Skip to main content
Log in

Frozen reduplication in Gizey: insights into analogical reduplication, phonological and morphological doubling in Masa

  • Published:
Morphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses analogy as a source of total reduplication in Gizey (Masa < Chadic < Afroasiatic). Building on the Dual Theory of reduplication, I first argue that CV- reduplication in the Masa branch of Chadic is a phonological duplication substituting for the segmental material of a now obsolete prefix (*mV-). I then show that a considerable number of total reduplicatives in Gizey derive from analogical reduplication (morphological doubling) entailing the shift from Proto-Masa *CV- reduplication to total reduplication (*CV- reduplication > TOTAL reduplication). The target sublexicon triggering this analogical shift consists of pre-existing ideophonic/onomatopoeic total reduplicatives. The lexical material examined in this paper is composed mainly of frozen reduplicatives i.e., word forms built by duplicating unattested bases. I show that these vestigial reduplicatives also allow for positing two other morphological doubling processes where specific cophonologies truncate specified phonological material. I also consider potential challenges dealing with infixal reduplication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The frozen reduplicatives described for Gizey and the other Masa languages can be found via this link: https://osf.io/up5v8/?view_only=c037935d91b54847ab8af7fc24279774

Notes

  1. In reconstructions of Proto-Chadic, the -VːCV reduplicative morpheme used in Mbara has been considered, though unavailingly, as a method for encoding nominal plurality (Newman, 1990). While being attested in contemporary West, Biu-Mandara, and East Chadic languages, it is not yet entirely clear whether the *-VC(V) formative belonged to Proto-Chadic or emerged independently as a later development in those branches. Newman (1990) has also suggested that Proto-Chadic likely used the reduplicative morpheme *CV- as the primary means for forming pluractionals, i.e. verbal forms denoting an action that is ‘done a number of times, by a number of subjects or affecting a number of objects’ (Newman, 2009, p. 620). Here too, the pluractional use of this formative is well attested in the West and Biu-Mandara branches, but it appears to be rare in East Chadic (Newman, 1990), and has not been reported for Masa.

  2. Mattes (2017) describes the semantic categories of frozen reduplication or ‘lexical reduplication’ as she refers to this phenomenon.

  3. In Gizey, clitics are “omni-locatable” (Dixon, 2010, p. 222) word-like forms attaching to the right (enclitic) of different constituent types (words or phrases) and different word classes (nouns, verbs, etc.) and which generally provide information about person/number, directionality, definiteness, etc. For example, the definite article =na (an enclitic) can be found after a noun (e.g., in []N= ‘things-pl2=art’ – ‘the things’) or after an extended NP (e.g. [[]N [má nàm l=ùm=íj]RC]NP= ‘things-pl2 rel 3sm do.pfv=3sm=res=art’ – ‘the things he did’) but still marking definiteness irrespective of the nature or size of its host.

  4. Marba and Lew form a dialectal continuum which will be referred to elsewhere in this paper as Marba-Lew.

  5. The glottal stop in the Marba-Lew form relates to restrictions on vowels occurring at word-initial position; the same restriction applies in Gizey and Masana.

  6. On 124 Marba words with ʔà- (identified in (Ajello et al., 2001), there are about 5% which correspond to total reduplication in Gizey and 95% which occur in their base form.

  7. Nominalization with *mV- might have undergone a decline in productivity in individual Chadic languages or branches (e.g., in Masa). This explains why it is no more attested in some languages or branches while others have maintained it.

  8. Note in passing that the intensification expressed by the -CV(C) construction type can be negative or positive as shown with the Zime examples herɓi-ɓe ‘small termitary’ < herɓe ‘termitary’ and tindiŋ-diŋ ‘very dark’ < tindiŋ ‘dark’ (Vincent, 2000).

References

  • Ajello, R. (2007). The linguistic expression of spatial relation in the Gizey language. In H. Tourneux (Ed.), Topics in Chadic linguistics IV: Comparative and descriptive studies. Papers from the 3rd biennial international colloquium on the Chadic languages (pp. 9–21). Rüdiger Köppe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajello, R. (2011). Anthroponyms in the Gizey society (N-E Cameroon). In M. Frascarelli (Ed.), A country called Somalia: Culture, language and society of a vanishing state (pp. 13–31). L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajello, R., & Melis, A. (2008). Dictionnaire Gizey-Français, suivi d’une liste lexicale Français-Gizey. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajello, R., Mayore, K., Melis, A., & Ousmanou, D. (2001). Lexique comparatif de six langues du Tchadique central (Gizey, Ham, Lew, Marba, Masa, Musey). Pisa: Edizioni Plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Hassan, B. S. Y. (1998). Reduplication in the Chadic languages. A study of form and function. Oxford: Peter Lang GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, S. D. (2012). Aspects of a Grammar of Makary Kotoko (Chadic, Cameroon). Linguistics Graduate Theses & Dissertations, 16. https://scholar.colorado.edu/ling_gradetds/16?utm_source=scholar.colorado.edu%2Fling_gradetds%2F16&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.

