Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Badlands national park
Badlands national park, which included information on climate change in its tweets. Photograph: MyLoupe/UIG via Getty Images
Badlands national park, which included information on climate change in its tweets. Photograph: MyLoupe/UIG via Getty Images

Badlands national park – the new heroes of the resistance

This article is more than 7 years old

In today’s pass notes: the Twitter feed of the South Dakota park defied the Trump administration by posting facts about global warming. Was it an ex-employee or a rogue one?

Name: Badlands national park.

Location: South Dakota, United States.

Appearance: Vast wild prairies, rich fossil beds and magnificently sculpted buttes.

*Snigger*: Buttes are towers of rock formed by erosion. It’s pronounced bewt, actually.

Sorry, of course it is. Badlands is managed by the National Park Service, which is part of the US Department of the Interior, the role of which, among other things, is to “move our nation toward a clean-energy economy” and “coordinate climate-change science and resource-management strategies”.

I see. And now Americans have elected a president who says that’s all a secret Chinese plot that he has no proof of. Indeed. Needless to say he isn’t very popular at the NPS, whose Twitter account retweeted photos of the sparse turnout at his inauguration, and shared news of civil rights, climate change and healthcare pages disappearing from the White House website.

I can’t help cheering, but civil servants shouldn’t publicly undermine their elected bosses, should they? No. And the NPS Twitter feed was shut down for a day while they all got a good talking to. But now Badlands has struck back!

How come? On Tuesday, the Badlands National Park Twitter account began publishing blandly accurate information about climate change. For example: “Today, the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is higher than at any time in the last 650,000 years. #climate.”

Does President Trump disagree with that? Hard to say. I expect he’d get bored and stop reading.

No doubt. Anyway, the tweets were soon deleted.

Censorship! Not necessarily. The National Parks Service said that they were the work of “a former employee” who wasn’t supposed to have access. “The park was not told to remove the tweets but chose to do so when they realised their account had been compromised,” they said.

Is that true? Or has the new government already begun secretly burying inconvenient climate data? Well, we don’t have any evidence that the NPS is censoring things that Badlands would normally have said. The tweets were a bit out of character for Badlands, and another of its tweets about climate change since Trump took office still hasn’t been deleted.

So … we don’t know what to believe? No. Get used to it.

Do say: “Let’s kick butte!”

Don’t say: “Dangerous manmade climate-change is/isn’t happening and requires/doesn’t require urgent action. [Delete according to mood]”

More on this story

More on this story

  • Judge in environmental activist's trial says climate change is matter of debate

  • Green movement 'greatest threat to freedom', says Trump adviser

  • Prince Charles may raise climate change during Trump's visit to Britain

  • Theresa May must challenge Trump's 'contempt' for climate change, say MPs

  • EPA staff experiencing stress and fears Trump will suppress climate science

  • National Park Service climate change Twitter campaign spreads to other parks

  • National Parks Service 'goes rogue' in response to Trump Twitter ban

  • Resurrection of Keystone and DAPL cements America's climate antagonism

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed