Skip to main content
Log in

Spacing behaviour and habitat use of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) at low density in the Italian Alps

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in northern latitudes have shown that, in the breeding season, the majority of cocks pair monogamously and defend small territories, whilst in most populations, a small proportion of cocks are polygynous or remain unmated. Little is known, however, on spacing behaviour and habitat use of alpine rock ptarmigan populations occurring at low densities at the southern edge of the species’ range. From 1995 to 1997, we trapped, radio-tracked and observed birds in the Central Italian Alps (elevation 2,000–3,000 m) in order to investigate spacing behaviour and habitat use in alpine landscapes where habitats offering rich food and cover are patchy. Both sexes were selective in their habitat use, and cocks did not establish territories on bare ground, artificial or nutrient rich grasslands or bogs. In the breeding season, cocks had larger home ranges than hens (cocks 99 ± 57 ha, hens 50 ± 25 ha) that overlapped with the ranges of neighbouring cocks and hens. Cocks were monogamous and defended relatively large territories (core areas of home ranges: cocks 37 ± 26 ha, hens 24 ± 12 ha), which corresponded with low spring densities (0.47–2.29 cocks km−2 and 0.35–1.60 pairs km−2). Territory size of individual cocks was negatively correlated with the amount of high quality habitat in the core-area. Our results suggest increased home ranges and large breeding territories in low density alpine rock ptarmigan populations, compared to populations occurring at higher densities in the central and northern alps, and on subarctic and arctic grounds at northern latitudes, confirming the predictions of models on food-based territoriality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bart J, Earnst SL (1999) Relative importance of male and territory quality in pairing success of male rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:355–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossert A (1980) Winterökologie des Alpenschneehuhns (Lagopus mutus Montin) im Aletschgebiet, Schweizer Alpen. Orn Beob 77:121–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert A (1995) Bestandsentwicklung und Habitatnutzung des Alpenschneehuhns Lagopus mutus im Aletschgebiet (Schweizer Alpen). Orn Beob 92:307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossert A, Marti C, Niedermauser F (1983) Zur Bestandsentwicklung des Alpenschneehuhns (Lagopus mutus Montin) im Aletschgebiet (Zentralalpen) von 1973–1983. Bull Murithienne 100:39–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudarel P (1988) Recherches sur l’habitat et le comportement spatial du lagopède alpin dans Pyrénées occidentales françaises. Gibier Faune Sauvage 5:227–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Caizergues A, Bernard-Laurent A, Brenot J-F, Ellison L, Rasplus JY (2003) Population genetic structure of rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus in Northern and Western Europe. Mol Ecol 12:2267–2274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter FL, MacMillen RE (1976) Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a Hawaiian honeycreeper. Science 194:639–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1993) CORINE land cover-technical guide. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Brussels

  • Cotter RC (1999) The reproductive biology of Rock Ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in the central Canadian Arctic. Arctic 52:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Franceschi P (1992) Pernice bianca. In: Brichetti P, De Franceschi P, Baccetti N (eds) Fauna d’Italia, vol. XXIX: Aves I: 708–721. Calderini, Bologna

  • De Franceschi P, Bottazzo M (1991) Caratteristiche vegetazionali di alcuni biotopi di riproduzione di Pernice bianca nel Tarvisiano ed in Carnia. In: Spagnesi M, Toso S (eds) Atti II Conv. Naz. Biol. Selvaggina 19:165–180. INBS, Bologna

  • Desmet JF (1988) Densité de peuplement en période de reproduction du lagopède alpin (Lagopus mutus helveticus, Thieneman 1829) en haute Vallée du Giffre (Haute-Savoie). Gibier Faune Sauvage 5:447–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasel M, Zbinden N (1983) Kausalanalyse zum Verlauf der südlichen Arealgrenze des Alpenschneehuhns Lagopus mutus im Tessin. Orn Beob 80:231–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon SJ, Dobush G (1997) Pairing status of male willow ptarmigan: is polygyny costly to males? Anim Behav 53:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman RW, Braun CE (1975) Migration of a wintering population of white-tailed ptarmigan in Colorado. J Wildl Manage 39:485–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holder K, Montgomerie R, Friesen VL (1999) A test of the glacial refugium hypothesis using patterns of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence variation in rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus). Evolution 53:1936–1950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holder K, Montgomerie R, Friesen VL (2000) Glacial vicariance and historical biogeography of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in the Bering region. Mol Ecol 9:1265–1278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huber B, Ingold P (1991) Bestand und Verteilung der Territorien des Alpenschneehuhns Lagopus mutus am Augstmatthorn BE. Orn Beob 88:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes L (2000). Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol 15:56–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection. Oecologia 14:413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE, Hodder KH (1996). Ranges V. An analysis system for biological location data. Institute for Terrestrial Ecology, Wareham, Dorset

  • Körner C (1999) Alpine plant life: functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kumstátová T, Brinke T, S, Fuchs R, Petrusek A (2004) Habitat preferences of tree pipit (Anthus trivialis) and meadow pipit (A. pratensis) at sympatric and allopatric localities. J Ornithol 145:334–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly B, McDonald l, Thomas d (1993) Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marti C, Bossert A (1985) Beobachtungen zur Sommeraktivität und Brutbiologie des Alpenschneehuhns Lagopus mutus im Aletschgebiet (Wallis). Orn Beob 82:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin K, Stacey PB, Braun CE (1997) Demographic rescue and maintenance of population stability in grouse—beyond metapopulations. Wildl Biol 3:295–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin K, Stacey PB, Braun CE (2000) Recruitment, dispersal, and demographic rescue in spatially-structured White-tailed Ptarmigan populations. Condor 102:503–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen OK, Pétursson G (1995) Population fluctuations of gyrfalcon and Rock Ptarmigan: analysis of export figures from Iceland. Wildl Biol 1:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novoa C, Gonzalez G (1988) Comparaison des biotopes sélectionnés par le lagopède alpin (Lagopus mutus) et la perdrix grise des Pyrénées (Perdix perdix hispaniensis) sur le Massif du Carlit (Pyrénées-Orientales). Gibier Faune Sauvage 5:187–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherini GC, Tosi G, Wauters LA (2003) Social behaviour, reproductive biology and breeding success of alpine rock ptarmigan Lagopus mutus helveticus in northern Italy. Ardea 91:11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman DE, Powell RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77:2075–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen JB, Unander S (1985) Breeding biology of the Svalbard Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus mutus hyperboreus. Ornis Scan 16:191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch I (2000) Grouse Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan 2000–04 (Compiler). IUCN, Gland and Cambridge, and the World. Pheasant Association, Reading

  • Unander S, Steen JB (1985) Behaviour and social structure in Svalbard Rock Ptarmigan Lagopus mutus hyperboreus. Ornis Scan 16:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (2000) Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. Springer series in statistics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson A (1965). A population study of ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) in Scotland. J Anim Ecol 34:135–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Garrot RA (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking rata. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Worton BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70:164–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Stefano Piccinini, the game wardens and hunters from the Bormio Hunting District for their help with the fieldwork. Constructive comments by Adam Watson greatly helped to improve the manuscript. The work was funded by the Servizio Faunistico of the Regione Lombardia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc A. Wauters.

Additional information

Communicated by F. Bairlein

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Favaron, M., Scherini, G.C., Preatoni, D. et al. Spacing behaviour and habitat use of rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus) at low density in the Italian Alps. J Ornithol 147, 618–628 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0087-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-006-0087-z

Keywords

Navigation