig gl'ower ration that uas fed pr.ior io -r,he<br />
feeding of the ì.;-7 and i--ld diets. ùIoser agreenenr- betr,yeen<br />
ihe netabolic faecal ar:ino acid excietion fro;r nornal anC<br />
cannulated pigs vrere obiained v¡hen the daia fron pig nunber<br />
I were e:
113<br />
TABLE 39. Conparisons of the.,metabolic faecal anino acid and<br />
nitrogen excretionl between study 2a .nã-Z¡.-- -<br />
LEWL OF<br />
ArPEArr,oc (ø)<br />
A¡ÍINO ACIDS<br />
EssentÍa1<br />
-Tm'-<br />
HTS<br />
TLE<br />
T,EiT<br />
f,TS.<br />
METJ<br />
PEE<br />
THR<br />
VAI<br />
ASP<br />
GLI'<br />
GLÏ<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
I{ITROGEN<br />
.o29<br />
.oar<br />
.o33<br />
.or0<br />
.o+e<br />
.016<br />
.031<br />
.03l+<br />
.038<br />
2a<br />
.o24<br />
.010<br />
.030<br />
.o43<br />
.o4o<br />
.014<br />
.o27<br />
. o3o<br />
.O3l+<br />
.046 (.041)<br />
.o72 (.o6L)<br />
.095 (.086)<br />
.038 (.033)<br />
.039 (.033)<br />
.o37 (.O3Ll<br />
.o23 (,0201<br />
.022<br />
.008<br />
.o27<br />
.o33 'oltt<br />
.012<br />
.o25<br />
.o29<br />
.o32<br />
.0lro<br />
.062<br />
.080<br />
.o32<br />
.a3z<br />
.03l+<br />
.o19<br />
.032<br />
.015<br />
.044<br />
.068<br />
.o57<br />
.020<br />
.041<br />
.ou7<br />
.051<br />
2a<br />
.030)<br />
.01rù)<br />
.o39)<br />
.o57)<br />
.0119 )<br />
.017)<br />
.034 )<br />
.0r+0)<br />
.044)<br />
.063 (.05r+)<br />
.o9r¡ (.083)<br />
.125 (.111)<br />
.05o (.or$2)<br />
.oó7 (.058)<br />
.050 ( .0r+5 )<br />
.o3o (.025t<br />
14<br />
2 .oz6<br />
.012<br />
.038<br />
.054<br />
.0t1,<br />
.o20<br />
.031<br />
.038<br />
'ol+5<br />
.o53<br />
.088<br />
.LLz<br />
.ot+o<br />
.040<br />
.0l}4<br />
.o23<br />
.L44 (.r29) .118 .t93 (.L67) .L75<br />
I E*p"""""d. as grams per 100 gran dry nåtter intake.<br />
2 val,r"" in parentheses exclude d.ata obtained from pig nurber 1.<br />
3 Determined by acÍd hydrolysis.
should be taken into account during the formulation of<br />
die*.,ary arnino acid leveLs in order to neet the requirements<br />
for optirnun Ì"esponse.<br />
The apparent availabilities of LïS especially<br />
and those of THR, ÌET and TRy of cereal grains are of<br />
practical impor-r,ance. .4s was mentj_oned previouslT, the<br />
nethod used for TRy analysis did. not yield accurate<br />
dupJ-ications.<br />
0n1y sraall differences were found between the<br />
apparent ileal and faecal anino acid availabiliiies for iïS<br />
and i'¡Eî from eoi'n, wheat and barleir ( Tab1e 40 ) . f,he dif_<br />
ference betlveen ileal and. faecal iiS availabilities were<br />
1.0, 4.0 and t+.21i for corn, wheat and barley respectively.<br />
Ïn the same order, these d.ifferences were 2.1¡, 2.3 and O.5i.!<br />
for lET.<br />
¡rl1- f^^^^'<br />
,,..o "aecaL analysis nethod night overestinxete the<br />
actual availabili-r,y of TIJR. The difference between iLeal<br />
and faecal THi, availabilities l,¡ere 7 ,Lt, LO.2 and 10.2!å for<br />
corn, wheat and barley respectively. overestimation of TFiR<br />
by the faeca] analysis r¡rethod v¡ould occur if Tlin were sub_<br />
jected to nicrobial_ fermentation by the flora in the large<br />
i,ntestine .<br />
the differences bê-r,ween apparen-r, faecal and ileal<br />
amino acid availabilities of the other essentiar- a¡cino acicÌs<br />
114
TABLE<br />
'+0.<br />
ApparÊnt rleal and faecal aÍ¡ino acid avarr.abir-ltr es, in additron to nrtrogen,<br />
d¡v na*e., srarch and crude riber ar!.ãliuurtrãs årã'-tlrã-ãi3ãipËã"äiå" or<br />
these substances Ín the targe <strong>fn</strong>testiñã. ----<br />
Essentla].<br />
-Eq- 87.1 s?.2<br />
!I! 88.3 e3.6<br />
rLE 8T.S ¿ìB.l<br />
IEll 92,5 93.8<br />
LIl" 82.0 83.0<br />
I.4ET,/ 01 o 49 .5<br />
PHE 90.í òr.r<br />
ry 78.9 86.3<br />
vAL 8,r.9 g8.z<br />
Non-Essentlel<br />
-TrÃ-_---_ 88.5 90.8<br />
ASP, $.9 ¡}6.6<br />
qx , 82.L 9O.2<br />
8lV 7I:2 Zt:L<br />
PRo 8o,r+ sER 9j.L eu.9<br />
TfR<br />
ii.o<br />
89.O 9O.2<br />
¡¡1noqp¡'r tØ1.. 92." 8e.4<br />
lRT MArTqB, (ø) 8o.2 ¿S.rr<br />
qT4lqH (ø)& .,.< e8.2 s9.9<br />
CRUDE FTBEn |y'"|, L.2 ii.i<br />
2<br />
3<br />
5<br />
CEREAL CRAIN<br />
LOCÂTTON<br />
rLEUM FÂEcEs ¿.t.1 62<br />
37.5<br />
l+6,7<br />
6.6<br />
L7.2<br />
4.9<br />
-29,L<br />
6.L<br />
35 .r<br />
2L.7<br />
-4.8 85,8<br />
-5.3 89.!.<br />
-o.6 85,3<br />
-L,3 86.9<br />
-1.O 75.7<br />
+2.4 8ó.6<br />
-0.8 88.8<br />
-7.t+ 76,5<br />
-3.3 82.8<br />
I'IHEÂT<br />
rtEUM FAEcEs ¡,.r,1 A,<br />
*,i ;íti 7t!.2 -1r.0 B6.d fa,i Ai,i 96.? iL.9<br />
ts,ç<br />
,,\.ç -6.r g¡,.r gz.b tj:i _6:i =e:ó<br />
e.3 -L.z B5.e eg.i Li.6 _t.¿<br />
2?.\ -7.o 82.9 9r.2 4d.3 _8.3<br />
\9.2 -?.? 7i.3 de.Q id.á -ti.í<br />
II,EUM FÂECES [.I.1 A 2<br />
"î:8 i3:ï ti:i :u,:'n<br />
89.4 26.2 -l,r 7'<br />
9L.5 gl*Z 35,4 -t,.6 6: n:, :r,:i<br />
cg.z zo.s -4.o 22.? 27.2 ti:i _L.z<br />
9C.? 17.4 -2.3 C9.! 7i.e *ö.¡<br />
2?.2 33.3 -3.T g?.? qi.i =i.i tl.á _\.2<br />
å3:l \t:2 -13:í ià:3 ål:l *:Z -!Z:i<br />
73:', -;à:3 '3:å ZZ.2 27:L -;t:Z<br />
Digestlbttlties in thè ¡.arge intestine<br />
Differ€nces Differences ln percentaje ncr"centqc¡ inits úñt+e between hÂ+-, ^ faecal and irear estlî¡ates.<br />
Deteflnined by the oxidatlon<br />
.nethod. 4<br />
dlgesta fron<br />
For the deterrnlnation<br />
rhe 2 pigs' fed<br />
of starch<br />
the<br />
dlgestibillties<br />
iáme aièã- aüi:irË-åã'"il'particular tesr period, -iõõi"a.<br />
were poo<br />
"ê<br />
I::,tlî-9"t,:,:T:n::1g1"of crude flber disesriblri;fes disesta fron 6 piss rea th" test dlet, v¡ere pooLed.<br />
".r"<br />
.¿tl<br />
g?.7 77.\ 25.3 _7.?<br />
'!!.V 7Z.e 23.0 _6.i<br />
77.9 ie.z +s.e<br />
99.9 22.7. bj.e -u.i _6.r<br />
7\'? 9?.9 jQ.o -n.[<br />
+sti ',Êtâ 'titt, tll:l<br />
7\.9 85.9 ,+3.7 _11.0<br />
a?'â frf iï,i .i,'i<br />
F<br />
P
varied from O.87c for PHx to 5,3ii for äIS from corn, fron<br />
3.li,i, for Pi{it to 6.Víà for ARG from wheat and from /¡.0f5 for<br />
fLE to ]",L5,4' for HrS fro¡: barley.<br />
116<br />
Generally, there lJas an i-ncreased net disappearance<br />
of amino acids in the large intestine fron corn to v¡heat to<br />
barley. Total nitrogen, drl' matter anci starch but not crude<br />
fiber follo¡¡ed the sa¡ne relationship (Tab1e 40).<br />
For all the cereal grains tested., certain anino<br />
acids alvrays disappeared to the targest extent. These a¡nino<br />
acids were AB,G, HïS, THR, CTS, GLU, GLy, pRO and SEñ, (Table<br />
40). The net disappearance of nost of these amino acids was<br />
also extensive in the large intestine of the pigs r.,,hen these<br />
wei'e fed the maintenance or piotein-free dj_ets (Table 2t+ and.<br />
35), lïowever, these observations do not necessaril]r mean<br />
that the micro-organisms of the large intestine are mainlr,<br />
active on the netabolic amino acids present in di¿esta frcn<br />
pigs fed cereal grains. These observati-ons coulci sin:p}l/ nean<br />
that the flora has a particular affinity for the degradation<br />
of particular amino acids. 0n the other hand, a type of flora<br />
ma¡'.have established itself in the large intestíne of the<br />
pig with a dependence on endogeneous substrates. Endogeneous<br />
substrates are a consistent and fairly constant source of<br />
potentiar nutrients for ihe flora throughout the life span of
A l_imited amount of comparative data are available<br />
and are shown in labIe 41 . The ileal availability estimates<br />
of amino acids obtained by Easter (L973) fro¡e corn were nuch<br />
T17<br />
lower than those obtained i-n this study. Faecal avairab ities<br />
were al_so lower but to a lesser extent. The cotlection pro_<br />
cedure employed by Easter was different than ihat used in this<br />
study. <strong>fn</strong> Easterrs study, ileal digesta r4ras collected for<br />
each minute of a 24 hour day over a 5 day period. Fifteen<br />
eouall5r spaced coll-ections of 96 minutes durati.on were obtained.<br />
lhe collection procedure used ciid not pernit the deterroination<br />
of iteal amino acid avaítabilities on the basis of total aníno<br />
acid intake, ånd tota] anounts of amino acids passing through<br />
the end of the ileunr. Easterrs estj.mates are based only on<br />
the rel-ative chrornic oxide content of feed. and digesta and give<br />
no indication of 'r,he total amount of chroni.c oxide recoveï'ed<br />
from ileal digesta. The experiments carried out in this stud.y<br />
allowed for the deternination of ireal amino acid avairabiÌities<br />
by both total collection anci chronic oxid.e revers. Ðei:er¡ninations<br />
b1' both meùhods were found to give nearly sirnirar Ílear ava -<br />
ability estimates for the cereal grains, indi.cating total<br />
recoverl¡ of chromíc oxide fro¡:r i1eaI digesta (Table 23).<br />
Easter did not return any of the i1eal d!.gesta that<br />
was coLlected from the ilear cannura back into the aninar vÍa
TABLE<br />
CEREAL GRATN<br />
LOCATTON<br />
TìEFERENCE<br />
'+1. Comparison of apparent ilea1 -and faecal amlno acid availabilities from<br />
corn and barLey as obtained from dlfferent-rã¡ðratories.<br />
AMrNo ACIDS (%)<br />
Essential<br />
ARG<br />
Hrs<br />
TT,E<br />
LEU<br />
LÏS<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Bss entlal<br />
---ÃTT--_-<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÏR<br />
rI,EUI,Í<br />
A1<br />
73.O<br />
77.1¡<br />
68.4<br />
76.8<br />
6tr.t<br />
73.8<br />
73.2<br />
61.r<br />
69.7<br />
FAECES<br />
¡l<br />
ILEUM<br />
B2<br />
È7.t+ 88.o<br />
88.3 9o.7<br />
87.5 83.tù<br />
92.5 88.5<br />
82.0 81.2<br />
9L.9 9s.t<br />
90.5 85 .7<br />
78.9 80.8<br />
8tr.9 8j.3<br />
83.9 80.9<br />
91.8 90. t+<br />
7L.2 78.3<br />
8O.rÌ 9z.L<br />
Ê8. ¡ 83.8<br />
8t1,9 86.6<br />
89. o 86.7<br />
1 R"fu"un.e A indicates Easter (Lg?Ð.<br />
c<br />
Reference B indicates data from this study.<br />
3<br />
67.2<br />
4.6<br />
77.8<br />
50.1<br />
76.O<br />
7L.L<br />
76.5<br />
Reference C indicates Zdbrowska (L973 a, bl ,<br />
FAECES<br />
B2<br />
92.2<br />
93.6<br />
88.1<br />
93.8<br />
83.0<br />
89.5<br />
9t,3<br />
86.3<br />
86. 2<br />
90.8<br />
86.6<br />
9l+.L<br />
È6.2<br />
93.t+<br />
91.0<br />
90.2<br />
TI,EUM<br />
92<br />
81.5<br />
80.rr<br />
79.L<br />
8L.5<br />
73.3<br />
80.4<br />
82.2<br />
7L.2<br />
78. o<br />
69.7<br />
7L.2<br />
86.6<br />
7L.2<br />
80.9<br />
?6.3<br />
79.7<br />
BARIET<br />
II,EUM<br />
ç3<br />
82.O<br />
75.O<br />
77.O<br />
7È.O<br />
70.a<br />
80.0<br />
67.o<br />
75.O<br />
68.0<br />
75.0<br />
8l*. o<br />
80. o<br />
83. o<br />
72.O<br />
78.O<br />
H<br />
ts<br />
@.
th.e caecal- cannula. Fhil_l:pson (]-g52) Ín stuCies vrith sheec<br />
fcund that ihe e.r:ount of i.uccenal .digest: rêturnêd tc -,he<br />
ì: si:'l ^1-ì.r.ì = ,¡-:. = ¡n-rq: i¡. ¡,^:<br />
_c.-.¡!u_L-: :.¿u u. vv_.r-<br />
=rr<br />
uC.- O:ì ti.ê f:cv¡ cj<br />
i j-:e ste Ír-cr the prorriilel cennufå. ,,hen nc di-ge sta. ,,ra s<br />
l e turned withln er,ren oÌle hour, tce fiow rate ,,¡/e s inci.eeseC<br />
bl. 7C',''. .i:: i::::-ees= :n iioi.; r:.¡e a'ccv: the :lcri:ef -lìow rate<br />
et the e n,l cf the ileun (r.rhich ccurd ha.".e cccui.Ì.ei in ¡a s*.e:. I s<br />
studies ) :ra;' ¡¿i'. resul-teci in a decrease in protein ci3astl_<br />
'rilit;' a''d,far anino acid :bsci.ptlon ani ther:fcre l-cr.;e:, ifeaf<br />
:ri::o eci.i avail:.h:Iit:es.<br />
-rn gsneral , the ilea1 ar:.:ino acii ar,.ai1aÌ:ilitie s<br />
c'cteineC b;- I3'..rcirsk ¿ (L97) a , ': ) for barie;- coî.pêr3 r.e r;. yell<br />
lvi*,h thos: obtained j-n this study (ïabte 4t ) . Tj-_ e data obtalne
L2A<br />
TABLE 42. The disappearancelof arnino a<br />
starch aåd. crude fiber in .¡!ilã¡r3.lliå5ii"3ï narter,<br />
CEREAL GRATN CORTV .I,I¡I{EAT<br />
AtrtrNO ACIDS<br />
Ess ential<br />
--rrõT-<br />
HIS<br />
ILE<br />
LEl'<br />
LÏS^<br />
MET¿<br />
PITE<br />
TFN<br />
VAT,<br />
effii*=de<br />
ASP,<br />
crs'<br />
olu<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TTR<br />
NITROGEIq<br />
DRÏ MATTER<br />
STARCH<br />
CAUDE FTBER<br />
1<br />
t<br />
.o2L<br />
.01À<br />
.003<br />
.oL7<br />
.003^<br />
+.oo6t<br />
.003<br />
.o27<br />
.ol-5<br />
9.<br />
1.<br />
1.<br />
018<br />
0L9<br />
016<br />
0tl3<br />
07l+<br />
L65<br />
03z<br />
004<br />
L36<br />
2<br />
10<br />
23<br />
.040<br />
.017<br />
.oL7<br />
.ol+5<br />
.018<br />
.005<br />
.025<br />
.040<br />
.034<br />
.049<br />
.053<br />
.oatt<br />
.191<br />
.088<br />
.L43<br />
.05¿l<br />
. o1t+<br />
.2L5<br />
L5.7<br />
4.L6<br />
o.57<br />
BARIET<br />
. 0à6<br />
.o25<br />
.016<br />
'ol+3<br />
.oL7^<br />
+.001J<br />
.o3L<br />
.o39<br />
.035<br />
.03?<br />
.02b<br />
'oua<br />
.180<br />
.084<br />
.138<br />
.053<br />
.019<br />
.21+l+<br />
L7.4<br />
5.01<br />
L.39<br />
Expressed as gra'ns per ro0 grans of dly natter Íntake.<br />
Dete:srined by the oridation method.<br />
Plus s5'gn indicates an increase Ín the quantrty of amÍno aci.ds<br />
fron the énd of the ileum to.tñ"-î"ãËã".
ia111. Cisalpeâranc.r in the ia:"¡= in*":stj.ne ci 1,he pa:.ticuiar.<br />
¡rrf¡ian;c<br />
.A,1though this obser.t ation could .le ccinciientaJ_,<br />
the inc:.ease iu st,aich i isappear.a,nce frcÌ,i cot n t o rrheet _1 c<br />
L:'r..'-r. !..r !çJ in _Li.r +l¡^ (.¿i- r¿,¡.:e I-'.-^ intestlne r.;a s Cirectf .¡ proporticnal tc<br />
toi:al niti.co"rl ai..pp"êi.ance it on these cereaf -qiains in th:<br />
_:.-¡_! I ::-r-c ri-!-_,ru4:r=. i he-d+i F^ 'j ;:.jroI,,s:s in the :"u:en tekes piace Lhi.cugh<br />
p=ptides c-f d¿creasing chain leng;th to f:.ee aninc aciCs.<br />
Ìhese free ailino ecj-iis are ÍinalLi, degradsd to ar:nonie end<br />
shcrt-chain fat-u;. ¿s1¿.. ?:,esunabJ_i,, this tl.pe c.f bacterial_<br />
h;.ârc1;-'sls elsc tâl.i3s place ín ihc câecur;1. ?l:e exteni. cf<br />
bacter-i al- hl.Crc1,.sis cí unCige si.eC e xc3ene ous and/c:. enCc_<br />
Ê'3necu_s pro-1.ein will iepenC cn the ancunt of cnerg;. th.et :s<br />
a.¡aila.ble to the nicr.oílcre, cí i-lhe larg: inte stine .<br />
llcr": undigestible star-ch fi,on barl_e¡. ct" Irhcât thê.n<br />
îi'on ccrn 3nters the large intesti,ne and is avai iai-.ie tc the<br />
nic:.oflcra (îabi.e 4C anci L2 ) . -ll. s e. ccnsec',tence , rel-at ir¡elj.<br />
nore bacieriaì- h¡.'drol;'sls cí undiSe sted prctsia v¡.i 11 .ùai:e pr_ace<br />
r.'h.¡ .,¡¡-r: L.þl !:ir_r" ^:¡ ^e ui ,,L^^+ ...,i.cac. rather ihar: corn, is îl: â:lc. â :elå:i7el,,<br />
]-arger proCuction cf anncnie and shcrt-cj:ain jait-¡ âciCs t¡ili<br />
re sult. -1. r:i.opoi"ticn of the annonia prcCuceC in -,he j-ar.3e in_<br />
te stlne lsill r:e abscrbed. ¡.s the anouni pi.oC:rcei increases,<br />
e.bScr¡ticn l"li I ] --^i¿' J_¡, aisO increa se . ,1.t the sane t i:le , rr,ith<br />
i"nci'ease in es::onla a'csorption, a picpcr.ti.cn cf the inci.ease ir<br />
qn:o:ì.1: p:c.j'_tc:J ',vi11 'ce :ss::ii-ateC -c;. tì..e ::lc:c_or-¡-¿;:isi:s.<br />
12i
The :.efc¡.:, c::e -,.rcuJ-C elsc izre3t :_-.c r. e ;l.i.c:.o'ciai_ prci:J-:: s¡-n_<br />
i?2<br />
tle sis in the Iarq_^ lnte sti-ne ¡¡ihen barr c., cr ',,.;l: e ¿ t is fed anC<br />
tlls s!^.culd b+ refl=ctad 'c'¡ :e lativel;, higher I:ve_s c.f J.¡. p.l. in<br />
the f aec=s fron bar1e.,' and vrh=at than frct corn. lio,¡rever,<br />
it should be ke¡t ín i::ind that ¿s the nccro-or¡:anisns norre<br />
Ccwn the lar.se intestine, nart cf tl"ese r,^ríl1 under,grc<br />
autslygls, presuneblJ¡ prcDorticnar to their nunbei , Annonia<br />
s:ens tc be the nejcr end p:.cduct cl Ce¡ir.aCaticn of :icrcbia.l<br />
prctein and is a.bscrbed (l_ichel , \966\. The le.,¡els of DAFÄ<br />
in the faeces r¡tere n'Ìee surec but the :'er.rccucibilit¡¡ of r.esults<br />
r¡¡a s pcor and thereÍcr.e did not r/úarrânt intercretation.<br />
!iqepcç:renc.e cl starch anC crucie<br />
rlceY' Ln tne let"F.e intêstine.<br />
-1. substant ie1 ânount of starch fr.c¡r r¡heat and barl_ev<br />
Cisapnear.ed in the larse intestine, nanel:, l+.L6 and 5.Ol<br />
grens respe ctivel¡.. (Ta¡te ¿Z). lhese val_ues correspcnd +.c<br />
5.? and 7.8Í of the tctar. cieter'¡ starch f.cn r,¡heat ani ,oarLe-,<br />
re spectivel: (Tal:1e 4C). Jor. ccrn, star.ch dig:sticn 1,^ra s<br />
neerl" complete b.'' the :nC of the snal_l intestine. lnlir l.l-9<br />
grans, co¡'respondins to l_ .71, of tlie total díetar.., intake .<br />
-<br />
díserpear.eC in the Large iniestine (:eble !,C and L2),<br />
!,olr:es et å1 , (L9?)) alsc founC starch dÍg:estion frcm ccrn tc<br />
be r:+arI'.' conpl:te 1..,' the _^nd of tl^.e snel_l i::t:st lne . I:: rf,is<br />
stud.; ccnilete dl.qesticn of sta:-ch rças fou_nd 'c-.- the faecai<br />
en¿l -¡sis ne-uhcC (la¡ie ¿C ) .
ff the ¡3r"rinin. cfql"^h cni---i¡c the Iars_. intestine<br />
r^jê s fei'nented Ín t!^e se:lc renne t- es in Ì.un€n ferr:entation.<br />
then l-31' of t¡ê +nerr:' '¿:o'.:1: ':: îîn\.?rt --d i::t: 'î:ct :t i=1 csll-<br />
ì:crìie s . 15i Ncr-lld 'ce lost as heat ¡'.nC ne thane an¿ 7 5:t .l¡culi fte<br />
abscr'red as vclatile fatt-.' a.ciCs. liolatíIe f:t-Ll- acids :re<br />
utilized wi'uh about 65í o-i the eíiicienc)¡ cf carbch,¡irates.<br />
The net j'ield to the ani_;lal_ of the energl¡ disappeering in<br />
the iar'ge in-te stine Ís then ê tu;"L of ¿rucose ec.ì.i ïâìents<br />
(iìctnes et ai. , 1973) . The ectuei âr.ou.nts oÍ en=rgi. icst îr.cn<br />
starch tc iìie ¿ninaL fro;: corn, wheet and barieir -wcuto then<br />
aaa<br />
'oe C.Ll', L.5C", end I.3C¿ gr::s per IOC gra;,-.s oî Crr- ;la*;ter<br />
int ake re spectivell¡.<br />
Po-uent iatl¡i, the flcra cf the large inte stine ne;,,<br />
plai,- e. role in naking unCi6:estible câ^rboh)¡ûrate ¡veii:bia tc<br />
the ani.nal as vola.tile íati;. aciis. The lâi,ter nâJ¡ be ci<br />
scne ì.mporiance to the enínal when wheat or oariei, is feC.<br />
The total a.Ícunt oí Cisappear¡nce ci crucÌe fiber<br />
frcn the cereei gr-ains in the ì_arge intesti.ne iid not foliow<br />
the seme rela'uicnship as that oí star.ch frcä corn, wheat ani<br />
L t -: < i't ^¡<br />
a- _ -<br />
- .i: /r^^\<br />
x.)/!.tul = C4,i.<br />
(me ) ìl=ee -- -'--i<br />
(6t' x5.cL) =I.90.<br />
(rcõ )<br />
'. )1<br />
(64 xr.lZ) =C.43;t".L(:-(5.t* xt,.Lê) =i.5C:
arley. i;heat and corn used. in this expei.irr-ient had approxi_<br />
mately the qane crude fiber content but relatively nore cru.de<br />
fiber disappeareC from corn in the large intestine than fronr<br />
wheat (Teble 40). Ðue to the relatively low anount o.f sterch<br />
r24<br />
fro¡n corn entering the large intesti.ne, the .flora mal/ have had<br />
to obtaín relatively nore energy from the crude fiber fraction.<br />
The distribution o.f particle size of the cereal grain<br />
diets and the ileal dìgesta derived fron the cereal grains are<br />
shown in Tab1e 43. the percentages of particles larger than<br />
1.00 mrr were 37.7, ?9.8 and 6t.9fl for the corn, wheat anci<br />
barley diets respectively. Tn the same order they were ì2.!,<br />
3 5 .t+ and, 27 .5i:; f or i1eal digesta from corn, r,;heat anC barley.<br />
The fractions larger than 1.00 mn were found to<br />
contain unriigested cracked grain particles and fíbrous nateriai.<br />
the higher percentages of 1arger pariicJ.es in i1eal d.igesta<br />
from v¡heat and barlel/ than from corn reflect the dietary par-<br />
ticre size distribution of these grains. Higher ileal anrino<br />
ac'id avaiLabilities and starch digestibilities na1, possibl_j¡<br />
have been obtained, fro¡r wheat and barley if these grains had<br />
been ground through a finer screen before they vrere rnade into<br />
pellets (page t*6 ) .)<br />
the inplications of the effect of size of grinding
TABT,E ,+3. the dlstribution of partícle size of the cereal grain diets .and of<br />
the íLeaL digesta deiived fron each diet.<br />
CEREAT., GRATN<br />
PARTICI.,E<br />
DISTRTBI'TTON<br />
)2.00 nn<br />
1.00 to 2.00 r¡m<br />
.50 tô 1.00 mn<br />
.25 to .50 nn<br />
.125 to .25 nn<br />
T<br />
2<br />
on i1eal amino acid availabilities were not realized prior<br />
to the sta:'t of this experi.nent and the effect of dietar;,<br />
particle size distribution v¡as reexarnined in raore detair in<br />
studt' 4b.<br />
A certain degree of fractionation of the ingested<br />
dletarl' conponents v¡ilI take place during stonrach enptyÍng.<br />
îhis in turn will determine the uniformity of flor,,¡ ancl<br />
conposition of digesta through the end of the ileu¡n. lhe<br />
anount of fractionation of digesta by the stonach will be<br />
influenced by the particle size distribu.tÍon of the diet. r¡<br />
these experi¡rents, particle size distribution rrra s largest for<br />
r26<br />
wheat and only minor differences in the amino acid conposition<br />
of ilea1 d.igesta f:"on .r,he individual B-hou:. collections v¡ere<br />
found (Îab1e 21 ). Therefore, it r^¡ou1d be safe to assune that<br />
the individual 8-hour corlections of i1ea1 digesta from corn<br />
and barley were also of a si¡ailar con:position,<br />
As was explained previously (pale 76 ), the rnetabolic<br />
ileal and faecal anrino acid leve1s in study 2 v{ere originalJ-y<br />
deter¡nined b¡r aid of the Ì,I-7 and l.Ì-14 diets. These diets<br />
contained 4É casein as the onl.v protein source.<br />
True faecal anrino acid availabilities frorn casein for<br />
ihe pig were found to be very close to IOO% (:egum , 1973). The
1 a,l<br />
avallabi.Iities cf the essentlel eriino aclCs, -,¡;1th the excepii-on<br />
oí lii of .¡hich t he availabi-iit¡.- was 95 . t*;, , rânged Erari 97 .g<br />
to 99.9i. Consecl,entl-¡r , ihe anino acicis in faeces coliecr.ed<br />
fro¡: oirs fed casein should Ì-.. e incii-cative of +.he ¡:etabolic<br />
faecal a:ino acil losses.<br />
Two na"intenance diet s v¡ere fcrrul:ted , nenìe1:' r,^,¡it h<br />
? and. L4Í alphafloc r.espectíve1_r'. Dietar¡r f iber level has<br />
been shown to affect tha ¡letabolic f¿ecal nitrcaen excretion<br />
in pigs and rats (I-.hn, fcSL; ite.r,.er, 1956; t,itchell , I95U;<br />
i'rhiting and Eezeau, 7957 a,b\. Therefore, it can be expected<br />
that díetar¡r fi'cer level- will also affect the netabolic<br />
faecal excretion oí the individual anino aci.cis.<br />
Ileal and feecal satrpl-es fror:: ì.-i fed to the cannulated<br />
pigs after ti^.e cereal test. diet sequence wer.e lost and the<br />
effect of body wêight on the netabolic il_eal and faecal anino<br />
acid levels could not be assesseci. Tl:e effect o.f rleigh-u<br />
on the netabolic faecal nitrogen anC anlno acirj l_evéls, when<br />
these were expressei es grens excreted per lCC grans of dr-lnatter<br />
intake, was fcund to be ver;; snell for the non-cannulated<br />
pigs in studj' 2b (iatte Zó). <strong>fn</strong> adciition, onl:¡ smal1 ciifferences<br />
due to weight of rats on the netabolic faecal_ enino âcid<br />
excretion were founci in st,uci.i. I (:eble 13 ) .<br />
ln the assunpticn that there ras no effect of weight on<br />
the netebolic ainino acid ani nitrogen Levels fcr the can-<br />
nulated pigs, raising the Cíetar;r alphaflcc level f:.on Z tc
1{f increased the r:retabolic ileal and faecal amino acÍd<br />
an
T¡,BLE ,+4. Leve1s of amino acids, total nitrogen and dry natter in il-ea1<br />
digesta and faeces fron the cannuLated pigs fed the rnaintenance dÍets.<br />
T,EVEL OF<br />
ATPHAFL0C (ø)<br />
AMINO ACTDS4<br />
Essential-<br />
--îrG-<br />
HTS<br />
TI,E<br />
I,EU<br />
LïSr<br />
MET.,<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAT.,<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NITROGEN<br />
DRY MAÎTER<br />
2<br />
3<br />
l+<br />
5<br />
.o33<br />
.012<br />
.o33<br />
.o39<br />
.o3r+<br />
.009<br />
.oz]-<br />
.OlrZ<br />
.036<br />
.040<br />
. 06r+<br />
.120<br />
.o97<br />
.3r4<br />
.065<br />
.ot7<br />
.201<br />
l3.25<br />
7T<br />
.o24 -.009<br />
.0Io -.0ø2<br />
.030 -.003<br />
.0r+3 +. oórr<br />
.040 +.006<br />
.011r. +.005<br />
.o27 +.006<br />
.030 -.00d<br />
.034 -.002<br />
.o4r<br />
.064<br />
.086<br />
.o33<br />
.o33<br />
.o3L<br />
.o23<br />
.L29<br />
8.65<br />
+.001<br />
.000<br />
- . o3r+<br />
-.o6t+<br />
-.28r<br />
-.031<br />
+.006<br />
-.o72<br />
-À.60<br />
.0116<br />
. oL8<br />
.036<br />
.044<br />
,o\2<br />
. olt<br />
,o23<br />
.ol+5<br />
.Ot z<br />
'o5o<br />
.o73<br />
'f.l+7<br />
.14d<br />
.576<br />
.078<br />
.018<br />
.306<br />
23.3L<br />
$-7-wqs -fed prlor to the cereaL test diet sequence, results from plg number L were not,<br />
inc luded.<br />
M-14 was fed following the cereal test diet sequence, results fron plg nunber I were<br />
not included.<br />
columns A and B indicate the differences between il.ear and faecal revels. S<br />
Expressed as grams per 100 grams dry natter intake.<br />
\o'<br />
Determlned by acid hydrolysis.<br />
Urz<br />
.030 -.01ó<br />
.or& -.00[<br />
.o39 +,003<br />
.o57 +.013<br />
.049 +.007<br />
.oL7 +.006<br />
.03[ +.011<br />
.or+o -.005<br />
.0ÀÀ +.002<br />
.05l+<br />
.083<br />
.111<br />
.otrz<br />
.058<br />
.045<br />
.o25<br />
.L67<br />
l3.l+2<br />
-.o02<br />
+.01-o<br />
'.Ðe<br />
-. 106<br />
-.518<br />
-.o33<br />
+.002<br />
-.r39<br />
-9.92
of tiìe j.leun to the -faeces. These increases na;,: have 'ceen<br />
Cue tc de nci'o nicrcbiel sl,'nth3sis of these eirj_nc acids<br />
fron nltrc:en th:t was Cer.ived frc;: ;ic:.cbia1 dear.:inaficn<br />
Oí 'r,he na-ic¡ ¿initto eciis present 1n n'Ltcin.<br />
The le ,¡el_s of Pi.O in il_eel digeste. frcm Ì.--l and<br />
ì--Id r¡s¡¿ .314 anC .57C gr zns per ICC ;rans cí dr;' *.aa".<br />
intake respectivel-":' (ieble 44 ) . îÌ:e PÈO l-e',.eLs in ileal<br />
diëe ste frcn corn, whêat end barle',¡ were . 2ZZ, ,LlL ato<br />
.21 2 respecti';el-1,' (Table 42). True il:el av:iiabilities<br />
cf PF,O e:
pêr iCC ãrens cí irj,' :âtter intake, cf tie ¡er:a.l and<br />
r'::.intenanc: ilers ¡ave ccrresponCing net;bolic ileal ?;ìC<br />
'I ¡r¡al c ¡l 1ôn ']<br />
"<br />
barle;. rcspectr:-lel-r. Thus, iru= ileal- pF,C ar,'ailabiiitie s of<br />
9î.3, 9a.9 :ni 103 .Çii vrere obtainecÌ ícr cci.n, wheat anC<br />
barle-r respec-r.i.ve 1". The cal_cul_aticn carr.ie cì cut assuned<br />
â lineâr ::ola'.íclshin ì:ett;een crude fi'ce ¡ intake anC<br />
'i I c:1 ÐP:1 1-r.:l c<br />
.lccording tc Sauer et 3.1 . (f9?L) neiabolic a;rino<br />
acíC 1e\'eLs ccrrespcncing tc perticular test C j-ets sl:culd<br />
be Cet=rnined !.ri'i,h crotein-free diets thet ccntain the sare<br />
level cf unii eestible d:.¡' :attir as the tes.t diets frcin<br />
tvhic¡: cne Ce:e::.lines tf.e true a:inc e:ic ¡'.-aileiilltle s. The<br />
^?^:1h+- ^ -ia .a',. ú:l-Ci.,inLS ñaêc.iF- .È;Ê^rr-È C' C.f7 I:âit:¡ +<br />
I-rùÐ-:.: L:-r !,,i::_ -le enJ CÍ the iJ_:U:,<br />
pe r 1Cû grans of drrl' netter intaire , r,vere Lj .Zi , Z) ,3L, Lg ,gC ,<br />
26.7C e!\i. lJ.8C 3rans îar i--7, i_-1,!, ccÍ'n, r.;heat anci barle;r<br />
respectil¡ê1" (lab1e 42 enC 4f ). Sinilar t;-pe cf ccr.reciicns<br />
(as ior e c-uel- ci'ude fibe:. intake ) íor the deterninaticn cf<br />
retahclic il-e al- PÌC level_s noul_i result in tru¿ ?l-"0 aveil_a_<br />
biLities exceeding 100f, fcr eII ce:.eal_ gi.ains r.ested.<br />
Ti-.e interpretation cf dei.a c'cta j-neii Í:.cn the<br />
nei:rt=nance anci ce:.eal test Ciets i:: ti^e c:.:r.-ic,:s secticr:<br />
ir'ere Ì:ased cn :'=sult,s -,hat were expr"essed ês êi:ans reÌ. IOC<br />
¡:'l:s c-i ::';i .::e'*t:r lnta).=, Th: :1-3:.eã: C:i1-.- .ir;- i-.âtrej.<br />
ir.t:ke '¡" *"1:e p1;s îed _l-? e:ld i.-lt¡ was ll"ã: (ê?.31, o.f<br />
'l?1
al-lowable intake ) and Ç35 grar¡is (48,9!3 of allov,'able iniake )<br />
132<br />
respectivelj¡ (Appendix, Tabl-e 9). The average dail¡r dry natieÌ'<br />
intake of the cereal diets by the pigs was equal to the<br />
allowable daily intake in aii cases anci was l_d55, Id49 anci<br />
LE57 for corn, wheat and barley respectively (Appendix,<br />
Table l, 4 and 5). Calculations baseC on equal total crude<br />
fiber intake for the cereal and aaintenance diets (in the<br />
sane aanner es they were caried out for crude fj.ber iniake<br />
per 100 grams of dry n:aiter intake) will result in true<br />
PRO availabilities of 96.7, 100.4 and lO7.li; for corn, rvheai<br />
and barley respectively.<br />
From the previouè discussion one might believe that<br />
PRO of casein was o.f relatively low availability at the end of<br />
th.e ileun. Ìf this was the case for pfi,O, what thon about the<br />
true ileal availabilities of the other amino aci"ds fron casein?<br />
laking into accounl the possibility that casein was<br />
perhaps not completely digesied. and absorbed brr the end of the<br />
i1eum, coraplete protêin-free diets v¡ere fed to the cannul_ated<br />
pigs as part of study 4a. Therefore, the ciata obtaineci íor<br />
nretabolic ileal and faecal anino acid levels fror:: feeding the<br />
protein-free diets in study 4a rvill be used ior the estinations<br />
of true ileal anino acid availabilities f:"om corn, wheat anci
'ìi+.:^<br />
e aï'ô t<br />
-l .i ^+ ^<br />
lhre: ijjí:rent :rcte1::-jree dieis cc:rtainllg !,<br />
l-C anC 1j;1, alphafioc j.espectiys]..r r,.r3¡o fed -.o the pigs 1n<br />
study La. The ê,.r3râîe iallv dr-. :etter inta]:: r",ere l_l5l Ê.<br />
ícr ?I-5i I)57 g. for.PF-10 anC 1109 g. íor pF-15<br />
/'^-^-;i- a^r-r ^ .r<br />
\.-:.:v.-.--s:-!, -c.-!v .. , 21. and 25 ).<br />
Coniinucu_s prcblens h'e.rê experienced du_ring the<br />
f:eCin¡ of the ?F-l_5 iiets. Elockage ccc,_,.rr.ei fr=c_uentl¡r,<br />
Sften the cannuiae 'cecane dlsconnectecì, z.esu_ltíng in large<br />
ioss:s cí digesta. lhr:e cf the 6 pigs l.rent ccrpletel_v cff<br />
f :e d after. the fir.st ci- se ccnC cê,,¡ th.i -"h=i, vere cffered the<br />
Pi-15 C j-ets, The refor.e , suita'oie statist,icei ¿¡¿frrs3s fç-r,<br />
the deterninêtion of t]:e effect cf bcC¡i v,reight end l_evel cf<br />
di-.târ-r' f i':e r cn ;::eta'roIic i,Lea1 anC faecel anino acid level_s<br />
cculC nct be per:-cred. P:.evious Ì.esults c'c.tein=d frcn pigs<br />
fed the naintenance Ci3ts (Tâble 26) and fl.on i-:ts feC ihe<br />
prctein-fr:e dier.s (Ta'cle 1û ) shcl"¡eC that --he:.e .',.;a s ,¡ir.t ual_l..-<br />
nc efÍect- cÍ i¡eiEi.t on thenetaboiic faeca.l- ¿¡-.ino ¿cic ievels<br />
t.;hen these l/rel.e expr_êssed as grens pet 1OO ,ri.a:ls cí Cri,<br />
äetier intak=. _r.lthcuqh Cata l.rer,e a¡,-a i-'t a':1: onl¡, í:-cr. pigs<br />
¡r::,¡hc-ar{ Á .-Á O +l<br />
, r e :ì-ã r.sults obtain:C sç=:t:i to i.r:cicere<br />
that r,¡eirht haC nc ne_cÌ. 3Íf?ct cn tle :retâ.'cclic il_e:I<br />
:::inc :cij i-.-:.:r s (.t¡psnCix, Te'rle 2L a:1: 2: ).<br />
ns<br />
'I i?