  • Ameka, F. K. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. R. (1992). A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, P. (1987). Reduplications in Saramaccan. Studies in Saramaccan Language Structure: Caribbean Culture Studies, 2, 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreteau, D. (1978). Aspects de la morphologie nominale du Mofu-Gudur. In J. P. Caprile & H. Jungraithmayr (Eds.), Préalables à la reconstruction du proto-tchadique (pp. 95–113). SELAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreteau, D., & Dieu, M. (2005). Linguistique. In Atlas de la province Extrême-Nord Cameroun (pp. 1–32). IRD Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetnarowska, B. (2020). Competition between synthetic NN compounds and NN.gen phrasal nouns in Polish: Semantic niches, hapax legomena and low-level construction schemas. In L. Körtvélyessy & P. Štekauer (Eds.), Complex words: Advances in morphology (pp. 241–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombel, V. de. (2005). La langue ouldémé (Nord-Cameroun). Grammaire, texte, dictionnaire. Leuven: Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ascenzo, F. (2019). I Gizey tra Camerun e Ciad. In L. Gaffuri, A. Melis, & V. Petrarca (Eds.), Tessiture dell’identità. Lingua, cultura e territorio dei Gizey tra Camerun e Ciad. (Figure 1, p. 2). Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dominicis, A. (2006a). Resyllabification phenomena in Gizey. In V. Giordani, V. Bruseghini, & P. Cosi (Eds.), Atti del terzo Convegno Nazionale dell’Associazione Italiana di Scienze dellaVoce 2006 (pp. 181–184). EDK Editore, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dominicis, A. (2006b). Tonal patterns of Gizey. In A. De Dominicis (Ed.), Undescribed & endangered languages: The preservation of linguistic diversity (pp. 60–163). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dominicis, A. (2008). Phonological sketch of Gizey. Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online, 6, 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic linguistic theory volume 1: Methodology. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougophe, S. (2015). The Morphosyntax of Mafa verbs [Unpublished master’s thesis, Université de Yaoundé I].

  • Frajzyngier, Z. (2002). A grammar of Hdi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frajzyngier, Z., Johnson, E., & Edwards, A. (2011). A grammar of Mina. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110893908.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, E. (1978). The verbal system in Dghweɗe. Linguistics, 212, 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffuri, L., & Melis, A. (2018). Pour une géographie des lieux sacrés gizey. Géographie et Cultures, 107, 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffuri, L., Melis, A., & Patrarca, V. (2019). Tessiture dell’identità. Lingua, cultura e territorio dei Gizey tra Camerun e Ciad. Napoli: Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooden, S. A. (2003). The phonology and phonetics of Jamaican creole reduplication. [Unpublished PhD thesis, The Ohio State University].