ïn general , increasing the fiber levels of the<br />
protein-free diets increased the netabolic ireal and faecal<br />
anrino acid and nitrogen revers. The increment in the reveJ-s<br />
of iLeal and faecal arnino acids levelred off as ihe arphafroc<br />
content of the protein-free diets was raised fro¡r l0 to L5ji<br />
(Table 45 ) . Due to the lir¡rited aäiount o.f resulis available<br />
from diet PF-15, it is not possible to tell if the increase<br />
in metabolic ilea1 and faecal aníno acid levels with in_<br />
creasing fiber intake is of a linear or a curvilinear<br />
relationship. Theoreticall¡r, it is not unreasonable to<br />
pos¿ulate a limit to metabolic losses by the ani¡nal and<br />
assune a curvilinear relationship.<br />
. The relationships of the ileal and faecal ar¿ino<br />
acid and nitrogen 1eve1s betr,veen I.l_ Z and l{_lle were basically<br />
L3l*<br />
sirnj.lar to those observed be.tween pF_5 anci FF_IO (Tab1e 4& anci<br />
45). For both PF-5 and PF-10 (and also for pf-15), there was<br />
a consistent net disappeârance of ARG, TH.,ì, Giy, pRO and SiR<br />
in the large intestine. consístent net increases were found<br />
for flE, LEU, i,yS, i,fET, pHE and ASp.<br />
ït seemed that as the leve1 of alphafloc was j.ncreased<br />
fronr 5 to rofi, particular anrino acids decreased, nore (for e:lar,rple<br />
GLT and PRO) and particular anino acids increased nore (for<br />
exanple ll,E, LEU, LYS and pHI). <strong>fn</strong> other r,rords, nore nicrobial<br />
fermentation seemed to take place in ihe large intestine v¡ith<br />
PF-10 than with pF-5.
TÂBLE 45. Amlno acld, total, nltrogen and dry ratter appearânce (+) or<br />
disappearance (-)t in the large intestlDe 1n pigs fed the<br />
proteln-free dLets.<br />
LEvxL OF<br />
ALPHAFLOC (ø}<br />
LOCATTON<br />
ÂMINO ACIDS<br />
Essenùla1<br />
-tñe'-<br />
HTS<br />
ILE<br />
I,EU<br />
LTS<br />
MEl<br />
PIIE<br />
THR<br />
vAL<br />
Non-EssentlaL<br />
ALA<br />
. ASP<br />
cTs<br />
GLU<br />
CLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYT<br />
NITROGEN<br />
DRY MATTEN<br />
1<br />
?<br />
ILEUM2 FAECES2 A<br />
. o[9<br />
.0r4<br />
.o2L<br />
.o39<br />
.02?<br />
.006<br />
.o23<br />
.o39<br />
,ort<br />
'o41<br />
.056<br />
.o13<br />
.07L<br />
.!39<br />
. r+Zt+<br />
.038<br />
.o13<br />
.205<br />
TL.67<br />
.o22 -.O27<br />
.o10 -.ootl<br />
,o27 +.006<br />
.042 +.003<br />
.036 +.009<br />
.012 +.006<br />
.026 +.003<br />
.030 -.009<br />
.o33 +.002<br />
,036 -.o05<br />
.06r +.o05<br />
.oto -.0o3<br />
.068 -.oo3<br />
.031 -.10¿t<br />
.026 -.4'+8<br />
.026 -.o12<br />
.o1¡l +.oo1<br />
.lot -.104<br />
6.1+8 -5.L9<br />
10<br />
IIÆÙü2 FÀECESz B<br />
II,EUT{2 FAECESz C<br />
,o29 -.O29 .061<br />
.01À -.001 ,o22<br />
,o39 +.0r0 . o31<br />
.059 +.008 .O57<br />
.048 +.o12 .o39<br />
.0r7 +.009<br />
,o37 +,OØ .o33<br />
.0,¡1 -.010 .o59<br />
,0[9 +.006 .olt[<br />
.056 .o53 -,oo3 .O58 .o59<br />
.o7t .08t+ +.006 ..o81 .096<br />
.016 .o13 -.003<br />
.094 .096 +.0O2 .too .108<br />
.L7l .oi3 -.128 ,tç9 .or+7<br />
.ii? .0116 -.53L .185 .o38<br />
.0r+9 .o35 -.01l} .o52 -O3?<br />
,oii .oi6 +.OOi ,016 .oI8<br />
.256 .t39 -.117 ..27L .1q1<br />
L7.69 LO.st -7.J.6 26.32 14.78<br />
Expressed aB grans¡ per 100 gran dry natter intake, shovrn in colu¡nns A, B, c and D.<br />
CoIunnB indicate lfeal or faecel 1ev6ls.<br />
Converted results fron Holmes et aL,, (1974),<br />
-.o28<br />
- ,oo7<br />
+. O24<br />
+.010<br />
+.0t5<br />
+.007<br />
-. olr+<br />
+.009<br />
+,0O1<br />
+. O15<br />
+. o08<br />
- .r22<br />
-.51+7<br />
-.016<br />
+. o02<br />
-.110<br />
-It. rrl<br />
Lk.51<br />
ILEuM2 FA¡cEs2 D<br />
.L37 +.10ó<br />
.006 +,003<br />
.051 +.O25<br />
.o89 +.048<br />
.o92 +.056<br />
,o20 +. o17<br />
.o55 +.O33<br />
.o72 +.030<br />
.o59 +. O2t-<br />
.o48 .o82 +.031+<br />
.058 .1lo +.o72<br />
.005 .o25 +.020<br />
.080 .L62 +.082<br />
,082 .o78 -.oot+<br />
.33L .OtL -.297<br />
.oLd .o50 +.o)2<br />
.0[o .o71 +.031<br />
',+27 .360 -.06?<br />
L9.20 13.[O -5.80<br />
P
liolnes ç! al. (L97U) fed c:.otein-free Ciers<br />
containing Id. !'rJ alphafLoc to 6 cannul_ated pigs that ',.reigired<br />
approxinately !+5 kg. Their results and those obtained in<br />
these studies lrere quite díi.ierent (Tabte 45 ). ir'ith *,,he<br />
exception of PRO and clY, Iiolnes et al . (L9?L) found a<br />
net increase of al-l andno aciCs between the end oÍ the il_eu_n<br />
and the anus. These increases l^iere ver¡r substantial for ARG<br />
especially, -:U, :TS, ASP and GLij. The anino acid corirposition<br />
(grains per 16 grans of niirogen ) of netabolic faecal protêin<br />
f:'orn pigs deternined at diffe::ent labor.atories j-s shov;n in<br />
'1 1A<br />
Table 46. Al-though there r^¡ere difÍerences i n ."he composi tion<br />
for sonre anino acids (?Tij, S:.,', and TyF; in particular ) , generat Ìy<br />
speaking the resulis obtained. i.n these studies, ihose of<br />
Danme:.s (1964), car-1son and Ëaylei, (r9?o) ând rggun (1!/t)<br />
cor4pare reasonebll¡ Heli. The netabolic faecal anino eciC<br />
cor:position obtained b,r' äoh¿es et al. (l-97 U) diff ered nar.Ìredlli<br />
frcn those obtained in these s'undi.es and -ír.on the o-,,her woriiers,<br />
e speci-al 1¡r t^rith r.egs.:.d to the conient of ÁRG and ijfS. rnsuf_<br />
ficient dietary ecuilibration may heve taken place by the tine<br />
iiolnes et. al- . (197 4) collecteci f aecai riate::ial_ . ihe la'urr,er<br />
rnal¡ have contrib'uteci to t,he rel ative,r y ]arge increases -,,hat<br />
'1.¡ere iound for sc:lie ar:ti no acicis betrveen t,ile end of the iie,;.-t<br />
anc.l '¿lie anus in their siud.i es (îabLe l*5 ) .<br />
The levei oÍ .fiber i-nciusion in the proieir:_ír.ee<br />
diets j-n t,hese studies dict no'{, seen ¡o have a na;or effeci
TABTE tÌ6. Anino acid composltionl of metabolic protein d€ternined at<br />
df fferent laboratories.<br />
AMT$O ACTDS<br />
Egsential<br />
AAG<br />
HIS<br />
rLE<br />
I,ETJ<br />
IYS<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
lHR<br />
vAt<br />
Non-Essentlal<br />
I<br />
t<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
cYs<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÏR<br />
SAUER (1976)2<br />
PF-5 PF-10 Pr-15<br />
3.t+9 3.3t+<br />
1.58 L.62<br />
l+.28 l+.18<br />
6.65 6,?9<br />
5.?o 5.53<br />
r.90 L.96<br />
t+.Lz b.26<br />
L.75 t+.72<br />
5.23 5.6t+<br />
9.66 9.67<br />
1.56 1.50<br />
LO.77 11.05<br />
l+.91" I+.95<br />
t+.Lz 5.29<br />
t+.L2 4.03<br />
2.22 f .8¡)<br />
5 .70 ó. 10<br />
3.28<br />
L'ttg<br />
l+.1+7<br />
6.66<br />
5.37<br />
3.98<br />
l+.1t7<br />
5.27<br />
5.86<br />
9.5L<br />
LO.73<br />
\.67<br />
3.?8<br />
3.68<br />
L.79<br />
Expressed as grams per 16 grams of nitrogen.<br />
ÐAIJIMERS CARLSON ANd<br />
(L964) BAYI,ET<br />
(1970 )<br />
3.20<br />
1. &0<br />
Il. OO<br />
5.60<br />
4.90<br />
2.10<br />
3.60<br />
4.80<br />
5.00<br />
5.30<br />
9.00<br />
r..50<br />
9.1+O<br />
I+.20<br />
3.80<br />
1. d0<br />
ulão<br />
6. r+o<br />
4.30<br />
3.80<br />
5.10<br />
4.90<br />
5.00<br />
8.30<br />
8.00<br />
ö.30<br />
2,20<br />
4.?o<br />
3.00<br />
EGGUM HO¿MES<br />
(r97r) er al<br />
]Jemt<br />
l+.I9 6.09<br />
2.O9 O.27<br />
3.97 2.27<br />
6.07 3.96<br />
5.65 L.Og<br />
2.O3 0.89<br />
5.09 z.t+t+<br />
,1. 38 3 .2o<br />
t+.82 2.62<br />
5.61+<br />
8.3t+<br />
1.61<br />
10.66<br />
è.48<br />
7.OL<br />
3.t+4<br />
3.61+<br />
5.78<br />
1.11<br />
7.20<br />
3.L7<br />
L.5L<br />
2.22<br />
3.L6<br />
Determined for protein-free diets wíth different levels of alphafloc. inclusion.<br />
?
on tÌre co¡iposi-i,ioil oí neiabol_i c feecal protein (?abie +j ) .<br />
Proline in par.ti"cul ar antj. GLï were present in<br />
abundant ânou.nts in il_ea.] digesi;a fr.o¡a the p:.otein-free diets.<br />
118<br />
(Tab1e 45 ) . These obse:'veiions v¡ouLd elin; nate the possibi--i-";.<br />
tilat PRO f:'on casej-n lvas oi lo-iv availability. b,- the end oí ihe<br />
j-l-ew;r. The level of P;ì0 in iieai tìigesta froin pi.- j was ev€n<br />
higher thån tì'iet, ob'r,ained í:'ora ì _-f ( iabt e +4 and 45 ) . The<br />
levels of FRO obt,ained íror: eiihei' pF-lO, pF-ij or ìl-i4 were<br />
oi the saine order.<br />
.¡.pparent ilea.l- anino acid evailabili-ties and. rttrue<br />
j.l-eal availebilit,ies that uere calcul-ated by using d.i fferent<br />
correclions for ;:ietabolic ileal anino acid Ievels are shoun<br />
in Tablg 47, 4'ð and 49 for cora, wheat anC barle¡, r.especiiveiy.<br />
l.ie'r,abolic i-Ieal anino acicÌ corections for obtaining<br />
irue avail-abiiitÍes wer.e carried out as follo,.os: 1) On the<br />
basis of equal crucie fiber in-ual.:e of the cereal_ ancì. proiej_nfree<br />
ciiets ani 2 ) cn the basi s of eoual encì,nt s of unciigesiible<br />
dr¡r nalter passing t,hrougl-r -uhe end of the íleun fron the<br />
cereaL and protei.n-free ciiet,s. For exanple, as the ievel of<br />
crude Íiber intake increased frcn J.3ó;, íoi. pF-,< to ó.ðO;, ior<br />
PF-10, the level of ne¡eboiic ileal_ LyS íncreased fron .O2J<br />
to . Cl 5 Êrer1s per lOO grans of cìr;r ì:ie-,,',, e Ì. j.niake (Table 32 anC<br />
45). Then, by exirapolation of the line conneciing these<br />
2 points one cen esiinate the netabolic il_eal_ ITS levels et,
TABLE ,+7. Appqlel! ileal anlno acid availabflfties from corn and the estimated true<br />
avaÍlabiLiùies as caLculated by the use of dlfferent type of correciions.<br />
TYPE OF<br />
CORRTCTION<br />
AMINO ACIDS<br />
Essential<br />
-Trc'-<br />
HTS<br />
IIE<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS,<br />
lffiTo<br />
PiTE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
ASP<br />
cYs<br />
GLU<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÏR<br />
NÏTROGEN<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
^ø)r<br />
APPARENT<br />
.l+l+5 .056<br />
.251+ .030<br />
.354 .0U5<br />
L.3o7 .O99<br />
.338 .06r<br />
.25O .020<br />
,523 .0À9<br />
.36h .o?7<br />
.456 .069<br />
.760 .088<br />
.723 .116<br />
.200 .036<br />
2.085 .L66<br />
.399 .L29<br />
.8L3 .222<br />
.505 .O??<br />
,395 . oÀ.3<br />
r.995 .348<br />
B2 c(%f<br />
87.1+<br />
88.2<br />
87.3<br />
92.L<br />
82.0<br />
9L.9<br />
90.6<br />
78.8<br />
8t+.9<br />
88. t+<br />
8t*. o<br />
82.t<br />
92.O<br />
67.7<br />
73.?<br />
8t¡.8<br />
89. t<br />
82.6<br />
D4<br />
CRUDE FTBER<br />
INTAKE<br />
E("/"''5<br />
.0rÈ6 97 .è<br />
.013 93.3<br />
.018 92.L<br />
.o35 95.t<br />
.024 89.t<br />
.005 9¡1.0<br />
.020 9L.5<br />
.o35 86.5<br />
.o27 90.8<br />
.036 93.2<br />
.ot+g go.7<br />
.012 88.0<br />
.063 95.L<br />
.L29 100.0<br />
.t+38 L25.6<br />
.O3tr 93.5<br />
.oLz 92.2<br />
.188 92.O<br />
Column A lndicates the dietary arrlno acid content. 2 colo*r, B<br />
ilear<br />
indicates the apparent<br />
ani.no acid revels, expressed as grans per r00 gram ãry natter tntake.<br />
colunn c indlcates the apparent itear amino acld avai.labilities.<br />
Colur¡ns D indicate t!9 lespective corrected netabollc ileaL amino acid levols, expressed<br />
as grams per 100 grams dry- rnatter <strong>fn</strong>take.<br />
Columns E indÍcate the respective true lleal am<strong>fn</strong>o acid availability estlnates. 5<br />
Deternlned by the oxidation method.<br />
\o<br />
TRUE<br />
DRY MATTER<br />
P¡,SSAGE<br />
Dl+<br />
.058<br />
.oL7<br />
.o2g<br />
.051<br />
.035<br />
.030<br />
.05r-<br />
.ol+3<br />
.05a<br />
.078<br />
.09l+<br />
.t7L<br />
.577<br />
.0119<br />
.015<br />
.256<br />
Eø15<br />
100.r+<br />
9t+.9<br />
95.5<br />
'96.3<br />
92.3<br />
96.b<br />
92.9<br />
th.3<br />
95.8<br />
2!.7<br />
96.5<br />
IIO.5<br />
LI+z.L<br />
9l+.5<br />
92.9<br />
' 95.4<br />
D4<br />
.028<br />
.oo7<br />
.003<br />
.012<br />
.009<br />
.002<br />
.007<br />
.oLz<br />
.003<br />
.006<br />
.00r+<br />
.009<br />
.020<br />
.07l+<br />
.222<br />
.or3<br />
.009<br />
.o90<br />
PROLINE<br />
Eø)5<br />
93.7<br />
90,9<br />
88. r<br />
93.3<br />
81. e<br />
92.8<br />
92.O<br />
82. t<br />
85.5<br />
89.5<br />
8t+.5<br />
86.5<br />
93,L<br />
86.2<br />
100.0<br />
8?.3<br />
91.t+<br />
8z.t
TABIE ,¡8. Apparent-Íleal amlno acid availabititles from wheat and the estimated true<br />
availabllities as calculated by the use of different type of corrections.<br />
TÏPE OF<br />
CONRECTION<br />
AMINO ACIDS (ø)<br />
Essentlal<br />
-ætr-<br />
HIS<br />
ILE<br />
I,E1'<br />
LYS,<br />
I\MTO<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
-m'-- ASP.<br />
cYS0<br />
GLT)<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
A(%f<br />
APPARENT<br />
cv"f<br />
¡4<br />
CRUDE FTBER<br />
ÏNTAKE<br />
E(/ò5<br />
DNY MATTER<br />
PASSAGE<br />
Ev")5<br />
?gr, :8i? 89:I :8tl Etr:; :ïrL B9:Z<br />
{r44 .065 85.t+ .otd 89.t} .031 S2.s<br />
97.O .L?Z 86.9 .O3r+ 9O.r+ .Oi7 SZ.t<br />
3-ç? .999 7r.? .92tr q?. j .oie 's6'.t<br />
?t+L .o32 86.7 .oOi 88.t<br />
ç7\ .o75 8$.8 .o2o 91.6 .033 s3.?<br />
3_96- .q?l 26.+ .03rr $i.z .ote ef'.i<br />
5I+5 .o9r+ 82.8 ,026 8?.j .o4rÌ So.ð<br />
.L27 .o35 Ê1.1 .058 85.9<br />
.L67 .Qb7 q2.3 .081 87.3<br />
.ot+z .012 89.3<br />
.32L .06? 9¡1. t .100 g5.o<br />
.LI+9 .L26 95.9 .L69 Lo3.5<br />
.191 .\32 L\6.7 .585 L27.3<br />
.101 .o33 89.3 .o53 Sz.L<br />
.o57 .012 88.9 .016 89.9<br />
. 1188<br />
.677<br />
.28L<br />
Il.4À0<br />
.566<br />
L.t+t+5<br />
.633<br />
.Iro7<br />
z.60T<br />
NONE<br />
82<br />
NÏTROGEN . Ll+5<br />
7L,O<br />
75.3<br />
85.1<br />
92.7<br />
73.7<br />
86.8<br />
8tl. o<br />
86. o<br />
82.9<br />
.184<br />
90.0<br />
Lr 21 3, \r 51 6 Refer to Table tfl for expranatlon.<br />
.27L<br />
93,3<br />
¡4<br />
PROLTNE<br />
E(r"r5<br />
:86á E?:2<br />
.001 85.6<br />
.009 d7.8<br />
.006 77.r+<br />
.001 gZ.t<br />
.005 89.6<br />
.009 78.8<br />
.000 82.d<br />
,00o 75.3<br />
.008 87,9<br />
.016 93.L<br />
.066 85.3<br />
.L91 100.O<br />
.010 85.6<br />
.oo8 d8.o<br />
.076 8¡. ¿<br />
. oo4 7t+.8<br />
ts<br />
O
TABI,E l+9. App+Iel!-iLeal arnlno acld availabillties fron barley and the estinated true<br />
availabilities as cal-culated by the use of different type of corrections.<br />
TTPE OF<br />
CORRECTTON<br />
AMINO ACIDS<br />
Essentlal<br />
--ffiE_<br />
HIS<br />
rLE<br />
I,EU<br />
LYSz<br />
MET()<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
AtA<br />
ASP.<br />
CYSO<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NITROGEN<br />
L, 2, 3, l+, 5,<br />
A$f<br />
.569<br />
.229<br />
.390<br />
.855<br />
.l+L5<br />
.L93<br />
.60L<br />
.381<br />
.5LL<br />
.t+82<br />
.691+<br />
.zLg<br />
2.927<br />
.l+85<br />
L.2t5<br />
.501<br />
.36t+<br />
2.222<br />
APPARENT<br />
B2<br />
NONE<br />
cv")3<br />
.to6 81.À<br />
.0r+5 80.3<br />
.082 79,O<br />
.158 8L.5<br />
.111 73.3<br />
.038 80.3<br />
.Lo7 82.2<br />
.110 ?L.L<br />
.120 77.9<br />
.L46 69.7<br />
.200 7t.2<br />
.Orl9 ?7.6<br />
,393 86,6<br />
.f68 65.tþ<br />
.232 80.9<br />
.LLg 76.2<br />
.o7h 79.2<br />
.558<br />
7L.9<br />
D4<br />
053<br />
oL5<br />
02b<br />
04'+<br />
030<br />
007<br />
026<br />
oÀl}<br />
036<br />
Ol+7<br />
070<br />
01À<br />
080<br />
L52<br />
CRUDE FTBER<br />
ÏNTAKE<br />
5L6 1<br />
ot+2<br />
0t rl<br />
225<br />
6 R"f"r to TabLe l+7 for explanation.<br />
E$)5<br />
90.? .06r<br />
86.9 .O22<br />
85,1 .03r<br />
è6.? .o5?<br />
80.5 .o39<br />
83.9<br />
È6.5 ,O33<br />
82.7 .O59<br />
8r+.6 .0ÀÈ<br />
79.5 .058<br />
8r-.3 .odr<br />
8lr. o<br />
89.3 .100<br />
96.7 .L69<br />
.23.t+ .5t:5<br />
8[.6 ,o53<br />
83.5 .016<br />
85. O<br />
TRUE<br />
DRY MATTER<br />
PASSAGE<br />
DÀ<br />
.27L<br />
E$)5<br />
92.L<br />
90.0<br />
86.9<br />
88.2<br />
82.7<br />
87.b<br />
86-6<br />
86.0<br />
8L.7<br />
82.9<br />
gõlo<br />
100.2<br />
L29.L<br />
86.6<br />
84. r<br />
87.L<br />
PROLTNE<br />
nb Eø15<br />
o2g<br />
oo7<br />
004<br />
013<br />
009<br />
002<br />
007<br />
013<br />
oot+<br />
.009<br />
.006<br />
.009<br />
.o22<br />
.076<br />
.232<br />
.oLrl<br />
.009<br />
.09lr<br />
86.5<br />
83.4<br />
80.5<br />
83. O<br />
75.1+<br />
8r.3<br />
83.1r<br />
7r+.5<br />
78.7<br />
7L.6<br />
72.O<br />
81.7<br />
87.3<br />
8L.o<br />
I00.0<br />
79,o<br />
82.1<br />
79.t<br />
ts<br />
þ,
c:le:' Ie',-=ls ci cmde ilber í .e. zt the cir_ii: iib=r le v=is<br />
¡j the cere.:i ¡:.:i::s. Thc cr-u_Le íiber le'..Eis c.i cct.::, l.ih-:at<br />
if: ìa:'::. ;,'Cr.: 2.62. ? -:.ê çrì : r':-. -¡..nc -i: ì-: l ,, /-.hì ^ .t.\<br />
.-<br />
_<br />
-¡¡<br />
-<br />
L--Ì: .r:---= ^êÈ^ Utus¿, ^..¿.j^-â i-L:c: !¡_r,..<br />
3jì--¡ I<br />
^r..¡- i_u:¿ _- ^r-^.1 ^<br />
=:S<br />
2t.. t_.y-¿e.4\=)_.. \ _cL,t_j 47,/.<br />
,.,^-..:<br />
\¡iC:-L* :11-:<br />
_..:,.^<br />
ccrr: s¡c:ri.i"::¿ ::t::cl_ic 11e:1 _IS 1_-',._.ls cf î.2*. C. ?4 end<br />
',r.iU ¡re:s -rer .l_ r-ìC g:.a::s ci dr; ::tter i¡:t;ke (:abie LT, 1¿<br />
a.ni +? ) . The a¡par=nt 1leel a:i;:.c aci¡l 1e.,-=is l;ere thcn<br />
cci'rec:e d ícr the cci-iespcncing Ee r-abclic il ea.1 anino acii<br />
l-e'¡ais ancL ti'ue il-eel anino acio :vailatilitie s r.ie¡e cbtalned.<br />
Fcr the ês _:i::ìêiicn oÍ true ilea.l ava-i labil-it res c.i<br />
a¡:ino aciCs 'oaseci cn 'te c_ue1 irlr n^tto- pass:ger?, the ca1_<br />
cu-lations '..¡e'e based on the r-erel s cf i.ndige stible dri.' neti:r<br />
passing thrcurh the enC of the it eun fcr -r,ho tes'u and<br />
pi"otein-free diets. The ¿-.,pe of cci.rections thåt were cetr:ei<br />
rlrz<br />
cut resul--eC 1n :rue atailahit it ies ci lìî tl-.¿t ::lc:e i:c lOC..,<br />
íc:: all cer:e.l- gi'ains. i:r aiditicn, true a',,eilabi,. i-ties cf CLy<br />
exc:ei:d lic.' 1n scre inste.nces ( -abì: l-? , a.- a::d 19),<br />
It si:c;l_i be ke lt :n n1::: .t,het :_et:':olic il_cal ¿::tno<br />
:ni^ I ^=--i c .a^,--.?èc-^-.li-- f L! ^ -:.- r:,ù ^^h^^t _=¿:_: i)qi -:i:+c r.,r¡¡ ^.,: -^<br />
n¡ l =l¡Ä t ,...-a -- .-,<br />
iwç!- !-u .!r-1:ç-rr- -¡ ùri oate c'ctainei i:.cn iiiets ?F_i ¡ ncÌ pi_1C.<br />
-_^¿<br />
^r-^1i^ .:r -<br />
^i,^i-^¡ ^.¡t -- ¡_: rc.!u.L*\_ *¿-:-.,L j= r_^,_ î ¡ j _- ---^ ;.: _<br />
-¿ r./c:.ij U. ,.ä.:jie _i C:.lI:. _- -. _ _._ct<br />
ll-l5 ¡rr.4 ''-..q= qr-: i¡va 'r:e,r 'ci:q.,¡ ì-¡¡¡-...¡ ¡i tL: --¡.^t ¿<br />
' ' '2, -_. w;rJìiS<br />
thct i.¡e r: e::ccu:r,e¡'=d :urir; the l:eil::g cí ti-1s ;iet. ::or.,e -.-:r.
tne in-r, erpreiat ion of resu_lis obtainecj. l+cutC not' chang,:,<br />
esse ntiall;-, .v:ti ií data fron Ci-ei pl-i j r^rere incl_udeC.<br />
fci' the extrapolation cf ireiabolic ileai enino åcid levels<br />
í:'c¡l the pi'otein-free ciets. Si.:rilari;', interpre¡ation of<br />
¡'esults '.,voul-d nol changa if calculations based on total<br />
cruri¡ j:be:' i niel:3 or -r,ot â-r HJr;- :::a-".uei. !assaC3r! .r..iüre<br />
âô,--.;^¡ ^,.+<br />
e
t.aþ e .+) J . '_hcs: ?xtl.erlolâtions rcsulie C 1n veri, f ol.r l:v;l_s<br />
o.f netaÌ:o1ic i-ì eal anino acicÌs ancÌ ;ave t:.ue ileal_ a.,¡aila_<br />
bi.lit_v estj.nates thet Heie ver-;: close io the corresponding<br />
apparent availabi.liti, esiiraies for ;ros.L a;linc acirls (Tabie<br />
^i'I , +¿ ç.i.Lu +i I.<br />
ft is reasonable -r,o âssune that, -r,he true ileal<br />
availabilities of pEO fro:r cereal grains wil_1 be less than<br />
J-uu,;. '"j.leref ore, even ihe calculat,ions based. on ïì.COi, ti.ue<br />
Pì',0 ar,-ailabilii¡r fron cer.eal Sieinsr v.;i1l_ cr.erestinate the<br />
n,-taboli_c j l_e al- anino acid ievels associ ated r,.;ith the f eedin;;<br />
ur urie cereel g:al_ns.<br />
F-egarCless o.f -r,Ìre correciions used, ihe es.ûì;rated<br />
iÌ'ue l-.t_ee.I ¡IS avaì labil-ities .iion corn, v¡heat ancj. bar-iey-<br />
r';e:'e s''i,' i i'elatir¡ei;, 1ov¡ in r:el_âtion io t,ìre othe:. a¡.lino ac i cis .<br />
Corections baseC on ecuar ci-ucle fil-.er l-evel s r-esulteci i_n<br />
esti¡aated true i_leal_ LyS ar,-aiiabiii.i;ies of 69.1, E2.J and<br />
à^ --t üu.);" - lcr corn, wheet and bar.lei- respecti--;ei¡;. <strong>fn</strong> tha.u saüe<br />
order, their r,,re:-e 92.3 , ¿5. 5 and .ò2. ji) ,tihen .cased on ecuaì<br />
rr di'1" ilett,er .lassage rt.<br />
liov,'eve r, the i¡.pe of i:.eiabolic correc-i,ions iler_<br />
íor;red can not be l.aiid since ¡rue iieal pi,O e.nci CÌ,] ava-i l-a_<br />
LL+1"<br />
b;l-it,ies lve:'e obtalneC -,i:at e-.:ce:ied IOC).. Due to the :::-- e :ls j ;e<br />
cisappearance of these anino acids in rhe iarge intestine<br />
(presi*rabir. by nicrobi:-r. ci:g.::i::ailcn ) , t¡ue faecal a.¡ailabiliiies<br />
oÍ the se 2 anino acics ciid;.:o._l e::ceeci .l C0,,.
the calculations and postulations made are subject<br />
to several- possib]-e errors: t) fhe variability of the ileal<br />
PRO levels bethreen pigs fed the protein_free diets (Appendix,<br />
lable 23 , 2tç and, 25), Z) .{lthough consistent r.esults were<br />
obtained with regard to data fror.r di-ets pF_5 and. pF_lO, these<br />
could not be subjected to statistical analysis and j ) Es_<br />
timated true availabirities were based on rinear responses<br />
from data o'otained from the pF-5 and pF_IO dier,s.<br />
- ïn conclusi.on, there is the possibility that the<br />
use of protein-free diets for estimation of n:etabolic ileal-<br />
amino acid levels (and therefore also for metabolic faecal<br />
anino acÍd leve1s ) may result in overesti¡nation of the<br />
actual levels.<br />
r45<br />
The following discussion will deal with some possible<br />
explanations and postulations as to.why protein_free d.ie-r,s can<br />
overestimate the metabolic irear and faecar a¡nino acid losses<br />
as v¡e1l as nitrogen losses.<br />
According to líasset (1965) ingested protein is<br />
mixed with several times its mass of endogenous protein in the<br />
sraall intestine so that wide fluctuations in the amino acid<br />
roixture avaj-lable for absorption rvill not occur. The<br />
relatively constant amino acid nixture produced r^rill contríbute
to naxinrum efficienci.' in the utílization of amino acids by<br />
the animal . 0f course, this proposed horneostatic mechanisrn<br />
is of a short terra nature and will fail if a protein deficiency<br />
(or a specific anino acid deficiency) is imposed<br />
on the animal for: longer periods of time.<br />
r46<br />
Nasset (1965) estirnated that the total dailir enount<br />
of endogenous proteín secreted in*vo the lunen of the smali<br />
intestine of a ?O kg. raan to be 14I-351+ grans (Table 50).<br />
the estinate calculated by Irlasset is much higher than that<br />
calculateci by Fauconneau anci l.richel (L970), rvhicl: r.;as only<br />
67 grarns (Table 50). The ratter authorsr dic not incl_ude<br />
protein fronr intestinal juice as part of the endogenous pro_<br />
*,,ein derived from dige stÍve secretions , Not includ.ing<br />
estinates fron intestinal juice in Nessetrs calculations,<br />
the amount of protein secretad frorn digestive juices into<br />
the lumen v¡iIl be 24-63 grams. The rninimu¡c estimate<br />
obtained, 24 grams, compares reasonably well with that<br />
obtained by Fauconneau and ì.üchel (f9?O), which was 17 grams<br />
(iable 50). The estinates fro¡n both sources for protein<br />
derived fron mucosal shedding were not that different,<br />
namel¡, 50 and ?7-9L Zrams (fa¡te 5C).<br />
The manner in which l.Íasset (L965\ arrived at the<br />
relatively large contributi.on of enciogenous protein from<br />
intestinal juice to the total endogenous protein fron the
T¡.BLE 50. Estination of the daily endogeneous protein secretion into the lumen<br />
of the small intestine of a f0 kg. rnãn.<br />
RETERENCE<br />
ÏTE[fS<br />
PROTEIN FRO]{ DTGESTTVE<br />
SECRBTTONS<br />
Sa l iva<br />
Castric.Iuice<br />
Pancreatic.Iuice<br />
<strong>fn</strong>testínal Juice<br />
Fi ]e<br />
Subtotal ( A )?<br />
SubtotaI (D )J<br />
PROTETN FRO¡.I I,IUCOSAL<br />
SHEÐDT}ÌG<br />
TOTÂL PROTEIN (A):<br />
101ÂL PROTllIll (D )r<br />
r,uc,ls4l PROTËIN ij OF TOTAL<br />
(E )J<br />
I<br />
3<br />
VOLUME. PROTETN PROTETN<br />
Iiters (range )<br />
1.0- 1.5<br />
2.5- 3.5<br />
L.2- t.5<br />
t .0- 2.0<br />
l-5.2-27 ,O<br />
5.2- 7 .O<br />
Daily volrrme of the di¡restive secretions.<br />
Additions include data fron intestinâf juice.<br />
Additions do not include data from inbestinal juice.<br />
}TASSET (T9651 FAUCONNEAU<br />
and I{ïCHEL<br />
(r970 )<br />
{, (rang,e)<br />
0.2-0.8<br />
o.3-o.5<br />
1.0-2.0<br />
0. ¿l-1.0<br />
0.1*-0. ó<br />
grams ( range )<br />
2-I2<br />
8-18<br />
I2-3O<br />
40-200<br />
2-3<br />
64-263<br />
2tn-63<br />
't'7 _o1<br />
rt,r-3 5l+<br />
101-154<br />
50-90<br />
€lrâms<br />
3 E<br />
I<br />
1<br />
12<br />
r7<br />
50<br />
67<br />
ol<br />
75<br />
F<br />
\ì
digesl:ive secre-uj-ons is no-,- cieer, j,rasset (f?65) s.ua-r,eci<br />
e s ioll-cv¡s : lrThe vol.,¡ne s of secret,ion viere deriveci Í:.on<br />
ìììany sources anci except for i niest.inal ;uice, the:; are<br />
generailir availabie end accepteci. lhe large volu¡::e for<br />
int,estinal juice was computed Íro¡i the fåct *,het ti.ie pi*l_orus<br />
adnii'u s 7 iiters o.í gastrJ_c ccntents to t,Ìie ciuocienu-n in<br />
24 hr. enci thet gasiric contents are diLuteci three t,o Íive<br />
-"i-nies in the duodenum anC upper jejunun (E?írgstror:i ei aL,<br />
L957 ) , rr Subsequently, ¡¡âsset estiÌ:ra-ued t,he t,otai vol_une of<br />
i,ntestinel- juice secreteC daily into the lunen to be lCt to<br />
20 l-iiers , r,v i'uh variations in protein content fro:n O.lr to<br />
r- .Oi'i (Tabre jC ) .<br />
-n i ¡f ¡¡n<br />
_rr. lruc.r¡rêting iVasset rs data, Íi:.st of alL it is<br />
unclear how he errived at / Iit,ers of gastric contents io be<br />
enptied iaily into -r,he duodenum. !f these Z 1iters, a rjax_<br />
irtun of onl-y 3 .5 ¡.o 5 li-,,ers cân be êccounted Íor by sali_va<br />
ând gestric juice (Table 50 ) . Seconcily, liasse*,, inf ers fron<br />
'¡ork by Ëorgst,r'åh et aI. (W j? ) that ãestr:_c contenis ere<br />
dj-iuted t,hree to five ti¡ries in the duodenun ancÌ uppei,<br />
je-'unun. Ëorgsrrðr:: ë"r af - (L9j7) fed 5CO n1 . Iiquid test<br />
diets to ó hurian sub;ects. Sari:ples o_f di¿esta wer.e taiien<br />
by intubation. -jhe test neal ,1urj.ng its passage ihrough the<br />
duoden'¿n was ciilut,ed to a volune of 1 .5 -uo 2.5 liiers .<br />
Poll:elhyf en¿-f ,çcol, v¡i:ich is not absorbed Ín the int,estine ,<br />
-Lt8
i,'as used es a Ì-eference subsrance ro neesure lhe diluri on.<br />
Ëor¡ever, the
lá'c:'ov¡ske. (:?1) :. 'c ) ::l not inii.?t? a si -r::í:ca::¡ dilution<br />
of i=ad ni.--:'cì::: a'.: t':,a endc:tncus nit:c':n secrote: ir ih¿<br />
ircx:ì:âl pa::s cí thc ali:r=::te::- tract âs ies ':eo:: s.r:¡esteC<br />
by liesse t. Zé'crcrgsk¿ (L973 a, b ) fitteC ducC=nal- r.e-€nti.:.nt<br />
cennul-ee tc 5C kg. piEs. Lith the e).ceriion oí îLï, ti.e<br />
eninc aci,l corpcsi+- i on oí digesta cbtainei at the erd cí<br />
the duoCeriu¡: enC thet cf the Cie-t Íei ucre 1;er' s:niier,<br />
-41'¡c j¡e is Íc:-l::i in :"eleti'-':1-;' high ä:cr:::t s in ;I¡'ccchct ic<br />
¿ciC of the lrile a:rC its selts.<br />
ì.ot ia1:ing in¡o acccunt, the ,jcu.btful I evels ci<br />
enjc.qencrr.s pÌ-c:,t:n se cretio¡:s jz'cr i:rt¡stlnal ,':ic:, p.r.ct.:in<br />
I Ãa<br />
Corir:eC í;:cn ¡:Lr_cosal shedding iL'il_l :eke u_p iÌ:e na;or pi.cpo:.ticn<br />
cf the tote-.l e:cc3enous pr.ctein, na:reI;,' ?5;; u.si:rg iate fi.cn<br />
Feuconneau and l.ichel ând 5C to gCii (a-;:raee is 7C;, ) Lrsi.n6<br />
^-+^<br />
rt,^* /-.'^t^ (a\<br />
v.. Ir¿ÞJ=ú \ -cr:-t )vJ.<br />
Ìle =n:cle::cus protein ie :-1,.-ec frcr: sh:dc:C c=ll_s<br />
¡a..' b= subdir¡i Cei int,c : I ) protein cr aninc e^cids J-ocse1;,<br />
contâine i in tl:ese cel-1s. The p:ote in r¡il-I 'ce I ar.geI-r' :rade<br />
r'¡ ^f ^.'+^^1 ^^*j^ - "lZ-.'::eS tLat h,,C:.c1-.,Sê .{¡ -..i +,.i¡^^:.ir-<br />
anC Cisacchar-iie s, 2 ) prctein anCT'c:: an1:'Lo :c j.ds ti.;htI;-<br />
esscciated ;¡iih inn:i' ar:d cut-..t renì¡i"ane stt'-:ctul.3s, :nC I )<br />
nLlcr..l s pÌ'ctei-n associareC l.;:-th the autsr äen'cr.ane pårt cí tìte<br />
cells. lhe l:st 2 t'-tas cÍ ¡rctei:t .?r3 cf : lc'¡rlr digest i":ii-it:<br />
th:n the c:'tcple sri3 g:'ct€in ¡nC rr'ill ihe r=fc:e :ake :: tl.e
:1a.ior' ¡oz'ti o:'r of 1::Ci.-esti blc e::do¡.eno,.is prctein tl.et<br />
v¡as founC at the enC of tie ileur¡. peptiCc_g11,,ca ns (par.t, oÍ<br />
Íìucu_s protein) are resisiant to trlrpsin and peosin (¡.l1-iso¡,<br />
i97A). Ihe rel-ative diges;ibiì ities o-i rvhole cell_s of<br />
bacteria and cell contents indicated that niiroêen in r.,rall<br />
structures was undigestibl-e (Tannenba:,rn , 196€:),<br />
is it possible, then, that the prc-uein-free Ciets<br />
that were useci in these studies increased the shedding of<br />
epithelial ceLls allove the 1e.¿el nornall-.,- tajcinq place du_ring<br />
th¡ Lrrç r--çuurè iô..^ i h - ^e or +L.- rnè cereai -uest diets? Fee
52<br />
Ìocations in the body, mal¡ have taken place. Âs rn¡as explaineC<br />
previous}¡, a pert of the endogenous protein derived frorn in_<br />
creased cellular slough-off mâ:7 escape nornal digestion (i.e. Uy<br />
digestive enzynes) prior to the end of the ileun. This wourc<br />
result in higher ¡retaboric ireal a¡:ino acid revers than those<br />
that would be obtained during the feeCing of balanced diets.<br />
The higher r¿etabolic ileal arnino acid levels in turn nay give<br />
rise to higher netabolic faecal levels.<br />
Protein-free diets are usualI¡r enployeC to determine<br />
the metabolic faecal ar¿ino acid and nitrogen losses. ln most<br />
experiments ín which protein-free diets are used., faecal<br />
collections are caried out after 5 to lO davs i.e. before feed<br />
consunption becornes too 1ow. The determination of ¡¡eteboli.c<br />
faecar anino acids and nitrogen during this tir¡e rna¡l well have<br />
been the measurement of the undigestible protein conponents<br />
derived from the increased loss of intestinel cerrs. Ðue to the<br />
extensive nodification of msls¡61ic ileal a¡nino acid 1eve1s by<br />
the flora in the large intestine, this rneasurenent will be<br />
¡nore evident when determined at the end of the ileun than when<br />
determined b;r faecal colle ct ion.<br />
The epÍthelial cel1s of the smalI intestine na1, have<br />
been shedded at an increased rate, inítially during the feeding<br />
of protein-free diets. The amino ecid needs of these celrs<br />
could be directl.v dependent on the suppl¡r of arnino acids pro_<br />
Cuced during digestion. îhis suppl,v would be verj¡ 10ü¡ du:.ing
+'-5 frâ¡.in_- ,^a 5É^1"êi¡_.--- ì.r1!ð J<br />
c_-:-_- !-- :-=-r ¿rr* ^¡r . h:;s i-.-si.l: i:: 1nc::ase,j<br />
shsd.din; cí th.sê ceils,<br />
li:e :.e lucticn in ceil nu;:'cer of -uhe sñell intestine<br />
cer 'ce ¿itr-JbuleC to CecreêseC r-ate cf cel-I jcr'::.tion er.d./ cy<br />
increasaC r.êt3 cf celi lcss. ihe inci-e:s:d râte cf ceil 1oss<br />
t¡rcul-d lilie1;. be the first l'êsFons3 cf the sr:ail intestine tc<br />
Ði'ot:::l :=fici:nc'' i.:. e shcrt t3rn ccr:t:.o1 ì-:-cci:â::ls: . ì=-<br />
crease C rete oí ce11 fcrria-uicn a nci ceIl lcss wi'l f prcbabt:¡<br />
beccne noi'e croninent ês proieir: defic:enc,,, ccntlnues íor<br />
longer FÐi'iods cf tine. lhe 1¿tter nechanisi: j"epresent s e<br />
long t -^r'::l ccnti.ol- nechanis;:1. äoope r et al. (Lgí!) :nd tÌ.crdn<br />
et al. (L963) obser\¡ed sl-c'¡er cs11 r.ener.;el of th-: intestinal<br />
cells and reir;-c:C nisl.aticn cí cel-ls f:.cn s¡¡,ç¡5 tc the ti_p oÍ<br />
the vil-li during aCvancei stêges of prct:ir ieficierc¡..<br />
ll:e rr:l'ious irt:rlretation of î,i:nts t:kin¡ rlec: in<br />
the snal-l- ínt,estine utcn feeCing cf loui ll.ctein or p:.otein-frae<br />
C:3ts rrculd ':e oí us: i.c the an1:el c¡r-- Íi rk-e reducticn i-<br />
cel I :rur'ce:. is rct accc:pa::1ii ì-,- :educ:C a'csc:":tior .oj e r:c_<br />
3enous cr eÏo,g€ncus ?ainc acids . iel_e : s: cf the injir¡idual_<br />
enino ecids 'c-.' tl:e proteol¡rtic enzr.¡nes cf the iiEestive<br />
trâct retl':z' than êbscr-pticn of :-ninc acids il"cn the snall<br />
int--stin: ci ti., ¡ig ur:s icunC tc':e:"al: ií:itl::: i:: tl_+ ut.i_<br />
liz¿tion ci prctqin åt +.he int?stin?l- le'..:- ( Z|'crc,,ts, q. -i c^'r '^ I<br />
, .t i t " t'' t<br />
li':r'te{ s:cs ,.f th: sn¿l_l intestine frcn ¡¡ct:in deçIate:<br />
anir"tel s r¡e¡': ÍcunC tc t i":.nspoÌ--i, er:ino acids :c¡e ra¡idi,, into<br />
'I Ãt
the sac than from well nourished rats (lierskovic , 1969;<br />
Kirsch et aI ., 1968). Therefore, the increase in absorplive<br />
154<br />
capacity of the reduced number of celrs in the smalr intes-i:ine<br />
durins protein deprivation nray partially compensate for the<br />
reduction in absorption due to celrurar ross. Tn addiiion,<br />
the intake of protein-free dj-ets by the test animals is<br />
usually much lower than that of nore baranced diets and less<br />
epithelial cells will be necessary for absorption of the<br />
digestive end-products.<br />
Snoot< (19ó5 ) studied rhe effect of the feeding of<br />
protein-free diets on the content of proteolytic enz],nes in the<br />
pencreas of the rat. Compared to cesein, e protein_free diet<br />
depressed the pancreatic content of chynotrypsinogen and<br />
tr¡rpsinogen. Tn addition, digestive enz,"-me s were found to be<br />
less rapidly inactivated (by autodigestion) in the snaIl<br />
intestine when diets containing protein were fed (snook and<br />
ì,ieyer, L964 a and b). Peptides of dietary origin seened to be<br />
responsible for the decrease in autodigestion. Consecuentl:¡,<br />
the feeding of proteín-free diets wiIl resuLt in reduced<br />
enzyme secretion from the pancreas and in faster inactivation<br />
of enzymes secreted into the intestinal lunen. The lov¡er<br />
enzyme aciivity, ín turn, nay result in a reduction in digestion<br />
of endogenous proteÍn that is derived fror¿ shedcied nucosal cel_ls.<br />
The v¡ork by Snook (1965) shows that enzyne secretions<br />
are reduced when protein-free diets are fed. Therefore, one
hÌould expect underestination of netaL,olic i1eal and faecal<br />
ånino acid leve1s when determined by the use of protein-free<br />
diets. îhis seems to be in contradiction to staternents nade<br />
earlier that protein-free diets overestinate metabolic ileal<br />
and faecal anino acid levels. However, one should keep in<br />
nind that protein derived fron digestive secretions nake up<br />
155<br />
only a snall proportion of the total endogeneous pt otein<br />
(Table 50). In addition, one maj/ expect the digestibi].it¡r of<br />
enzyne protein (by eutodigestion) to be higher thån that sf<br />
protein from shedded nucosâl ce1ls, The enz],rces secreted by<br />
the digestive tract are lrsÍnpl]¡r¡ folded peptides, rvithout<br />
undigestible protein co¡xponents that are associated with nucus<br />
protein or cellular membr:ane naterial fron shedded epithelial<br />
<strong>fn</strong> addition to the 1evel of fiber in the diet, the<br />
t.t'pe of fiber was found to affect the netabolic faecal nitrogen<br />
excretion in pigs (T,ihiting and Eezeau, l-95}a), .{s the Cietarl,<br />
level of pure wooC celluLose (So1ka-F1oc ) .r¡as increased frorn<br />
5 to 10 to I5,4", the level of netabolic faecal nitrogen inc¡.easeC<br />
fron .10 to .14 to .I5 grams per lOO grams of dry natter intake.<br />
Raising the dietary level of nethocel in protein-free diets<br />
fron 7 to 14íj increased the metabolic faecal nitrogen excretion<br />
fronr 0.0ó to 0.07 grems. Protein-free diets containing 14 and<br />
2€l' oat hulls resulted in ¡retabolic faecal nitrosen exc:'eticns<br />
of .09 and .1/¡ grans per 100 grams of dry ¡natter intake
esp:ctivel--,'. The actual cruCe fi'oer conten_.:s of solka_ÍIcc,<br />
L,.<br />
-..c -^i L--JU-- h^^ô l c.r:u ^É^ u- ^^+ r. :.,;1ls r¡:êre êiFrcxi::ateI:, i: , 9.A and ;C;i<br />
eâc¡'^r'i"âr" -L^<br />
",,<br />
_!j Ciff::'e:Ìces s-t\,cr in _¡1 netê'a3l i.:tjLai,___ ie fr.c¡l rit-¡:-¡ .-__. _r_n<br />
excretion bettreen the three fiber sou.rc3s tr3re stlJ.l r,-:r;r<br />
:r¡il3::t vihen ti€se 1r€r€ correcteC for ecual cruCa fi-cer<br />
Al ohafloc 1"."'a s the sou:"ce cf f i.ber use.d. in the se<br />
stuCies fcr the deterninaticn of netebclic ileat enC faecel<br />
anino rcid 1:'..e1-s. The conposition of cruCe fib=r (or that<br />
cf acid and neutral-detergent fiber r¡rhich r:ore closell.r Ì.elata<br />
to the absolute anount of unCi€:estible Cietar; dr;., natter<br />
conte nt ) of Aì-ph:fl-oc na;r be cuite diffe:,ent frc!:r thât oí<br />
crud: fiber of ct"her sources, such es fron cereaf grains.<br />
îhe differences in concosition rvould b:,ing about different<br />
lhl¡sicaÌ characteristics v;hich woulci result in iifferent<br />
ph¡'sioloEical and/or nut:.itiona1 responses 'o;' the *uest ani:::als<br />
upon ingesticn of the diets. Cr.ude fiber. i.s conpcsed of<br />
cel-1ulose, J.igni.n and other poll.,sacchårlCes in .,-a::ie^bIe e::cunts<br />
Cepending on the source ol crude fiter. fh=re were i::ge<br />
dlf f erences betr¿;een the con-¡onent s o.f cr.ucie fi'cer' in abíli"t.,'<br />
to :'etain nat:i. anC to forn gels. Cellulose 1^râ- s least e'c13<br />
to ¡'etain weter (ì¿s¡v;ood, ì-973 ).<br />
.l.s r¡as explainei previousl;,, th? test iiet r.iill be<br />
diluteC 'c1' Cige sti.,'e ;uices Curin¡¡ its passa5e tì:rcueh th:<br />
stcr:ach, duodenun and. upper je;unun. <strong>fn</strong> adciition, water '¡ril1<br />
756
from the epitheli-al cells into the 1unen. Fron the upper<br />
t57<br />
;e.iunuri on to the end of the ileur;r (and to the anus), water<br />
v¡ill be reraoved bv absorption. The degree to whi_ch water wi_ll<br />
be absorbed na¡r depend on the type of unCigested dietar¡,<br />
conponents renaininE in the end of the snall intestine i.e. the<br />
t¡rpes of undigestible components in relation to their water<br />
holding capacíties. As the water holding capacity of the<br />
remaining digesta decreases, presurnably the extent of ph1,,síca1<br />
abrasion of epithelial cells by the digesta i,¡ill increase anC<br />
vice versa. ln addition (when the r^¡ater holding capacity is<br />
low), the physical pressure of Cigesta on the intestinal v¿all<br />
will be increased and this r¡or-lld. result in increased peristal-tic<br />
activit¡r. The latter, in turn, will cause nore friction be-<br />
tlr¡een the digesta and the epithelial cell r,¡all , the re'c7 in_<br />
creasing the ph¡rsical abrasion of ce1ls. ihe r.elationship<br />
betr^;een nucus secretion and perist:1tic activit.v is not known.<br />
Hov;ever, it !-s reasonable to assune that digesta that is<br />
difficult to move needs more rnucus for lubrication purposes<br />
so that passege is eased.<br />
I1eal digesta f,rom the cereal diets seemed to be of<br />
a nuch more rrliquidrr nature than digesta fron the protein-f:,ee<br />
and maintenance diets. Linf ortunatel]¡, dry nratter contents<br />
were not neasured. The ileal digesta frbn the cereal grains<br />
flovred r¿¡ith ease into the collection bags ciuring sanpling.<br />
ï1eal digesta fron the protein-free and maintenance diets were
of e thick, ..'iSCcr-'.s and Sr-ickrr nåture . The sr::-f I in;est 1::=<br />
seon=C tc l:..'e dlfiicult;' in nc'.'in-: ti: il-ea1 di5este Îr'ct<br />
these di:is intc the collecticn ':a¡s, ilccke:: cccu.Ì.reC ât<br />
tin=s Cu:'in. ccllecticn cf ileal Ci:":sta frc:: tl.rse iiets<br />
and flow haC tc i:e essist:d scrretin?s 'c.' a¿:it1i. íi r,ishínl<br />
'¡':ic:" irtc tl.r il+:1 cân:tu1ê?.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> sLlrie r"' , prctêin-íi'e e iiet s ci a cc::tposii.i,on<br />
si;iilar :o thê cnes us=C in tl,ese stuiies, neji ccnceivabì;¡<br />
:---c4.r.-¡ ^rrc:.:ras in ti.e :rUCri_tlOn¿i ¡¡a r:l-.-.si ¡ì ¡:..i e¡.<br />
r:echanisils cperâ.¿ing in the s:r¿l-I in¡es'iine , col:pa-reci .,vith<br />
those tal
such and to detei'nine factors affecting the metabol_ic losses<br />
from the aninal . Secondl¡r, protein-free díets are used to<br />
deternine the n¡¡intenance losses of nitrogen (urinary plus<br />
L59<br />
faecal plus cutaneous nitrogen losses ) . The latter is inportant<br />
for the assessnent of protein needs for nraintaining<br />
aninals or adults (l'.unro, L969 ) and for the differentiation<br />
between Frotein reouire¡:ents for growth (and/or producticn)<br />
and those needed for naintenance. Ðepending on the type of<br />
protein-free diet used, rnaintenence losses of nitrogen deriveC<br />
from faeces ma.v actua11.¡ be overestinated.<br />
Certainly, knowledge of "retabolic ileaÌ and feecä1<br />
anino acid leve1s (and generall¡r speaking those of other<br />
díetary ingredientS) is of iaportance. I{ovrever, to sa¡r the<br />
1east, the use of protein-free diets for arriving at these<br />
estír¿ates should be reevaluated. Future studies i.e. bi.' aid<br />
of isotopes, malr be warranteC .to study this topic.<br />
, 0n a practical basis, í.e. for forräulation of<br />
dietary amino acid Levels in relation tc requirenents for<br />
r¡onosastric anirnals, it is not inportant to have separate<br />
knowledge of the arÂounts of undigested and./or unabsorbed<br />
díetary and rnetabolic a¡:ino acids. Eoth sources of anino aciCs<br />
(protein) are lost to the aninal The detarmj.naticn of apparent<br />
amino acid availabilities will_ be sufficient.<br />
ïn the previous discussion ¡ììost attention was paid.<br />
to the estimetion of true ileaI an:ino acid availabilities.
. 160<br />
True faecel availabilities werê not discussed. Interpretation<br />
of calculated true faecal anino acid availabilities would be<br />
more ¡risleading since an edditionaL error cones into plel./,<br />
nanel¡r that certain ânino acids are s¡rnthesized by the flora<br />
in the large intestine upon feeding of protein-free diets.
STUÐÏ L.<br />
The result s obtained frcn stud¡.- l*'r rvill be discussed<br />
prior to those of stud:. 4e.<br />
The ileal- nitroqen ând ,Cr:,' natter iigesti'cilities anC<br />
the ilea1 a-¿ailabilities of al1 anino acids lvere hJ-gher for'<br />
finel-'r grounC than for cracked r,;h e at- (Table 51 ) . For no s',,<br />
anino acids, these increases vrere significant. The increased<br />
availabilities were due to 1) the absence of cracked or<br />
'oroken feed particles that r,¡ould have escaped physical<br />
digestive breakdown in case cracked u¡heat was fed anC 2) fine<br />
grinding nay have resulted in an increased release of aleurone<br />
protein fron the aleurone cells and n:ore of this protein na:¡<br />
have been available for diqestion.<br />
161<br />
The first reason for increased a.¿ailabilities of anino<br />
acids fron finel¡,' ground over crecked ïheat is shown in Table Jó.<br />
ïhe dietarl.' particle size distribution of fíne1¡.' ground and<br />
cracked wheat is reflected in the particle size ciistribution<br />
of j.leal digeste. Cnl1' 5i, oî the p:rtlcles 1n ileal digesta<br />
frcn f inel¡i grounci r.rheât ldere larger than 1.0C ¡:n. iioriever<br />
approxinateL,v 25f of the pa:'ticles in i.leal digesta fron<br />
craci
TABLI 51. The apparent i.l-eal and faecal amino acid availabilities from ground and<br />
cracked wheat in addition to the digestibÍlities of amino acids in the<br />
large intestine and the differences in percentage units between ileaI<br />
and faecal amÍno acid availabilities<br />
TYPB OF<br />
PR]I- PROCESSIIIG<br />
LOCATION<br />
AÌ,1nr0 ACIDS (ø)<br />
Essential<br />
HÏS<br />
ÏLE<br />
LEU<br />
IYS<br />
PHE<br />
J. nlt<br />
VAL<br />
lJon-Essential<br />
--ÏÏî--<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
OLY<br />
PRC)<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
92.O<br />
91.1<br />
90.2<br />
ol Ã<br />
dr É<br />
oro<br />
83.7<br />
88.6<br />
82.L<br />
82.8<br />
95.3<br />
8r .7<br />
84.5<br />
88.2<br />
89. I<br />
IrrrnocuN (i3 ) 88.4<br />
DRY I:ATTER (f ) 80.4<br />
I<br />
.)<br />
o, ,.<br />
9l+,1,<br />
9r.2<br />
92.9<br />
85.3<br />
ô?Ã<br />
88.7<br />
9r.3<br />
87.r<br />
87.r<br />
97.8<br />
90.1<br />
95.9<br />
93.3<br />
90,7<br />
93.4<br />
88.8<br />
GROUND<br />
3 0.0 2.2<br />
37 .L 3.3<br />
lo.2 1.0<br />
ß.5 1.4<br />
2O.5 3.8<br />
8.5 0.6<br />
30.7 5 .O<br />
aa 1 a.7<br />
27 .9 5.0<br />
25:.O U.3<br />
53.2 2.5<br />
t+5 .9 8.4<br />
73.5 11.4<br />
t+3.2 5.I<br />
8.8 o.9<br />
5r.7 Ãrl<br />
t, t c1 8.4<br />
86.5<br />
àF n<br />
85.6<br />
87 .6<br />
.ia A<br />
89.4<br />
78.0<br />
Òr.r<br />
7l+.5<br />
ar7 ')<br />
9l+.L<br />
7 l+ .l+<br />
83 .8<br />
84.7<br />
85.3<br />
CRACKED<br />
93.9<br />
93 ,9<br />
89.9<br />
92.I<br />
B3.B<br />
92.9<br />
87 .3<br />
9O.5<br />
54,8 7.r+<br />
57 .3 8.2<br />
29.9 t+.3<br />
36.3 4.5<br />
t+O.g 1t.2<br />
33,o 3.5<br />
t+2.3 9.3<br />
43 .8 7 .t+<br />
86.5<br />
86.?<br />
97 .6<br />
89.8<br />
96.3<br />
9o.3<br />
90.6<br />
92.)<br />
88.8<br />
t?.r 12.0<br />
39 .2 8.9<br />
59.3 3.5<br />
60 ,2 L5 .tr<br />
77.2 r2,5<br />
36.6 5.6<br />
36.1 5 .3<br />
49 .7 7 .6<br />
5L.7 12.0<br />
Di.ge stibil itie s of amino acids, nit.rogen and dry matter in the large íntesti-ne.<br />
Differences in percentage units between ileal and faecal amino acid avail-abiI itie s .<br />
Differences between ileal anino acid availabilities from finely ground and cracked wheat.<br />
8l+.7<br />
76.8<br />
H<br />
o.<br />
t\)<br />
c3<br />
ÊE<br />
E'<br />
1.t<br />
3.9<br />
dÕ<br />
J.)<br />
EÊ<br />
'lt<br />
7.3<br />
o.7<br />
).5<br />
l+. 5<br />
1n<br />
3.6
(îab1e 5I). Lysine, GLT and ALA are relatively high in<br />
aleurone protein. Phenylalanine, GLU and PRO are reletively<br />
low in aleurone protein (Tabte 2 end 33 ). Ëxtrapolations<br />
as tõ PRO end GLY with regard to increased availability of<br />
aleurone protein for digestion due to grinding should be<br />
L63<br />
considered carefulll' since these 2 anino acids are found in<br />
relativel;r high amounts in netabolic il.eal protein.<br />
the faecal amino acid availabilities v¡ere onl¡r slightly<br />
and non- signific antly higher for finely ground than for cracked<br />
lvheat (Îable 51 ). therefore, it is very diffícult and<br />
unreliable to ßeasure differences due to rrpre-processingir b;r<br />
sÍnpl¡,r evaluating faecal digestibility rûeasurenents. Additional<br />
rneasurernents, such as urinary nítrogen losses or rate of gain,<br />
should be carried out concomit ant1y. The latter findíng is<br />
in agreement with data that inciicate that availabilitl¡ values<br />
determined bl' faecal analysis ere generalh,<br />
higher tHan tiro se<br />
deter¡:ined by grovrth methods (de lluelenaere et aI .,1967i<br />
Nesheim and Carpenter, 1967i Pâyne et a1 ., 1968). The ileal<br />
and faecal availabilities of LYS fror: ground wheat Ciffered<br />
onlir to a sna1l extent (81 .5 anA 85Jí¿). Tn this case it<br />
would hâve ¡nade littIe diffe:.ence if LYS evailabilitl¡ had been<br />
deternined by the gro!,th or the faecal- anelysis nethod (Tab1e 51 ).<br />
The net disappearance of anino acids in the large<br />
intestine !,râs higher for cracked than for finel¡r grounC wheet<br />
(TabLe 51 ). A higher leve1 of undigesteC starch fron cracked
l¡rheat entering the large inteslíne may have allowed for e<br />
higher leve1 of microbial fernentation and amino ecid dís-<br />
16t+<br />
appearance. 0n the other hand, sir,rpl¡r ¡nore nutrients in general<br />
maJ' have been available for microbial ferrnentation.<br />
the results obtained from finel¡r ground and cracked<br />
wheat of stud:.' [b âre compared vrith those of ground wheet from<br />
study l¡a and v¡ith those of cracked t^rheat fron study 2a (Table<br />
5?). Even though different varieties of wheat v,¡ere tested, the<br />
ilea1 amino acid availabilities of cracked wheat fron stuCl: 2a<br />
and 4b conpare very well . The i.leal availabilities of ar¿ino<br />
acíds from ground wheat in studl,' 4a were betÍ,een those o'otained<br />
fror,r finel1, ground and cracked wheat frc¡r study l+b but vrere<br />
closer to those of finel¡"' ground urheat. The conparisons of<br />
results fron studíes 2a anC l¡ shovr the reproducibility of data<br />
as the:.' relate to the t-r'pe of rtpre-processingtr of wheat and to<br />
the methods for determining ileal ar¿ino acid availabilities.<br />
iíoreover, the differences betr.¡een the ilea1 anino acid<br />
availabílities frorc corn, wheet and barle¡r in stuClz 2a v¡ere not<br />
only ¿¡s to the type of cereal grain tested but also to t.he<br />
rianner of rtpre-processingtt to v¡hich each cereal grai-n vras<br />
The ileal ariino aciC availabilities decreased fronr<br />
flour to rvhole wheat to E+S+¡: (Îab1e 53). The LTS availabilities,<br />
in particuler, decreased fron è1r.2 Lo 79.5 to 66.1+.<br />
L¡zsine availabilities fron flour, detern:ined ei-ther by
TABLE 52. Comparisons of ileal and faecal amino acid availabitities fronr wheat from<br />
studies 2a and l¡ as affected by the type of pre_processing.<br />
LOCAT TOI'I<br />
TYPI OF<br />
PR.E- PROCESSTNG<br />
STUDY<br />
A}TÏNO ACTDS<br />
Es se nt i.a 1<br />
ARG<br />
HTS<br />
ÏLE<br />
LXI.I<br />
LYS<br />
PIIE<br />
TIIR<br />
VAT-,<br />
--TÏr_-<br />
llon-Essential<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
I t{1<br />
(/")<br />
4b<br />
86.5<br />
ÒE a<br />
85.6<br />
87 .6<br />
72.6<br />
89 .4<br />
78.0<br />
83 .1<br />
NTIROCEN (il ) 84.7<br />
DRY r,',.AT',1'rR ffi) 76.8<br />
CRÂCI(EI)<br />
2e<br />
85.8<br />
89. r<br />
85.3<br />
ÊÁo<br />
dd a<br />
/o,)<br />
82.8<br />
7t+.5 74.0<br />
7V.3 75.4<br />
9t+.1 92,7<br />
14.4 lJ. /<br />
8¡ . g 8ó.8<br />
84.7 84.1<br />
85.3 85 .9<br />
C, c)<br />
/J.J<br />
]LEUI,T<br />
l*b<br />
92,O<br />
91.1<br />
ont<br />
9L.5<br />
81. 5<br />
92.9<br />
à1 .7<br />
88.6<br />
82.1<br />
oJ.Õ<br />
oà 2<br />
dì .l<br />
dr È<br />
dd ,<br />
89.8<br />
CROUND<br />
4a<br />
87.1<br />
88 .4<br />
ecJ l<br />
Roo<br />
79 .5<br />
9r.5<br />
78,1+<br />
86.7<br />
79.6<br />
80.8<br />
95.6<br />
7 2.6<br />
86.3<br />
89,2<br />
88. lu 85 .2<br />
80.ò 7à.2<br />
4b<br />
93.9<br />
o?Õ<br />
89.9<br />
or 'l<br />
83 .8<br />
oto<br />
87 .3<br />
90.5<br />
Òo.)<br />
97 .6<br />
89. B<br />
96.3<br />
on?<br />
90.6<br />
c]ô1<br />
88.8<br />
CRACKED<br />
2a<br />
92.7<br />
o,, o<br />
89.4<br />
o1 (<br />
80 .7<br />
92.5<br />
86.7<br />
88.9<br />
84.0<br />
83 .1<br />
97.o<br />
89.3<br />
oA,1<br />
Õ, Ã<br />
AoÃ<br />
9r.2<br />
89. o<br />
FABCES<br />
4b<br />
94,tt<br />
94.1+-<br />
9L.2<br />
oro<br />
d-<br />
02Ã<br />
88.7<br />
9t.3<br />
87. r<br />
87.L<br />
97 .8<br />
Õnr<br />
95.9<br />
90.7<br />
93.4<br />
88.8<br />
GROUIID<br />
9t+.6<br />
o?o<br />
9r.6<br />
o?,<br />
86.1<br />
or"<br />
89. r<br />
9r.7<br />
BB.1<br />
88.0<br />
o?o<br />
90.6<br />
96.8<br />
94.)<br />
oro<br />
93 .3<br />
89.4<br />
F c¡.