  • Gravina, R. (2014). The phonology of Proto-Central Chadic: The reconstruction of the phonology and lexicon of Proto-Central Chadic, and the linguistic history of the Central Chadic languages. Utrecht: LOT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüning, M. (2009). Semantic niches and analogy in word formation: Evidence from contrastive linguistics. Languages in Contrast, 9, 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S. (2008). The dual theory of reduplication. Linguistics, 46(2), 351–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2008.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S. (2014). The interplay of morphology and phonology. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., & Downing, L. J. (2015a). What is reduplication? Typology and analysis Part 1/2: The typology of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(12), 502–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., & Downing, L. J. (2015b). What is reduplication? Typology and analysis Part 2/2: The analysis of reduplication. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(12), 516–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, S., & Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, P. J. (2001). Hausa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. (2011). A grammar of Wangkajunga: A language of the Great Sandy Desert of North Western Australia. Canberra: Pacific linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, V. (2017). Iconicity in the lexicon: The semantic categories of lexical reduplication. Studies in Language, 41, 813–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A. (2006a). Dictionnaire Marba. Yagoua: CCMVL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A. (2006b). Dictionnaire Masa-français: Dialectes gumay et ɦaara (Tchad). Napoli: Edizioni Plus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis, A. (2019). Storia e identità linguistica. In Tessiture dell’identità. Lingua, cultura e territorio dei Gizey tra Camerun e Ciad (pp. 43–104). Liguori Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, R., & Wolff, E. H. (2019). Afroasiatic linguistic features and typologies. In E. H. Wolff (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of African linguistics (pp. 246–325). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (1986). Reduplicated nouns in Hausa. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 8, 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (1989). The historical change from suffixal to prefixal reduplication in Hausa pluractional verbs. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, 11, 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (1990). Nominal and verbal plurality in Chadic. Dordrecht: Foris publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2000). The Hausa language: An encyclopedic reference grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2009). Hausa and the Chadic languages. In B. Comrie (Ed.), The world’s major languages (2nd ed., pp. 618–634). London: Routledge. http://hdl.handle.net/2022/21482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. (2013). The Chadic language Family: Classification and name index. Mega-Chad research network / Réseau Méga-Tchad. http://lah.soas.ac.uk/projects/megachad/misc.html.

  • Novotna, J. (2000). Reduplication in Swahili. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere, 64, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgun, C. O. (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology with special attention to optimality theory [PhD dissertation]. University of California.

  • Orgun, C. O., & Inkelas, S. (2002). Reconsidering bracket erasure. In G. Booij & J. Van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001 (pp. 115–146). Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3726-5_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, D. (1979). Russian morphology and lexical theory. http://157.138.8.12/jspui/bitstream/11707/69/1/Posetsky.pdf.

  • Roberts, J., & Soulokadi, A. C. (2019). On ideophones in Musey. In H. Tourneux & Y. Treis (Eds.), Topics in Chadic linguistics X – papers from the 9th biennial international colloquium on the Chadic languages, Villejuif, September 7–8, 2017 (pp. 215–226). Rüdiger Köppe Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, R. G. (1998). A grammar of Miya. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuh, R. G. (2002). The locus of pluractional reduplication in West Chadic. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.488.2030&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Schuh, R. G. (2008). Agentive nouns and derived verbs in Hausa. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f432/f6c46292a89fd895e8e2dfe260b35d90edf3.pdf?_ga=2.206889363.1200358648.1600339877-1009201699.1600250840.

  • Schuh, R. G. (2017). A Chadic Cornucopia. P. Newman (Ed.). Oakland: Department of Linguistics. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5zx6z32d.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, A. (n.d.). A dictionary of Musey. https://silo.tips/download/a-dictionary-of-musey.

  • Steriade, D. (1988). Reduplication and syllable transfer in Sanskrit and elsewhere. Phonology, 5, 73–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional morphology: A theory of paradigm structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourneux, H. (1978). Le mulwi ou vulum de Mogroum (Tchad): Phonologie-éléments de grammaire. Paris: SELAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourneux, H. (1986). La langue Mbara. In Les Mbara et leur langue (Tchad) (pp. 119–249). Paris: SELAF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viljoen, M. H. (2013). A grammatical description of the Buwal language. Victoria: La Trobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, V. (2000). Le lexique Zimé-français (vun heɗe). http://zime.free.fr/lexique.htm.

  • Yu, A. C. L. (2005). Toward a typology of compensatory reduplication. In J. D. Alderete, A. Kochetov, & C. Han (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 397–405).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very grateful to Mikhail Kissine and Philippe De Brabanter for numerous corrections, discussions, and suggestions. I am also very grateful to Yvonne Treis, Abbie Hantgan, Tatiana Nikitina, Izabela Jordanoska, Rogier te Paske, Ekaterina Aplonova, Silué Songfolo Lacina, Bethany Lycan, Olga Kuznetsova, two anonymous reviewers and Morphology’s editor for helpful suggestions. I am deeply indebted to Antonino Melis for always sharing his Gizey data with me. This work also benefited from numerous exchanges with members of the Labex EFL during my research visit at the LLACAN (Sept. 27 – Dec. 20, 2020).

Funding

My research is funded by the Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB) under the MINI ARC framework.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillaume Guitang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guitang, G. Frozen reduplication in Gizey: insights into analogical reduplication, phonological and morphological doubling in Masa. Morphology 32, 121–151 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-021-09389-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-021-09389-3

Keywords

Navigation