TÀLLì' 53, Appa¡ent ileåI ¿ûd feecê1 ênino âcid avêi1âblllties, in eddition to nitroE:ên<br />
ånd dry ri;:tte¡ digestibilitics and the disê¡peârance of these substences in<br />
the Lêrge intestine.<br />
Dïra]'<br />
Âriruo ÀctDs (f)<br />
Dssentiâ1<br />
/iRG<br />
H]S<br />
IT,E<br />
L¡U<br />
Ï,YS.<br />
I:EÎ,<br />
PIIE<br />
TIA<br />
vÁL<br />
Non-llssentía1<br />
A5P<br />
cru<br />
CLY<br />
PRC<br />
s¡n<br />
TYN<br />
¡irrRocEN ß )<br />
DNY I:ATTIR II)<br />
FI,OLIN<br />
rLEUìi FA¡cEs L.r.I a,2 rl¿u¡l ¡^Ec,rs L.t.1<br />
87.1<br />
88.4<br />
89.1<br />
89,9<br />
7 .q.5<br />
92. t+<br />
9r.5<br />
78.tt<br />
¿6,7<br />
7c).6<br />
80.8<br />
95.6<br />
72,6<br />
79.r<br />
86.3<br />
89.2<br />
e5,2<br />
7 8.2<br />
9t+.6<br />
93 ,9<br />
9t.6<br />
93.2<br />
86. r<br />
93 .4<br />
9t+.)<br />
89.r<br />
9L.7<br />
d8.I<br />
88.0<br />
97,9<br />
90.6<br />
96.8<br />
94.)<br />
89.1<br />
l{HoLE tlr.rEl\T<br />
56.6 -7 .5 9a.'7 95.<br />
47 ,1, -5.5 93.9 96.<br />
22.9 -2.5 93.9 9t+.<br />
32.7 -3.3 9t*.6 95.<br />
32.2 -6.6 81,.2 86.<br />
L).2 -1.0 93 .? 9).<br />
)2.9 -2.8 95.5 96.<br />
t+9,5 -10.7 85,4 92,<br />
37.6 -5.0 92.7 9!.<br />
52,7 -n.9<br />
4t,.3 -2.7<br />
t3 . r -0,I<br />
16.7 -o.9<br />
11.¿ -r.8<br />
I05,d +o, J<br />
17.8 -o.8<br />
t+7.3 -6.9<br />
2r,9 -7,6<br />
ö4. ö 90. O<br />
78,5 ¡tÊ-É<br />
72.9 j L.6<br />
7.1r.t, iè.2<br />
9!.& 7 5.5<br />
2!.9 tL.) ?r.j<br />
76,0<br />
1*1.7 -8.5<br />
65.7 -r8.0<br />
84,? -l?.?<br />
5t,\ -8.o<br />
3t+.3 -3.7<br />
5L.7 -B,I<br />
57.tr -IL.2<br />
86.1 90.8<br />
85.5 Ê).2<br />
97,9 98.6<br />
7.8.5 9),6<br />
dJ.o 98.5<br />
91.7 95.8<br />
93.7 9)+.4<br />
90,5 96,r+<br />
9o.2 95.o<br />
33.8 -t+.7 7A.2 ? 5.5<br />
25.5 -3.7 69.8 ?5.6<br />
33.3 -A.? 85.8 f,9.9<br />
?a.2 -r5.1 57.3 78,3<br />
9r.2 -r5¿5 ?AJ At.t<br />
t+9.9 -i+.1 72.2 n3.I<br />
18.8 -1.3 71.1 ?8.8<br />
62.r -5.9 69.8 Bo.9<br />
t*9.o -d,I 43.3 65,0<br />
1 Digestibilities of ar¡i¡o acids, nitrogen ãn¿l dr-v mâtter 1¡¡ the lêrge intrestine,<br />
2 Differences betrveen ile¿I end faecãI estim¿tes,<br />
3 Determíned by åcid bydrolysis.<br />
^2<br />
Er S+l<br />
tLDU¡f F^xcEs L.r.l az TLIJUj: FÀ¡cf,s<br />
D.r.SJît (D )<br />
3t+,2<br />
tr7.9<br />
6.3<br />
16.¿<br />
27.r<br />
1S.0<br />
14.6<br />
37.7<br />
I5.2<br />
-5.2 7r.5 9o,2 65.6<br />
-10.1 73.6 88,0 54,5<br />
-r,'t 69.6 7i.5 rg.tl<br />
-r+,3 7L.? 8c.? 3o.r,<br />
-9.1 57.5 ?7,6 t+7.3<br />
-t+.() 76.5 ?3.2 11,+.0<br />
-3.5 ?3.9 St.5 29.r<br />
-17.3 47.ü 7t+.7 5r.5<br />
-t+.7 66.5 ?8.2 3t+.9<br />
17.8<br />
r9.2<br />
28,9<br />
t+9,2<br />
61.6<br />
39.2<br />
25.6<br />
)6.8<br />
3e.3<br />
-5.) 60.7 76.2<br />
-5.6 6r*.2 78.2<br />
-r+.I 61. Â ..a.9<br />
-21.0 11,9 79.3<br />
-r9.2 -t+?.5 78.1<br />
-r0.9 67,7 ¿4.2<br />
-?.7 68.5 ?8.6<br />
-1r..r 59.2 83.0<br />
-27.? 69.2 e) .9<br />
39.9<br />
3r.L<br />
\3.2<br />
69.(<br />
¿5.t+<br />
5r.r<br />
32.r<br />
5e.)<br />
t+7 .?<br />
a.2<br />
-r4.t,<br />
).3 .)<br />
-26.9<br />
-II.7<br />
-r5.5<br />
-14.0<br />
-7 .r<br />
-47,t+<br />
-L?r.e<br />
-to. t<br />
-10.1<br />
¡¿ o\<br />
o\<br />
-7L.7
L67<br />
ileaI or faecal collection, were very sin:ilar. Calhoun et al<br />
(1960), using rats, found the LTS availabilities frorn flour to<br />
be 84.5% and 82.O'fr using weight and carcass nitrogen gain<br />
respectivel.v as the method for measurement. Their estirnates<br />
cornpere verJr well to those found in these experinents,<br />
irrespective of measurenent by ileal or faecal collection.<br />
the relativel;r low LYS availabilitl' 6¡ flour (TabIe 53)<br />
elíminates the notion that LYS availability from cereal grains<br />
is solelir deter¡ained by the amount of LYS present or associated.<br />
with aleurone cells. The relativell' low availability of LTS<br />
frorn flour in relation to the availabilities of the other ar:íno<br />
acids may possibly be due to the large number of lys1r1-pro1¡zl<br />
peptide linkages found in flour. These peptide línkages are<br />
completel¡r resistant to trypsin dÍgestion (page 14 and 15).<br />
Generally, the disappearance of amino acids in the large<br />
intestine increased from flour to whole uheat to E+S+i,l (fable fi).<br />
Tn other word.s, the lower the availabil-ities of amino acids at<br />
the end of the ileum, the nore the faecal availability estinetes<br />
will deviate from the ileal availabilities, ïfith the exception<br />
of THR, the faecal availabilities of the essential amino acids<br />
maj¡ still reflect the ileal availabilities on a qualitative basis<br />
(i.e. the order of least availability).<br />
As was discussed previousl]¡, the ileal availebilities frcm<br />
whole wheat were dependent on the t.vpe of ltpre-processingn. l¡hole<br />
wheat vrâs ground through a 2.AA a¡n screen in this study. If the
¿iheåt had been crackeC then larger Cifferences in anino acid<br />
availabllitj-es betvieen those of vrhole u;heat and flour niê]¡ wefi<br />
have been observed. If the whole wheat had been fineli., gz.ounci<br />
(as in studv 4b), the availabilities obtaineC ;:i6h*" have<br />
approxirnated those of flour (Table 5l and 53). The ileal<br />
availabilities of flour are unlikel1.' to be inpr.oveC b.¡<br />
grinding anC therefore represent naximun values. Flour, as<br />
obtaÍned, was alreadr¡ of a ver:,¡ pohJderl' ccnsisteilcr,'. The<br />
!+S+i.: Ciet vras not ground prior to pelleting. Consecuently,<br />
there nighi be an inprovement in a¡:ino acid availa'oilities<br />
fron F+S+il over those obtained in this study (Table 5j).<br />
i'ihcle rvheat rvas milleC tc gíve 75i: ll-aúr, anC 25i<br />
Ð+S+¡.1. Therefore, the total anj.ount s of the individual anino<br />
acids froa flour (x 0.75) plus those oi E-S+ì,. (x 0.25) should<br />
be eoual to the total'arîount of the individual anino acids<br />
.l_oõ<br />
contained j.n ¡¡hole viheat (x 1.0). The recover;' of the seperate<br />
aa.ino acids fron flour plus E+S+i: ês a percentage of those in<br />
whole wheat ranged fron 9l+.0 to 10L.Ol (:a¡fe 5¿r).<br />
The level of eech anino aciC found in i1ea1 digesta<br />
derived fron 100 grans of whole v;hear- should be ecual_ to that<br />
de:"ived fron 75 grans of flou_r' plus that frari 25 grans of E+S+::.<br />
The latter v,¡ould be the case if no associative or other<br />
unspecifi3d effects occur.<br />
The ileal levels of e¡rino aciCs derived íron lCO grans<br />
of whole wheåt can be calculateC frcn the inCividual anino aciC
ÎAELE 54. The recover]trof anino acids fron E+S+ì.; end flour<br />
(colunn A),-in addirion to the ifeaf aninJ ãJiAavailabi-lities<br />
fron Ë+S+II that were neasurecl<br />
n nr ÎÌt.lÀ1<br />
.À.:IINO ACTÐS (i)<br />
Es s ent ial<br />
._-ffiitj1U<br />
HÏS<br />
LËU<br />
LYS<br />
Dt-'l<br />
TI"R<br />
-vAL<br />
llon-Issential<br />
--ì-fl.i-<br />
À eI]<br />
ctü<br />
GiY<br />
r¡! \.,/<br />
SfR<br />
-L -L -rL<br />
directlT (colunn E) and those of E+S+ii that vüere<br />
calculated b]' Cifference fron crackeC v¡heat and<br />
flour (colun:n C ) and froi,r finell,. ground vrheai<br />
and flour (colunn Ð).<br />
oA.'<br />
104.0<br />
103 .0<br />
102.0<br />
96.0<br />
102.0<br />
oÀô<br />
I00.0<br />
84. I<br />
/ë.)<br />
Ja t)<br />
7 4.t+<br />
66.t+<br />
,71 è<br />
Et l\<br />
I !.)<br />
102.0 70.2<br />
95.o 69.e<br />
102. C 85.8<br />
97.o 57.3<br />
102.0 70.3<br />
103 .0 72.2<br />
9¿*.0 7L.l<br />
ïhe recovery of the individual<br />
E+S+I,: as a percenteFe of those<br />
Q^ ,j<br />
60.7<br />
67 .4<br />
,/.t<br />
AàA<br />
11 n<br />
A^A<br />
rL "'<br />
Ac '1<br />
,70 '2<br />
Aà.<br />
co. /<br />
ar\ )<br />
dE ^<br />
,74 1<br />
È)A<br />
/ l.ó<br />
84.0<br />
70 n<br />
75.4<br />
?c aì<br />
ù6 J<br />
ö / .\<br />
oaa<br />
ò1 t<br />
aräino acids from flour plus<br />
in u¡hol-e wheat.<br />
]69
availabilities and the Cietary leve1s. The ileal levels of<br />
anino acíds derivéd lrom 75 grams of flour can be calculated<br />
in the seríe mánner. The ileal excretion levels fron 2l grans<br />
of E+S+ll are then calculateC by difference from those derived<br />
from lOO grams of whole wheat and ?5 grans cf flour. As the<br />
170<br />
dietar-v level of each a¡:ino acid in E+S+Ì!i is known, the<br />
availability of each amino acid can be cal-culated. These<br />
calculations were carried out using ileal anino acid availabilj.ties<br />
from finel-r' ground and cracked wheat (Table 51 ) in order to<br />
arrive at maximun and minimum possible aruino acid availability<br />
estimåtes respectively from E+S+l{ (Table 54\,<br />
the minimun possible essential ileal- arnino acid<br />
availabilities from E+S+ii ranged from 57,7 far LYS to 8O.?* for<br />
ARG. The maximurn availabj.lities ranged fron 77.8 for LYS to<br />
90.7% for THR (lab1e 54). Therefore, the potential availabilities<br />
of amino acids from E+S+Ì.,Í may approxinate those of whole v;heat<br />
(Tab1e 5l ) .<br />
',¡/ith the exception of ÎHR, GLY and PRO, the directllz<br />
determined amino acid avâilabilities for F+S+li were found to be<br />
between the minumura and maxinum calculated availabilities fron<br />
E+S+¡.':. Threonine , GLY and PRO are Fre sent in relative large<br />
anounts in metabolic protein, e1'en at corrected levels<br />
(rab1e 47, 48 and 49). The directly deterrnined availabilíties<br />
of these three amíno acids were all lower than the calcu.lated<br />
estinates. Fiber l-evel as such has been shown to affect the
I7L<br />
¡ìletabolic ileal a¡nino acid 1evels (ia¡fe ¿*5 ) . The l_e,,,el cf cruCe<br />
fiber of E+S+l: (8.49Í) was ,ruch higher than that of whole wl:eat<br />
(z.l;i\ or.fl-our (C.z5l,). The calculatlons for- the avaílabilities<br />
of E+S+l: were based cn differences betrr,een ileal<br />
amino acid levels fron ¡¡hole wheat and flour anC na-r, have<br />
resulted i"n over: s t imat ion of ileal ava il ab ilit i-e s<br />
o f TIiR , CLï and pp.O.<br />
The calculated availabilities of the other a¡rino aciCs<br />
v¡e¡'e in the râng? of those found directl.¡. This latter would<br />
onl',' occur if the Cilution of '-rnCigested ÍleaI dietar¡., anino<br />
acids b¡r the enCogenous arnino acids (¡'1¡¡ the excer,tion of<br />
!liP., CLY anC PF"C ) was of e r-elatíve1.1¡ sna1l propo:.tion.<br />
In or"de:. to obtain nor"e deta cn the availabilities<br />
of aninc acids fron E+S+l,î (since onlj¡ I sets cf results were<br />
available ), the Ê+S+ì: diet was dil_uted with 6Aí, cornsterch to<br />
give the E+S+i:-D diet. The ileai availabilities oí al_l anino<br />
acicis íron Ê+S+;.:-D r,^,'er e lo¡ier t,hân those of Ë-S=ì- (:aì:ie 53 ) .<br />
lhe availabilities oí .tì"G, tLï and ?RO in per*riculer v¡ere nuch<br />
lower. These a;iino acids a:-e also r¡erl- prci;:i_ne nt in :etabol_ic<br />
íleal pro"'ein (Ta'cle 45 ) .<br />
The higher intake of rhe Ë+S+-:-D diet (Ió49 g/iai,,) than<br />
of the Ë+S-l^ diet (831 S/aa:.) by the pigs coulC have been<br />
p::'tiallir responsible for ihe loiver il-eal- anino acid avai-labilities<br />
cbtained froa E+S+ì:-¡. DietarS' end aetabolic protein r,.¡il_ 1 be<br />
retained for a lon¡"er period of tine in the snall intestine r¡¡hen
-iocd intalie is l- c,nr then when icoci intake is high. lher.eícre ,<br />
v:ì:n int;l:e is 1c:,:, ::icre r,i:e ¡:i11 'co F3rîiitcd fcr ji;=s."icn<br />
end sbsorption oí p:.c'',ein and oth€r nutrients.<br />
Difíerences in i-leal enino aciC er¡ailabiiities anc<br />
nitrogen Cigestlì:il-ities shcul_d. 'ce cie -uectei ií there l.;ere<br />
i'el:'.ive1;' Lar¿.- .,rtirtlc::s in Cletari. intake c;. pigs íes ¡i_e<br />
sa¡:e dieis, The ciietarl. intake cf the pi;s _i:d ¡_S-...-D veried<br />
.frc:r ¿ nin,i:xun cf L)?6 ¡/ o.ey îcr pii nc . 1 t o a ::xiEun ci<br />
134-l ¡o. p j.r nc. !. ihe il-eal nit:.c3en ci-gestibilities r¿:ei-e<br />
aZ.t) ?nd 4e .9,- îor pig no . i ancì ! respec+-ivel;r. Generalli.<br />
sFeal
1n:i;ii',:..1- -"::irc acÍd ¡'.-;ileiiI1'. 1.:s ::n::ì i:.c: l.ã i:r ?-C<br />
lrstcr Qç7) ) fec cc:':: io 15 ',:; p,i.:s, at â :.atc :-î<br />
!.5 .g ;e r .r:; 'cocÌ-. r+eight . <strong>fn</strong> the preseni studies, corn v;:- s ied<br />
to the pigs e" an app;:oxirête Ì'rte ci 27 g Fer l.: r ':cC;' r+eight.<br />
-l-^ ôr.^-^-^ .,'l^-l<br />
^--i-^ ^^.i.ì ^.-^.il-:^ir: _--t i-.: s c¡r¿ined :r- rh:<br />
L/,)<br />
FÌ'esêllt stildi3s uere l-!.6 pei.cenrag: unirs i1*-i¡,;: rl:a:: t::cs:<br />
:':t¿1:rei 'c; :';stcr (Lç:2). ll: dijfe:'enc:s i:: percenrage .;n.i s<br />
Íoi' ihe inci.¿iiual a¡:lino :ciC :-r-ail-¡.tlIities b:tween the tv¿o<br />
s:uiie s ranêird i¡cr. L0.2 io:' ll-ì to 2j.2;', îor C-- (lrtle LI).<br />
-r-J r'r=1 :!: _c:udr (<br />
l:st=i' (!91 )I Ïiâs cri" !..1,1 I cv::r t.e:1 tliet c'c-r:inel 1:r<br />
f iô ê- c+r:.ì i ô <<br />
Tire ileal :nino acii availa'oilities cbtainei ícr<br />
ber1e.,' in 'uhe present studies lrere r,'er]' siril_a.r. tc thcse cbtained<br />
b:. i:Crchls-ie \L?'i) å, . '^\ - r /r^Lr^ ,r \ :<br />
1 i,e.r--- +L t . L:.:l_:.1- '.,;:- s feC tc the<br />
p1¿s et el:1ost ihe se::e rete i:: 'ccth s',-'.:_die s , ::anel-' :t 2: ani<br />
'lC e::err.¡ ii¡d'¡ r',e i,ght in these stuiies anC t;:ose b-,<br />
-J. ¡ -¡:e¡=¡r¡ r,:1''<br />
Frc¡l the data CiscusseC it see::s th.¿t dieterl' intake<br />
(1;: re l-:.tiar tc ioi¡' l:igrt ) :a;' alsc 'ce : fectcr 1:: istsr::-lninî<br />
eninc ecid. ar.'eil-â'cil-itie s et ihe enC cÍ tLe 1t eui:r. .liiíe ¡ences<br />
¡ì:e tc intake r¿.' nct al-'.,ra:'s '¡e detectei, or cni¡. tc e-' Iesser<br />
e:.tJ::t , '..rin êïiïìo âcij al-ail,;'ciliti. s e:e iet:r.:i"nei c-'<br />
+'.ê _'.3ê.1 r-::lr:ci q *¿'i¡J -l.a '=l-f ¡-¡ *¡¡+,¡l.ii^- ,..^.,1.ì<br />
lnd;ca'.e tì::t i::oi'e is relativcl-' ::c:e ',.iåste.î: c-î lrcte:n oi
cÌi.t erl,' end/or r.et-abolic orisln ( causecì 'c:¡ rlcr.cbial fêrien_<br />
tetion) in the lerge intest ine et highe:. then et l-ower fcod<br />
jntakes. Ìhe¡.efore, in certain cases, the large intestine in<br />
adciition to the liver na¡,' also contribute to the ceanination<br />
cf excess protein i.e. *hen protein inlake exceecs the enount<br />
re cuired. The cuestion rxa:,¡ be asked nc.u.r, lvh¡, ¿o." ihe aninal<br />
I7l+<br />
nct êxcrete the excess Fl.otein es such in the faeces? lhe<br />
'b.,'-products of protein netebcl_i,sn in -,,he I arge intestine, .øhich<br />
are nainl¡r short chain vclatil_e fatt;r acids, rla-v still be of<br />
use to the aninal . these conpolrnds na,, be used as precuisors<br />
for glucose or for fat s¡'nthesis. <strong>fn</strong> ed,lition, nicrcbial<br />
fernentation in the large intestine will nake volatile fâtty<br />
aciCs, produced frcn unciigest j-ble carbchydrate sources,<br />
a'i.a ilable to the eninal_.<br />
ihe ileaI a.¡aila'oilit j.es of ani.no acíCs r¿;hich are<br />
relativel.,' high in netabolic ileal protein (Åp,G, GLï a.ni pi.O )<br />
rrere especiallr¡ lcw from Ê+s+l--l in relation to those obtai::eci<br />
froil Ë-S+ì. (iable 53 ). A change in the ra.te cf passage ,urouli<br />
particula'i.' change the avai-labilities o.f anino acics fron<br />
rrotej.n that is alread;". of e relatively low digesti'cilit;,,<br />
such as protei.n iron sloughed-ofi cell_s cr Íi.on trucus.<br />
'-în the other hand, ccÌ.nsterch as such na¡, have be en<br />
responsible for the high levels of netabolic ileal protein<br />
founC at the end of the ileun u:on _feeding of the E+S+1._! ûiet.<br />
-{s for -ihe nâintenance and prot.ein-free Ciets, ilea,l pF;C ani
GLY Ier.els were elso found to be relatively high ín ileal<br />
digesta frorn E+S'i1-D (Tab1e 53 ) . It rnay or rnay not be coincidental<br />
but all these diets containeC óCf cor.nstarch.<br />
L75<br />
Casein was fed (24.3 ne. nitrogen per 100 g body weight)<br />
with ancÌ l¡ithout different carbohydrates (167 r:rg per 100 g<br />
bod5, ws1*¡a) to rats (Euraczev¡skí et aI.,l97Ll . The rate of<br />
stonach er.rptying of casein ou." o".l]"ld when corn dextrín,<br />
glucose, soluble starch, sucrose or Iectose (in ascenciing order )<br />
vrere the carbohyCrate sources. Iiowever, the rate of stonach<br />
emptl/ing of casein rves .increesed when cornstarch v¡as the adcied<br />
cerboh]¡drete source. The euthors releted the differences in<br />
rate of stoaach er:rptying of casein to ciifferences in solubiliti'<br />
end rate of absorpt.íon of the carboh¡rdrates. Possibly, the<br />
increased rate of stonach enpt,l¡ing of casein due to cornstarch<br />
inclusion (v¡hich is very soluble and rapidli.' absorbed ) na¡.'<br />
heve resulted also in an increase in rate of passege of Cig=sta<br />
through the snal1 intestine. As v¡as r¡entioneC previousll',<br />
increased rate of pâssage of digesta through the smalL intestine<br />
na¡r especialll"' ¿""".""e the digestion and reabsorption of<br />
endogenous prote in.<br />
Differential losses of anino acids j-n the large intestine<br />
(due to rcicrobial fermentation) caused by Cifferent types of<br />
carbohl"'d¡¿1es may have sone effect on the nutritional status of<br />
the anínal i.f the diets fed were 1ov¡ ín protein or deficient<br />
in â particular anino acid. The F.E.l..ts (protein efficiency
176<br />
.11'ì<br />
ratiots) Ìrere 0.93', 0.9C' and O.!l¿ when Ciets conte ining Z[fi<br />
wheat gluton and either 6Cfi cornstarch, dextrin cr glucose<br />
respectivell¡ were fed to rats. <strong>fn</strong> the sane ord.er, the p.i.R.rs<br />
.))t<br />
t^rere 1.6L', I.5g' and 1.54' when the diets were supplenentei<br />
with LYS (Chang, tg62),<br />
Although there may be other explanations, the effect<br />
of corns'r"årch (in reration to possi-ble increased rate of pessåge<br />
through the snall intestine ) na¡' þyp1"in the lower p.E.?.. found<br />
when cornstarch rather than dextrin or glucose lvas íncluded in<br />
the non-LYS-suppleniìented v,iheat gluten diets.<br />
it ma5' have been coincidental but true ileal anj,no<br />
acid availabilities fron E+s+¡:-Ð courd be obtained in such a<br />
rcenner thai true PRO and GLY availabilities obtained di.d not<br />
exceed 100f. The availa'oilities of these anino aci-ds were close<br />
to those of the other amino ecids (Table j5). Coffections for<br />
netabolic ileal anrino acid levels were based on equal crude fiber<br />
levels per 100 grails of dry rnatter intake for the E+S+1.:_Ð and<br />
protein-free diets. The crude fiber 1eve1 of Ë+S+::_D 0,e¿f"l<br />
vres very close to that of PF-5 ß.86/"1 . iherefore rnetabolic<br />
ilear anino acid data frorn FF-J were used.. Generall.v speaking,<br />
t,trt,.". 9.f the. glucose- containing diet was significantly<br />
higher than that of the cornstaich containin[ diet. -"<br />
2P.2.p,. rs were not significantly different.
TALLE 55. It'tç -a_pparent ileal amino acid availabiritiesl from Ê+,s+li-D ancl<br />
E*S+-l'ir in addition to the estimated true availabilities from B+S+L-Ð.<br />
DTi!T<br />
AVATLABILTT]ES<br />
Ar,l]No ACTDS (Í)<br />
Bssential<br />
lJì-rne-iIls<br />
lLx<br />
LEU<br />
LÏS<br />
IIET<br />
PTiiJ<br />
1'¡{R<br />
VAL<br />
Iion-Ils senti a 1<br />
--TÏ1-__<br />
^ aÐ<br />
GTU<br />
CLY<br />
PRO<br />
JJiI<br />
lYR<br />
I Ie ans and standard deviation.<br />
.APPARBI'IT<br />
4\:Zi 9't<br />
69.61 1.6<br />
nr<br />
tL. -*" /- L. -t<br />
57.5! 3.9<br />
76.5t 6.o<br />
T,9! r.3<br />
t+7 .8! 3.9<br />
66.5! 2.6<br />
6o.7! 5 .9<br />
6tr.z7 l.l<br />
83 .81 r.6<br />
3r.9+2r.o<br />
-t7.5+66.5<br />
67 .?! 2.8<br />
68.5t 2.6<br />
E+S+11-D<br />
82. L<br />
80. 9<br />
78.2<br />
80.1<br />
69.r<br />
81.6<br />
81 .7<br />
67 .z<br />
75.5<br />
'7t 1<br />
88.7<br />
Ao.<br />
80. 5<br />
1ta<br />
E+.Sr-1.1<br />
APPARììIJT<br />
8/1.8+ r.5<br />
78 .5: 2.6<br />
?2.9+ 2.3<br />
7L.I'! 3,o<br />
66 .t*t ¡r.g<br />
77.8! 3.8<br />
76.O! 2,5<br />
53.e+ 6.5<br />
7r.3! 2,7<br />
7o.z! o.z<br />
69.8+ r.z<br />
85. B:I 1.2<br />
57.3+ 5.9<br />
70.3{11.0<br />
72.2+ 2.r<br />
71.rr I .0<br />
ts<br />
-{<br />
-{
the true ileaI ar¿ino acid availabilities obtained fron<br />
E+S+i:-Ð hrere very close to the apparent availabilities frcn<br />
r78<br />
E+S+¡l fed es such. Indirecth¡, the latter indicates again<br />
that netabolic ilea1 anino acid levels of naturaÌ diets (such<br />
as E+S+l,i and cereal grains ) rnay be overestinated by lþs 115.<br />
of protein-free diets.<br />
the reason that rrtruerr ileaL anrino acid evailaL.ili_<br />
t,ies fror¿ diet E+S+Ì.:-D could be obta.ined na¡r þsgs been due to<br />
the siniLaritíss þst,¡¡sen the E+S+ì.:-Ð and protein-free diets<br />
with respect to certain nutrient(s). Eoth diets contained<br />
6Cl corns'rerch. the reason thet no precise rrtrue!r ileal<br />
enino acid availabilities (or associated ;letabori.c ileal- a¡:ino<br />
acid levels) could be obtained. fro¡: the cereal grains is<br />
probabl:r Cue to the fact that there was nuch l-ess sinilarit..,<br />
betr+een the cereal and protein-free diets. Eecause of the<br />
dj.fferences betv¡een these Ciets, different responses with<br />
regard to the ânounts of endogen ous þrotein secreted end.for<br />
di6ested and reabsorbed in the srnalI intestine urere eliciteC.<br />
Accurate deternination of rrtrue¡r ileal availabiliti.es<br />
is best ii the test and protein-free diets resenbre 3ecli other.<br />
For exanple, in deternining true anino acid availabilities of<br />
a protein source, the composition of semi-purified diet con_<br />
taining this protein source (i.e. at a leve1 of :-OíI) can be<br />
for¡rulated in identical nanner {with the exception of the<br />
protein itself) to that of the protein-free Ciet. iiowever,
in determining true amino acid availabilities of an<br />
energy-protein source (e.g. barle)'), the situation is Cifferent.<br />
I natural type diet will differ in a nu-nber o.f<br />
characterístics from a protein-free diet.<br />
179
SlUÐÏ 3<br />
r80<br />
The apparent availabilities of anino acids fron barle¡,,<br />
corn and Ì¡heat (Tab1e 40) and those of whole wheat, flour and<br />
B+S+ii (Îab1e 53) were found to be higher when they were deter_<br />
nined by faecar analysis than when they were determined by ilea1<br />
analysis. The differences between ireaL and faecal availabilities<br />
were found to be dependent on the type of diet and on the npre-<br />
processingtt condj.tions these di.ets were subjected to prior to<br />
feeding. Differences between ilear and faecal esti-mates were<br />
more pronounced for some than for other anino acids.<br />
The apparent faecal arnino acid availabilities from<br />
sorghurn grain and corn were higher than those obtained at the<br />
end of the ileum fron pigs fitted with ireocaecer re-entrant<br />
cannulae (Easter, Lg72). Generally speaking, apparent amino acid<br />
availabilíties of sEI,l and RSI¡] were higher when they were deter-<br />
mined from faecar collection than when they were determined at<br />
the end of the ileum of pigs fitted, with ileal re-entrent cannulae<br />
(Holnes et a1. , ].g?L). The average a¡rino acid availabilities<br />
based on i1eal sarnples from chicks that were sacrifi.ced<br />
were lower than those determined by faecal analysis (fvy et al .,<br />
1971 ; Filipot et a1. , LSTL; Soares and Kifer, l.gT].). Caecectomy<br />
of chicks significantly reduced the protein digestíbility of<br />
heat-danaged cod protein (l\iesheim and Carpenter, it961).<br />
The anino acid availabilities determined by the faecal<br />
analysis nethod may overestimate the amounts of ami,no acids that
181<br />
are actually absorbed by the animal . Eaeterial enz],nes in the<br />
large intestine brÍng about the hydrorysis of undigested protein<br />
through peptides of decreasing length to free amino acids.<br />
These free amino acids may be elther absorbed as such by the<br />
aninar or they nay be fermented furthe¡ by the nicro-organisms<br />
to yield arnr¿onia and carbon skeletons. The rate of deaminative<br />
fermentati.on varied from anino acid to amino acid (1.|che1 , 1966).<br />
The extent to which amino acid absorption versus dearnination<br />
takes place in the large intestine wÍIl d,eter¡rine which rnethod<br />
is ¡nore valid i.e. the faeeal or ilea1 analysis method.<br />
These experi.ments were carried out to deter¡:ine the<br />
extent to whích IYS was absorbed as such in the large intestine.<br />
Lysine was either caecarry infused as a part of the rsp protein<br />
complex (study 3a) or as free LyS monohydrochloride (stud¡r lb).<br />
Lysine was serected since ít is often the first limiting an:ino<br />
acid to pigs.<br />
The B+2JSP diet is representative of a barley_soybean<br />
pig grower ration. Reducing the tevel of soybean meal by half in<br />
the grower ration will resurt in a decreased. rate of gain by the<br />
pigs. The decreased rate of gain can be largety overcome by aid<br />
of LYS supplementation (Bell , I96ta; Eowland, L)6Zi Braude et aI .,<br />
1972; Nellson et a1 . , 1963).<br />
The levels of LTS that were found in the caecal contents<br />
after infusion of rsP or free LTS v¡ould be nuch higher than those<br />
found under normal conditions. Therefore, a situation was created
whereby there was ample opportunity for substantial LyS<br />
absorþtlon in the hindgut with a resultant improvenent in<br />
tBz<br />
nitrogen retention- rt was reasoned that if only a s¡naII re-<br />
sponse in nitrogen retentíon took place upon LyS infusÍon, then<br />
LYS absorption in the large intestine was of littre ímportance<br />
under normal circumstances.<br />
The amount s of nitrogen retained. per dalr were Ig.O0,<br />
15.80 and 15.91 e. for E+2ïSp, B+TSp and E+fSp+C-lSp respectivellr<br />
(Table 29). In the sane order these values represent !:2.5\,<br />
98.8 and gg.4 g. of protein deposited per day. 0n the assumption<br />
that the average protein content of the pigrs body tissue<br />
is L6%, then the average daily gains would be 703 , 6L7 and, 6Z2<br />
g. for pigs fed E+2ISP, E+fSp and B+fSp+C-fSp respectively.<br />
sinilar calculations ca*ied out on data obtained from study lb<br />
will give the following daily rates of gain: 693, 6OO and 613<br />
g. for B+rsP+Lys, E+rsp and E+rsp+c-Lys respectively. xxcluding<br />
the calculated missing value, an average daily gain oî 607 g.<br />
would be obtained for pígs fed E+ISP+C-LTS (Table 31).<br />
The data obtained from study 3a and jb for B+fSp<br />
compare very well (Table 29 and 3I). The amount of nitrogen<br />
retained per day from B+2ISP was only slightly higher than that<br />
obtained from B+ISP+LTS (Tab1e 29 anð.3I).<br />
Nitrogen retentions and biologícal values were higher<br />
lNit"og"n retained per day times 6.25.
for E+ISP+LYS than for E+lSp (Table 3I). Lysine was the<br />
liniting aruino acid in B+rsP and its addition resulted in rohrer<br />
amounts of the other a¡rino acids that had to be catabolized.<br />
183<br />
Nitrogen retentions and bÍological values for E+2ïSp were lor,rrer<br />
thân those obtained fron B+rsp (Table 29). since onry LTS was<br />
needed for supplenentation (E+fSp+LyS and. E+2fSp gave nearly<br />
similar responses wlth regard to the anount of nitrogen re_<br />
tained per day)r the other araino aci.ds contained in the l unit<br />
of fSP added had to be catabotized.<br />
For efficient protein synthesis, all amino aclds have<br />
to be si¡rultaneously present at the site where protein s]¡nthesis<br />
takes p1ace. ft can be argued that caecally ínfused LyS ma-v<br />
arrive at a different tine at the site of protein synthesis than<br />
the amino aclds from orally ingested proteín. possibty, this<br />
nay occur if the animals were fed once daily and the infusion<br />
had been carried out r.2 hrs. later. However, in these studies,<br />
the pigs were fed J tirnes daily and the ínfusions were pe'forined<br />
when the ani.mals were offered their ¡neaLs.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> study 3b, LYS was nÍxed with cornstarch to facilitate<br />
Lïs infusion Ínto the caecum. The caecally infused cornstarch<br />
rnay have stimulated bacterial activity, resulting in an increase<br />
i-n deamination of anrino acids (incruding caecally infused Lys).<br />
In retrospect, LTS should perhaps have been nixed with a fiber<br />
source from which energy is less availabre to bacteria than is<br />
the case with cornstarch.
The results obtained in these studi-es show that<br />
r84<br />
caecally supplied LYS did not inrprove the nutritfonal status<br />
of the animal . The amounts of nitrogen retained per day were<br />
nearly the sa¡ne for E+ISP, E+fSp+C-ISp and B+ISP+C_LYS.<br />
However, a small âmount of LTS absorption may have taken place<br />
in the large intestine of the pig. Slade et g!. (192I) showed<br />
that there was LYS absorption from the large intestine of the<br />
horse. However, the authorst did not measure the magnitude of<br />
LYS absorption (page 26 ).<br />
ïn surnnary, LTS availability determined by the faecal<br />
analysis ¡rethod overestimates the actual anount of LTS that is<br />
available for utj.lizatlon by the pig. There is no reason to<br />
asslxne that the othe¡ amino acids undergo a different fate from<br />
IYS (in relation to deamination and excretion of ammonia as<br />
urea in the urine) in the large intestine.
STUDT ]<br />
The amino acid cornposition of bran and endosperm<br />
a85<br />
fron high end lovr protein wheat fron stud;r I and that of bran<br />
(E+S+ll) and endospern (flour ) fron stud]' 4a are conpared in<br />
Tab1e 56. Aleurone protein contains reletivelj, high 1e.,re1s<br />
of ARG and LYS and relativel¡r 1or levels of GL'ú anC pF.O in<br />
relation to endospern protein (Tab1e 2). Therefo:.e, the<br />
efficiencl' of separation of aleurone anC endospern protein<br />
cen be measured b¡r the degree of difference in the ccnposition<br />
of these amino acids between the bran and endosper¡n fractions.<br />
As shown in Table 56, a better separation of bran<br />
and endosperm protein was achieved b5' the conventional nilling<br />
procesè (stud:¡ 4e) than by pearling (studl' l) of ,¡heat. This<br />
v¡as also reflected b), the verv low crude fiber content (o.25îi)<br />
of the endosperm (flour) fraction obtained in stud¡,- {¿.<br />
The separation of aleurone Frotein frora endosFern<br />
protein was n:uch better for the 1ow than for the high protein<br />
r^rheat (Tab1e 56) . <strong>fn</strong> ret.rcspect, abrasion should have been<br />
carried out for a longer period of time for. the high protein<br />
wheat, namel¡r for 36 instead of 2C seconds (T¡,ble 5). Therafor"e,<br />
e substantial anount of aleurone protein ma1,, have renaineC in<br />
the endospern fraction, resulting in ress distinct differences<br />
ín the ar:ino acid conposit,ion of ARC, CLy, GLi end pF,C between<br />
bran anC endosperra protein, Consecuentll', int erpre -.t.at i-on o-f<br />
anino aciC availabilities frcr: bran and endosperm fron the high
TA¡LE 5ó. The amino acid compositionl and crude fiber content. of bran and<br />
endosperm from studl. 1 and studl' lu¿.<br />
}.IU¡ÍBER OF STUÐY<br />
F'R¡.CTÏON OF<br />
C]IRBAL GIìA]N<br />
A}|]NO ACTDS<br />
Es sent ial<br />
--Ãrõ--<br />
HÏS<br />
ItE<br />
LÛU<br />
LYS<br />
PH[<br />
TI'IR<br />
VAL<br />
llon-lìssenti a1<br />
-.TrÃ.-._<br />
/\ cD<br />
CLU<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
J.!,.t1-<br />
TYR<br />
CRUD]J FIBER (ii)<br />
I t<br />
a<br />
I,<br />
4.86<br />
1.83<br />
2.9t,<br />
6,Lt+<br />
2.3 5<br />
4.1+4<br />
2.86<br />
4.01<br />
t+.r4<br />
E aa<br />
30.04<br />
l+ .7 I+<br />
ô ô,.<br />
4.48<br />
t ót.<br />
E ò,<br />
3 .81<br />
r.93<br />
3 .40<br />
7 .2r<br />
2.It<br />
5.rO<br />
2.t+o<br />
4.16<br />
1,
L87<br />
proteÍn krheat variety in relation to anino acid availabilities<br />
fron aleurone and endosperm protein should be considereC<br />
¡ ¡ v.o 1:r-l I r¡<br />
The apparent faecal enino ecid availabilities obtained<br />
from pigs fed r¿¡heat in study 4a and those fro¡i pigs fed vrheat<br />
in study 2 are compared with those obtained fron the rats,<br />
fed high end low protein wheat, in this stud,y (Tabl_e 57).<br />
lÍith the exception of the availabil-ities obtained<br />
frora 1ow protein wheat (11 .2i) fed to rats, the availabilities<br />
coapere reasonably well betv;een rats and pigs especialI1,, those<br />
obtained from pigs fron study 2 and those from rats fed high<br />
pro'r,ein vrheat ( Tabl e 57 ) . The differences betvreen faecal<br />
availabilities varied only from 0.3 for SEn to 2.f percentage<br />
units for ASP between these 2 studies. Ìt na;' have been a<br />
coinciden-ual- observation but the sane varietlr of wheat, nar.,e1¡r<br />
Glenlea, vres tested. <strong>fn</strong> addition, the protein contents of<br />
both C1enlea wheat sources were re1ativel.,. sinilar (Tab1e 5?).<br />
The differences between faecal availabilities were<br />
sonewhat larger when those from rats fed high protein wheat and<br />
t.hose obtained from the pigs from stud¡,, 4a were compâred, The<br />
differences ranged from 0.3 for PFiË to ?.Zf for l,ïS (TaL,Ie 57).<br />
ihe wheat sources in this compari-son, although not too Cifferent<br />
in protein contenl , h¡ere of a different varietl/.<br />
The faecal anino acid availabilities obtaineci frcn<br />
rats fed the f.ow protein v¡heat v¡ere lower than those obteined
I'AFL¿ 57. Cornparisons of apparent faecal a¡nino acid avaitabilities, in addition<br />
to nitrogen and dry måtter digestibilities, of wheat and'barley fed<br />
to pigs and rats.<br />
CER]IAI, CRAI}I<br />
LBVjIL OF<br />
PROTETN ('I)<br />
AI'IÏI.iAL SPiJCÏES<br />
A¡IINO ACIDS (/, )<br />
Essential<br />
Ãilo<br />
IITS<br />
]LE<br />
LEU<br />
LYS<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VÂL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
-Âïã--<br />
ASP<br />
G],U<br />
GI,Y<br />
Pn0<br />
SER<br />
1'YR<br />
ilrrnocrN (i!)<br />
DiìY r:ArTrn (l)<br />
I<br />
2<br />
)<br />
L5 .INI<br />
PIGS<br />
9l+.6<br />
ô? o<br />
9r.6<br />
93.2<br />
86.]_<br />
91.3<br />
89.1<br />
9L.7<br />
88.1<br />
88.0<br />
o?o<br />
90.6<br />
96.8<br />
9t+.3<br />
or o<br />
o? 2<br />
e9.L<br />
L6 f2<br />
PICS<br />
92.4<br />
9l+ .5<br />
Ao,<br />
9L.l*<br />
80. 3<br />
atA<br />
86.t+<br />
dd d<br />
83.6<br />
82.9<br />
97.0<br />
89. t<br />
96.9<br />
92.3<br />
82.5<br />
9r.2<br />
dd d<br />
!fIIEAT<br />
r8;3<br />
R,ÀTS<br />
tr,23<br />
RATS<br />
-ta o2<br />
PICS<br />
9L.2 87.8 88.4 82.3<br />
93 .7 90.8 89.9 87 .6<br />
90.4 85.3 81.3 79 .o<br />
92.7 89.4 85.t+ 82.5<br />
78.9 73 .t+ 7 5.5 67 .7<br />
94.O 90.8 87.L 86.0<br />
8ó. B 81.9 79.9 76.0<br />
9o.t+ 86.3 82.7 82.0<br />
85 ,z 80.9 76.1 73 .2<br />
85.3 79.r 76.3 72.8<br />
97.1, 95,7 92.r 89.8<br />
89. B 84.8 8r.2 76.0<br />
97 .3. 95.9 9r.7 9o.5<br />
92.6 89.t+ 85.6 82.8<br />
9r,8 85.6 83.8 B2.B<br />
89.7 84.1* 84.0 ?8.7<br />
90.3 88.8 82.7 83.7<br />
Da t a f rom stud.,r' l+a .<br />
Data from studl' 2: averåge of cannulated and non-cannulated pigs.<br />
Data from s l,udy 1 .<br />
DARLEÏ<br />
1r .43<br />
NATS<br />
çr q3<br />
RATS<br />
78.0<br />
70.6<br />
77 .3<br />
ó0.1<br />
78.6<br />
67 .8<br />
73.7<br />
67 .o<br />
6l .z<br />
84.1<br />
70.o<br />
83.6<br />
7l+.2<br />
na ù<br />
83.5<br />
F<br />
00<br />
@.
fror,r the rats fed the high protein wheat and the differences<br />
189<br />
ranged from 6.2 for iYä. and ASP to I.4l for pRC (Teble 5Z).<br />
For barley, the faecal availabilities for pigs frcn<br />
study 2 and those obtained from the rets fed the high protein<br />
þarrey do not conpâre too unfavourably. The differences rangeci<br />
fro¡n 0.7 for VA.L to 7.8fr for LyS (ïable 57). The barley source<br />
fed to the pigs was of the i-ierta variety while the high protein<br />
barley fed to the rats was of the Fergus varietl'. <strong>fn</strong> the sane<br />
order, the protein contents of these barley sources were 13.9<br />
and LL 4fr respeet j-vely.<br />
ïhe feecal amino acid availabilities fron rats fed<br />
the low protein barley soLlrce (8.5É protein) were rnuch Lower<br />
than those obtained fron pigs fed barlel' ,13.9í¿ proteín) in<br />
study 2 (Table 57). The differences rangeC from g.O fo¡. GL-uto<br />
15,4i¿ for LYS. Even though these barley sources vrere of the<br />
sane variety ( äerta ) , the¡, differed narkedl;,' r.rith regard to<br />
their. levels of protein. f!ì contrest , the Z sources of Glenlea<br />
wheat, thet viere fed to rats (18.31 protein) and pigs Oe ,3X<br />
protein) and resulted. i.n very siniler faecal a.railabiliti,<br />
estir:ates, were almost sinilar in protein content.<br />
The faecel amino acid availabilitíes fron rats fed. the<br />
high proteln barle-rr were higher than those obtained fron lot^¡<br />
protein barley (as for híg}: and 1ov,r protein wheat ). The dif-<br />
ferences rangeC fron 5.2 for LiL: to 8.6f for Sii. (Table 57).<br />
Generally speaking, faecal anino acid availabilities
ton<br />
frcl c:rcal- :i.alns iei to rats ani :i-s co:¡¡:-e reascna.ci.. .1.;.: Il_<br />
i-i c=rael ::'alns cc::t::ui"ng :r:l:c>:Í::etql'. si:ir a:- ::ctein ccniî:.t<br />
ât': ic: '-c ¿o:h s:--^cies. l¿=cel :..-.:ir:'cil._tl¡s ::a,. ccri".a:"3<br />
.1-:n ll3ttet' iÎ in aicitlon to ecual ci.ciein ccnt:nt the sarie<br />
i¡rr i,:f .¡ i c ¡â.l-ê-ì<br />
- :'r-"r. 1l 1^^ '<br />
, / j ) co:.?a:oi :ê3:al ?:::ta :c:a e',.âi1e-<br />
;\il-itie s lr=t-rilen ;:ars a:li ii¡-s lh.êt ',;:r:: i:.-., the sar:e soLi.t,c=s<br />
c-f '.';heat ând 'aêrlÊ.'. Ìhe e :t:cr. j::e nis c:. plls ê:il râts ,..jêt e<br />
ca::'i:d c'-:t :r:i:-: sir:il_a.r ::ç:.,.r:rentai c:::citi.o::s. icr r..:hea:_,<br />
ieecel a¡:lnc acid er;eila'cil-ities c'ltainei i:.c;r 'l:iqs ,".;erê sligh-ti;<br />
hi.-l:::' th:.:: tics: Í:c: :.ets, lh: dllfcie::cc -.'i:.:3: f;,oi: 4.î<br />
for LIS to C.2i" for li-lì 3nC iiis. lc:. la:L:-,, íaecai a¡:ino aciC<br />
¡'¡ail-a'cil-it tes c'.:ta.ined frcn t âts ./re:.î s1i-i:t1:. h"igh.:r than<br />
-ul--c se c'ctaiä€i jJ'c:1 pir:s and r.':ried jrc:.1 l.) îcr S_i lo C.l,¡<br />
f o: J-¡- . .',itl.cu.-h -g;ur. (l?71 ) jo':::d sc::e ii jl:r:nces 'c:tr.;=e :: p:_:s<br />
:i:i i':ts, tì:.,se clf.ie rences enc those c'ct¿ineC irc::: othe r cereal_<br />
¡r':i:ls ',;er: ¡i a s;:e1l- :'la¿;:i:.-r:e. lil ¡:::e :ai, r-:i_s ani;its<br />
-c-. '-.: :¡:'r'l l -: .ìc.,l r-¡ l-)"^ i,¿r= .i u- ^+^'*r Ldr::.rI:= -^!.i . -o:: -* ci faec:i_ ,,:i::c :-cll<br />
._-.i ¡^1ì ri!i.- __ -.^^-J..-<br />
:er:e_ .ire::ls.<br />
^ t ^,,-^*-.<br />
ìi ill'cgen digestibilltl' r,,;: s inc;'e:s-=e r.rith<br />
ccnterÌi cí di-i.fe¡':::i b:i'ie-.. sc-it-c3s i:i -,c<br />
!>,:.> ) . jll',tler cì's=i.;ai j-cns ì/..31 : :ale :r<br />
; cr l:i;;: s:li l-olr p:ct:::: 'ia:i:;r ,:r' -..:i""¿:<br />
pcstili-.."3i tc b: iue "'- c the iccr¡ase i:r<br />
---^+^¡ ^ l^^ ^ , ^:-
protein content of e cereel grain (see Fegê l-Z). Iìovrever,<br />
r9r<br />
ås t4re s shown in these studies (Teble 15 and 16), the nitrcgen<br />
digestibilitÏ (and ar,rino aciC availabilítíes ) fron endospern<br />
fronr high protei-n barle¡, (or r"¡heat ) v¡as also higher than thet<br />
obtained fron endosperm protein fron 1or.¡ protein ba:.1e.v (or<br />
wheat ). Therefore, in addition to en incree.se in the relative<br />
enount of aleurone protein there seems to be an increase in the<br />
anount of undiqestible protein from endospern (or flour) fron<br />
cereal grains as the protein content d.e creases (i.e. the overall<br />
protein digestibility is affecred).<br />
Ïn c oi'::pari-ng the data obtained fron rats ¿nd pigs it<br />
should be. kept in nind that there were diff=rences in the<br />
physicar treetnent of the cereal grains prior to feeding. iìor"¡-<br />
ever, as y¡e.s shown ín studi' l¡b, physical treatnent oí a cere¿l<br />
grain p:.ior to feeding haC only a ninor efiect, on anino acid<br />
availabilities es the¡' u'ere neasureC bi' the íaecal anâlj.s:s<br />
ro+l^aÄ<br />
f:L ir¡e ^<br />
e^+,^^;<br />
r:re ulods used for deterninir:g faeca.t ani::o acio<br />
availabilities fron rats and pigs rvere cuite different. ihe<br />
anino acid availabílities obtained fro¡r the pig lrere deternined<br />
by aid of the chronic oxide ¡:ethoci (Crarnpton and Ilarris , 1969).<br />
The amino e.cid availabilities obtained froi rats were deternineci<br />
by total faecal collection from feeding the *uest diets du:.ing<br />
a period cf l¡ consecutive cÌa;,'s. <strong>fn</strong>clusion of fer¡,ic oxiae in<br />
the basi-c ciiet (r¡hicl: v;as fed Frior to and fo1lor,¡ing the test
g2<br />
periods ) pernitteC somev;hat easier id en-uif i cation anci collection<br />
of faeces resulting fron the test diets. lioi,¡ever r a gradual<br />
colou-r change is usually observec íron red to that of *"he colou¡.<br />
of the faeces from the test diets. Ìo a certain extent, the<br />
anount of faeces çolleited r¡riIl be dependent on the colour<br />
appraisal by the inCividual collecting the faeces. Therefcre,<br />
this nethod íor ccllecting faeces is sonel¡hat sub,{ectiïe.<br />
Due to the r:roCif;ring action of the microflora of the<br />
J-arge intestine, data obtained fron studie s 2,3 and { inciicate<br />
that appârent ilea1 anino aciC avaílabilitj.es are a L-to Ì.e âc_<br />
curate ¡nea sure!:ent than apparent faecal a¡.¡ailabil_iti e s . lhe<br />
differences betl'¡een i-1ea1 and faecal anino acid availabirities<br />
varied from anino ecid to an:ino acid. ?ne differences were<br />
also found to be dietar¡' depenCent anci vrere also affected by<br />
the physical treatnent of the cereal gi'ain prior to feeding,<br />
For the essential anino acicÌs fron wheat i:i study 2a, the Cifferences<br />
betv¡een iIeal end faecel anino aciC, availabilities<br />
t^¡ere founC to -ì.e the lergest for TIiR, nanellr l-A.Z;:, an.d the<br />
snellest 9or ì-ìT, nanel. 2 J',:, eabL" t+O). Fo:' stud5, t¡a,<br />
the differences varieC from 1O.Zíj for îFl? to 1.0,,i for ,..,î<br />
(Table 53). The differences bet,¡een ileal and faecal ani-no acid.<br />
e,¡åil¡1bilitie s for ,¡heat fron studl: !¿ ancj. l+a Ì..¡ere nor€ oi, le ss<br />
the sane for each ar:ino acid. Therefore, the everege differences<br />
u¡ere used for arriving at estinated i.leal a¡:ino aci-c avai.labilities<br />
(by subtraction fron the faecal availabir íties) for the rats fed
the high enC lov¡ protein wheet sources (Table 53).;<br />
For bar"le¡r fed to pigs in stud.1.. 2a, the d.ifferences<br />
betv¡een ileal and faecal essential ar¿ino acid a-¡airabirities<br />
varieC fron 11.5 for IlfS to 0.5É for LET. These Cifferences<br />
were useC for a¡'riving at estinated ileal aninc acid<br />
availabilities for the rats feC the 2 barle;r sources<br />
The changes fron faecal to ileal anino aciC<br />
bilities for the rets tend to ¡nake LyS and îHp, about<br />
the least ar,'ai't able essential a¡nino acid (Table 5g ) .<br />
ïn general, the magnitude of the differences in<br />
Fercentage units of faecar anino acic availabilities betr¡een<br />
r93<br />
encospern: and bran decreased fron those obtained fron the v¡heat<br />
scurce fed to the pígs (studi. 4a) to those obtained fron the<br />
lovr protein wheat source end to those obteined fron the hÍgh<br />
protsin wheai sou-rce fed to rats in thís stucy (ia¡re 5g). rn<br />
the san:e ord.er, the a.,,erage Cifferences betrveen faecel enCosperrn<br />
end bran anino aciC availabilities were I).9, 6.g and ll.3<br />
percentage units respectivel:/. These differ3nces na¡., b¿ ¡¿"-<br />
tia11¡r explained b¡r the less efficient separation o.f aleurone<br />
and endospern protein fror: rvheat fed to the rats (especiall¡,<br />
that of high protein Hheat ) than fron roheat fed to the pigs<br />
( Table 56 ) . r-n add ition, t he bran Ciets f eC to the rêt s r,,,ere<br />
grounc thr"ough a 2.oo rßm screen prior to prepai'ation of cru:nbres.<br />
The bran fraction fed to pig;s v;as not Eround prior tc beirìg<br />
pelleted and fed. I'lorn¡ever, it should be kept in nini that<br />
(ra¡te 4o ).<br />
^-,-¡1^<br />
e c-uel ! I'
TAELii 58. Comparisons of .the apparent -i1eaf amino acid<br />
to<br />
availabilities, in adcÌition<br />
nitro€ien and drr¡ mãtter digestibilities of vrheat --'<br />
pigs<br />
and bariey feA<br />
and-the<br />
io<br />
esti¡näted íleal lalues for ratã.<br />
CIRBAL GRATI\J<br />
LEVIIL OF<br />
PROTEIN (%)<br />
A¡ITIiAL SPIICIËS<br />
A¡.irNO ACrDs (i¿)<br />
Essential<br />
ÃEe<br />
IJ I' Cì<br />
ïL jj<br />
LNU<br />
LYS<br />
P¡.IE<br />
TiIR<br />
VAL<br />
lìon-.lis sential<br />
ALA<br />
^ eD<br />
CLU<br />
I¡L.L<br />
Pn0<br />
o.uif.<br />
lYR<br />
rirrRccEN (i3 )<br />
DRY I;ATTDR (iJ)<br />
I<br />
2<br />
3<br />
r5.41<br />
Ptcs<br />
B7.I<br />
88.4<br />
89.1<br />
Qoo<br />
79 ,5<br />
9r.5<br />
7B, t+<br />
86.7<br />
79.6<br />
80.8<br />
o< Á<br />
/ ¿,c<br />
ðo. J<br />
89.2<br />
85.2<br />
78.2<br />
Data from study 4a.<br />
Date fron stucl¡r l¿.<br />
Estimat.ed data from studv I.<br />
16 J2<br />
PTGS<br />
I/HJìAT<br />
r o r3<br />
RATS<br />
LI.23<br />
RÂTS<br />
13.92<br />
PÏGS<br />
BARL]LY<br />
I:-.43<br />
RATS<br />
8.53<br />
RATS<br />
q2.9 q4.0 qo.6 81.5 71+.t+ 66.5<br />
qe.r<br />
qtJ 88.0 q5.r so.i ià:í 66'.t<br />
\z.t È,2.o 7g.i 75.0 66-.6<br />
99-? 8t.?. 91.t, 8í.t 77.u 7z.z<br />
71.7. 73 .6 q8.1 73 .3 63 . i tt-.õ<br />
9q. 8 eq.7 87 .5 sî.i so:i iá:'s<br />
26.2 82.8<br />
7.6.3<br />
8tr.3<br />
7.L.tr ?i.à 6t'.'S i?.é -6i'.1<br />
eo.z 7s.o 7i.i<br />
7+.o 75.9 7L.ç 69.7 65.5 5s.3<br />
7 5 .\ 'i7 .8 7r.6 ?L.z 66.i 6'o.i<br />
2?.7 et+.r 92.4 86.6 ú.i is-.6<br />
73^.2 72.? q8.q 7r.2 6tr.6 is.6<br />
qt.+ ::,.y 12.¿ q|.L<br />
q2.t<br />
ql.2<br />
Bg.C 79,r iz.z<br />
76.3 ?2.2 63.6<br />
85.9 88.1 81.9 ?9.1 Zi.S 6:9:ú<br />
9?-9 8\., 76.2 7L.s 72.7 61.6<br />
73.3 76.8 75.3 66.2 66.1, 66.á<br />
F<br />
\o
T'ABLE 59' comparison of faecal antÍno acid availabilities from bran and enclosperm<br />
from wheat fed to pigs and rats.<br />
ÂN]¡iAI, SPECTES<br />
FRAOTTOI!<br />
AUtr,Jo ltcrDS (i3 )<br />
Es sential<br />
ÂnG<br />
HIS<br />
rLli<br />
T;ITT<br />
LYS<br />
P}fE<br />
TIIR<br />
VAL<br />
lì on- !s senti-sl<br />
-1TÃ_+_<br />
ÂsP<br />
CLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
OFD<br />
TYiì,<br />
¡,VJRACE (i3 )<br />
1<br />
)<br />
l+<br />
ETTDO-<br />
SP¡JRII<br />
95.6<br />
96.6<br />
9l+,7<br />
95.5<br />
86.0<br />
96.3<br />
o, 2<br />
9t+.3<br />
90.8<br />
B9.z<br />
od Á.<br />
93.6<br />
98.5<br />
cià d<br />
94.4<br />
94.2<br />
90.0<br />
88.0<br />
7 tr.6<br />
,i çI 1<br />
?ô Ã<br />
7r.3<br />
76.O<br />
).o<br />
.7d<br />
2a.I<br />
1ó.8<br />
10. 5<br />
16.8<br />
2L.A<br />
18.3<br />
75.5 L5.3<br />
7 5.5 13 .6<br />
89.9 à.7<br />
78.3 l-5.3<br />
8.9 .5 9 .0<br />
Bl .1 12.7<br />
2à d 1É I<br />
, v. (J L).\)<br />
Bo.l l.3.9<br />
o, o<br />
9l+.6<br />
92.8<br />
9t+.3<br />
Qta<br />
95.4.<br />
89.7<br />
at 'J<br />
88.0<br />
9E.0<br />
O))<br />
98.0<br />
9tt.U<br />
Õ?2<br />
92.4<br />
ot t.<br />
93.L<br />
8z.o<br />
89. B<br />
76.9<br />
9L.7<br />
óJ.O<br />
lndosperm and bran indicate flour and Lr's+rìÍ respectj-very from study da.<br />
EncÌospern and bran obtained from high protein wheat from stud' r.<br />
Endospern and bran obtained from 1ow protein vrheat fron study l.<br />
colurins A, F and c indicate the dífference i.n percentage unÍts between enclospern and bran.<br />
à2, t,<br />
82.5<br />
96.0<br />
8ó.0<br />
95.5<br />
89. r<br />
BB.l*<br />
ë,tJ. -L<br />
o.5<br />
T,5<br />
Ê(}<br />
5.3<br />
5.r<br />
5.6<br />
2.O<br />
AA<br />
'E<br />
lr.9<br />
lt.3<br />
QDI]DIÌ<br />
88.7<br />
9r.9<br />
88.1<br />
91.0<br />
92.2<br />
öt. I<br />
88.6<br />
ç¡ì .<br />
Ba.5<br />
96.5<br />
dÁ. d<br />
96.8<br />
90.7<br />
87 .4<br />
B7 .8<br />
¡1]{ L)<br />
87.B<br />
B7 .9<br />
8¡ .0<br />
7r,4<br />
8r*. S<br />
7 t+.9<br />
80.7<br />
75.8<br />
7l+ .L<br />
9r.0<br />
89. o<br />
Òa^<br />
78.r<br />
8l-.0<br />
0.9<br />
4.0<br />
r0.l*<br />
8.0<br />
)^<br />
7.4<br />
êd<br />
6.1+<br />
5.5<br />
7.8<br />
dn<br />
9.3<br />
6.8<br />
H<br />
\o
L96<br />
cifferences in a¡rino acid availabilities due to ,pre-processin¿rr<br />
na¡r be pa:"tiall¡r eliminated bJ' the nicr oflora of the large<br />
intestine (es was shown in stud¡,' l¡b). A1so, the nethoC used<br />
^.<br />
1'or deternining feecal amino acid availebiÌities in the rêt<br />
studies was of a somewhat subjecti,re nature. The degree of<br />
error that can be connitted will depend on the total. bu.lk of<br />
faeces thet is collected. The latter depends on the dail¡.,<br />
dietar'-t" intalce, the dr¡,' netter digestibilit,l, end the length of<br />
tine a particu.lar test diet is fed. Therefore, in the r.at<br />
experinents one rita:¡ expect a I ar.ge:. er.ror fo/ endosperm then<br />
when bran is fed for the endosperm fraction has a nuch highe:"<br />
dr:/ ti:tatter Cigestibility than bran. Conceivebl¡i, faecal a;::ino<br />
aciC avails-lilítie s fron endospern fed to ret s :a¡., ha.re been<br />
rr¡Äarac+iac+¡zl<br />
As v¡as pointed out in the discussion pa:.t of stuCies<br />
2 and !, the u.se of protein-free diets for cat culatins true<br />
a¡:ino acid ar¡a ila'cirit ie s from cereal grains r:ay give nisleading<br />
values especially if true avail"abil-ities are cieternined b}' the<br />
faecal anall,5is netl:oci. The deternination of çpparen-" ieecal<br />
an:ino acici availabilities fron cereal grains ;rå)¡ heïe sone<br />
value. -i;ith the exception of îF.R, apperent ileal end feecal<br />
availabilities of essential anino acicis fro:r cereal grains io<br />
not difíer thet nuch especially if the greins vrere íineli, tround<br />
prior to feeciing. ConsequentlJ/, t ï',;e faecal arino aciC<br />
availabiiities from cereel grains fed -uo rrts have not been<br />
d.eternined.
SUI.4MARY<br />
The apparent ileal and faecal amino acid<br />
'ì o?<br />
avaiLabilit,ies fron corn, wheat and barley were deter¡ríned vrith<br />
6 growing tr4anagra barrows.<br />
Lysine was the Least available indispensable amíno<br />
acid when determined by the faecal analysis method, namely g1 .0,<br />
80.7 and 77.5y'" tor corn, wheat and barley respectivery. LysÍne<br />
and THR vrere approxinately equally the 1east available indispen_<br />
sable arnino acíds when deternined at the end of the iler¡n. The<br />
ileal LYS availabilities were gZ.O, 75.2 and 73.1/o îor corn,<br />
wheat and barley respectively. In the same order, they were<br />
78.9, 76.5 and 7l.2dc for THR. TLre apparent ilear availabiriti.es<br />
of MET were 91.9, 86.6 and BO.b/" for corn, wheat and barley<br />
respectively and were essentía11y sinilar to their faecal<br />
availabilitie s .<br />
The, apparent availabilities of tyS especially, and also<br />
those of lHR and MET, are of importance since these amino acids<br />
are present in limiting anounts in cereal grains. Generally<br />
speaking, the faecal analysis nethod is valid for determining<br />
the apparent availabÍlitíes of r,rs and MET. However, the faecal<br />
analysís nethod overestinates the availability of THR due to<br />
its relatively large disappearance i.n the large intestine.<br />
Tryptophan is also present in linited ¡nounts in cereal grains,<br />
especially in corn, and its ilea1 avai.lability should be assessed<br />
in future research.
The average amino acid dísappearance in the large<br />
'r oA<br />
inte sti'ne (as a percentage of amino acid Íntake ) increased fron<br />
corn to wheat to barley ând !¡a s 2.5, 5.3 and 6.0/o respectively<br />
for the índispensable amino aci.ds and 6.3, g.5 and g.g/"<br />
respectívely for the dispensable anino acids. For the indi_<br />
spensable acids, ARC, HIS and THR disappeared to the greatest<br />
extent. For the dispensable amino acids, d.isappearance vÍas nost<br />
marked for GLI and pRO.<br />
A separate study h¡a s carried out to detern¡ine if<br />
apparent faecal amino acid availabilities from cannulated pigs<br />
were representative of those that would be obtained from non-<br />
cannulated pigs. Essentialry no di_fferences v¡ere found between<br />
normal and cannuleted pigs fed the sane sources of corn, wheat<br />
and barley.<br />
the differences that were found between ileal and<br />
faecal amino aeid availabilities frorn corn, wheat and. barrev<br />
nay have been partially confounded by the type of physical<br />
treatnent each ce¡eal grain r*a s subjected to prior to feeding.<br />
1!ro dì.ets, nanely finely ground and cracked wheat, were fed<br />
each to 4 finishing pigs. The ileal availabilitÍes of all amino<br />
acids were higher frcin finely ground than fro¡c c¡acked wheat.<br />
The differences in pereentage units ranged fro¡n g,9% for LyS to<br />
0.7/" îor PRO. the iLeal availabÍlities of a¡nino acids, assoc_<br />
iated with or contained in retatively rarge anounts i.n aleurone<br />
cells (such as rrs and ALA), were increased the most upon fine
grinding. Those amino acids, associated or contained in<br />
10ô<br />
relativeLy 1ow amounts in areurone celrs (such as cLU and pHE),<br />
were increased the least upon fine. grinding. Dif.ferences in<br />
anino acid availabÍlities due to physical treatnent of wheat<br />
prior to feeding could hardly be detected by faecal analysis.<br />
More research as to the irnprovenent of amino acid availabilÍties<br />
upon finer grinding (and other dietary components such as starch)<br />
may be warranted for such cereal grains as barley or oats.<br />
Bar1ey and oats contain relatively more aleurone protein (as a<br />
/" of total- protein) than wheat or corn.<br />
The ilea1 and faecal_ anino acid availabilities from<br />
whole wheat, flour and B+S+M were determi_ned with 6 growing<br />
barrows. Generally, åppârent ileal and faecal amino acid<br />
availabilities decreased frorn frour to whore wheat and to B+s+M.<br />
The average availabilities of the indispensable amino acids<br />
were 91 .6, 87.0 and 72.9/" when determined fro¡r i1ea1 digesta and<br />
93,9, 92.O and 79.6/" when deternined on faeces for flour, whole<br />
wheat and B+S+M respectively. As was found in studies carried<br />
out on corn, wheat and barley, there was a greater disappearance<br />
of dispensable than of indispensable anino acids in the large<br />
intesti"ne. 0f the indispensable amino acids, ARC, HIS and THR<br />
especially, disappeared to the greatest extent. 0f the dis_<br />
pensabLe anino acids GLY and pRO showed the largest dísappear_<br />
ance. The average amino acid disappearance in the large<br />
intestine (as a % of anino acid intake ) increased<br />
fron flow, to whole wheat and to B+S+M and was 4.1, 7.0 and
8.4/o respectively.<br />
Lysine was the least available indispensable a¡oino<br />
acid of flour and whole wheat when determined by the faecal<br />
analysis nethod and was approximatei-y 86/" for both diets.<br />
Threonine was the least avairable indispensable ami-no acid<br />
froa B+S+M, namely 7L.3/" usíng the faecal analysis nethod.<br />
Lysine and THR were about equal Ín being the 1east<br />
availabLe from flour and whole wheat when determined on eaÌ<br />
digesta. The apparent availabilities were approximately /Ç<br />
and 85/" for whole wheat and flour respectively. Threonine<br />
nas the least avaÍlab1e indispensable amino acid fron B+S+M<br />
when detprnined at the end of the :-te.,¿n (5t+%).<br />
The hypothesis that the low LTS availability of<br />
cereal grains is due to the fact that this anìino acid is nainry<br />
deposíted in the proteín fractj.on of lowest digestibility (in<br />
albumin and globulin protein assoeiated withr/or contained in<br />
aleurone cel1s) is not completely valid. The apparent ileal<br />
tTS availability of flour (84.2/") was found to be only L.9/"<br />
2CA<br />
higher than that of whole wheat (79.5%). The difference berween<br />
ileal tYS availabilities fron flour and whole wheat would be<br />
approxinately ?.7/" if the whole wheat had been fínely ground. ïn<br />
addition, it was shown (indirectly by calculations) that the LyS<br />
availability of B+s+M may approxl.mate those of whole wheat and<br />
flour upon fine grinding of diet B+S+M. The relatively 1ow<br />
availability of LTS from flour may possibly be pârtly attributed
to the relative large numbers of lysylprolyl peptide linkages<br />
in flour which are resistant to cleavage by the digestive<br />
enzyne s .<br />
Anino acid availabilities deternined at the end of<br />
the ileum will give a nore accurate measurenent of their åctual<br />
availabilities to the animal than measurement by the faecal<br />
analysis method. Partial verification of this was obtained<br />
when LYS was infused into the caecum, as free LyS nonohydro-<br />
chloride or as part of the rsp-protein complex. rnfusion of<br />
LïS did not result. in an improve&ent in nitrogen retention<br />
(amount of nitrogen retained per day) over that obtained fron<br />
the pigs when they received no LyS infusion.<br />
rnterpretat i-ons of faecal amino acid avairabilities<br />
obtained frorn rats fed high and low protein wheat and barley<br />
sources and the bran and endospern fractions derived from these<br />
cereal grains, should be interpreted carefully because of the<br />
following reasons: 1) separation of aleurone from endosperm<br />
protein by pearling was far fron complete, especially that of<br />
high protein wheat, 2) the measurenent of faecal anino ãcid<br />
availabilities, from endosperm fractions in particurar, uay have<br />
been biased because of subjective measlrre&ents (corour appraisal)<br />
and 3 ) the faecal anarysis method does not accuratery measure<br />
amino acid availabilitíes, particularly those of ARG, HfS and<br />
especially THR (indispensable amino acids).<br />
Regardless of the previous criti.cisns, differences in<br />
)^1
apparent faecal anino acid availabilities due to protein content<br />
endfor variety of wheat and barley were detected. For example,<br />
the apparent IYS availabilities were 78.9 and 73.L/" for hieh<br />
and 1ow protein wheat respectively. In the sane order, they<br />
were 67.7 and. 6O.t/" for high and lov¡ protein barley. As men-<br />
tioned previously, ileal and faecal LYS availabilities would<br />
not differ that much in case the cereal grains had been ground<br />
relatively fine prior to feeding as was done in these studies.<br />
I¡lore research should be carried out to determine the ileal<br />
amino acid availabirities from different varietíes of particular<br />
cereal grains with varyíng leve1s of protein.<br />
Metabolíc ileal and faecal amino acid levels were<br />
determÍned by aid of I protein-free diets contaÍning 5, l0 and<br />
L5/" AJ:phafloc respectively. As the level of Alphafloc increased<br />
from 5 to I0 to I5/o, the average ileal level of the indispen-<br />
sable amino acÍds increased from .030 to .O39 to .Ol¡l grarns per<br />
100 graus of dry natter intake. <strong>fn</strong> the sa¡ne order, the average<br />
level of the dispensable anj.no acids increased fron .119 to<br />
,150 and to .151 grams per 100 grans of dry natter intake. The<br />
dispensable amino acids nade up the rnajor portion of the metabolic<br />
ileal anino acids, namely T5 to 8O/", The ]atter could be<br />
important in nínimizing the loss of indispensable amino acids,<br />
as a result of the processes of digestion (either by faecal loss<br />
or by deanination in the large j.ntestine ).<br />
0f the indispensable anino acj-ds, ARG, THR and LEU (in
descending order) were present in relatively high amounts in<br />
metabolic ileal protein. MethionÍne and Hrs were present in<br />
relatÍvely lov, amounts.<br />
0f the dispensable amino acids, pRO and GLy (in<br />
descending order ) rÀrere present in very high amounts in netaboric<br />
ileal protein. Proline and GLT nade up approxinatety 55 and<br />
16/o respectivery of the total amount of the d.ispensable anino<br />
acids present at the end of the il-eum when feeding the proteinfree<br />
diets. cystine and ryR, which are actually semi-di spensable<br />
aníno acids, 'vere present in very low arnounts in netåboric irear.<br />
prote in .<br />
)12<br />
there was a consistent net disappeârance of ARG, THR,<br />
GLY and PRO between the end of the ileun and the anus of pigs<br />
fed the protein-free diets. prorine in particurar and GLy disappeared<br />
to the largest extent (presumably due to nicrobial<br />
deanination). consistent net increases ürere found for rLE, LEU,<br />
LYS, !lET, PHE and ASP between the end of the ileu¡t and the anus.<br />
This was probabry due to de novo microbiar synthesis of these<br />
anino ac id s.<br />
Protein-free diets overestimate the lever-s of metaboric<br />
ileal anino acids that are normally associated w-ith the feeding<br />
of natural type diets, such as cerear grains. This conclusion<br />
was arrived at by obtaining rtrue' ileal pRo avairabirities (and<br />
in certain instances those of Gl,y and ARG) tnat exceeded lOOf,<br />
regardless of the type of corrections for metabolic ileal anino
acid levels carried out. Interpretation of calculated rtrue,,<br />
faeeal amino acíd availabirities would be even more misleading<br />
2AL<br />
than 'ttruen ileal amino acid availabilities since an additional<br />
error comes into play, namely that certain amino acids are<br />
synthesized by the flora in the large intestine upon feeding<br />
of protein-free díets.<br />
0verestimation of ¡netabolic losses due to the feeding<br />
of protein-free diets were postulated. to be due to increased<br />
cellular rosses of epitheliar cerls and./ or increased. nucus<br />
secretions. 0n the other hand, a decrease in the digestion and<br />
reabsorption of endogenous protei.n secreted into the rumen of<br />
the snall intestine, as initiated by differences in the rate of<br />
passage of protein-free and natural type diets, may be respon_<br />
síble. The overestimation of metabolic ileal a¡nino acid levels, as<br />
well as nj.trogen (and therefore also of rnetabolic faecal a¡nino<br />
acid and nitrogen revels ) is probably caused by a combination of<br />
the factors discussed, in addition to other possibre unidentified<br />
factors.<br />
Protein-free diets are widely used in nutritional<br />
studies on man and anlmals i..e. for the assessment of protein<br />
quality and the deternination of protein (anino acid ) requirenents.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> 1íght of the findings in these studies, the use of<br />
protein-free dÍets for arriving at netabolic anino acid losses<br />
should be reevaluated and nore detafled research is wa*anted<br />
on this aspect.
BÏELÏOGRAPHT<br />
AbransÀ-G.0., I{. Eauer and li. Sprinz. 1963.<br />
<strong>fn</strong>fluence of the nornal floia on mucósãl rnorpholog;r and<br />
cellular renewal in thë ileum. .a. comparison'of-gEir:,,iràe<br />
and conventional nice.<br />
Lab. lnvest. 12: 355 .<br />
205<br />
-Abro1 ,.I.i., D-.C. Uprety, r"r.p. Lhu-=a anci i..S. I{aik. I7T:- .<br />
òor_J_ rertatazer leveLs and protein quality of wheat grains.<br />
Aust. J. Agric. Èes. 22: t95.<br />
Agri-culture Ìjandbook no. 379. Ig7O,<br />
Forage fiber analysis.<br />
Agricultural -Reseàrch Service, United States<br />
Ðepartn:ent of Agriculture.<br />
Al1i.son, il. J. I97A.<br />
Nitrogen.rnetabclism of r'¿minal micro-organisrns.<br />
T+ lP¡¡..+g]9ey of tigestion ¿nd ì-etabolis: i:l ihe F.u:rinant,,.<br />
å.'r . phil_lipson, ed ) . Oriel_ ?ress Linited.<br />
i\ewcestl_e "( upon i1'ne , ingJ_anci.<br />
A.0._{.c. L965.<br />
Cfficial i-ethods of Analrvsis (f Otn e¿. )<br />
George Ðanta Publishing öo. Ì,_enasha, ',i:is.<br />
¡-.Ò.A.C. t97L.<br />
Cfficial ¡'..ethods of Anali'sis (llth ed. )<br />
Ceorge Eanta Publishing Co. j,.enasha , iiis.<br />
Èaker, -!.H., D.I. Eecker, iÌ.ii;. Norton, A.ä. .lensen encl E.C. äe:.non.<br />
I oÁo<br />
_L,vsine imbalance of _ corn protein in growing pig.<br />
"t.<br />
Anir,r. Sci. 28 : 23 .<br />
Eehm, 1. l-954.<br />
ilber den linfluss der Ã.ohfoser in<br />
des Darnverlust- Stickstoffs nach<br />
Kaninchen und Schweinen.<br />
Arch. Tierernahrung t+: Lg7.<br />
EeIl ,<br />
P. H. 195l+.<br />
( Cit ed b¡' i(akada , l:. L . 197 t.) .<br />
,çlutt er auf die ì-ense<br />
Versuchen an.r"attanl<br />
ÐeIl , T.Ì1. L95L.<br />
l;utrient reouirernents<br />
q for Canadian Torkshire swine. li.<br />
stuCy of tlhe li'sine, tr¡.ptophen, :,iÈofla.,:in anã-penioihenic<br />
acr_c. recu.:.:'enents ot' pÍgs-v:eighing jC to I0C pounCè.<br />
Can. i.'-{nj.:. Sci. 4lri -106. "
E; arnason, ¿-. anci ä. "r . Carpenter. l97O .<br />
ilechanisn of heat danaþe in pi.oteins.<br />
changes Ln pure prct:iñs. -<br />
Erit . J. llu'ur . 24 | 313 .<br />
206<br />
Eorgströn, 8., -{. Dahlqvíst, G. Lundh and ,-I . Sjövall . L957,<br />
Studies of intestiñal dígestion and absorpiio;-i; tná-nunan.<br />
.j. Clin. Invest. 3ó: L5aI.<br />
Eorgström, 8., A. Dahlovist, E.E. Gustafsson, G. Lundh and<br />
.i. Ìtalno-uist. 1959.<br />
ïr¡rpsín, inverta se and an¡rlase content of feces of<br />
éç;¿:r¿¡i:Ë<br />
¡clUÞ.<br />
Proc. Soc. Exp. Êiol. l.led. I02: I5L+,<br />
Eorr'land , J. P. L962.<br />
AdCition of l','sine and or a tranouili øer Lo 1or^r protein,<br />
so¡rbean neal êupplementeã "rii;;;-¡;;-ã;";i"Ë"b"ã;;";is".<br />
J. .{ni:. Sci. 2I: 852.<br />
Ê-^ j,re€:ê, -^<br />
:-! Þ J.-tj., J.-1 . Uul',_Ð.I. Greene., ?.'j.. i.'alCroup and<br />
E.L. Stephenson. 1966.<br />
Conpariscn of anino acids 1¡ nilo and co:,n.<br />
Poultry Sci. 45t LO72 (¡-bstr. )<br />
ErauCe, _R..,. K.G. l-ítchetl, -r-.lf . I_¡,'res, ll."r. i,íe'r¡port and<br />
^¿-. Cuth.bertson. 1972.<br />
?he replacen:elt of protein concentrates b;, s¡rnthetic 1¡,sine<br />
in the diet of ¡5rowing pigs.<br />
Erit. ,_'. Nutr. ã7: Lóg'. -<br />
Ërovin, .:i.!. , i-.L. Levine end ì:. Lipkin. 1963.<br />
(Cited 'c:¡ 9euconneau, C. and l-,C. j.ichel. l9?O).<br />
Euraczev¡ski, S., i.l.i.G. Porter, E.A. i.ol1s and î. Zebrov.,ska.<br />
I Otl<br />
¿' I L.<br />
The course of digesticn of different food pr"oteins in the<br />
rât. 2. The effect -of feeding carboh:'drat,e r¡ith p::ote in.<br />
Erit. "T. llutr. 25 z 299 .<br />
CaIhoun, "".-.i_. ,- F_.ìi. iÌepburn anC li.E. Eradle¡r. 1960.<br />
ihe availabilit¡r oi I¡rsine in v¡heat, flou:., Éread and<br />
ðl ù+ âh<br />
J. liutr. 70: 337.<br />
Cerlson, ii.ll. and Ii.S. Eavle.¡. I9ZC.<br />
iÌi.trcgel and arnino acids- in feces of 1¡cung piss receÍrring<br />
a prot:in-free diet anC Ciets containing lråaãa Ler,¿ls ci<br />
so¡,'bean oí1 i;lea1 or casein.<br />
.I . i.iutr. 1C0: t353 .
,1È¡¡c, I¡ lOÁ,<br />
iff ect of carboh,','drat e s on ut ilizât ion of protein<br />
erd 1j- s inê b;. rats.<br />
.T 'trr+- nÒ. .1<br />
Chang, S.f. and H.L. Fuller. Ig6L.<br />
fffect of tannin content of grain sorghuns on theij.<br />
feeCing value for growing chicks.<br />
Poult:'1' Sci. 43: 3C.<br />
Cho,_C.Y., F.D. IÌorney and l.S. Ea;rfsy. L97L.<br />
Exenination of the ârnino ecids in' ileal Ci_gesta anC<br />
Íeces of carnulated pies.<br />
FeC. Proc. lC: 2-r5 1¡.Èstr. ).<br />
0on59r_ r., ;. ^a Penot, H. Charlier and f,. Saccuet . !9/.i.<br />
ì -Stabolisne du iat rrgem-freert.<br />
-r.nn. Eiol . Anirnale, Ðiochin. Eiophi-s. j: 163.<br />
Cranpton, X.i,'. and l.i. ilarris . 1969.<br />
.l-pp1i-eC .r,ni¡:al llutrit,Íon. (2nd Ei. )<br />
r,. .lJ. F¡eenan and Co. , San francisco.<br />
206A<br />
Ðanners , j. L96l+ .<br />
. Yerteringsstudi es blz het varken. Faktoren van j-nvloecÌ<br />
op cie ';ertering der -¡ceder ccaponenten en Ce ve rt 3 erbaa:"he i.d<br />
der aninozu:'en.<br />
iÌ.i. ÐrukkerÍj ttl:est-Frieslandtr, liorn.<br />
de l.¡elenaere, I-i. j.Ii., I.-.L. Chen and i..E. Flarper.<br />
Assessnent o.i factors influenci-ng estinatLon<br />
availebilitj¡ in cereel proiuct s.<br />
j. Agric. Food them. 15: lIS.<br />
of I..sine<br />
lr:per, S.ì. 7973 ,<br />
Anino aci.d.proÍi1es of chenical and anatonícal fractions<br />
o; oet gre1ns.<br />
..T. Sci. Food Âgric . 2d : l-àlrt.<br />
Ðurafd, G., Q. Fauconneau and i. Pénot. 1966.<br />
Grol¡Lh of tissues in the rat and cuelity of protein in<br />
the Ciet; influsnce on nunber anC size ôf ceils.<br />
Ann. Biol. -{nÍnale, Biochin:. Eiophys. 6:. 389.<br />
Easter, R..À.. I972.<br />
Ln i::lpi.orred -r-echnicue<br />
¡- for ciete¡-r:tining anino acid ar¡ai.labiLi.t::<br />
rr¡ -¡ Pr¿ -- Þ .<br />
i-. Sc. lhesis, Texas A â, ì- Llniversitl', :exas.
247<br />
aster, R.-4-. and T. D. îanksley, Jr. 1973,<br />
A technicu-e for re-entrant ileocecal c¡.nnulation oí srr'ine.<br />
"'. -¡-nin. Sci. 35: 1099.<br />
Eastwood, l.I. A. 1973 .<br />
Vegeiable fibre: its ph¡'s1¿¿I properti.es.<br />
Proc . l'lutr. Soc . J 2: 137 .<br />
Eggur,r, E.3. 1958.<br />
-Á.iri.no syrekoncentration og Prot e in-kvalíte t .<br />
Stougaards Forlag, Copenhagen.<br />
rggun, Ð.C. 1969.<br />
Paper (in Danish) fron the fourth Scandinavian grein<br />
ouality c.onference, ^'.rik.i.i, - lielsinki, FinIanC _(a .contrit-uiion<br />
lron landöiiononish forsõg slab ora t o:.iun, iìoli¿heisve; 25,<br />
Copenhagen).<br />
ngg'.un,8.3. I97I.<br />
Conpari-tive protein evaluation l.¡ith r ets anci ba'ci'<br />
<strong>fn</strong>ternational Si'nposiun: tr-Â.rnino -a-ciis ia llninal<br />
l¿^1,.-^ I'eaD<br />
iggun, E.C. 1973.<br />
l- study of certain factors influencing protein utilization<br />
in rats and pígs.<br />
Eeretn. Fors/gslab. LA6.<br />
Eggun:, E.C. and K.D. Christensen. I975.<br />
Influence of tannin on protej.n utÍlization in feeistuffs<br />
rvith special reference to barlev.<br />
In rrEreeding for seed protej.n improvanent using nucl:ar<br />
+ a ¡È¡ i ^rra a l?<br />
International Âtonic Xne.rgy Agency, Yienna.<br />
irbersdobler, T. and G. Riedel. 1970.<br />
.(Cited 'cy Salter, D.lJ., Ï:.f . Coates and D. ilewitt , 197t+.)<br />
::',,-^-r '] D D r'^.rf 'J ;1-eêòh tr nLarlier a.nd j. I saccuet.<br />
J. r .¿ . r-vE:{., ¡1. .i-\ ù-v¡I , i.. ç¡i.<br />
\961'. '<br />
Faecal Iipids in gerni-free end conventional rats.<br />
Erit. J. ixp. Pethol . 45: t+09.<br />
ìu,iart, "r..À-.Ð. Lg67.<br />
Anino acid analirses of glutenins and gliadins,<br />
.1 . Sci. Food ^4gr. 18: L1I.<br />
äusb andryrt .<br />
Farrell, D.J. and K,A. .rohnscn. L972.<br />
LItillzation of cellulose by pigs and its effect on caecel<br />
function.<br />
.Á.nin. P:'od . 1l¿: 2A9 .
Fauconneau, G. and lI.C. IIichel . 1970.<br />
The role of gastrointestinal tract in the Ì"egulat j-on of<br />
protein netabolisn:r. <strong>fn</strong> ttllar:rneLien Protein lletabolisnrt.<br />
1¡o1 . fV. (H.II. l-unro, ed. ) Acaderiric Press. l.iew York.<br />
Filipot , P. , R. ,-r. Eelzile and c. i. Erisson. 19?1.<br />
Availability of the anino acids in caseip, fish neal ,<br />
soya protein and zein as ¡ieasured ín the chicken.<br />
Can. J. Aninr. Sci.51 : 801 .<br />
Folkes, E.F. and f.r.d. Yenrr. '1956,<br />
The anrino ecid content of proteins of berlei¡ Erains.<br />
Eiochero. ¿.6Z: l+.<br />
Ga1lo , "-. T. and 'r.:. G . Fond . I96e ,<br />
Anilo acid suppl ernenta t ion to a1l-corn di-ets for piEs.<br />
,-T. Anirn. Sci . ZT : 73 .<br />
208<br />
Gal-lo, i.T., trtl.G. Pond anC J.W. Logon:arsino. L96e,<br />
Response _of earll'-treaned pigs to anino acid supplerßentet ion<br />
oI corn daets.<br />
J. Âninr. Scí. 27: 1000,<br />
Giovannetti, P.Ìi., S.C. Stothers end F,.J. Parker. L97A.<br />
Coprophagy prevention and availabilit.rr 6¡ anino aciCs in<br />
wheat fcr the grc',{ing ret.<br />
Cen. .I. .{nin. Sei. 50: 269 .<br />
Cordon, T.A. and E.S. l,'ostnenn. 1960.<br />
llorphological stuCies on the gerrnfre e elbino rat.<br />
Anaa. Re¿ . L37: 65,<br />
Gordon, Y..4. and E. Êruckne r-Kardo s s . f96f.<br />
nffect of norr¿al microbial flora on intestinal surface area.<br />
Amer. J. Physisl . 2C1 : 175.<br />
Gupta, J.D., 4.tl. Ðakrourl,, A.E. Herper and C.4.. !h.ehje¡:.<br />
't o
C. P:ers ^h^<br />
in rqhe at<br />
oo?<br />
lt<br />
:1<br />
!ît-<br />
^<br />
eL^,,<br />
u-n1a L1-^<br />
^'¡q:êi ^ ..:s<br />
'.'cl lii.<br />
i ¡ ¡,li'¡c 1'¿-<br />
-Éì<br />
r---^<br />
ôri ñ^ ^ ^.1 -:<br />
10q?<br />
: I : Llron: L¿-er.<br />
rni : ¡ _^.¡-^-,<br />
?c9<br />
i ri:s- i r-: ..ri .t-i- ni -.<br />
4l- ô^--ri ^* ¡*<br />
CUJV.L P L TU:I -L¡I<br />
:nd c ertâin<br />
oi<br />
hôl -+^; !^
iìugli, i.I. and S. Ì_oore. L972.<br />
Deterninê.tion of the tr¡rptophan cont"n-e of protei-ns<br />
b-y lgn- exchange -chromatôiraþh¡, oí alkaline liã"ãi.;ã.-_us.<br />
"'. Eiol . Chen. 2t+7 : ZtZÈ ,<br />
ïr1',_.C..tr., !-.8. Eragg and I.L. Stephenson. I97l .<br />
The avaílabiIit-v- of ar:ino acidè fron: so.r,báan neal for<br />
the rror¡ring chiäk.<br />
Poultry Sci. 5C: l*08.<br />
johnson, V.A. and C.L. La1'. L97U.<br />
Genetic inprovement oi plant protein.<br />
"'. !.9r. Food Che¡n. 22: - 558.. -<br />
Jones, Q.E.,.4. Caldr¡;ell anC ä.Ð. l;iidness. I94S.<br />
Conpareti.ve grov;th pronoting values of próteins of<br />
cereal grains.<br />
J. trÌutr. 35: 6lg.<br />
Ju, J.S. and E.S. N¡sset. 1959.<br />
Changes in total ni'r,rogen content of sone abioninal<br />
viscera in fasting anci reaLinentation.<br />
,.1. ìriuir. 68: 633,<br />
r¡^t-^J^<br />
-rd¡\dLld<br />
r1 r<br />
, 1,i...!. f, I +.<br />
Eiochenical basis for the differences in p1ent, protein<br />
utilization.<br />
J . -¿.gr . Food Che;r. 22 :<br />
- -<br />
2ro<br />
Kihlberg, R. and L.il . iricson. L96L.<br />
.{n:ino acid conposition of 11,¿ flour and . the influence cf<br />
anrino acid ^gupplementation of :.1,e flour anci L,read on gro.,rth,<br />
nítrogen efficíenc¡r ratio ¿nd liver fat in the gro"in!-,.t.<br />
"I. Ilutr. S2: 385 .<br />
Y4øaaih Ð ¡ a r o^..--J---- ---,!<br />
r!..r_¿ Þuri, 11 .:. , ù. ! . saunders anci .Í. F. E.rock. 1gó9.<br />
Anino acid transport in experimental proteín_òalorie<br />
malnutrition.<br />
-{mer . .I . Clin. Nutr . 2L : l3OZ .<br />
l{uiken, i( . A . and C . i.i. Lynran. Lg4e .<br />
Availability of anino acids in sone foods.<br />
i. ilutr. 35: 359.<br />
Íuiken, ä.-Â.. 1952.<br />
Availability of- the essentiel anino ¿cids in cottonseec near.<br />
J . Nutr. /+ô : L3 .
zTL<br />
;êpor'"e, T. and J. îrer:o1íères. L9Q.<br />
lnhibiting action of rice, oat, c,ej-ze , barle Lr, r¡,,e ancl<br />
buckwheat neals on sone proteoÍr'tic eázynes ôf tLe pãtr.r"r".<br />
C.i.. Soc. EioI. 156: IZ6L.<br />
Larson, i{.L. and E.c. I-ìí11. I96C.<br />
Anine îornation anci retabolic activity of nicroorganisms in<br />
the-iIeu¡l_of youls swine fed chlorte-,,¡acj¡c1ine. -"<br />
";. Êacteríol . 80: I88.<br />
Levenson, S.:r-. and Ë. îennant . 1953.<br />
Contr.ibutions of intestinal nic¡'oflora to the nutrition<br />
of the host anirnal . sone netaboric and nutritionai siucies<br />
with gern-free aninals.<br />
Fed. Proc. 22: f09.<br />
Linds-tedt, -G., S. LinCstedt and E.E. Gustefsson. Lg65.<br />
i-ucus in intestinal contents of ger.rfre e rets.<br />
J. ;,:rp. l.ed. 12Ì : zCL.<br />
L1oyd., L.f ., Ð.G. Dale and E.i,'. Cranpton. r9it.<br />
îhe rol-e of the cecun in nutrieni utilizáiion 'cy the piê.<br />
"t. Anim. Sci. 17: 6e4.<br />
Loesche, i,'.;. L96t.<br />
Á.c cul::ul at ion cf endogenous proiein in the cecun o.f the<br />
gern-free rat.<br />
Proc. Soc. ixp. Eio1. i.eC. I28: L9j.<br />
Luckei.', l. D. 1953 .<br />
<strong>fn</strong> llGernfree life- anci gnotobÍologyrr. (Ì.Ð. L,-rcke;.-, ei . )<br />
Acadenic .Press. ìier,¡ ïoik .<br />
I.acGregor, R.:1.. L976. (-,-npublisheC)<br />
l.acrae, J.C. I975.<br />
ihe use òf re-entrant cannulàe to partition Cigestir,-e<br />
function l.¡ithin the gestro- int e stiira 1 t!.act of runinãnts.<br />
ïn rrÐigestion and Ì,-etabolisr: in the Runinant¡l<br />
(Ì-cDoneld, f .r.'i. and A.C.I. ;,:arner, eds. ) The 'jniversitl<br />
of }.ler^¡ lngland Fublishing i_lnit. /,r:r.ì Cale , l-ustralia . "<br />
ì.ason, V.C. end G. llÍlne. I,a7!.<br />
The digestion of bacteÍ'íaI nucopepti_d.e consii-uuents in<br />
the sheep. 2. ihe digestion oï äurar":ic aciC.<br />
,.r. AÊ;ric . Sci. , Camb. 77 : 99 .<br />
ì,ason, T.C. and i,. Falner. L973.<br />
The influence of bacterial activiti,, in the alinentar:¡ canal<br />
of rats on faecal nitrogen excretiän.<br />
Acta Agric. Scand. 2l: 14L.
ì-cLaugh1an, "'.;:., S. Yenkat Êao, i..r. iioal anC<br />
-¡..8. i_orriscn. 1967.<br />
Elood ani no acid studles. yI . Lrse of plasna ani-no ecid<br />
sco¡'e Íor predicting liniting anino aciä (s) ln ¿leta¡"<br />
¡¡¿r*a¡qe<br />
Can. "I . Eiochen. 45: 3L.<br />
212<br />
I'icLaughlan, .T.l-. L,o72.<br />
iíutritional evaluetion of proteins bi' biological nethoCs,<br />
Cereal ScÍence ToCay 17: -162.<br />
l,'a¡'or' -I lJ IO
i-unck, L. I96t+.<br />
-'^^''^..3<br />
-ire !,ar'.rëLaon of nutritÍcnal value in barle¡,. -L-. ïariet¡r<br />
ând nitrcgerl fertirizer effects on che¡:icai" òonpåsition an
ã".irç, Pâ!.Î,lê ri ¡i.iJ., T rî u-.ì,. F a^-L^ jonrbs, Ð : -¿: R:R. Kifer ¡^- and -- p,G. Sn¡rcìe:". 196g.<br />
ïnvestigation of prótein o.uality: ileal recorr"r;'. ãi -<br />
anino acids.<br />
Fed. Proc.27: 1199.<br />
PhilJ-ipson, l_.T. 19jZ.<br />
(Cited br'ì-acÌìae, "'.C. L?75.)<br />
Pond, _ï,'.G., J.H. ilaner and F.A. Linares. l-97J-<br />
. Liniting -arnino acids ìn Colunbían fl.ourj._Z corn for<br />
groïrth oî :.¡ot-rng rats.<br />
J. -Anirrr. Sci. 332 787.<br />
Yoppe , 5. and ii. t.eier. I97L.<br />
.YergleichenCe betrachtunEen d=r eninosaüren rescrption<br />
bei'¡erschiedene tierartãn.<br />
.Á.rch. líe:.ernährung ZL: |3l-.<br />
Сef¡t I' lô(t<br />
J.7 ) I .<br />
Ðer einfluss genetischer unC ökologischer faktor:n auf<br />
den eiwesshauëhalt, \'on sonnerg."-iån. a"",-op se n unter<br />
besoncei.er ber'ück si cht igu.ng dãr exogeneä ã¡r:.noåäuren.<br />
Zuchter. 26: Zl.'L,<br />
Pulse, _R.I., J.P. Ëaker anci G.Ð. potier. 1973.<br />
Iffects of cecal fistulation upon nutr"ián-t digest,ion and<br />
indicator :'etenii on in ho:'ses.'<br />
J. 4.nin. Sci. 37 : 488.<br />
iìobbins, G. S. , ï. Pomeranz anci Ì.i.'. !r ir--l . . I o':l<br />
.Aniáo aciá conposition ãi oãt À"ããiËl-"' L't!'<br />
J. Lgr'1c. Food Chen. 19: 536.<br />
R.osenberg, :i.P-., A. Culik and R.l. fckerj.. Io5c<br />
!:'siñá arcÌ ihreonitt" =ulprä.ru"tãiïà-"å¡ ríóá,<br />
J. Ì\iutr. 69; ZL?,<br />
P.ose-nberg,_ H.ì,. , I.L. Rohdenburg and F..E. fcliert. I9óOa.<br />
l-,ult-iple enino acid supplen:ãntation of r.¡hite cori ¡reã1 ,<br />
J. llutr. 72: 415.<br />
2LI+<br />
Roselberg, !1.R., ¡.L. F,.ohCenburg end R.E. ickert. l96Ob.<br />
Supplenentation of bread prõtein r,,;i th l;,rsine anci'thr.ãonine .<br />
J. llutr. 72: l+23.<br />
Salter, l.ll. ani li.:. Coates. I9?A,<br />
Proc . <strong>fn</strong>t. . Congr. llutr. r,rÌIt-. pracue .
Salter, D.11 . and 1.,i.ì. Coates. L97L.<br />
The influence of the nicroflora of ti,e alinentarlr tract<br />
on protein digesticn in the chick.<br />
Brit . .j . llutr. 26: 5i .<br />
Salter, D.l:l and R,"'. Ful_ford. l97L+,<br />
The influence of the gut n:icroflora on the digestion of<br />
dietary and endogenous proteins: studies of fha a¡:ino<br />
acid composition of the excrete of gern-free anC<br />
conr,'entÍonel aninals.<br />
Erit. J. ltutr. 32l. 62 j .<br />
Salter, D.ll., l:.r. Coates anC Ð. I{evritt. . L9TL.<br />
- The utiliza.tion of protein and excretion of u:"ic aclC<br />
gern-free<br />
in<br />
and conventicnal chicks.<br />
Erit. .i. iiutr. 11: 307.<br />
2L5<br />
Sauer, l.r.C. 1972.<br />
A't ailabilit:' of_ enino acids fron bar-l e:¡, wheat , trj.tical_e<br />
and so.'bean neal for gror,ling swine.<br />
ll. Sc. Thesis, Lrniversiti' of llanitoba, 1,,'i¡¡i. çg.<br />
Sauer, r,l.C,, P.j:, Ciovannetti ånC S.C. Siothe:'s . I97t+,<br />
.¡-vailabilit;' of_ anino acids fron ba:"1e,,, .l^,'h e at ,<br />
and so-r'be an neel for growing pígs.<br />
Can. .I. Anir:. Sci. 5L: 97-Ijj.<br />
' trit icale<br />
Saunders, il..l:. , :j.C. t'lalker. .Tr.. anC G.O. j{ohler. . 1969.<br />
Al-euron¡ ce1ls qnC the digesti bitit-r, of r.¡heat niil_' f e:Cs .<br />
Poultrw Sci. L8: !t+97 .<br />
Saunders, F".l.l. and G,O, Kohler. L9?2.<br />
<strong>fn</strong> '¡itro Ceternination of pi-otein Cigestibiliti' in rrrheat<br />
:ni11f:eds f or. nonogastric äni¡e1s.<br />
Cêreal Chen. l+9: -98.<br />
qL^+l^- t\Î rf<br />
^ ñ<br />
--n:rrar, r:.ir.., ,J. -. -F"ankin, .j.F. ll¡nen ¿nd I,j.G. g:"ance . L9L?.<br />
Ìnvestigation of the pioïi::let e' cheni cal cor:position of the<br />
seperate bran layers of wheet.<br />
Cereel Chen. 2l+: Itl .<br />
Shimada, .¡1. anC T. R . Cline . L97 L.<br />
linitin.-z ai.ino acids of triiicele for ihe growin€ ret<br />
c . j,n:Ii. bci. Ji: 94t.<br />
Sl:de, L.Ì:., i. Eishcp, J.G. ì_orrÍs a¡..1 1..;. ìoLinson. 19?1,<br />
Jl-gestion ar:.d . a'osorption of 15 i:-labeiIcd .-.:icrot -; á1 prot e in<br />
in 'uire large intestine oí t,he ho:'se.<br />
F.r : * Ì¡¡r .: 1aJ . -,.1
' 2l-6<br />
Snook, J.T. 1965,<br />
Jffect of iiet on inteslinal proteoJ_7sis.<br />
Fed. Proc. 24: 9tI.<br />
Snook, J.T. anci J.ii. l:le-ver. t964a.<br />
'i.esponse of digestive enzyme s to dietar¡,. proieins.<br />
,-. itrut,r. Ë2 : 409:<br />
Sncok, .T.T..and J.H. Ì-er¡er. L964b.<br />
Effect oí diet and digestive processes on proteoli.,tì-c<br />
.:.<br />
J. ilutr . 83 : 9l+ .<br />
Soare.sr'J.il., .ir. and R.R. Kife:.. I97L<br />
Evaluetions of protein c-uality based on resicual an:ino<br />
acids of 'r,he ileal contents of chicks.<br />
Poul--,,rj/ Sci. 5A: 41 .<br />
Sod.ek, L. and û.I\i. llIilson. f971.<br />
Ar:ino ací
l,liting, F. and L.li. Eezeau. 1957a.<br />
ihe ¡retabolic fecaL nitrogen excretion of the piE es<br />
influenced by the anount õf flbre in rhe ratioh änd<br />
by bodyweight.<br />
Can. .1. Anirn. Sci . 37: 9j.<br />
'rJhiting, F. and L.l.l. Eezeau, 1957È.<br />
The ¡retabolic fecal nitro_gen excretion of the pig as<br />
infLuenced by the type of-fibre in the ration ãnã t,y<br />
oooyl'Je]-gnt.<br />
Can. J. Anim. Sci. 37: lC6.<br />
I',rillia¡rs, C.H., D..'. Ðavid ancì C. Lisnaa. L962.<br />
The determination of chror:ic oxide in feóes sanples by<br />
ato¡ric absorption spe ctropliot oaetry.<br />
;. -A-gric . sci . 5g:' 3g.I ."<br />
i,¡rsocki , L. A. and .I. P. Eaker. Ig7Z.<br />
Eacterial _protein digestion in the e c-ui-ne lower gut.<br />
.'. ¡t-nin. Sci. 35: 225 (t¡str. )<br />
Zebronska, T. L97je.<br />
Influence oí dietary protein source<br />
digestion in the sanll intestine of<br />
end conposition of digesta.<br />
Rocz . ltlauk R.ol . Ë-95-I , Ll5 .<br />
on the rate of<br />
pigs. ï. Anount<br />
Zebror,;ska, 1. I973b.<br />
<strong>fn</strong>fluence of dietary protein source on the rate cf<br />
Cigestion in the san1l intestine of piss. II. The<br />
rate of protein d_igestion ani enino ãclC absorption.<br />
Rocz. llauk RoL. E-95-I , 136.<br />
2L7
APPENDIÏ TABLE 1, Analysís,of variance between treatments for study 1: Mean<br />
squares for apparent amino acld avaiLabilities aird apparent<br />
nitrogen and dry matter digestibil.Íties.<br />
Source of Variatlon<br />
Degrees of Freedon<br />
AMTNO ACTDS<br />
Ess_entiel<br />
ARG<br />
HTS<br />
ÏI,E<br />
Î,EU<br />
IYS<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Ess ential<br />
_r-LÃ_-<br />
ÂSP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NTTROGEN<br />
DRY I.T,AITER<br />
x (p(0.05)<br />
xx (P
APPENDIX TABL,E 2. Analysis of<br />
squares for<br />
Source of Variation<br />
Degrees of Freedom<br />
AMTNO ACIDS<br />
Essential<br />
HIS<br />
ILE<br />
LEU<br />
tYs<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential-<br />
--rffiF----<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
GLT<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
NTTNOGEN<br />
( P
¡lPPlllDrx r¡nll 3. Thc Índlviduêl apperent ileal and faecal amino Ecid av¿irabilities<br />
fron co¡n_in_studl' 2Ð, jn êdditlon to nitrogen and dr.,,, maiter<br />
dígestibilÍties and a1'.rege dêi.11, dry rnattei intake. '<br />
P]NTOD<br />
PIG llt:?:ìti<br />
LOCATION<br />
ArrNc ^crDs (i;)<br />
Ussential<br />
-ÃTmllIS<br />
TLiJ<br />
LXU<br />
t,rf 3.<br />
t:tTr<br />
PIIE<br />
TM<br />
V,{L<br />
l.lon- jis sential<br />
GLU<br />
PRO<br />
TTR<br />
t:tTR0ctit,l<br />
DRÏ ÌITTUR?<br />
DNY T,ATTËR,<br />
Dnl:,'.tÂT1 ER<br />
INTAJíE<br />
t9.8<br />
ti9.1<br />
89.4<br />
9+.O<br />
o).L<br />
92.2<br />
8r.1<br />
90.?<br />
85.8<br />
84.9<br />
9),2<br />
73.3<br />
12.?<br />
llo.J<br />
91, O<br />
B0.l<br />
81.8<br />
l.765<br />
)<br />
T,¡\ECDS<br />
9t.1<br />
93 .2<br />
e,7 . (,<br />
93 ,5<br />
68.i,<br />
90'¿l<br />
8 j.3<br />
87 .)<br />
89 ,6<br />
È,o. tr<br />
do 1<br />
93 .4<br />
9) .r<br />
90.2<br />
89,¿l<br />
BB.3<br />
89,3<br />
ILi'U¡':. FÂICDs TLNIÛ!<br />
88.2 92.5<br />
89.7 92.6<br />
87.) 86.6<br />
92.4 93.1<br />
d't a !,r t<br />
92.2 8S. r+<br />
9c.3 90.7<br />
80.o 85,t+<br />
tì4.4 S7.1<br />
89.2 90,7<br />
8t+.7 86.t0<br />
84.9 89,3<br />
92.) 9t+.5<br />
89.6 92.3<br />
E5 .9 9r.2<br />
8 9.1 89 .6<br />
e) .9 8t .5<br />
8l.l 0¿.9<br />
L765<br />
TT<br />
FÂECIS ILTU;i IA¡C¿S<br />
89.6 %.2 89.6<br />
89 ] 95.o 88.9<br />
94.2 90. t 88.6<br />
91,.4 95.1 93.1<br />
8[.0 e j.6 8z.z<br />
91 ,4 92.2 91.!,<br />
9),4 92.9 91.5<br />
82.5 88. 5 80.1<br />
88.1 89 ,5 86,3<br />
91.1 92.6 89. t,<br />
86 .9 87 .r 8t+.7<br />
76.11 9r.8 78. ¿r<br />
gb.o 95.O 92.t+<br />
77 .2 87 .8 69 .2<br />
È4. L, 9L.2 75,6<br />
87.4 92.3 85,6<br />
9r.7 9r.6 89.8<br />
8t+.2<br />
80.7<br />
S2. ¿!<br />
1900<br />
ol , dâ .<br />
90.3 79.8<br />
81./t<br />
1900<br />
[or thq determination of lllìT and CYS êveilabilities, faeces from the z<br />
sanê diet during each pêrticular t.est pcriod, were iooled.<br />
Dry matter digestibilíties in this ror,¡ v¡ere based on the chronic oxide r¡ethod,<br />
Dry matter digest.ibilities in this row uere l¡ased on total collection,<br />
93.3<br />
96 .r<br />
94.2<br />
9¿1.6<br />
86.5<br />
92.8<br />
90.0<br />
92.)<br />
91.8<br />
95 ,r<br />
92.3<br />
9r .5<br />
91.8<br />
90,1<br />
pigs, fed the<br />
85.9<br />
87 .6<br />
86.4<br />
91.8<br />
92.O<br />
89 'z<br />
?7.o<br />
83 ,9<br />
FtIc¡ls<br />
9L.6<br />
92.6<br />
86.8<br />
93 .5<br />
80,6<br />
87.9<br />
94.7<br />
85.4<br />
87 .5<br />
88.1 90.1<br />
82.6 85.5<br />
83 .1 89.6<br />
2\.2 22-?<br />
I z. I ë).t+<br />
8t+.3 9¡,, o<br />
8l ,B 9o.7<br />
88.1 89.?<br />
82. I 88 .,t<br />
60.0 .89,6<br />
79.?<br />
1900<br />
ILDUi'; ¡"{DCUS<br />
6r. j<br />
85 .0<br />
8.1.0<br />
88.8<br />
92,o<br />
86 .9<br />
72.1+<br />
79.3<br />
82.8<br />
78.6<br />
83 .1<br />
87 .9<br />
6r,t<br />
69 .3<br />
80.1<br />
.81r.2<br />
77,r<br />
1900<br />
B7 .l+<br />
92.3<br />
81.9<br />
87 ,9<br />
90 ,)<br />
84. ¿<br />
87 ,6<br />
89 .5<br />
86.0<br />
¿9.6<br />
d5.ó<br />
9r .l+<br />
89.3<br />
88.2
^PP¡NDIX î^nLX l+, The individuel aFpêrent ileal and faecaf enino âcid avâilabitities<br />
fron barÌe:¡ in study 2a, in eddition to nit¡ogen and dry matter<br />
digestibilities and average dail"\' drl. matter intake,<br />
IL]]<br />
LDU<br />
T,Y5,<br />
T-ETT<br />
TI]È<br />
1'¡.L<br />
llon-Essential<br />
¡LÂ<br />
cïsI^3F- Pn0<br />
1LR<br />
¡\:rTRoctì¡t ^<br />
DtìY t;^,. T:tÍ<br />
läY I-,'li"i':ÌtJ<br />
Dnï L^TTritì. I<br />
7,4.4<br />
78,8<br />
7 8.6<br />
7.L.2<br />
80.7<br />
80.1<br />
66,6<br />
68.2<br />
8L .5<br />
¿5.5<br />
72. tr<br />
?7.rt<br />
7l+.6<br />
62,6<br />
65.O<br />
766<br />
87,5 e3.9<br />
9r.7 8r.9<br />
¿r,8 81.0<br />
85.6 83 .0<br />
76.7 73 ,6<br />
80.0 80.7<br />
87.3 83,7<br />
1ô A 1) â<br />
tll 1 ?o 2<br />
/o. / /t.t<br />
7 5.3 7L.9<br />
Ë8.6 Ê1.5<br />
92.3 I8.0<br />
81,8<br />
(,t¡.6<br />
2?.9 91.7<br />
ë).) /tt.t<br />
8t,.3 60.,<br />
r). / / /.é<br />
82.7 7a.4<br />
''lo<br />
1 1t',/,<br />
Il;T¡li[ (¡'./da], )<br />
I' ?-' 3 \he sar¡e as in ^pFendi-.., Table 3<br />
90.7<br />
83.r<br />
8?.o<br />
80.0<br />
87 .9<br />
8tr'9<br />
77.O<br />
78. 9<br />
8¿t.6<br />
91.1<br />
8lr . t'.<br />
83 .7<br />
8l .1<br />
85.6<br />
8a.5<br />
76.6<br />
75.4<br />
75.6<br />
88.9<br />
74.O<br />
83.9<br />
81.1<br />
fll+.2<br />
7t.3<br />
190 2<br />
92.)<br />
8l .r<br />
87.0<br />
78.5<br />
¿e.2<br />
6t!.J<br />
78.o<br />
89.0<br />
82.7<br />
93 .L<br />
87 .5<br />
85 .0<br />
86.0<br />
83 .9<br />
80.?<br />
27.8 Qq.t, 88.0<br />
. 1r.6 9o.t 79.r n.5<br />
' 3z.o 9o.z za.o qz.i<br />
?5.7 el.4 7?.o 8l+.,, So.O Cr,. ¡<br />
79.4 B5.r , 80.8 e7.o 81.5 ed.o<br />
ç9-.1 Z\.9 73.e 77 .e T.7 7).6<br />
qo.3 90.¡ 79.5 co.o 8r.l 4ô.0 ðí:3<br />
t'6.9 82.6 88.5 sz.ó l.s.'6<br />
óq.6 79.7 ?0.6 gz.L zt,z ir.á<br />
76.) 82.8 77.3 e4.9 7?.5 !,5.4,<br />
65.5 75.)<br />
67 ,s 76.6<br />
77 .3 e9. 0<br />
77.3 78.6<br />
7) .r i8.?<br />
7 4.t 8ô ,6<br />
6o.L. 'ìq.o<br />
îo.i ii.6<br />
? L.i 8¡1. ó<br />
85.t* J3.r!.<br />
e4.g 2r.7<br />
57,t+ 81.4<br />
t7.7<br />
68,t* 61 '),O .4 673 rli,g<br />
7t+.9 91.0 81.1 92.7 Cz.q .)i.2<br />
72.3 c'5.5 7?.6 87.6 ?5.6 iil.o<br />
77 .6 83 .6 78.t+ 86. 6 rlo. 2 S6.1<br />
70.6 g/*.r ?5.7 86.1 7),r n?.5<br />
(,6 .r ü .9 62 .6 ¿j .6 ó1r.0 dt . ?<br />
ó4. .3 66 .t 65 ,6<br />
rgAz I9O2 1902<br />
ÀJ<br />
¡\)<br />
H
.]\PPÛNDIX TABLIJ 5. ]'he i ndividual êpPsrent íleal and feêcâl ar,rino êcid av¿j.låbilities;<br />
trom vr¡éai.'i" "ti,äy ãa, in addition to nitrofen and dr]¡ natter ì<br />
.ligestibilities end avcra¡le daill' dry rnatter intake.<br />
PIRTOD<br />
PTC NUtlP.lilì<br />
LOCÂTTON<br />
ACrDS (ii )<br />
Essential<br />
^i1TN0<br />
ARG<br />
lll s<br />
rLn<br />
Li]U<br />
LÏ5.<br />
r-:1r<br />
PIIË<br />
VAL<br />
tlon-Ðssential<br />
ALÂ<br />
AfìPcÏst<br />
tìt u<br />
cT,v<br />
PRO<br />
TYR<br />
t'r-tTnoc[,tr .<br />
ILiìUH TIDCES :tllull r^l1cEs ll,EÛ]: F^[cils ]Lllui, FÂ[crs<br />
87.6<br />
86.0<br />
87 .2<br />
75,6<br />
88. É<br />
77.2<br />
e') .3<br />
71+.5<br />
76.2<br />
?,2,6<br />
92.8<br />
Bl+.9<br />
84. B<br />
P,6.o<br />
83.7<br />
DRY m,l'r EÌá ? 4.I<br />
ÐtÌr t,^ TT Jn-', ?i.9<br />
DNY I A]'TIIJI I? 59<br />
II:l ¡,iir (r/dFr )<br />
o"o<br />
91+.6<br />
87.t*<br />
o)t<br />
8ó.r<br />
88.7<br />
e3 .7<br />
82 .9<br />
96 .7<br />
88,7<br />
95,5<br />
92,I<br />
89. r<br />
90.6<br />
l' 2' ) Tye same es ln AFfendix, ]¡b1c 3'<br />
84.0 9r.2 85.4 9t,2<br />
e6.9 gJ.r+ 89 3 93.8<br />
8l .9 89. r 91, .6 86.9<br />
Pr, .l 90. e 86.7 89.t,<br />
?o.t+ 7?,t¡ 76.1 78.2<br />
àt+ .7 87 . r+ 86 .1+ ¿7 ,9<br />
86.7 92.3 88.3 90.8<br />
7\.5 85 .5 76. .a 8t+.3<br />
?8.7 88.1. Bl.r 86.1<br />
6? .? 8).2 7\-.2 80.1<br />
6? .5 8r.o 76.3 80.1<br />
82.6 q3.2 t5.6 %.6<br />
9L.) 96.9 .a2.6 96.1'.<br />
62.2 89.0 ?6.3 e7.r<br />
86.6 96,9 83.6 96.)<br />
80.8 92.O 85.r 9l. o<br />
83.2 138.6 85.2 87 .t+<br />
77.8 rì9.9 t).8 90. t+<br />
70 .3 e9 ,2 7) .7 88 .6<br />
7759 tÛ9¿!<br />
II<br />
B6.l<br />
85.t+<br />
86.9<br />
t).t<br />
86.1<br />
8s.1<br />
?6.L<br />
82.6<br />
t? o<br />
?l+.8<br />
93 .o<br />
9a.6<br />
83 .)<br />
¿6.0<br />
Ð.6<br />
96.0<br />
90.5<br />
92.6<br />
82.tn<br />
87.9<br />
93,6<br />
88 .O<br />
90.3<br />
9tr,5<br />
93 .6<br />
97.t+<br />
90.3<br />
96 .9<br />
93.2<br />
90.L<br />
82.2 92.5<br />
?2.9 è9.2<br />
L89t+<br />
rl¡ruri Frl[cls ILtrJ]l I'Â llcns<br />
88.2<br />
89.2<br />
89 .4<br />
79.9<br />
88.8<br />
9l .6<br />
too<br />
â1:A<br />
79.5<br />
Ê1,r<br />
87 .5<br />
9l+.2<br />
8t .3<br />
75.o<br />
73.6<br />
l¿oL<br />
Ð.6<br />
95.3<br />
oì,<br />
92.8<br />
82.7<br />
9r.5<br />
94.O<br />
88,5<br />
90.5<br />
86 .5<br />
85.6<br />
9t+.4<br />
o?(<br />
90.6<br />
97 ,It<br />
9) .6<br />
9r.t,<br />
a), l<br />
86,2 Ð.r,<br />
9r.0 96.2<br />
85.7 89.9<br />
8C..9 9l.9<br />
76 .6 8r1.0<br />
88 .I 91.5<br />
89,0 9l .o<br />
?? .t+ 87 .8<br />
àj.5 89.5<br />
7 t+.O 85 .L<br />
76.6 rì4 .1<br />
87 .5 91+ .l)<br />
92. U 97.3<br />
dñt<br />
82.t* 97 .I<br />
d5n a)a<br />
16.tn 90.1<br />
B[.] 9r.5<br />
7?-.3
APPENDIJ( TÂBIE 6. Mean squâres of the analyses of variance for th€ aDparent<br />
ileal and faecal availabiLíties of the essential añino<br />
aclds for study 2a.<br />
ÂMINO ACIDS<br />
Source of ]rariatfoB<br />
Treatrnent (2)I<br />
Pertods (2)<br />
Pies (5)<br />
Location (l)<br />
Treatnents x<br />
LocåtÍon (2)<br />
Periods x Location (21<br />
Pigs x Location (5)<br />
Error (L6)<br />
1<br />
x<br />
to(<br />
ARG<br />
Hls<br />
58.79xx t35.olx')( 169.90x,\ zh7.o7Æ<br />
3.28 O,g2 2.3L 1.91<br />
6.80x g.g6x g.r+1 6.59<br />
382,20>Å '+76,6rs 75.L11
APPENDIX TABI,E 7, Mean squares for the analysls of varlance for the<br />
apparent lleal and faecaL avaiLabillti.es of the<br />
non-essential anino aclds, in addftion to nitrogen<br />
and dry natter dlgestlbtlttles for study 2a.<br />
AMINO ACIDS<br />
Squrce of variation<br />
Treatnent (2)l<br />
r.<br />
x<br />
Periods (2)<br />
Ptes (5 )<br />
I,ocatlon (l)<br />
Treatnents x<br />
Í,ocatlon (2)<br />
Perlods x Locatton (2'<br />
Plgs x Locatlon (J)<br />
Error (1ó)<br />
ÂI,A<br />
8o5.02xx )'+7,22xx<br />
5.r7 7.29<br />
L7.64x L7,39x<br />
,Ì00.00Æ 2go.7oÆ<br />
,+6.3trÆ 2o.5Lx<br />
2.29 2.23<br />
8.t1 9,23<br />
4.87 ¡t.68<br />
Nu¡nbers ln parentheses lndicåte the degrees of freedon.<br />
(P4.05)<br />
(P@.01)<br />
GLY<br />
8t+.5l.loc L7l+.53xx<br />
L.38 L3.t+5<br />
3.82 bL.36xx<br />
L62.9grü 2288.orxx<br />
11.32xx L.56<br />
o.8) 3,.37<br />
1.4r 35.3Ø<br />
1.38 8.5r<br />
TYR<br />
100.73)o( 170.58xx 1?O, Ogxx<br />
0.20 2.O3 2.87<br />
25.O8 10.03x 7,26<br />
L167.36xx 633,36Æ tgt.OOro(<br />
7,29 Lt+.52x L2.6Lx<br />
b.Lg L,35 3.5L<br />
18.0t+ ,+.s3 2.25<br />
Lt.42 3,06 2.78<br />
L53.3ü¿ 265.IOxx<br />
o.95 2.20<br />
L,+.33'q 3.60<br />
682.95xx L796 '3,Lr;x<br />
12.8610( 5[.L6)cx<br />
L.33 0.5r<br />
4.b5 2.66<br />
l.60 5.75<br />
¡\)<br />
À)
APPENDIX TABLE 8. Mean squares of the analyses of variance for<br />
the apparent ileaI and fâeca1 availabilities<br />
of [ifET and CIS for study 2a.<br />
AMINO ACTDS MET cYs<br />
Sourcq of variation<br />
Treatnent (2 )l<br />
Periods (2)<br />
Pies (Z)<br />
Location (1)<br />
Treatnent x<br />
Location (2)<br />
Periods x location (2)<br />
Pigs x Location (2)<br />
Error (4)<br />
L?7.O3Æ<br />
2.75<br />
7.86<br />
0.14<br />
à.26<br />
0.2L<br />
L.62<br />
2.3t<br />
59.58<br />
0.83<br />
2.60<br />
383.64Ð'<br />
3.98<br />
5.O5<br />
0.16<br />
L2.lrZ<br />
llumbers in pàrentheses indicate the degrees of freedorc.<br />
(P
APPENDfX TABLE 9. The lnalir¡ídual metabollc 11e41 anino acid and nitrogen Levelsl,<br />
tn addltion to dry ¡trâtter digestlbilities and dally dry natter<br />
intake for plgs fed the nalntenance dieùs.<br />
LEVET, OF ALPHAFLOC (ø,<br />
PIG NUMBER<br />
AMINO ACTDS<br />
Essential<br />
ÀR0<br />
HTS<br />
ILE<br />
I,EU<br />
LÏS^<br />
MET¿<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
V.AL<br />
ASP<br />
GI,U<br />
GLY<br />
Pno<br />
SER<br />
TÏR<br />
NITROCEN<br />
DRY MATTER DTCESTIBÍLITY (ø)?<br />
DRY MATTER DIGESTIBILTTT (ø }4<br />
DRY MATTER TNTAKE<br />
I 3<br />
4<br />
.0ór .o39<br />
.o7, .065<br />
.r39 .L2?<br />
.186 . o85<br />
.l+6r+ .2r+3<br />
.o7, .06,+<br />
.o2r+ .017<br />
,27L .181<br />
85.8 87.o<br />
9r.2 85.6<br />
825 162r<br />
. o4r<br />
.016<br />
.03r.<br />
.035<br />
.o33<br />
.o07<br />
.018<br />
.Ol+2<br />
.0ll+<br />
.Ol+2<br />
.oóo<br />
.L22<br />
,L22<br />
.494<br />
,072<br />
.or5<br />
.224<br />
86.4<br />
88.7<br />
1560<br />
rl<br />
.o27 ,o35 .04ó<br />
.o09 ,012 .016<br />
.o29 ,o33 .o3o<br />
.o3¡¡ .01+8 .046<br />
.028 .039 .046<br />
.008 .o11 . otl<br />
.oL7 .O27 .O29<br />
.038 .o52 .o47<br />
.o32 .O43 .041<br />
.o35 .Ot+5 .061<br />
.o59 .O72 .076<br />
.LO7 .lzt+ .120<br />
,090 .090 .L29<br />
.2b8 .27O .4t+9<br />
.o59 .O55 .062<br />
.orlt .021 .019<br />
.\76 .222 .31O<br />
86.9 86,7 77.L<br />
90.8 86.3 90. o<br />
t¡.59 L586 52L<br />
Expressed as grans per iOO gran dry ¡natter intake. 2 Deterrnlned by acld hydrolysLs !<br />
fleal dry natter d1gèstfbtllties ln thls row vrere based on the chronlc oxlde nethod. ]<br />
fleat-
ÂPPEI'lDrr TABLE Lo, The lndividual Í¡etabollc faEcal a¡nlno acid and nitrogen levelsl,<br />
. In adrJitlon to dry natter dlgesttbllltles for pigs fãa tñe -nalntenance<br />
diets.<br />
PIG NI'}IBER<br />
AMINO ACIDS<br />
Ëssential<br />
--TRG-<br />
HIS<br />
II,E<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS^<br />
I4ET¿<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
--rrî-<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
c¿T<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÏN<br />
NITROGEN<br />
DRY MATTER DIGÐSÎIBILITY (ø)<br />
.049<br />
.oL7<br />
' Otld<br />
.060<br />
.068<br />
.o25<br />
.ot+1<br />
. 050<br />
.055<br />
.0,66<br />
.101r<br />
.130<br />
.o55<br />
.060<br />
. o49<br />
.036<br />
.204<br />
90.1<br />
.0¡rg<br />
.o?3<br />
'o92<br />
'otrz<br />
, ot+l<br />
.034<br />
-026<br />
. r.50<br />
9o.0 92<br />
1 Expressed as grams per 1OO grân dry natter inteks.<br />
2 Deternlned by acld hydrolysls.<br />
.92?<br />
.010<br />
.o31<br />
.937<br />
.g4o<br />
.ql5<br />
.925<br />
.o3o<br />
.o34<br />
.o19<br />
.008<br />
,O27<br />
.O37<br />
.038<br />
.011<br />
.o21<br />
.026<br />
.O29<br />
,o24<br />
.o1ó<br />
.O28<br />
.Otrz<br />
,036<br />
.OL2<br />
.026<br />
.03o<br />
.o33<br />
.o58<br />
. o20<br />
.O7L<br />
.!25<br />
.o9i<br />
.O3t+<br />
.o7t+<br />
.0óô<br />
,085<br />
.0r+1 .036 .0,10 .log<br />
,065 .016 .c/62 ,L53<br />
.o93 .o82 .o77 .L97<br />
.q¡r .o28 .o32 . o87<br />
.o34 .032 .026 .109<br />
.o3g .o34 .o28 .o?i<br />
.or8 .016 .o2o .oü<br />
.L20 .111 .L33 ,323<br />
.o 92.2 9L,2 85,8<br />
.o22 .0r+1 .03r<br />
.009 .o18 . old<br />
.03o .046 .038<br />
.or+[ .o72 .O57<br />
.o37 .O59 .O5t+<br />
.0r3 .020 .OL9<br />
.o28 .043 .O35<br />
.O33 .O50 .0,¡L<br />
.036 .05r+ .ob5<br />
.0[r+ .066 .056<br />
.0ó6 .101 .086<br />
,09o .13O .116<br />
.o33 .05r .0r+rr<br />
.o57 .063 .o53<br />
.o39 .O5) ,O45<br />
.o22 .O31 .026<br />
.L35 . r.98 .166<br />
87.3 86.5 86.À<br />
'05L<br />
.079<br />
.lLt<br />
. or¡1<br />
.062<br />
.Ol+5<br />
.o23<br />
,169<br />
85.9<br />
.05l+<br />
.o8L<br />
.106<br />
.o42<br />
.055<br />
, o44<br />
.o25<br />
.169<br />
d6.8
APPEND* 'ABLE 11' Ti:ir;f,Tîiîì":l iiîlåË:;<br />
Source of VariatÍon<br />
Degrees of Freedom<br />
AT1]NO ACTDS<br />
Essent iaI<br />
-tr-nT-<br />
LTTC<br />
ÏLE<br />
LEU<br />
M¡<br />
¡r:ET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
--lïî_- Irion-Essential<br />
ASP<br />
CLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
N TTROGEN<br />
DRY I,IATI'ER<br />
xx<br />
( P
DDi:¡nTi1'r1' ñ1<br />
^ ^ E.r ¿r ì ¡II 1¿J¡{]J¿.t ! ¡\DJJJJ J-'. ^<br />
229<br />
The individual apparent faecal ar:rino<br />
acid avail-abilities fror:r barle;' i n<br />
study 2b, in addition to nitrogen<br />
and dr]' rnatter digestibilities.<br />
PERTOÐ -r 1 111<br />
PïG I'llll'ßER<br />
AÌ'lmo AcIÐs (É)<br />
Essential-<br />
AR,G<br />
HÏS<br />
ILE<br />
iEU<br />
],YS<br />
¡81<br />
.r-J1¿<br />
T,TR<br />
YAL<br />
Ìion-Es s ent ial<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
GI,U<br />
GiY<br />
¡_:.Lu<br />
SER,<br />
lYn<br />
NITROGETI (I)<br />
DRT I.;ATTER (ií)<br />
88.0<br />
89.8<br />
80.6<br />
85.3<br />
nè n<br />
/>.ö<br />
87.r<br />
79.2<br />
82.8<br />
.â .)<br />
76,t,<br />
olo<br />
or_.4<br />
s4.9<br />
Õ).t<br />
è. ')<br />
82. o<br />
87 .0<br />
o),Y<br />
n< a<br />
80.9<br />
Ad'o<br />
68.7<br />
82.3<br />
71, .I<br />
75.2<br />
Áô?<br />
68.5<br />
89. o<br />
1¿.O<br />
èaì È<br />
81 .4<br />
/¿J.O<br />
82.7<br />
ê1 a1<br />
çnn<br />
d"d<br />
"o .È<br />
.)+.¿<br />
oo A<br />
tö. /<br />
dÁ ar<br />
1ó.4<br />
82.0<br />
NE E<br />
or rì<br />
8t.2<br />
ot<<br />
8¿*.0<br />
d1 ,)<br />
ó¿.1<br />
da ¡<br />
öo.ö<br />
d'7 Ê<br />
"o i<br />
'7t è<br />
ö1.¿<br />
JoÈ<br />
o¿.¿<br />
'iA t<br />
/o.o<br />
o'1 '1<br />
8r.9<br />
o)t<br />
85.0<br />
Ò1 't<br />
82.L<br />
(\? l<br />
87 .5 SZ.r<br />
88. ó 87 .L<br />
80.3 8l_.1<br />
8t+.7 ô4.9<br />
a4 ) ,7t <<br />
77.2 80.9<br />
86.6 86.8<br />
78.9 79 .2<br />
.tr /{<br />
Õr..Þ ô¿.4<br />
75.6 ?5.2<br />
I >. / i ) .o<br />
9r.9 92.6<br />
80.7 81.0<br />
90. 3 9!.t+<br />
8t+.7 B¿+.9<br />
èa Ë, d" ê<br />
t.L. ¿/ r).v<br />
83.5 78.3<br />
Ar ^<br />
ÒI.J oj-.O
APPIi'iDi:i TAEL¡ 1l .<br />
PER,ÏOD<br />
PTG NUiGER,<br />
Ai'iti\io Ac TDs (i¿ )<br />
Es s -:m- entie.l<br />
HIS<br />
]LE<br />
LJU<br />
LYS<br />
I'i¡ 1<br />
PIÌE<br />
TI{R,<br />
VAI,<br />
I] U¡.(- JJÈ ù € II U I dI- -_T1r-<br />
ÁeD<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TÏR<br />
rirrRocEN (i¿ )<br />
ÐAI I-IATTER (:í)<br />
93.3<br />
9r.0<br />
ar, . ù<br />
ÕÒ.Õ<br />
88 .7<br />
89.0<br />
92.0<br />
Òt. t<br />
95.3<br />
ðð. z<br />
9)+.L<br />
9r.7<br />
YL.J<br />
90 .1<br />
230<br />
ihe individual apparent faecal arnino<br />
acid availabi.Iities Íron corn in<br />
siud)' 2b, in addition '"o ni.tro6en<br />
and dry matter ciige st ibili*"ie s.<br />
aY.l<br />
9r.2<br />
ô) . ¿<br />
>z.v<br />
78.8<br />
,3 l,)<br />
Ò).+<br />
ðo. o<br />
0c. ¡/<br />
84.2<br />
o))<br />
ö¿l.u<br />
êÈo<br />
ÕO. ¿t<br />
86.2<br />
s8. E<br />
ol l<br />
93.4<br />
%.6<br />
éJ.L<br />
Ò1.4<br />
ol ?<br />
9t.L<br />
87.0<br />
93.2<br />
90.9<br />
90.3<br />
ðð.o<br />
89.6<br />
o't t<br />
ôro<br />
ô(.Y<br />
>).o<br />
Õ¿.¡)<br />
éo.J<br />
9r.2<br />
c).4<br />
c't..t<br />
89.6<br />
öo.)<br />
c? c<br />
86.0<br />
020<br />
cìar 2<br />
doo<br />
88.9<br />
89.3<br />
ITT<br />
ÊÕool?<br />
v./. -/ /L.t<br />
9r.r 91.2<br />
4c. O
.dPPri'iÐrr TAELE 14.<br />
23L<br />
The individual apparen-i, faecal altino acici<br />
evailabilities fron wheat in sludy 2b,<br />
in additi"on to ni*,,roêen and dry<br />
r,latter digestibilities.<br />
PERTCÐ irï<br />
PIC liil'",E¡,R<br />
Ar:rÌ{0 ÀcÐs (f )<br />
ãs sent ial<br />
-æ-äis<br />
TLE<br />
ï.,¡ü<br />
LTS<br />
t=T<br />
PäË<br />
TiiR,<br />
V.{L<br />
-.ffi- lion-fssential<br />
^ êD<br />
GiU<br />
GIY<br />
PRO<br />
c:tD<br />
lYR<br />
r'¡rra,oc¡ìN (É)<br />
Ð.ìT iiATTEr (i6)<br />
or Ê<br />
9U.7<br />
90.0<br />
80.9<br />
ÕÕ. )<br />
93 .4<br />
à6.7<br />
89. E<br />
d, E<br />
83.7<br />
97.3<br />
89.4<br />
97.L<br />
O' A<br />
90.7<br />
9L.3<br />
Õ(). Õ<br />
93.4<br />
oà l<br />
90.5<br />
92.7<br />
82.8<br />
90,7<br />
93.7<br />
90.4<br />
aA '1<br />
rJ).o<br />
o?(<br />
90.8<br />
o,J )<br />
o? ?<br />
91.0<br />
Ya',)<br />
88.9<br />
92.8<br />
95.o<br />
ôaì I<br />
ot ?<br />
81.8<br />
88.0<br />
ot Ã<br />
öt. t<br />
89.0<br />
Õ) , )<br />
97 .t+<br />
.+ô o<br />
90.1<br />
orÀ<br />
ö/.4,<br />
%.2<br />
94.6<br />
ÕÕ. )<br />
ôlt<br />
Õr.o<br />
85 .0<br />
otL<br />
ö) , ><br />
61.1<br />
8r.ó<br />
96.8<br />
ÒÕ.¿<br />
96.6<br />
88.9<br />
90.6<br />
d?d<br />
9J.L<br />
Õt. .7<br />
90. B<br />
o).2<br />
óy. o<br />
01 Á<br />
oa.¿<br />
94.+<br />
90.4<br />
Õ).)<br />
.-ia 1<br />
69.t<br />
a¿.¿<br />
69. ó<br />
6'0.1<br />
OJ.U<br />
ðo.4 /o.¿<br />
ö), / / ).u<br />
/t.v //..+<br />
yu. o ó4. o<br />
Õ,1 t. ÒA a<br />
./1.+ /v.-<br />
./J.)<br />
e/.)<br />
Yv./ ór.)
AppJNDïï. TAËLI 15 lríean squares of the analyses of variance of the metabolic faecal<br />
anino acid and nítrogen excretion from study 2b.<br />
Source of<br />
variat ion<br />
Degrees of<br />
fr ee donr<br />
AIll\0 ACïDS<br />
Essen bial<br />
---Ãm-<br />
Hts<br />
rLìJ<br />
L]IIJ<br />
!.1Þ<br />
¡UDT<br />
PI"lit<br />
1IlJl<br />
I/AL<br />
Itron-ilssential<br />
--am'--<br />
ASP<br />
GLU<br />
rrL f<br />
PRO<br />
SlìB<br />
TYIi,<br />
NÏT¡lOGTJN<br />
(P
^P 'llJi}J¡. T^LLJ 1ó' The individunl .nìetabolic laoc¿L onino acid and nitro,:cn cxcrcL-ior.<br />
pi¿s fed<br />
fro¡<br />
the 7ij ðlphafloc måintenance diet,<br />
TT ÍD OT COLL]JCTION<br />
Ptq lüui Ðr,rlt<br />
Âii.[No<br />
^crDs<br />
Ðss ----htõ- sntial<br />
ftls<br />
rUtì<br />
LËU<br />
t͡T<br />
PII.lrj<br />
Tlill<br />
i//\L<br />
l;on-lìssential<br />
.{L/r<br />
A5P<br />
CLU<br />
GLÏ<br />
Pn0<br />
SdI¿<br />
TÏI¿<br />
.0u<br />
.036<br />
.o56<br />
. ol+o<br />
.or7<br />
.03 5<br />
.o4t<br />
'olrz<br />
.o52<br />
.o¿¿<br />
.100<br />
.040<br />
.ot+I<br />
.041<br />
.026<br />
T.IIT:tOG]4N .Il+3 .r27<br />
ET]TORII C1IREAL T1,IS1 DIATS<br />
.o25 ,016 .Ot6 .021 .O2L .0l.6<br />
.007 .007 .OO7 .OO7 .OOC .OOB<br />
,o32 .O21 .018 .026 .OlO ,O2_5<br />
.o45 .026 ,O2?, .041 ,Or+9 .0lO<br />
,925 .O25 .O2r+ ,O)3 .O¿rO .028<br />
.011+ .oa1 .00e ,or2 .013 .009<br />
.o2-7 .016 .018 .026 .O2ç ,019<br />
.0.11 .019 ,02I .026 .O32 ,O2)<br />
.o35 ,o22 .O22 .O32 .Oi? .O27<br />
,oÐ .o27 .O29 .0À0 .ot,i .Ol3<br />
.06¿ .oLj .aB .062 .aò9 .or1<br />
.o9L .064 .o55 .o75 .o¿i9 .o7t)<br />
.o35 .O72 ,O2t+ ,O32 .036 .Ozt+<br />
.o3) .O2' .O2r+ .o2? .oi) .026<br />
.o4o .02'3 .oz2 .o29 .o3'j .o3U<br />
.o22 .O1.2 .oli .ol8 .929 , ,012<br />
.7O2 .094<br />
.111<br />
.109<br />
.013<br />
.006<br />
,033<br />
,o37<br />
.o72<br />
.020<br />
.026<br />
.03 \.<br />
,035<br />
.o57<br />
.10ó<br />
.026<br />
.033<br />
,o+6<br />
. 01¡+<br />
ÄFTER CDRII\L Tì'S1' DIETS<br />
.ozl<br />
,008<br />
,o2g<br />
,ol+2<br />
.036<br />
.013<br />
.o2r<br />
.o3l<br />
.033<br />
'ol+2<br />
,06t*<br />
.078<br />
.033<br />
.o26<br />
. 031<br />
.019<br />
. 015<br />
.00í)<br />
.o23<br />
,o29<br />
,o23<br />
. otl<br />
,017<br />
.o2L<br />
.02t,<br />
.028<br />
.0/+6<br />
.07r<br />
,o23<br />
.o28<br />
.429<br />
. oll<br />
.111 .L26 ,10r .110<br />
,or7 .o2)<br />
.007 .009<br />
.o25 .036<br />
.a)2 .ot,5<br />
.OZ(t ,O3?<br />
,oI2 .OI7<br />
.018 .o25<br />
.o23 .otj<br />
.026 .q)<br />
.030 ,olr2<br />
.ot+9 .o74<br />
.A7 t+ .111<br />
.o24 .o33<br />
.o2t .q6<br />
.o3? ,0r¡ó<br />
,01t ,020<br />
'II+7<br />
N)
AP-)lliDlll TAllLf l?. 'ihe in{tividual ¡rrctabolic faecal a¡rino acid ând ni¿ro0en excrction fro¡¡l<br />
pigs fed the 14la alphafìoc r¡lâintenance diets'<br />
TI lri OÌ' 1j0l],ri0'1':toN<br />
PTG NIJÌ.J'rijl¿<br />
/\IiINO ACTDS<br />
!¡e3r!j.e]<br />
IITS<br />
ILd<br />
LJJU<br />
PIIE<br />
TIIII<br />
V.At<br />
llon-issential<br />
-.4_î-i-<br />
3Lti<br />
r'l¿0<br />
sliiì.<br />
lYn<br />
.o29<br />
.013<br />
.038<br />
.o56<br />
.ol+7<br />
.03 5<br />
,ot+o<br />
.o47<br />
.o59<br />
.088<br />
.109<br />
.o47<br />
.04.0<br />
.0/+r<br />
.o26<br />
r;TT.ì0cntii .L65 .Ì80<br />
tiEItoR[ CLnjiAL D]lil'll<br />
.ol0 .o33 .023<br />
.oto .010 .003<br />
,OLr2 .Ot+L ,O33<br />
.069 .062 .o52<br />
.ot 9 .050 .041<br />
.018 .018 .013<br />
.o39 .o)7 .o33<br />
.ot+5 .o52 .o39<br />
,0r*8 .o52 ,AL3<br />
,060 .070 .o52<br />
.09r .094 .o77<br />
,r11 .I)4 . ro0<br />
.0&¿j .o55 .otv)<br />
.o39 .04.r . o/+/+<br />
.o\.2 .olr7 .439<br />
.026 .o29 ,O23<br />
. 161<br />
.032<br />
.008<br />
. 03lr<br />
.o55<br />
.o39<br />
. ot5<br />
.433<br />
. o[0<br />
,o42<br />
.Ol+9<br />
.079<br />
,095<br />
, ot*o<br />
.o43<br />
.039<br />
.025<br />
.tÌ+5<br />
.ol8 .o2o .o29<br />
.0t5 .oo9 .0Ì4-<br />
.or+5 .o32 .045<br />
.065 .o43 .06rr<br />
.o55 .q6 .o55<br />
.o1B .Ot7 .026<br />
.o)7 .o25 ,o35<br />
.or+3 .031 .OL)<br />
,o57 .o35 .0i0<br />
.o5B .043 .066<br />
.099 .o74 . 09¿'<br />
.I:,2 .096 . rlq<br />
.oL5 .o32 .04 6<br />
.oiz ,o3? .Otç3<br />
,o52 .o37 .o53.<br />
.o2¿ ,o2o .426<br />
,205<br />
.2t l<br />
AFTEn CDRllrtL DI]jTS<br />
.o27 .028<br />
.olt .or2<br />
.o35 .o32<br />
.050 .ot+5<br />
.o)9 .o42<br />
.o22 .015<br />
.010 .026<br />
.o37 .031<br />
.o39 .o37<br />
. o5o ,o\t+<br />
.0114 , o7o<br />
.09ri .o93<br />
. o3B .o3 t+<br />
.021 .03 0<br />
.otl . otl<br />
.o3) .o|g<br />
.04_t .081<br />
,o37 .060<br />
.013 ,O2tl<br />
.ozt* .a+4<br />
.026 .O59<br />
.o34 .O'i 1*<br />
. orr0 .076<br />
.06rþ ,I)9<br />
.lo4 .Lt+L<br />
.03 r .o59<br />
.o)9 .031<br />
.o3'Ì .o37<br />
,o22 .O20<br />
.04.0 .o52<br />
,0114 .o55<br />
.0rl . ol4.<br />
.166 .L62 .IL9 ,207<br />
N)
APP¡jl'{DIX TAELI¡ 18<br />
Source of' Vari-ation<br />
Degrees of Freedorn<br />
rTEltS<br />
l.litrogen retained (e;/d"v )<br />
ltritrogen retainecll<br />
I\itrogen retention (Íi ) 2<br />
Diological vatue (î3 )3<br />
I, 2, 3 As shov¡n in Table 28.<br />
x (n(0.05 )<br />
.ftnalyses of variance betr"¡een treattûents I'or pararneters<br />
rrteasured in study 3a.<br />
ROlJS<br />
(Prcs )<br />
2<br />
o.7647<br />
o.CIoz?34<br />
Lþ ,427 5<br />
5.6t+59<br />
COLU'iNS<br />
( PEIìIOÐS )<br />
2<br />
(ltean squares )<br />
1.3803<br />
o.001269<br />
r.Q)14<br />
8.4700<br />
TIìilATitrlNTS<br />
4.624t+x<br />
o.orl537<br />
62.5195x<br />
7B.L2tþ5x<br />
LltROn<br />
t<br />
o.22:-6<br />
0.000698<br />
r.1611<br />
r.6782<br />
N
APPDNDI"( 1Âlj],Ë 19 The indtvidual apparent iLeaJ- and faecal amino acid availabilities<br />
from wLgle wheat in study ¿la, in addition to nitro6en and dry<br />
nratter digestibilities and average daily dry natter intake.<br />
D¡.]<br />
PlC NUIIBðN<br />
L0c^Ttol{<br />
Át{rNc.4crDS (.1)<br />
-lRc- Ðssentiel<br />
8?.2<br />
Hrs 88.6<br />
rLE 89.r<br />
LIU 89.7<br />
LYS 80.2<br />
rar %.6<br />
P E 90.9<br />
T¡IR ?9.O<br />
v.¡ìL r]6.1<br />
l\"on-lssential<br />
--ìr-ì- no )<br />
ÄsP ¿r,tl<br />
cLU 95.8<br />
c¿Y 69.9<br />
PRO BO, d<br />
ùlllr o), I<br />
TTR 87,9<br />
N rrRocEi'r (ii) tì4.7<br />
DRY I.:1ìTTEn (,J ) ?B.o<br />
DIìY ¡;ATT¡;II L)67<br />
IN1¡KD (s/day )<br />
12-r8<br />
ILüUi'i FAÊCìJS ILLUÌ.I FA¡JCÌiS TLÌ'UÌ.J FIrUCTS IL.ITJUI'I FÂIOì¡S ]iÙUi i<br />
94.1 88. ó<br />
93.4 89.8<br />
9r.6 90.6<br />
92.8 91.0<br />
86.1 ',¿r.z<br />
93.7 93 .t+<br />
93 .5 9r.6<br />
88.8 ?8.6<br />
9r.,3 86.9<br />
8¿,4 80.9<br />
87 .3 81. I<br />
97.8 95.9<br />
9O.2 7 5.8<br />
96.5 t:5.7<br />
%.7 â6.9<br />
92. r+ 89.2<br />
93.o 86.6<br />
89.2 8o.4<br />
1367<br />
9rr.3 89,4<br />
9?.5 89.7<br />
91.8 90.4<br />
93.3 90.9<br />
r)7 .o dl.ó<br />
9l+.2 92.9<br />
9t+.I 92.2<br />
89,6 {rr.4<br />
91.9 8B,2<br />
8{J.8 83.4<br />
88.6 84-. r<br />
97.9 96.3<br />
91.0 111.2<br />
97.6 92.5<br />
24.o É18.&<br />
93 .2 ',ég .7<br />
%.6 í18. o<br />
89.9 78.9<br />
) t+- t+o<br />
9r*.2 85.9<br />
91+.O 85.9<br />
ti9.8 85.2<br />
2?.2 . t)4. ¿<br />
29.7 ( z.o<br />
go.1 8¡j. i*<br />
93 ,6 89.7<br />
¿l¿,.1 73,7<br />
90.3 Bl.¿l<br />
gr+.0 , 86.?<br />
9t,,5 BB.2<br />
g2.o 89.6<br />
')).r 2o.2<br />
35.9 Bo. r<br />
94.o 94.t+<br />
gt+.6 92.2<br />
¿J8.ri 7d.1<br />
9r,7 87.6<br />
55-62<br />
rÂUCDS fLiluli ¡'Aiciris<br />
95.1 81.7 9L.{)<br />
94.9 88.,1 91..5<br />
92.8 89.5 9L,5<br />
94.0 9o.5 9).2<br />
87.6 81.0 ۓ6. o<br />
95.4 9r.9 9).L<br />
95.) 92.5 94,5<br />
9O.7 79.8 {19. o<br />
93 .6 rJ? .9 91 .6<br />
85.t+ 75,6 8d.2 78.8 90.0 79.5 87.9<br />
86.3 76.5 87.7 79.7 89.9 81.5 8Û,0<br />
97,7 9t+.5 97.9 95.4 9¡l.r 95.8 97.9<br />
89.8 76.t+ 90.6 65.5 9r.5 66.7 9A.6<br />
9t+,i 9r.5 97.O 59.5 9ri.1 5r+.5 96,6<br />
93 .3 63 .8 95 ,6 Û5 .9 95 .3 87 .o 9r¡.r<br />
9r,2 86.6 92.7 9o,9 94.8 9r.o 92.9<br />
92.6 Ei+. r %,r 8l+,r 9t+.5 83.6 93,1ç<br />
89. ¿ 75.,¿ 30.6 77.r Ë9.5 7 8.9 89.3<br />
16¿*O r72L<br />
L53A<br />
¡\)<br />
c¡.
ÂPP¿NDL( fÁirltl 20. The individual apparent ileal aDcl faecal arnino acid<br />
availabilit,lcs fro¡r flour in sl¡tdy ¿r_a, in addilrion<br />
to nitrogen and drl, xutter diðestíbilíties ¿nd<br />
averate dai.ly drl, ¡natler intake.<br />
D,{Y<br />
PIG NUÌ tìl ¿1ì<br />
LOCITTON<br />
ÂrrJNo<br />
^crDs (i¿ )<br />
_¡fõ- Essentiel<br />
Hrs<br />
ÏLË<br />
Litt<br />
92.5<br />
% .,¿<br />
93 .1<br />
gtr.a<br />
i-¿T 92.6<br />
TflR<br />
vAL<br />
,).1<br />
83,B<br />
9r.?,<br />
IJon-Essential<br />
lL^ 86.6<br />
ÁsP 8ru.1<br />
cLU 97.6<br />
cLY 86.9<br />
PRo 96.2<br />
Sln 9I.t+<br />
Trn 92.6<br />
rrrrnocIJl (,,i) 9r.7<br />
DnY r (ii) 9A.7<br />
^TTJR<br />
DnÏ l:¡TTilì 13 53<br />
Il;1¡l{r (ff/day )<br />
12-1d<br />
3t -to<br />
FAJCDS IL,]Uì,I IAECDS IL]lUIi FAECI'S IL¡]¡Jìì FA1TCES<br />
2^2.7 ?2.2 97.o 9g.L 95..r s2.? e6.3 q9.? e6.8 86J e4.?<br />
9^t!.2 9t+.o<br />
9^?.?<br />
97.7 e\.9 26.5 Þ+.2 gz.o<br />
%.h 9r.8 9tt.tt<br />
sL.z sz.1 s;:i si.s<br />
,-\.5 9r+.7 gtr.6 Çs.+ 2\.? se.s 9i.i e2.?<br />
?tr.4 95.1 25.2 95.T it*,t, i:6.i g5.r gz.l gi:õ el ?<br />
Be., 19-? ¡rr.B 9\.3 85.o úi.i iò.i ír'¿:, qtr:7 go.'o 6i:i áâ:ó<br />
%.\ 26.r et+.5 )9., )3.o ,t.l 2Z.Z 21.\ ei.ó %.2<br />
22'9 )-2'¿ e7.o %.L g'.L ei.i ii.í 29.2 2i.z i.6.ó 2t+.7<br />
2\.? 9\.3 e4.3 65.0 9r.e \L.i eà.t 87.4 9t+.8 ez.t 8d:ó<br />
)).o )2.2 95.5 %.1. s4.2 92.4 ti:o 93,3 96,3 %.i g¡.s<br />
89. ¡ 86, t )3.2<br />
¡Jó.9 E7 ,o 92.5<br />
98.4 97.9 9È.9<br />
92.7 83 .6 95.2<br />
)8. r+ 96.5 9s.6<br />
91.7 9r.4 97.o<br />
93.5 92.9 96.2<br />
94.6 91.I 96.8<br />
th.g 90 .5 95 .7<br />
r285<br />
35,7 9O.5 87.2<br />
85.8 8S,4. a>.?<br />
97..9 9t,.(, 9?,?<br />
'Ì6.6 93.3 85.5<br />
76.1 9{}.3 9t+.2<br />
9t.l 95.7 9r.8<br />
93 .5 93 .t 92.?<br />
39.6 95.2 92.5<br />
90.0 9L. t+ 90.4<br />
I5t+2 1621,<br />
92.2 85.6<br />
90.2 84,?<br />
9t.6 98.0<br />
9+.r 69,6<br />
98. t 73 .t+<br />
96.2 92.3<br />
9L 3 9r*.3<br />
96.2 89,6<br />
95.2 90. t+<br />
1550<br />
56-62<br />
TLDUIT FAECBS ILEU¡I FAICOS<br />
93 , 8 8t+.7 86 ,?<br />
92,4 ¿5.5 8t, -e<br />
99.I 98.0 9d, ó<br />
95.6 69; 90.8<br />
99.r 6r.7 98.0<br />
97,) 92,O 9L.o<br />
96,] 92.8 Ð.3<br />
96 .1 87 .6 94,6<br />
95 .6 89 .5 9l .8<br />
1550<br />
¡\)<br />
{
' 238<br />
APPENDTX ÎABLE 21. Tbe indlviduel epparear ileal and faecal<br />
anino acid availabilities from the B+S+M<br />
diet -in study ,+, Ín additÍon to nitrogen<br />
and dry natter digestibilities and<br />
êveragê daily dry nattêr intake.<br />
DAY 12-18 3l+-t+o 23-29<br />
PIG NI]I{BER<br />
LocÂtr0¡¡ IIEUII{ FÅECES ILEI}M FAECES ]I,EUM FAECES<br />
AMINo ACrm (ø)<br />
Essential<br />
-æG-- â6.5<br />
Hrs 81.,<br />
ILE 73.L<br />
IE-q 75.3 .<br />
Lrs 72.O'<br />
MET 73.5<br />
PHE 75.3<br />
rHR 53.9<br />
vAt 72.9<br />
Non-Essential<br />
ALA 69.9<br />
ASP 68.9<br />
GLt 86.i+<br />
GLY 67.L<br />
PRo 7L.5<br />
sEB 7L.8<br />
TTR 7L.3<br />
NITROGEN (ø) 7L.3<br />
DRT IITATTER (ø) I+3.6<br />
DRT ¡iÍATTER . 659<br />
I¡¡TAKE (e/day')<br />
92.L 8l}. r] gg.8<br />
9\.7 78.2 ÈZ.t+<br />
76.9 75.L 73 .4<br />
qr.3 76.9 76.9<br />
80.3 63.9 72.6<br />
q1.0 80.9 8O.?<br />
81.5 ?8.8 ?8,7<br />
7.r.3 60.5 69. j<br />
80.5 73.3 76.6<br />
78,6<br />
7È.9<br />
90.9<br />
80.0<br />
9L.l+<br />
Ê5.L<br />
81.2<br />
81.4<br />
66.L<br />
7L.O<br />
7L.2<br />
86.6<br />
t+9.6<br />
5?.8<br />
7t+.5<br />
7l+.o<br />
69.4<br />
I+5.8<br />
737<br />
75.7<br />
7l+,2<br />
89.7<br />
77.2<br />
86.9<br />
82.5<br />
77.7<br />
è3.5<br />
76.L<br />
70.5<br />
7L.L<br />
63.t+<br />
79.O<br />
7t+.0<br />
t+7.5<br />
68.t+<br />
69.8<br />
69.t+<br />
Èl+.5<br />
55.3<br />
78.6<br />
70.3<br />
68.1<br />
88.7<br />
87.5<br />
73.6<br />
77.9<br />
73.5<br />
83.8<br />
78.3<br />
69.L<br />
7L.L<br />
72.r<br />
73.8<br />
è9.2<br />
77.9<br />
90.3<br />
81.6<br />
77.t+<br />
d1.3 68.6 80.1<br />
65.6 t+o.5 63.3<br />
1168
APPENDIX TABIE, 22. The lndivlduaL appæént llea1 and faecal anl.no acid<br />
ave11abl1it,l6s fro¡n dlet B+S+M-D frorn study 4a, ln<br />
addltlon to nitrogen and dry nâtter dlgestlbtlltles<br />
and averege daily dry natter lntake.<br />
PIG MJMBER<br />
LOCATION<br />
ÀMrNo ACrD (ø)<br />
II,E<br />
I,EU<br />
LIs<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
75.7<br />
7L.8<br />
67.9<br />
7L.3<br />
53.6<br />
70. o<br />
72.5<br />
,+7 .o<br />
6b,5<br />
vAt<br />
Non-Essêntla1 --]Ã-lÃ-- 59.9<br />
ÂsP 6).3<br />
cLU 84.8<br />
GLY 5O.7<br />
. PRo 27.r<br />
sER 69,7<br />
TYR 66.5<br />
NITROGEN (ø) 62.9<br />
DRY MÀTTER (ø} 69.7<br />
DRT IITÂTTER L'86<br />
INTÀKE (e/dav l<br />
6? -?3<br />
67-73<br />
II,EU¡i,I FAECES IIEI'M FAECES TI,EUM TÂECES<br />
77.r 8.8.7 7o.? qg.8 2q.9 9.).3 74,1 91.4 73.L so.2<br />
Z\.2 91.Q z?.6 8ç.7 9Ê.? sB.? z6.8 ¿s.j ä.o áó:i<br />
70.4 68.0 70.3 76.' 6.2.2 7.7.2 67.9 77.3 72.o 7tr.2<br />
4.q 75.? 73.o 81.8 69.5 q2.9 ?o.i âà.-â it,.z ¿Jó:ö<br />
58..s Zz.s 60.3 zT.L 5.3.1 90.5 ,ç.\ gl.t<br />
79.7 64,' 79.o<br />
0á.g<br />
7\.2 â5.0 80.1 70.0 tà,i, i5:t<br />
ii.6<br />
6'..1<br />
72." 7r,9 74.1 92.2 7tr.7 83,5 ?2.5 ú.6 it.9 8i.6<br />
+ç.6 68.7<br />
6ê.e 40.e 7r,Z 42.r Zi.i iS.i 1i.6 i3.'8 7t+.2<br />
72.9 66.0 79.6 63.r ¿0.5 66.L 79.5 i'o.' i{.b<br />
65.6<br />
66.2<br />
8r.8<br />
t+6 .6<br />
t r.9<br />
69.r<br />
7L.7<br />
66.8<br />
70.7<br />
Lt+78<br />
70.5 60.9 78.L<br />
73.7 65.t ?9.2<br />
8d.6 8,+.j 9L.5<br />
75.5 25,6 80.r+<br />
73.o -93.5 78.5<br />
80.4 ó6.1 85.O<br />
72.8 70.L 78.2<br />
81.3 55.7 84.¡r<br />
83.6 66.ê 8t,.2<br />
I663<br />
l+9.9<br />
56.5<br />
81.O<br />
-7 .O<br />
-rsL,7<br />
63.5<br />
69.6<br />
4t.9<br />
68.5<br />
1818<br />
78.6 6L.7 79.O 66.3 7r.r¿<br />
8o.5 61.9 80.3 68.r¡ tz.e<br />
2?.4 gq.g<br />
83.1 92.L 85.5 9o.r<br />
40.6 Bt.6 j5,2<br />
qq.o i6.g<br />
-39't+ 79.5 -39.9 78.t<br />
q6.l 07.o 86.3 7L.5 8¡+.4<br />
83.6 6L.j 8z.o ¿;8.i zé.i,<br />
q4.1 58.5 8t'.2 6z.L 82.2<br />
84.2 69,.7 83.8 0g.g 83.6<br />
t756 t756<br />
N<br />
\o
APPLNDII T^ÐLit 23. The individual ¡netabolic iLeêl ¡ìnd faecêl _amino êcid, nitroqen<br />
and dry matter levels from pigs fed the 5,, alphafloc proLein-free<br />
diets, in €dditíon to averêge dêill1 dry matter intêke.<br />
DlY<br />
PIG NUI1BDN<br />
LOC,|\TION<br />
^l;tNo ActDsl<br />
ns sentÍêL -lre-<br />
¡lts<br />
ILf,<br />
LnLr<br />
.026<br />
.011<br />
. OIó<br />
.o2g<br />
r,ET<br />
PH_¡<br />
iR<br />
\¡^L<br />
Non- issêntie1<br />
--ìlTl--lrsP<br />
cïs<br />
cLU<br />
cLY<br />
PRo<br />
siR<br />
TYR<br />
.005<br />
,018<br />
.a33<br />
.O28<br />
ôro<br />
.ot+4<br />
,011<br />
.O5)<br />
.066<br />
.220<br />
.0lo<br />
.011<br />
liITnocÙllt "<br />
.Iz3<br />
DNY I.ATTJR, TA.26<br />
DIY l.lLTTliR 1368<br />
IlllÂrìi (¡/d¿y )<br />
rl.iiul: Fr',ocris<br />
,02)<br />
.012<br />
, ol0<br />
.ol+7<br />
. 04o<br />
.014<br />
.03)<br />
.0t0<br />
.0ó6<br />
.009<br />
.07Ê<br />
.o27<br />
, 110<br />
6.98<br />
,026 ,o22<br />
.011 , Ot 1<br />
,ot9 .030<br />
.435 .Orv5<br />
.o27 .019<br />
. 005 .01,1<br />
,020 .oze<br />
.o33 .o32<br />
.o27 .O3 5<br />
ô1r.<br />
^2 ô<br />
,ot*z ,a6rt<br />
.011 .009<br />
.0óo .o72<br />
.a78 .031<br />
. 146 ,ozt+<br />
.a32 .026<br />
2) -29<br />
I t,etnbolic ileal and faec¿1 anj.no acj.d lave1s Ì¡ere exFressed es g¡âns pcr Ì00 ¡¡rams<br />
of dry matter intake.<br />
.015<br />
,038<br />
,028<br />
.005<br />
.o22<br />
.0/+3<br />
.o)2<br />
.04e<br />
.060<br />
.013<br />
.6t*6<br />
.044<br />
.013 .015 .012<br />
.130 ,104 .252<br />
\.L2 6,56 1r .ë.5 6<br />
rló8 164z<br />
57<br />
.¡<br />
: S IL¡IUII FÂIìCES ILÌtUi: F^]]c,;s<br />
^ECi<br />
,019<br />
.010<br />
.o25<br />
.929<br />
.93+<br />
,010<br />
.o2+<br />
.o29<br />
.o32<br />
,03I .024r .061r , o2O<br />
;016 .o!2 .016 .OrO<br />
,O25 .)33 .O2I .A2+<br />
.9117 .ot+9 .o37 .018<br />
.010 .040 .oz-t .o))<br />
.005 ,010 .007 .ot1<br />
.o2¿ .O29 .O?-3 ,O23<br />
.o45 .o)5 .o)? .026<br />
.03¡, ,018 .o32 .o2g<br />
.083 .A2I<br />
,01¡ .009<br />
,A26 ,A22<br />
.0¡|.6 .ú6<br />
.o29 .a3)<br />
.oo? .oii<br />
,026 .o2?-<br />
.o4.2 .026<br />
.Oàg .o27<br />
,034<br />
.a5ê.<br />
.011<br />
.063<br />
.03 0<br />
.o)2<br />
.a25<br />
,oo8<br />
,090<br />
.0¿lo .0r*0<br />
.062 .069<br />
.013 .01r<br />
,o77 .o7?<br />
.o?9 .o))<br />
.2ra .031<br />
.03 8 .028<br />
.0I7 .012<br />
.161 .1r1<br />
.01*8<br />
.011r<br />
.07)<br />
'69t<br />
.0t 9<br />
,012<br />
.o29<br />
.05 $<br />
,011<br />
.o6t<br />
.o2B<br />
ôrt<br />
.424<br />
.018<br />
.095<br />
,050 .C3?"<br />
,067 .o51,,<br />
.01¿¡ . Olt<br />
.oet .a5f<br />
.zlt .A26<br />
õ'\ a<br />
.Arr5 .A23<br />
.015 .Ot6<br />
.31t .095<br />
,69 rl.ll 6,2r<br />
r6l+2<br />
12,93<br />
r6r,2<br />
15.5I<br />
6,3tr. r?,.La 6.0?,<br />
r6t+2-<br />
N)
ÂPPENDIX ?ABLE 24. Thê lndtviduql mstabolLc llêal and feecal amino acld,<br />
nllrogen and dry mattêr lev€1a fro4 pigs fed thè<br />
l0Ø alphafloc proteLn-free dlêb, In eddLtion to<br />
êvoraeê da1ly dry nâtter <strong>fn</strong>tåkè.<br />
DAT<br />
PIG NII1IBER<br />
I,OCÂTION<br />
.026 .041<br />
,01, ,0r9<br />
.o35 .o39<br />
.o53 .065<br />
,044 .046<br />
,015 .012<br />
.o)4 .o39<br />
.o35 .O55<br />
.Ol+t .O5,<br />
.o¡+ó .o55<br />
.o75 .085<br />
.011 .019<br />
.065 .110<br />
.o38 .111<br />
.038 ,'-3'.<br />
.o3o ,0r+6<br />
.013 .019<br />
.L26 .203<br />
LO.32 t7,I5<br />
1102<br />
56-62<br />
.otl<br />
.062<br />
.01¡l<br />
,o27 .0[6<br />
.0r5<br />
.o28 .062 .o?o .992 .g?g .0|,6 ,034<br />
,912 ..ói<br />
.oãó .ojö .óri .92? :i¡;z<br />
.oz2 .oi4<br />
:ðiT .ozs<br />
.oLi .oiã<br />
.o,+o<br />
:õíõ<br />
.9?9 .95e_ .9,,2 .950 .o3d .o¡Z<br />
.06õ :òãô .or4 .o55 .06r .olL<br />
:331 :3î3 :332 :3?? '3:d :2!t :ói¿ :óiá :õðô :ð;o<br />
.o2l+ .038 .o2t+<br />
.e4¿ .o¡z .ord :ili :Bãå Åh Ål¿i :"e3+ :Sãf :sie<br />
.031 .o5o .o3e .0Àr i .o5o .otl6 :óÀd .õ'íi :õiô :ói6<br />
.049 .or7 .044 .9tÌ2<br />
,962 .odz .066 .968<br />
' .Eg .ot¡, .063 .056 .063 .066<br />
.013 .013 ,Ol4<br />
.oÞt .oei :óÉ6 .o1¿ :ósá liör<br />
.OLz<br />
.069<br />
.Iqq<br />
.10o<br />
.oLi<br />
.o8o<br />
.L,+3<br />
.g?9<br />
.92'1 .10?<br />
.ãso<br />
.o9g<br />
:oLt .azz<br />
,1oo<br />
.otõ<br />
,083<br />
:i¿i_<br />
.ro7 .ii¡<br />
.õiz<br />
:3ä :3i3 :ðu 'åi: ,iil 'Ëåã .Ê21 'åiã ttf,f :ilZ<br />
.011 .016 .012<br />
--rr'.1tno ,o:Lî' -_.rg'.î?8 ,o:LL6 ,g'.228 ,ollåt ,sl33o ,olå?n ,r'.31, ,olält<br />
1561 L56L ,1040 r¿ié l|i'dd'-'<br />
tù<br />
H
APPENDIX TABLE 25.<br />
PIG NUMBER<br />
LOCATION<br />
AMINO ACTDS<br />
EssentlaL<br />
HIS<br />
II,E<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
-trÏÃ'--<br />
ASP<br />
cYs<br />
GLÜ<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
.050<br />
.013<br />
.026<br />
.050<br />
.o29<br />
.o10<br />
.o2g<br />
.o55<br />
.o39<br />
.050<br />
.073<br />
.01_8<br />
.084<br />
.L52<br />
.l+l+4<br />
.otû<br />
. oL3<br />
The tndtvidual ¡netabolic t1eal and faecal ar¡lno acidnitrogen<br />
and dry natter l_evels from piEs fed the<br />
L5% alphafLoc protein-free dlets, 1n-aãditton to<br />
average datly dry matter intake. -<br />
L-7<br />
NTTROGENI . .233<br />
DRT MATTERT 25.3t+ t5<br />
DRY PIATTER ?3O<br />
INTAKE (elaavl<br />
FAECES<br />
.o3z<br />
.01ó<br />
.orÌ3<br />
.063<br />
.o52<br />
.o28<br />
,o3d<br />
.o[r<br />
'or+9<br />
1 M"t.bolic i1eal and faecal levels<br />
intake.<br />
.061<br />
,o25<br />
.o3o<br />
.o52<br />
.o39<br />
. olr+<br />
.ozd<br />
,Ol+7<br />
.o39<br />
05l+<br />
088<br />
019<br />
o99<br />
0¡+3<br />
035<br />
035<br />
016<br />
.061<br />
.074<br />
.021<br />
.o97<br />
.L7lr<br />
.76L<br />
.055<br />
.0111<br />
L53<br />
27<br />
.281+<br />
26 .74<br />
L277<br />
t 5-5L<br />
r2-18<br />
.q?9 .0?1 .026 .084<br />
.914 .Ozt+ .013 .O29<br />
. O49 .031+ .Ot+? . 03ô<br />
,o7-2 .064 .063 .O1z<br />
. qó9 .046 .0,Ì5 .oit,<br />
.o2L<br />
.q44 .otû .ot+3 .gtl<br />
. q51 .O77 .Ot+? .Oi3<br />
.o59 .O52 .O57 .O59<br />
.068<br />
.!,07<br />
.oL5<br />
.L20<br />
'o5z<br />
.Olrz<br />
.o39<br />
.o23<br />
.L72<br />
L3.6t+<br />
.063<br />
.098<br />
.116<br />
.L82<br />
./,167<br />
.063<br />
. o21<br />
.272<br />
25.59<br />
LLOT<br />
.063<br />
.o92<br />
.ll_t<br />
.o53<br />
'otrz<br />
,o37<br />
.oL5<br />
.164<br />
t5.57<br />
rI,EI]M<br />
.067<br />
,o93<br />
3L-LO<br />
FAECES<br />
.o33<br />
.0r7<br />
.0r+5<br />
.o72<br />
-o¡o<br />
.o37<br />
.Or+4<br />
. o5o<br />
.055<br />
.o99<br />
.L25 .105<br />
.180 .o45<br />
.635 .038<br />
.061 .036<br />
.o23 .oL7<br />
.306 ,L53<br />
28.Lt+ L5 .27<br />
L532<br />
vtere .expressed as grans per LOO grams of dry matter<br />
N
APPENDIX TABLE 26. Analyses of variance: Mean aquares for apparent iLeal and faecalamlno<br />
acid availabllities, nitrogen and dry matter dlgest,ibilities<br />
fron finely ground and cracked wheat for sùudy lrb.<br />
Source of<br />
varlation<br />
Degrees of<br />
freedom<br />
AMTNO .A.CTDS<br />
Essential<br />
--rñG'-<br />
HIS<br />
rLE<br />
I,EU<br />
lrs<br />
MET<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
--¡m'--<br />
.{sP<br />
GLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYP"<br />
NITNOGEN<br />
DRT MATTER<br />
x<br />
xx<br />
(P
APPENDIÏ TABLE 27. Tle indivídual apparenü ileal and faecal anino acid availablLiries<br />
of ground_wheat fro¡n-study_l¿b, Ln additfon to nitrogen and dry<br />
matter dlgestlbilities and average daily dry matt,ei lntake.<br />
DAY<br />
PIG NUT4BER<br />
T.,OCATTON<br />
AMINo AcrDS (ø)<br />
Essentlal<br />
*ãnil-<br />
HIS<br />
ILE<br />
I,EU<br />
LYS<br />
¡[ET<br />
PHE<br />
THN<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essentlal<br />
-:a-f,î--<br />
ASP<br />
GT,U<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
9L.7<br />
90.I<br />
90.6<br />
92,L<br />
?8.7<br />
87.3<br />
93.3<br />
83.8<br />
89.<br />
NITROGEN (%) 89.1<br />
DRY MATTEN (%) 8]..1<br />
DRY MATTER 1830<br />
INTAKE 1s/davl<br />
'*<br />
82.8<br />
83.2<br />
96.tþ<br />
85.1<br />
90.3<br />
89.6<br />
90.2<br />
FAECES<br />
93.o 90. o 95.2<br />
23. ,1, 89. tl 95 . t+<br />
88.6 89.8 93.1t<br />
91.0 90.6 9U.2<br />
81.2 80.3 88.r<br />
86.+ +Z.t 90. j<br />
91..8 gz.L 9r+.6<br />
86.0 87.7 91.O<br />
88.9 87.5 93.2<br />
82.6 8r.8 90.1<br />
8lr. o 82.6 89.6<br />
97.3 96.3 98.2<br />
87.5 78.9 91.8<br />
9t+.6 86.3 9?.L<br />
9tr.5 87.O 9r+.2<br />
88.1 88.0 92.O<br />
9?.0 87.tr grr.3<br />
BB.3 79.t+ 89.r<br />
1830<br />
78-8U<br />
FAECES II,EI'M<br />
95.O<br />
93,6<br />
90. r<br />
9L.9<br />
8z.r<br />
90.4<br />
93.2<br />
83.0<br />
89.r-<br />
82.3<br />
82.8<br />
92.2<br />
81.6<br />
80.7<br />
88.0<br />
9L.5<br />
88.à<br />
80.1<br />
20Ir5<br />
FAECES<br />
95.L<br />
9l+.8<br />
92.6<br />
9I1.1<br />
86.7<br />
90.1<br />
9l+.6<br />
89,9<br />
92.6<br />
89.5<br />
89. O<br />
98.0<br />
91.1<br />
97.5<br />
9t+.3<br />
92.1+<br />
94.2<br />
89.2<br />
FAECES<br />
9L.3 9t+.2<br />
90. Ê 9tr.2<br />
9O.2 90.l}<br />
9r.7 92.3<br />
79.7 85.5<br />
87.2 88.6<br />
93.O 93.L<br />
80.3 88.0<br />
88.5 90.4<br />
8L.6<br />
82.6<br />
96.L<br />
8r.r+<br />
80. d<br />
88.3<br />
89.5<br />
8d.8<br />
8r. o<br />
2L53<br />
86.1<br />
86.8<br />
97.8<br />
89.8<br />
9t*.5<br />
93.3<br />
90.r1<br />
93.t+<br />
88.8<br />
¡ù
APPENDIÏ TABLE 28. . The indlvidual apparent ileal- and faecaL amino acld avaiLabilitles<br />
of cracked vüheat fron study l¡b, in addition to nltrogen and dry<br />
matter digestibilitles and average daily dry matter intake.<br />
DAY<br />
PTG NU}IBEÊ<br />
LOCATION<br />
AMINO ACIDS (ø}<br />
Ess ential<br />
HIS<br />
IIE<br />
LEU<br />
LYS<br />
I\MT<br />
PHE<br />
THR<br />
VAL<br />
Non-Essential<br />
ALA<br />
ASP<br />
OLU<br />
GLY<br />
PRO<br />
SER<br />
TYR<br />
86.8<br />
gtr.z<br />
81.8<br />
85. o<br />
6t+.o<br />
78.7<br />
87.8<br />
78.8<br />
79.3<br />
66.6<br />
7t.7<br />
93.3<br />
7Iþ.5<br />
87.t+<br />
83.6<br />
82.2<br />
NITROGEN (ø) 82.?<br />
DRT MATTER (ø) ?6.?<br />
DRT MATTER 2L6?<br />
INTAKE 1gldar)<br />
FAECES<br />
TI,EUM<br />
93.9 85.5<br />
93.5 85 .5<br />
89.3 85.L<br />
91.8 87 ,7<br />
82.? ?2.L<br />
8?,6 82.9<br />
93.o 89.6<br />
86.1 76.7<br />
90.6 83.r<br />
85.3<br />
85 .8<br />
97.5<br />
89.9<br />
95.L<br />
92.4<br />
89.4<br />
92.7<br />
88.8<br />
73.2<br />
77.t<br />
9l+.2<br />
70.o<br />
77.8<br />
85.4<br />
85.5<br />
8t+.9<br />
76.t+<br />
2059<br />
FAECES<br />
93.8<br />
94.L<br />
90.2<br />
92.5<br />
85.5<br />
88.6<br />
93.L<br />
88.9<br />
90.6<br />
86.5<br />
87.1<br />
97.9<br />
90.l+<br />
96.3<br />
93.5<br />
90.5<br />
93.1<br />
89.2<br />
78-84<br />
FAECES II,EUM FAECES<br />
86.9 gt+.t+ 86.6<br />
8? .5 gr+.t+ g5. g<br />
89.0 90.8 86.5<br />
à9.7 92.5 8?.8<br />
77 .9 8l+. I 76 .7<br />
8t+.5 9L.7 88.3<br />
90.9 93.L 89.2<br />
80.6 88.t 76.0<br />
85.tr 91.0 8L.¿<br />
'80.6 87,r+ ?7,9<br />
8r.6 87.1 78.7<br />
95 .3 97 .7 93.6<br />
78.8 90.0 ?4.5<br />
86.2 97.2 83.8<br />
85 .7 93 .L 8r+. r<br />
86.9 9L.9 86.5<br />
87.O<br />
78,6<br />
L8,{.2<br />
93.3<br />
88. 5<br />
84.0<br />
75.6<br />
2L67<br />
93.6<br />
93.tt<br />
89,4<br />
9L.5<br />
82.1<br />
90.7<br />
92.1+<br />
86.1<br />
89.7<br />
85.9<br />
8t+.6<br />
97.3<br />
89.1<br />
96.7<br />
d2. o<br />
90.6<br />
92.5<br />
88.6<br />
N